The tumour microenvironment includes various diverse immune cell types, each of which might influence tumour progression and response to treatment, particularly with immunotherapies. These cell types include different subtypes of B lymphocytes, which are often associated with tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) and can have pro-tumour or anti-tumour effects, either through their classical function in antibody production and antigen presentation or other mechanisms. Herein, Fridman et al. discuss the phenotypic heterogeneity of intratumoural B cells and the importance of TLS in their generation, the potential of B cells and TLS as prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers, and novel approaches aiming to enhance the development of TLS and anti-tumour B cells for cancer therapy.

Several PI3K pathway inhibitors are currently approved as cancer treatments; however, finding an acceptable therapeutic window to target this key signalling cascade linking cancer growth with metabolism has proven challenging and the clinical results to date have arguably been disappointing. In this Review, Vasan and Cantley discuss the effects of PI3K pathway alterations on signalling and metabolism in solid tumours as well as past and present efforts to improve the somewhat limited clinical efficacy of PI3K pathway inhibitors, with a particular focus on PI3Kα in breast cancers.

In the past decade, treatment devices that combine imaging with targeted irradiation have been developed to deliver MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT). This treatment modality uses motion management and biological targeting to improve local control rates whilst reducing the radiation delivered to non-malignant tissues. The authors of this Review describe the current state of MRIgRT, and the opportunities and challenges of this radiotherapy approach.

In this Perspective, Nathan Cherny appraises the FDA approvals of therapeutic agents granted for use in adult patients with solid tumours during the 5 years 2017–2021 against the aspirations of the Cancer Moonshot, in terms of sheer number of approvals, the strength of the supporting evidence and the magnitude of clinical benefit. He also outlines areas where improvements are needed to more confidently ensure that the clinical benefits of approved treatments justify the associated risks.

In randomized controlled trials in oncology, changes in quality of life are usually reported together with a description of the differences considered a priori to be clinically important, but overall survival outcomes are rarely provided together with information of what constitutes a clinically meaningful threshold. In this Comment, we propose the benefits that could be derived from reporting overall survival in a similar way to quality of life.

Median overall survival for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma may surpass ten years. Nonetheless, many patients face considerable treatment-related morbidity and relapsed disease. Owing to this typically long overall survival, most multiple myeloma trials now use progression-free survival as their primary end point. In this Comment, we highlight circumstances in which this end point does not best answer the questions that various trials seek to investigate.