Introduction

Today, with the progress of human civilization and population growth, we are facing a severe water shortage and reduction of water quality due to various pollutions1,2. Wastewaters treatments are very expensive, and traditional methods in addition to imposing heavy costs do not meet the relevant standards in many cases. Recently, with the introduction of new technologies, new solutions such as novel photocatalysts, membranes, and environmentally friendly adsorbents have been introduced for wastewater treatments3,4,5,6. Photocatalysts are an important class of nanomaterials used in the purification of heavily polluted water and are very effective when other purification methods are not useful or economical7,8,9,10.

Among the wide range of metal-containing photocatalysts7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, the tungstates with the general formula of A2WOx (AWOs) are considered to be the promising candidates with great photocatalytic potentials due to the unique electronic structure, wide band gap, good chemical stability, and physicochemical properties18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. However, the high recombination rate of photogenerated electron–hole pairs reduces the potential of these catalysts to remove the high concentration pollutants18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. To overcome this limitation, these photocatalysts combined with other materials to reduce the recombination rate. Graphene and its derivations are wildly used as metal-free co-catalysts to enhance photocatalytic performance by promoting charge transfer and reducing the rate of electron–hole recombination24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31.

Also, interface engineering such as the fabrication of heterojunctions is an effective solution to improve the photogenerated charge separation in photocatalysts. In addition to 2D metal-containing semiconductors such as MXenes32, metal-free semiconductors such as g-C3N4 and g-SiC are also considered to be the most promising material for the construction of composite heterojunctions7,33,34,35,36,37,38,39.

Siligraphenes (g-SiCs) are the class of graphenic materials in which a large number of carbon atoms have been replaced by silicon40,41,42. The g-SiC has high thermal, mechanical, and chemical stability along with high surface area, low band gap, and high electron mobility which made it a superior catalyst for removing different organic pollutants at high concentrations42,43,44,45,46,47. The 2D layered structure of siligraphene made it superior candidate to form the well-defined composite heterojunctions. Siligraphene can prevent the aggregation of composites as well as improve the separation of photogenerated electron − hole pairs due to the superior electron mobility of siligraphene. Also, the doping of Si atoms in this structure gives extraordinary properties to this compound compared to graphene, which can make this material a very good candidate for making improved catalysts with graphenic structures. So far none has reported the potential of siligraphene coupled with tungstates (AWOs) for removal of organic pollutants in water.

In this work, the new Z-scheme heterojunctions of Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 with siligraphene (g-SiC) were synthesized for removal of high concentration of tetracycline under visible light. Siligraphene (g-SiC) was synthesized via a low-temperature method to maintain the porous structure and g-SiC/AWO composites were developed by immobilizing of tungstates on the surface of g-SiC. Siligraphene can decrease the band gap, increase the charge transfer, and decrease the rate of photogenerated electron–hole recombination.

Result and discussion

Characterization of g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4

Figure 1 shows the FT-IR spectra of g-SiC catalysts. FT-IR spectra of g-SiC shows the Si–C stretching vibration at 813 cm-1 which confirms the formation of a bond between silicon and carbon. The g-SiC/Ag2WO4 spectra shows the stretching vibration of the Si–C bond at 785 cm-1 which is shifted to a lower frequency compared to g-SiC (813 cm-1), indicating the stronger Si–C bond. The stretching vibrations of the W–O bond appeared at 823 cm-1 and the bands at 570–650 cm-1 are related to W–O–W and O–W–O asymmetric stretching vibrations of the WO42- anion48.

Figure 1
figure 1

FT-IR spectra of g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4.

The Si–C stretching vibration was observed at 816 cm-1 in g-SiC/Bi2WO6 catalyst which is slightly shifted to a higher frequency compared to g-SiC which indicates the immobilization of Bi2WO6 on the surface of g-SiC. The absorption bands that appeared at 582 and 470 cm-1 are related to Bi–O vibrations, and the absorption bands in the region of 729 cm-1 is corresponds to W–O vibration49.

The absorption band of Si–C appeared at 837 cm-1 in g-SiC/Na2WO4 catalyst. The W–O vibration of WO4–2 anion is observed in the 810 cm-1 and the band at 472 cm-1 is related to W–O–W vibration50.

Figure 2 shows the XRD diffraction pattern of g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 compared to g-SiC. The Ag2WO4 diffraction peaks were observed at 2Ɵ of 16.65, 29.95, 30.95, 33.15, 44.55, 46.15, 53.7, 55.6, 56.75, 65.01, and 77.9° in g-SiC/Ag2WO4 which represent the mixture of α and β phases of Ag2WO4 (JCPDS #34-0061; orthorhombic α- Ag2WO4) and (JCPDS #33-1195; hexagonal β- Ag2WO4)19,48.

Figure 2
figure 2

XRD diffraction patterns of g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4.

In the g-SiC/Bi2WO6 sample, the diffraction peaks observed at 2Ɵ of 28.35, 32.95, 47.20, 56.16, 58.77, 76.06, and 78.61° indicate the (131), (200), (202), (310), (226), (113), and (139) planes of the orthorhombic structure of Bi2WO6 (JCPDS #39-0256)49.

Figure 2 shows that in g-SiC/Na2WO4 sample, the diffraction peaks of sodium tungstate were observed at 16.95, 27.75, 32.65, 43.40, 48.95, 52.05, 57.05, 59.95, 64.75, 67.45, 74.35, and 78.30° which indicate the (111), (220), (311), (331), (422), (511), (440), (620), (533), (444), and (642) planes (JCPDS# 12-772)51.

In all samples, the weak diffraction peaks of the hexagonal 6H-SiC structure were observed which indicates the covering of g-SiC surface with tungstate particles. 6H-SiC is a hexagonal polytype of SiC with stacking sequence repeats every six bilayers along the c-axis direction. The diffraction peaks of the g-SiC were observed at 31.61, 35.58, 37.98, 60.08, and 71.76 representing the (101), (102), (103), (110), and (202) planes in the hexagonal structure of g-SiC (JCPDS#-29-1128)42,43,44,45,46,47. The high amounts of immobilized tungstates (AWO) on the surface of g-SiC have led to the observation of weak diffractions from 6H-SiC in these composites.

The lattice fringe data were recorded in Table S1.

Figure 3 shows the SEM images of synthesized catalysts. As shown in Fig. 3, needle-like, nanoparticle, and plate-like morphologies of Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 were observed on the surface of g-SiC in g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 catalysts, respectively.

Figure 3
figure 3

SEM images of g-SiC/Ag2WO4 (a), g-SiC/Bi2WO6 (b), and g-SiC/Na2WO4 (c).

Figure 4a displays the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4, which shows the decrease of surface area after immobilization of AWO on the surface of g-SiC. These results can be justified by the filling of pores in g-SiC by AWO particles, which is shown in pore size distribution curves (Fig. 4b). In g-SiC/Na2WO4, different pore distribution and higher surface area was observed, indicating the formation of new porosity of surface due to the larger size of Na2WO4 particles (Fig. 4b and Fig. 3c).

Figure 4
figure 4

N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and pore size distribution curves of g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4.

Figure 5a illustrates the band gaps of synthesized catalysts based on UV–Vis drift reflectance spectra. As can be seen, the band gaps of g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 are calculated as 2.83, 2.80, and 2.88 eV, respectively (Fig. 5). Results show the decreases of band gap of tungstate compounds after stabilization on the surface of g-SiC. The band gap of Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 are reported 3.1, 2.89, and 3.7 eV, respectively26,50,52 which decrease after forming a heterojunction with g-SiC (band gap = 1.99 eV).

Figure 5
figure 5

Band gap (a), photoluminescence (PL) spectra (b), and Nyquist plots (EIS) (c) of g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4.

Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of synthesized samples were shown in Fig. 5b to evaluate the degree of charge recombination53. As shown in Fig. 5b, the PL intensities of g-SiC/AWO samples decrease significantly in comparison with the pure Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4, which indicates that the immobilization of tungstates on the g-SiC surface decrease the recombination rate of photogenerated electron-holes. In g-SiC/AWO samples, photogenerated electrons could be transferred efficiently from tungstates to g-SiC due to the high charge carrier of the g-SiC sheets.

The efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole separation of synthesized samples was further studied by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)54. As shown in Fig. 5c, the Nyquist plots of the g-SiC/AWO samples exhibit the smaller resistance than g-SiC, indicating the better separation efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers and therefore enhanced photocatalytic activities.

Photocatalytic results

The photocatalytic performance of g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 in comparison with Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 and their graphene composites (gr/AWO) were reported in Fig. 6. As can be seen, immobilization of tungstate catalysts on the surface of g-SiC enhances the photocatalytic degradation of TCL and 97, 98, and 94% removal of TCL (50 ppm) were observed for g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 after 20 min, respectively (Fig. 6). While, Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 show the weak photocatalytic performances in the removal of high concentrations tetracycline (50 ppm), and 16, 25, and 18% TCL removal were observed after 100 min (Fig. 6). These results show the good effect of g-SiC as catalyst support. Figure 6 also shows that g-SiC as a metal-free catalyst represents better photocatalytic activity than tungstate catalysts and can remove 80% of TCL in a shorter time (30 min). This shows that g-SiC does not only play the role of catalyst support and acts as a photocatalyst to create a heterojunction with tungstates, which can improve the catalytic performances of tungstate photocatalysts (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

Comparison of photocatalytic performances of AWO, gr/AWO, g-SiC, and g-SiC/AWO composites in removal of 50 ppm TCL.

To better understand the effect of g-SiC on the photocatalytic performance of g-SiC/AWO composites, the photocatalytic properties of immobilized Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 on the surface of graphene (gr/AWO) were also compared with g-SiC/AWO composites (Fig. 6). As we know, graphene along with other semiconductors like tungstates can improve the photocatalytic properties by increasing the transfer of electron and decreasing the rate of electron–hole recombination24,25,26,27,28. Therefore, better photocatalytic activities can be seen in gr/AWO composites than in tungstates alone (Fig. 6).

As seen in Fig. 6, replacing siligraphene (g-SiC) instead of graphene (gr) shows significant increases in photocatalytic properties. The g-SiC is a graphene structure in which half of its C atoms have been replaced by Si atoms. This graphene structure can increase the catalytic activity due to its high electron mobility. Besides charge transfer capability, also photogenerated charge lifetime contributes to the photocatalytic reaction. Interactions between g-SiC and Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, or Na2WO4 can reduce the rate of electron–hole recombination and improve photocatalytic performance. Also, π electrons in the siligraphene structure can form the π back-bonding with metal atoms and increase the electron–hole separation and enhance the photocatalytic activity55.

In addition to the advantages of graphene structure in g-SiC composites, the heterojunctions created with g-SiC reduce the band gap and can enhance the photocatalytic activity by shortening the electron transfer distance through the Z-scheme mechanism which will be explained later in this discussion.

Another mechanism that plays a role in enhancing the catalytic properties of g-SiC composites (g-SiC/AWO) is related to the surface charges in the g-SiC structure. According to our previous report, due to the electronegativity difference between Si and C in the g-SiC (siligraphene) structure, Si atoms have a partial positive charge and C atoms have a partial negative charge7,10,42. The dissolved O2 in a solution can adsorb on positive charged Si atoms in g-SiC, the O–O bonds dissociated and the oxygenated radicals were formed that can proceed the photocatalytic oxidation process7,10,42. As shown in Fig. 6, 64–85% TCL removal were observed at the time zero for g-SiC composites (g-SiC/AWO), indicating the degradation of TCL even at dark via oxidation of TCL by formed oxygenated radicals. While, in the graphene composites (gr/AWO), only 15–23% TCL removal was observed at dark due to the adsorption of TCL on the surface of graphene (Fig. 6).

As shown in Fig. 4, the BET results confirm the reduction of surface area in g-SiC/AWO composites. These data show that the increases in catalytic properties are related to the structural properties of immobilized tungstates on the surface of g-SiC, and the effect of the chemical structure was dominant over the effect of the surface area.

To achieve the best results, the reaction conditions were optimized in Fig. 7. Figure 7a–c represents the photocatalytic results in the removal of different concentrations of TCL. As can be seen, with the increase in TCL concentration, the removal has decreased. An increase in TCL concentration causes the saturation of the photocatalyst surface which decreases the photocatalytic activity.

Figure 7
figure 7

Photocatalytic removal of 20 ppm (a), 50 ppm (b), and 70 ppm (c) TCL in Visible light, different amounts of g-SiC/Bi2WO6 catalyst (d), effect of pH (e), and recovery of catalysts (f).

The effect of catalyst amounts was also investigated by using g-SiC/Bi2WO6 as the best photocatalyst (Fig. 7d). Results show that increasing the amounts of photocatalyst from 0.01 to 0.015 g increases the catalytic performance. Increasing the amount of catalyst to 0.02 g only increases the rate of degradation (Fig. 7d).

The effect of pH in photocatalytic removal of TCL by g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 catalysts were shown in Fig. 7e. As TCL has the several functional groups, different ionized species were formed at different pH. The H2TC+ species was observed at pH < 3.3, H2TC0 zwitterionic species was formed at pH 3.3–7.7, and HTC/TC2− species was produced at pH > 7.756,57. As known, the surface charge of the catalyst becomes positive at a pH lower than pHzpc, which can absorb the negative molecules. The pHzpc of g-SiC, g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 were measured 6.7, 5.9, 5.2, and 5.6, respectively. So, at pHzpc of catalysts (pH = 5–7), H2TC0 as the main species of TCL can be adsorbed on the surface of catalysts via interaction of negative tricarbonyl amide groups of TCL with a positive charge of Si atoms on the g-SiC structure10. At a pH lower than 3.3, the TCL removal decreases due to the repulsion between the H2TC+ species of TCL and the positive surface of catalysts. Also, at a pH higher than 7.7, the photocatalytic performances were decreased which is related to electrostatic repulsion between the negative surface of catalysts and HTC/TC2− species of TCL (Fig. 7e).

To check the stability of the catalysts, their recovery was also investigated. As can be seen in Fig. 7f, no change in the photocatalytic efficiency can be observed after 3 runs. In the next runs, a slight drop in the photocatalytic activity is seen, which is related to the saturation of the catalyst surfaces. The g-SiC catalyst has a lower photocatalytic ability, so a greater drop in recovery is observed. A lower drop in the activity of tungstate catalysts (g-SiC/AWO) indicates the high activity of these photocatalysts in the continuous recovery.

Figure 8 shows the proposed mechanism of photocatalytic degradation by g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 composites. Based on band structures, these semiconductors are excited under visible light irradiation and electrons and holes are created in the valence (VB) and conduction (CB) bonds. The CB and VB potentials of g-SiC/AWO catalysts were predicted by the following equation:

$${\text{E}}_{{{\text{VB}}}} = X - {\text{ E}}_{{\text{e}}} + \, 0.{\text{5 E}}_{{\text{g}}}$$
$${\text{E}}_{{{\text{CB}}}} = {\text{ E}}_{{{\text{VB}}}} - {\text{ E}}_{{\text{g}}}$$
Figure 8
figure 8

Z-Scheme mechanism of photocatalytic degradation by g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 composites.

X is the electronegativity of the semiconductor and Ee is the energy of free electrons in the hydrogen scale (approximately 4.5 eV). The X value of g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 are reported 6, 6.36, and 6.5 eV, respectively48,50,58. The Eg of Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 were measured from UV–Vis spectra 3.1, 2.89, and 3.7 eV, respectively (Fig. 5b). As a result, ECB and EVB for Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4 have been calculated as − 0.05 and 3.05 eV, 0.41 and 3.30 eV, and 0.15 and 3.85 eV, respectively. The Eg of g-SiC was obtained at 1.99 eV from UV–Vis spectra (Fig. 5b) and EVB was measured at 1.24 eV from XPS spectra (Fig. S1). As a result, the ECB of g-SiC has been calculated as − 0.72 eV. Based on energy levels of g-SiC and its tungstate catalysts, the CB of g-SiC (− 0.72 V) is more negative than O2/·O2 (− 0.33 V) and the VB of Ag2WO4 (3.05 V), Bi2WO6 (3.3 V), and Na2WO4 (3.85 V) are more positive than OH-/·OH (+ 1.99 V), so, the photogenerated e can reduce the O2 to form ·O2 radicals and photogenerated h+ can oxidize OH- to produce ·OH radicals. Results confirm the electrons in the CB of AWO combine directly with the holes in the VB of g-SiC, indicating the direct Z-scheme mechanism in the charge transfer path of photogenerated electron–hole in g-SiC/AWO heterojunctions.

Traditional BWO-based heterojunction is commonly performed via the Type-II strategy to accelerate the rate of charge transfer. These conventional heterojunction has a drawback that charge migration causes the photogenerated electron–hole to have weak redox ability59,60,61. In this novel Z-scheme heterojunction not only gives photocatalyst with superior redox ability, but also accelerates the migration of photogenerated electron-holes62. Figure 8 clearly shows that the heterojunctions created with g-SiC reduce the band gaps and can enhance the photocatalytic properties by shortening the electron transfer distance through the Z-scheme mechanism. The smaller band gap and shorter electron transfer path which enhances the stability of carrier transfer in Bi2WO6 is the reason for the better photocatalytic activity of this catalyst.

The quenching tests were also done to identify the active radicals involved in photocatalytic reaction for g-SiC/AWO catalysts (Fig. 9). The quenching results of g-SiC indicate the involvement of ·OH and ·O2 radicals as the main species in the degradation of TCL. While, in g-SiC/AWO photocatalysts, ·OH and h+ are the reactive species in the photocatalytic reaction, and ·O2 radical shows the lower involvement in the degradation of TCL (Fig. 9).

Figure 9
figure 9

Quenching experiments of photocatalytic removal of TCL (ppm 50).

In general, it can be concluded that by using the g-SiC as catalyst support, new Z-scheme heterojunctions of tungstates (g-SiC/AWO) can be developed to find out the visible light degradation of high concentration of antibiotics by improving the charge separation, enhancing the electron transfer in Z-scheme heterojunction, and decreasing the rate of photogenerated electron–hole recombination.

Methods

Materials and instruments

Perlite (SiO2: 98%, porosity: 85%) was used as natural precursor of Si source and citric acid as a C source were purchased from Merck. Ethanol (96%), Mg powder (0.3–0.06 μm), hydrochloric acid (37%), and hydrofluoric acid (40%) were obtained from Merck.

FT-IR spectra were obtained from Bruker, Vector instrument. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to study the morphology of samples by TESCAN, VEGA3 microscope armed with the X-ray energy dispersive spectroscope (EDX), and TEM microscopy was done using Zeiss, EM10C microscope. Crystalline phases were identified by BrukerAxs, D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (XRD) using CuKα radiation. Raman spectra were obtained with Bruker, Senterra Raman spectrometer with a 785 nm laser. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and the pore size distributions were recorded by Belsorp mini instrument. XPS analysis was recorded from ESCALAB 250Xi Thermo Scientific system (MgKα = 1253.6 eV).

Synthesis of g-SiC (siligraphene)

Citric acid was used as a carbon source and prepared by dissolving 0.8 g of citric acid in 100 mL of distilled water. Perlite powder was first washed with HCl (1 M) solution to remove its impurities and dried at 70 °C for 8 h. Then, 2 g of perlite was added to 200 mL of citric acid (8 g/L) solution and sonicated for 15 min. The powder filtered and dried at oven. To better penetration of citric acid to perlite pores, this process repeated 5 times. Finally, the mixture was dried at 80 °C for 24 h. The obtained powder was put in a furnace at 800 °C (5 °C /min) for 1 h under an N2 atmosphere to obtain the SiO2/carbon composite. To form the Si–C bond, the composite was mixed with Mg powder with the Si:Mg ratio of 1:2 and heated at 800 °C for 5.5 h under an N2 atmosphere (5 °C /min). To eliminate the impurity of MgO, the produced g-SiC was immersed in HCl solution (2 M) for 48 h and then washed with distilled water to remove MgCl2. The residual silica was removed by immersing the produced g-SiC in 2 M HF solution. Afterward, the g-SiC (siligraphene) was filtered and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h.

Synthesis of g-SiC/AWO (A=Ag, Bi, Na)

For stabilization of Ag2WO4 and Bi2WO6 on g-SiC (siligraphene), 0.2 g of synthesized g-SiC was sonicated for 10 min in a certain amount of distilled water. Silver or bismuth solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g of silver or bismuth nitrate in 25 mL of distilled water and stirring for 0.5 h. Then, Ag or Bi solution was added to g-SiC suspension and stirred for 0.5 h. Tungsten solution was also prepared by dissolving 0.1 g of sodium tungstate in 25 mL of distilled water for 0.5 h, then added dropwise to Ag/g-SiC or Bi/g-SiC mixture under sonication. The final mixtures were placed in an oven at 160 °C for 5 h. The solid powder was filtered and dried at 70 °C.

The g-SiC/Na2WO4 was also synthesized by adding 0.1 g of sodium tungstate to g-SiC suspension under sonication. The mixture was heated at 160 °C for 5 h. The solid product was filtered and dried at 70 °C.

Photocatalytic experiments

To investigate the photocatalytic performance, the removal of tetracycline (TCL) as a drug pollutant were evaluated. In a batch experiment, a certain amount of g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 photocatalysts was dispersed in 10 mL of tetracycline (TCL) solution under stirring. The solution saturates with oxygen by air bubbling into the system and irradiated by visible light. To optimize the photocatalytic reaction, different concentrations of TCL (20, 50, and 70 ppm) were tested by using 0.01, 0.015, and 2 g of catalyst at pH of 2–12. Before irradiation, all samples were stirred at dark for 5 min, and then the photocatalytic process was performed. The concentration of dye in the solution was measured by UV–Vis spectroscopy after each 20 min. After each 10 min, the concentration of TCL was measured by UV–Vis spectroscopy at 357 nm. The TCL removal percent was determined using the following equation:

$${\text{Removal \% }} = \left[ {\frac{{\left( {C_{0} - C_{t} } \right)}}{{C_{0} }}} \right]*100\%$$

where C0 and Ct are the initial and equilibrium TCL concentrations.

Quenching experiments were done by using 2 Mm of isopropanol (IPA) as hydroxyl radical (·OH) scavenger, 1,4-benzoquinone (BQ) as superoxide radical anions (·O2) scavenger, and ammonium oxalate (AO) as the scavenger of the hole (h+).

Conclusion

The new Z-scheme heterojunctions of siligraphene (g-SiC) with different tungstates (Ag2WO4, Bi2WO6, and Na2WO4) were synthesized and their photocatalytic properties were investigated in the removal of tetracycline. Based on the photocatalytic degradation results, the photocatalytic potentials of tungstates catalysts were promoted by immobilizing on the surface of g-SiC. The graphenic structure of g-SiC can improve photocatalytic performance by increasing the electron transfer and decreasing the rate of electron–hole recombination. Also, the π back-bonding of g-SiC with metal atoms increases the electron–hole separation to enhance the photocatalytic activity. Furthermore, the heterojunctions created with g-SiC reduce the band gap and can enhance the photocatalytic activity by shortening the electron transfer distance through the Z-scheme mechanism. The optimized g-SiC/AWO composites exhibited high photocatalytic performances and 97, 98, and 94% of high concentrations tetracycline (50 ppm) were removed after 20 min by using only 10 mg of g-SiC/Ag2WO4, g-SiC/Bi2WO6, and g-SiC/Na2WO4 catalysts, respectively. The g-SiC/Bi2WO6 photocatalyst shows the highest photocatalytic activity due to the smaller band gap and shorter electron transfer path.