Abstract
Cryptosporidium is a protozoan that causes acute gastroenteritis, abdominal pain, and diarrhea in many vertebrate species, including humans, animals and birds. A number of studies have reported the occurrence of Cryptosporidium in domestic pigeons. Thus, this study aimed to identify Cryptosporidium spp. in samples collected from domestic pigeons, pigeon fanciers, and drinking water, as well as to investigate the antiprotozoal activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on the viability of isolated Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum). Samples were collected from domestic pigeons (n = 150), pigeon fanciers (n = 50), and drinking water (n = 50) and examined for the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. using microscopic and molecular techniques. The antiprotozoal activity of AgNPs was then assessed both in vitro and in vivo. Cryptosporidium spp. was identified in 16.4% of all examined samples, with C. parvum identified in 5.6%. The highest frequency of isolation was from domestic pigeon, rather than from pigeon fanciers or drinking water. In domestic pigeons, there was a significant association between Cryptosporidium spp. positivity and pigeon's age, droppings consistency, housing, hygienic and heath conditions. However, Cryptosporidium spp. positivity was only significantly associated with pigeon fanciers' gender and heath condition. The viability of C. parvum oocysts was reduced using AgNPs at various concentrations and storage times in a descending manner. In an in vitro study, the highest reduction in C. parvum count was observed at the AgNPs concentration of 1000 µg/mL after a 24 h contact time, followed by the AgNPs concentration of 500 µg/mL after a 24 h contact time. However, after a 48 h contact time, a complete reduction was observed at both 1000 and 500 µg/mL concentrations. Overall, the count and viability of C. parvum decreased with increasing the AgNPs concentration and contact times in both the in vitro and in vivo studies. Furthermore, the C. parvum oocyst destruction was time-dependent and increased with increasing the contact time at various AgNPs concentrations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cryptosporidium spp. is an enteric parasite that causes diarrhea in humans, animals, and birds worldwide1,2, resulting in substantial economic losses and public health risk3. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in humans, animals and poultry varies4,5, with symptoms ranging from mild to severe diarrhea or asymptomatic illness, depending on the immune status of the infected host6. There are more than 26 Cryptosporidium spp., with Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum) being the most common zoonotic species that affects humans, animals, and birds7. The fecal–oral route transmits cryptosporidiosis, either directly through contact with infected humans, animals, and birds or indirectly through contaminated water or food with a low infectious dose of 10 oocysts2.
Many birds, including chickens, turkeys, geese, ducks, pigeons, lovebirds, cockatiels, and ostriches, are known to be biological reservoirs of Cryptosporidium spp., particularly C. parvum; and can transmit infection to humans and animals1. Cryptosporidiosis in birds is characterized by respiratory and intestinal symptoms8 and can be spread between birds through the ingestion of oocysts in contaminated environments9. Furthermore, contaminated drinking water with Cryptosporidium oocysts is a major source of infection for humans and livestock, resulting in millions of deaths each year10. Cryptosporidium is able to pass through filtered or unfiltered drinking water systems due to the small size of its oocysts11. Additionally, groundwater supplies can be polluted by the infiltration of contaminated surface waters12.
The diagnosis of Cryptosporidium infection is typically based on microscopic detection of oocysts in fecal, stool, and water samples. However, this method has low sensitivity for determining Cryptosporidium spp.13. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is considered the most popular and sensitive method to differentiate between Cryptosporidium spp.14. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) is also commonly used method for purifying oocysts before DNA extraction, as it effectively eliminates or greatly reduces any inhibitory substances that could interfere with PCR amplification15.
Several factors make Cryptosporidium inactivation difficult in both developed and developing countries including: the high survival rate of Cryptosporidium oocyst in water for more than two years at 20 °C, the resistance to most disinfections such as ultraviolet irradiation, hypochlorous acid, and chloramine16,17, low host specificity18 and low infectious dose (10–132 oocysts)19. Thereby, biosynthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are used as a new alternative for combating C. parvum oocysts by liberating silver ions (Ag+), which cause oxidative stress via the release of reactive oxygen species20,21. The released Ag + ions and nanoparticles can demolish the sporozoites and destruct the oocyst cell wall22. Although the exact mechanism of action of AgNPs against protozoa is not yet fully understood, several studies have documented their antiprotozoal effect on other protozoa, such as Leishmania23,24.
This study was designed to (1) determine the frequency of C. parvum infection in domestic pigeons, pigeon fanciers, and drinking water in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, (2) investigate the potential risk factors associated with C. parvum infection, and (3) explore the antiprotozoal effect of different concentrations and contact times of biosynthesized AgNPs on C. parvum oocyst count and viability.
Materials and methods
Ethical statement
This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Zagazig University (Ref. No.: ZU-IACUC/2/F/211/2022). All procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the ARRIVE criteria. However, procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In addition, written informed consent was obtained from the fanciers for the participation in this study.
Sample collection
Between September 2021 and March 2022, 150 fresh fecal samples were collected from domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica). The pigeons were randomly selected from various households (each with an average of 100–300 pigeons) in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Twenty pigeons were sampled randomly from each household, and each sample consisted of 4–5 fecal deposits. Additionally, samples of stool (n = 50) and drinking water (n = 50) were collected from pigeon fanciers and water sources intended for pigeon and human drinking. Twenty-five liters of water samples were collected in sterile plastic polypropylene containers. All samples were labelled with identification numbers and dates before being sent to the laboratory for further analysis.
Data were collected on the sampled pigeons (including sex, age, food type, hygienic condition, location, fecal consistency, and health status), pigeon fanciers (including age, sex, education level, stool consistency, health condition, knowledge about disease epidemiology, and source of drinking water), and water source types (e.g., surface and underground water).
Microscopical examination
Fecal and stool samples were examined using a wet preparation method (WM) followed by the Sheather’s sugar flotation technique. This technique uses a sucrose solution with a specific gravity of 1.21 to concentrate the sample. Once the sample is concentrated, thin smears were made on glass slides. The slides were air-dried, methanol-fixed, stained with modified Ziehl–Neelsen (MZN) staining, and examined under a light microscope (40X, 100X).
To examine the water samples, 5 L of each sample was filtered using a 142-mm diameter membrane filter with a pore size of 1.2 μm using a vacuum pump. The filtered sample was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 g. The sediment pellet containing oocysts was subjected to sucrose flotation and immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and PCR methods25. One drop of this concentrate was smeared on a slide, stained using the modified Ziehl–Neelsen technique26, and then examined under a microscope (40X, 100X). Microscopically positive samples were stored at − 20 °C for subsequent DNA extraction. The remaining microscopically positive samples were stored in refrigerator in order to evaluate antiprotozoal activity of nanoparticles.
Molecular identification
Frozen Cryptosporidium-positive fecal, stool and water samples were further purified by IMS using the Dynabead anti-Cryptosporidium kit (Dynal Inc, Lake Success, NY, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommended procedures. The IMS-purified oocysts were subsequently captured using a magnetic device (MPC; Dynal Inc, Lake Success, NY, USA) and subjected to five freeze–thaw cycles (− 70 °C for 30 min and 56 °C for 30 min). The QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used for DNA extraction from the purified Cryptosporidium oocysts according to the manufacturer’s guidelines15. The extracted DNA was used for the amplification of the 18S rRNA gene as previously described27. The isolates identified as Cryptosporidium spp. were then subjected to molecular identification of the Actin gene (400 bp) for C. parvum28. A reaction mixture without DNA was used as a negative control and Cryptosporidium spp. and C. parvum were served as positive controls. The PCR products were detected on 2% agarose gel which stained by ethidium bromide.
Antiprotozoal activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles
Collection and purification of oocysts
C. parvum oocysts were isolated and purified from heavily infected samples as previously described29. Samples were examined using the modified MZN technique. Samples containing more than 4–5 C. parvum oocysts per field were selected for analysis and filtered through four layers of gauze. The preserved oocysts were kept for three days at 4 °C before the purification process. The ethyl acetate sedimentation technique (with phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] replacing formalin) was used for oocyst purification, followed by discontinuous sucrose flotation30,31. Potassium dichromate (1:4, v/v) was used to preserve the oocysts at 4 °C for subsequent experiments.
In vitro exposure to biosynthesized AgNPs
A previously prepared AgNPs from Aspergillus niveus, accession number MT319815, were used32. AgNPs were oval, cubic and rod-shaped, with uniformly distributed at 6.49 nm and an absorption peak at 420 nm. The AgNPs had a particle size of 27 nm with various functional groups and a negative charge of 30.4 mv. The Neubauer hemocytometer was used to determine the concentration of C. parvum oocysts. The mean of the four hemocytometer counts of the stock suspension with the dilution factor was calculated after several washes with PBS (to remove potassium dichromate)33. A 10-μL aliquot of oocyst suspension was pipetted between the counting chambers and hemocytometer cover slides and enumerated under a 40X objective using a phase-contrast microscope. The oocysts with a final concentration of 1 × 103/mL were then incubated in sterile PBS (pH 7.4) and an antibiotic (Pen/Strep/Amphotericin B (100 ×), BioWhittaker®, Lonza) suspension (10,000-U Pen/mL, 10,000-μg Strep/mL, and 25-μg Amphotericin B/mL) at room temperature. The purified oocysts were suspended in normal saline and stored at 4 °C for a maximum of 3 days before use. Various concentrations of AgNPs (i.e., 10, 50, 500, and 1000 μg/mL) were added to the calculated oocysts’ suspension to form a total volume of 1 mL.
The count and viability of the treated C. parvum oocysts were determined after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of incubation with AgNPs. The remaining settled oocysts were then gently mixed for 15 min with 2 mL 0.1% eosin stain to detect viability. Viable oocysts were unstained while nonviable oocysts were stained red. C. parvum-positive oocysts were counted before and after exposure to AgNPs according to Suresh and Rehg34, using a hemocytometer slide under a bright-field microscopy, with the use of the following equation:
where C = oocyst count, T = the total number of counted oocysts, D = dilution factor, and W = the volume of tested water sample in (mL).
The minimum lethal concentration (MLC) was the lowest AgNPs concentration leading to the absence of viable C. parvum oocysts35. The test was repeated three times for each AgNPs concentration and each sample.
In vivo infectivity assays
Pathogen-free Swiss Albino mice with an average weight of 27–34 g and aged nine weeks were used in this study. The mice were divided into five groups labelled G1, G2, G3, G4, and G5. Each group contained three mice, and all mice were kept separately in standard conditions. Group G1 was the control group and received C. parvum oocysts without AgNPs. Groups G2, G3, G4, and G5 received C. parvum oocysts treated with different concentrations of AgNPs at different contact times (3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h).
The mice received different concentrations of AgNPs suspension, and the viable oocysts were counted using a hemocytometer36. All mice gavaged with 1000 C. parvum oocysts diluted in 75 μL distilled water with or without AgNPs exposure at the same time. Fresh fecal pellets were individually collected from each mice by applying gentle pressure on their abdomens over the experimental period (i.e., 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days), while counting Cryptosporidium oocysts. All mice were euthanized 10 days after being inoculated. C. parvum infection were then classified as positive or negative for each group based on microscopic examination and molecular identification.
Statistical analysis
The association between Cryptosporidium spp. positivity and potential risk factors was evaluated using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. A two-way analysis of variance was used to identify the variations in AgNPs concentrations and Cryptosporidium oocysts at different contact times. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 16 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX) and a P-value < 0.5 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Cryptosporidium spp. isolation and identification
Cryptosporidium spp. were molecularly identified in 39 (16.9%) of all samples examined and mostly identified in samples from domestic pigeon (n = 29; 19.3%), followed by pigeon fanciers (n = 8; 16%) and water samples (n = 2; 6.7%) (Fig. 1A). C. parvum was molecularly detected in 12 (5.2%) of all samples, including 7 (4.7%) in domestic pigeon, 3 (6%) in pigeon fanciers, and 2 (6.7%) in drinking surface water supplies (Fig. 1B).
Table 1 shows significant association between Cryptosporidium spp. positivity and pigeon's age, droppings consistency, housing, hygienic and heath conditions. However, Cryptosporidium spp. positivity was only significantly associated with pigeon fanciers' gender and health condition.
Antiprotozoal activity of biosynthesized AgNPs
In vitro exposure to biosynthesized AgNPs
The antiprotozoal activity of the biosynthesized AgNPs on the viability of C. parvum oocysts was tested. The results showed that the AgNPs had a significant inhibitory effect on the viability of C. parvum oocysts (Fig. 2). In addition, the effects of storage time on C. parvum treated with biosynthesized AgNPs at different concentrations (i.e., 50, 100, 500, and 1000 µg) were evaluated. Figure 3 illustrates the total count of C. parvum oocysts in the treated samples and the control group at different contact times. A nonsignificant difference in the control samples at different storage times was observed.
The total count of C. parvum oocysts treated with AgNPs at different concentrations in the control group at 0 h was 2.99 ± 0.01. A significant decrease in C. parvum count was observed after 3 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h of storage at concentrations of 500 µg/mL and 1000 µg/mL ((2.77 ± 0.007 and 2.59 ± 0.03), (2.46 ± 0.007 and 2.27 ± 0.02), (2.15 ± 0.03 and 1.92 ± 0.02), and (1.39 ± 0.08 and 1.08 ± 0.08), respectively), whereas no oocysts were detected after 48 h of storage. The time-kill curve for C. parvum treated with AgNPs at different concentrations gradually decreased as the storage time increased, with the MLC of AgNPs being at 500 µg/mL in this study.
In vivo infectivity assays
Table 2 shows that mice in group G3, G4 and G5 infected with C. parvum oocysts treated with AgNPs at different concentrations and storage times had significantly lower C. parvum oocyst counts than those in the control group (G1) and G2. The groups infected with C. parvum exposed to AgNPs at the concentration of 500 µg/mL for 48 h and 1000 µg/mL for 48 h showed no infection, with a 0/3 infection rate.
Discussion
Cryptosporidium is a zoonotic disease that is capable of causing serious public health risks. Several studies have found that domestic pigeons can act as reservoir host for Cryptosporidium, with direct contact between pigeons and fanciers creating favorable conditions for transmission37,38. In current study, Cryptosporidium spp. was identified in 19.3% of pigeon samples with 4.7% of these samples being C. parvum. A similar rate (5.9%) was reported in pigeons in Spain38, while a lower rate (0.82%) was reported in China4. However, higher rates of Cryptosporidium infection in pigeons were found in Bangladesh (50%)39 and Egypt (46.2%)40.
In this study, we assessed number of disease determinants that might be associated with Cryptosporidium spp. infection in domestic pigeons. Results showed that there is significant association between infection and pigeon age, housing, hygienic and health conditions. Previous studies have reported that Cryptosporidium infection were more frequent in young pigeons than adults37,41. The undeveloped immune system in young birds might be the main cause for increasing susceptibility of young birds than adults7. Unhygienic conditions in cages and high stocking density were also identified as risk factors for Cryptosporidium infection9. These findings suggest that it is important to ensure that pigeons have adequate housing and hygiene conditions in order to reduce the risk of infection42.
Regarding pigeon fanciers, Cryptosporidium spp. was detected in 16% of the sample tested in this study, of which 6% were identified as C. parvum. In addition, a strong association was found between Cryptosporidium infection and fanciers’ gender and health condition. Previous studies in human cryptosporidiosis have reported similar isolation rates. For example, Chen, et al.43, found C. parvum infection in 6.9% of tested children in China. Additionally, several studies have found that immunocompromised individuals have high prevalence of cryptosporidiosis than healthy individuals44,45. In this study, all infections were reported in fanciers with low education level, which is in agreement with the findings of Elshahawy and AbouElenien46 who found that individules without formal education are more likely to be infected with cryptosporidiosis than those with formal education.
Regarding drinking water sources, Cryptosporidium spp. has been isolated from surface water only, which is in agreement with the findings of Stokdyk, et al.47, who found that groundwater was free of Cryptosporidium. Simmons III, et al.48 have also detected Cryptosporidium oocytes in surface water samples in North Carolina streams and reservoirs used as sources of drinking water. Other studies have reported Cryptosporidium oocytes in both surface and underground water supplies, but the rate was higher in surface water46,49,50.
Because of the side effects and cost of chemical drugs for water treatment, particularly in the rural areas, the use of natural products for water treatment is needed. In recent years, developing countries have begun to use nanotechnology as an antiprotozoal and antimicrobial51,52,53. Since Cryptosporidium oocysts remain viable in water for up to a year, even in purified drinking water and cause epidemics54. In this study, the antiprotozoal activity of AgNPs against C. parvum oocysts in vitro, and the obtained results were confirmed in an in vivo infectivity assay.
The antiprotozoal activity of AgNPs has been documented in different studies55,56. The findings from the present study are in line with those from previous studies which have found that AgNPs can have a significant inhibitory effect on the viability of C. parvum oocysts22. The highest reduction in count and viability of the C. parvum was observed at the AgNPs concentration of 500 µg/mL and 1000 µg/mL, while the least reduction was noted at the 50 µg/mL concentration. Similar results were obtained by Cameron, et al.22, who have reported that AgNPs at a concentration of 500 μg/mL significantly reduced the viability of C. parvum oocysts. Furthermore, Saad, et al.57 have found that C. parvum oocysts isolated from human and animal feces became inactive after nanoparticle treatment. The inhibitory effects of AgNPs on C. parvum oocysts may be attributed to their small size, which cause them directly diffuse into the cell membrane pores, and cause toxic effects on protozoal cells58. Moreover, Iavicoli, et al.59 have found that AgNPs with smaller diameters seem to be more effective than larger ones.
The MLC of AgNPs in this study was determined to be at a concentration of 500 µg/mL. However, Ahmed, et al.29 reported that 3000 μg/mL was the MLC of Chitosan nanoparticles to kill more than 90% of oocysts. Cryptosporidium had a hard cell wall; so it requires longer contact times with nanoparticles for effective destruction. Similarly, a previous study on the oocyst of Cyclospora cayetanensis required a longer contact time with magnesium nanoparticles to be destructed60. On the other hand, Hassan, et al.61 reported that shorter contact times are recommended for better destruction of C. parvum oocysts (i.e., 30 min at 1 ppm or 1 h at 0.1 ppm concentrations of AgNPs). The difference between our results and other studies could be attributed to the sample type, methodology, and properties of the used nanoparticles.
Conclusions
Cryptosporidium spp. and C. parvum were found in Egyptian domestic pigeons, pigeon fanciers, and drinking water, posing a public health risk. Understanding the transmission mode of Cryptosporidium infection is essential, and proper hygiene and sanitation practices should be implemented. This study provided evidence of the safety and efficacy of biosynthesized AgNPs with reasonable contact times as a new nanoform agent in treating and controlling C. parvum infection in domestic pigeons in farms, drinking water in large-scale water plants, and humans.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Ryan, U. Cryptosporidium in birds, fish and amphibians. Exp. Parasitol. 124, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2009.02.002 (2010).
Zahedi, A., Paparini, A., Jian, F., Robertson, I. & Ryan, U. Public health significance of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in wildlife: Critical insights into better drinking water management. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites wildl. 5, 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.12.001 (2015).
Adam, K. Y., Ismail, A. A., Masri, M. A. & Gameel, A. A. First report and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in humans and animals in Khartoum state, Sudan. Vet. World 12, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.183-189 (2019).
Li, J. et al. Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in captive wildlife at Zhengzhou Zoo, China. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 62, 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12269 (2015).
Oliveira, B. et al. First description of Cryptosporidium parvum in carrier pigeons (Columba livia). Vet. Parasitol. 243, 148–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.06.023 (2017).
Samie, A., Al-Qahtani, A., El Bakri, A. & Ehdaie, B. Challenges and innovative strategies to interrupt Cryptosporidium transmission in resource-limited settings. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-015-0057-8 (2015).
Helmy, Y. A., Krücken, J., Abdelwhab, E.-S.M., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. & Hafez, H. M. Molecular diagnosis and characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in turkeys and chickens in Germany reveals evidence for previously undetected parasite species. PLoS ONE 12, e0177150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177150 (2017).
Quiroz, E. S. et al. An outbreak of cryptosporidiosis linked to a foodhandler. J. Infect. Dis. 181, 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1086/315279 (2000).
Shemshadi, B., Bahadori, S. & Mozafari, A. Study on cryptosporidiosis incidence in broilers in Garmsar region. Iran. Comp. Clin. Path. 20, 143–149 (2011).
Striepen, B. Parasitic infections: Time to tackle cryptosporidiosis. Nature 503, 189–191 (2013).
Toledo, R. D. S. et al. Cryptosporidium spp and Giardia spp in feces and water and the associated exposure factors on dairy farms. PLoS ONE 12, e0175311 (2017).
Rose, J. B. et al. Climate and waterborne disease outbreaks. J. Am. Water Work. Assoc. 92, 77–87 (2000).
Bouzid, M., Hunter, P., Chalmers, R. & Tyler, K. Cryptosporidium pathogenicity and virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00076-12 (2013).
Saki, J. & Foroutan-Rad, M. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in wild rodents of southwestern Iran using 18s rRNA gene nested-PCR-RFLP and sequencing techniques. J. Trop. Med. 2016, 1–6 (2016).
Jiang, J., Alderisio, K. A., Singh, A. & Xiao, L. Development of procedures for direct extraction of Cryptosporidium DNA from water concentrates and for relief of PCR inhibitors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 1135–1141 (2005).
Korich, D. G., Mead, J. R., Madore, M. S., Sinclair, N. A. & Sterling, C. R. Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 1423–1428 (1990).
Montemayor, M., Valero, F., Jofre, J. & Lucena, F. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in raw and treated sewage and river water in north-eastern Spain. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 1455–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02737.x (2005).
Zahedi, A. & Ryan, U. Cryptosporidium–an update with an emphasis on foodborne and waterborne transmission. Res. Vet. Sci. 132, 500–512 (2020).
Okhuysen, P. C., Chappell, C. L., Crabb, J. H., Sterling, C. R. & DuPont, H. L. Virulence of three distinct Cryptospovidium parvum isolates for healthy adults. J. Infect. Dis. 180, 1275–1281 (1999).
Fauss, E., Maccuspie, R., Oyanedel-Craver, V., Smith, J. & Swami, N. Disinfection action of electrostatic versus steric-stabilized silver nanoparticles on E. coli under different water chemistries. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 113C, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.027 (2013).
Kailasa, S., Park, T.-J., Rohit, J. & Koduru, J. Chapter 14—Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles. In Nanoparticles in Pharmacotherapy (ed. Grumezescu, A.M.) 461–484 (William Andrew Publishing, 2019).
Cameron, P. et al. Silver nanoparticles decrease the viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 431–437 (2016).
Allahverdiyev, A. M. et al. Antileishmanial effect of silver nanoparticles and their enhanced antiparasitic activity under ultraviolet light. Int. J. Nanomed. 6, 2705–2714. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S23883 (2011).
Rossi-Bergmann, B., Pacienza-Lima, W., Marcato, P. D., De Conti, R. & Durán, N. Therapeutic potential of biogenic silver nanoparticles in murine cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Nano Res. 20, 89–97.
Mahmoudi, M. R. & Mirzaei, A. Evaluation of immunomagnetic separation and the sucrose flotation methods coupled with immunofluorescence or PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo) cysts in water samples. J. Basic Res. Med. Sci. 2, 41–44 (2015).
Henriksen, S. A. & Pohlenz, J. F. L. Staining of cryptosporidia by a modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique. Acta Vet. Scand. 22, 594 (1981).
Jellison, K. L., Hemond, H. F. & Schauer, D. B. Sources and species of Cryptosporidium oocysts in the Wachusett Reservoir watershed. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 569–575 (2002).
Santín, M. & Zarlenga, D. S. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay to simultaneously distinguish Cryptosporidium species of veterinary and public health concern in cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 166, 32–37 (2009).
Ahmed, S. A., El-Mahallawy, H. S. & Karanis, P. Inhibitory activity of chitosan nanoparticles against Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Parasitol. Res. 118, 2053–2063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06364-0 (2019).
Castro-Hermida, J., Pors, I., Ares-Mazas, E. & Chartier, C. In vitro activity on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst of different drugs with recognized anticryptosporidial efficacy. Rev. Méd. Vét. 155, 453–456 (2004).
Kourenti, C. & Karanis, P. Valuation and applicability of a purification method coupled with nested PCR for the detection of Toxoplasma oocysts in water. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43, 475–481 (2006).
Abou Elez, R. M. et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium isolated from laying hens, table eggs, and humans with respect to antimicrobial activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Animals 11, 3554 (2021).
Finch, G., Daniels, C., Black, E., Schaefer, F. 3rd. & Belosevic, M. Dose response of Cryptosporidium parvum in outbred neonatal CD-1 mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 3661–3665 (1993).
Suresh, P. & Rehg, J. E. Comparative evaluation of several techniques for purification of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from rat feces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34, 38–40 (1996).
Armson, A., Meloni, B. P., Reynoldson, J. A. & Thompson, R. A. Assessment of drugs against Cryptosporidium parvum using a simple in vitro screening method. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 178, 227–233 (1999).
Karanis, P. & Schoenen, D. Biological test for the detection of low concentrations of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in water. Acta Hydrochem. Hydrob. 29, 242–245 (2001).
Refaat, M. A. K., Abdallah, A. E. H., Mohsen, I. A., Hanan, E. M. E. & Wafaa, G. M. Domestic pigeons as a potential hazzard for transmission of some human protozoan parasites. J. Parasite Res. 1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2690-6759.jpar-20-3184 (2020).
Abreu-Acosta, N., Foronda-Rodríguez, P., López, M. & Valladares, B. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium hominis in pigeons (Columba livia). Acta Parasitol. 54, 1–5 (2009).
Kabir, M. H. B. et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium species in poultry in Bangladesh. One Health 9, 100122 (2020).
Nagwa, E., El-Akabawy, L., El-Madawy, R. & Toulan, E. Studies on intestinal protozoa of poultry in Gharbia Governorate. Benha Vet. Med. J. 5, 78–83 (2013).
Liao, C. et al. Molecular investigation of Cryptosporidium in farmed chickens in Hubei Province, China, identifies ‘zoonotic’ subtypes of C. meleagridis. Parasit. Vect. 11, 484 (2018).
Kichou, F., Saghir, F. & El Hamidi, M. Natural Cryptosporidium sp. infection in broiler chickens in Morocco. Avian Pathol. 25, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459608419124 (1996).
Chen, S. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Cryptosporidium infection in children hospitalized for diarrhea in Guangzhou, China. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9597.1000308 (2017).
Youssef, F., Khalil, I., Riddle, M. & Schlett, C. A review of cryptosporidiosis in Egypt. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 38, 9–28 (2008).
Bamaiyi, P., Eliyana, N. & Mohd Redhuan, N. E. Prevalence and risk factors for cryptosporidiosis: Aglobal, emerging, neglected zoonosis. Asian Biomed. 10, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.1004.493 (2016).
Elshahawy, I. & AbouElenien, F. Seroprevalence of Cryptosporidium and risks of cryptosporidiosis in residents of Sothern Egypt: A cross-sectional study. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 12, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-7645.259244 (2019).
Stokdyk, J. P. et al. Cryptosporidium incidence and surface water influence of groundwater supplying public water systems in Minnesota, USA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 3391–3398 (2019).
Simmons, O. D. III., Sobsey, M. D., Heaney, C. D., Schaefer, F. W. III. & Francy, D. S. Concentration and detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in surface water samples by method 1622 using ultrafiltration and capsule filtration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 1123–1127 (2001).
Cho, E. J. et al. A waterborne outbreak and detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in drinking water of an older high-rise apartment complex in Seoul. Korean J. Parasitol. 51, 461–466. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2013.51.4.461 (2013).
Dreelin, E. A., Ives, R. L., Molloy, S. & Rose, J. B. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in surface water: a case study from Michigan, USA to inform management of rural water systems. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 10480–10503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111010480 (2014).
Gaafar, M. R., Mady, R. F., Diab, R. G. & Shalaby, T. I. Chitosan and silver nanoparticles: Promising anti-toxoplasma agents. Exp. Parasitol. 143, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2014.05.005 (2014).
Etewa, S. E. et al. Assessment of spiramycin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles treatment on acute and chronic toxoplasmosis in mice. J. Parasit. Dis. 42, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-017-0973-8 (2018).
Marei, N., Elwahy, A. H. M., Salah, T. A., El Sherif, Y. & El-Samie, E. A. Enhanced antibacterial activity of Egyptian local insects’ chitosan-based nanoparticles loaded with ciprofloxacin-HCl. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 126, 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.204 (2019).
Omarova, A., Tussupova, K., Berndtsson, R. & Kalishev, M. Protozoan parasites in drinking water: A system approach for improved water, sanitation and hygiene in developing countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030495 (2018).
Adeyemi, O. S., Murata, Y., Sugi, T. & Kato, K. Inorganic nanoparticles kill Toxoplasma gondii via changes in redox status and mitochondrial membrane potential. Int. J. Nanomed. 12, 1647–1661. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s122178 (2017).
Ullah, I. et al. Comparative study on the antileishmanial activities of chemically and biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). 3 Biotech 8, 98–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1121-6 (2018).
Saad, A. H. A., Soliman, M. I., Azzam, A. M. & Mostafa, A. B. Antiparasitic activity of silver and copper oxide nanoparticles against Entamoeba histolytica and Cryptosporidium parvum cysts. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 45, 593–602. https://doi.org/10.12816/jesp.2015.96308 (2015).
Chang, Y.-N., Zhang, M., Xia, L., Zhang, J. & Xing, G. The toxic effects and mechanisms of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Materials 5, 2850–2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5122850 (2012).
Iavicoli, I., Leso, V., Fontana, L. & Calabrese, E. Nanoparticle exposure and hormetic dose–responses: An update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030805 (2018).
Hussein, E. M. et al. Antiprotozoal activity of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts. Parasitol. Int. 67, 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2018.06.009 (2018).
Hassan, D., Farghali, M., El-Deek, H., Ossily, N. & Ismail, T. Antiprotozoal activity of silver nanoparticles against Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts: New insights on their feasibility as a water disinfectant. J. Microbiol. Methods 165, 105698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105698 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the participants (pigeon fanciers) who agreed to provide us with information and use their samples in this work.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, data curation, project administration, R.M.A., A.A., H.T., and R.G.A.; formal analysis, R.M.A. and I.E.; writing-review and editing, R.M.A. and I.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Abou Elez, R.M.M., Attia, A.S.A., Tolba, H.M.N. et al. Molecular identification and antiprotozoal activity of silver nanoparticles on viability of Cryptosporidium parvum isolated from pigeons, pigeon fanciers and water. Sci Rep 13, 3109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30270-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30270-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.