Soil biodiversity and human health

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
528,
Pages:
69–76
Date published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature15744
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

Soil biodiversity is increasingly recognized as providing benefits to human health because it can suppress disease-causing soil organisms and provide clean air, water and food. Poor land-management practices and environmental change are, however, affecting belowground communities globally, and the resulting declines in soil biodiversity reduce and impair these benefits. Importantly, current research indicates that soil biodiversity can be maintained and partially restored if managed sustainably. Promoting the ecological complexity and robustness of soil biodiversity through improved management practices represents an underutilized resource with the ability to improve human health.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Flow diagram illustrating the link between soil biodiversity and human health.
    Figure 1: Flow diagram illustrating the link between soil biodiversity and human health.

    Soil biodiversity is often negatively affected by the interaction between poor land management practices and drivers of climate change, both of which ultimately compromise ecosystem function and services that are essential for human health (control of pests and pathogens, production of nutritious food, cleansing water and reducing air pollution). Responses to reduced human health can in turn affect management decisions that govern land use and climate change.

  2. A conceptual framework illustrating how decisions on land use and management are linked to human health through the effect on soil biodiversity.
    Figure 2: A conceptual framework illustrating how decisions on land use and management are linked to human health through the effect on soil biodiversity.

    Soil biodiversity is strongly influenced by external drivers such as climate change and nitrogen deposition but also by land-use management. Land use such as agricultural intensification (left) can reduce the diversity and densities of beneficial organisms that control pests and pathogens, thereby negatively affecting the health of plants, animals and humans. Adopting less-intensive management practices (right) that enhance soil biodiversity can promote plant, animal and human health because the number of beneficial species will outweigh pests and pathogens. Moreover, soil biodiversity may help mitigate the impacts of external drivers of ecosystem functioning.

References

  1. Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505511 (2014)
  2. Fisher, F. S., Bultman, M. W., Johnson, S. M., Pappagianis, D. & Zaborsky, E. Coccidioides niches and habitat parameters in the southwestern United States: a matter of scale. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1111, 4772 (2007)
  3. Wall, D. H. et al. Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012)
  4. Wall, D. H. & Six, J. Give soils their due. Science 347, 695 (2015)
  5. Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015)
  6. Tsiafouli, M. A. et al. Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 973985 (2015).This study, encompassing four agricultural regions across Europe, showed that increasing land-use intensity reduced soil foodweb diversity, functional diversity and taxonomic diversity.
  7. Garrison, V. H. et al. African and Asian dust: from desert soils to coral reefs. Bioscience 53, 469480 (2003)
  8. Park, J. W. et al. Effects of ambient particulate matter on peak expiratory flow rates and respiratory symptoms of asthmatics during Asian dust periods in Korea. Respirology 10, 470476 (2005)
  9. Quinton, J. N., Govers, G., Van Oost, K. & Bardgett, R. D. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on biogeochemical cycling. Nature Geosci. 3, 311314 (2010)
  10. Schenker, M. Exposures and health effects from inorganic agricultural dusts. Environ. Health Perspect. 108, 661664 (2000)
  11. Dominati, E., Patterson, M. & Mackay, A. A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol. Econ. 69, 18581868 (2010)
  12. Thiele-Bruhn, S., Bloem, J., de Vries, F. T., Kalbitz, K. & Wagg, C. Linking soil biodiversity and agricultural soil management. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 4, 523528 (2012)
  13. Nielsen, U. N., Wall, D. H. & Six, J. Soil biodiversity and the environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40, 6390 (2015)
  14. World Health Organization and Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Connecting Global Priorities: Biodiversity and Human Health. A State of Knowledge Review https://www.cbd.int/health/SOK-biodiversity-en.pdf (WHO, 2015)
  15. Brevik, E. C. & Burgess, L. C. The 2012 fungal meningitis outbreak in the United States: connections between soils and human health. Soil Horizons 54, 14 (2013)
  16. Oliver, M. A. & Gregory, P. J. Soil, food security and human health: a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 66, 257276 (2015)
  17. Ling, L. L. et al. A new antibiotic kills pathogens without detectable resistance. Nature 517, 455459 (2015)
  18. Ferris, H. & Tuomisto, H. Unearthing the role of biological diversity in soil health. Soil Biol. Biochem. 85, 101109 (2015)
  19. Brevik, E. C. & Burgess, L. C. Soils and Human Health (CRC Press, 2012)
  20. Bultman, M. W., Fisher, F. S. & Pappagianis, D. in Essentials of Medical Geology (ed. O. Selinus) Ch. 20 (Springer, 2013)
  21. Pepper, I. L., Gerba, C. P., Newby, D. T. & Rice, C. W. Soil: a public health threat or savior? Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 416432 (2009)
  22. Brevik, E. C. & Sauer, T. J. The past, present, and future of soils and human health studies. Soil 1, 3546 (2015)
  23. Myers, S. S. & Patz, J. A. Emerging threats to human health from global environmental change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 223252 (2009)
  24. Berg, G., Eberl, L. & Hartmann, A. The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 16731685 (2005)
  25. Ganz, H. H. et al. Interactions between Bacillus anthracis and plants may promote anthrax transmission. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002903 (2014)
  26. Smith, K. L. et al. Bacillus anthracis diversity in Kruger National Park. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 37803784 (2000)
  27. Schär, F. et al. Strongyloides stercoralis: global distribution and risk factors. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002288 (2013)
  28. Khieu, V. et al. High prevalence and spatial distribution of Strongyloides stercoralis in rural Cambodia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002854 (2014)
  29. de Silva, N. R. et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: updating the global picture. Trends Parasitol. 19, 547551 (2003)
  30. Kay, A. B. Overview of “Allergy and allergic diseases: with a view to the future”. Br. Med. Bull. 56, 843864 (2000)
  31. Matricardi, P. M. & Bonini, S. High microbial turnover rate preventing atopy: a solution to inconsistencies impinging on the hygiene hypothesis? Clin. Exp. Allergy 30, 15061510 (2000)
  32. Rook, G. A. W. 99th Dahlem conference on infection, inflammation and chronic inflammatory disorders: Darwinian medicine and the 'hygiene' or 'old friends' hypothesis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 160, 7079 (2010)
  33. Hanski, I. et al. Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 83348339 (2012). This study provides evidence that people living near environmentally diverse areas had less propensity for allergies because of a greater diversity of commensal bacteria on their skin, most of which are also found in soil and vegetation.
  34. Haahtela, T. et al. The Finnish Allergy Programme 2008–2018—scientific rationale and practical implementation. Asia Pacific Allergy 2, 275279 (2012)
  35. Ruokolainen, L. et al. Green areas around homes reduce atopic sensitization in children. Allergy 70, 195202 (2015)
  36. Prichard, R. in Antimicrobial Drug Resistance (ed. Mayers, D. L.) 621628 (Springer, 2009)
  37. Corbett, C. J. et al. The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys. Parasites Vectors 7, 48 (2014)
  38. Epstein, L. Fifty years since Silent Spring. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 377402 (2014)
  39. Campos-Herrera, R., El-Borai, F. E. & Duncan, L. W.in Nematode Pathogenesis of Insects and Other Pests (ed. Campos-Herrera, R.) (Springer, 2015)
  40. Charles, L. et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Pasteuria penetrans by use of multiple genetic loci. J. Bacteriol. 187, 57005708 (2005)
  41. Gray, N. F. Ecology of nematophagous fungi: Panagrellus redivivus as the target organism. Plant Soil 73, 293297 (1983)
  42. Stirling, G. R. in Biological Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes: Building Coherence Between Microbial Ecology and Molecular Mechanisms (eds Davies, K. G. & Spiegel, Y.) 138 (Springer, 2011)
  43. Stirling, G. R. Biological Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes: Soil Ecosystem Management Sustainable Agriculture 2nd edn (CABI, 2014)
  44. Costa, S. R., Kerry, B. R., Bardgett, R. D. & Davies, K. G. Interactions between nematodes and their microbial enemies in coastal sand dunes. Oecologia 170, 10531066 (2012)
  45. Ferris, H. et al. Diversity and complexity complement apparent competition: nematode assemblages in banana plantations. Acta Oecol. 40, 1118 (2012)
  46. Sánchez-Moreno, S. & Ferris, H. Suppressive service of the soil food web: effects of environmental management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 119, 7587 (2007). This study showed that the prevalence of predator and omnivorous nematodes, which suppressed plant parasitic nematodes, was higher in soils with more complex foodwebs.
  47. Penton, C. R. et al. Fungal community structure in disease suppressive soils assessed by 28S LSU gene sequencing. PLoS ONE 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093893 (2014)
  48. Weller, D. M., Raaijmakers, J. M., Gardener, B. B. M. & Thomashow, L. S. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40, 309348 (2002)
  49. Johnson, P. T. J. et al. Species diversity reduces parasite infection through cross-generational effects on host abundance. Ecology 93, 5664 (2012)
  50. Johnson, P. T. J., Preston, D. L., Hoverman, J. T. & Richgels, K. L. D. Biodiversity decreases disease through predictable changes in host community competence. Nature 494, 230233 (2013). This laboratory and field study showed that a richer host diversity reduced transmission of a parasite (the trematode Ribeiroia ondatrae) and reduced amphibian disease.
  51. Keesing, F., Holt, R. D. & Ostfeld, R. S. Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecol. Lett. 9, 485498 (2006)
  52. Searle, C. L., Biga, L. M., Spatafora, J. W. & Blaustein, A. R. A dilution effect in the emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1632216326 (2011)
  53. Suzán, G. et al. Experimental evidence for reduced rodent diversity causing increased hantavirus prevalence. PLoS ONE 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005461 (2009)
  54. van Elsas, J. D. et al. Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11591164 (2012). Experimental results showed that in soils with greater microbial diversity invading bacteria have a lower survival rate.
  55. Andersen, D. C. Belowground herbivory in natural communities—a review emphasizing fossorial animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 62, 261286 (1987)
  56. Gehring, C. A., Wolf, J. E. & Theimer, T. C. Terrestrial vertebrates promote arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and inoculum potential in a rain forest soil. Ecol. Lett. 5, 540548 (2002)
  57. Bates, S. T. et al. Global biogeography of highly diverse protistan communities in soil. ISME J. 7, 652659 (2013)
  58. Wu, T., Ayres, E., Bardgett, R. D., Wall, D. H. & Garey, J. R. Molecular study of worldwide distribution and diversity of soil animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1772017725 (2011)
  59. Ramirez, K. S. et al. Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City's Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1988 (2014)
  60. Lauber, C. L., Ramirez, K. S., Aanderud, Z., Lennon, J. & Fierer, N. Temporal variability in soil microbial communities across land-use types. ISME J. 7, 16411650 (2013)
  61. Tedersoo, L. et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688 (2014). This analysis indicates that the distribution and species richness of fungi is mostly determined by climate and not related to plant diversity on a global scale, except for root-related ectomycorrizal fungi; biogeographical comparisons of continents indicate efficient dispersal mechanisms for fungi compared to larger organisms.
  62. van Groenigen, J. W. et al. Earthworms increase plant production: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06365 (2014)
  63. Evans, T. A., Dawes, T. Z., Ward, P. R. & Lo, N. Ants and termites increase crop yield in a dry climate. Nature Commun. 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1257 (2011)
  64. Bender, S. F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil biota enhance agricultural sustainability by improving crop yield, nutrient uptake and reducing nitrogen leaching losses. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 228239 (2015)
  65. de Vries, F. T. et al. Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1429614301 (2013)
  66. de Vries, F. T. et al. Land use alters the resistance and resilience of soil food webs to drought. Nature Clim. Change 2, 276280 (2012). This study compared nitrogen retention in extensive versus intensive grasslands and showed that species-rich extensively managed grasslands had greater soil nitrogen retention due to a higher fungal:bacterial abundance ratio compared to intensively managed grasslands.
  67. Wall, D. H., Bardgett, R. D. & Kelly, E. F. Biodiversity in the dark. Nature Geosci. 3, 297298 (2010)
  68. Rillig, M. C. & Mummey, D. L. Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytol. 171, 4153 (2006)
  69. Schulin, R., Khoshgoftarmanesh, A., Afyuni, M., Nowack, B. & Frossard, E. in Development and Uses of Biofortified Agricultural Products (eds Banuelos, G. S. & Lin, Z.-Q.) Ch. 6 (CRC Press, 2008)
  70. Rodriguez, R. J. et al. Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME J. 2, 404416 (2008)
  71. Brown, J. K. M. & Hovmøller, M. S. Epidemiology—aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science 297, 537541 (2002)
  72. Nkem, J. N. et al. Wind dispersal of soil invertebrates in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 29, 346352 (2006)
  73. Madden, N. M., Southard, R. J. & Mitchell, J. P. Conservation tillage reduces PM10 emissions in dairy forage rotations. Atmos. Environ. 42, 37953808 (2008)
  74. Sprigg, W. A. et al. Regional dust storm modeling for health services: the case of valley fever. Aeolian Res. 14, 5373 (2014)
  75. Nguyen, C. et al. Recent advances in our understanding of the environmental, epidemiological, immunological, and clinical dimensions of coccidioidomycosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26, 505525 (2013)
  76. Tabor, J. A., O'Rourke, M. K., Lebowitz, M. D. & Harris, R. B. Landscape-epidemiological study design to investigate an environmentally based disease. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 21, 197211 (2011)
  77. Frey, S. D., Elliott, E. T. & Paustian, K. Bacterial and fungal abundance and biomass in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems along two climatic gradients. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 573585 (1999)
  78. Six, J., Frey, S. D., Thiet, R. K. & Batten, K. M. Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70, 555569 (2006)
  79. Anderson, J. O., Thundiyil, J. G. & Stolbach, A. Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health. J. Med. Toxicol. 8, 166175 (2012). This review provides an analysis of the complexity of particulate matter air pollution and its effects on human health.
  80. Nordstrom, K. F. & Hotta, S. Wind erosion from cropland solutions in the USA: a review of problems, and prospects. Geoderma 121, 157167 (2004)
  81. Alavanja, M. C. R., Ross, M. K. & Bonner, M. R. Increased cancer burden among pesticide applicators and others due to pesticide exposure. CA Cancer J. Clin. 63, 120142 (2013)
  82. Frankenberger, W. T. & Arshad, M. Bioremediation of selenium-contaminated sediments and water. Biofactors 14, 241254 (2001)
  83. Abraham, J. & Silambarasan, S. Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos and its hydrolyzing metabolite 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol by Sphingobacterium sp JAS3. Process Biochem. 48, 15591564 (2013)
  84. Rayu, S., Karpouzas, D. G. & Singh, B. K. Emerging technologies in bioremediation: constraints and opportunities. Biodegradation 23, 917926 (2012)
  85. Bailey, R. T., Romero, E. C. & Gates, T. K. Assessing best management practices for remediation of selenium loading in groundwater to streams in an irrigated region. J. Hydrol. 521, 341359 (2015)
  86. Tiemann, L., Grandy, A., Atkinson, E., Marin-Spiotta, E. & McDaniel, M. Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agrosystem. Ecol. Lett. 18, 761771 (2015)
  87. Chauvat, M., Titsch, D., Zaytsev, A. S. & Wolters, V. Changes in soil faunal assemblages during conversion from pure to mixed forest stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 262, 317324 (2011)
  88. Cary, S. C. & Fierer, N. The importance of sample archiving in microbial ecology. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 12, 789790 (2014)
  89. Jeffery, S. & van der Putten, W. H. Soil-Borne Human Diseases 156, http://dx.doi.org/10.2788/37199 (Joint Research Centre Scientific and Technical Reports, European Commission, 2011)
  90. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/focussdgs.html (UN, 2014)

Download references

Author information

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • Diana H. Wall,
    • Uffe N. Nielsen &
    • Johan Six

Affiliations

  1. School of Global Environmental Sustainability and Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1036, USA

    • Diana H. Wall
  2. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Locked Bag 1797, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia

    • Uffe N. Nielsen
  3. Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH-Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland

    • Johan Six

Contributions

D.H.W., J.S. and U.N.N. contributed equally to the planning and writing of the manuscript.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Author details

Additional data