Content Types

To submit one of the following content types, please read the formatting details below, then follow the submission guidelines:

  • Article
  • Analysis
  • Resource
  • Correspondence*
  • Review*
  • Perspective*
  • Comment*
  • Consensus Statement*
  • Matters Arising – see specialist submission process here.

For more information on these content types, please contact Nature Energy:

  • News & Views*    
  • Book Review*
  • Feature*
  • Policy Brief*

*These content types should not include original (previously unpublished) research findings and may only contain minimal new supporting data. As they are non-primary articles they are not eligible for Open Access and can only be published using the subscription-based publishing route.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Article

An Article is a substantial novel research study, with a complex story often involving several techniques or approaches. 

Format

  • Length – up to 3,000 words, excluding abstract, Methods, references and figure legends.
  • Abstract – up to 150 words, unreferenced. 
  • Display items – up to 8 items (figures and/or tables). 
  • Article should be divided as follows: 
    • Introduction (without heading) 
    • Main text
    • Discussion/Conclusions
    • Methods. ​
  • Main text and Methods should be divided by topical subheadings; the Discussion/Conclusions does not contain subheadings. 
  • References – as a guideline, we typically recommend up to 50.
  • Articles include received/accepted dates. 
  • Articles may be accompanied by supplementary information. 
  • Articles are peer reviewed.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Analysis

An Analysis is a new analysis of existing data or describes new data obtained in a comparative analysis that leads to novel and arresting conclusions of importance to a broad audience. 

Format

  • Length – up to 3,000 words (excluding abstract, online Methods, references and figure legends)
  • Abstract – 100-150 words, unreferenced. 
  • Display items – up to 8 items (figures and/or tables). 
  • Analyses should be divided as follows: 
    • Introduction (without heading) 
    • Main text
    • Discussion/Conclusions
    • Methods. ​
  • Main text and Methods should be divided by topical subheadings; the Discussion does not contain subheadings. 
  • References – as a guideline, we typically recommend up to 50.
  • Analyses include received/accepted dates. 
  • Analyses may be accompanied by supplementary information. 
  • Analyses are peer reviewed.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Resource

A Resource presents a large data set of broad utility, interest and significance to the community. 

Format

  • Length – up to 3,000 words (excluding abstract, online Methods, references and figure legends).
  • Abstract – 100-150 words, unreferenced. 
  • Display items – up to 8 items (figures and/or tables). 
  • Resources should be divided as follows: 
    • Introduction (without heading) 
    • Main text
    • Discussion/Conclusions
    • Methods. ​
  • Main text and Methods should be divided by topical subheadings; the Discussion does not contain subheadings. 
  • References – as a guideline, we typically recommend up to 50.
  • Resources include received/accepted dates. 
  • Resources may be accompanied by supplementary information. 
  • Resources are peer reviewed.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Correspondence

The Correspondence section provides a forum for comment on issues relevant to the journal’s community. This format may not be used for presentation of research data or analysis. 

Format

  • Length – between 300-800 words.
  • Display items – 1 item.
  • References – up to 10 references. Article titles are omitted from the reference list. 
  • Correspondence may be peer-reviewed at the editors’ discretion. 

Note that Correspondence pieces are not technical comments on peer-reviewed research papers; these should be submitted as Matters Arising.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Review

A Review is an authoritative, balanced and scholarly survey of recent developments in a research field. The requirement for balance need not prevent authors from proposing a specific viewpoint, but if there are controversies in the field, the authors must treat them in an even-handed way. 

The scope of a Review should be broad enough that it is not dominated by the work of a single laboratory, and particularly not by the authors' own work.

Format

  • Length – 6,000 words.
  • Illustrations are strongly encouraged.
  • Display items – up to 8 items (figures and/or tables). 
  • References – up to 100 (exceptions are possible in special cases). 
  • Citations – these should be selective and, in the case of particularly important studies (≤ 10% of all the references), we encourage authors to provide short annotations explaining why these are key contributions.
  • Reviews include received/accepted dates. 
  • Reviews are peer reviewed.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Perspective

A Perspective is intended to provide a forum for authors to discuss models and ideas from a personal viewpoint. They are more forward looking and/or speculative than Reviews and may take a narrower field of view. They may be opinionated but should remain balanced and are intended to stimulate discussion and new approaches. Perspectives may also advocate a controversial position or present a speculative hypothesis. Two articles advocating opposite sides in a research controversy are normally published as Perspectives. 

Format

  • Length – up to 3,000 words. 
  • Display items – up to 6 items (figures and/or tables). 
  • References – up to 50.
  • Perspectives include received/accepted dates.
  • Perspectives are peer reviewed.

 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Comment

A Comment is a flexible format, focusing on the scientific, commercial, ethical, legal, societal, or political issues surrounding research, or on other matters of policy, science and society related to energy. Comment articles should be topical, readable, provocative and introduce new concepts/points of view, providing a personal perspective on a matter of public or scientific importance. The main criteria are that they should be of immediate interest to a broad readership and should be written in an accessible, non-technical style. 

Format

  • Length – up to 2,000 words.
  • There are no specific structural guidelines.
  • Commentaries do not normally contain primary research data, although they may present 'sociological' data (funding trends, demographics, bibliographic data, etc.). 
  • References should be used sparingly – up to 15.
  • Article titles are omitted from the reference list.
  • Peer review is at the editors' discretion.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Consensus Statements

Consensus Statements provide a comprehensive analysis by a panel of experts of a scientific issue. The ideal Consensus Statement should synthesize a new set of procedures, recommendations or standards that the community will find useful and that will ideally stimulate further research, discussion or debate.

Format

  • Length – up to 6,000 words (excluding abstract, online Methods, references and figure legends).
  • Abstract – 100-150 words, unreferenced. 
  • Display items – up to 8 items (figures and/or tables). 
  • Consensus Statements should be divided as follows: 
    • Introduction (without heading) 
    • Main text
    • Discussion/Conclusions
    • Methods. ​
  • Main text and Methods should be divided by topical subheadings; the Discussion does not contain subheadings. 
  • References – as a guideline, we typically recommend up to 100.
  • Consensus Statements include received/accepted dates. 
  • Consensus Statements may be accompanied by supplementary information. 
  • Consensus Statements are peer reviewed.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Matters Arising

Matters Arising are exceptionally interesting and timely scientific comments and clarifications on original research papers published in Nature Energy. These comments should ideally be based on contemporary knowledge rather than subsequent scientific developments.

For detailed information on how to submit a Matters Arising, please follow instructions here.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

News & Views

News & Views articles inform readers about the latest advances in energy research, as reported in recently published papers or at scientific meetings. They may be linked to articles in , or they may focus on papers of exceptional significance that are published elsewhere. Unsolicited contributions will not normally be considered, although prospective authors are welcome to make proposals.

News & Views are not peer reviewed.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Book Review

Book Reviews are by prior arrangement only, although suggestions are welcome. Book reviews are not peer reviewed.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Feature

A Feature encompasses both the technical and commercial aspects of any topic relevant to our readership. This format is intended to complement the emerging scientific developments reported in the research section, and also to provide a forum for regulatory and business topics that would otherwise not be covered in the journal. 

Nature Energy welcomes ideas for future topics.

Format

  • Length – up to 3,000 words.
  • Use of tables and figures is strongly encouraged.
  • Written in a journalistic style, accessible to a wide range of non-specialist readers. 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Policy Brief

Policy Briefs are arranged by invitation only. They provide a summary of the policy implications of a paper published in Nature Energy for a policy audience.