Abstract
By linking semiconductor physics and wetting phenomena a brand new effect termed “photoelectrowetting-on-semiconductors” is demonstrated here for a conducting droplet resting on an insulator-semiconductor stack. Optical generation of carriers in the space-charge region of the underlying semiconductor alters the capacitance of the liquid-insulator-semiconductor stack; the result of this is a modification of the wetting contact angle of the droplet upon illumination using above band gap light. The effect is demonstrated using commercial silicon wafers, both n- and p-type having a doping range spanning four orders of magnitude (6×1014−8×1018 cm−3), coated with a commercial amorphous fluoropolymer insulating film (Teflon®). Impedance measurements confirm that the observations are semiconductor space-charge related effects. The impact of the work could lead to new silicon-based technologies in areas such as Laboratory-on-a-Chip, Microfluidics and Optofluidics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Liquid transport in microchip-based systems1,2,3,4,5,6,7 is important in many areas such as Laboratory-on-a-chip8, Microfluidics9 and Optofluidics10. Actuation of liquids in such systems is usually achieved using either mechanical displacement11 e.g. pumping or via energy conversion e.g. electrowetting12,13,14,15 which modifies wetting. However, at the moment there is no clear way of actuating a liquid using light. The advantage of light actuation is clear: it would eliminate the need for pumps11 and complex electronic circuitry currently used for droplet transport12,13,14,15. Here, a brand new effect “photoelectrowetting on semiconductors” (PWOS) is demonstrated and explained by linking semiconductor physics16 and wetting phenomena17.
Over a hundred years after pioneering work on electro-capillarity phenomena18, electrowetting has undergone a recent renaissance via the use of microtechnology12,13,14,15. Briefly, when a droplet of conducting liquid, e.g. an electrolyte, is placed on a conductor coated with a thin layer of insulating material (Figure 1) the wetting contact angle θ of the droplet can be modified by applying a voltage V according to the Young-Lippmann equation17:
where θ 0 is the wetting contact angle at zero bias, C is the capacitance (per unit surface) of the insulating layer and γ is the surface tension of the liquid droplet. Note that C does not vary with either applied voltage or illumination for the liquid-insulator-conductor (LIC) system and the effect is symmetrical with voltage polarity, i.e. θ −V = θ +V. The effect has led to applications13 such as displays19,20, microelectromechanical systems21, tunable optics22 and digital-microfludics23,24 but still holds fundamental scientific challenges15.
In contrast, if we now replace the conductor in Figure 1 by a semiconductor to form a liquid-insulator-semiconductor (LIS) stack shown in Figure 2a, space-charge effects in the semiconductor can now modify the electrowetting behaviour as C can change with both applied voltage16and illumination25. The reason for this is that C is now composed of two capacitances connected in series: Ci , the insulator capacitance and Cs the voltage and illumination dependent capacitance of the space-charge region in the semiconductor (Figure 2b); an effect much exploited for image sensing26,27.
By borrowing well-known language from semiconductor physics16 we should be able to make some simple predictions about the electrowetting behaviour of the LIS system by making the analogy with the well-known metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) system. Indeed it is well known that depletion layers form at electrolyte-semiconductor interfaces28,29; this effect has been exploited for commercial purposes30,31 and electrolyte-semiconductor32 and electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor33 interfaces have been used for transistor-based sensing34,35 and carbon nanotube transistors36.
Straight away one can predict major differences compared to the LIC system: the electrowetting behaviour (i) will be asymmetrical with voltage polarity (θ −V θ +V) (ii) will depend on the doping density and type of the underlying semiconductor and (iii) will depend on illumination (the value of Cs , can be modified by incident above band gap radiation)16,25, (iv) under accumulation or high doping density should behave as the regular LIC system and (v) will be governed by other semiconductor effects, e.g. carrier inversion and breakdown16 at higher bias.
Figure 2c shows the predicted effect of illumination using above band gap light on a biased LIS system in depletion. Light penetrating into the semiconductor will generate electron-hole pairs in the depletion zone16; the effect of this is to increase the capacitance of the stack25 and thus reduce the contact angle of the droplet at constant applied voltage, i.e. the droplet spreads out upon illumination. Provided that there is no electrochemistry during illumination, e.g. due to breakdown of the insulator or the semiconductor, then the effect should be reversible.
The simple arguments above are based on the following assumptions: (i) the Debye length λ D in the electrolyte (see Supplementary Information) is much less than the thickness of the insulator and the depletion width in the semiconductor meaning electrical double layer (EDL) effects32,33 need not be considered, (ii) the capacitance is uniform under the droplet37 and (iii) interface effects are ignored for the moment (surface states, trapped charge, mobile ionic charge in the insulator, high field effects…)16.
Results
In order to test the above ideas commercial 3″ silicon wafers (Siltronix, France) were coated with an amorphous fluoropolymer layer of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). PTFE is commercially available as Teflon® AF (Dupont, USA). Fluoropolymer films are currently being investigated for transistor gate dielectric38,39. The Teflon® thicknesses were 265 nm (±15 nm) and 20 nm (±3 nm) using spin coating (see Supplementary Information). Near field microscopy (tapping mode Atomic Force Microscopy) revealed that the Teflon® films were very smooth (roughness Rq < 1 nm) and defect free (see Supplementary Information). Four types of silicon wafers were employed: p-type (NA ∼ 1.8×1015 cm−3 and NA ∼ 8×1018 cm−3) and n-type (ND ∼ 6×1014 cm−3 and ND ∼ 3.5×1017 cm−3) (see Supplementary Information); these will be referred to as p+, p, n+ and n henceforth. The silicon wafers were cleaned and deoxidised using H2SO4/H2O2 and HF based solutions in a controlled cleanroon environment (see Supplementary Information). Silicon wafers are ideal for the deposition of such thin films as their roughness is of the order of 1 nm. Aluminium Ohmic contacts were formed on the rear surface of the wafers to ensure a good electrical contact for the experiments (see Supplementary Information).
The contact angle data was gathered using a commercial Contact Angle Meter (GBX Scientific Instruments, France) (see Supplementary Information) and the experiments were performed in a class ISO 5/7 cleanroom (T = 20°C±0.5°C; RH = 45%±2%).
Five liquids were used for the experiments: (i) a dilute hydrochloric acid solution (concentration = 0.01 M) (ii) two saline solutions (0.01 M and 0.001 M) (iii) an acetic acid solution (1 M) and Coca-Cola® (The Coca-Cola Company, USA). The electrical conductivities of the solutions were measured to be 3.64 mS cm−1, 1.18 mS cm−1, 0.12 mS cm−1, 1.32 mS cm−1 and 1.07 mS cm−1 respectively (see Supplementary Information).
A small volume (∼µL) of liquid was placed on the Teflon® surface. One contact was provided using the Ohmic contact on the rear surface of the wafers. The voltage (±40 V) was applied to the liquid via a stainless steel wire inserted into the droplet and the contact angle was recorded (photographed and filmed) (see Supplementary Information). The applied voltage was stepped to the measurement voltage V (see Supplementary Information).
Figure 3 shows photographs of the droplet profile as a function of applied voltage for the different silicon wafers under ambient room lighting (<10 W m−2). For the two higher doped silicon wafers (p+ and n+) the contact angle measurements did not reveal a marked asymmetric contact angle variation with voltage polarity (Figure 3a and Figure 3b) behaving very much as the LIC system i.e. θ −V∼θ +V . In contrast, in the case of the two lower doped silicon wafers (p and n) a distinct electrowetting asymmetry, depending on the voltage polarity, is observed (Figure 3c and Figure 3d). If we consider the p-type sample, a negative voltage leads to a contact angle variation similar to the p+ sample (Figure 3c). However, for a positive voltage the contact angle variation is less, i.e. the droplet tends not to spread out for positive applied voltages. The opposite is observed for the n-type silicon in terms of voltage polarity (Figure 3d), i.e. the droplet tends not to spread out for negative applied voltages.
Interestingly asymmetrical electrowetting40 was reported for a silicon wafer (doping type and density not given in the paper) covered with a thin layer (100 nm) of Teflon® although this was attributed at the time to preferential adsorption of hydroxide ion, OH− at Teflon® AF-water interfaces. The results here involving the highly doped silicon wafers (p+ and n+) point towards a semiconductor related effect, as is reported here, rather than a Teflon®-liquid interaction.
Figure 4 shows the effect of illumination on the droplet profile for the different silicon wafers and liquids. Under depletion conditions, i.e. a negative voltage for n-type and a positive voltage for p-type, illumination with an above band gap white light source (Schott, USA) (see Supplementary Information) leads to the expected flattening out of the droplet at constant voltage, i.e. the predicted photoelectrowetting effect. The photoelectrowetting effect is reversible, switching off the light source causes the droplet to “pop-up” and the dark contact angle is restored; the process can be repeated many times. As the voltage is increased on the droplet (positive for p-type, negative for n-type) the droplet flattens out more upon illumination, i.e. the illuminated contact angle (θ Light) decreases with increasing voltage.
Figure 5 shows plots of the droplet contact angle as a function of applied voltage and illumination for the different silicon wafers. The two highly doped silicon wafers (p+ and n+) follow a classic relationship as expected from the Young-Lippmann equation (dashed black line) with C near constant. Figure 5 also shows the variation of droplet contact angle with illumination for the two lower doped silicon wafers (n and p). In contrast, the electrowetting for the lower doped p- and n-type silicon wafers does not at all follow a classic relationship for a positive and negative applied voltage respectively. In the case of the n-type wafer coated with 265 nm of Teflon® the contact angle at −30 V reduces by ∼7° whereas at +30 V it reduces by ∼20°. For the p-type wafer coated with 265 nm of Teflon®, the contact angle at −30 V reduces by ∼26° whereas at +30 V it reduces by ∼14°. The continuous coloured curves are based on results obtained during the electrical characterization (see later).
The largest optically induced contact angle change Δθ L = θ Dark − θ Light equal to ∼16° is observed for the n-type silicon at −40 V (Figure 5b) although by reducing the thickness of the Teflon® from 265 nm to 20 nm on the n-type wafer a Δθ L ∼15° can be achieved at voltages around 10 V (Figure 5c). The green arrows indicate reversibility.
The films (see Supplementary Information) enable a comparison of the time it takes the contact angle to adjust from θ Dark to θ Light and from θ 0 to θ ±V in the absence of illumination. These times were found to be comparable (∼70 ms) supporting the view that the effect of light is to switch from a depleted state to an illuminated state16,25 in the semiconductor via the generation of electron-hole pairs in the space-charge region. Additional experiments were preformed using bare silicon wafers not coated with Teflon® where a Schottky barrier is known to form28,29; a non-reversible photoelectrowetting effect was observed at low voltages (see Supplementary Information).
All this is well and good but in order to provide evidence that the photoelectrowetting and asymmetrical electrowetting effects observed here are related to space-charge effects in the semiconductor we need to look into what is happening underneath the surface. This can be done using impedance measurements.
Gold contacts (surface area ∼ 0.1–1 mm2) were evaporated onto the Teflon®-silicon samples through a mechanical mask to form MIS structures. Impedance measurements were gathered using a Precision Impedance Analyzer (Agilent, USA) (see Supplementary Information).
Figure 6 shows the capacitance-voltage curves for the gold-Teflon®-silicon stacks. For the highest doped (p+) silicon wafer (black squares) the capacitance is constant [6.43×10−5 F m−2 (±0.004×10−5 F m−2)] over the voltage range (±20 V) (Figure 6a). The low frequency dielectric constant of the Teflon® can be extracted from this to be 1.92 (±0.04). For the next highest doped wafer (n+) (black circles), a slight carrier accumulation/depletion effect is observed with the capacitance varying from 6.26×10−5 F m−2 to 6.4×10−5 F m−2 as the voltage is increased from −20 V to +20 V (Figure 6a). Illumination using the white light source was observed to have little effect on the capacitance of these two samples just as illumination had no noticeable effect on the contact angle during the photoelectrowetting experiments for these samples (p+ and n+).
In terms of the lower doped samples (p and n), Figure 6b and Figure 6c show the variation of capacitance with voltage under background room lighting <10 W m−2 (black squares). In this case the capacitance is observed to vary strongly with voltage as the depletion width in the semiconductor is modified. The stacks behave similar to MIS system. For the n-type wafer coated with 265 nm of Teflon® the capacitance is reduced from 6.14×10−5 F m−2 to 1.2×10−5 F m−2 as the applied voltage is reduced from 0 V to −40 V. In the case of the p-type wafer coated with 265 nm of Teflon® the capacitance reduces to 3.1×10−5 F m−2 from 6×10−5 F m−2 as the voltage is increased from −10 V to +40 V.
Figure 6b and Figure 6c show the effect of illumination on the capacitance-voltage curves of the lower doped silicon wafers using above band gap light using the same white light source (Schott, USA) as used for the electrowetting experiments. As expected, the effect of illumination is to increase of the capacitance of the stacks25. It is this increase in capacitance that causes the droplet to spread out in the electrowetting experiments upon illumination. Indeed, the measured capacitance-voltage curves (dark and light) can now be inserted into the Young-Lippmann equation in order to compare the electrical characterization with the electrowetting characterization; these are the continuous coloured curves visible on Figure 5. The capacitance-voltage variations for the highly doped wafers (blue curves in Figure 5) follow the Young-Lippmann equation with C near constant. The capacitance-voltage variations for the lower doped wafers (red curves in Figure 5) do not follow the Young-Lippmann equation (with C constant) as C now varies with V. The capacitance variation observed during the impedance measurements under illumination fits very well with the contact angle variation upon illumination during the photoelectrowetting experiments (pink curves in Figure 5). It is very clear that the electrical characterization gives very strong evidence that the asymmetrical electrowetting and photoelectrowetting observations here are semiconductor space-charge related effects16.
It was observed that the light intensity (or more correctly the irradiance W m−2) required to vary the capacitance (during the impedance measurements) was greater than was necessary to produce the equivalent photoelectrowetting response by a factor of ∼2–3. In order to understand why this is so the optical transmission into the silicon for the air-water-Teflon®-silicon and air-gold-Teflon®-silicon stacks was calculated (see Supplementary Information). The generation rate g cm−3 s−1 of photogenerated carriers in the silicon could thus be estimated and compared to an established photocapacitance model for MIS capacitors25. This calculation was in good agreement with observations and showed that (i) gphotoelectrowetting/gimpedance ∼3 for the same irradiance and (ii) gphotoelectrowetting >1020 cm−3 s−1 to produce the observed angle changes in the photoelectrowetting experiments. The photocapacitance model25 yields a value of this order (see Supplementary Information). Going further, the MIS photocapacitance model25 can be injected into the Young-Lippmann equation to calculate the variation of contact angle as a function of electron-hole pair generation rate g in the silicon (see Supplementary Information). The results of this are given in the following table and compare well with the experimental photoelectrowetting results given in Figure 4.
Discussion
In terms of optically induced liquid transport (thermal effects11 aside), the literature is relatively scarce41,42,43,44,45,46. Laser-induced microflow due to vortices is possible41,42 and an optically activated electrowetting has been reported43. However, this was due to a photoconductor used as a lumped circuit element rather than an intrinsic space-charge layer related effect which can be associated with the capacitance in the Young-Lippmann equation as is reported here. A “photo wetting” effect has also been reported using liquid crystals44 but the physical mechanism responsible for the observations is not yet clear. Droplet transport has been achieved using light-induced chemical modification of a surface45,46.
Another important point is that whereas droplet transport via electrowetting-on-dielectric23,24 (EWOD) relies on complex electronic circuitry to apply a voltage locally to achieve contact angle modification. Here, in principle, droplet transport using a photoelectrowetting-on-semiconductors (PWOS) effect would render this circuitry, along with the necessary microtechnology to achieve it, redundant. Thus decreasing the complexity and costs. Therefore, in principle, a laboratory-on-a-chip4 using PWOS for droplet transport would imply that the only micropatterning necessary would be for surface functionalization8.
We are now in a position to understand the electrowetting and photoelectrowetting on semiconductors in terms of energy bands. Figure 7 illustrates the role of the carriers in the semiconductor in electrowetting and photoelectrowetting on a semiconductor coated with an insulator. If we take the example of an underlying p-; for a negative applied voltage then accumulation of carriers (holes) can occur near the insulator/semiconductor interface (Figure 7a)16; in this case the electrowetting behaviour will behave as the LIC system (C = Ci) and the droplet will spread out. If now we apply a positive voltage to the droplet, depletion of carriers (holes) will occur near the insulator/semiconductor interface and Cs will diminish with increasing voltage16 resulting in less spreading out of the droplet (Figure 7b) as would occur at the equivalent negative voltage. If the positive bias is further increased then depending on doping level of the semiconductor carrier inversion (electrons) could occur16 at the insulator/semiconductor interface leading to a re-emergence electrowetting as in the LIC system (Figure 7c). Under depletion, illumination using above band gap light generates electron-hole pairs in the space-charge region leading to an increase of the overall capacitance (Figure 7d) and spreading out of the droplet, i.e. photoelectrowetting.
As a last point, it is important to understand that the effects described here are not the result of simply adding a lumped element into the circuit43 which acts as an optically controlled switch. On the contrary, the depletion layer in the underlying semiconductor is intrinsically responsible for the electrowetting and photoelectrowetting behaviour via the Young-Lippmann equation. Thus, the electrowetting and photoelectrowetting here is governed by the bulk electronic properties of the underlying semiconductor which allows the wetting to be controlled in a continuous way. The observations indicate a previously uncharted overlap between capillary phenomena and semiconductor physics which may prove to be valuable for the introduction of semiconductor effects into the above mentioned technologies8,9,10,11 where wetting and capillary effects are fundamental.
Methods
Materials
The silicon wafers were purchased from Siltronix, France. Data concerning the silicon wafers can be found in the on-line Supplementary Information. The Teflon® AF 1600 was purchased from DuPont™, USA. The processing details of the Teflon® films can be found in the on-line Supplementary Information.
Experiments
Detailed information concerning all the photoelectrowetting, impedance and atomic force microscopy measurements can be found in the on-line Supplementary Information.
Additional experiments
All additional experiments and information on the movies taken during the experiments can be found in the on-line Supplementary Information.
References
Stone, H. A., Stroock, A. D. & Ajdari, A. Engineering flows in small devices. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, 381–411 (2004).
Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442, 368–373 (2006).
Psaltis, D., Quake, S. R. & Yang, C. Developing optofluidic technology through the fusion of microfluidics and optics. Nature 442, 381–386 (2006).
Craighead, H. Future lab-on-a-chip technologies for interrogating individual molecules. Nature 442, 387–393 (2006).
Monat, C., Domachuk, P. & Eggleton, B. J. Integrated optofluidics: A new river of light. Nature Photonics, 1, 106–114 (2007).
Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F. & Zengerle, R. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev., 39, 1153–1182 (2010).
Arora, A., Simone, G., Salieb-Beugelaar, G. B., Kim, J. T. & Manz, A. Latest Developments in Micro Total Analysis Systems. Anal. Chem., 82, 4830–4847 (2010).
Ghallab, Y. H. & Badawy, W. Lab on a chip Techniques, Circuits and Biomedical Applications. (Artech House USA, 2010).
Ducrée, J. J. & Zengerle, R. Microfluidics (Microtechnology and MEMS) (Springer USA, 2011).
Fainman, Y., Lee, L., Psaltis, D. & Yang, C. Optofluidics: fundamentals, devices and applications (McGraw Hill USA, 2009).
Iverson, B. D. & Garimella, S. V. Recent advances in microscale pumping technologies: a review and evaluation. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 5, 145–174 (2008).
Mugele, F. & Baret, J.-C. Electrowetting: from basics to applications. J. Phys. Condensed Matter. 17, R705–R774 (2005).
Wheeler, A. R. Putting Electrowetting to Work. Science 322, 539–540 (2008).
Abdelgawad, M. & Wheeler, A. R. The Digital Revolution: A New Paradigm for Microfluidics. Adv. Mater. 21, 920–925 (2009).
Mugele, F. Fundamental challenges in electrowetting: from equilibrium shapes to contact angle saturation and drop dynamics. Soft Matter 5, 3377–3384 (2009).
Sze, S. M. Physics of semiconductor devices 3rd Edition (Wiley, 2007).
de Gennes, P. G., Brochard-Wyart, F. & Quéré, D. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena (Springer, 2004).
Lippmann G. Relations entre les phénomènes électriques et capillaires. Ann. Chim. Phys. 5, 494 (1875).
Beni, G. & Hackwood, S. Electro-wetting displays. Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 207–209 (1981).
Hayes, R. A. & Feenstra, B. J. Video-speed electronic paper based on electrowetting. Nature 425, 383–385 (2003).
Lee, J. & Kim, C.-J. Surface-Tension-Driven Microactuation Based on continuous electrowetting. J. MEMS. 9, 171–180 (2000).
Berge, B. & Peseux, J. Variable focal lens controlled by an external voltage: An application of electrowetting. Eur. Phys. J. E 3, 159–163 (2000).
Pollack, M. G., Fair, R. B. & Shenderov, A. D. Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1725–1726 (2000).
Cho, S. K., Moon, H. & Kim, C.-J. Creating, transporting, cutting and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. IEEE J. Micromech. Sys. 12, 70–80 (2003).
Grosvalet, J. & Jund, C. Influence of illumination on MIS capacitance in the strong inversion region. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 14, 777–780 (1967).
Boyle, W. S. & Smith, G. E. Charge Coupled Semiconductor Devices. Bell Sys. Tech. J. 49, 587–593 (1970).
Fossum, E. R. CMOS Image Sensors: Electronic Camera-On-A-Chip. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 44, 1689–1698 (1997).
Ambridge, T., Elliott, C. R. & Ambridge, T., Elliott, C. R. & Faktor, M. M. The electrochemical characterization of n-type gallium arsenide. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 3, 1–15 (1973).
Sharpe, C. D., Lilley, P., Elliott, C. R. & Ambridge, T. Electrochemical Carrier Concentration Profiling in Silicon. Electronics Letters. 15, 622–624 (1979).
Blood, P. Capacitance-voltage profiling and the characterisation of III-V semiconductors using electrolyte barriers. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1, 7–27 (1986).
Bak, T., Nowotny, J., Rekas, M., Sorrell, C. C. Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation from water using solar energy. Materials-related aspects. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 27, 991–1022 (2002).
Arutyunyan, V. M. Physical properties of the semiconductor-electrolyte interface. Sov. Phys. Usp. 3, 521–542 (1989).
Fung, C. D., Cheung, P. W. & Fung, C. D., Cheung, P. W. & Ko, W. H. A Generalized Theory of an Electrolyte-Insulator-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 33, 8–18 (1986).
Shinwari, M. W., Deen, M. J. & Landheer D. Study of the electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor field-effect transistor (EISFET) with applications in biosensor design. Microelectronics Reliability 47, 2025–2057 (2007).
Prodromakis, T., Liu, Y., Constandinou, T., Georgiou, P. & C. Toumazou Exploiting CMOS Technology to Enhance the Performance of ISFET Sensors. IEEE Electron Device Letters 31, 1053–1055 (2010).
Rosenblatt, S., Yaish, Y., Park, J., Gore, J., Sazonova, V. & McEuen, P. L. High Performance Electrolyte Gated Carbon Nanotube Transistors. Nano Lett. 2, 869–872 (2002).
Verheijen, H. J. J. & Prins, M. W. J. Contact angle and wetting velocity measured electrically. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 3668–3673 (1999).
Uno, M., Tominari, Y., & Takeya, J. Fabrication of high-mobility organic single-crystal field-effect transistors with amorphous fluoropolymer gate insulators. Organic Electronics 9, 753–756 (2008).
Shin, W. C., Shin, W. C., Seo, S., & Shin, W. C., Seo, S., & Cho, B. J. Highly air-stable electrical performance of graphene field effect transistors by interface engineering with amorphous fluoropolymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 153505–3 (2011).
Moon, H., Moon, H., Cho, S. K., Moon, H., Cho, S. K., Garrell, R. L. & Kim C.-J. Low voltage electrowetting-on-dielectric. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 4080–4087 (2002).
Nakano, M., Katsura, S., Touchard, G. G., Takashima, K. & Mizuno, A. Development of an optoelectrostatic micropump using a focused laser beam in a high-frequency electric field. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 43, 232–237 (2007).
Kumar, A., Williams, S. J. & Wereley, S. T. Experiments on opto-electrically generated microfluidic vortices. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 6, 637–646 (2009).
Chiou, P. Y., Moon, H., Toshiyoshi, H., Kim, C. J., Wu, M. C. Light actuation of liquid by optoelectrowetting. Sensors and Actuators A 104 222–228 (2003).
Goubert, G. & Galstian, T. Observation of a photo wetting effect on anisotropic liquid-solid interfaces. Optics Express 17, 9637–47 (2009).
Ichimura, K., Oh, S.-K. & Ichimura, K., Oh, S.-K. & Nakagawa, M. Light-Driven Motion of Liquids on a Photoresponsive Surface. Science 288, 1624–1626 (2000).
Berná, J., Leigh, D. A., Lubomska, M., Mendoza, S. M., Pérez, E. M., Rudolf, P., Teobaldi, G. &. Zerbetto, F. Macroscopic transport by synthetic molecular machines. Nature Mat. 4, 704–710 (2005).
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Gérard Cambien for technical help with the liquid resistivity measurements, Etienne Okada for technical help with impedance measurements and Dominique Deresmes for technical help with the AFM measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Arscott, S. Moving liquids with light: Photoelectrowetting on semiconductors. Sci Rep 1, 184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00184
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00184
This article is cited by
-
Passivation of miniature microwave coplanar waveguides using a thin film fluoropolymer electret
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
LED-based opto-wetting and fluidic transport for droplet mixing
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics (2019)
-
Visible light guided manipulation of liquid wettability on photoresponsive surfaces
Nature Communications (2017)
-
Robust bidirectional continuous electrowetting based on metal–semiconductor (M–S) diodes
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.