This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 

Dealing With the Hazards of Harnessing Sunlight

By: Barbara Demmig-Adams  (Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Colorado, Boulder, CO), Christopher M. Cohu (Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Colorado, Boulder, CO) & William W. Adams III (Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Colorado, Boulder, CO) © 2012 Nature Education 
Citation: Demmig-Adams, B., Cohu, C. M. & Adams III, W. W. (2012) Dealing With the Hazards of Harnessing Sunlight. Nature Education Knowledge 4(1):18
Email
The collection of sunlight for food/fuel can be hazardous for plants (and algae). Plants use powerful photo-protective defense mechanisms to meet the challenges of different environments.
Aa Aa Aa

 

Demmig-adams banner

Sunlight is the ultimate energy source for virtually all life on Earth. This energy is harnessed by primary producers, organisms capable of using solar energy in photosynthesis, to create energy-rich sugars and sugar-derived molecules as the basis of the Earth's supply of food, fuels, and materials like wood and cotton. Photosynthetic organisms are also the source of all free oxygen, a molecule essential to almost all life. Primary producers come in all forms and sizes, from photosynthetic microbes to giant algae and plants, and populate both oceans and land.

Harnessing solar energy, however, is hazardous, and presents a formidable challenge to photosynthetic organisms. In fact, un-utilized light energy (any energy not converted to stable products like sugars) has the potential to destroy the light-collecting system itself. Moreover, such un-utilized energy can also destroy other major cell components and swiftly kill the whole cell. How? In photosynthesis, a light-absorbing pigment (typically chlorophyll) becomes energized after absorbing a photon of light (Figure 1). This energized state is what ultimately supplies the energy for the synthesis of energy-rich sugars. However, when more light is absorbed than can be utilized for sugar production, the (un-utilized, or excess) excitation energy can instead be passed off to oxygen. The resulting highly reactive oxygen has the potential to destroy the photosynthetic system and lead to cell death. Photosynthesis as we know it could therefore not exist (in an oxygen-containing atmosphere) without powerful photo-protective mechanisms, protecting against potential damage by un-utilized light energy.

Scheme of photoprotection mechanisms.
Figure 1: Scheme of photoprotection mechanisms.
Photoprotection occurs via several different mechanisms, often acting in concert with one another: Avoidance, Photorespiration, Dissipation, and Anti-oxidation. Light energy can be physically avoided by cutting down on light absorption. Absorption of light boosts chlorophyll (Chl) to an excited state (1Chl*). This excitation energy is utilized to create sugars by means of photosynthesis (or fuels the “futile” metabolic pathway of photorespiration). Excitation energy in excess of what can be utilized in metabolism is harmlessly removed by de-excitation of 1Chl* (dissipation; see Figure 6) and/or de-excitation of reactive forms of oxygen (anti-oxidation; see Figure 7).
© 2012 Nature Education All rights reserved. View Terms of Use

Alternative Utilization of Absorbed Light Energy

Even when the plant is not actively growing or storing products of photosynthesis, routes exist for the "utilization" of absorbed light energy through energy-consuming biochemical pathways that do not lead to sugar production. These paths are "futile" in that they do not generate energy-rich molecules for metabolism and growth, but they do fulfill a useful function in that they provide a pathway to get rid of potentially destructive excess excitation energy under mild stress. Under harsher conditions, different photo-protective mechanisms (see below), not based on biochemical reactions that may be inhibited by severe stress, are needed.

Cutting Down on Light Absorption

An obvious option for avoiding damage by excess light is to decrease the actual absorption of sunlight. This can be accomplished by a wide variety of approaches. In plants, light absorption can be lowered at the leaf level, either by growth of the leaf at a steep angle (Figure 2b) or by rapid leaf movements displayed by certain plant species. The latter movements expose the leaf to the sun when light energy can be fully utilized in photosynthesis, and turn the leaf away from the sun when light absorption exceeds light utilization. Chlorophyll-containing structures (chloroplasts) can also be spread out along the tops of cells to increase light absorption, or instead be pressed against the sides of cells to minimize absorption when there is too much light (Figure 2c). Another option is to reflect sunlight striking the leaf by virtue of light-reflecting leaf hairs, wax, or even a layer of white salt. Moreover, at the level of molecules, the plant can synthesize more or less of the photosynthetic pigments themselves as well as of the proteins that bind and display these (Figure 3). An extension of this conceptual approach is employed by long-lived plants that drop their leaves altogether for an entire harsh season — a cold winter or a scorching hot, dry summer. However, these absorption-lowering strategies are not universally employed by plants because safety (no leaves, no damage) must be balanced against the need for photosynthesis and growth. Most plants do maintain light-harvesting structures that periodically absorb more light than photosynthesis can utilize, and simply remove the excess energy (see below). As an extreme example, slowly growing plants in subalpine regions and in deserts are often evergreen (maintain green leaves!) and rely heavily on the harmless removal of much of the absorbed energy.

Avoidance mechanisms at the scale of the whole plant and the cellular level.
Figure 2: Avoidance mechanisms at the scale of the whole plant and the cellular level.
a,b) As sessile organisms, plants orient their leaves at an angle to minimize light interception: for example, the small-stilted mangrove, Rhizophora stylosa, shown here growing along the eastern coast of Queensland, Australia. a) Leaves on branches growing in the shade are displayed horizontally to maximize light interception. b) In full sunlight, steeply angled leaves minimize sunlight absorption in these slowly growing evergreen plants subject to salt-water stress. c) Many plant species position their chloroplasts (green ovals) such as to minimize the absorption of excess light. Conversely, during exposure to low light, leaves and/or chloroplasts may be moved to maximize light interception and photosynthetic productivity.
© 2012 Nature Education Photo courtesy of W. Adams & B. Demmig-Adams. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use

Yellowed (low chlorophyll) leaves of the evergreen plant common waxflower (<I>Hoya australis</I>) growing along the northeastern coast of New South Wales, Australia.
Figure 3: Yellowed (low chlorophyll) leaves of the evergreen plant common waxflower (Hoya australis) growing along the northeastern coast of New South Wales, Australia.
Common waxflower exhibits leaves with a low chlorophyll content when growing in sunny sites, such as this dry and presumably nutrient-poor rock outcrop. The same species exhibits dark green leaves when growing in sheltered spaces under rock overhangs and in mixed-light, moist forest sites.
© 2012 Nature Education Photo courtesy of W. Adams. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use

Harmless Dissipation of Excess Absorbed Light Directly in the Chloroplast

Absorption of a photon of sunlight propels photosynthetic pigments into their excited state, from which un-utilized energy is readily transferred to oxygen. Such a transfer to oxygen can be prevented by swift de-excitation of the excited pigment, whereby the excitation energy is harmlessly removed as thermal (heat) energy. All plants and photosynthetic algae regularly employ photo-protective thermal dissipation of excess absorbed light. In sunny environments-without any additional stress-plants smoothly and elegantly reconfigure their solar-collector pigment complexes every day, from a state favoring efficient light utilization in the low-light morning hours to ever-increasing levels of efficient thermal dissipation of un-utilized energy towards peak light intensities at noon (Figure 4). Even the fastest growing, most rapidly photosynthesizing crops and weeds dissipate about half of the sunlight they absorb at peak intensity. For more slowly growing evergreen plants, the fraction of dissipated light is even higher, often as much as 90–95% at peak intensity. Under the influence of environmental stresses, thermal dissipation of absorbed, but un-utilized, light changes from this latter pattern, of only being turned on for a few hours a day, to staying at high levels all day long (Figure 4). The greenness of over-wintering needles of conifers (Figure 5) betrays the fact that, in harsh environments with continuously frozen soils, 100% of the absorbed light is dissipated via photo-protective thermal dissipation throughout the winter. None of the absorbed light is utilized for photosynthesis in these over-wintering trees that stop growing and photosynthesizing altogether. The reward for the strategy of keeping green leaves is the almost instant re-activation of photosynthesis (and discontinuation of thermal dissipation) in these evergreens when soils thaw in the spring, and when deciduous trees labor for a month to re-grow their leaves.

Allocation of absorbed sunlight to photosynthesis versus photo-protective dissipation.
Figure 4: Allocation of absorbed sunlight to photosynthesis versus photo-protective dissipation.
Use of absorbed photons (blue) in photosynthesis (P; green) versus thermal dissipation of excess energy (D; red). a) On a clear summer day in sun-exposed leaves under favorable environmental conditions. b) In the presence of environmental stress, such as on a cold winter’s day. A light intensity of 2,000 µmol photons m-2 s-1 corresponds to full sunlight.
© 2012 Nature Education From Demmig-Adams & Adams (2000). All rights reserved. View Terms of Use

Ponderosa pine (foreground) in winter on Flagstaff Mountain in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains west of Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Figure 5: Ponderosa pine (foreground) in winter on Flagstaff Mountain in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains west of Boulder, Colorado, USA.
This conifer, as well as other over-wintering evergreens in the same habitat, maintains dark green needles/leaves even when photosynthesis ceases completely in the winter (c.f., Figure 4b).
© 2012 Nature Education Photo courtsey of M. Adams. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use

A Peek at Dissipation Mechanisms

The key mechanism for thermal dissipation involves a group of yellow (xanthophyll) pigments, specific ones of which facilitate the harmless dissipation of excess energy from photosynthesis' light-collecting pigments (Figure 6). In sunny, low-stress environments, leaves contain a non-dissipating xanthophyll in the morning and gradually convert this to a closely related xanthophyll, the main dissipater zeaxanthin, by midday. The plant species (those with the lowest photosynthesis rates) featuring the highest zeaxanthin levels dissipate the most light. On the other hand, evergreen plants subjected to environmental stresses (that lower photosynthesis rates and increase excess light levels) arrest their xanthophyll conversions and keep high levels of zeaxanthin (and thermal dissipation) in place all day long. Thermal dissipation is not activated by the mere presence of zeaxanthin, but requires an additional trigger for the actual engagement of dissipation. In over-wintering conifers in frozen soils, zeaxanthin levels and dissipation engagement remain high all winter. In contrast, leaves under the canopy of a rainforest-intermittently pierced by intense shafts of sunlight-keep zeaxanthin around all day, instantly engage thermal dissipation during each sunfleck, and then bounce back to efficient utilization of the low background level of light for photosynthesis.

Photoprotection by dissipation of excess light energy aided by xanthophyll cycle carotenoids.
Figure 6: Photoprotection by dissipation of excess light energy aided by xanthophyll cycle carotenoids.
The xanthophyll violaxanthin is converted to zeaxanthin (via the intermediate antheraxanthin) whenever chloroplasts absorb excess light. Zeaxanthin acts as a key facilitator of the dissipation of excess 1Chl*. Conversely, when light is not excessive, zeaxanthin is disengaged from energy dissipation and converted back to violaxanthin, thereby returning to an efficient utilization of light energy in photosynthesis.
© 2012 Nature Education All rights reserved. View Terms of Use

Zeaxanthin-facilitated thermal dissipation of excess energy appears to require the least investment of metabolic energy to put and keep in place (and never more so than when long-term retention of high zeaxanthin levels is involved) compared to other photo-protective mechanisms, and this may be the reason why the former is so ubiquitously employed. At the same time, the de-excitation of the very same state of chlorophyll otherwise used to drive photosynthesis potentially cuts into the efficiency of photosynthetic light utilization, thus warranting the multi-level fine-tuning and control of its engagement in harmless dissipation. Remarkably, zeaxanthin also plays a key role in the protection of the human/animal eye against damage by intense light. In contrast to plants, which synthesize as much zeaxanthin as they need, animals do not possess the ability to synthesize zeaxanthin, and instead depend on their diet for supplying this critical protector. In addition to serving as a photo-protector, zeaxanthin also functions as a multi-purpose antioxidant that can detoxify reactive oxygen and its derivates in both plants and animals. In humans, zeaxanthin likely plays a role in protection against a number of chronic diseases.

Detoxification of Reactive Oxygen Formed

While thermal dissipation of energy is instrumental in preventing the formation of reactive oxygen, additional photo-protective mechanisms exist to detoxify any reactive oxygen that is formed (Figure 7). In a series of steps, reactive oxygen is rendered non-reactive and ultimately converted to harmless H2O or O2. While some of these processes can proceed in metabolically inactive leaves, others depend on metabolic energy and on enzymes, whose availability and function may be diminished under severe stress. All photosynthetic organisms employ photo-protective detoxification, but the latter is not the main route for excess energy removal. This may be due in part to the energy cost of detoxification and in part to the fact that removal of already formed reactive oxygen is not as pro-active and "safe" as the removal of excess energy by thermal dissipation before reactive oxygen is formed.

Antioxidation of harmful reactive oxygen generated under excess light, which acts as a sink for un-utilized electrons.
Figure 7: Antioxidation of harmful reactive oxygen generated under excess light, which acts as a sink for un-utilized electrons.
a) One example of reactive oxygen is generated when electrons (e-) not utilized in photosynthesis (or photorespiration) are donated to oxygen, thus creating superoxide (O2.-) that can be converted to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by superoxide dismutase enzymes (SOD). The H2O2 is further converted to harmless water (H2O) by ascorbate peroxidase enzymes (APX) utilizing ascorbate (Asc) as an electron donor that, in turn, becomes oxidized ascorbate (ox-Asc). Additional electrons are consumed via the conversion of ox-Asc back to Asc or the conversion of double ox-Asc (generated by an additional reaction forming one Asc and one double ox-Asc from two ox-Asc) back to Asc using glutathione (with the resulting oxidized glutathione, in turn, being re-reduced by electrons from electron transport by means of glutathione reductase enzymes, GR). b) Enzymatic activities (expressed on a leaf fresh weight [FW] basis) of superoxide dismutase (SOD; SOD units (g FW)-1 hr-1), Ascorbate peroxidase (APX; μmol Asc (g FW)-1 hr-1) and glutathione reductase (GR; μmol NADPH (g FW)-1 hr-1) levels increase in leaves of plants exposed to high light levels during leaf development (redrawn from Grace & Logan 1996). Light intensities were 20 (low), 100 (med=medium), and 1200 (high) µmol photons m-2 s-1, respectively.
© 2012 Nature Education All rights reserved. View Terms of Use

Each Environmental Challenge Begets its Own Specific Photo-Protective Solution

The existence of a multitude of alternative or concurrent photo-protective processes to make the absorption of sunlight for photosynthesis safe underlines the critical importance of photo-protection. However, this suite of multiple photo-protective mechanisms does not merely constitute redundant layers of safety nets, but occurs in nature in varied combinations that meet the distinct challenges presented by each specific environment as well as by the needs of plant species with contrasting life spans and growth rates.

Not surprisingly, all photosynthetic organisms possess a suite of formidable photo-protective mechanisms that are used on a daily basis. However, among different plant species, the exact combination of photo-protective mechanisms employed varies tremendously depending on-for example-growth rate and growth pattern. For instance, a fast-growing, short-lived annual (with a high rate of photosynthesis) requires less photo-protection compared to a slow-growing, long-lived evergreen (with a low rate of photosynthesis). In a nutshell, the lower the photosynthesis rate of a plant, the greater its need for photo-protection. Moreover, the magnitude of photo-protection needed varies greatly depending on the environment. Favorable environmental conditions-for example, those with plenty of water and nutrients for plant growth-favor high photosynthesis rates and thereby maximize utilization of absorbed sunlight in photosynthesis. In contrast, drought, nutrient deficiency, excessive heat or cold, and many other unfavorable conditions or stresses, slow plant growth and lower the rate of photosynthesis, and thereby increase the fraction of absorbed light that remains un-utilized.

References and Recommended Reading


Adams, W. W. III. & Demmig-Adams, B. "Photoprotection (Plants)." McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science & Technology 2012, 11 (13). (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2012) 490-493.

Adams, W. W. III. et al. Photoprotective strategies of overwintering evergreens. BioScience 54, 41-49 (2004).

Apel, K. & Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Reviews of Plant Biology 55, 373-399 (2004).

Demmig-Adams, B. & Adams, W. W. III. Harvesting sunlight safely. Nature 403, 371-374 (2000).

———. Antioxidants in photosynthesis and human nutrition. Science 298, 2149-2153 (2002).

———. Photoprotection in an ecological context: The remarkable complexity of thermal dissipation. New Phytologist 172, 11-21 (2006).

Demmig-Adams, B., Adams, W. W. III. & Mattoo, A. K. eds. Photoprotection, Photoinhibition, Gene Regulation, and Environment. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, 21. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006.

Demmig-Adams, B., Rixham, C. S. & Adams, W. W. III. "Carotenoids," in McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science & Technology 2012 11 (3) (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2012) 549-555.

Foyer, C. H. & Noctor, G. Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: Signaling, acclimation, and practical implications. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 11, 861-905 (2009).

Grace, S. C. & Logan, B. A. Acclimation of foliar antioxidant systems to growth irradiance in three broad-leaved evergreen species. Plant Physiology 112, 1631-1640 (1996).

Kashahara, M. et al. Chloroplast avoidance movement reduces photodamage in plants. Nature 420, 829-832 (2002).

Niyogi, K. K. Photoprotection revisited: Genetic and molecular approaches. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50, 333-359 (1999).

Niyogi, K. K. Safety valves for photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3, 455-460 (2000).

van Zanten, M. et al. On the relevance and control of leaf angle. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 29, 300-316 (2010).

Zhirong, L. et al. Sensing and responding to excess light. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60, 239-260 (2009).

Email

Flag Inappropriate

This content is currently under construction.

Connect
Connect Send a message


Nature Education Home

Physiological Ecology

Visual Browse

Close