Key Points
-
Substantial natural variation in DNA methylation patterns exists within many plant species. This variation can influence gene expression and plant traits.
-
Variation in DNA methylation can arise through a range of mechanisms and is often inherited in the progeny of plants.
-
Clonal propagation can lead to epigenetic alleles, which can be stably inherited by regenerated plants. This phenomenon has potential applications for agricultural species that are propagated through grafting or tissue culture.
-
New epigenome editing tools will generate opportunities for creating novel epiallelic variants by alteration of DNA methylation or other chromatin modifications. These tools can be used for crop improvement through epigenome engineering.
Abstract
Plant breeding has traditionally relied on combining the genetic diversity present within a species to develop combinations of alleles that provide desired traits. Epigenetic diversity may provide additional sources of variation within a species that could be captured or created for crop improvement. It will be important to understand the sources of epigenetic variation and the stability of newly formed epigenetic variants over generations to fully use the potential of epigenetic variation to improve crops. The development and application of methods for widespread epigenome profiling and engineering may generate new avenues for using the full potential of epigenetics in crop improvement.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nelson, G. C. et al. Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3274–3279 (2014).
Garnett, T. et al. Agriculture. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 33–34 (2013).
Wallace, J. G., Larsson, S. J. & Buckler, E. S. Entering the second century of maize quantitative genetics. Heredity (Edinb.) 112, 30–38 (2014).
Ma, X., Zhu, Q., Chen, Y. & Liu, Y. G. CRISPR/Cas9 platforms for genome editing in plants: developments and applications. Mol. Plant. 9, 961–974 (2016).
Heard, E. & Martienssen, R. A. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 157, 95–109 (2014).
Henikoff, S. & Greally, J. M. Epigenetics, cellular memory and gene regulation. Curr. Biol. 26, R644–R648 (2016).
Cuerda-Gil, D. & Slotkin, R. K. Non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nat. Plants 2, 16163 (2016).
Gutierrez, C., Desvoyes, B., Vergara, Z., Otero, S. & Sequeira-Mendes, J. Links of genome replication, transcriptional silencing and chromatin dynamics. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 34, 92–99 (2016).
Jiang, D. & Berger, F. Histone variants in plant transcriptional regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1860, 123–130 (2017).
Wendte, J. M. & Pikaard, C. S. The RNAs of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1860, 140–148 (2017).
Xiao, J., Lee, U. S. & Wagner, D. Tug of war: adding and removing histone lysine methylation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 34, 41–53 (2016).
Vidalis, A. et al. Methylome evolution in plants. Genome Biol. 17, 264 (2016).
Chen, X. & Zhou, D. X. Rice epigenomics and epigenetics: challenges and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16, 164–169 (2013).
Gaydos, L. J., Wang, W. & Strome, S. Gene repression. H3K27me and PRC2 transmit a memory of repression across generations and during development. Science 345, 1515–1518 (2014).
Law, J. A. & Jacobsen, S. E. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 204–220 (2010).
Stroud, H., Greenberg, M. V., Feng, S., Bernatavichute, Y. V. & Jacobsen, S. E. Comprehensive analysis of silencing mutants reveals complex regulation of the Arabidopsis methylome. Cell 152, 352–364 (2013). This detailed analysis reports the contribution of 86 different genes to the distribution of DNA methylation in A. thaliana.
Bostick, M. et al. UHRF1 plays a role in maintaining DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Science 317, 1760–1764 (2007).
Lindroth, A. M. et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science 292, 2077–2080 (2001).
Jackson, J. P., Lindroth, A. M., Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature 416, 556–560 (2002).
Gouil, Q. & Baulcombe, D. C. DNA methylation signatures of the plant chromomethyltransferases. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006526 (2016).
Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. Locus-specific control of asymmetric and CpNpG methylation by the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferase genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16491–16498 (2002).
Panda, K. et al. Full-length autonomous transposable elements are preferentially targeted by expression-dependent forms of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Genome Biol. 17, 170 (2016).
Nuthikattu, S. et al. The initiation of epigenetic silencing of active transposable elements is triggered by RDR6 and 21–22 nucleotide small interfering RNAs. Plant Physiol. 162, 116–131 (2013). This study documents the role of specific components in true de novo methylation in plants.
Bond, D. M. & Baulcombe, D. C. Epigenetic transitions leading to heritable, RNA-mediated de novo silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 917–922 (2015).
Wu, L., Mao, L. & Qi, Y. Roles of dicer-like and argonaute proteins in TAS-derived small interfering RNA-triggered DNA methylation. Plant Physiol. 160, 990–999 (2012).
Fultz, D. & Slotkin, R. K. Exogenous transposable elements circumvent identity-based silencing, permitting the dissection of expression-dependent silencing. Plant Cell 29, 360–376 (2017).
Zemach, A. et al. The Arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell 153, 193–205 (2013).
Stroud, H. et al. Non-CG methylation patterns shape the epigenetic landscape in Arabidopsis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 64–72 (2014).
Bewick, A. J. & Schmitz, R. J. Gene body DNA methylation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 36, 103–110 (2017).
Tran, R. K. et al. DNA methylation profiling identifies CG methylation clusters in Arabidopsis genes. Curr. Biol. 15, 154–159 (2005).
Niederhuth, C. E. et al. Widespread natural variation of DNA methylation within angiosperms. Genome Biol. 17, 194 (2016). This study is a detailed documentation of similarities and differences in methylome patterning in 34 plant species.
Takuno, S., Ran, J. H. & Gaut, B. S. Evolutionary patterns of genic DNA methylation vary across land plants. Nat. Plants 2, 15222 (2016).
Li, Q. et al. RNA-directed DNA methylation enforces boundaries between heterochromatin and euchromatin in the maize genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14728–14733 (2015).
Zhang, X. et al. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in arabidopsis. Cell 126, 1189–1201 (2006).
Bewick, A. J. et al. On the origin and evolutionary consequences of gene body DNA methylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9111–9116 (2016).
Takuno, S. & Gaut, B. S. Body-methylated genes in Arabidopsis thaliana are functionally important and evolve slowly. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 219–227 (2012).
Vaughn, M. W. et al. Epigenetic natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol. 5, e174 (2007).
Eichten, S. R. et al. Heritable epigenetic variation among maize inbreds. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002372 (2011).
Chodavarapu, R. K. et al. Transcriptome and methylome interactions in rice hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12040–12045 (2012).
Eichten, S. R. et al. Epigenetic and genetic influences on DNA methylation variation in maize populations. Plant Cell 25, 2783–2797 (2013).
Regulski, M. et al. The maize methylome influences mRNA splice sites and reveals widespread paramutation-like switches guided by small RNA. Genome Res. 23, 1651–1662 (2013).
Schmitz, R. J. et al. Epigenome-wide inheritance of cytosine methylation variants in a recombinant inbred population. Genome Res. 23, 1663–1674 (2013).
Schmitz, R. J. et al. Patterns of population epigenomic diversity. Nature 495, 193–198 (2013).
Li, Q. et al. Examining the causes and consequences of context-specific differential DNA methylation in maize. Plant Physiol. 168, 1262–1274 (2015).
Kawakatsu, T. et al. Epigenomic diversity in a global collection of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Cell 166, 492–505 (2016). This study is an in-depth characterization of DNA methylation variation in >1,000 A. thaliana accessions.
Eichten, S. R., Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Lister, R. & Borevitz, J. O. DNA methylation profiles of diverse Brachypodium distachyon align with underlying genetic diversity. Genome Res. 26, 1520–1531 (2016).
Garg, R., Narayana Chevala, V., Shankar, R. & Jain, M. Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with gene expression in rice cultivars with contrasting drought and salinity stress response. Sci. Rep. 5, 14922 (2015).
Shen, X. et al. Natural CMT2 variation is associated with genome-wide methylation changes and temperature seasonality. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004842 (2014).
Dubin, M. J. et al. DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has a genetic basis and shows evidence of local adaptation. eLife 4, e05255 (2015).
Pignatta, D. et al. Natural epigenetic polymorphisms lead to intraspecific variation in Arabidopsis gene imprinting. eLife 3, e03198 (2014).
Zhang, L. et al. A natural tandem array alleviates epigenetic repression of IPA1 and leads to superior yielding rice. Nat. Commun. 8, 14789 (2017).
Deng, Y. et al. Epigenetic regulation of antagonistic receptors confers rice blast resistance with yield balance. Science 355, 962–965 (2017).
Meng, D. et al. Limited contribution of DNA methylation variation to expression regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006141 (2016).
Cubas, P., Vincent, C. & Coen, E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401, 157–161 (1999).
Manning, K. et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38, 948–952 (2006).
Chandler, V. L. Paramutation: from maize to mice. Cell 128, 641–645 (2007).
Reinders, J. et al. Compromised stability of DNA methylation and transposon immobilization in mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes. Genes Dev. 23, 939–950 (2009).
Johannes, F. et al. Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000530 (2009). References 57 and 58 describe the creation and phenotypic characterization of the first epiRIL populations.
Cortijo, S. et al. Mapping the epigenetic basis of complex traits. Science 343, 1145–1148 (2014). This article clearly documents the potential role of epigenetic variation in influencing quantitative traits in plants.
Kooke, R. et al. Epigenetic basis of morphological variation and phenotypic plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 27, 337–348 (2015).
Zhang, Y. Y., Fischer, M., Colot, V. & Bossdorf, O. Epigenetic variation creates potential for evolution of plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol. 197, 314–322 (2013).
Dapp, M. et al. Heterosis and inbreeding depression of epigenetic Arabidopsis hybrids. Nat. Plants 1, 15092 (2015).
Hu, L. et al. Mutation of a major CG methylase in rice causes genome-wide hypomethylation, dysregulated genome expression, and seedling lethality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10642–10647 (2014).
Yamauchi, T., Johzuka-Hisatomi, Y., Terada, R., Nakamura, I. & Iida, S. The MET1b gene encoding a maintenance DNA methyltransferase is indispensable for normal development in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 85, 219–232 (2014).
Li, Q. et al. Genetic perturbation of the maize methylome. Plant Cell 26, 4602–4616 (2014).
Richards, E. J. Inherited epigenetic variation — revisiting soft inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 395–401 (2006).
Taudt, A., Colome-Tatche, M. & Johannes, F. Genetic sources of population epigenomic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 319–332 (2016).
Hollister, J. D. & Gaut, B. S. Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression. Genome Res. 19, 1419–1428 (2009).
Bender, J. & Fink, G. R. Epigenetic control of an endogenous gene family is revealed by a novel blue fluorescent mutant of Arabidopsis. Cell 83, 725–734 (1995).
Gehring, M., Bubb, K. L. & Henikoff, S. Extensive demethylation of repetitive elements during seed development underlies gene imprinting. Science 324, 1447–1451 (2009).
Hsieh, T. F. et al. Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 324, 1451–1454 (2009).
Zemach, A. et al. Local DNA hypomethylation activates genes in rice endosperm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18729–18734 (2010).
Slotkin, R. K. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming and small RNA silencing of transposable elements in pollen. Cell 136, 461–472 (2009).
Ibarra, C. A. et al. Active DNA demethylation in plant companion cells reinforces transposon methylation in gametes. Science 337, 1360–1364 (2012).
Park, K. et al. DNA demethylation is initiated in the central cells of Arabidopsis and rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 15138–15143 (2016).
Rodrigues, J. A. & Zilberman, D. Evolution and function of genomic imprinting in plants. Genes Dev. 29, 2517–2531 (2015).
Yuan, J. et al. Both maternally and paternally imprinted genes regulate seed development in rice. New Phytol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14510 (2017).
Costa, L. M. et al. Maternal control of nutrient allocation in plant seeds by genomic imprinting. Curr. Biol. 22, 160–165 (2012).
Calarco, J. P. et al. Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell 151, 194–205 (2012).
Hsieh, P. H. et al. Arabidopsis male sexual lineage exhibits more robust maintenance of CG methylation than somatic tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 15132–15137 (2016).
Liu, R. et al. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10804–10809 (2015).
Satge, C. et al. Reprogramming of DNA methylation is critical for nodule development in Medicago truncatula. Nat. Plants 2, 16166 (2016).
Kawakatsu, T. et al. Unique cell-type-specific patterns of DNA methylation in the root meristem. Nat. Plants 2, 16058 (2016). This dissection of cell type-specific methylation patterns in plants reveals mostly similar patterns, with the exception of columella cells.
Pecinka, A. & Mittelsten Scheid, O. Stress-induced chromatin changes: a critical view on their heritability. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 801–808 (2012).
Secco, D. et al. Stress induced gene expression drives transient DNA methylation changes at adjacent repetitive elements. eLife 4, e09343 (2015). This detailed analysis of methylome and transcriptome response to phosphate stress finds evidence for expression-induced changes in methylation in response to abiotic stress in rice.
Jiang, C. et al. Environmentally responsive genome-wide accumulation of de novo Arabidopsis thaliana mutations and epimutations. Genome Res. 24, 1821–1829 (2014).
Wibowo, A. et al. Hyperosmotic stress memory in Arabidopsis is mediated by distinct epigenetically labile sites in the genome and is restricted in the male germline by DNA glycosylase activity. eLife 5, e13546 (2016).
Kaeppler, S. M., Kaeppler, H. F. & Rhee, Y. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 43, 179–188 (2000).
Peschke, V. M., Phillips, R. L. & Gengenbach, B. G. Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture — derived maize plants. Science 238, 804–807 (1987).
Hirochika, H., Sugimoto, K., Otsuki, Y., Tsugawa, H. & Kanda, M. Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7783–7788 (1996).
Rhee, Y., Sekhon, R. S., Chopra, S. & Kaeppler, S. Tissue culture-induced novel epialleles of a Myb transcription factor encoded by pericarp color1 in maize. Genetics 186, 843–855 (2010).
Ong-Abdullah, M. et al. Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525, 533–537 (2015). This study reports the identification of epialleles induced in tissue culture in clonally propagated oil palms.
Tanurdzic, M. et al. Epigenomic consequences of immortalized plant cell suspension culture. PLoS Biol. 6, 2880–2895 (2008).
Stroud, H. et al. Plants regenerated from tissue culture contain stable epigenome changes in rice. eLife 2, e00354 (2013).
Stelpflug, S. C., Eichten, S. R., Hermanson, P. J., Springer, N. M. & Kaeppler, S. M. Consistent and heritable alterations of DNA methylation are induced by tissue culture in maize. Genetics 198, 209–218 (2014).
Eichten, S. R. & Springer, N. M. Minimal evidence for consistent changes in maize DNA methylation patterns following environmental stress. Front. Plant. Sci. 6, 308 (2015).
Song, Q. X. et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in soybean. Mol. Plant 6, 1961–1974 (2013).
Hagmann, J. et al. Century-scale methylome stability in a recently diverged Arabidopsis thaliana lineage. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004920 (2015).
Le, T. N. et al. DNA demethylases target promoter transposable elements to positively regulate stress responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 15, 458 (2014).
Hollick, J. B. Paramutation and related phenomena in diverse species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 5–23 (2017).
Greaves, I. K. et al. Twenty-four-nucleotide siRNAs produce heritable trans-chromosomal methylation in F1 Arabidopsis hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6895–E6902 (2016).
Greaves, I. K. et al. Trans chromosomal methylation in Arabidopsis hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3570–3575 (2012).
Zhang, Q. et al. Methylation interactions in Arabidopsis hybrids require RNA-directed DNA methylation and are influenced by genetic variation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4248–E4256 (2016).
Jordan, W. T. & Schmitz, R. J. The shocking consequences of hybrid epigenomes. Genome Biol. 17, 85 (2016).
Rigal, M. et al. Epigenome confrontation triggers immediate reprogramming of DNA methylation and transposon silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana F1 epihybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E2083–E2092 (2016). In this report, epihybrids between a wild-type parent and a hypomethylated parent reveal widespread redistribution of heterochromatin marks.
Lei, M. et al. Regulatory link between DNA methylation and active demethylation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3553–3557 (2015).
Williams, B. P., Pignatta, D., Henikoff, S. & Gehring, M. Methylation-sensitive expression of a DNA demethylase gene serves as an epigenetic rheostat. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005142 (2015).
Wendel, J. F., Jackson, S. A., Meyers, B. C. & Wing, R. A. Evolution of plant genome architecture. Genome Biol. 17, 37 (2016).
Zhang, J. et al. Autotetraploid rice methylome analysis reveals methylation variation of transposable elements and their effects on gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E7022–E7029 (2015). This study provides evidence for ploidy-induced changes in DNA methylation and gene expression in rice.
Edgar, P. P. et al. Subgenome dominance in an interspecific hybrid, synthetic allopolyploid, and a 140 year old naturally established neo-allopolyploid monkeyflower. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/094797 (2016).
Becker, C. et al. Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature 480, 245–249 (2011).
Schmitz, R. J. et al. Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants. Science 334, 369–373 (2011).
van der Graaf, A. et al. Rate, spectrum, and evolutionary dynamics of spontaneous epimutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6676–6681 (2015). This study is a careful dissection of the rates of spontaneous change in DNA methylation in plants.
Shaw, R. G., Byers, D. L. & Darmo, E. Spontaneous mutational effects on reproductive traits of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 155, 369–378 (2000).
Ossowski, S. et al. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 327, 92–94 (2010).
Zheng, X. et al. Transgenerational epimutations induced by multi-generation drought imposition mediate rice plant's adaptation to drought condition. Sci. Rep. 7, 39843 (2017).
Li, Q., Eichten, S. R., Hermanson, P. J. & Springer, N. M. Inheritance patterns and stability of DNA methylation variation in maize near-isogenic lines. Genetics 196, 667–676 (2014).
Eichten, S. R. et al. Spreading of heterochromatin is limited to specific families of maize retrotransposons. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003127 (2012).
Catoni, M. et al. DNA sequence properties that predict susceptibility to epiallelic switching. EMBO J. 36, 617–628 (2017).
Lewsey, M. G. et al. Mobile small RNAs regulate genome-wide DNA methylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E801–E810 (2016).
Melnyk, C. W., Molnar, A. & Baulcombe, D. C. Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA silencing signals. EMBO J. 30, 3553–3563 (2011).
Kasai, A., Bai, S., Hojo, H. & Harada, T. Epigenome editing of potato by grafting using transgenic tobacco as siRNA donor. PLoS ONE 11, e0161729 (2016).
Jaligot, E. et al. Epigenetic imbalance and the floral developmental abnormality of the in vitro-regenerated oil palm Elaeis guineensis. Ann. Bot. 108, 1453–1462 (2011).
Telias, A. et al. Apple skin patterning is associated with differential expression of MYB10. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 93 (2011).
Xu, J., Tanino, K. K. & Robinson, S. J. Stable epigenetic variants selected from an induced hypomethylated Fragaria vesca population. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1768 (2016).
Amabile, A. et al. Inheritable silencing of endogenous genes by hit-and-run targeted epigenetic editing. Cell 167, 219–232.e14 (2016).
Liu, X. S. et al. Editing DNA methylation in the mammalian genome. Cell 167, 233–247.e17 (2016).
Park, M., Keung, A. J. & Khalil, A. S. The epigenome: the next substrate for engineering. Genome Biol. 17, 183 (2016).
Bikard, D. et al. Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR–Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 7429–7437 (2013).
Johnson, L. M. et al. SRA- and SET-domain-containing proteins link RNA polymerase V occupancy to DNA methylation. Nature 507, 124–128 (2014). In this study, the authors use zinc finger endonucleases to direct de novo DNA methylation in A. thaliana.
Griffin, P. T., Niederhuth, C. E. & Schmitz, R. J. A. Comparative analysis of 5-azacytidine- and zebularine-induced DNA demethylation. G3 (Bethesda) 6, 2773–2780 (2016).
Waddington, C. H. Canalization of development and genetic assimilation of acquired characters. Nature 183, 1654–1655 (1959).
Wolff, P. et al. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis endosperm. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002126 (2011).
Zhang, M. et al. Genome-wide high resolution parental-specific DNA and histone methylation maps uncover patterns of imprinting regulation in maize. Genome Res. 24, 167–176 (2014).
Moreno-Romero, J., Jiang, H., Santos-Gonzalez, J. & Kohler, C. Parental epigenetic asymmetry of PRC2-mediated histone modifications in the Arabidopsis endosperm. EMBO J. 35, 1298–1311 (2016).
Probst, A. V. & Mittelsten Scheid, O. Stress-induced structural changes in plant chromatin. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 27, 8–16 (2015).
Chen, X., Liu, X., Zhao, Y. & Zhou, D. X. Histone H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 regulatory genes control stable transmission of an epimutation in rice. Sci. Rep. 5, 13251 (2015).
Guo, Z. et al. Global epigenomic analysis indicates that epialleles contribute to allele-specific expression via allele-specific histone modifications in hybrid rice. BMC Genomics 16, 232 (2015).
Song, X. J. et al. Rare allele of a previously unidentified histone H4 acetyltransferase enhances grain weight, yield, and plant biomass in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 76–81 (2015).
Jaskiewicz, M., Conrath, U. & Peterhansel, C. Chromatin modification acts as a memory for systemic acquired resistance in the plant stress response. EMBO Rep. 12, 50–55 (2011).
Ding, Y., Fromm, M. & Avramova, Z. Multiple exposures to drought 'train' transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 3, 740 (2012).
Sani, E., Herzyk, P., Perrella, G., Colot, V. & Amtmann, A. Hyperosmotic priming of Arabidopsis seedlings establishes a long-term somatic memory accompanied by specific changes of the epigenome. Genome Biol. 14, R59 (2013).
Du, J. et al. Dual binding of chromomethylase domains to H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes directs DNA methylation in plants. Cell 151, 167–180 (2012).
Deleris, A. et al. Loss of the DNA methyltransferase MET1 Induces H3K9 hypermethylation at PcG target genes and redistribution of H3K27 trimethylation to transposons in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003062 (2012). This study shows how loss of DNA methylation at some loci leads to transcriptional repression by the Polycomb complex.
Greenberg, M. V. et al. Interplay between active chromatin marks and RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003946 (2013).
Laprell, F., Finkl, K. & Muller, J. Propagation of Polycomb-repressed chromatin requires sequence-specific recruitment to DNA. Science 356, 85–88 (2017).
Wang, X. & Moazed, D. DNA sequence-dependent epigenetic inheritance of gene silencing and histone H3K9 methylation. Science 356, 88–91 (2017).
Zhang, L. et al. Identification and characterization of an epi-allele of FIE1 reveals a regulatory linkage between two epigenetic marks in rice. Plant Cell 24, 4407–4421 (2012).
Zabet, N. R., Catoni, M., Prischi, F. & Paszkowski, J. Cytosine methylation at CpCpG sites triggers accumulation of non-CpG methylation in gene bodies. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 3777–3784 (2017).
Du, J., Johnson, L. M., Jacobsen, S. E. & Patel, D. J. DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 519–532 (2015).
Bewick, A. J. et al. The evolution of CHROMOMETHYLASES and gene body DNA methylation in plants. Genome Biol. 18, 65 (2017).
West, P. T. et al. Genomic distribution of H3K9me2 and DNA methylation in a maize genome. PLoS ONE 9, e105267 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the vibrant community of epigenetic researchers and acknowledge that only a subset of critical works is cited in this article owing to space limitations. The authors are grateful to J. Noshay for assistance with figure preparation. C. Hirsch, S. Anderson and S. Eichten provided valuable feedback on the manuscript. The authors also appreciate the constructive feedback from several anonymous reviewers that helped to improve the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Glossary
- Traits
-
Any measurable aspect of an organism, including morphological, biochemical and molecular properties.
- Transgressive segregation
-
The situation in which offspring (F1, F2 or later generations) exhibit phenotypes that transgress (are outside of) the parental phenotypic range.
- Heritable variation
-
Information in the genome that is transmitted to offspring or daughter cells.
- Genomic selection
-
The use of genetic markers that are spread throughout the genome to select individuals with desired predicted breeding values.
- Paramutation
-
An interaction between alleles in which one alleles triggers a heritable change at the other allele, resulting in altered expression or chromatin state.
- Imprinting
-
Differential expression of alleles depending on parent-of-origin of the allele.
- Wide crosses
-
Crosses between very distantly related members of the same species or between individuals of related species.
- RNA-directed DNA methylation
-
(RdDM). The mechanism by which 24-nt small interfering RNAs can direct DNA methylation to specific genomic loci.
- Accessions
-
Individuals isolated from a single geographical area. An ecotype comprises many accessions from a similar ecological range.
- Differentially methylated regions
-
(DMRs). Genomic regions that have different levels of methylation between sample groups. Can be context specific (CG, CHG or CHH) or can refer to overall methylcytosine content.
- Epialleles
-
Chromatin differences at a locus between different individuals or cells. Note that an epiallele may be due to genetic differences (at cis-genomic or trans-genomic locations). Thus, some epialleles may reflect epigenetic variation but others may reflect genetic variation.
- Epigenetic recombinant inbred line
-
(epiRIL). A quasi-homozygous line that is almost identical at the genetic level but that segregates at the DNA methylation level. Produced from an initial cross between two individuals with few DNA sequence differences but with contrasting DNA methylation profiles, followed by 6–8 generations of self-pollination.
- Polyploidization
-
Whole-genome duplication events that can occur through the doubling of the chromosomes in a single species (autopolyploidization) or through a cross between related species followed by chromosome doubling (allopolyploidization).
- Linkage disequilibrium
-
A measure of whether alleles at two loci coexist in a population in a nonrandom manner. Alleles that are in linkage disequilibrium are found together on the same haplotype more often than would be expected under a random combination of alleles.
- Scions
-
Shoot or branch of a plant that is grafted to a rootstock.
- Grafting
-
The joining of living material from two individuals to generate a chimaera. In plants this generally is performed through grafting of a scion (a branch or bud) from one plant to a rootstock from another plant.
- Rootstock
-
The root system of a plant with the shoot removed onto which another variety is grafted.
- Epigenetic quantitative trait loci
-
(epiQTL). Epigenetic variants that are associated with a trait and that do not have any changes in the DNA sequence.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Springer, N., Schmitz, R. Exploiting induced and natural epigenetic variation for crop improvement. Nat Rev Genet 18, 563–575 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.45
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.45
This article is cited by
-
Genomics for monitoring and understanding species responses to global climate change
Nature Reviews Genetics (2024)
-
Epigenetics: Toward improving crop disease resistance and agronomic characteristics
Plant Biotechnology Reports (2024)
-
Epigenomics in stress tolerance of plants under the climate change
Molecular Biology Reports (2023)
-
Global epigenetic analysis revealed dynamic fluctuations in levels of DNA methylation and histone modifications in the calli of Fagopyrum with different capacity for morphogenesis
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (2023)
-
Long-Term Cultivation of Adaptable Cultivars in Different Agro-Climatic Zones Influences the Epigenetic Diversity of South African Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)
Sugar Tech (2023)