Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Understanding hydrogen electrocatalysis by probing the hydrogen-bond network of water at the electrified Pt–solution interface

Nature Energy volume 8, pages 859–869 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Rational construction of the electrode–solution interface where electrochemical processes occur is of paramount importance in electrochemistry. Efforts to gain better control and understanding of the interface have been hindered by lack of probing methods. Here we show that the hydrogen evolution and oxidation reactions (HER/HOR) catalysed by platinum in base can be promoted by introduction of N-methylimidazoles at the platinum–water interface. In situ spectroscopic characterization together with simulations indicate that the N-methylimidazoles facilitate diffusion of hydroxides across the interface by holding the second layer of water close to platinum surfaces, thereby promoting the HER/HOR. We thus propose that the HER/HOR kinetics of platinum in acid and base is governed by diffusion of protons and hydroxides, respectively, through the hydrogen-bond network of interfacial water by the Grotthuss mechanism. Moreover, we demonstrate a 40% performance improvement of an anion exchange membrane electrolyser by adding 1,2-dimethylimidazole into the alkali fed into its platinum cathode.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Structurally dependent promotion effects of organic compounds on the HOR/HER of Pt.
Fig. 2: N-methylimidazoles promote the HOR/HER of Pt through the N3···H2O bonding.
Fig. 3: In situ probe of interfacial water and N-dimethylimidazoles.
Fig. 4: The Volmer step at the H2O–Pt(100) interface with/without Me-N1C2.
Fig. 5: Proposed mechanisms for the Volmer process on Pt surfaces.
Fig. 6: Me-N1C2 improves the AEMEL performance.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and its Supplementary Information. Additional data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Sheng, W. et al. Correlating hydrogen oxidation and evolution activity on platinum at different pH with measured hydrogen binding energy. Nat. Commun. 6, 5848 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng, J., Sheng, W., Zhuang, Z., Xu, B. & Yan, Y. Universal dependence of hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction activity of platinum-group metals on pH and hydrogen binding energy. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501602 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durst, J. et al. New insights into the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction mechanism. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2255–2260 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McCrum, I. T. & Koper, M. T. M. The role of adsorbed hydroxide in hydrogen evolution reaction kinetics on modified platinum. Nat. Energy 5, 891–899 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, E. et al. Unifying the hydrogen evolution and oxidation reactions kinetics in base by identifying the catalytic roles of hydroxyl-water-cation adducts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 3232–3239 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, J. et al. Experimental poof of the bifunctional mechanism for the hydrogen oxidation in alkaline media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 15594–15598 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strmcnik, D. et al. Improving the hydrogen oxidation reaction rate by promotion of hydroxyl adsorption. Nat. Chem. 5, 300–306 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwämmlein, J. N. et al. Origin of superior HOR/HER activity of bimetallic Pt-Ru catalysts in alkaline media identified via Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, H229–H239 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y. et al. Pt–Ru catalyzed hydrogen oxidation in alkaline media: oxophilic effect or electronic effect? Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 177–181 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, S. & Zhuang, Z. Investigating the influences of the adsorbed species on catalytic activity for hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline electrolyte. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5156–5163 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elbert, K. et al. Elucidating hydrogen oxidation/evolution kinetics in base and acid by enhanced activities at the optimized Pt shell thickness on the Ru core. ACS Catal. 5, 6764–6772 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ledezma-Yanez, I. et al. Interfacial water reorganization as a pH-dependent descriptor of the hydrogen evolution rate on platinum electrodes. Nat. Energy 2, 17031 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Intikhab, S. et al. Exploiting dynamic water structure and structural sensitivity for nanoscale electrocatalyst design. Nano Energy 64, 103963 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Briega-Martos, V., Ferre-Vilaplana, A., Herrero, E. & Feliu, J. M. Why the activity of the hydrogen oxidation reaction on platinum decreases as pH increases. Electrochim. Acta 354, 136620 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rebollar, L. et al. “Beyond adsorption” descriptors in hydrogen electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 10, 14747–14762 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rebollar, L. et al. On the relationship between potential of zero charge and solvent dynamics in the reversible hydrogen electrode. J. Catal. 398, 161–170 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, E. et al. Interfacial water shuffling the intermediates of hydrogen oxidation and evolution reactions in aqueous media. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 3064–3074 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Intikhab, S. et al. Caffeinated interfaces enhance alkaline hydrogen electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 10, 6798–6802 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheng, W., Gasteiger, H. A. & Shao-Horn, Y. Hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction kinetics on platinum: acid vs alkaline electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, B1529–B1536 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alei, M. & Wageman, W. E. 15N NMR shifts for imidazole and 1-methyl imidazole in CH2Cl2 relative to aqueous solution. Tetrahedron Lett. 20, 667–670 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zischang, J., Lee, J. J. & Suhm, M. A. Communication: where does the first water molecule go in imidazole? J. Chem. Phys. 135, 061102 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Osawa, M., Tsushima, M., Mogami, H., Samjeské, G. & Yamakata, A. Structure of water at the electrified platinum–water interface: a study by surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 4248–4256 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ataka, K.-i, Yotsuyanagi, T. & Osawa, M. Potential-dependent reorientation of water molecules at an electrode/electrolyte interface studied by surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 10664–10672 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao, Y., Zhu, S., Wang, H., Li, H. & Shao, M. A spectroscopic study on the nitrogen electrochemical reduction reaction on gold and platinum surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 1496–1501 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, C.-Y. et al. In situ probing electrified interfacial water structures at atomically flat surfaces. Nat. Mater. 18, 697–701 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Toney, M. F. et al. Voltage-dependent ordering of water molecules at an electrode–electrolyte interface. Nature 368, 444–446 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagy, G. & Heinzinger, K. A molecular dynamics study of water monolayers on charged platinum walls. J. Electroanal. Chem. 327, 25–30 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, S.-H. & Griffiths, P. R. Resolution enhancement of diffuse reflectance i.r. spectra of coals by Fourier self-deconvolution: 1. C–H stretching and bending modes. Fuel 64, 229–236 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lambert, D. K. Vibrational stark effect of adsorbates at electrochemical interfaces. Electrochim. Acta 41, 623–630 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Teliska, M., O’Grady, W. E. & Ramaker, D. E. Determination of H adsorption sites on Pt/C electrodes in HClO4 from Pt L23 X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 2333–2344 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roth, C. et al. Determination of O[H] and CO coverage and adsorption sites on PtRu electrodes in an operating PEM fuel cell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 14607–14615 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maniguet, S., Mathew, R. J. & Russell, A. E. EXAFS of carbon monoxide oxidation on supported Pt fuel cell electrocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 1998–2004 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carter, D. A., Pemberton, J. E. & Woelfel, K. J. Orientation of 1- and 2-methylimidazole on silver electrodes determined with surface-enhanced Raman scattering. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 9870–9880 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Papoian, G., Nørskov, J. K. & Hoffmann, R. A comparative theoretical study of the hydrogen, methyl, and ethyl chemisorption on the Pt(111) surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 4129–4144 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cheng, T., Wang, L., Merinov, B. V. & Goddard, W. A. Explanation of dramatic pH-dependence of hydrogen binding on noble metal electrode: greatly weakened water adsorption at high pH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 7787–7790 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Laio, A. & Parrinello, M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12562–12566 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marx, D., Tuckerman, M. E., Hutter, J. & Parrinello, M. The nature of the hydrated excess proton in water. Nature 397, 601–604 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tuckerman, M. E., Marx, D. & Parrinello, M. The nature and transport mechanism of hydrated hydroxide ions in aqueous solution. Nature 417, 925–929 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dunnington, B. D. & Schmidt, J. R. Generalization of natural bond orbital analysis to periodic systems: applications to solids and surfaces via plane-wave density functional theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1902–1911 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ogasawara, H. et al. Structure and bonding of water on Pt(111). Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 276102 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lam, Y.-C., Soudackov, A. V., Goldsmith, Z. K. & Hammes-Schiffer, S. Theory of proton discharge on metal electrodes: electronically adiabatic model. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 12335–12345 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Meng, S., Wang, E. G. & Gao, S. Water adsorption on metal surfaces: a general picture from density functional theory studies. Phys. Rev. B 69, 195404 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rebollar, L., Intikhab, S., Snyder, J. D. & Tang, M. H. Determining the viability of hydroxide-mediated bifunctional HER/HOR mechanisms through single-crystal voltammetry and microkinetic modeling. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, J3209–J3221 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Intikhab, S., Snyder, J. D. & Tang, M. H. Adsorbed hydroxide does not participate in the volmer step of alkaline hydrogen electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 7, 8314–8319 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, M. et al. Hydroxide diffuses slower than hydronium in water because its solvated structure inhibits correlated proton transfer. Nat. Chem. 10, 413–419 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Harris, R. K., Becker, E. D., De Menezes, S. M. C., Goodfellow, R. & Granger, P. NMR nomenclature. Nuclear spin properties and conventions for chemical shifts (IUPAC Recommendations 2001). Pure Appl. Chem. 73, 1795–1818 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01 (Wallingford CT, 2016).

  48. Adamo, C. & Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: the PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6170 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Woon, D. E. & Dunning, T. H. Jr. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. V. Core-valence basis sets for boron through neon. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4572–4585 (1995).

  51. Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B. & Cancès, E. The IEF version of the PCM solvation method: an overview of a new method addressed to study molecular solutes at the QM ab initio level. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 464, 211–226 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Dunnington, B. D., Schmidt, J. R., Dunnington, B. D. & Schmidt, J. R. Generalization of natural bond orbital analysis to periodic systems: applications to solids and surfaces via plane-wave density functional theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1902–1911 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shin, Y. K., Gai, L., Raman, S. & van Duin, A. C. T. Development of a ReaxFF reactive force field for the Pt–Ni alloy catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 8044–8055 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Aktulga, H. M., Fogarty, J. C., Pandit, S. A. & Grama, A. Y. Parallel reactive molecular dynamics: numerical methods and algorithmic techniques. Parallel Comput. 38, 245–259 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shuichi, N. Constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. Prog. Theor. Phys. 103, 1–46 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mathew, K., Sundararaman, R., Letchworth-Weaver, K., Arias, T. A. & Hennig, R. G. Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 084106 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Johnson, E. R. & Becke, A. D. A post-Hartree–Fock model of intermolecular interactions: inclusion of higher-order corrections. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 174104 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) grant N000141712608 (Q.J.). This research used beamline 7-BM (QAS) of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory Contract DE-SC0012704. Beamline operations were supported in part by the Synchrotron Catalysis Consortium Grant DE-SC0012335. W.A.G. acknowledges support by the Liquid Sunlight Alliance, which is supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Fuels from Sunlight Hub under award number DE-SC0021266. This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) for AIMD simulation, which is supported by the NSF grant number ACI-1548562. S.K. acknowledges support from the Resnick Sustainability Institute at Caltech.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qingying Jia

    Present address: Plug Power Inc, Concord, MA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Qiang Sun, Jason J. Guo, Nathalie Myrthil, Steven A. Lopez, Ian Kendrick, Sanjeev Mukerjee & Qingying Jia

  2. Center for Clean Hydrogen, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    Nicholas J. Oliveira & Yushan Yan

  3. Liquid Sunlight Alliance (LiSA) and Materials and Process Simulation Center (MSC), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Soonho Kwon & William A. Goddard III

  4. Center for Drug Discovery and Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Sergiy Tyukhtenko

  5. Barnett Institute for Chemical and Biological Analysis, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Jason J. Guo

  6. National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA

    Lu Ma & Steven N. Ehrlich

  7. School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

    Jingkun Li

Authors
  1. Qiang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas J. Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soonho Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergiy Tyukhtenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jason J. Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nathalie Myrthil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Steven A. Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ian Kendrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sanjeev Mukerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lu Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Steven N. Ehrlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jingkun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. William A. Goddard III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yushan Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Qingying Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Q.J. conceived the project, designed the experiments and proposed the HER/HOR mechanism. Q.S. conducted the electrochemical experiments and the data analysis in S.M.’s lab partly under his supervision. S.T. and J.J.G. conducted the NMR experiments and analysed the data. Q.S. helped to prepare the NMR samples. S.K. and W.A.G. planned the AIMD calculations. N.M. and S.A.L. performed the DFT calculations and contributed to the writing of the DFT computational results. Y.Y. and N.J.O. conducted the in situ ATR-SEIRAS and data analysis. Y.Y. and N.J.O. repeated electrochemical RDE experiments. Q.S., L.M. and S.N.E. conducted the XAS experiments, and Q.J. did the data analysis. J.L. conducted the in situ surface-enhanced Raman and data analysis. Q.S. and I.K. conducted the AEMEL testing and analysed the data. Q.J. supervised the project and data analysis. Q.J., Y.Y., W.A.G., Q.S., N.J.O. and S.K. wrote the paper and prepared the figures.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jingkun Li, William A. Goddard III, Yushan Yan or Qingying Jia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Batyr Garlyyev, Zhenhua Zeng and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–15, Tables 1–5, Notes 1–3 and References.

Supplementary Data 1

Raw data for the 60H2O-Pt configuration.

Supplementary Data 2

Raw data for the parallel Me-N1C2-57H2O-Pt configuration.

Supplementary Data 3

The deposition history of Gaussian potential with Me-N1C2.

Supplementary Data 4

The deposition history of Gaussian potential without Me-N1C2.

Supplementary Data 5

The time evolution of CV and potential energy landscape as a function of CV with Me-N1C2.

Supplementary Data 6

The time evolution of CV and potential energy landscape as a function of CV without Me-N1C2.

Supplementary Data 7

Raw data for Supplementary Fig. 15.

Supplementary Video 1

Video shows the movement of the hydroxide generated from HER absent of Me-N1C2.

Supplementary Video 2

Video shows the movement of the hydroxide generated from HER with the presence of Me-N1C2.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Input data in Excel for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2

Input data in Excel for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Input data in Excel for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4

Input data in Excel for Fig. 4.

Source Data Fig. 6

Input data in Excel for Fig. 6.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Q., Oliveira, N.J., Kwon, S. et al. Understanding hydrogen electrocatalysis by probing the hydrogen-bond network of water at the electrified Pt–solution interface. Nat Energy 8, 859–869 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01302-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01302-y

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing