This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
Email
October 21, 2015 | By:  Gary McDowell
Aa Aa Aa
Advocating for changes to science at Future of Research Boston 2015

By: David T Riglar, PhD, Harvard Medical School

This week young biomedical researchers will meet in Boston for the second Future of Research (FOR) symposium. This event, which runs from Thursday October 23 - Saturday October 24, aims to identify and this year start to solve some of the systemic problems facing the biomedical research sector (Alberts et al, 2014).

This blog post will focus on the content of 2 of the 6 fantastic panels that will be held throughout the event. Both panels aim to better define the issues surrounding trainee scientists, the first from the perspective of grassroots advocacy groups and the second from an institution level perspective. For more information on the event as a whole, the content of other panels and to register for the event please go to futureofresearch.org. Live streaming of Thursday and Friday's sessions will also be available here.

A big year for grassroots advocacy

A year is a long time in science, and also in science policy. The first FOR symposium, held just over a year ago in Boston marked a critical foray by young scientists into an ongoing discussion about the state of the biomedical research enterprise (Alberts et al, 2014).

Over the past year, similar FOR events have also been held in the San Francisco Bay Area and New York (The NYU Postdocs Interdisciplinary Symposium), with Chicago also hosting its first local FOR event next week (see here for a recent ConferenceCast post about the Chicago meeting). FOR representatives have also been busy leading sessions at various other meetings (for example a follow-up session by FOR Boston 2014 lead organizers at the 2014 American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) which can be watched here) and discussing the outcomes of these meetings more broadly, most notably through publication of a white paper summarizing the FOR Boston 2014 event (McDowell et al, 2014).

While the focus has so far been on the US, many of the outcomes from these events are equally relevant internationally. For example, I have previously discussed the relevance of FOR Boston 2014 outcomes to the Australian system here.

On Thursday, FOR Boston 2015 will kick off with a summary of what has been achieved so far at these events, with input from Dr Kristin Krukenburg -FOR Boston 2014; Dr Abigail Anderson - NYU Postdocs Interdisciplinary Symposium 2015 (NYU PoIntS 2015); and Dr Kyle Dolan - FOR Chicago 2015.

Joining them on this first panel will be representatives of two postdoc associations - Dr Juliet Moncaster from the National Postdoctoral Association and Dr Tobias Otto from the Boston Postdoctoral Association. These associations have also been working to support and advocate for postdocs.

The known knowns and the known unknowns

Joining our ‘grassroots' panelists on stage for the second session of FOR Boston 2015 are a set of panelists equally intent on supporting the cause of trainee researchers, but from a different perspective: Dr Sarah Hokanson, Director of Professional Development and Postdoctoral Affairs at Boston University; Dr Dana Bresee Keeth, Director of Postdoctoral Services at Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dr Dan Jay, Faculty member responsible for postdocs at Tufts University; Dr Cynthia Fuhrmann, Assistant Dean of Career & Professional Development at University of Massachusetts Medical School; and Dr Jim Gould, Director of the Office of Postdoctoral Fellows at Harvard Medical School, who will not be present, but who has contributed answers to questions that will be raised during this session.

These panelists represent offices at five Boston institutes that work to support the ambitions of their postdoc constituents (which number in the order of 9000 postdocs), whether that is through ongoing education opportunities, social activities or the provision of career advice or assistance.

Together, discussion with members of these two panels will frame the ongoing efforts of grassroots and institution- level groups to support postdocs, ultimately focusing on various aspects of data collection, and in particular questions such as:

What data is currently collected?

What data should be collected and how they would help to support postdocs?

and

How can we achieve this effectively?

What else is happening at FOR Boston 2015?

The panels introduced here are just 2 of the great discussions that will be occurring during FOR Boston 2015. Friday 22 October will see our keynote address by Paula Stephen, Professor of Economics at Georgia State University, who will discuss the economics that drive the current postdoctoral position. Panels will then discuss the academic labor market, the many career paths taken by those achieving a biomedical PhD, the role of young scientists in publishing (sponsored by Elsevier) and the diversity of individuals that undertake a postdoc. Further details on these sessions are available at futureofresearch.org/boston, as well as here and here.

What can I do to help?

You don't have to just listen (register or stream sessions live at futureofresearch.org)! The final day of FOR Boston 2015 will be an American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) sponsored Hack Day where you can contribute more tangibly. More information on the hack day can be found here.

David T Riglar is a postdoc at Harvard Medical School. In the lab, he uses synthetic biology to create tools to better understand human disease. Outside the lab, he is interested in communicating science and in the intersection between science and public policy. Follow David on Twitter @driglar

References:

Alberts, B., Kirschner, M. W., Tilghman, S., & Varmus, H. (2014). Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(16), 5773-5777. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404402111

McDowell, G. S., Gunsalus, K. T. W., MacKellar, D. C., Mazzilli, S. A., Pai, V. P., Goodwin, P. R., et al. (2014). Shaping the Future of Research: a perspective from junior scientists. F1000Research, 1-21. http://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5878.1


September 19, 2015 | By:  Gary McDowell
Aa Aa Aa
Chicago Postdocs To Discuss Training, Science Policy at Future of Research Symposium

By: Kyle Dolan, PhD, and Rianne Ellenbroek, PhD, University of Chicago

Event date: Oct. 29, 2015

We can't wait for October in Chicago this year.

Fall foliage on the Lake Michigan shoreline. The return of sweater weather. The Cubs going all the way to a World Series title (well, at least we're allowed to dream, right?).

Most of all, we can't wait for October 29th. On that day, Chicago-area postdocs will present the first Future of Research (FOR) Chicago Symposium.

The FOR Chicago Symposium is a response to, and a continuation of, a national conversation regarding changes in American science policy and scientific culture. The symposium will invite its audience, particularly young scientists in training, to consider several fundamental questions: how do we insure the continued success of the American scientific enterprise into the 21st century? How do we keep STEM fields desirable for people to pursue, both intellectually and as a career path? And, how do we prepare people to be both good scientists and good citizens in the context of today's society?

The all-day event will showcase keynote talks from Gregory Petsko and Keith Yamamoto, both esteemed scientists noted for their outspoken advocacy for young scientists and reforms in scientific training. A panel discussion will feature guests from the local and national arenas of academia, industry, funding, government, and advocacy. And, in the grassroots spirit of the Future of Research conference series, we'll invite our participants to share their ideas on building a better scientific enterprise through a series of workshops on the themes of training, funding, and science culture. From these conversations, we'll gather the opinions of attendees to synthesize a series of policy recommendations to be shared with key stakeholders and the community at large.

Our organizational team consists of postdocs, faculty, and administrators from several major Chicago-area universities. These dedicated volunteers, with the support of our local postdoc administrations and postdoc offices have put in a huge effort over the past six months to get this event up and running.

The event promises to be an amazing gathering. We had over 120 people pre-register: postdocs, graduate students, faculty, and people outside of academia. People signed up from as far away as Minnesota and Nebraska. We have a fantastic venue at Northwestern's Prentice Hospital, in the heart of downtown Chicago, steps away from Lake Michigan.

The problems facing science today present an opportunity for transformative change. It will take scientists working together with a broad group of allies to make sure that the future of science remains bright. If you're reading this and you've signed up for the FOR Chicago Symposium, we look forward to seeing you. If you're reading this and you haven't signed up, we hope you'll join us.


September 13, 2015 | By:  Gary McDowell
Aa Aa Aa
Listening to our universe with gravitational waves - From ComSciCon

ComSciCon is a workshop series organized by graduate students, for graduate students, focused on science communication skills. This is the third in a series of posts which showcases talent from the ComSciCon 2015, the national meeting in Cambridge, MA. You can find more details about the meeting here. We hope this can give an example of actual output that can come from conferences, the subject of upcoming blogposts. This piece is by Béatrice Bonga, a graduate student at Pennsylvania State University.

Imagine watching a movie with the sound off. How much would you enjoy and understand this movie? Surprisingly, this is what scientists who study stars, galaxies and other objects in the sky have been doing until now! Basically everything we know about our universe is through light: not just light in the visible range, but also through infrared light, x-rays and radio waves. But imagine that we could also "listen" to what happens in the universe, wouldn't that be fantastic? Scientists are at the verge of detecting gravitational waves, which just like sound waves are qualitatively different from light. This detection would "open our ears" and be an entirely new window to learn more about our universe.

Gravitational waves: ripples in space-time

So what are these gravitational waves? Space and time are kinda fluid, therefore scientists combine them in one object: space-time. Now light rides as waves on space-time, whereas gravitational waves are waves of space-time itself! These gravitational waves cause small fluctuations in the force of gravity that in principle one should be able to measure directly, but so far scientists have been unsuccessful in doing so. Why is that? In order to measure their effects, we need to be able to measure distances extremely precisely. The minimum precision required is like measuring the distance to the nearest star outside our solar system, Proxima Centauri, down to 10 micrometers (roughly one tenth of a newspaper page)!

Exciting new science on the horizon

Visionary scientists started this endeavor in the 60s, eventually resulting in aLIGO (advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave-Observatory) in 2002. aLIGO is the biggest science project ever funded by the National Science Foundation. Currently, more than 650 scientists from 59 institutions in 11 countries are working together on this ambitious project. The first test runs are complete. We can expect the official science runs in September 2015, next month! Hopefully soon, gravitational waves will be detected.

My research: the influence of the expansion of our universe on gravitational waves

In 2011, the Nobel Prize for physics was given to a group of astronomers who showed in 1998 that our universe is expanding in an accelerated fashion. I study the effects of this expansion on gravitational waves together with my advisor Professor Abhay Ashtekar and fellow grad student Aruna Kesavan. Understanding gravitational waves mathematically is quite tricky, even without incorporating the expansion of our universe. Physicists argued for years whether gravitational waves are real or mathematical artifacts. In fact, even Einstein himself, after he predicted the existence of gravitational waves in 1917, was not so sure any more about their reality in the 1930s. Only in the 1960s was this resolved with the development of a new mathematical framework.

Unfortunately, this mathematical framework is not valid when you take the accelerated expansion into account. So far, physicists have done simple calculations to estimate the effect of this expansion on gravitational waves. However, the relevant equations are extremely intricate and it can be quite difficult to separate physics and mathematical abstractions in these equations. It is a little bit like your friend telling you that she earned 1000 points in a game - without telling you which game she played. In this analogy, the 1000 points is the mathematical abstraction, and determining what this number means is the physics part. Maybe she played a game in which the maximum score is 1000 points, then her result is fantastic! Or, she played a game with a maximum number of 3 billion points , then her 1000 points are not such a good outcome. Likewise, the equations can fool you too: sometimes it appears as if there are large gravitational waves, but in reality they are small or even non-existent! The new framework being developed removes all these ambiguities. This is essential for a better theoretical understanding of gravitational waves in our expanding universe. in turn it will help experimenters better interpret their data.

Conclusion

The sources that aLIGO expects to see gravitational waves from are relatively close by on cosmological scales and are therefore not expected to be affected much by the expansion of our universe. However, the development of the new framework that takes the expansion of our universe into account is crucial for a solid theoretical understanding of gravitational waves now. In the future, it might also be important for experiments. Since gravitational waves are an entirely new way of experiencing the universe - much like listening is completely different from seeing - this new theoretical framework may help us "listen better" to our universe.


Short Biography: Béatrice Bonga studies how gravitational waves are affected by the expansion of our universe at the Pennsylvania State University as part of her Ph. D. program. After obtaining her BSc in Physics and a BA in Psychology from Utrecht University in the Netherlands, she realized that she was truly passionate about physics and went on to earn her master's degree in Theoretical Physics (also at Utrecht University). In addition to physics, Béatrice also loves tea and cappuccinos and is always in for zumba or yoga.

  • « Newer Posts
  • |
  • Older Posts »
Blogger Profiles
Recent Posts

« Prev Next »

Connect
Connect Send a message

Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Blogs