Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Bulk fatigue induced by surface reconstruction in layered Ni-rich cathodes for Li-ion batteries

Nature Materials volume 20, pages 84–92 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Ni-rich layered cathode materials are among the most promising candidates for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries, yet their degradation mechanisms are still poorly understood. We report a structure-driven degradation mechanism for NMC811 (LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2), in which a proportion of the material exhibits a lowered accessible state of charge at the end of charging after repetitive cycling and becomes fatigued. Operando synchrotron long-duration X-ray diffraction enabled by a laser-thinned coin cell shows the emergence and growth in the concentration of this fatigued phase with cycle number. This degradation is structure driven and is not solely due to kinetic limitations or intergranular cracking: no bulk phase transformations, no increase in Li/Ni antisite mixing and no notable changes in the local structure or Li-ion mobility of the bulk are seen in aged NMCs. Instead, we propose that this degradation stems from the high interfacial lattice strain between the reconstructed surface and the bulk layered structure that develops when the latter is at states of charge above a distinct threshold of approximately 75%. This mechanism is expected to be universal in Ni-rich layered cathodes. Our findings provide fundamental insights into strategies to help mitigate this degradation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Pristine polycrystalline NMC811.
Fig. 2: Operando long-duration SR-PXRD investigation of an NMC811/graphite full cell.
Fig. 3: Structural analysis of fresh and aged NMC811 cathodes.
Fig. 4: Single-crystal NMC cathodes.
Fig. 5: Interfacial lattice strain induced fatigue degradation of Ni-rich layered cathodes.
Fig. 6: High-resolution STEM analysis of NMC811.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Tarascon, J. M. & Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414, 359–367 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blomgren, G. E. The development and future of lithium ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A5019–A5025 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J. et al. Prospect and reality of Ni-rich cathode for commercialization. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1702028 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manthiram, A., Song, B. & Li, W. A perspective on nickel-rich layered oxide cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 6, 125–139 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Myung, S.-T. et al. Nickel-rich layered cathode materials for automotive lithium-ion batteries: achievements and perspectives. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 196–223 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, W., Erickson, E. M. & Manthiram, A. High-nickel layered oxide cathodes for lithium-based automotive batteries. Nat. Energy 5, 26–34 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Noh, H.-J., Youn, S., Yoon, C. S. & Sun, Y.-K. Comparison of the structural and electrochemical properties of layered Li[NixCoyMnz]O2 (x = 1/3, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.85) cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 233, 121–130 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jung, R., Metzger, M., Maglia, F., Stinner, C. & Gasteiger, H. A. Oxygen release and its effect on the cycling stability of LiNixMnyCozO2 (NMC) cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1361–A1377 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryu, H.-H., Park, K.-J., Yoon, C. S. & Sun, Y.-K. Capacity fading of Ni-rich Li[NixCoyMn1–x–y]O2 (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.95) cathodes for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries: bulk or surface degradation. Chem. Mater. 30, 1155–1163 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedrich, F. et al. Editors’ choice—capacity fading mechanisms of NCM-811 cathodes in lithium-ion batteries studied by X-ray diffraction and other diagnostics. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A3760–A3774 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Biasi, L. et al. Chemical, structural, and electronic aspects of formation and degradation behavior on different length scales of Ni-rich NCM and Li-rich HE-NCM cathode materials in Li-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 0, 1900985 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, F. et al. Profiling the nanoscale gradient in stoichiometric layered cathode particles for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3077 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, F. et al. Surface reconstruction and chemical evolution of stoichiometric layered cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 5, 3529 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xiao, P., Shi, T., Huang, W. & Ceder, G. Understanding surface densified phases in Ni-rich layered compounds. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 811–818 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tian, C., Lin, F. & Doeff, M. M. Electrochemical characteristics of layered transition metal oxide cathode materials for lithium ion batteries: surface, bulk behavior, and thermal properties. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 89–96 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Radin, M. D. et al. Narrowing the gap between theoretical and practical capacities in Li-ion layered oxide cathode materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602888 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, Y. et al. Coupled LiPF6 decomposition and carbonate dehydrogenation enhanced by highly covalent metal oxides in high-energy Li-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 27368–27382 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Y. et al. Revealing electrolyte oxidation via carbonate dehydrogenation on Ni-based oxides in Li-ion batteries by in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 183–199 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, W. et al. Mn versus Al in layered oxide cathodes in lithium-ion batteries: a comprehensive evaluation on long-term cyclability. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703154 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Delmas, C., Fouassier, C. & Hagenmuller, P. Structural classification and properties of the layered oxides. Phys. B+C 99, 81–85 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, W., Reimers, J. & Dahn, J. In situ X-ray diffraction and electrochemical studies of Li1−xNiO2. Solid State Ion. 67, 123–130 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, H., Zhang, N., Li, J. & Dahn, J. R. Updating the structure and electrochemistry of LixNiO2 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A2985–A2993 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. de Biasi, L. et al. Phase transformation behavior and stability of LiNiO2 cathode material for Li-ion batteries obtained from in situ gas analysis and operando X-ray diffraction. ChemSusChem 12, 2240–2250 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Croguennec, L., Pouillerie, C. & Delmas, C. NiO2 obtained by electrochemical lithium deintercalation from lithium nickelate: structural modifications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 1314–1321 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kondrakov, A. O. et al. Anisotropic lattice strain and mechanical degradation of high- and low-nickel NCM cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 3286–3294 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Märker, K., Reeves, P. J., Xu, C., Griffith, K. J. & Grey, C. P. Evolution of structure and lithium dynamics in LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811) cathodes during electrochemical cycling. Chem. Mater. 31, 2545–2554 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kleiner, K. et al. Fatigue of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 in commercial Li ion batteries. J. Power Sources 273, 70–82 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, H. et al. Intergranular cracking as a major cause of long-term capacity fading of layered cathodes. Nano Lett. 17, 3452–3457 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schweidler, S. et al. Investigation into mechanical degradation and fatigue of high-Ni NCM cathode material: a long-term cycling study of full cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 7375–7384 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gilbert, J. A. et al. Cycling behavior of NCM523/graphite lithium-ion cells in the 3–4.4 V range: diagnostic studies of full cells and harvested electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A6054–A6065 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Makimura, Y. et al. Factors affecting cycling life of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 8350–8358 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Grey, C. P. & Dupré, N. NMR studies of cathode materials for lithium-ion rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 104, 4493–4512 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pell, A. J., Pintacuda, G. & Grey, C. P. Paramagnetic NMR in solution and the solid state. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 111, 1–271 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, H. et al. Identifying the chemical and structural irreversibility in LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2—a model compound for classical layered intercalation. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 4189–4198 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hwang, S. et al. Investigation of changes in the surface structure of LixNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode materials induced by the initial charge. Chem. Mater. 26, 1084–1092 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sasaki, S., Fujino, K. & Takéuchi, Y. X-ray determination of electron-density distributions in oxides, MgO, MnO, CoO, and NiO, and atomic scattering factors of their constituent atoms. Proc. Jpn. Acad. B 55, 43–48 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan, P. et al. Intragranular cracking as a critical barrier for high-voltage usage of layer-structured cathode for lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 8, 14101 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goonetilleke, D. et al. Structural evolution and high-voltage structural stability of Li(NixMnyCoz)O2 electrodes. Chem. Mater. 31, 376–386 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Long, B. R. et al. Enabling high-energy, high-voltage lithium-ion cells: standardization of coin-cell assembly, electrochemical testing, and evaluation of full cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A2999–A3009 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Murray, C. A. et al. New synchrotron powder diffraction facility for long-duration experiments. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 50, 172–183 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Coelho, A. Topas Academic version 4.1 (Coelho Software, 2007).

  42. Bielecki, A. & Burum, D. P. Temperature dependence of 207Pb MAS spectra of solid lead nitrate: an accurate, sensitive thermometer for variable-temperature MAS. J. Magn. Reson. A 116, 215–220 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Kleiner, K. J. Griffith, O. Pecher and W. Meng for their support with the long-duration XRD experiments, and J. Morzy and J. Lu for assisting in the TEM experiments. C.X. thanks M. Jones and H. Liu for discussions on the XRD data analysis. This work is supported by the Faraday Institution under grant no. FIRG001. C.X. acknowledges support from a Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Experimental Design Award from the STFC Batteries Network (grant no. ST/R006873/1). S.P.E. was funded via an EPSRC iCASE (award no. 1834544) and via the Royal Society (grant no. RP\R1\180147). M.F.G. thanks the German Research Foundation (DFG, Research Fellowship GR nos 5342/1-1 and 5342/2-1) for funding.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Matthias F. Groh

    Present address: Institute for Inorganic Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Chao Xu, Katharina Märker, Philip J. Reeves, Matthias F. Groh, Steffen P. Emge & Clare P. Grey

  2. The Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK

    Chao Xu, Katharina Märker, Juhan Lee, Amoghavarsha Mahadevegowda, Philip J. Reeves, Caterina Ducati, B. Layla Mehdi & Clare P. Grey

  3. Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Juhan Lee & B. Layla Mehdi

  4. Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Amoghavarsha Mahadevegowda & Caterina Ducati

  5. Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK

    Sarah J. Day & Chiu C. Tang

Authors
  1. Chao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharina Märker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juhan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amoghavarsha Mahadevegowda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philip J. Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sarah J. Day
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matthias F. Groh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Steffen P. Emge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Caterina Ducati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. B. Layla Mehdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chiu C. Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Clare P. Grey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.X. and C.P.G. conceived the idea of the study. C.X. performed the electrochemistry and SEM experiments and analysed the results. C.X. conducted the PXRD experiments and analysed the data with support from S.J.D., M.F.G., S.P.E. and C.C.T. in the LDE experiments. C.X., K.M. and P.J.R. performed the ssNMR experiments and analysed the data. J.L., A.M., C.D. and B.L.M. conducted the (S)TEM experiments and analysed the results. C.X., K.M. and C.P.G. wrote the manuscript with input from all coauthors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare P. Grey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Electrochemistry of the operando long-duration NMC/Gr full-cell.

a, Capacity retention of the LDE cell and standard coin cells made in-house. The spikes in discharge capacity are attributed to the slow diagnostic cycles (C/20 rate) performed once every 50 ageing cycles. The error bars represent the standard deviations for the data obtained for two cells. b, Voltage profiles of the LDE NMC811/graphite full-cell at cycle numbers of 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500. These cycles are all performed at the same rate of C/2.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Diffraction results of two operando long-duration cells in initial cycles.

a–f, Voltage profiles and the corresponding diffraction patterns of two operando long-duration full-cells: (a–c) in the 6th cycle for the cell with a upper cutoff voltage (UCV) of 4.2 V, and (d–f) in the 4th cycle for the cell with a UCV of 4.3 V. g, h, Evolutions of the lattice parameters of the NMC cathode in the cell with a UCV of 4.2 V (g) and 4.3 V (h), respectively. The electrolyte used in both of these two cells was 1 M LiPF6 in EC:EMC 3:7 with 2 wt% vinylene carbonate, and both cells were cycled with a lower cutoff voltage of 2.5 V and at a rate of C/2 using CCCV charge – CC discharge protocol. Regime 1 highlighted in (g) represents the SoC range where the c parameter increases as the SoC increases and Regime 2 represents the SoC range where c decreases as the SoC increases.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Ex-situ SR-PXRD pattern of an electrochemically aged NMC at a charged state (4.3 V versus Li/Li+).

a, SR-PXRD pattern of an electrochemically aged NMC at a charged state (4.3 V versus Li/Li+) after 300 cycles along with fit performed using three rhombohedral \(R\bar 3m\) phases with different lattice parameters (termed active, intermediate and fatigued). The final SoC was reached by charging the aged NMC in a half-cell at a rate of C/20 with a voltage hold until the current dropped below C/1000. b. Expansion of the region containing the (003) reflection in (a).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Laboratory PXRD results of the fatigued and fresh NMC.

a, X-ray diffraction pattern of the fresh NMC811 at 4.2 V, and aged NMC811 at 4.2 V and 4.3 V. b, Expanded (003) region. c, Fitting of the Rietveld refinement against the bottom diffraction pattern in a, corresponds to the aged NMC811 at 4.3 V after 1200 cycles. Owing to the poor quality of the pattern which was obtained from a laboratory diffractometer as compared to that from synchrotron, we were unable to resolve the intermediate phase and the Rietveld refinement was carried out using two rhombohedral phases. The obtained refinement results are: (1) active phase: phase fraction = 53(1) %, a = b = 2.8158(2) Å, c = 14.080(2) Å, SoC ≈ 84 %; (2) fatigued phase: phase fraction = 47(1) %, a = b = 2.8186(2) Å, c = 14.386(2) Å, SoC ≈ 76 %.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Experimental and calculated 7Li ssNMR spectra at variable temperatures.

Comparisons of modelled (red dashed line) and experimental (black solid line, identical to Fig. 3b, c) 7Li variable temperature (VT) NMR spectra for “fresh” NMC811 at 4.2 V (top) and aged NMC811 held at 4.2 V (bottom). In all cases a motionally averaged sharp component corresponding to Li ions with high mobility (blue dotted lines) and a non-averaged component corresponding to Li ions with lower mobility (green dotted lines) were required to produce good agreement between experiment and calculation. The Li hopping rates of the high mobility component as well as its fraction of the total signal integral are plotted in Extended Data Fig. 6. More detailed discussions associated with the results are in the Supplementary Information.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Calculated Li hopping rates and fraction of the high mobility component from VT NMR results.

a, b, Calculated hopping rates for the high mobility signal component for fresh (a) and aged (b) NMC811 samples as a function of temperature. Different v1/2,noexch values were used for calculating the hopping rates (see legend in plot). Blue and red shading have been added to the plot for illustrational purposes. c, Proportion of the high mobility component for fresh (blue) and aged (red) NMC samples as a function of temperature. More detailed discussions associated with these results are given in the Supplementary Information.

Extended Data Fig. 7 7Li VT ssNMR spectra of an aged NMC cathode after 1200 cycles at 4.3 V versus Li compared to fresh samples.

7Li VT ssNMR spectra of an aged NMC cathode after 1200 cycles at 4.3 V versus Li (top panel), a fresh NMC at 4.2 V (middle panel) and 4.4 V (bottom panel). The final SoC of the aged sample was achieved by charging the cathode in a half cell at a rate of C/20 and with a voltage hold at 4.3 V until the current drops below C/1000, and the corresponding diffraction analysis is shown in Extended Data Fig. 4c. Spectra were acquired at variable temperatures at 4.7 T magnetic field strength and 60 kHz MAS frequency. The same scaling factor was applied for the spectra of each sample, and the spectra for different samples are shown with arbitrary scaling. See more discussion in the Supplementary Information.

Extended Data Fig. 8 DF-STEM images of the surface of an aged NMC811 particle.

The surface of the particle is uniformly covered by a rock salt layer. The NMC sample for STEM imaging was aged for 300 cycles, and the final SoC was at 4.3 V versus Li. A single crystalline particle was examined by STEM. We observed that the particle was uniformly covered by a rock salt layer along the surface as highlighted in red. No rock salt structure was observed inside the particle. Several images are shown in the inset as examples. All images were taken along the [100] zone axis of the layered NMC structure.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Single-crystal NMC: SR-PXRD and electrochemical performance.

a, SR-PXRD pattern of the single-crystal NMC. b, Discharge capacity retention of a single-crystal NMC/graphite full-cell at a rate of C/2 between 2.5 V and 4.2 V. The electrolyte used was LP57 (1 M LiPF6, EC/EMC 3/7) with 2 wt% VC. The apparent “spikes” in discharge capacity arise from the slow diagnostic cycles (C/20 rate) performed once every 50 ageing cycles. c, Voltage profiles of a single-crystal NMC/graphite full-cell at ageing cycles of 98, 198, 298, 398 and 498. These cycles are all performed at the same rate of C/2.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–7, Tables 1–4 and discussion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, C., Märker, K., Lee, J. et al. Bulk fatigue induced by surface reconstruction in layered Ni-rich cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Nat. Mater. 20, 84–92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0767-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0767-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing