Introduction

Crystal engineering and design of solid-state architecture through self-assembly have been gaining much attention in recent years1,2,3,4. Such an approach can lead to the formation of non-covalent bonds ‘at will’ to facilitate the synthesis of large and well-defined molecular architectures and to promote reversible encapsulation5,6,7. In particular, the metal coordination has been represented as a successful strategy for engineering the functional materials, for this method offers the flexibility of using basic molecular building blocks and a cementing metal atom to construct extended coordination networks8,9. One of the most studied systems is displayed by metal atom bridged-porphyrins or phthalocyanine (Pcs), which is also a typical heme unit in both intact heme proteins and model heme systems10,11,12,13. Alternatively, the combination of surface-confined chemistry and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) techniques allows direct insights into supramolecular coordination at the sub-molecular resolution level14,15. Recent studies have demonstrated that pyridines (Pys) are also one of the promising candidates for molecular architecture, due to the strong metal-ligand interaction between nitrogen atom in Py and the metal atoms16,17,18,19. These studies mainly discussed the metal coordination in open nano-scaled environments, that is, the ligand can mobilize freely so as to form varieties of stable assemblies. In contrast, the molecular species in confined space can strongly modify the interaction pathways compared to homogenous and bulk conditions20. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no report on this kind of cavity confined coordination on surface.

Herein, utilizing the intermolecular H-bonded network of 1,3,5-tris(10-carboxydecyloxy) benzene (TCDB) as a template, we have probed the supramolecular coordination of zinc (II) phthalocyanine (Zn-Pc) with 1,3-di(4-pyridyl)propane (dipy-pra) (Figure 1) in the nano-template through the STM technique at liquid/solid interface and what we focus on are the role of the template in the supramolecular coordination process and the supramolecular coordination effects on the host-guest network.

Figure 1
figure 1

Chemical structures of (a) TCDB; (b) Zn-Pc; and (c) dipy-pra.

Results

TCDB can form two-dimensional networks on HOPG with well-defined nano-scaled pores which can immobilize organic molecules such as the coronene and phthalocyanine as well as other macrocycles21, thus it can also be used as a nano-reactor where photo-isomerization of NN-Macrocycles has been studied22,23. Furthermore, the size and geometry of the TCDB network cavities could be modulated to appreciably enhance the adsorption efficiency of the guest molecules, just because of the three flexible alkyl chains and the intermolecular hydrogen bonds24,25.

Prior to investigating the template effect on supramolecular coordination, we firstly immobilize the Zn-Pc into the nanopores of TCDB. Figure 2a shows the well-ordered assembled structure of TCDB/Zn-Pc, from which these two individual molecules can be clearly resolved. Two TCDB molecules fabricate a tetragonal cavity by the alkyl chains connected by intermolecular hydrogen bonds and one X-shaped Zn-Pc molecule is entrapped into the tetragonal cavity (m1 × n1 = 2.0 nm × 1.8 nm).

Figure 2
figure 2

STM images and molecular models.

(a) Assembled structure of TCDB/Zn-Pc. (b) Suggested molecular model for the observed area in (a). (c) Assembled structure of TCDB/Zn-Pc after the dipy-pra molecule was added for 5 minutes. (d) A tentative model for the observed area in (c), the pink part represents the dipy-pra molecules. (e) Assembled structure of TCDB/Zn-Pc after the dipy-pra molecule was added for 20 minutes. (f) The suggested molecular model corresponds to the scanned area in (e), the pink part represents the dipy-pra molecule. (g) Assembled structure of TCDB/Zn-Pc/dipy-pra upon the addition of the HTf solution. Tunneling parameters: Iset = 299.1 pA, Vbias = 600 mV.

To further gain insight into how the Zn-Pc molecules interact with the dipy-pra molecule in TCDB networks, initial growth of supramolecular complex was accomplished. For the system of TCDB/Zn-Pc/dipy-pra, Figures 2c and 2e display two different assembled structures. At first, when introducing the dipy-pra solution, bright “”-shaped complex 1 can be clearly observed 5 minutes later (Figure 2c). Larger than the size of the Zn-Pc molecule ((1.2 ± 0.1) nm × (1.2 ± 0.1) nm), the size of complex 1 in the cavities is measured to be L1 × L2 = (1.6 ± 0.1) nm × (1.6 ± 0.1) nm, showing that the complex 1 is a newly formed compound. As marked in Figure 2c, the bright spot upset (drawn in “Λ”-shaped red characteristic) can be ascribed to the dipy-pra molecule, while the lower layer (drawn in X-shaped blue characteristic) should be the Zn-Pc molecule. Unlike the well-defined TCDB/Zn-Pc system, the co-assembled structure of TCDB/complex 1 seems unstable and shows a random arrangement, which may result from the irregular rotation of the dipy-pra in the complex 1. Interestingly, 20 minutes later, “odd-even” arranged architecture appears (Figure 2e). Along the red arrows, every cavity of TCDB immobilizes one bright “”-shaped molecule which should be attributed to the complex 1, forming the “odd” pattern. While along the blue arrows, every cavity is filled with one bright “\—/”-shaped complex (2), presenting the “even” patterned organization. From Figure 2e, the size of this new complex is measured to be L3 × L4 = (2.9 ± 0.1) nm × (1.7 ± 0.1) nm and two X-shaped Zn-Pc molecules can be clearly resolved in another newly formed individual molecule. Besides, the distance (d) between the centers of two Zn-Pc molecules in the complex 2 is in accordance with the length of one dipy-pra molecule (1.2 ± 0.1 nm), which indicates that the “\—/”-shaped complex 2 should be formed by two Zn-Pc molecules bridging with one dipy-pra molecule. A unit cell (the unit cell parameters: a = 4.8 ± 0.1 nm, b = 4.0 ± 0.1 nm and α = 72 ± 2.0°), consisting of one complex 1 and one complex 2, can be seen in this kind of co-assembled structure (Figure 2f). Moreover, some defects appear in the “even” pattern. As shown in Figure 2g, interestingly, upon addition of some 1-phenyloctane solution containing trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (HTf), this kind of “odd-even” alternately pattern disappears and the original highly ordered TCDB/Zn-Pc and TCDB/complex 1 ( indicated by the dotted circles) system can be regenerated. Due to the salinization of bi-pyridines by HTf26, the interaction between the Zn-Pc and the dipy-pra molecule becomes weaker and the former coordinated Zn-Pc or dipy-pra molecule is released from the supramolecular complexes 2.

Discussion

Based on these observed phenomena and combined with the density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see table 1 and table 2), we suggest that a two-step process may happen during the coordination of Zn-Pc with dipy-pra in the network of the TCDB molecule (Figure 3). Firstly, the Zn-Pc molecule in the cavity connects with one dipy-pra molecule, generating the bright “”-shaped complex 1. At the same time, through stretching of the alkyl chains, the TCDB network will adjust its cavity size (m2 × n2 = 2.1 nm × 1.7 nm) so as to immobilize this new formed complex suitably. To compare the thermal dynamic stability of TCDB/complex 1 and TCDB/complex 2, we have calculated the total energy of the system (see Table 2). Here, the more negative energy means the system is more stable. As described in Table 2, the total energy of TCDB/complex 1 and TCDB/complex 2 is −218.20 kcal mol-1 and −406.06 kcal mol−1, respectively, which indicates the structural transformation from TCDB/complex 1 to TCDB/complex 2 is energetically preferable. Secondly, due to the existence of another non-coordinated pyridine of the dipy-pra molecule, the complex 1 in the nanopores is apt to adsorb another Zn-Pc molecule from solution. Once another Zn-Pc molecule in solution is caught, the alkyl chains of the TCDB molecules should be regulated and extend simultaneously to fabricate much larger cavities. As a result, two kinds of cavities (A and B) are formed. The size of comparatively larger A-type cavity and the smaller B-type cavity is mA = 3.4 nm, nA = 1.7 nm and mB = 2.1 nm, nB = 1.7 nm, respectively. Because of the confinement of the cavity, only A-typed cavity can accommodate two Zn-Pc molecules, that is to say, only cavity A can be used as a reactor for formation of the bright “\—/”-shaped complex 2, whereas the complex 1 in B-typed cavity can not coordinate with another Zn-Pc molecule any more. Moreover, not every complex 1 in A-typed cavity can catch the Zn-Pc molecule from solution, thus the non-coordinated complex 1 can not be well immobilized in the larger cavity A and easily escapes from the TCDB network, resulting in some defects in the “even” pattern.

Table 1 Experimental (Expt.) and calculated (Cal.) lattice parameters for the 2D networks
Table 2 Total energies (Etotal) for the 2D networks. The total energy includes the interaction between adsorbates (TCDB network and the guest molecules) and the interaction between the absorbates and graphite. Here, the guest molecules are Zn-Pc, complex 1 and complex 2.
Figure 3
figure 3

(a) The molecular models for the transformation of the TCDB networks.(b) Presentation for the formations of complex 1 and complex 2 from the Zn-Pc molecule. The pink parts in complex 1 and complex 2 symbolize the dipy-pra molecules.

However, in solution, one Zn-Pc molecule can only coordinate with one dipy-pra molecule through the zinc-pyridine interactions. Beside, displaying in Figure 4, when we perform the coordination of Zn-Pc with dipy-pra (without TCDB) or add the mixed solution of Zn-Pc/dipy-pra into the TCDB networks, we can not directly observe the “odd-even” alternate arrangement27, which well demonstrates that the two-step supramolecular coordination process possibly happens on graphite surface.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) Self-assembled structure of Zn-Pc/dipy-pra (without template).The part indicated by the red arrow is the assembled structure of Zn-Pc molecules and the area (indicated by the green arrows) shows the assembled structure of Zn-Pc/dipy-pra. Without TCDB, the assembled structure of Zn-Pc/dipy-pra is disordered and the "odd-even” nanopattern can not be observed under this case. (b) The coassembled structure of TCDB/Zn-Pc+dipy-pra (upon addition of mixed solution of Zn-Pc and dipy-pra into the TCDB networks). The dotted circles symbolize the few coordinated molecules which can be ascribed to the supramolecular complex 1. Tunnelling parameters are: Iset = 300.0 pA, Vbias = 600.0 mV. These two images show that the TCDB networks regulated the formation of complex 2.

On the other hand, the size and shape of the TCDB cavity have been tuned during the coordination process and such transformation, in turn, affects the coordination process. Especially, the formation of two types of cavities plays a vital role in the generation of the “\—/”-shaped complex 2, which leads to the newly alternate architecture.

In summary, on graphite surface, we have presented an interesting assembled structure initialed by the supramolecular coordination of Zn-Pc with V-shaped bi-pyridine in a flexible molecule template. STM results show that “”-shaped complex 1 and “\—/”-shaped complex 2 are successively produced in the TCDB network and an interesting “odd-even” patterned architecture is generated through a two-step coordination process. In order to well accomadate the supramolecular cmplexes, dramatic changes for the size and the shape of the host cavity can be observed during the coordination process. Based on the DFT calculation, we can see this kind of coordination process is regulated by synergies of ligand and template. Besides, upon the addition of HTf, we found the alternately arranged pattern can be transformed into the original highly ordered assembly. We believe that such a template-regulated supramolecular interconversion will open new avenues towards the crystal engineering and design as well as the generation of controlled nanopatterned architectures.

Methods

Materials

TCDB was synthesized according to the reported procedures21. Zn-Pc, dipy-pra and 1-phenyloctane were purchased from TCI Company, HTf was bought from Aldrich Company and all these materials were used without any purification.

Sample preparation

TCDB, Zn-Pc and dipy-pra were dissolved in 1-phenyloctane with concentration less than 10−4 M. Firstly, a droplet (0.4 μL) of the 1-phenyl octane solution containing TCDB, Zn-Pc and a TCDB/ Zn-Pc mixture (1:1) was deposited respectively onto a freshly cleaved surface (5 mm × 5 mm) of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG, grade ZYB, Advanced Ceramics Inc., Cleveland, USA). A few minutes later, the sample was studied by STM. Secondly, a droplet (0.4 μL) of 1-phenyloctane solution containing dipy-pra (<10−4 M) was added into the studied sample. After 5 minutes and 20 minutes later, the STM investigation was performed. Thirdly, a drop of 1-phenyloctane solution containing HTf (<10−4 M) was applied onto the sample. In the end, after 20 minutes, the STM investigation was performed.

STM investigation

The STM measurements were performed on a Nano IIIa scanning probe microscope system (Bruker, USA) under ambient conditions. All STM images presented were recorded in constant current mode using a mechanically cut Pt/Ir (80/20) tip. The thermal drift was corrected using the underlying graphite lattice as a reference. The latter lattice was visualized by lowering the bias voltage to 60 mV and raising the current to 300 pA. And the "error values" on the lattice paramers are obtained by the statistical method.

Computational details

The theoretical calculation was performed using density functional theory (DFT) provided by the DMol3 code28,29,30. The Perdew and Wang parameterization31 of the local exchange correlation energy are applied in the local spin density approximation (LSDA) to describe exchange and correlation. We expanded the all-electron spin-unrestricted Kohn-Sham wave functions in a local atomic orbital basis. In such double-numerical basis set polarization was described. All calculations were all-electron ones and performed with the Extra-Fine mesh. Self-consistent field procedure was done with a convergence criterion of 10−5 a.u. on the energy and electron density.