Abstract
The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) imparts properties of cancer stem-like cells, including resistance to frequently used chemotherapies, necessitating the identification of molecules that induce cell death specifically in stem-like cells with EMT properties. Herein, we demonstrate that breast cancer cells enriched for EMT features are more sensitive to cytotoxicity induced by ophiobolin A (OpA), a sesterterpenoid natural product. Using a model of experimentally induced EMT in human mammary epithelial (HMLE) cells, we show that EMT is both necessary and sufficient for OpA sensitivity. Moreover prolonged, sub-cytotoxic exposure to OpA is sufficient to suppress EMT-imparted CSC features including sphere formation and resistance to doxorubicin. In vivo growth of CSC-rich mammary cell tumors, is suppressed by OpA treatment. These data identify a driver of EMT-driven cytotoxicity with significant potential for use either in combination with standard chemotherapy or for tumors enriched for EMT features.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Breast cancer patients who have triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) face poor prognoses driven by high rates of metastasis and early recurrence1,2,3,4,5,6. TNBC is characterized as histologically negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and amplified human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), preventing the use of hormone- or HER2-targeted therapies. Instead, treatment with anthracycline (doxorubicin) and/or taxanes is capable of providing 5-year survival in only about half of TNBC patients7,8,9,10.
TNBC is comprised of mostly basal-like and claudin-low intrinsic subtypes, both of which have been characterized as enriched for cancer stem-like cells11,12,13. Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are defined by their ability to re-initiate tumor growth upon transplantation and are hypothesized to fuel metastasis and primary tumor recurrence, resulting in an overall decrease in survival14,15,16,17. To improve TNBC patient outcomes, novel and specific approaches targeted at CSCs are needed.
One proposed mechanism driving the emergence of CSC-like cells is the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)16,18. EMT is a trans-differentiation process characterized by acquisition of a spindle-like morphology, loss of apical-basal polarity, increased motility, and a tolerance to anoikis. These phenotypic shifts are driven by gene expression changes mediated by transcription factors SNAIL (SNAI1), TWIST (TWIST1), and ZEB1, effects of which include upregulation of vimentin and downregulation of epithelial markers E-cadherin (CDH1) and miR-200c19,20,21,22,23,24,25.
Cells that have undergone an EMT typically acquire CSC properties including decreased sensitivity to conventional chemotherapies used to treat TNBC. This chemoresistance is driven by drug efflux pumps, enhanced DNA repair capacity, and epigenetic changes16,26,27,28,29,30,31. There are currently no approved therapies that specifically target CSCs. A leading pre-clinical compound is salinomycin, reported to decrease the sub-population of CSCs, tumor initiating capability, and chemoresistance, with negligible side effects32. Other naturally occurring compounds such as curcumin and quercetin have been reported to reduce the effects of EMT by inhibiting key proteins associated with migration (SNAIL, MMP-2/9), anoikis tolerance (BCL2), cell-to-cell adhesion (N-cadherin), and signaling cascades (JAK/STAT, ERK)33,34,35,36. This breadth illustrates the potential for applying natural products to persistent issues in oncology.
Ophiobolin A (OpA) is a natural product produced by fungi in the genera Aspergillus, Bipolaris, Cephalosporium, Cochliobolus, and Drechslera37. This sesterterpenoid (25-carbons) is a secondary metabolite that has long been studied for its phytotoxic effects in a variety of plants and has begun to be evaluated for its anti-cancer properties 37. Published cell culture-based experiments describe a role for OpA in motility inhibition38, membrane depolarization39,40,41,42, roles in inflammation43, and reduction in stemness44. In vivo data demonstrate that OpA is tolerated in mice and is effective in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma39,45,46. Herein, we investigated the applicability of OpA on EMT-enriched breast cancer and found that experimentally induced EMT enhances the susceptibility of mammary epithelial cells to OpA-induced cell death. Furthermore, breast cancer cell lines treated with OpA experience loss of EMT-associated stemness attributes, demonstrating that OpA induces selective cytotoxicity in cells that have undergone EMT. Additionally, OpA is effective in reducing tumor burden in mice with orthotopic, EMT-positive, mammary tumors, highlighting the potential of EMT-targeted cancer treatment.
Results
Mammary epithelial cells that have undergone EMT are more sensitive to OpA
Given the previously published link between OpA and CSC-targeted activity44, we investigated a potential link between OpA and EMT using an experimental model of EMT induction. Immortalized human mammary epithelial (HMLE) cells have an epithelial morphology (Fig. 1A) and express E-cadherin (Sup Fig. 1A). We used HMLE cells, as well as HMLE cells transformed with the Ras oncoprotein (HMLER) that are induced to undergo EMT through lentiviral transduction of the EMT-inducing transcription factor (TF) TWIST25,47, resulting in the acquisition of a mesenchymal morphology (Fig. 1A) and protein expression (Sup Fig. 1A). TWIST expression also induces stemness properties including a greater prevalence of cells expressing high levels of CD44 and low levels of CD24 (CD44hi/CD24lo) (Sup Fig. 1B) and an increased sphere formation efficiency (Sup Fig. 1C)16,25. To identify EMT-selective, highly active molecules, we measured the level of TWIST-induced sensitivity to molecules shown to inhibit CSC properties including salinomycin48, OpA44, curcumin49, genistein50, and disulfiram51. Only two such molecules demonstrated selectivity towards EMT-positive cells, salinomycin and OpA, and only OpA also demonstrated consistently sub-micromolar cytotoxic activity (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, induction of EMT through expression of TWIST or through another EMT-TF, SNAIL52, in either HMLE or HMLER cells increased sensitivity to OpA-driven cytotoxicity (Fig. 1C). Indeed, EMT decreased the IC50 value from a mean of 137–147 nM for epithelial cells to a mean of 85–91 nM for mesenchymal cells (Fig. 1D). These results stand in stark contrast to EMT-driven resistance to many commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs including doxorubicin and staurosporine (Sup Fig. 1D).
miR-200c suppression is necessary for sensitivity to OpA
Because we observed that OpA selectively impacts cells that have undergone EMT, we next evaluated whether reversing the EMT status of these cells would be sufficient to undermine OpA sensitivity. To do this, we introduced an epithelial-specific microRNA into HMLE-TWIST cells. miR-200c expression has been shown to be sufficient to reverse EMT and associated CSC features53. First, we verified over-expression of miR-200c in HMLE Twist cells (Fig. 2A) and confirmed the expected effects on the prevalence of CD44hi/CD24lo cells (Sup Fig S2A) and sphere formation (Sup Fig. 2B). We next measured sensitivity to OpA and found that induction of miR-200c partially compromised sensitivity to OpA (Fig. 2B). This indicates that miR-200c-driven suppression of the CSC state impacts sensitivity to OpA.
Persistent treatment with OpA alters cellular phenotypes
Triple-negative breast cancer cell lines of the basal-like or claudin-low subtype typically exhibit greater EMT and CSC features54. To examine the effect of OpA on breast cancer cells, we measured the cytotoxic activity on the ER-positive, CSC-poor, epithelial-like MCF7 and triple-negative, CSC-rich, mesenchymal-like MDA-MB-231 cell lines. While both cell lines were highly responsive to an elevated dose of OpA (400 nM), the MDA-MB-231 cells displayed significantly greater cell death at an 80 nM dose, compared to MCF7 cells (Fig. 3A). We next considered whether exposure to OpA, in addition to exerting a cytotoxic effect, might also abrogate EMT and CSC-associated cell phenotypes. To evaluate the impact of sub-cytotoxic doses of OpA on EMT and CSC phenotypes, we performed experiments on CSC-rich MDA-MB-231 cells using continuous, multi-day treatment of 30 nM OpA, 100 nM OpA, (Fig. 3B—blue and purple arrows, respectively), or vehicle. Continuous treatment with a sub-cytotoxic doses of OpA triggered modest changes in cell morphology toward a more compact and cobblestone-like appearance, characteristic of epithelial cells (Fig. 3C). To evaluate the effect on EMT, we measured markers of EMT following exposure to OpA. Cells treated with 100 nM OpA, but not 30 nM, showed increased expression of CDH1 (E-cadherin) and decreased expression of CDH2 (N-cadherin), indicative of a partial EMT reversion (Fig. 3D,E). As EMT is necessary for the migratory capacity of MDA-MB-231 cells, we ascertained whether OpA could inhibit migration using a wound healing assay. Consistent with an effect on EMT properties, cells pre-treated with sub-cytotoxic doses of OpA failed to migrate in response to a scratch wound (Fig. 3F). We next measured the effect of OpA on anchorage-independent growth using a mammosphere assay and on the prevalence of CSC-associated CD44hi/CD24lo cells. Consistent with an effect on CSC properties, we observed that pre-treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with OpA reduced sphere formation (Fig. 3G). While pre-treatment at 30 nM had no effect on the prevalence of CD44hi/CD24lo cells, pre-treatment at 100 nM had a minor, though statistically significant effect (Fig. 3H). In summary, persistent treatment of a CSC-rich breast cancer cell line with OpA diminishes sphere formation and migratory properties associates with CSC and EMT.
OpA treatment increases sensitivity to chemotherapy
EMT-promoted stemness drives resistance to commonly used chemotherapies. One approach to overcoming this problem is to consider dual-treatment therapies that combine CSC-targeting compounds with conventional drugs. To examine the relationship between EMT and the combinatorial impact of OpA treatment, we co-treated cells with a dilution series of OpA and either doxorubicin or paclitaxel. Co-treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with as little as 12.5 nM OpA enhanced the cytotoxic response from doxorubicin (Fig. 4A), while 50 nM OpA enhanced the cytotoxic response from paclitaxel (Sup. Fig. 3A). Notably, addition of 50 nM OpA was sufficient to maintain cytotoxic activity despite a 25-fold reduction in the dose of doxorubicin (Fig. 4A-orange bar) and a fivefold reduction in the dose of paclitaxel (Sup. Fig. 3A-orange bar).When analyzed using Combenefit55, these dose combinations tended toward synergistic effects (Fig. 4B, Sup. Fig. 3B). Combination treatment using the synthetic derivative, 3-deoxy-OpA (Sup. Fig. 3C) did not result in altered activity (Sup. Fig. 3D–F). To test whether the EMT state or degree of CSC enrichment was relevant for synergistic activity of OpA and doxorubicin, we performed combination treatment analysis on MCF7, HMLE vector and HMLE TWIST cells. MCF7 cells displayed less synergy and more antagonism than MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 4C). HMLE vector cells treated with OpA and doxorubicin also exhibited strong antagonism which was diminished in the HMLE TWIST cells (Fig. 4D,E). The capacity of OpA to act in concert with clinically useful chemotherapeutic agents indicates that co-treatment may be useful to more effectively treat breast cancer.
OpA is tolerated in vivo and suppresses growth of mammary cell tumors with exogenous TWIST-expression
We next assessed whether OpA treatment alone is sufficient to reduce growth of a mammary cell tumor, which is composed exclusively of EMT-positive cells, in mice. As such, immunocompromised mice were orthotopically injected with Ras-transformed HMLE cells constitutively expressing the TWIST transcription factor to induce EMT (HMLER-TWIST). Following the emergence of palpable tumors, mice were randomly assigned to either the control (DMSO diluted into saline) or OpA treatment groups. Thrice weekly injections for 3 weeks consisting of 10 mg/kg of OpA were not well tolerated as mice exhibited weight loss greater than 20% of initial body weight and two adverse outcomes were recorded prior to the final dose (Fig. 5A). However, a dose of 5 mg/kg was better tolerated with weight loss less than 15% and one adverse outcome, while a dose of 2.5 mg/kg had no statistically significant impact on body weight (Fig. 5A). A dose of 5 mg/kg of OpA was sufficient to significantly suppress the growth of HMLER-TWIST tumors (Fig. 5B) and to reduce the endpoint tumor volume of HMLER-TWIST tumors (Fig. 5C). We sought to ascertain whether OpA treatment contributes to increased cell death within treated tumor tissue by staining for cleaved caspase-3, a marker of apoptosis. Unexpectedly, staining for cleaved caspase-3 in the primary tumors revealed no significant difference between untreated and OpA-treated mice (Sup. Fig. 4). However, OpA has been shown to induce non-apoptotic cell death in other models39,56. Because HMLER-TWIST tumors metastasize to the lung and other organs25, we analyzed lungs from OpA-treated mice to determine if metastatic burden was reduced. Despite the observed effects on migration in vitro, there was no significant reduction in lung metastatic burden associated with OpA treatment (Sup. Fig. 4).
Discussion
Currently, conventional chemotherapeutic drugs are able to elicit high response rates in about half of TNBC patients; however, the remaining patients eventually develop progressive disease2, with some even experiencing more aggressive and CSC-rich tumors after therapy14,57. Identification of molecules with specificity for CSC-rich cell populations will facilitate the development of novel therapies and may improve responses to currently available therapies.
While several other natural products have been linked to CSC-targeting33,34,48,58,59,60,61,62,63, our work highlights a natural product that selectively kills breast CSCs exhibiting EMT features. Further, we show a reduction of EMT phenotypes such as migration, as well as reduction in sphere-forming capacity and changes to CSC-rich subpopulations in a TNBC cell model. Extending OpA’s efficacy in reducing CSC-related properties, our data suggest increased sensitivity to conventional chemotherapeutics doxorubicin and paclitaxel when co-treated with OpA. Finally, we evaluate the efficacy of OpA in vivo and show suppressed growth of an EMT-positive, primary tumor.
Evolution-driven selection of natural products imparts biological activities useful for disease treatment and which may not be mimicked by selective kinase inhibitors. Other successful natural products that have driven cancer therapies include taxol, vinblastin, anthracyclines, daunomycin and doxorubicin64. Several studies39,41,42,46,65,66,67,68 have evaluated one such natural product, OpA, in cancer settings, predominantly using in vitro models, and, similar to our present study, these studies report IC50 values in the low nanomolar range. Our work is one of the first to evaluate OpA in vivo and is the first to describe the impact of EMT on OpA sensitivity. By focusing on the effects on EMT and stemness phenotypes, this work opens the door for the discovery of essential molecular pathways and for the investigation of OpA derivatives as a future cancer treatment.
Materials and methods
Cell lines
MCF7, and MDA-MB-231, were received from ATCC; HMLE, HMLER, HMLE Snail, HMLER Snail, HMLE TWIST, and HMLER TWIST were kindly gifted from Dr. Sendurai Mani (MD Anderson Cancer Center). Breast cancer cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (Corning Inc., Kennebuck, ME, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Equitech-Bio Inc., Kerrville, Texas, USA) and 1X antibiotics (Penicillin/Streptomycin, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Immortalized human mammary epithelial cells (HMLE) and derivatives were maintained as in Elenbaas et al.69. Cell lines were tested monthly for mycoplasma and validated via STR testing. Incubation occurred at 37 °C with 5% CO2. miR-200c overexpression was generated using lentiviral transduction of pCMV-MIR (Origene Rockville, MD). Transduced cells were selected using puromycin.
Reagents
Curcumin, genestein, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel were obtained from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA), salinomycin from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI USA), and disulfiram from Tocris Bioscience, (Bristol, UK). OpA was produced by fermentation of the fungus D. gigantea. It was extracted from the fungal culture filtrates, purified, crystallized and identified by 1H NMR and ESI MS spectra as previously reported70. The purity of OpA was > 98% as ascertained by 1H NMR and HPLC analyses.
3-Deoxy OpA was synthesized from ophiobolin I71,72 which was also obtained through fermentation as previously reported70. A two-step synthetic sequence involving conjugate reduction of the enone which proceeded with high diastereoselectivity (> 19:1 by 600 MHz 1H NMR) followed by a Ru(IV)-mediated oxidation of the primary alcohol to the aldehyde delivered 3-deoxy OpA. It should be noted that the methyl group at C3 is epimeric with respect to the C3-methyl group in OpA. However, the importance of the C3-hydroxy group and/or the stereochemistry of this methyl group was verified through studies described below and 3-deoxy OpA served as a negative control. Further details are provided in Supplemental Figure 5.
Viability
Cells were plated with 2000 cells per well in a 96-well plate and allowed to adhere overnight. Compounds, suspended in DMSO and diluted into PBS, or vehicle were added to the culture medium and incubated for 72 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Following manufacturer suggested protocol, 20 µL CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added and incubated 1–4 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a 96-well plate reader (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA).
RNA extraction and detection
Cells were lysed in the presence of Trizol® Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and total RNA extracted following manufacturer protocol recommendations. Relative quantification of the mRNA levels was performed using the comparative Ct method with the formula 2−ΔΔCt. For microRNA analysis small nucleolar RNA U6 was used for normalization while for mRNA analysis GAPDH was used for normalization, Taqman and SYBR PCR Master Mixes were obtained from Applied Biosystems (Thermo Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA). All quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) experiments were run in technical quadruplicates and biological triplicates and a mean value was used for the determination of mRNA levels.
Western blotting and antibodies
Cells were lysed in the presence of 100 µl radio-immunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer containing protease inhibitors (Alfa Aesar, Stoughton, MA, USA) on ice. Protein was quantified using the Bradford Assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Twenty micrograms of total protein from each sample was resolved on a 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to PVDF membranes. Sister blots were then probed with antibodies including anti-E-cadherin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-vimentin (Protein Technologies, Tucson, AZ, USA), or anti-β-actin (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) antibody. Chemiluminescent signals were detected with ECL™ prime (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the Biorad ChemiDoc system. If necessary, blots were stripped with ECL Stripping Buffer (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NB, USA) following manufacturer protocol. Bands were quantified using ImageJ.
Mammosphere assay
Cells were harvested and suspended in serum-free mammary epithelial growth medium (MEGM) supplemented with 1% methyl cellulose, 20 ng/mL FGF, 10 ng/mL EGF, and 4 μg/mL heparin. Cells were plated in 4 replicates in a flat-bottom ultra-low attachment 96-well plate (Corning) and allowed to grow at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 10–14 days and were monitored microscopically to ensure that they did not become confluent during the experiment. 100 µL low-attachment media was added every 3–4 days. Wells were imaged using 4× magnification on a computer-assisted phase contrast microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Spheres larger than 100 µm were counted.
Flow cytometry
For flow cytometry, cells were harvested, counted and 105 cells were incubated with 5 µl of either CD44 (BV421 Mouse Anti-Human CD44 # 562890; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and/or CD24 (PE-Mouse Anti-human CD24 #555428; BD Biosciences) in PBS with 1% serum for 1 h on ice, minimizing light exposure. Cells were then pelleted at low-speed and washed with PBS with 1% serum twice before measurement of fluorescence using BD FACS Melody (BD Biosciences).
Migration
For migration assay, cells were serum-starved overnight and scratch wounds were created using a sterile pipette tip on the cell monolayer or by plating cells in 2-well culture inserts (Ibidi, Madison, WI). Cell migration rates were determined by measuring the distance between cell fronts after the indicated number of days in culture. The distance between the two edges at multiple points was quantified using ImageJ at the indicated timepoints.
Co-treatment and interaction
Cells were treated with compound or matched-percentage DMSO or other vehicle in serial dilutions and incubated for 72 h before measuring viability using MTS (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Interactions were quantified using the Combenefit program with the Loewe model and dose–response surface mapping55.
Tumor growth
Female Scid/bg (CB17.Cg-PrkdcscidLystbg-J/Crl) mice (5–8 weeks old) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Animals were maintained under clean room conditions in sterile filter top cages with autoclaved bedding and housed on high efficiency particulate air–filtered ventilated racks. Animals received sterile rodent chow and acidified water ad libitum. All of the procedures were conducted in accordance with the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and with Baylor University Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. HMLER-TWIST cells were harvested, pelleted by centrifugation at 2000×g for 2 min, and resuspended in sterile serum-free medium supplemented with 30% to 50% Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Cells (2 × 106 in 100 µl aliquots) were implanted into the left fourth mammary fat of each mouse and allowed to grow until measurable by caliper. Then, OpA or vehicle was administered by intraperitoneal injection three times weekly for 3 weeks at 2.5 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg. Tumor volume and body weight were recorded concurrently with injection protocol73. At designated times, mice were humanely euthanized, and tumors and lungs were collected. Experiments were approved by Baylor University IACUC (#1441130). This study was carried out in compliance with ARRIVE guidelines (http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1357).
Tissue staining
Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. The Leica Bond Max automated platform was used to perform the immunohistochemistry. The antibodies used were as follows: Caspase 3 Lot#GR3265151-4 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Antibodies were diluted at 1:1000.
Statistical analysis
Unless otherwise stated, statistical differences were determined using a student’s t-test. The GraphPad PRISM software v6 was used to perform these analyses. Statistical significance levels are annotated as n.s. = non-significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
References
Carey, L. A. et al. The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 2329–2334. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1109 (2007).
Cortazar, P. & Geyer, C. E. Pathological complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22, 1441–1446. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4404-8 (2015).
Foulkes, W. D., Smith, I. E. & Reis-Filho, J. S. Triple-negative breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 363, 1938–1948. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1001389 (2010).
Haddad, T. C. & Goetz, M. P. Landscape of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22, 1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4405-7 (2015).
Liedtke, C. et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 1275–1281. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4147 (2008).
Symmans, W. F. et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 4414–4422. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6823 (2007).
Chacón, R. D. & Costanzo, M. V. Triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 12(Suppl 2), S3. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2574 (2010).
Hudis, C. A. & Gianni, L. Triple-negative breast cancer: An unmet medical need. Oncologist 16(Suppl 1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-S1-01 (2011).
Mustacchi, G. & De Laurentiis, M. The role of taxanes in triple-negative breast cancer: Literature review. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 9, 4303–4318. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S86105 (2015).
Wu, J., Li, S., Jia, W. & Su, F. Response and prognosis of taxanes and anthracyclines neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 137, 1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-011-1029-6 (2011).
Dent, R. et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 4429–4434. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045 (2007).
Hennessy, B. T. et al. Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics. Can. Res. 69, 4116–4124. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3441 (2009).
Prat, A. & Perou, C. M. Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol. Oncol. 5, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2010.11.003 (2011).
Creighton, C. J. et al. Residual breast cancers after conventional therapy display mesenchymal as well as tumor-initiating features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 13820–13825. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905718106 (2009).
Echeverria, G. V. et al. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer mediated by a reversible drug-tolerant state. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav0936. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav0936 (2019).
Mani, S. A. et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 133, 704–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027 (2008).
Lawson, D. A. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals a stem-cell program in human metastatic breast cancer cells. Nature 526, 131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15260 (2015).
Morel, A. P. et al. Generation of breast cancer stem cells through epithelial-mesenchymal transition. PLoS ONE 3, e2888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002888 (2008).
Burk, U. et al. A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 9, 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.74 (2008).
Hollier, B. G. et al. FOXC2 expression links epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cell properties in breast cancer. Can. Res. 73, 1981–1992. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2962 (2013).
Korpal, M., Lee, E. S., Hu, G. & Kang, Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14910–14914. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C800074200 (2008).
Mani, S. A. et al. Mesenchyme Forkhead 1 (FOXC2) plays a key role in metastasis and is associated with aggressive basal-like breast cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 10069–10074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703900104 (2007).
Park, S. M., Gaur, A. B., Lengyel, E. & Peter, M. E. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 22, 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1640608 (2008).
Wellner, U. et al. The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1487–1495. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1998 (2009).
Yang, J. et al. Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell 117, 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.006 (2004).
Bao, S. D. et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 444, 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05236 (2006).
Hirschmann-Jax, C. et al. A distinct “side population” of cells with high drug efflux capacity in human tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 14228–14233. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400067101 (2004).
Sharma, S. V. et al. A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell 141, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.027 (2010).
Singh, A. & Settleman, J. EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: An emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer. Oncogene 29, 4741–4751. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.215 (2010).
Voulgari, A. & Pintzas, A. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis: Mechanisms, markers and strategies to overcome drug resistance in the clinic. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1796, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.03.002 (2009).
Witta, S. E. et al. Restoring E-cadherin expression increases sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in lung cancer cell lines. Can. Res. 66, 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1988 (2006).
Naujokat, C. & Steinhart, R. Salinomycin as a drug for targeting human cancer stem cells. BioMed Res. Int. 2012, 950658, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/950658.
Li, Y. & Zhang, T. Targeting cancer stem cells by curcumin and clinical applications. Cancer Lett. 346, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.01.012 (2014).
Liu, H.-T. & Ho, Y.-S. Anticancer effect of curcumin on breast cancer and stem cells. Food Sci. Human Wellness 7, 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.06.001 (2018).
Takebe, N. et al. Targeting Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: Clinical update. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 12, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.61 (2015).
Seo, H. S. et al. Quercetin induces caspase-dependent extrinsic apoptosis through inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling in HER2-overexpressing BT-474 breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 36, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4786 (2016).
Masi, M., Dasari, R., Evidente, A., Mathieu, V. & Kornienko, A. Chemistry and biology of ophiobolin A and its congeners. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 29, 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.02.007 (2019).
Bencsik, O. et al. Ophiobolin A from bipolaris oryzae perturbs motility and membrane integrities of porcine sperm and induces cell death on mammalian somatic cell lines. Toxins 6, 2857–2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6092857 (2014).
Bury, M. et al. Ophiobolin A induces paraptosis-like cell death in human glioblastoma cells by decreasing BKCa channel activity. Cell Death Dis. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2013.85 (2013).
Cocucci, S. M., Morgutti, S., Cocucci, M. & Gianani, L. Effects of ophiobolin A on potassium permeability, transmembrane electrical potential and proton extrusion in maize roots. Plant Sci. Lett. 32, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4211(83)90093-7 (1983).
Kim, I. Y. et al. Ophiobolin A kills human glioblastoma cells by inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress via disruption of thiol proteostasis. Oncotarget https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22537 (2017).
Rodolfo, C. et al. Ophiobolin A induces autophagy and activates the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in human melanoma cells. PLoS ONE 11, e0167672. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167672 (2016).
Pósa, A. et al. The effect of acute ophiobolin A treatment on HO-mediated inflammatory processes. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 36, 594–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327116658107 (2017).
Najumudeen, A. K. et al. Cancer stem cell drugs target K-ras signaling in a stemness context. Oncogene 35, 5248–5262. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2016.59 (2016).
Au, T. K., Chick, W. S. H. & Leung, P. C. The biology of ophiobolins. Life Sci. 67, 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00668-8 (2000).
Dasari, R. et al. Fungal metabolite ophiobolin A as a promising anti-glioma agent: In vivo evaluation, structure–activity relationship and unique pyrrolylation of primary amines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 4544–4548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.08.066 (2015).
Malouf, G. G. et al. Architecture of epigenetic reprogramming following Twist1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Genome Biol. 14, R144. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r144 (2013).
Gupta, P. B. et al. Identification of selective inhibitors of cancer stem cells by high-throughput screening. Cell 138, 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.034 (2009).
Yoon, M. J., Kim, E. H., Lim, J. H., Kwon, T. K. & Choi, K. S. Superoxide anion and proteasomal dysfunction contribute to curcumin-induced paraptosis of malignant breast cancer cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 48, 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.12.016 (2010).
Fan, P. et al. Genistein decreases the breast cancer stem-like cell population through Hedgehog pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 4, 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt357 (2013).
Hothi, P. et al. High-throughput chemical screens identify disulfiram as an inhibitor of human glioblastoma stem cells. Oncotarget https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.707 (2012).
Cano, A. et al. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/35000025 (2000).
Shimono, Y. et al. Downregulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells. Cell 138, 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.011 (2009).
Taube, J. H. et al. Core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition interactome gene-expression signature is associated with claudin-low and metaplastic breast cancer subtypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107, 15449–15454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004900107 (2010).
Di Veroli, G. Y. et al. Combenefit: An interactive platform for the analysis and visualization of drug combinations. Bioinformatics 32, 2866–2868. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw230 (2016).
Morrison, R., Lodge, T., Evidente, A., Kiss, R. & Townley, H. Ophiobolin A, a sesterpenoid fungal phytotoxin, displays different mechanisms of cell death in mammalian cells depending upon the cancer cell origin. Int. J. Oncol. 50, 773–786 (2017).
Hu, X. et al. Induction of cancer cell stemness by chemotherapy. Cell Cycle 11, 2691–2698. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.21021 (2012).
An, H. et al. Salinomycin promotes anoikis and decreases the CD44+/CD24− stem-like population via inhibition of STAT3 activation in MDA-MB-231 cells. PLoS ONE 10, e0141919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141919 (2015).
Dewangan, J., Srivastava, S. & Rath, S. K. Salinomycin: A new paradigm in cancer therapy. Tumor Biol. 39, 101042831769503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317695035 (2017).
Dominguez-Gomez, G. et al. Ivermectin as an inhibitor of cancer stem-like cells. Mol. Med. Rep. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.8231 (2017).
Kuo, S. Z. et al. Salinomycin induces cell death and differentiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma stem cells despite activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and Akt. BMC Cancer 12, 556. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-556 (2012).
Lu, Y. et al. Salinomycin exerts anticancer effects on human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cancer stem cells via modulation of Hedgehog signaling. Chem. Biol. Interact. 228, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2014.12.002 (2015).
Zhou, Q. et al. Curcumin improves the tumoricidal effect of mitomycin C by suppressing ABCG2 expression in stem cell-like breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 10, e0136694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136694 (2015).
Newman, D. J. & Cragg, G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 79, 629–661. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055 (2016).
Bhatia, D. R. et al. Anticancer activity of Ophiobolin A, isolated from the endophytic fungus Bipolaris setariae. Nat. Prod. Res. 30, 1455–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2015.1062760 (2016).
Chidley, C., Trauger, S. A., Birsoy, K. & O’Shea, E. K. The anticancer natural product ophiobolin A induces cytotoxicity by covalent modification of phosphatidylethanolamine. Elife 5, e14601. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14601 (2016).
Choi, B.-K. et al. New ophiobolin derivatives from the marine fungus aspergillus flocculosus and their cytotoxicities against cancer cells. Mar. Drugs 17, 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17060346 (2019).
Tian, W., Deng, Z. X. & Hong, K. The biological activities of sesterterpenoid-type ophiobolins. Mar. Drugs https://doi.org/10.3390/md15070229 (2017).
Elenbaas, B. et al. Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells. Genes Dev. 15, 50–65 (2001).
Evidente, A. et al. Herbicidal potential of ophiobolins produced by Drechslera gigantea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 1779–1783. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052843l (2006).
Sugawara, F. et al. Phytotoxins from the pathogenic fungi Drechslera maydis and Drechslera sorghicola. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84, 3081–3085. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.10.3081 (1987).
Sugawara, F. et al. Some new phytotoxic ophiobolins produced by Drechslera oryzae. J. Org. Chem. 53, 2170–2172. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00245a008 (1988).
Faustino-Rocha, A. et al. Estimation of rat mammary tumor volume using caliper and ultrasonography measurements. Lab. Anim. 42, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.254 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the entire Taube Lab for invaluable discussion and advice. Also, we appreciate the assistance of Dr. Igor Bado (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA) for advice regarding Combenefit. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Michelle Nemec, Director of the Molecular Bioscience Center (Baylor University) for assistance with flow cytometry and Dr. Maria Boccia (Baylor University) and Dr. Gerard Nuovo (Discovery Life Sciences, Powell, OH, USA) for assistance with immunohistochemistry. The authors also thank Dr. Maurizio Vurro (Institute of Sciences and Food Production, CNR, Bari, Italy) for the supply of Drechslera gigantea culture filtrates. This work was supported by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, grant #RP180771 to J.H.T. and D.R. and by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, grant #R35 GM134910 to D.R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experiments performed by K.N.R. with contributions from S.S., P.D., P.S., S.P., H.S., S.M., and A.I. Isolation and characterization of ophiobolins by M.M., A.B., A.E., and A.K. Novel chemical syntheses by Y.T. and D.R. Study design, manuscript drafting by K.N.R. and J.H.T., with editing by D.R. and A.K. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Reisenauer, K.N., Tao, Y., Das, P. et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition sensitizes breast cancer cells to cell death via the fungus-derived sesterterpenoid ophiobolin A. Sci Rep 11, 10652 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89923-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89923-9
This article is cited by
-
Anticancer plant-derivatives: deciphering their oncopreventive and therapeutic potential in molecular terms
Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.