Abstract
Progressive habitat fragmentation threatens plant species with narrow habitat requirements. While local environmental conditions define population growth rates and recruitment success at the patch level, dispersal is critical for population viability at the landscape scale. Identifying the dynamics of plant meta-populations is often confounded by the uncertainty about soil-stored population compartments. We combined a landscape-scale assessment of an amphibious plant’s population structure with measurements of dispersal complexity in time to track dispersal and putative shifts in functional connectivity. Using 13 microsatellite markers, we analyzed the genetic structure of extant Oenanthe aquatica populations and their soil seed banks in a kettle hole system to uncover hidden connectivity among populations in time and space. Considerable spatial genetic structure and isolation-by-distance suggest limited gene flow between sites. Spatial isolation and patch size showed minor effects on genetic diversity. Genetic similarity found among extant populations and their seed banks suggests increased local recruitment, despite some evidence of migration and recent colonization. Results indicate stepping-stone dispersal across adjacent populations. Among permanent and ephemeral demes the resulting meta-population demography could be determined by source-sink dynamics. Overall, these spatiotemporal connectivity patterns support mainland-island dynamics in our system, highlighting the importance of persistent seed banks as enduring sources of genetic diversity.
Introduction
Continuous habitat has become a scarce resource—many organisms are scattered across habitat patches resulting from progressive fragmentation and degradation of natural areas1,2. In plants that lack long-distance dispersing propagules, landscape-scale fragmentation may limit spatial gene flow among distant patches3,4,5,6. Therefore, spatially isolated populations may diverge more and harbor less genetic variation, which can ultimately limit their adaptive response to selection7,8. However, population genetic structure may be homogenized, and local extinction risks reduced if the landscape configuration and vector availability maintain gene flow. Accordingly, effective propagule dispersal in a meta-population increases genetic connectivity which is crucial for long-term persistence. Increased immigration may particularly prevent the long-term extinction of local populations in areas subject to intensive disturbance with presumably increased mortality rates9,10,11. While the limitations of applying meta-population theory in plants have been a subject of controversy, genetic techniques have emerged as a promising tool to assess population fluctuation and migration12,13,14. However, inferring connectivity and genetic diversity from above-ground population characteristics may be misleading, as only a fraction of the actual viable population and history of local selective forces may be assessed from such single snapshot data13,15,16,17. Especially in systems with drastic short-term environmental shifts, dormancy may evolve if plants with delayed seed germination produce more surviving offspring than those whose seeds all germinate in their first year18,19.
Although seed banks can create a reservoir of genetic diversity20, rates of germination, seed mortality, and recruitment may widely differ among patches, further complicating the estimation of local extinction risks and colonization probabilities21,22,23. Tellier24 postulated that selection effects on plant fitness components may be amplified or mitigated by stochastic events when viable seed bank fractions are small. In the face of disturbance, increased genetic diversity can enhance the survival of subpopulations by potentially providing individuals with a wider range of adaptive capabilities. Consequently, in highly dynamic patch networks, the persistence of a plant meta-population critically depends on whether a species is equipped to maintain the exchange of genes among subdivided habitats and across successive generations25. Inferring current and past dispersal events can therefore unravel the dynamics of connectivity and cross-generational source-sink effects between spatially separated populations. Recent research emphasizes the role of persistent soil seed banks and their potential to decrease rates of genetic drift24,26,27. Moreover, under short-term environmental perturbation, seed banks enable the maintenance of potentially adaptive variation by balancing selection24,28,29. Indeed, soil-stored population compartments can prevent a loss of genetic diversity across multiple reproductive seasons, resulting in an overall increased effective population size30. This is particularly relevant in highly dynamic systems, such as arid environments, where local populations are expected to undergo strong demographic fluctuations with varying presence/absence in the above-ground population31,32,33,34. Numerous studies have examined the long-standing prediction of a trade-off between spatial and temporal dispersal as complementary risk spreading strategies35,36,37,38,39. While spatial dispersal is suggested to be more beneficial in spatially heterogeneous but locally stable habitats, temporal dispersal is assumed to be favored when local conditions are unpredictable.
Yet, empirical and simulation studies have discovered diverse relationships between spatial and temporal dispersal strategies, related to specific life-history traits, providing evidence for absent40,41, weak32,42, or significant38,39 negative covariation36,37. Both dispersal and dormancy have been suggested to evolve in response to the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of habitats43,44,45,46,47.
At the (meta-) population level, both seed dormancy and dispersal are predicted to increase with spatiotemporal environmental variability43,44,48.
Disentangling the relative prevalence of risk-spreading mechanisms in erratically fluctuating environments may also enhance the predictability of the potential for evolutionary rescue in populations under climate change. Although contributing to the resilience of fragmented populations, both dispersal strategies present distinct risks and opportunities in the context of range shifts34. Especially strongly structured populations that primarily track favorable conditions through recruitment from local seed rains (“dispersal in time”) are prone to extinction if the magnitude of environmental shift exceeds their niche breadth49. On the other hand, recurrent spatial dispersal may counteract local adaptation to conditions at the tolerance limit50. Consequently, climate change effects are likely to unbalance the forces of spatial and temporal rescue effects in the future51.
To date, only a few studies have addressed the spatiotemporal patterns of plant meta-populations since this requires long-term data on patch occupancy, a series of discrete habitat patches, and the assessment of potentially long-lived seed banks52. Here, we use a series of isolated wetlands as a well-suited study system to assess meta-population processes by examining above- and below-ground populations in different cohorts of the early successional short-lived monocarpic perennial species Oenanthe aquatica (L.) Poir19,53. This landscape genetic case study allows us to track signals of dispersal and thus determine the relative contribution of spatial gene flow versus seed bank recruitment in shaping local genetic variation. The target populations are distributed across small spatially distinct temporary wetlands embedded in an area of intensive agriculture. These glacially formed "kettle holes" are densely distributed habitat islands characterized by short-term changes in local hydrologic conditions, ranging from flooded to completely dry within a season, and longer-term periods of desiccation or standing water54. As hydrochorous pioneer O. aquatica is adapted to variable water levels in the study region, colonizing emerged wetland bottom when water levels recede and tolerating temporal flooding during vegetative growth. This life history likely results in population fluctuations in response to fluctuations in water levels and vegetation succession53. Due to the absence of connecting elements like ditches, the dispersal of seeds is likely restricted to regionally abundant animal vectors, such as deer species, wild boar, raccoons, and waterbirds55,56,57,58,59,60. Further, the species has been shown to form long-lived seed banks, with seed longevity, rather than dormancy, promoting storage in the soil19,53,61,62. We, therefore, expect the extent of past gene flow between the discrete habitat islands to be reflected in the genotype composition of the soil-stored viable seed pool63,64,65,66. By conducting population genetic analyses on extant populations and soil seed banks, we infer the temporal dynamics of local populations and deduce the potential connectivity among habitat islands. Our target species is a pioneer strategist with a short lifespan and our target sites and their soil strata are spatially distinct53. Taking advantage of these preconditions we aim to test (i) whether O. aquatica population structure changes over time, (ii) how the spatial configuration of habitat patches affects the genetic diversity of local populations, and (iii) if meta-population theory can explain observed population genetic patterns.
Results
Genetic diversity
Of the twenty patches examined, two (2a,12a) were excluded from further analyses as no O. aquatica individuals were found in extant or seed bank communities. Of the remaining 18 patches, six were surveyed in a previous population genetic study conducted in 2016. In two of these six patches, O. aquatica was absent from the standing vegetation in 2016. The 2019 survey confirmed the absence of a viable O. aquatica seed bank in those particular patches (Table 1). Overall 13 loci, a total of 198 alleles were scored, ranging between 6–31 alleles per locus. We detected significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in at least one population at eleven out of 13 loci in each of the two extant cohorts and at eight out of 13 loci in each seed bank cohort (Supplementary Figure s1). Nevertheless, none of the loci consistently deviated from HWE proportions (as would be expected with abundant null alleles/allelic dropouts), hence all loci were included in further analyses. Low levels of Multilocus Linkage Disequilibrium rd were observed in four populations of seed bank and extant cohorts ranging from 0.029 to 0.06 (Supplementary Table s1). Except for one recent seed bank cohort (P09_S1), FIS values were generally positive indicating prevalent heterozygote deficiencies in most populations.
Pairwise comparisons of the genetic diversity between extant (cohort 2019) and soil (cohort S2) populations revealed no significant differences over time in any of the parameters examined (Supplementary Table s2). AR varied between 3.743 and 5.846 (mean=4.617) with consistent values among cohorts of the same population. Overall average HE was 0.637 with values ranging from 0.554 to 0.702. HO was generally lower than HE (mean=0.571), with values ranging from 0.269 to 0.692 (Supplementary Table s1). Over the sampled cohorts, variation of population-level genetic diversity and inbreeding revealed no directional pattern.
Spatio-temporal connectivity
A nested Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) with cohort samples grouped according to their respective population revealed that most genetic variation (87.32%) was found within cohorts, while only 1.31% was attributable to the differentiation between cohorts within populations. Genetic differentiation among populations accounted for 11.38% of the observed genetic variance (Table 2). STRUCTURE analysis inferred 16 distinct genetic clusters in a pooled sample set including all cohorts under default prior settings. Individual assignment of posterior membership probabilities confirmed stable genetic composition over time, which is illustrated by the shared color.distribution in seed banks and extant cohorts within populations (Fig. 1), whereas clusters were highly segregated among sampling sites. At the same time, STRUCTURE indicated local gene flow as several populations showed genetic impact on neighboring populations. In one instance, two adjacent southwestern populations were assigned to the same genetic cluster (grey-brown−P13, P14). We found five kettle holes with no viable seed banks, but individuals still formed separate clusters specific to each kettle hole (Fig. 1). This suggests that recent colonization from other populations we studied is unlikely. The results based on modified cluster settings to account for unbalanced sample sizes (see methods) revealed a largely consistent population structure. However, some smaller populations without detected seed banks exhibited increased levels of admixture with neighboring sites or ambiguous cluster memberships across adjacent sites (Supplementary Figure s2) which suggests an enhanced genetic affinity between populations at the local scale, i.e., within regions.
Similar results were obtained from STRUCTURE analyses using random subsamples of genotype data with a maximum of ten samples from each site regardless of cohorts (Supplementary Figure s2). Consistent with the cluster analysis, the NJ-tree inferred from Edwards distances over all cohorts showed substantial structuring with cohorts of the same population grouped together, emphasizing the genetic affinity between cohorts indicated by bootstrap support (Fig. 2). Moreover, as revealed by STRUCTURE analysis, the populations P13 and P14 cluster together.
None of the five remaining populations with only one cohort in 2019 showed an apparent genetic affinity to any of the sampled populations. The geographical configuration of populations is not fully reflected by the tree topology, as spatially adjacent populations were not consistently grouped.
In the individual-based NJ- tree, the overall population structure is less well resolved, but individuals are largely grouped by their population of origin without subdivision by cohort (Fig. 2), indicating low admixture across clusters. Furthermore, GENECLASS2 determined a high self-assignment rate of 89.6%, with 512 of 570 individuals assigned to their respective sampling location. Of the 58 remaining individuals, 21 had a low probability of descent from any of the study populations, indicating either descent from unobserved genotypes or immigration from unsampled populations. 37 individuals were assigned to populations from adjacent or distant patches (Supplementary Table s3). Ten first-generation migrants (0.018%) were identified by the Lhome approach with six of them in accordance with the assignment test (Fig. 3). Half of the recent migrations occurred between patches less than 1.5 km (160 to 1400 m) apart, while the other half were found over distances greater than 5 km (6 km to 12 km). On average, 92% of the specimens of the extant cohort 2019 descend from the previous cohorts of the same population. These results generally point towards strong among-cohort-connectivity, limited dispersal between patches, and cross-cohort gene flow. Finally, pairwise G'st comparisons between populations (pooled across cohorts) were all significant (mean = 0.330), suggesting considerable population divergence (Supplementary Table s4), indicating substantial steady spatial population structure.
Nested AMOVA analysis of pooled cohort samples, grouped by site and aggregated into three geographic regions (refer to Table 1), showed genetic variation among regions was lower (2.01%) than that among populations within regions (11.48%, Supplementary Table s5).
Spatially explicit genetic structure
A significant asymptotic increase of individual pairwise genetic distances with geographic distance was observed in the aboveground and seed bank cohorts indicating consistent spatial restriction of gene flow (Fig. 4). Accordingly, Mantel tests revealed significant isolation-by-distance patterns (p < 0.001) in all cohorts (r19 = 0.294, n19 = 317; rS1 = 0.412, nS1 = 72; rS2 = 0.3102, nS2 = 122). The MEM analysis showed significant but weak spatial genetic structure among populations in three analyzed cohorts (p19 < 0.001, pS1 < 0.001, pS2 = 0.019). We identified two MEMGENE axes for 2019 and three for each soil bank cohort (MEMGENE1-3) that explained 7–10% of the genetic variation underlying Moran’s eigenvector maps (MEMs; Fig. 5). Each of the first MEMGENE variables showed a similar pattern of shared genetic neighborhoods among populations explaining most of the variation (35–51%) and separating the populations into a southern and a northern subgroup. A transition zone with increased admixture along the southwestern locations is suggested for 2019 by MEMGENE1 (Fig. 5a). This is corroborated by the resistance analysis based on IBD residuals, which delineates a dispersal corridor along southwestern localities (Fig. 5). Putative dispersal barriers are inferred in areas of increased urbanization and along large forests (Fig. 5).
Landscape configuration effects on genetic diversity
An impact of spatial isolation, i.e. nearest neighbor distance, and habitat size on measures of local genetic diversity was found in extant cohorts 2019 (Fig. 6). Increased distances to the nearest neighbor patch result in a decrease in HO and increased local inbreeding. None of the genetic diversity measures were affected by the local habitat size, measured as patch area (Supplementary Table s6). Finally, neither allelic richness nor expected heterozygosity was related to any habitat configuration measure or their interaction.
Discussion
Spatio-temporal connectivity of O. aquatica in a dynamic landscape
Our results on spatiotemporal connectivity of O. aquatica across kettle holes are relevant in two major respects: firstly, we found genetic differentiation and restricted gene-flow among sampling sites in all cohorts and across varying spatial scales from a few hundred meters up to several kilometers. These findings emphasize the pronounced divergence exhibited among populations, even at small spatial scales. And secondly, the persistence of the overall connectivity patterns and the sustained levels of genetic differentiation in the study system provide robust empirical support for temporal stability in population structure. This is supported by the pronounced isolation-by-distance pattern observed in all cohorts and a clear separation of most populations (across both extant plants and seed banks) into unique clusters. In particular, long-established populations exhibit nearly unchanged allele frequencies over the period studied here. Overlapping generations in O. aquatica could promote cross-cohort gene flow and the maintenance of local genetic variation. Conversely, the substantial genetic divergence among populations is likely the result of genetic drift due to long-lasting habitat isolation and small population sizes. With increasing population isolation, the influence of genetic drift surpasses that of gene flow, resulting in pronounced differentiation between most of the sites. The asymptotic IBD pattern suggests that dispersal is limited to a local scale, implying that landscape barriers, i.e. the agricultural matrix, are impeding gene flow across longer distances67. Some admixture across sites is however suggested by the population structure analyses and inferred migration events.
STRUCTURE clustering and GENECLASS2 assignment tests showed an increase of connectivity between spatially adjacent patches in a few cases, but also indicate a (re-) colonization of patches with presumably limited or absent seed banks (i.e., those sites where no germinations were observed in any of the soil bank samples). Interestingly, of the limited number of recent migrants inferred, a considerable proportion were long-distance migrants. Animal vectors with large home ranges, such as waterbirds and large mammals may contribute to this spread by using kettle holes for shelter or foraging, facilitating seed deposition through ingestion or adhesion55,56,57,59,60. Individual sites harbor genetically distinct populations with repeated local recruitment and formation of persistent soil seed banks. Genetic variation partitioning confirmed a substantial divergence among local populations, despite occasional outcrossing with variants from nearby sites, as well as rare, but traceable, long-distance dispersal (Table 2). A small but significant proportion of genetic variation was assigned to differentiation among regions (Supplementary Table s5), underscoring genetic affinity among sites to be related to proximity.
At individual sites, genetic diversity stochastically varies among cohorts, presumably reflecting varying degrees of drift due to local environmental fluctuations (Supplementary Table s1, s2). The monocarpic life cycle of O. aquatica, reproducing once and then dying, may account for variations in genetic diversity and population size over time. Thus, patterns of pulsed reproduction can arise causing rapid population growth followed by a sudden decline, as new generations compete for resources. Overall, many populations in the habitat network store a long-term viable, diverse seed bank and therefore are not primarily driven by recurrent extinction/recolonization dynamics as assumed by classical meta-population theory proposed by Levins12,68.
However, variation in functional connectivity, including short-term changes in the occurrence of populations (as, e.g., in P01, P07) and genetically inferred dispersal across some kettle holes comprise features of meta-population dynamics. In particular, the occurrence of O. aquatica at patches with no detectable seed bank suggests recruitment from transient seedbanks or recent colonization.
Such colonization would require some recent synchronization of favorable conditions among donor and recipient patches69. Water regimes among individual kettle holes are typically asynchronous. However, short-term synchronization, e.g. intense spring flooding in a range of patches may occur occasionally. Kettle holes in this region were reported to overflow after snowmelt and to dry up during the summer period54,70. Stepping stone dispersal facilitated by mobile linkers, such as waterbirds56,71, could enable the repeated transport and accumulation of O. aquatica seeds among these flooded patches throughout the season. The absence of dormancy has been suggested to increase colonization success as it enables the species to rapidly exploit available resources under favorable conditions19. Such processes would promote regional connectivity in the long term. Further, ephemeral local populations may emerge occasionally based on randomly occurring mass effects, based e.g. on zoochorous dispersal, given that some patches may provide less suitable conditions for seed longevity22. Such ephemeral populations with rather transient seed banks (as represented by the grey-brown genetic cluster − P13, P14; cf. Figure 1) may emerge as a result of a 'recolonization rescue' (Hanski72). Short-term favorable conditions and occasional seed influx may promote the sudden emergence of large O. aquatica populations, capable of forming monotypic stands from a small number of individuals53. A community study conducted in 2015 in the same study area suggests mass effect processes to be prevalent in non-flooded patches73, as these may be characterized by (1) temporarily increased mobile link movements and/or (2) prolonged dry periods associated with higher seed or seedling mortality in amphibious plant species.
However, the genetic consequences of the two described dispersal scenarios will differ. High genetic diversity is expected in populations emerged from diverse migrant seed variants accumulated in short-term standing waters, e.g., at P14 and P16. Contrary, when recovering from high mortality, large populations may emerge from recent immigration of a few variants in drier environments. Here, founder effects/bottlenecks may cause reduced genetic diversity 74, as observed in the most spatially isolated populations, i.e., P12 and P10 (Supplementary Table s1). Such effects can be mitigated if gene flow via pollen is maintained between patches 75. Any of these scenarios could apply to those local populations where no soil seed banks were detected and are in line with the observed isolation-by-distance (IBD) pattern. This IBD population structure suggests a stepping-stone dynamic in our study system, which is further corroborated by contemporary dispersal being predominantly inferred among adjacent sites.
With our methodology, we cannot fully exclude that seeds in the soil remained undetected. Specifically, if a population without a detected seed bank forms a unique cluster, it could originate from scarce seeds bearing a local genotype. However, the high seed production of our studied species and our small-scale sampling of both soil and extant populations make this interpretation less probable. Therefore, we consider it more likely that those populations which form their own genetic cluster but do not hold a detectable seed bank have been colonized by specimens from a population not sampled in our study.
In future studies, it would be worth monitoring the longevity of seed banks in different hydrological regimes to identify factors that limit seed viability in soil banks. Moreover, determining population demographic structure and phenology in different environments could provide information on the role of environmental synchronization. Such information could improve the reliability of predictions about how stable the observed population connectivity may be under altered environmental conditions.
Consequences of spatial isolation and local habitat features
Taking into account that aquatic plants cannot colonize the surrounding agriculturally utilized matrix, kettle holes play a key role as connective landscape structures with stepping-stone functions76, as confirmed by the inferred IBD pattern in our study system. Populations with a long-lived seed bank represent starting points for recolonization rescue, from where local variation slowly propagates across the landscape. This is in agreement with the significant latitudinal cline detected by spatially explicit analyses, separating northern and southern populations with an increased admixture at the geographical center. As precipitation is a major driver of kettle hole hydrological conditions, increased levels of connectivity between adjacent habitat patches are likely linked to local environmental synchrony77,78. Small-scale patch configuration effects on local diversity were already shown in plant meta-communities exhibiting a decline in species richness with increasing spatial isolation and decreasing patch area 59,79. We confirmed noticeable effects of isolation on local genetic diversity at the population level (Fig. 6) and found inbreeding to increase with distance from the nearest neighbor patch, which points towards the relative importance of mobile link movement 80,81. Limited pollinator availability in isolated patches74 may lead to increased levels of selfing and therefore elevated inbreeding at these sites. A reduced seed dispersal may lead to clustering of closely related offspring near parent plants which could explain enhanced inbreeding at remote habitat patches likely less frequented by large mobile linkers. The effect of patch size on local genetic diversity was negligible. Increased inter-specific competition may suppress seedling recruitment in O. aquatica at late successional stages when competitive species dominate. This process is likely more pronounced in larger patches 59,60 and ultimately results in an ephemeral population built up. Hence, unlike in populations that undergo progressive fragmentation of continuous habitat, the extent of genetic variation and connectivity in our naturally scattered study system is less a matter of patch size79 than a matter of small-scale environmental conditions and historical population establishment.
Conclusion
We here assessed the spatiotemporal connectivity dynamics in a presumed aquatic plant meta-population system. Our combined approach of spatial and temporal sampling allowed us to track recent colonization events and to uncover stepping-stone dynamics with source-sink effects. These were primarily based on dispersal from local long-term persistent to spatially adjacent ephemeral populations, pointing to recolonization rescue effects as predicted by meta-population theory82. We showed a significant spatial genetic structure and found repeated local recruitment to largely shape the current O. aquatica population structure. Stepping-stone processes transgenerational gene flow are likely to maintain population viability with waves of dispersal occurring in response to temporary environmental synchrony of favorable patch conditions. Our study further highlights the crucial role of soil seed banks in serving as a source to maintain and spread variation and hence to significantly contribute to the long-term persistence of O. aquatica in the kettle hole system. In the face of climate change, a future drawback to population connectivity may be regional droughts that increase the distances among patches to a level that pollen and seeds cannot easily travel. A lack of immigrant variants may cause genetic erosion, further limiting the ability of local populations to adjust to harsh environmental changes24. It remains to be elucidated whether recurrent spatial dispersal is sufficient to maintain population connectivity under potentially increasing population separation in the course of long-term environmental change.
Methods
Study area
The study was conducted in the ’AgroscapeLab Quillow’ (www.zalf.de/de/struktur/eip/Seiten/AgroScapeLab.aspx), an open research platform covering an area of approximately 268 km2 in Brandenburg, Northeast-Germany (cf. Figure 1). The site is characterized by a mosaic of wide open areas of cropland, grassland, and mixed forest. Most agricultural land has been conventionally farmed for decades, resulting in a seasonal rotation of large monotypic stands. Several hundred small glacial wetlands (“kettle holes”) ranging in size from 0.01 to 3 ha are heterogeneously scattered throughout the area (up to 40 per km2)and provide unique habitat for a range of (semi-) aquatic communities54,73,76,81,83. Periodic changes of local water regimes vary asynchronously depending on size, steepness, and successional stage, and occur at different time scales driven by seasonal precipitation54.
Study species
Fine-leaved water Dropwort, Oenanthe aquatica (Apiaceae) is a diploid annual to perennial monocarpic, amphibious plant species frequently occurring in disturbed eutrophic stagnant waters and ditches on muddy sediments19,84. As a wetland colonizer, O. aquatica is found in habitats with strong fluctuations in water levels. In environments with regular recurrent flooding events, populations can build up dominant stands. The species can produce high numbers of long-lived seeds, ranging from a few hundred to several tens of thousands per individual, that can be dispersed through hydrochory or animal vectors and may accumulate in the soil19,53. As typical in Apiacean species, flowers are protandrous and pollinated by a range of insects covering different taxonomic orders85. O. aquatica is a non-clonal, predominantly outcrossing species, however, incidences of selfing have also been observed57.
Sampling and molecular analyses
Integrated with a soil community study, 20 kettle holes were selected for tissue and soil core sampling of O. aquatica populations in spring 2019, including two sites without O. aquatica in the extant plant community. These kettle holes comprised eight pairs of spatially proximate sites (several 100 meters apart) distributed across three spatial clusters (>5 km apart) as well as four intermediate sites selected as putative stepping stones between clusters (Table 1). For genotyping above-ground populations, plant material was collected from rosette leaves of juvenile plants at 18 kettle holes. Sampled individuals were separated by at least 1.5 meters. For locations with n<10 extant individuals, we sampled the whole population. As local abundances varied considerably, sample sizes ranged from two to 22 individuals (mean=15.1±7.4) per kettle hole, resulting in a total of 317 individuals. In parallel, soil cores were taken with a 15-cm drill at four 1 m2 squares, along a moisture gradient reflected in the extant vegetation from the ruderal edge to the central aquatic zone to account for local variation in seed bank stock at each kettle hole, as the distribution of genetic diversity in soil populations may be affected by water availability over time. Four samples were taken from each 1 m2 spot. Subsequently, the upper and lower 5 cm soil layers were separated, and each combined for each 1 m2 spot, resulting in four upper and four lower composite soil core samples per location. Core chronologies of kettle holes in the focus research region suggest that the upper soil layers reflect recent seed rains, while the lower sample seed fraction dates back several decades in the past86. In the greenhouse, a 2 cm thick layer (~480 ml) of each composite core sample was spread on a sandy substrate layer (2 cm ~480 ml) in a plastic tray. Using the emergence method of van der Valk & Davis (1978), a randomized flooding treatment was applied to induce germination at natural water-logged habitat conditions. This method has proven effective for assessing both persistent and transient seed banks in ephemeral wetlands87. Samples were exposed to natural light regime and day and night temperature of 23−30 and 18 °C, respectively. After morphological identification, seedlings other than O. aquatica were removed to reduce competition. Leaf tissue was sampled when reaching two-leaf-stage, yielding a total of 194 samples from viable soil populations in both layers of ten study sites, while for one further site, a viable population was found only in the upper layer. All leaf samples including soil bank seedling tissue were preserved in 96% EtOH at -20 C until further processing. Voucher specimens (species identification by Maxi Tomowski and Michael Ristow) are deposited at the Unit of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Germany under the number MT-2023-001.
Genomic DNA of O. aquatica populations was extracted using a modified CTAB protocol as described by Inglis et al.88. Each individual was genotyped for 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci described in Favre-Bac et al.89 (O_01, O_03, O_10, O_13, O_13, O_17, O_18, O_20, O_21, O_28, O_32, O_37, O_38, O_47). For multiplexing, forward primers of each primer pair were differently fluorescent-labeled (FAM, VIC, NED, PET) and assembled in 6 Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR) (Supplementary Table s7). PCR products were separated via electrophoresis using a 3500 Genetic Analyser Sequencer (Applied Biosystems Hitachi). Allelic peak sizes were identified from resulting electropherograms using GeneMapper software (Version 5.0, Applied Biosystems). For three of our study sites, genotype data for the same microsatellites were available for the 2016 extant population60. To enable their inclusion for comparison, these data were calibrated (for laboratory methodological details, see60). Allele size data for a total of 579 individuals is provided in the supplementary Table s8. In subsequent analyses, we considered all emerged plants sampled within one season or seedlings emerging from one seed bank stratum as a distinct cohort, resulting in two aboveground cohorts (‘2019’, ‘2016’) and two belowground cohorts (‘Soil1’, ‘Soil2’).
Data analyses
Genetic diversity and patch-network configuration
Measures of genetic diversity were estimated in R (Version 4.2.2)90 and R studio (Version 2022.7.1.554)91 for all cohorts with n ≥ 8 of each local population. For each population’s cohort and locus, we tested for significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg-Equilibrium using the hw.test function from the pegas package92 with 1,000 permutations. To assess multilocus linkage disequilibrium (LD) we computed the standardized index of association rd93 calling the ia() function from the poppr package94. Significant deviation from the expectation of linkage equilibrium among loci was tested using 1,000 permutations, followed by a Bonferroni-correction of significance levels. We calculated descriptive statistics, including observed and expected heterozygosity (HO, HE) calling the bootstrapHet function implemented in the popgenkit package95, and rarefied allelic richness (AR), unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHE), total allele number as well as the inbreeding coefficient FIS using the hierfstat package96. Confidence intervals for He, Ho, and Fis were determined using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The mlg.id function implemented in the poppr package94 was called to identify putative clones. Effects of patch area, nearest-neighbor patch distance, and their interaction on diversity estimates AR, HE, HO, and FIS of cohorts (n ≥ 8) were assessed in R running generalized linear models (GLMs) with Gaussian distributions and z-transformed variables. We performed a stepwise backward selection to reveal best-fit models (minimum AIC) excluding variables iteratively from the full model. Effect size R2pseudo was calculated using the MuMin package97. Patch area and distance to the nearest-neighbor patch were determined using Google Earth Pro 7.3.6.9345 (Supplementary Table s1).
Spatial genetic structure
Inter-individual genetic distances were calculated with the R package poppr94 using Edwards chord distance98,99 for seed banks and standing cohorts separately. A Mantel test for isolation by distance (IBD) was conducted to test whether genetic distances and geographic Euclidean distances are correlated, using the R package adegenet100. The significance of correlations was assessed using the mantel.randtest function with 1,000 permutations. Additionally, linear regression models were applied for each correlation by the lm function in R using log-transformed and original geographic distance data. The best-fit model based on R2 was chosen for IBD calculation. To identify potential barriers to gene flow and spatial genetic patterns, the mgQuick function in the MEMGENE package100 was used to integrate geographic configuration with genetic distance based on Moran’s eigenvector maps (MEM)101. This stepwise analysis was performed separately for each set of cohorts using Edwards genetic distances between individuals and patch coordinates. Significant MEM eigenvectors were obtained through forward selection with 1,000 permutations followed by a redundancy analysis (RDA) to determine the proportion of explained variation by each eigenvector. Finally, MEMGENE axes were computed to assess spatial genetic neighborhoods. Moreover, we conducted a resistance analysis based on the deviation from IBD for the aboveground population 2019 to identify recent dispersal corridors and barriers, using the ResDisMapper package102. In this analysis, the residuals obtained from the isolation by distance method (see above) were considered as line segments connecting each pair of individuals across our target landscape. To calculate resistance, the landscape was divided into a grid of cells and the resistance of each cell was computed by averaging the IBD residuals of all lines that traverse the cell. The significance of resistance was obtained using 1,000 permutations. We mapped interpolated resistance scores as well as corridors and barriers based on confidence limits. This method requires no prior information about dispersal-limiting environmental characteristics and has been shown to produce accurate resistance values at small spatial scales102,103.
Spatio-temporal genetic variation
To test whether individuals can be assigned to distinct genetic groups following increased differentiation among sampled locations, Bayesian genetic clustering was performed using STRUCTURE Version 2.3.4104. Using a fused dataset comprising samples of all cohorts, the likelihood for the number of putative genetic clusters (K) was estimated to evaluate structuring among years and sites. We ran ten simulations for each K from two to 42 (the total number of local cohorts across all populations) under the admixture model without prior population information. Parameter settings involved a burn-in period of 100,000 iterations followed by 500,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) repetitions. The optimal number of clusters was determined by plotting the likelihood of K for each value of K (LnPr⌈X|K⌉) using the △K method105 in the Pophelper package106 in R. Clustering results of individual membership probabilities were visualized with the implemented pophelperShiny App.
The relative contribution of each inferred genetic cluster per population and cohort was illustrated as a pie chart on a physical map. To account for the putative effects of differences in sample size in STRUCTURE, we conducted a separate analysis using the admixture model with uncorrelated allele frequencies and an ancestry prior α = 0.026 (1/number of expected populations107) using the same settings as in the previous analyses. Additional STRUCTURE analyses with a maximum of ten random subsamples from each site, regardless of cohorts, were performed for ten compiled sample sets based on the default model priors and the same settings. A complementary neighbor-joining tree (NJ- tree) based on Edwards genetic distance with 1,000 bootstrap replicates was constructed in ape for cohort level (n ≥ 5) and individual level analyses to assess spatial and temporal divergence simultaneously NJ-trees were visualized using ggtree108.
To test for partitioning of variation among populations and between cohorts, an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed in Arlequin Version 3.5109 using 20,000 permutations. We, therefore, selected a subset of populations, for which at least two of four cohorts (2019, 2016, S1, S2) were available with a minimum sample size of n = 8 per cohort. Levels of spatial population structuring were further examined using pairwise G’st110 among populations. Given the low variability across cohorts within populations (see Results), cohorts (n ≥ 8) were pooled for any population before the calculation of G’st. We tested for the significance of G’st values by estimating 95% confidence intervals based on 1,000 bootstraps over loci using the diveRsity package111. We performed a further nested AMOVA analysis on pooled cohort samples grouped by each site (npooled > 8) and aggregated into three regions (Table 1) to examine the partitioning of variance within and among regions.
Recent dispersal and signals of immigration were inferred by a stepwise assignment procedure in GENECLASS2112. First, we conducted the implemented self-assignment test to assign or exclude reference populations as possible origins for each individual. Therefore, we calculated individual assignment probabilities by the Monte Carlo resampling method proposed by Paetkau et al. (2004)113 with 10,000 simulations and assessed source population log-likelihood under the Bayesian Criterion of Rannala & Mountain (1997)114. As a baseline for individual assignments, we pooled the data from all cohorts per population115. A probability threshold of 0.01 was set to exclude individuals likely originating from unsampled sources. Additionally, we detected potential first-generation migrants under the Bayesian Criterion of Rannala & Mountain114 using the same resampling algorithm to calculate the likelihood of individuals belonging to their local gene pool or external ones. A probability threshold of α = 0.01 was set to reduce the probability of false positives (i.e., incorrect identification of residents as immigrants) 114,116. We further examined dispersal in time by determining the proportion of the most recent cohorts (2019) classified as descendants of earlier cohorts. For this, we created representative reference data for each local population by removing putative immigrant samples detected during the first two steps115 resulting in ten local datasets. 2019 population data and reference data from previous cohorts (2016, S1, S2; only cohorts with n ≥ 5 considered) were selected to perform an assignment test as earlier (α = 0.01).
Declaration on ethics and research permits
We hereby declare that our experimental research and field studies on cultivated and wild plants, including the collection of plant material, are in accordance with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. Leaf samples of Oenanthe aquatica were collected under a sampling permit issued by the State environmental authority LfU Brandenburg (Germany).
Data availability
All datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available in the main text and supplementary material. Additional information can be obtained from the corresponding author on request.
References
Lindenmayer, D. B. & Fischer, J. Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: An ecological and conservation synthesis. (Island Press, 2013).
Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015).
Bohrer, G., Nathan, R. & Volis, S. Effects of long-distance dispersal for metapopulation survival and genetic structure at ecological time and spatial scales. J. Ecol. 93, 1029–1040 (2005).
Aguilar, R., Quesada, M., Ashworth, L., Herrerias-Diego, Y. & Lobo, J. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: Susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol. Ecol. 17, 5177–5188 (2008).
Vellend, M. Effects of diversity on diversity: Consequences of competition and facilitation. Oikos 117, 1075–1085 (2008).
Schleicher, A., Biedermann, R. & Kleyer, M. Dispersal traits determine plant response to habitat connectivity in an urban landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 26, 529–540 (2011).
Lande, R. & Shannon, S. The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 434–437 (1996).
Hill, W. G. & Mackay, T. F. C. D. S. Falconer and introduction to quantitative genetics. Genetics 167, 1529–1536 (2004).
Hanski, I. A. & Gaggiotti, O. E. Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. (Academic Press, 2004).
Leibold, M. A. et al. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 601–613 (2004).
Ouborg, N. J. & Eriksson, O. 18—Toward a metapopulation concept for plants. In: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations (eds. Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O. E.) 447–469 (Academic Press, 2004).
Husband, B. C. & Barrett, S. C. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J. Ecol. 461–469 (1996).
Freckleton, R. P. & Watkinson, A. R. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: Metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. J. Ecol. 90, 419–434 (2002).
Pannell, J. R. & Obbard, D. J. Probing the primacy of the patch: What makes a metapopulation?. J. Ecol. 91, 485–488 (2003).
Honnay, O., Jacquemyn, H., Bossuyt, B. & Hermy, M. Forest fragmentation effects on patch occupancy and population viability of herbaceous plant species. New Phytol. 166, 723–736 (2005).
Honnay, O., Bossuyt, B., Jacquemyn, H., Shimono, A. & Uchiyama, K. Can a seed bank maintain the genetic variation in the above ground plant population?. Oikos 117, 1–5 (2008).
Ellstrand, N. C. Is gene flow the most important evolutionary force in plants?. Am. J. Bot. 101, 737–753 (2014).
Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Germination ecophysiology of herbaceous plant species in a temperate region. Am. J. Bot. 75, 286–305 (1988).
Jensch, D. & Poschlod, P. Germination ecology of two closely related taxa in the genus Oenanthe: Fine tuning for the habitat?. Aquat. Bot. 89, 345–351 (2008).
Warner, R. R. & Chesson, P. L. Coexistence mediated by recruitment fluctuations: A field guide to the storage effect. Am. Nat. 125, 769–787 (1985).
Bekker, R. M. et al. Soil seed banks in European grasslands: Does land use affect regeneration perspectives? J. Appl. Ecol. 1293–1310 (1997).
Bekker, R. M., Bakker, J. P., Ozinga, W. & Thompson, K. Seed traits: Essential for understanding seed longevity. Asp. Appl. Biol. 69(1), 69 (2003).
Thompson, K. The functional ecology of soil seed banks. (CABI, 2000).
Tellier, A. Persistent seed banking as eco-evolutionary determinant of plant nucleotide diversity: Novel population genetics insights. New Phytol. 221, 725–730 (2019).
Fréville, H., Choquet, R., Pradel, R. & Cheptou, P.-O. Inferring seed bank from hidden Markov models: New insights into metapopulation dynamics in plants. J. Ecol. 101, 1572–1580 (2013).
Shoemaker, W. R. & Lennon, J. T. Evolution with a seed bank: The population genetic consequences of microbial dormancy. Evol. Appl. 11, 60–75 (2018).
Lennon, J. T., den Hollander, F., Wilke-Berenguer, M. & Blath, J. Principles of seed banks and the emergence of complexity from dormancy. Nat. Commun. 12, 4807 (2021).
Levin, D. A. The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. Am. Nat. 135, 563–572 (1990).
Schulz, B., Durka, W., Danihelka, J. & Eckstein, R. L. Differential role of a persistent seed bank for genetic variation in early vs. late successional stages. PLoS ONE 13, e0209840 (2018).
Lundemo, S., Falahati-Anbaran, M. & Stenøien, H. K. Seed banks cause elevated generation times and effective population sizes of Arabidopsis thaliana in northern Europe. Mol. Ecol. 18, 2798–2811 (2009).
Frisch, D. Dormancy, dispersal and the survival of cyclopoid copepods (cyclopoida, copepoda) in a lowland floodplain. Freshw. Biol. 47, 1269–1281 (2002).
Dostál, P. Is the population turnover of patchy-distributed annuals determined by dormancy dynamics or dispersal processes?. Ecography 28, 745–756 (2005).
Siewert, W. & Tielbörger, K. Dispersal-dormancy relationships in annual plants: Putting model predictions to the test. Am. Nat. 176, 490–500 (2010).
Kremer, A. et al. Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 15, 378–392 (2012).
Siewert, W., Tielbörger, K., Harrison, A. E. S. & Shaw, E. R. G. Dispersal-dormancy relationships in annual plants: Putting model predictions to the test. Am. Nat. 176, 490–500 (2010).
Buoro, M. & Carlson, S. M. Life-history syndromes: Integrating dispersal through space and time. Ecol. Lett. 17, 756–767 (2014).
Rubio de Casas, R., Donohue, K., Venable, D. L. & Cheptou, P.-O. Gene-flow through space and time: Dispersal, dormancy and adaptation to changing environments. Evol. Ecol. 29, 813–831 (2015).
de Waal, C., Anderson, B. & Ellis, A. G. Dispersal, dormancy and life-history tradeoffs at the individual, population and species levels in southern African asteraceae. New Phytol. 210, 356–365 (2016).
Chen, S.-C., Poschlod, P., Antonelli, A., Liu, U. & Dickie, J. B. Trade-off between seed dispersal in space and time. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1635–1642 (2020).
Eriksson, O. Evolution of seed dispersal and recruitment in clonal plants. Oikos 63, 439–448 (1992).
Stevens, V. M. et al. Dispersal syndromes and the use of life-histories to predict dispersal. Evol. Appl. 6, 630–642 (2013).
Eriksson, O. Regional dynamics of plants: A review of evidence for remnant. Source-Sink Metapopulations. Oikos 77, 248–258 (1996).
Levin, S. A., Cohen, D. & Hastings, A. Dispersal strategies in patchy environments. Theor. Popul. Biol. 26, 165–191 (1984).
Cohen, D. & Levin, S. A. The interaction between dispersal and dormancy strategies in varying and heterogeneous environments. In: Mathematical topics in population biology, morphogenesis and neurosciences: proceedings of an international symposium held in kyoto, november 10–15, 1985 (eds. Teramoto, E. & Yumaguti, M.) 110–122 (Springer, 1987).
Venable, D. L. & Brown, J. S. The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. Am. Nat. 131, 360–384 (1988).
Snyder, R. E. Multiple risk reduction mechanisms: Can dormancy substitute for dispersal?. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1106–1114 (2006).
Zhang, Y. et al. Seed dormancy in space and time: Global distribution, paleoclimatic and present climatic drivers, and evolutionary adaptations. New Phytol. 234, 1770–1781 (2022).
Vitalis, R., Rousset, F., Kobayashi, Y., Olivieri, I. & Gandon, S. The joint evolution of dispersal and dormancy in a metapopulation with local extinctions and kin competition. Evolution 67, 1676–1691 (2013).
Weiss-Lehman, C. & Shaw, A. K. Spatial population structure determines extinction risk in climate-induced range shifts. Am. Nat. 195, 31–42 (2020).
Bolnick, D. I. & Nosil, P. Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load. Evolution 61, 2229–2243 (2007).
Bohonak, A. J. & Jenkins, D. G. Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecol. Lett. 6, 783–796 (2003).
Alexander, H. M. et al. Metapopulations and metacommunities: Combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology. J. Ecol. 100, 88–103 (2012).
Hroudová, Z., Zákravskỳ, P., Hrouda, L. & Ostrỳ, I. Oenanthe aquatica (L.) Poir.: Seed reproduction, population structure, habitat conditions and distribution in Czechoslovakia. Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 27, 301–335 (1992).
Kalettka, T. & Rudat, C. Hydrogeomorphic types of glacially created kettle holes in North-East Germany. Limnologica 36, 54–64 (2006).
Soons, M. B., Vlugt, C. V. D., Lith, B. V., Heil, G. W. & Klaassen, M. Small seed size increases the potential for dispersal of wetland plants by ducks. J. Ecol. 96, 619–627 (2008).
Green, A. J., Soons, M. B., Brochet, A.-L. & Kleyheeg, E. Dispersal of plants by waterbirds. (2016).
Favre-Bac, L., Mony, C., Ernoult, A., Burel, F. & Arnaud, J.-F. Ditch network sustains functional connectivity and influences patterns of gene flow in an intensive agricultural landscape. Heredity 116, 200–212 (2016).
Nehring, S. Warum der gebietsfremde Waschbär naturschutzfachlich eine invasive Art ist—trotz oder gerade wegen aktueller Forschungsergebnisse [Why the non-indigenous raccoon is an invasive species from a nature conservation perspective—Despite or because of current research findings]. Nat. Landsch. 93, 453–461 (2018).
Schöpke, B., Heinze, J., Pätzig, M. & Heinken, T. Do dispersal traits of wetland plant species explain tolerance against isolation effects in naturally fragmented habitats?. Plant Ecol. 220, 801–815 (2019).
Lozada-Gobilard, S., Schwarzer, C., Dyer, R., Tiedemann, R. & Joshi, J. Genetic diversity and connectivity in plant species differing in clonality and dispersal mechanisms in wetland island habitats. J. Hered. 112, 108–121 (2021).
Blomqvist, M. M., Bekker, R. M. & Vos, P. Restoration of ditch bank plant species richness: The potential of the soil seed bank. Appl. Veg. Sci. 6, 179–188 (2003).
Leyer, I. Dispersal, diversity and distribution patterns in pioneer vegetation: The role of river-floodplain connectivity. J. Veg. Sci. 17, 407–416 (2006).
Simpson, R. L. Seed banks: General concepts and methodological issues. Ecol. Soil Seed Banks 3–8 (1989).
Brendonck, L. & De Meester, L. Egg banks in freshwater zooplankton: Evolutionary and ecological archives in the sediment. Hydrobiologia 491, 65–84 (2003).
Summers, J. L., Bernik, B., Saunders, C. J., McLachlan, J. S. & Blum, M. J. A century of genetic variation inferred from a persistent soil-stored seed bank. Evol. Appl. 11, 1715–1731 (2018).
Weider, L. J., Jeyasingh, P. D. & Frisch, D. Evolutionary aspects of resurrection ecology: Progress, scope, and applications—An overview. Evol. Appl. 11, 3–10 (2018).
van Strien, M. J., Holderegger, R. & Van Heck, H. J. Isolation-by-distance in landscapes: Considerations for landscape genetics. Heredity 114, 27–37 (2015).
Hanski, I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396, 41–49 (1998).
Larroque, J. et al. Temporal variation in spatial genetic structure during population outbreaks: Distinguishing among different potential drivers of spatial synchrony. Evol. Appl. 12, 1931–1945 (2019).
Kalettka, T. XIII-7.20 Landschaftspflege in verschiedenen Lebensräumen: Sölle. Handb. Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Ecomed Landsb. (1999).
Kleyheeg, E., Treep, J., de Jager, M., Nolet, B. A. & Soons, M. B. Seed dispersal distributions resulting from landscape-dependent daily movement behaviour of a key vector species. Anas platyrhynchos. J. Ecol. 105, 1279–1289 (2017).
Hanski, I. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87, 209–219 (1999).
Lozada-Gobilard, S. et al. Environmental filtering predicts plant-community trait distribution and diversity: Kettle holes as models of meta-community systems. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1898–1910 (2019).
Wright, S. Wright S. Evolution in mendelian populations.Genetics 16, 97-159, 1931. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. (1981).
Aavik, T. & Helm, A. Restoration of plant species and genetic diversity depends on landscape-scale dispersal. Restor. Ecol. 26, S92–S102 (2018).
Vasić, F., Paul, C., Strauss, V. & Helming, K. Ecosystem services of kettle holes in agricultural landscapes. Agronomy 10, 1326 (2020).
Noël, F., Machon, N. & Robert, A. Integrating demographic and genetic effects of connections on the viability of an endangered plant in a highly fragmented habitat. Biol. Conserv. 158, 167–174 (2013).
Kayler, Z. E. et al. Ephemeral kettle hole water and sediment temporal and spatial dynamics within an agricultural catchment. Ecohydrology 11, e1929 (2018).
Plue, J. & Cousins, S. A. O. Seed dispersal in both space and time is necessary for plant diversity maintenance in fragmented landscapes. Oikos 127, 780–791 (2018).
Williams, N. M. et al. Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2280–2291 (2010).
Lozada-Gobilard, S. et al. Habitat quality and connectivity in kettle holes enhance bee diversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 319, 107525 (2021).
Van Schmidt, N. D. & Beissinger, S. R. The rescue effect and inference from isolation–extinction relationships. Ecol. Lett. 23, 598–606 (2020).
Savić, B. et al. Assessing the role of kettle holes for providing and connecting amphibian habitats in agricultural landscapes. Land 10, 692 (2021).
Westberg, E. & Kadereit, J. W. Genetic evidence for divergent selection on Oenanthe conioidesand Oe. aquatica(Apiaceae), a candidate case for sympatric speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 113, 50–56 (2014).
Yan, H. Using plant-pollinator networks to identify the floral preferences of four groups of pollinators in the UK. University of Bristol, (2022).
Kleeberg, A., Geppert, M., Schkade, U.-K., Kalettka, T. & Lischeid, G. Sediment cores from kettle holes in NE Germany reveal recent impacts of agriculture. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 1 (2016).
Poiani, K. A. & Carter Johnson, W. Evaluation of the emergence method in estimating seed bank composition of prairie wetlands. Aquat. Bot. 32, 91–97 (1988).
Inglis, P. W., Pappas, M. C. R., Resende, L. V. & Grattapaglia, D. Fast and inexpensive protocols for consistent extraction of high quality DNA and RNA from challenging plant and fungal samples for high-throughput SNP genotyping and sequencing applications. PLoS ONE 13, e0206085 (2018).
Favre-Bac, L., Godé, C. & Arnaud, J.-F. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the fine-leaved water-Dropwort Oenanthe aquatica and the Gypsywort Lycopus europaeus, two farmland remnant wetland species. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 6, 995–998 (2014).
R Core Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. (RStudio, PBC, 2022).
Paradis, E. pegas: An R package for population genetics with an integrated–modular approach. Bioinformatics 26, 419–420 (2010).
Agapow, P.-M. & Burt, A. Indices of multilocus linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol. Notes 1, 101–102 (2001).
Kamvar, Z. N., Brooks, J. C. & Grünwald, N. J. Novel R tools for analysis of genome-wide population genetic data with emphasis on clonality. Front. Genet. 6, 1 (2015).
Rioux Paquette, S. PopGenKit: Useful functions for (batch) file conversion and data resampling in microsatellite datasets. R package version 1.0. (2011).
Goudet, J. hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184–186 (2005).
Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. (2009).
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Edwards, A. W. F. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 233–257 (1967).
Edwards, A. W. F. Distances between populations on the basis of gene frequencies. Biometrics 27, 873–881 (1971).
Jombart, T. adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).
Dray, S., Legendre, P. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Spatial modelling: A comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol. Model. 196, 483–493 (2006).
Tang, Q., Fung, T. & Rheindt, F. E. ResDisMapper: An r package for fine-scale mapping of resistance to dispersal. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 819–831 (2020).
Feldman, B. et al. Distinct lineages and population genomic structure of the coral Pachyseris speciosa in the small equatorial reef system of Singapore. Coral Reefs 41, 575–585 (2022).
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).
Francis, R. M. pophelper: An R package and web app to analyse and visualize population structure. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17, 27–32 (2017).
Wang, J. The computer program structure for assigning individuals to populations: Easy to use but easier to misuse. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17, 981–990 (2017).
Yu, G., Smith, D. K., Zhu, H., Guan, Y. & Lam, T.T.-Y. ggtree: An r package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 28–36 (2017).
Excoffier, L., Laval, G. & Schneider, S. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinforma. 1, 117693430500100000 (2005).
Hedrick, P. W. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59, 1633–1638 (2005).
Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodöhl, P. A. Diversity: An R package for the estimation of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 782–788 (2013).
Piry, S. et al. GENECLASS2: A software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J. Hered. 95, 536–539 (2004).
Paetkau, D., Slade, R., Burden, M. & Estoup, A. Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: A simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol. Ecol. 13, 55–65 (2004).
Rannala, B. & Mountain, J. L. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 9197–9201 (1997).
Falahati-Anbaran, M., Lundemo, S. & Stenøien, H. K. Seed dispersal in time can counteract the effect of gene flow between natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 202, 1043–1054 (2014).
Berry, O., Tocher, M. D. & Sarre, S. D. Can assignment tests measure dispersal?. Mol. Ecol. 13, 551–561 (2004).
Acknowledgements
We thank the landowners for their cooperation during the sampling collection. Katrin Kiemel is thanked for her support during various field campaigns. We also thank Anja Ernst for laboratory assistance. This work was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in the framework of the BioMove Research Training Group (DFG-GRK 2118).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.T. was responsible for conducting the field study as well as the greenhouse and laboratory surveys analyzing data, and interpreting results. S.L.G. contributed to writing the Manuscript, collection of data, and consultation, F.J. and R.T. provided valuable feedback on the theoretical framework of the study and contributed to writing the manuscript, R.T. provided critical feedback on data analyses and interpretation and supervised this project. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tomowski, M., Lozada-Gobilard, S., Jeltsch, F. et al. Recruitment and migration patterns reveal a key role for seed banks in the meta-population dynamics of an aquatic plant. Sci Rep 13, 11269 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37974-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37974-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.