Abstract
The oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), which has a high morbidity rate, affects patients worldwide. Changes in SPINK7 in precancerous lesions could promote oncogenesis. Our aim was to evaluate SPINK7 as a potential molecular biomarker which predicts OSCC stages, compared to: HER2, TP53, RB1, NFKB and CYP4B1. This study used oral biopsies from three patient groups: dysplasia (n = 33), less invasive (n = 28) and highly invasive OSCC (n = 18). The control group consisted of clinically suspicious cases later to be confirmed as normal mucosa (n = 20). Gene levels of SPINK7, P53, RB, NFKB and CYP4B1 were quantified by qPCR. SPINK7 levels were correlated with a cohort of 330 patients from the TCGA. Also, SPINK7, HER2, TP53, and RB1, were evaluated by immunohistofluorescence. One-way Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's post-hoc with a p < 0.05 significance was used to analyze data. In OSCC, the SPINK7 expression had down regulated while P53, RB, NFKB and CYP4B1 had up regulated (p < 0.001). SPINK7 had also diminished in TCGA patients (p = 2.10e-6). In less invasive OSCC, SPINK7 and HER2 proteins had decreased while TP53 and RB1 had increased with respect to the other groups (p < 0.05). The changes of SPINK7 accompanied by HER2, P53 and RB1 can be used to classify the molecular stage of OSCC lesions allowing a diagnosis at molecular and histopathological levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignancy of the head and neck. The morbidity rate of OSCC remains high even after five years of been diagnosed (37.8%)1. Despite great improvement in treatment and therapy, the prognosis remains poor2. Furthermore, OSCC often causes dysfunctions and aesthetic disorders. It also has a high incidence in cervical lymph node metastasis thus worsening patients’ quality of life3. Several tumor biomarkers have been suggested as predictive for OSCC prognosis with poor outcome4, however, specific molecular prognostic factors have only been partially identified5. The pattern of invasion (POI) presented by Brandwein-Gensler et al., classifies the POI in five types6, and has been validated as an independent prognostic factor in oral cancer7. However, it is necessary to identify changes in proteins and genes, to improve diagnostic strategies in precancerous, invasive and metastatic stages8.
One of the cancer hallmarks is the alteration of molecules related to cell adhesion and migration9. Adhesion molecules play a central role in pathogenesis and progression of malignant tumors10. Serine Peptidase Inhibitor, Kazal Type 7 (SPINK7, ECRG2) belongs to a family of 13 members (1–13) of proteins with inhibitory Serine Peptidase activity identified in 1998 in esophageal tissue11. This novel tumor suppressor gene was identified as such by comparing normal esophageal epithelia and primary squamous cell carcinoma tissues12,13. It has been reported that SPINK7 inhibits tumor cell growth, promotes cell apoptosis, and inhibits cancer cell migration, invasion and metastasis in vitro14,15.
The HER2, P53, RB1, NFKB and CYP4B1 genes and their proteins were found to be altered in OSCC carcinogenesis16. The human epidermal growth factor receptors (HER/EGFR) are a family of trans membrane tyrosine kinase receptors comprising 1 to 4 (HER1-4)17. The overexpression of HER is involved in the development of oncogenesis, including OSCC, as it regulates different cellular pathways. HER2 (also known as C-erbB-2/ERBB2/ErbB2) plays a critical role in cell proliferation, survival, migration, angiogenesis, and metastasis through a variety of intracellular signaling cascades such as MAPK/ERK1/2 and Pi3K/Akt18,19. An imbalance in these pathways can lead to permanent activation20,21. Studies have established a marked correlation between HER2 expression and the poor survival of OSCC patients22. It has been reported that the SPINK proteins family share 50% of homology to the EGF protein and can interact by binding with the EGFR receptor thus activating EGFR downstream AKT signaling pathway, inducing epithelial mesenchymal transition23. The SPINK6 protein is secreted and acts as a functional regulator of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell metastasis through the binding to the EGFR extracellular domain23.
In cancer cells, tumor-suppressor genes like Protein 53 (TP53) and Retinoblastoma (RB1) are inactivated by mutation, deletion and methylation24. It is well established that TP53 is a genome guardian and plays a pivotal role in regulating the cell cycle, cellular differentiation, DNA repair, and apoptosis25,26. Somatic mutations in TP53 are detected in > 60% of OSCC and in 10% of oral dysplasia27. Recently, Genome Wide Association Study data has shown that TP53 is usually mutated in papillomavirus-negative OSCC patients28. The TP53 mutations in OSCC (classified in low- and high-risk missense mutations) are associated with resistance to Cisplatin, distant metastasis and poor prognosis29,30,31. The overall survival of TP53-mutant OSCC patients is also markedly worse than patients with TP53 wild-type32. Previous studies reported that SPINK7 also participates in centrosome amplification in a TP53-dependent manner and has a role in maintaining chromosome stability33. RB1, another gene that plays a key role in the regulation of cell cycle and differentiation was found to be altered in OSCC. The active form of RB1 (phosphorylated pRB1), acts a regulator at the G1-S restriction point as it arrests the cell cycle34. Mutations lead to functional pRB1 inactivation, failure of growth and tumor suppression control35.
Another molecule altered in carcinogenesis is the Nuclear factor-κB (NFKB). This is a proinflammatory transcription factor that plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of the cancer36. NFKB is constitutively activated in OSCCs and is involved in promoting the invasive characteristics37. The cytochrome P450 enzyme family (CYP450) is one of the most important with respect to the cell detoxification machinery38,39. Their activity consists in catalyzing reactions that participate in both biosynthesis and degradation of drug metabolism and xenobiotic biotransformation pathways40. These enzymes can participate indirectly in the OSCC carcinogenesis through activation and detoxification of these compounds38,40.
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is an important tool to provide expression profiles from cancer patient samples and the associated clinical-pathological data for > 30 human cancer types41. However, there are few studies on genome-wide profiling of OSCC tumors.
The aim of this work was to evaluate SPINK7 as a potential molecular biomarker which predicts OSCC stages, compared to: HER2, TP53, RB1, NFKB and CYP4B1, as well to explore their potential therapeutic applications (early detection and targeted therapies).
Results
Study population data
Of a total of 71 Caucasian patients with oral dysplasia or OSCC consented and were enrolled in the present study. The average age was 52 years. The predominant gender was male. Of the total of patients, 30% had no smoking habits, 20% were light smokers (less than 10 cigarettes per day), 40% heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day) and a 10% did not specify if they had smoking habits; the tongue ride being the most frequent tumor location (80%) (Table 1). The supplementary Table 2 shows the TNM, POI and deep invasion of the epithelium score respect to the histopathological diagnosis.
The oral epithelium changes among OSCC stages
To analyze epithelial changes in OSCC progression, the oral biopsies were evaluated by H&E and classified in dysplasia, less invasive and highly invasive OSCC. We found 33 cases of dysplasia, 28 cases of less invasive OSCC and 18 cases of highly invasive OSCC. In all dysplasia cases, the tissue did not show loss of basement membrane continuity or presence of epithelial cells invading the stroma, although an increase in epithelial cell layers and presence of mild leukocyte infiltrate was observed (Fig. 1A–D). In the OSCC groups both (less invasive and highly invasive), showed more than 5 layers of epithelial cells, hyperchromatism, cellular atypia and presence of keratin pearls, loss of continuity of the basement membrane and a severe leukocyte infiltrate was observed (Fig. 1B, C, E, F). In the highly invasive OSCC group, epithelial cell nests were observed in the stroma, total epithelial disorganization, keratin pearls and the leucocyte infiltration was severe. These results were correlated with poor prognosis. The inserts (black square) at high magnification show the oral epithelium changes among the OSCC stages (Fig. 1D–F). The oral epithelial cells alterations among less and highly invasive OSCC was showed in the supplementary Fig. 1.
SPINK7 generates a distinctive molecular signature among the OSCC stages
To evaluate the molecular status of the biopsies among the OSCC stages, we assessed the gene expression of SPINK7 with reported altered genes in carcinogenesis: TP53, RB1, NFKB and CYP4B1 in the groups. We found that SPINK7 progressively down regulated in oral dysplasia and OSCC groups with respect to the control group (p < 0.001). Regarding TP53, RB1, NFKB and CYP4B1 all were found to be up regulated in OSCC groups with respect to dysplasia and control groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, with the exception of SPINK7, we observed differential expression levels of the rest of the genes between less invasive OSCC and highly invasive OSCC groups (TP53, RB1 and NFKB (p < 0.05); CYP4B1 p < 0.001)) (Fig. 2). The differences observed regarding the gene expression among the groups were correlated with the prognosis (less versus highly invasive OSCC).
SPINK7 was found to be down regulated in patients from TCGA
To evaluate if the SPINK7 gene expression profile observed in our study population was reproducible with other cohorts of OSCC patients, we analyzed the gene expression levels in 581 patients with OSCC from the TCGA (primary tissue) and the results were compared with normal subjects data (normal tissue) through in silico analysis42. The results were graphed as a box plot comparing the gene expression of the normal group (blue box plot) versus the primary tumors group (yellow box plot) showing significant down regulation of SPINK7 p = 2.10e-06 and this result was correlated with our results respect to SPINK7 gene expression (Fig. 3A).
SPINK7 does not show mutations according to the TCGA mutation gene profile
To understand if the differential expression of SPINK7 among the OSCC stages is related to a mutational profile, we analyzed in silico mutations described to date of a cohort of 329 patients from the TCGA database. We identified 15 genes with a differential rate of mutations associated to OSCC, SPINK7 being the gene of interest included in the analysis. We found that TP53 was the gene with the highest number of mutations in the OSCC cohort, being mutated in 69% of patients (Fig. 3B). The most frequent type of variant was missense mutations followed by nonsense mutations, frameshift deletions, and multi hits mutations. TTN gene showed a mutation rate of 34%, FAT1 (26%), CDKN2A (22%), NOTCH1 (18%), PIK3CA and MUC16 (16%), CASP8 (15%), SYNE1 (14%), CSMD3 and PCL2 (13%) and finally, KMT2D, LRP1B, DNAH5 and FLG genes were mutated in 12% of the patients. On the other hand, and with a more stable mutational profile, we found that RB1 was mutated in 2% of the samples, HER2, NFKB1 and CYP4B1 (1%) of the cohort. Finally, we found that SPINK7 is a genomic stable gene, which showed no mutations in any of the cases analyzed (Fig. 3B).
SPINK7 and HER2 changed differentially among the OSCC stages
It has been reported previously that SPINK proteins can interact with a HER2 receptor43. We evaluated the presence and abundance of SPINK7 among the different groups and its correlation with HER2 protein by confocal microscopy. We found that SPINK7(green signal) and HER2 (red signal) had significantly decreased in the less invasive OSCC group compared with dysplasia and highly invasive OSCC groups (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the highly invasive OSCC group showed SPINK7 protein levels similar to dysplasia and no significant differences were found. Regarding HER2, it was found to be significantly reduced in the less invasive OSCC compared to the other groups. Meanwhile, the highly invasive OSCC group showed a significant increase of HER2 compared to less invasive OSCC (p < 0.001), being similar to the dysplasia group (Fig. 4A, B).
SPINK7 and HER2 were colocalized
Due to the overlapping of signals (yellow signal) between SPINK7 (green signal) and HER2 (red signal) in confocal microscopy, we evaluated at high magnification images (120X digital zoom) through colocalization analysis. The intensity variability of both channels was statistically evaluated using Pearson's coefficient of 1 as positive result (r = 0,99). Yellow versus red and green pixels were quantified yielding a co-occurrence value of 56.58% (Fig. 4C).
TP53 and pRB1 changed differentially among the OSCC stages
To evaluate cell cycle regulators in the OSCC, we analyzed TP53 and pRB1 protein levels among the groups by confocal microscopy. The less invasive OSCC group showed a significant increase of TP53 and pRB1 compared to dysplasia and highly invasive OSCC groups (p < 0.05). Regarding the highly invasive OSCC group, both proteins (TP53 and pRB1) significantly decreased with respect to the other groups (p < 0.001) (Fig. 5A, B).
Discussion
The oral squamous cell carcinoma has a high morbidity rate in the world1. Despite the progress in research and therapy, survival has not improved significantly in the last decades44. The biomarkers study aims to understand the role of genetic and lifestyle factors of the tumor biology including OSCC45. We studied changes in proteins related with some of the cancer hallmarks (cell survival, cell cycle, inflammation, metastasis and metabolism) to stratify molecularly oral precancerous and cancerous lesions46. Currently, the gold standard of OSCC diagnosis is the biopsy, however, the results are observer-dependent and subjective44,47.
The current study is reporting the SPINK7 expression changes among the OSCC stages and we propose this protein as a "new biomarker” associated with the natural progression of the OSCC. We found differences among the oral epithelial organization in dysplasia and less or highly invasive OSCC groups, and these results were correlated with the literature48,49, showing a differential gene expression profile by qPCR analysis with a distinctive "molecular signature” in each stage. We found SPINK7 to be significantly down regulated at dysplasia and OSCC compared with the control group. Meanwhile TP53, RB1, NFKB and CYP4B1 were found to be significantly up regulated at OSCC stages compared with dysplasia and the control groups. The results obtained by SPINK7 in our study population were compared to a cohort of 541 patients from the TGCA database50. The comparative analysis showed that SPINK7 was found to be significantly down regulated in patients with OSCC compared to normal tissue and this could be related with the advanced stage of the malignant lesion51. Additionally, we analyzed the mutation profile of genes described in TCGA altered in OSCC including SPINK7, TP53, RB1, NFKB and CYP4B1. We found that TP53 showed a high mutation rate in OSCC meanwhile SPINK7 was the most stable without any mutation described. These results suggest that the down regulation of the gene would be related to other mechanisms not associated to TP53 gene and needs to be explored in the future.
Due to the fact that the SPINK proteins family is related with extracellular matrix remodeling and cell migration regulation43, we evaluated the abundance of SPINK7 and HER2 and if there is correlation between them. It has been reported that SPINK7 shares 50% of homology with EGF43. We found SPINK7 increased in the highly invasive OSCC group. These results were similar to previous studies describing that SPINK6 was increased in highly metastatic tumors43. SPINK6 regulates the metastasis via EGFR signaling and their expression levels change during the carcinogenesis52. Interestingly, SPINK7 and HER2 were overexpressed in the highly invasive OSCC compared to the less invasive OSCC group. Additionally, the SPINK7 and HER2 colocalization analysis showed that both proteins are close (suggesting interaction), however subsequent tests with a larger sample size are necessary to evaluate and understand its interaction or co-compartmentalization51. The differential expression of the studied proteins among the OSCC stages could be related with disorganization of the oral epithelium and to a non-functional protein or absence of their ligands, but it needs to be explored in more detail in the future53. The differential proteins expression among the stages allowed stratifying the groups to molecular and histological levels correlated with prognosis. It has been reported in esophageal cancer that cells treated with a siRNA for SPINK1 were resistant to the antitumoral drug Cisplatin54. This could be interesting in order to stratify the patients who respond, or not, to the standard chemotherapy.
Regarding the studied cell cycle factors, TP53 and pRB1, the confocal microscopy analysis showed that both proteins up regulated in the less invasive OSCC respect to dysplasia; meanwhile in the highly invasive OSCC both down regulated, which is consistent with previous studies55. These could be explained through the high rate of mutation profile of both genes showed in OSCC in the TCGA in silico analysis. These results suggest that in OSCC, TP53 and pRB1 are present but non-functional and this could be related with a more aggressive tumor55. We found that SPINK7 had significantly downregulated in the less invasive OSCC group, while TP53 levels remained higher. This could be explained in part by the results recently published by Patel, H. et al., which showed that SPINK7 is a novel transcriptional target of p53 and can modulate cancer cell sensitivity to DNA damage in cell death and disease. Interestingly, while wild-type p53 increase SPINK7 protein levels, tumor-derived mutant p53 (R273H) does not change or decrease SPINK7 protein levels.56.
Our results suggest that the changes in the expression of SPINK7 can be used to predict the molecular stage of the OSCC lesions. This molecule could be a new “potential” biomarker. Future studies are needed to validate this novel tumor suppressor gene that could be applied as a possible early diagnostic method to precancerous oral lesions and OSCC.
Methods
Study population
Patients with suspected oral lesions of OSCC were enrolled. After signing the informed consent, the subjects were interviewed using a standard questionnaire that requested information about socio-demographic, medical, and lifestyle factors. The patients from Department of Head and Neck surgery of The National Cancer Institute, Dental school of Universidad de Valparaíso, Dental school of Universidad del Desarrollo (Chile), The Hospital Lencinas and the Servicio de Estomatología y Medicina Bucal Dental school, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina); received a routine intraoral examination and oral mucosal biopsies were taken and classified according to the diagnosis and POI in three groups: oral epithelial dysplasia, less invasive OSCC (POI type 1 and 2) and invasive OSCC (POI type 3, 4 and 5) group. Eighty-one cases of primary OSCC diagnosed over a period of 2 years (2017–2019) were included in the study. None of the patients had received any tumor specific therapy (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) before the resection. Twenty cases diagnosed as inflammatory lesions and histologically confirmed with normal mucosal margins from the resection specimens were included as control group in the qPCR analysis. The Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Universidad del Desarrollo (FM-UDD CAS), National Cancer Institute of Chile and Medicine School of Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (FCM-UNCuyo) approved this study according to Declaration of Helsinki to experimentation with human subjects.
Histopathological analysis
The Oral biopsies were fixed in 10% buffered formalin (Merck, USA), embedded in paraffin (Merck), and sectioned. Tissue sections of 4 μm were deparaffinized with Neoclear (Merck), rehydrated with graded alcohols, stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E, Merck), and visualized with a light microscope (DM2000; Leica, Germany). Images were captured with a digital camera (DFC295; Leica). Samples were classified according to the revised criteria given by the World Health Organization (2005). Three independent observers performed histological analyses blind; one of them is a pathologist expert in oral diseases57,58.
Immunohistofluorescence analysis
Tissue sections of 4 μm were deparaffinized, rehydrated, blocked with 5% FBS (Gibco, USA) dissolved in PBS 1X (Gibco, USA) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with a dilution 1:50 of antibodies for anti-SPINK7 (Abcam, ab122326, USA), anti-HER2 (BD Pharmigen™, #554,299, USA), anti-p53 (Abcam, (PAb 1801 ab28, USA) and anti-pRB (8516S, Cell signaling, USA). Then, samples were washed with PBS 1X and incubated two hours at room temperature with a dilution 1:400 of Alexa488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or Alexa 555-conjugated rabitt anti-mouse IgG (Cell Signaling, USA). Cross-reactivity of the secondary antibody was tested incubating samples without the primary antibody. Nuclei were counterstained with a dilution 1:1500 of DAPI (Sigma, Aldrich) in PBS 1X. Samples were embedded in fluorescence mounting medium S3023 (Dako cytomation, USA) and scanned in a confocal microscope (Olympus). Five representative optical sections by sample (n = 6/group) were photographed using 60X magnification. The images obtained per field of each sample, were processed with the same conditions and the positive protein signal (pixels intensity) was analyzed and quantified using Fiji Image J software (NIH, USA)57,58.
Confocal microscopy analysis
A Gaussian filter of 1 was applied and a constant background value of 150 was subtracted for each image. The same threshold value was set for each channel including the structures of interest and the corresponding masks were obtained. The yellow pixels (red and green pixels overlap) versus the total pixels were quantified and the colocalization was measured with Coloc2 plugin (Fiji ImageJ)51.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was isolated from the oral biopsies. The mRNA was purified using RNEasy PlusMini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Contaminating genomic DNA was degraded with 1 U of DNAse RQ1 (Promega). One μg of RNA was reverse transcribed for 60 min at 42 °C using 200 U M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and 0.5 μM oligo-dT primers (Invitrogen). Real time PCR was performed in a final volume of 10 μL containing 50 ng of cDNA, Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and 0.5 μM of each specific primer, using the Step One Plus PCR system (Life Technologies). Controls without reverse transcriptase were included. Amplicons were analyzed according to their size and melting temperature (Supplementary Table 1). To normalize data, 18S RNA and β-actin were used as reference genes. The RNA level of a target gene was calculated using the 2ΔCt method and graphed as fold change59.
Gene expressions TCGA profile
The data studied was programmatically extracted from the publicly available data set of OSCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project (TCGA) on May, 2019 using the recount2 platform (https://jhubiostatistics.shinyapps.io/recount/). Non-standardized RNASeq gene expression levels from 548 samples were downloaded. Samples from oral cavity were selected obtaining a final subset of 332 tumor samples and 32 non-tumoral tissue samples. RNA expression levels were evaluated for 6 genes (NFKB1, RB1, TP53, ERBB2, CYP4B1, SPINK7). Crude counts were scaled by the total coverage of the sample (area under the curve, ‘AUC’) and differential gene expression analysis (DGE) was performed using the generalized linear model method of the EdgeR R package comparing non-tumor versus tumor samples60. Log2 Fold change values were obtained associated with exact p-values and False Discovery Rate values (FDR). To evaluate gene expression correlation, data was transformed using Voom conversion from the R limma package, allowing normal linear modeling of the RNA counts. Afterwards, pairwise Pearson’s product-moment correlation analysis was performed for the aforementioned genes and p-values were calculated50.
Gene mutations TCGA profile
The mutational analysis of OSCC, data was programmatically downloaded using the TCGA biolinks package of Bioconductor61. Mutation Annotation Format (MAF) files with aggregated mutation information generated from whole-exome sequencing were downloaded. From 546 samples of Head and Neck cancer, 329 samples of OSCC were obtained. The maftools Bioconductor package was used to analyze and visualize the MAF files62. An Oncoplot was drawn showing the variants (SNP) of the 15 most mutated genes in OSCC, followed by 5 genes of interest (RB1, ERBB2, NFKB1, CYP4B1 and SPINK7)50.
Statistical analysis
The population distribution of the samples from our patients was non-parametric. Comparisons of gene and protein expression among the groups were performed using One-way Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's test as post-test. Stat Graph Prism 6.0c software was used for statistical analysis. Data are presented as median ± SEM, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significative.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Universidad del Desarrollo (FM-UDD CAS), National Cancer Institute of Chile and Medicine School of Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (FCM-UNCuyo) approved this study according to Declaration of Helsinki to experimentation with human subjects.
References
Torre, L. A. et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 65, 87–108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262 (2015).
Grandi, C. et al. Prognostic significance of lymphatic spread in head and neck carcinomas: therapeutic implications. Head Neck. Surg. 8, 67–73 (1985).
Fillies, T. et al. Catenin expression in T1/2 carcinomas of the floor of the mouth. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 34, 907–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.03.010 (2005).
Rivera, C., Oliveira, A. K., Costa, R. A. P., De Rossi, T. & Paes Leme, A. F. Prognostic biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 72, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.003 (2017).
Ramaekers, F. C. et al. Coexpression of keratin- and vimentin-type intermediate filaments in human metastatic carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 2618–2622. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.9.2618 (1983).
Brandwein-Gensler, M. et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 29, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000149687.90710.21 (2005).
Almangush, A. et al. Depth of invasion, tumor budding, and worst pattern of invasion: prognostic indicators in early-stage oral tongue cancer. Head Neck 36, 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23380 (2014).
Sethi, S., Ali, S., Philip, P. A. & Sarkar, F. H. Clinical advances in molecular biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 14771–14784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140714771 (2013).
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).
Imai, K. et al. Immunolocalization of desmoglein and intermediate filaments in human oral squamous cell carcinomas. Head Neck 17, 204–212 (1995).
Cui, Y., Bi, M., Su, T., Liu, H. & Lu, S.-H. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel esophageal cancer related gene. Int. J. Oncol. 37, 1521–1528 (2010).
Su, T., Liu, H. & Lu, S. Cloning and identification of cDNA fragments related to human esophageal cancer. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chin. J. Oncol.] 20, 254–257 (1998).
Chui, X. et al. Immunohistochemical expression of the c-kit proto-oncogene product in human malignant and non-malignant breast tissues. Br. J. Cancer 73, 1233–1236. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.236 (1996).
Engels, K. et al. Dynamic intracellular survivin in oral squamous cell carcinoma: underlying molecular mechanism and potential as an early prognostic marker. J. Pathol. 211, 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2134 (2007).
Clevers, H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 127, 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.018 (2006).
Bernardes, V. F., Gleber-Netto, F. O., Sousa, S. F., Silva, T. A. & Aguiar, M. C. Clinical significance of EGFR, Her-2 and EGF in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a case control study. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. CR 29, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-40 (2010).
Press, M. F. & Lenz, H. J. EGFR, HER2 and VEGF pathways: validated targets for cancer treatment. Drugs 67, 2045–2075. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200767140-00006 (2007).
Burgess, A. W. et al. An open-and-shut case? Recent insights into the activation of EGF/ErbB receptors. Mol. Cell 12, 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00350-2 (2003).
Feng, Y. et al. Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis. Genes Dis. 5, 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.001 (2018).
Bernardes, V. F., Gleber-Netto, F. O., Sousa, S. F., Silva, T. A. & Aguiar, M. C. F. Clinical significance of EGFR, Her-2 and EGF in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a case control study. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-40 (2010).
Sasahira, T. & Kirita, T. Hallmarks of cancer-related newly prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082413 (2018).
Zheng, L.-S. et al. SPINK6 promotes metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma via binding and activation of epithelial growth factor receptor. Cancer Res. (2016).
Kim, M. S., Li, S. L., Bertolami, C. N., Cherrick, H. M. & Park, N. H. State of p53, Rb and DCC tumor suppressor genes in human oral cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res. 13, 1405–1413 (1993).
Choi, S. & Myers, J. Molecular pathogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: implications for therapy. J. Dent. Res. 87, 14–32 (2008).
Daniela Adorno-Farias, J. P. A., Montserrat Reyes, Ana Ortega, Blanca Urzúa, Lilian Jara, Alfredo Molina, José Jara, Jean Nunes dos Santos, Sandra Tarquínio, Ricardo Fernández-Ramires. Alteraciones genéticas de la mucosa oral hacia la transformación maligna. Acta Odontol. Venezolana 55 (2017).
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 (2011).
Network, C. G. A. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature 517, 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14129 (2015).
Neskey, D. M. et al. Evolutionary action score of TP53 identifies high-risk mutations associated with decreased survival and increased distant metastases in head and neck cancer. Can. Res. 75, 1527–1536. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2735 (2015).
Osman, A. A. et al. Evolutionary action score of TP53 coding variants is predictive of platinum response in head and neck cancer patients. Can. Res. 75, 1205–1215. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2729 (2015).
Sandulache, V. C. et al. High-risk TP53 mutations are associated with extranodal extension in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 1727–1733. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0721 (2018).
de Oliveira, L. R., Ribeiro-Silva, A. & Zucoloto, S. Prognostic impact of p53 and p63 immunoexpression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 36, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00517.x (2007).
Cheng, X., Shen, Z., Yang, J., Lu, S.-H. & Cui, Y. ECRG2 disruption leads to centrosome amplification and spindle checkpoint defects contributing chromosome instability. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5888–5898 (2008).
Thomas, S., Balan, A. & Balaram, P. The expression of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein in oral cancers and precancers: A clinicopathological study. Dent Res. J. (Isfahan) 12, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.161427 (2015).
Pande, P., Mathur, M., Shukla, N. K. & Ralhan, R. pRb and p16 protein alterations in human oral tumorigenesis. Oral Oncol. 34, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1368-8375(98)00024-4 (1998).
Postler, T. S. & Ghosh, S. Bridging the gap: a regulator of NF-κB linking inflammation and cancer. J. Oral Biosci. 57, 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.job.2015.05.001 (2015).
Jimi, E. et al. NF-κB acts as a multifunctional modulator in bone invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Sci. Int. 13, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1348-8643(15)00038-5 (2016).
Xu, X., Zhang, X. A. & Wang, D. W. The roles of CYP450 epoxygenases and metabolites, epoxyeicosatrienoic acids, in cardiovascular and malignant diseases. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63, 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.006 (2011).
Zelasko, S., Arnold, W. R. & Das, A. Endocannabinoid metabolism by cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 116–117, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2014.11.002 (2015).
Pikuleva, I. A. & Waterman, M. R. Cytochromes p450: roles in diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 17091–17098. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R112.431916 (2013).
Sundaram, K., Sambandam, Y., Tsuruga, E., Wagner, C. L. & Reddy, S. V. 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 modulates CYP2R1 gene expression in human oral squamous cell carcinoma tumor cells. Horm Cancer 5, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-014-0170-5 (2014).
Creighton, C. J. Making use of cancer genomic databases. Curr Protoc. Mol. Biol. 121, 191411–191413. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpmb.49 (2018).
Zheng, L.-S. et al. SPINK6 promotes metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma via binding and activation of epithelial growth factor receptor. Can. Res. 77, 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1281 (2017).
Woolgar, J. A. & Triantafyllou, A. Pitfalls and procedures in the histopathological diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and a review of the role of pathology in prognosis. Oral Oncol. 45, 361–385 (2009).
Cervino, G. et al. Molecular biomarkers related to oral carcinoma: clinical trial outcome evaluation in a literature review. Dis. Markers 2019, 8040361. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8040361 (2019).
Williams, H. K. Molecular pathogenesis of oral squamous carcinoma. Mol. Pathol. 53, 165–172 (2000).
Zini, A., Czerninski, R. & Sgan-Cohen, H. D. Oral cancer over four decades: epidemiology, trends, histology, and survival by anatomical sites. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 39, 299–305 (2010).
Napier, S. S. & Speight, P. M. Natural history of potentially malignant oral lesions and conditions: an overview of the literature. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 37, 1–10 (2008).
Speight, P. M. & Farthing, P. M. The pathology of oral cancer. Br. Dent. J. 225, 841–847. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.926 (2018).
Zoppino, F. C. M., Guerrero-Gimenez, M. E., Castro, G. N. & Ciocca, D. R. Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of heat shock proteins in the molecular subtypes of human breast cancer. BMC Cancer 18, 700–700. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4621-1 (2018).
Moser, B., Hochreiter, B., Herbst, R. & Schmid, J. A. Fluorescence colocalization microscopy analysis can be improved by combining object-recognition with pixel-intensity-correlation. Biotechnol. J. 12, 1600332. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600332 (2017).
Vats, S., Ganesh, M. & Agarwal, A. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 neu expression in head and neck squamous cell cancers and its clinicopathological correlation: Results from an Indian cancer center. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 61, 313–318. https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.236599 (2018).
Mazzoccoli, G. et al. A primary tumor gene expression signature identifies a crucial role played by tumor stroma myofibroblasts in lymph node involvement in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 8 (2017).
Goldstein, A. S., Zong, Y. & Witte, O. N. A two-step toward personalized therapies for prostate cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002169 (2011).
Lakshminarayana, S. et al. Molecular pathways of oral cancer that predict prognosis and survival: a systematic review. J. Carcinog. 17, 7–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcar.JCar_17_18 (2018).
Patel, H., Sheikh, M. S. & Huang, Y. ECRG2, a novel transcriptional target of p53, modulates cancer cell sensitivity to DNA damage. Cell Death Dis. 11, 543. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2728-1 (2020).
Bruna, F., Arango-Rodríguez, M., Plaza, A., Espinoza, I. & Conget, P. The administration of multipotent stromal cells at precancerous stage precludes tumor growth and epithelial dedifferentiation of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Stem Cell Res. 18, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2016.11.016 (2017).
Bruna, F., Plaza, A., Arango, M., Espinoza, I. & Conget, P. Systemically administered allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells do not aggravate the progression of precancerous lesions: a new biosafety insight. Stem Cell Res. Therapy 9, 137 (2018).
Schmittgen, T. D. & Livak, K. J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.73 (2008).
Wang, T., Li, B., Nelson, C. E. & Nabavi, S. Comparative analysis of differential gene expression analysis tools for single-cell RNA sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 40–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2599-6 (2019).
Colaprico, A. et al. TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e71–e71. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1507 (2016).
Mayakonda, A., Lin, D.-C., Assenov, Y., Plass, C. & Koeffler, H. P. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res 28, 1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.239244.118 (2018).
Acknowledgements
To Instituto Nacional del Cancer Chile; CIICOM; Clínica Montes; SEMEB, Facultad de Odontología, UNCuyo; IMBECU CCT-Mendoza CONICET; CMR, UDD-CAS; Facultad de Odontología, UMayor. The authors thanks to Mehdi Bouikech for the english proof reading.
Funding
This work was supported by: PI UDD-CAS N20141001185304708249 grant (FAB); Foundation JA Roemmers (FAB) and Project FDP Universidad Mayor RFR (PEP I-2019081) (RFR) and Project FONDECYT n 11140281 (RFR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors of the present work have made substantial contribution to the article. R.F.R. and F.A.B. contributed to the conception and design of the work. F.A.B. wrote the main manuscript text. G.P., F.V.G., W.A.G.A., H.F.M., J.M.R.P., V.A.G., S.E.G., R.F.R. and F.A.B. contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data obtained from patient’s biopsies. R.F.R. and F.A.B. prepared Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5. M.E.G.G., J.M.F.M. and F.C.M.Z. contributed to the database acquisition, in silico analysis and interpretation of TGCA data obtained from the USA Cancer Atlas and prepared the Fig. 3. R.F.R., F.A.B., M.E.E. and R.W.C. contributed with the discussion section. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pennacchiotti, G., Valdés-Gutiérrez, F., González-Arriagada, W.A. et al. SPINK7 expression changes accompanied by HER2, P53 and RB1 can be relevant in predicting oral squamous cell carcinoma at a molecular level. Sci Rep 11, 6939 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86208-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86208-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.