Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Experimental modulation of physiological force application on leg joint neurons in intact Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract

The study of how mechanical forces affect biological events in living tissue is important for the understanding of a multitude of physiogical and pathophysiological phenomena. However, these investigations are often impeded by insufficient knowledge about force parameters, inadequate experimental administration of force stimuli and lack of noninvasive means to record their molecular and cellular effects. We therefore introduced a procedure to study the impact of force stimulation on adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor dissociation in mechanosensory neurons. Here, we detail a procedure to harness the mechanical force spectrum that emerges during the natural flexion-extension cycle of the femorotibial joint of adult fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster). Mechanical load generated during the joint’s motion is transmitted to specialized mechanosensory neurons residing close to the joint axis, which serve as proprioceptive sensors in the peripheral nervous system of the animal. Temporary immobilization of the joint by a restraint made of a human hair allows for the observation of transgenic mechanosensitive reporters by using fluorescent readout in the neurons before, during and after cessation of mechanical stimulation. The assay harnesses physiologically adequate stimuli for joint flexion and extension, can be conducted noninvasively in live specimens and is compatible with various transgenic reporter systems beyond the initially conceived strategy and mechanobiological hypotheses tested. The application of the protocol requires knowledge in Drosophila genetics, husbandry and fluorescence imaging and micromanipulation skills. The experimental procedure can be completed in 10 h and requires an additional 30 min in advance for fly fixation and leg immobilization. The apple agar cooking and heptane glue preparation requires a maximum of 30 min on the day before the experiment is conducted.

Key points

  • This protocol describes an assay to study molecular mechanosensation, in which mechanical forces cause stimulation of mechanosensitive target molecules in proprioceptive neurons. Transgenic reporters of force stimulation or neuronal activity can be coupled to binary expression systems such as the GAL4/upstream activating sequence (UAS), LexA/lexAop and QF/Q upstream activating sequence (QUAS).

  • The approach provides a noninvasive and imaging-based approach to manipulating joint motion (i.e., mechanical force generation) and measuring the molecular effects caused by this motion in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: General workflow of the fly and leg immobilization/re-mobilization procedure.
Fig. 2: Detailed workflow of the leg immobilization procedure.
Fig. 3: Preparation of heptane glue mixture and TransTimer intensity analysis for quantification of mechanosensitive reporter responses.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data for Figs. 1–3 are available in Figshare with the identifier https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24024480 (ref. 24).

References

  1. Hoffman, B. D., Grashoff, C. & Schwartz, M. A. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature 475, 316–323 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hudspeth, A. J. Integrating the active process of hair cells with cochlear function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 600–614 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ranade, S. S., Syeda, R. & Patapoutian, A. Mechanically activated ion channels. Neuron 87, 1162–1179 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Langenhan, T., Piao, X. & Monk, K. R. Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors in nervous system development and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 550–561 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scholz, N., Monk, K. R., Kittel, R. J. & Langenhan, T. Adhesion GPCRs as a putative class of metabotropic mechanosensors. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 234, 221–247 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfenson, H., Yang, B. & Sheetz, M. P. Steps in mechanotransduction pathways that control cell morphology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 81, 1–21 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mammoto, A., Mammoto, T. & Ingber, D. E. Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3061–3073 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scholz, N. et al. Molecular sensing of mechano- and ligand-dependent adhesion GPCR dissociation. Nature 615, 945–953 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scholz, N. et al. The adhesion GPCR Latrophilin/CIRL shapes mechanosensation. Cell Rep. 11, 866–874 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dannhäuser, S. et al. Antinociceptive modulation by the adhesion GPCR CIRL promotes mechanosensory signal discrimination. Elife 9, e56738 (2020).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholz, N. et al. Mechano-dependent signaling by Latrophilin/CIRL quenches cAMP in proprioceptive neurons. Elife 6, e28360 (2017).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Desai, B. S., Chadha, A. & Cook, B. The stum gene is essential for mechanical sensing in proprioceptive neurons. Science 343, 1256–1259 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. He, L., Binari, R., Huang, J., Falo-Sanjuan, J. & Perrimon, N. In vivo study of gene expression with an enhanced dual-color fluorescent transcriptional timer. Elife 8, e46181 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simpson, J. H. & Looger, L. L. Functional imaging and optogenetics in Drosophila. Genetics 208, 1291–1309 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, L., Callaway, E. M. & Svoboda, K. Genetic dissection of neural circuits: a decade of progress. Neuron 98, 256–281 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bos, J. L. Epac: a new cAMP target and new avenues in cAMP research. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 733–738 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robichaux, W. G. & Cheng, X. Intracellular cAMP sensor EPAC: physiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutics development. Physiol. Rev. 98, 919–1053 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, H. H. & St-Pierre, F. Genetically encoded voltage indicators: opportunities and challenges. J. Neurosci. 36, 9977–9989 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bando, Y., Sakamoto, M., Kim, S., Ayzenshtat, I. & Yuste, R. Comparative evaluation of genetically encoded voltage indicators. Cell Rep. 26, 802–813.e4 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fosque, B. F. et al. Labeling of active neural circuits in vivo with designed calcium integrators. Science 347, 755–760 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grashoff, C. et al. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 466, 263–266 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krieg, M., Dunn, A. R. & Goodman, M. B. Mechanical control of the sense of touch by β-spectrin. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 224–233 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmied, C. & Tomancak, P. Sample reparation and mounting of Drosophila embryos for multiview light sheet microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 1478, 189–202 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buhlan, M., Ljaschenko, D., Scholz, N. & Langenhan, T. Figshare Raw Image Data. Available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24024480

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to N.S. and T.L. through FOR2149, project numbers 265903901 (project P01) and 265996823 (project P03) and through CRC 1423, project number 421152132 (projects A06 and B06), and by a junior research grant from the Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University to N.S. M.B. is funded by the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes. Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) were used in this study. The authors thank the Tomancak group at the MPI-CBG Dresden for suggestions regarding fly immobilization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.B. designed, conducted and analyzed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. D.L. initiated and analyzed the experiments. N.S. initiated and designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. T.L. initiated, designed and analyzed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicole Scholz or Tobias Langenhan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Dimitris Placantonakis and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Scholz, N. et al. Nature 615, 945–953 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05802-5

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buhlan, M., Ljaschenko, D., Scholz, N. et al. Experimental modulation of physiological force application on leg joint neurons in intact Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Protoc 19, 113–126 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00907-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00907-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing