Abstract
Fatty acids are precursors of inflammatory oxylipins. In the context of COVID-19, an excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines is associated with disease severity. The objective was to investigate whether the baseline omega 3/omega 6 fatty acids ratio and the oxylipins were associated with inflammation and oxidative stress in unvaccinated patients with COVID-19, classified according to the severity of the disease during hospitalization. This Prospective population-based cohort study included 180 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The patients were classified into five groups according to the severity of their disease. Group 1 was the least severe and Group 5 was the most severe. Three specific types of fatty acids—eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and arachidonic acid (AA)—as well as their enzymatic and non-enzymatic oxylipins were determined using chromatography coupled mass spectrometry. There was no difference in the ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids between the groups (p = 0.276). However, the EPA/AA ratio was lower in Group 4 compared to Group 1 (p = 0.015). This finding was associated with an increase in both C-Reactive Protein (p < 0.001) and Interleukin-6 (p = 0.002). Furthermore, the concentration of F2-Isoprostanes was higher in Group 4 than in Group 1 (p = 0.009), while no significant changes were observed for other oxylipins among groups. Multivariate analysis did not present any standard of biomarkers, suggesting the high complexity of factors involved in the disease severity. Our hypothesis was confirmed in terms of EPA/AA ratio. A higher EPA/AA ratio upon hospital admission was found to be associated with lower concentration of C-Reactive Protein and Interleukin-6, leading to a better prognosis of hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients. Importantly, this beneficial outcome was achieved without any form of supplementation. The trial also provides important information that can be further applied to reduce the severity of infections associated with an uncontrolled synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04449718—01/06/2020. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04449718.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Since the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in 2020, it has been observed that while some patients only exhibited mild clinical symptoms or were even asymptomatic, others required treatment in intensive care units (ICUs)1,2,3,4,5. Furthermore, the prognosis of COVID-19 patients has been associated with a multitude of factors, with a high concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines being one of the main features in the adverse response, resulting in a poorer outcome and/or increased mortality5,6.
Viral ssRNA(+) in the cytoplasm induces stress in the endoplasmic reticulum, leading to the release of fatty acids that esterify the phospholipids in the cell membrane. These fatty acids can be substrates for oxidative reactions, giving rise to various oxylipins7. The type of oxylipin formed, whether pro- or anti-inflammatory, depends on the fatty acid precursor and the oxidative pathway involved. Generally, oxylipins derived from enzymatic and non-enzymatic oxidation of omega-6 fatty acids, such as arachidonic acid (AA), have been found to be more inflammatory compared to those derived from omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) like eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)6,8,9. On the other hand, EPA and DHA are more unsaturated than omega-6 fatty acids (n-6 FA), making them more susceptible to oxidation and potentially giving rise to other cytotoxic oxylipins10.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the baseline ratio of omega-3/omega-6 fatty acids is associated with the inflammation and oxidative stress in non-immunized patients with COVID-19, classified according to the severity of the disease during hospitalization.
Methods
Study design and cohort
In this prospective population-based cohort study, randomized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test or by serology assay (ELISA) to detect IgG against SARS-CoV-2 at hospital admission were recruited from the Clinical Hospital of the School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo and the Ibirapuera Field Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. Patients were enrolled in this multicenter study from June 5, 2020, to September 17, 2020. This study was included as an additional part of another research, thus following the same inclusion and exclusion criteria previously reported11 (Supplementary Fig. 1). One patient was excluded from the initial analysis because it was not possible to find the information about his discharge. All research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines/regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki). The patients provided written informed consent before participation according to the Ethics Committee of the Clinical Hospital of the School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo and the Ethics Committee of the Ibirapuera Field Hospital (CAAE 38237320.3.0000.0068). Approved on February 12, 2021. Blood samples were collected in a fasting condition at the admission to the hospital using venipuncture into EDTA Vacutainer® tubes. Plasma samples were kept at − 80 °C until the final analysis.
Patient stratification according to disease severity during hospitalization
This study was carried out during the first wave of COVID-19 (from June 5, 2020, to September 17, 2020). During this period, the main criteria for patients admission were: diagnosis of COVID-19 presenting respiratory rate greater than 24/min, saturation less than 93% while breathing room air, or risk factors for complications (e.g., heart disease, diabetes, systemic arterial hypertension, neoplasms, immunosuppression, pulmonary tuberculosis, obesity) followed by COVID-19 confirmation; while for patients discharge were no need for supplemental oxygen in the past 48 h, no fever in the past 72 h, and oxygen saturation greater than 93% without supplemental oxygen and without respiratory distress11. These criteria were similar to other hospital’s emergency department admissions during COVID-19 outbreak12,13. The criteria adopted to stratify patients according to disease severity were: length of hospital stay in days from the date of randomization until hospital discharge or death, need for supplemental oxygen, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, need for orotracheal intubation (OTI) in intensive care units (ICUs), and death. Based on these criteria, patients were stratified into five groups. Group 1 included patients hospitalized for less than the median, calculated as 5 days, without supplemental oxygen. Group 2 comprised those discharged until 5 days but received supplemental oxygen and/or non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Group 3 comprised patients who remained hospitalized for over a median (5 days) and needed supplemental oxygen and/or non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Finally, Group 4 included patients who were treated in intensive care units (ICUs) and received orotracheal intubation (OTI), while Group 5 was composed of patients who died during hospitalization. Thus, the severity of the disease increased from Group 1 to Group 5. The criteria deviated from the NIH-COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines14, since all patients under study were hospitalized. In actuality, the classification utilized in our research was suggested by physicians as the most accurate representation of the patients’ conditions.
Determination of oxylipins
Plasma (100 µL) was placed in a microcentrifuge tube containing 500 µL 25% methanol in water and internal standard mix (1 ng each deuterated oxylipin). The sample was vortexed and spun to pellet protein. The supernatant was then extracted on an Oasis MAX uElution plate (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) as follows. Sample wells were first washed in methanol (200 µL) followed by 25% methanol in water (200 µL). The sample was then loaded into the well and washed with 600 µL 25% methanol. Eicosanoids were eluted from the plate with 30 µL 2-propanol/acetonitrile (50/50, v/v) containing 5% formic acid into a 96-well elution plate containing 30 µL water in each well. Samples were analyzed on a Waters Xevo TQ-XS triple quadrupole mass spectrometer connected to a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC (Waters Corp., Milford, MA USA). Separation of analytes was obtained using an Acquity PFP column (2.1 × 100 mm) with mobile phase A being 0.01% formic acid in water and mobile phase B acetonitrile. Eicosanoids were separated using a gradient elution beginning with 30% B going to 95% B over 8 min at a flow rate of 0.250 mL/min. One analysis was carried out/patient and the concentration was expressed as ng/mL plasma.
Determination of the fatty acids profile
Plasma (50 µL) were transferred to test tubes containing 0.1 mg of tricosanoic acid methyl ester as internal standard (IS) (C23:0; Fluka 91478), 20 μL of a 0.5% butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) solution and 1 mL of a methanolic NaOH solution (0.5 M). Then, samples were placed in a boiling water bath for 5 min, followed by addition of 2 mL of boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3) and boiling for 5 min. After cooling, 1 mL of isooctane was added and the mixture was vigorously homogenized. Then, 5 mL of a saturated NaCl solution was added and the samples were gently homogenized and centrifuged at 3000×g for 3 min The organic phase was extracted, dried, re-suspended in 250 µL of hexane, and injected into a gas chromatography coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (GC–MS Agilent 7890A GC System, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, USA)15. Fatty acids were separated on a fused silica capillary column (J&W DB-23 Agilent Inc. Santa Clara, USA) with 60 m × 0.250 mm dimensions. Injection volume was 1 μL in the splitless mode and the GC inlet temperature was 250 °C. High-purity Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.3 mL/min. The oven temperature was programmed to rise from 80 to 175 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, followed by another gradient of 3 °C/min until 230 °C, which was maintained for 5 min. The transfer line temperature was 280 °C. All mass spectra were obtained by electron impact (70 eV), in the scan mode (40–500 m/z). Compounds were identified by comparing of the retention time of fatty acids in the samples with the retention time of standards (FAME 37 Component Mix Supelco 47885), and also based on a comparison of their mass spectra with those given in the spectral database of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). In case that no evident peak could be observed after integration, it was attribute zero as value. One analysis was carried out/patient and the ratio of the fatty acid/IS area was applied to calculate the percentage of each fatty acid.
Determination of malondialdehyde (MDA)
MDA concentration was determined by reverse phase HPLC16. Briefly, 50 µL of human plasma were mixed with 12.5 μL of 0.2% BHT and 6.25 μL of 10 N NaOH. The TBA–MDA conjugate derivative was injected in a Phenomenex reverse-phase C18 analytical column (250 mm × 4.6 mm; 5 mm; Phenomenex) with an LC8-D8 pre-column (Phenomenex AJ0-1287) coupled to a HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1200 Series). Samples were quantified by fluorometry at an excitation of 515 nm and emission of 553 nm. The HPLC pump delivered the isocratic mobile phase: 40% PBS (A) (10 mmol, pH 7.1) and 60% methanol (B) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The gradient applied was: 0–4 min, 40% of solvent A and 60% of solvent B; 4–6 min, 45% of solvent A and 55% of solvent B, and then, the initial conditions were reestablished after 5 min. A standard curve was prepared using 1,1,3,3-Tetraethoxypropane (TEP, T9889 Sigma-Aldrich) (0.10 to 19.97 μmol/L MDA). One analysis was carried out/patient and the concentration was expressed as µmol/L plasma.
Statistical analysis
According to our hypothesis, the concentration of the most important oxylipin prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was chosen for the sample size calculation. Thus, in this context, a sample size of 180 patients was estimated to be enough to have 90% power to detect a difference of 10%, considering a 2-sided alpha of 0.05, based on PGE2 mean and deviation reported in the other study17. Two statistical approaches were applied to treat these data. Firstly, the characteristics and biomarkers were compared between the five groups using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey test when the values presented a normal distribution (Anderson–Darling test) and homogeneity of variances (Hartley test). Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by controlled comparisons using Bonferroni analysis when the normality and homogeneity assumptions were not verified. For variable “EPA/AA ratio”, Group 5 data was excluded from the statistical analysis, because zero was attributed as value. The analysis of this variable was also adjusted to sex, age and time since diagnosis using gamma distribution. In the second approach, a multivariate analysis was employed as an exploratory tool to identify standards-based characteristics associated with the disease’s severity. From the original continuous variables, 22 were selected to be included as active variables in the multivariate analysis. The criteria applied to this selection was to change according to the five groups. The principal component analysis (PCA) was based on correlation. Adopting Ward’s method and Euclidean distance, cluster analysis was carried out to group variables and patients. The significance was set at a p-value of 0.05. Analyses and graphs were performed using Statistica v. 13.4 (TIBCO Software Inc, Round Rode, Texas, USA), GraphPad Prism 9.0 and R v. 4.0.4 (R Development Core Team, 2021).
Results
Population
The general patient characteristics at hospital admission (Table 1) showed a wide range of age and BMI. The biomarkers determined in the patients at hospital admission are shown in Table 2. Furthermore, the oxidative stress biomarkers indicated large variability between the patients. Drugs prescribed to less than 5% of the patients during the hospital stay were described in Supplementary Table 1.
Biomarkers according to disease severity during hospitalization
Anthropometric data, immune cells, oxylipins and cytokines concentration, and fatty acids proportion determined in the patient’s plasma classified according to the five groups are shown in Table 3. From these values, the most relevant results associated with our hypothesis that showed different values between Groups 4 and/or 5 and Groups 1, 2, and 3 are presented in Fig. 1. Although no difference has been observed to the n-3FA/n-6FA ratio among the groups (p = 0.276), the EPA/AA ratio decreased from Group 1 to Group 4 (p = 0.015; Fig. 1A). The EPA/AA ratio was adjusted for sex, age and time since diagnosis, being just this later factor associated to the severity of the disease (p = 0.025) (Supplementary Table 2). Subsequently, this result was followed by two inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients: C-reactive protein (Fig. 1B) and Interleukin-6 (Fig. 1C). Concerning F2-Isop concentration, Group 4 had higher values in comparison to Group 1 (Fig. 1D). All these biomarkers showed correlation with the severity of the disease.
Biomarkers according to the cluster analysis
A multivariate analysis that considered 22 biomarkers was performed using another statistical approach. The original matrix was standardized according to the mean and deviation and applied to the cluster analysis using Ward’s method and Euclidean distance. Figure 2 shows the patients’ heatmap. All levels of severity were distributed among the clusters, suggesting that there was no standard of reclassification of the patients. This result was confirmed through a discriminant analysis (Supplementary Table 3), in which the rate of success of the patient’s classification based on the 10 major PCs was only 42.80%.
Discussion
Initially, the general characteristics of the patients, as shown in Table 1, were consistent with the majority of data concerning other SARS-CoV-2 patients hospitalized in 2020, considering that no vaccines were viable, and drugs were administered only to alleviate the symptoms and avoid other infections5,7,18,19. However, the BMI of Group 5 was unexpected, as the most severe conditions were typically associated with overweight and obesity20. In this regard, the intense catabolic state induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection results in significant body weight loss, primarily characterized by a reduction in lean mass. Consequently, it becomes feasible to contemplate a higher prevalence of sarcopenia among patients in Group 5.
The primary challenge in this study was to detect a difference in the n-3 FA/n-6 FA ratio among the patients, given the known the low n-3 FA supplements or fish consumption in the Western diet21. Thus, the difference observed in the EPA concentration could have been due to the endogenous conversion from α-linolenic acid (ALA), which was also low3,22. Although the cellular incorporation of EPA and DHA occurs mainly at the expense of AA23, this replacement seems to depend on the fatty acid pool24. This could explain the absence of any observed changes in the AA proportion among the patients (p = 0.664), especially considering the absence of any n-3 FA supplementation. DHA is known to exhibit a higher plasma concentration than EPA25, but its variability is lower compared to EPA9 due to the process involving the transfer of EPA to peroxisomes, where it undergoes β-oxidation to form DHA26. Furthermore, DHA undergoes rapid incorporation into phospholipids and cholesterol esterification27.
The main hypothesis of this study is summarized in Fig. 3. It is supposed that after SARS-CoV-2 infection, the innate immune system cells promote the synthesis of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and adhesion molecules, trying to counteract virus replication and spreadability. In addition, PLA2, among other hydrolases, releases fatty acids from the phospholipid chain to be used as a substrate for oxidant enzymes, such as lipoxygenases (LOX), cyclooxygenases (COX), and cytochrome P450 (CytP450), leading to the formation of many oxylipins involved in the immune response and the resolution of inflammation26,28. It has been reported that EPA- and DHA-derived oxylipins have a less potent inflammatory action than AA-derived oxylipins26. For example, PGE2 formed from AA (Fig. 3) has been associated with increased cytokine expression, although this effect depends on several other conditions9.
Our results clearly showed that a lower EPA/AA ratio, mainly observed in Groups 4–5 (Fig. 1A), was associated with a higher concentration of IL-6 and CRP, typically elevated in critically ill COVID-19 patients4,6,29,30, bringing a worse prognostic to these patients. In a retrospective pilot study31, it was observed an increase in maresin (MaR2) in severe COVID-19 disease versus not only healthy donors, but also versus all other less severe COVID-19 groups. On the other hand, although increased resolvin (RvD5) levels were found in moderate to severe groups versus non-affected individuals, it was not possible to identify patients with a mild course of the disease by SPM analysis. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials enrolling 1239 patients, Lu et al.32 concluded that Omega-3 supplementation compared to no supplementation or placebo had no effect on mortality, but significantly reduced ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation of the patients. Other studies carried out on patients with sepsis or multiple inflammatory and respiratory problems have shown a reduction of CRP and IL-6 concentrations after n-3 FA supplementation29. Diverging from our hypothesis, our data suggested that this beneficial effect was not associated with changes in PGE2 concentration.
PGE2 is an immunomodulatory eicosanoid generated by COX that crosstalks with cytokines through several mechanisms33. PGE2 increases arterial dilation and microvascular permeability, increasing the blood flow into inflamed tissue and regulating cytokine expression in immune cells, such as IL-69,34. It has been reported that during influenza-A virus infection, PGE2 was upregulated, leading to inhibition of type I interferon production, and suppressing apoptosis through EP2 and EP4 receptors, causing an increase in virus replication33,35. PGE2 activates the Nuclear factor-kappa B (NFκB) in macrophages synergistically with TNFα through EP2 receptors, thereby inducing the expression of pro-inflammatory genes that codify COX-2 and Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1)33,36. It has been proposed that lowering PGE2 concentrations by inhibiting Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) could enhance the host immune response against SARS-CoV-237. Our clinical trial did not identify any difference in PGE2 concentrations among groups with varying disease severity. Thus, it is possible that a higher EPA and DHA concentration is necessary to change plasma PGE2 concentrations. Moreover, PGE2 in plasma is rapidly metabolized and excreted in the urine as 11-α-hydroxy-9,15-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetranor-prostane-1,20-dioic acid. Consequently, urine PGE2 may better reflect its synthesis from AA than PGE2 in plasma38,39.
A reduction of an important marker of non-enzymatic lipid peroxidation, F2-IsoPs (Fig. 1D), was observed in Group 1 compared with Group 4. In another study, urinary 15-F2r-IsoPs was found lower in older subjects hospitalized for COVID-19 who were receiving daily IV infusions containing about 6 g EPA + DHA/day for 5 days, leading to the conclusion that n3-FA treatment promoted the reduction of oxidative stress in COVID-197. The high amount of F2-IsoPs observed in Group 4 compared with Group 1 can also be due to the enhanced secretion of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the immune cells30, since n-3 FA-derived specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) can blunt ROS production from neutrophils29.
EPA, DHA, and their oxylipins formed by enzymatic and non-enzymatic oxidative reactions can exert an anti-inflammatory effect through other mechanisms not thoroughly investigated in our study29, given that our focus was on PGE2. Actually, the fact that n-3 FA derived SPMs and other oxylipins were not detected in our analysis, does not discard the “resolution hypothesis”6, based on the association between SPMs derived from n-3 FA and the severity of COVID-1940, considering that SPMs blunt polymorphonuclear cells infiltration41 and have an essential role in efferocytosis improvement, reducing the massive infiltration of necrotic cell debris observed post-mortem in the lungs of deceased COVID-19 patients42. In addition, viral-induced cell debris causes endoplasmic reticulum stress, intensifying the inflammatory cycle43 and emphasizing the role of efferocytosis by macrophages in reducing the cytokine storm. Moreover, deficient concentrations of SPMs have been identified in the setting of common human inflammatory lung diseases25. The efficacy of dexamethasone in COVID-19 could be partly due to its ability to induce pro-resolving lipid mediators44.
As summarized in Fig. 3, EPA may act as a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) agonist, inhibiting NFκB translocation to the nucleus, leading to a lower expression of genes that codify the pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-6. It has been reported that the inhibition of NFκB reduces inflammation and increases the survival of mice infected with Sars-CoV45. Thus, if n-3 FA can inhibit NFκB translocation, as postulated by other study23 it can be suggested that the lower concentration of CRP and IL-6 is a result of NFκB inhibition promoted by n-3 FA (Fig. 3).
Clinical and routine laboratory data at hospital admission were applied to build an algorithm that could predict non-worsening patients during the first two weeks, showing a success rate higher than 99%5. However, a multivariate analysis applied to our data showed that no standard of biomarkers could be identified to predict the severity of the disease (Fig. 2), achieving a success rate of classification of only 43%, suggesting the complexity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in terms of factors associated with the disease prognostic in the conditions evaluated in our study.
The immune response demands the inflammatory condition to control the viral infection. That is, inflammation is an essential tool of the immune cells46. EPA and DHA do not primarily act as immune suppressors23. Instead, EPA and DHA selectively stimulate the pro-resolving cytokines. Omega-3 fatty acids and anti-inflammatory drugs can show different results according to the moment of their intake. While most studies have supplemented patients during treatment in the hospital, in our study, this protection was present at the time of infection, since blood samples were collected at the hospital admission and no intervention with n-3 FA was made during hospitalization. This aspect can be essential in infection control and must be further investigated to achieve a better protection against future infections.
Finally, our study has some limitations. Other factors, such as the initial charge of viral infection, could have contributed to the severity of the disease. Due to the low amount of sample and their rapid metabolism in plasma, some oxylipins were below the detection limit. As all patients were hospitalized, no comparison was made with patients who were not treated in the hospitals. In addition, we had not information about the use of NSAIDs before the hospitalization. It is worth noting that a higher EPA/AA can also be associated with other factors, including a more diverse and healthy diet47, indirectly contributing to a better prognosis of patients during hospitalization. For these reasons, extensive research is needed to confirm our results.
Conclusion
A higher EPA/AA ratio prior to infection was found to be associated with lower concentration of C-Reactive Protein and interleukin-6, leading to a better prognosis of hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients. However, the physiological mechanism of this effect must be further investigated, since a higher EPA/AA ratio was not associated to a lower concentration of oxylipins derived from enzymatic oxidation, as PGE2, but rather to a lower concentration F2-IsoP formed through non-enzymatic oxidation.
Data availability
Data described in the manuscript, code book, and analytic code will be made available upon request. Requests for data of the study can be sent to Profa. Inar Castro Erger, Department of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil (email: inar @usp.br).
References
World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1 (Accessed 25 September 2023) (2023).
Groß, S., Jahn, C., Cushman, S., Bär, C. & Thum, T. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2-dependent implications on the cardiovascular system: From basic science to clinical implications. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 144, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.04.031 (2020).
Hathaway, D. et al. Omega 3 fatty acids and COVID-19: A comprehensive review. Infect. Chemother. 52(4), 478–495. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2020.52.4.478 (2020).
Kircheis, R. et al. NF-κB Pathway as a potential target for treatment of critical stage COVID-19 patients. Front. Immunol. 11, 598444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.598444 (2020).
King, P. et al. Correction: Longitudinal metagenomic analysis of hospital air identifies clinically relevant microbes. PLoS ONE 11(12), e0169376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169376 (2016). Erratum for: PLoS ONE 11(8), e0160124 (2016).
Arnardottir, H. et al. Stimulating the resolution of inflammation through omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in COVID-19: Rationale for the COVID-omega-F trial. Front. Physiol. 11, 624657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.624657 (2020).
Pawelzik, S. C. et al. Decreased oxidative stress and altered urinary oxylipidome by intravenous omega-3 fatty acid emulsion in a randomized controlled trial of older subjects hospitalized for COVID-19. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 194, 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.12.006 (2023).
Calder, P. C. Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: From molecules to man. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 45(5), 1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20160474 (2017).
Nelson, J. R. & Raskin, S. The eicosapentaenoic acid: Arachidonic acid ratio and its clinical utility in cardiovascular disease. Postgrad. Med. 131(4), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2019.1607414 (2019).
Rogero, M. M. et al. Potential benefits and risks of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation to patients with COVID-19. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 156, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.07.005 (2020).
Murai, I. H. et al. Effect of a single high dose of vitamin D3 on hospital length of stay in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325(11), 1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26848 (2021).
Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine. Infectious Diseases. Clinical Algorithms for Admission and Discharge (2024).
Greysen, S. R. et al. Discharge practices for COVID-19 patients: Rapid review of published guidance and synthesis of documents and practices at 22 US Academic Medical Centers. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 36(6), 1715–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06711-x (2021).
NIH. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/ (Accessed 25 September 2023) (National Institutes of Health).
Shirai, N., Suzuki, H. & Wada, S. Direct methylation from mouse plasma and from liver and brain homogenates. Anal. Biochem. 343, 48–53 (2005).
Hong, Y. L., Yeh, S. L., Chang, C. Y. & Hu, M. L. Total plasma malondialdehyde levels in 16 Taiwanese college students determined by various thiobarbituric acid tests and an improved high-performance liquid chromatography-based method. Clin. Biochem. 33(8), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9120(00)00177-6 (2000).
Araujo, P., Mengesha, Z., Lucena, E. & Grung, B. Development and validation of an extraction method for the determination of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids in human plasma using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1353, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.10.082 (2014).
Chen, T. et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: Retrospective study. BMJ 368, m1091. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1091 (2020).
Tu, W. J., Cao, J., Yu, L., Hu, X. & Liu, Q. Clinicolaboratory study of 25 fatal cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan. Intens. Care Med. 46(6), 1117–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06023-4 (2020).
Kuehn, B. M. More severe obesity leads to more severe COVID-19 in study. JAMA 325(16), 1603. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4853 (2021).
Simopoulos, A. P. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed. Pharmacother. 56(8), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0753-3322(02)00253-6 (2002).
Burdge, G. C. & Calder, P. C. Conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to longer-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human adults. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 45(5), 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005047 (2005).
Jaudszus, A. et al. Evaluation of suppressive and pro-resolving effects of EPA and DHA in human primary monocytes and T-helper cells. J. Lipid Res. 54(4), 923–935. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.P031260 (2013).
Walker, C. G. et al. The pattern of fatty acids displaced by EPA and DHA following 12 months supplementation varies between blood cell and plasma fractions. Nutrients 7(8), 6281–6293. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7085285 (2015).
Duvall, M. G. & Levy, B. D. DHA- and EPA-derived resolvins, protectins, and maresins in airway inflammation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 785, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.11.001 (2016).
Dyall, S. C. et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and fatty acid-derived lipid mediators: Recent advances in the understanding of their biosynthesis, structures, and functions. Prog. Lipid Res. 86, 101165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2022.101165 (2022).
Oh, D. Y. et al. GPR120 is an omega-3 fatty acid receptor mediating potent anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing effects. Cell 142(5), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.041 (2010).
Biagini, D. et al. MS-based targeted profiling of oxylipins in COVID-19: A new insight into inflammation regulation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 180, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.01.021 (2022).
Darwesh, A. M., Bassiouni, W., Sosnowski, D. K. & Seubert, J. M. Can N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids be considered a potential adjuvant therapy for COVID-19-associated cardiovascular complications? Pharmacol. Ther. 219, 107703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107703 (2021).
Tay, M. Z., Poh, C. M., Rénia, L., MacAry, P. A. & Ng, L. F. P. The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20(6), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0311-8 (2020).
Irún, P. et al. Serum lipid mediator profiles in COVID-19 patients and lung disease severity: A pilot study. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 6497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33682-2 (2023).
Lu, C. et al. Omega-3 supplementation in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann. Intens. Care 7(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0282-5 (2017).
Yao, C. & Narumiya, S. Prostaglandin-cytokine crosstalk in chronic inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 176(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14530 (2019).
Sander, W. J., O’Neill, H. G. & Pohl, C. H. Prostaglandin E2 as a modulator of viral infections. Front. Physiol. 8, 89. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00089 (2017).
Coulombe, F. et al. Targeted prostaglandin E2 inhibition enhances antiviral immunity through induction of type I interferon and apoptosis in macrophages. Immunity 40(4), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.02.013 (2014).
Smeitink, J. J. X., Pecheritsyna, S., Renkema, H., van Maanen, R. & Beyrath, J. Hypothesis: mPGES-1-derived prostaglandin E2, a so far missing link in COVID-19 pathophysiology? Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202004.0180.v1 (2020).
Hoxha, M. What about COVID-19 and arachidonic acid pathway? Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 76, 1501–1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02941-w (2020).
Gross, N. D. et al. Levels of prostaglandin E metabolite, the major urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2, are increased in smokers. Clin. Cancer Res. 11(16), 6087–6093. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0733 (2005).
Murphey, L. J. et al. Quantification of the major urinary metabolite of PGE2 by a liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric assay: Determination of cyclooxygenase-specific PGE2 synthesis in healthy humans and those with lung cancer. Anal. Biochem. 334(2), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2004.08.019 (2004).
Schwarz, B. et al. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans is defined by a shift in the serum lipidome resulting in dysregulation of eicosanoid immune mediators. Res. Sq. 3, 42999. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-42999/v1 (2020).
Spite, M., Clària, J. & Serhan, C. N. Resolvins, specialized proresolving lipid mediators, and their potential roles in metabolic diseases. Cell Metab. 19(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.10.006 (2014).
Li, S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 triggers inflammatory responses and cell death through caspase-8 activation. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 5(1), 235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00334-0 (2020).
Hammock, B. D., Wang, W., Gilligan, M. M. & Panigrahy, D. Eicosanoids: The overlooked storm in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Am. J. Pathol. 190(9), 1782–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.06.010 (2020).
Andreakos, E., Papadaki, M. & Serhan, C. N. Dexamethasone, pro-resolving lipid mediators and resolution of inflammation in COVID-19. Allergy 76(3), 626–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14595 (2021).
DeDiego, M. L. et al. Inhibition of NF-κB-mediated inflammation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected mice increases survival. J. Virol. 88(2), 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02576-13 (2014).
Feehan, K. T. & Gilroy, D. W. Is resolution the end of inflammation? Trends Mol. Med. 25(3), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.01.006 (2019).
Mantzioris, E., Muhlhausler, B. S. & Villani, A. Impact of the mediterranean dietary pattern on n-3 fatty acid tissue levels—A systematic review. Prostagland. Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 176, 102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2021.102387 (2022).
Liu, T., Zhang, L., Joo, D. & Sun, S. C. NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2, 17023 (2017).
Funding
This project was funded by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; Grant 20/05752-4 and 20/10414-0). Ligia P Fernandes and Igor H. Murai reported receiving scholarships from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES (Grant 88887.597655/2021-00) and FAPESP (19/24782-4), respectively. Dr Pereira reported receiving grants from FAPESP (Grant 20/05752-4) and grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Grant 305556/2017-7) during the study. Marcelo M Rogero and Bruno Gualano received Grant from FAPESP (13/07914-8). The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LPF carried out the chromatography and wrote the manuscript. IHM, ALF and LPS contributed equally to collect the samples of the infected patients and organized the clinical data. MMR and BG contributed to discuss the results and edit the manuscript. LPB supported the statistical analysis. GLM was responsible for the oxylipins determination. RMRP was responsible for the supervision of the trial. IAC led the funding acquisition, methodology supervision, project administration, and contributed to the conceptualization, statistical analysis and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandes, L.P., Murai, I.H., Fernandes, A.L. et al. The severity of COVID-19 upon hospital admission is associated with plasma omega-3 fatty acids. Sci Rep 14, 10238 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60815-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60815-y
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.