 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

© Nature
Publishing
Group
2006 |
|
 |
The hydrogen 21-cm line
September 1st marks the fiftieth anniversary of Ewen and Purcell's report in
Nature of the discovery of the hydrogen 21-cm line. In fact,
they had seen the signal months before, but waited for corroboration
by Dutch and Australian astronomers before publishing: Muller
and Oort's paper* in the pages following Ewen and Purcell's
report includes the text of a cable sent by Pawsey from Australia.
Oort had already realized the significance of the discovery
that detection of this spectral line, produced by transitions
between hyperfine levels of the ground-state hydrogen atom,
would permit measurements of velocities by the Doppler effect.
The 21-cm line put radioastronomy on the map, and brought
about a revolution in the study of galactic structure.
Nature 168, 356-358 (1951)
| click here
for a PDF version (110 K)|
*Muller, C. A. & Oort, J. H. Nature 168, 357358 (1951).
| click here for PDF version (217 K)|
|
Observation of a Line in the Galactic Radio Spectrum
Radiation from Galactic Hydrogen at 1,420 Mc./sec.
The ground-state of the hydrogen atom is a hyperfine doublet the splitting of which, determined by the method of atomic beams, is 1,420.405 Mc./sec.1. Transitions occur between the upper (F = 1) and lower (F = 0) components by magnetic dipole radiation or absorption. The possibility of detecting this transition in the spectrum of galactic radiation, first suggested by H. C. van de Hulst2, has remained one of the challenging problems of radio-astronomy. In interstellar regions not too near hot stars, hydrogen atoms are relatively abundant, there being, according to the usual estimate, about one atom per cm.3. Most of these atoms should be in the ground-state. The detectability of the hyperfine transition hinges on the question whether the temperature which characterizes the distribution of population over the hyperfine doubletwhich for want of a better name we shall call the hydrogen 'spin temperature'is lower than, equal to, or greater than the temperature which characterizes the background radiation field in this part of the galactic radio spectrum. If the spin temperature is lower than the temperature of the radiation field, the hyperfine line ought to appear in absorption; if it is higher, one would expect a 'bright' line; while if the temperatures are the same no line could be detected. The total intensity within the line, per unit band-width, should depend only on the difference between these temperatures, providing the source is thick enough to be opaque.
We can now report success in observing this line. A micro-wave radiometer, built especially for the purpose, consists mainly of a double superheterodyne receiver with pass band of 17 kc., the band being shifted back and forth through 75 kc. thirty times per second. The conventional phase-sensitive detector and narrow (0.016 c./s.) filter then enable the radiometer to record the apparent radio temperature difference between two spectral bands 75 kc. apart. These bands are slowly swept in frequency through the region of interest. The overall noise figure of the receiver, measured by the glow-discharge method3, is 11 db., and the mean output fluctuation at the recorder corresponds to a temperature change of 3.5°. The antenna is a pyramidal horn of about 12° half-power beam-width. It is rigidly mounted at declination 5°; scanning is effected by the earth's rotation.
The line was first detected on March 25, 1951. It appeared in emission with a width of about 80 kc., and was most intense in the direction 18 hr. right ascension. Many subsequent observations have established the following facts. At declination 5° the line is detectable, by our equipment, over a period of about six hours, during which the apparent temperature at the centre of the line rises to a maximum of 25° above background and then subsides into the background. The source appears to be an extended one approximately centred about the galactic plane. The frequency of the centre of the line, which was measured with an accuracy of ±5 kc., was displaced some 150 kc. above the laboratory value, and this shift varied during an observing period. Both the shift and its variation are reasonably well accounted for by the earth's orbital motion and the motion of the solar system toward Hercules. The period of reception shifts two hours per month, in solar time, as it ought to.
Some conclusions can already be drawn from these results. Extrapolation of radio temperature data for somewhat lower frequencies4 suggests that the background radiation temperature near the 21-cm. line is not more than 10° K. Then the hydrogen spin temperature is not more than 35° K., if the source is 'thick'. But we can calculate the opacity of the source on the assumption of a spin temperature of 35° K. and 1 atom/cm.3, using only the observed line-width and the matrix element of the transition in question, and we obtained 900 light-years for the absorption-length. As this is much smaller than galactic dimensions, we conclude that the temperature observed corresponds indeed to the spin temperature at the source. To the extent that 'self-absorption' contributes to the observed line-width, the true absorption length at the frequency of the centre may be less than that computed. Further evidence for relatively high opacity is the absence of large frequency-shifts, which would be expected to arise from galactic rotation were the opacity-thickness comparable to the size of the galaxy. This conclusion is contrary to the prediction of Shklovsky5, who has recently discussed the possibility of detecting galactic line radiation.
We have made rough theoretical estimates of the efficacy of various processes through which energy is exchanged between the hydrogen hyperfine levels and the other thermal reservoirs in the interstellar matter plus radiation complex. Of these we find exchange with the radiation field (involving spontaneous emission) and exchange with gas-kinetic energy of the hydrogen atoms (via HH collisions) much the most important, with the latter process probably dominant. This is consistent with the observation, and if correct implies that the gas-kinetic temperature of the hydrogen exceeds, but not greatly, the spin temperature. The estimated spin relaxation time for these processes is of the order of 105 years.
This work was assisted by a grant from the Rumford Fund of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
H. I. EWEN
E. M. PURCELL
Lyman Laboratory,
Harvard University,
Cambridge,
Mass.
June 14.
- Kusch, P., and Prodell, A. G., Phys. Rev., 79, 1009 (1950).
- van de Hulst, H. C., Nederl. Tij. Natuurkunde, 's-Gravenhage-Martinus Nyhoff, 11, 201 (1945)
- Mumford, W. W., Bell Syst. Tech. J., 28, 608 (1949).
- Herbstreit, J. W., and Johler, J. R., Nature, 161, 515 (1948).
- Shklovsky, I. S., Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, 26, 10 (1949) (in Russian).
| return to looking back index page |
|