Abstract
Storage of human retinal pigment epithelium (hRPE) can contribute to the advancement of cell-based RPE replacement therapies. The present study aimed to improve the quality of stored hRPE cultures by identifying storage medium additives that, alone or in combination, contribute to enhancing cell viability while preserving morphology and phenotype. hRPE cells were cultured in the presence of the silk protein sericin until pigmentation. Cells were then stored for 10 days in storage medium plus sericin and either one of 46 different additives. Individual effects of each additive on cell viability were assessed using epifluorescence microscopy. Factorial design identified promising additive combinations by extrapolating their individual effects. Supplementing the storage medium with sericin combined with adenosine, L-ascorbic acid and allopurinol resulted in the highest cell viability (98.6 ± 0.5%) after storage for three days, as measured by epifluorescence microscopy. Flow cytometry validated the findings. Proteomics identified 61 upregulated and 65 downregulated proteins in this storage group compared to the unstored control. Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated the presence of melanosomes after storage in the optimized medium. We conclude that the combination of adenosine, L-ascorbic acid, allopurinol and sericin in minimal essential medium preserves RPE pigmentation while maintaining cell viability during storage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness in the developed world and is characterized by impairment and loss of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)1. Due to the lack of treatment options for the dry type of AMD, which affects 85% of patients, replacement of the RPE has been proposed as a future therapy for this disease2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Expectations for the application of RPE transplants to treat retinal diseases are high, and several studies have shown that this approach can restore subretinal anatomy and improve visual function2. A recent review by Nommiste et al.12 covers several proof-of-principle studies investigating the efficacy of different cell sources and transplantation techniques. The RPE cells used in these studies are derived from primary human stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells and several other sources, and have been transplanted to the subretinal space by means of suspensions, strips or patches on coated polymers13,14. While the strategies for cell replacement are improving, the production of cell sheets that fulfill the requirements for transplantation is complex15 and will likely lead to centralization of specialized culture laboratories. The ability to store RPE successfully is necessary in order to transport the tissue from the culture laboratories to the transplantation clinics and make widespread use of RPE replacement therapies possible12. An established storage method would not only allow for transportation, but also make quality control and microbiological testing of the tissue possible16. With continued improvement of RPE tissue engineering approaches, and more than 20 million patients suffering from AMD worldwide17, an upcoming need for improved storage and transportation methods for cultured RPE is anticipated. An above-freezing temperature storage system as suggested by our research group circumvents the need for cryoprotectants, which are known to inflict freezing injury to tissues at both high and low cooling rates18,19,20.
After testing nine different storage temperatures between 4 °C and 37 °C, we found that hRPE cultures stored at 4 °C in a storage medium containing 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES)- and sodium bicarbonate-buffered Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) preserved the greatest number of viable cells (unpublished data). An earlier study showed that the addition of 1% sericin to the cell culture medium enhanced hRPE cell maturation, most notably by increasing cell pigmentation21. The MEM storage medium is a defined basal medium that mainly consists of inorganic salts, vitamins and glucose. We therefore investigated the effects of supplementing this medium with many different additives, including sericin to preserve the differentiated state of the cells. The effects of the 46 individual supplements on viability of hRPE cell cultures were analyzed after ten days of storage at 4 °C. Some additives were selected based on their known or proposed effects on viability or antioxidant function in cultures of RPE or other cell types21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32, while others were chosen based on effects demonstrated in pilot experiments. Most of the additives have, to our knowledge, never been tested in the current setting. The effects of a total of 32 different combinations of the five most promising additives were simulated using a factorial design experiment. The single best combination of additives was selected for further study by additional experiments to assess its effects on phenotype and morphology.
Results
Effect of Individual and Combined Storage Medium Additives on Viability of hRPE
hRPE were seeded in complete EpiCM on Nunclon Δ surface plates and cultured for two days before replacing EpiCM with modified DMEM (hereafter named ≪differentiation medium≫) containing 1% sericin for 14 days. The cells had then developed pigmentation as demonstrated earlier21, and were stored for 10 days in storage medium plus sericin and either one of 46 different additives. The control group, containing sericin, was stored without additional additives. Cell survival following 10 days of storage in all 47 experimental groups (N = 3) was assessed by calcein-acetoxymethyl ester (CAM) fluorescence using ImageJ software to measure the culture well area covered by CAM-stained live hRPE cells. The results are presented in Fig. 1. Cells stored in MEM containing 1% sericin served as the control. Control cells covered 73.5 ± 22.3% of the culture well area. In comparison, cells that had not been stored covered 99.2 ± 0.1% of the culture well area. No single storage medium additive contributed to increasing the CAM-stained culture well area significantly compared to the control. One-way ANOVA revealed that two additives significantly reduced cell viability (carnosine and glutathione), while the Student’s t-test revealed that four additives significantly reduced cell viability (carnosine, glutathione, deferroxamine mesylate and protease inhibitor cocktail) compared to the control.
To investigate whether combinations of additives could increase cell viability further, the five additives which provided the largest CAM fluorescence area (adenosine, allopurinol, β-glycerophosphate, L-ascorbic acid and taurine) were selected for factorial design experiments. Normality of the data was confirmed by Design-Expert, as was absence of significant outliers on residuals plots. The data on percentage of cell viability was then power transformed as recommended by the Design-Expert software before subsequent analysis. A significant model including all possible additive combinations was computed by Design-Expert software (Stat-Ease) using ANOVA (P = 0.047). No single additive supplemented individually to the storage medium had a significant impact on cell viability in the factorial design experiments. The combined effects of sericin, adenosine, allopurinol and L-ascorbic acid, however, provided the highest desirability regarding both CAM-stained culture well area and number of dead cells following storage (Figs 2 and 3).
To confirm factorial design results, viability analysis using CAM area calculation was employed for the optimal additive combination (MEM supplemented with sericin, adenosine, allopurinol and L-ascorbic acid). hRPE cells (N = 3) were cultured at 37 °C and stored for three days at 4 °C in the optimal additive combination before being compared to control cells (N = 6) that had not been stored. Viability was similar between the groups, with a mean CAM fluorescence area of 99.2 ± 0.1% for control cells and 98.6 ± 0.5% for stored cells, respectively (Fig. 4A,B).
Validation of Viability Data Using Flow Cytometry
The viability of hRPE stored in the optimal mix (MEM supplemented with sericin, adenosine, allopurinol and L-ascorbic acid) for three days was validated using flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI) staining. PI passes through permeable cell membranes of dead cells and stains double-stranded DNA. PI bound to 3.1 ± 0.5% of control cells and 7.8 ± 2.5% of stored cells (P < 0.05), yielding a viability of 96.8 ± 0.5% and 92.1 ± 2.5%, respectively (Fig. 4C). While the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.03), these results support the CAM fluorescence area viability data showing only a small change in cell loss in cultures stored using the optimal combination of additives.
pH Measurement
pH of the storage medium was assessed using pH indicator paper and demonstrated pH in the physiological area (pH = 7.4).
Morphology of Optimal Combination hRPE
Both light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were performed to investigate the effect of the optimal combination of storage medium additives on the morphology of hRPE. Control cells were cultured to confluence and obtained the characteristic morphology comprising a hexagonal cell shape and cytoplasmic pigmentation (Fig. 5). The same features were observed in hRPE cells that had been stored for three days using the optimal combination of storage medium additives, indicating that hRPE can be stored in this additive combination while retaining a classic RPE morphology.
Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated that the degree of melanization in cells stored in the optimal additive combination maintained or even exceeded that of control cells (Fig. 6A–E), thereby supporting the findings made by light microscopy. Intercellular tight junctions were present both between control cells and between cells stored in the optimal additive combination (Fig. 6B,D). Microvilli were demonstrated in both groups, both by transmission and scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 6A,B,F,G).
Proteomic Analysis of hRPE Using the Optimal Additive Combination
Proteomic analysis was performed to investigate the effect of the optimal combination of storage medium additives on the hRPE proteome. hRPE cells stored in the optimal storage medium combination were compared to control cells that had not been stored. Of 3902 identified proteins, 126 were differentially expressed applying t-test with P < 0.05 (Tables 1 and 2). A total of 65 proteins (1.7%) were downregulated during storage for three days in the optimal additive mix, while 61 proteins (1.6%) were upregulated during storage in the optimal additive mix (Fig. 7). The distribution of differentially expressed proteins was similar between the groups (Fig. 8).
The cytoskeleton-related proteins ezrin and desmoplakin, and perioxiredoxins 2 and 3, important antioxidant enzymes of the cytosol and mitochondria, respectively33, were upregulated during storage. Expression of vinculin and microtubule-associated protein 4 was reduced during storage. Vinculin is a membrane-associated protein that functions as a multiprotein linker to the actin cytoskeleton34, while microtubule-associated protein 4 is involved in crosslinking of microtubules to actin filaments35. The expression levels of several proteins associated with important RPE functions were specifically analyzed. The list of proteins was selected based on their known roles in visual pigment generation, phagocytosis and adhesion of RPE36,37,38,39,40. Only one of the selected proteins important for specific RPE functions had significantly changed regulation in the stored cells compared to the control (Table 3). Tyrosinase was slightly, but significantly downregulated in stored cells compared to control cells (fold change 0.8; P < 0.01).
Discussion
The present study indicates that the storage viability of hRPE cells can be increased by supplementing the serum-free MEM-based storage medium containing sericin with a combination of three additional additives, while maintaining a differentiated morphology and with only slight phenotypic changes. A total of 47 individual additives were studied, including 32 combinations of the five most promising additives using a full-factorial design experiment. Herein, the five most promising storage media additives (adenosine, allopurinol, β-glycerophosphate, L-ascorbic acid and taurine) were investigated simultaneously. Compared to one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) studies, factorial experiments have several advantages41. First, they require less time, material, and number of experiments, making them more cost-effective. Second, they yield better estimates of the effects of each factor because all observations are used to calculate the effect of each individual variable. Third, they reveal interactions between factors and thus permit the exploration of optimal combinations over the entire repertoire of substances. Hence, compared to OFAT studies, which vary only one factor at a time, factorial experiments simultaneously inspecting several factors are far more efficient when analyzing the effect of two or more variables.
The full-factorial experiment revealed that adenosine, allopurinol and L-ascorbic acid together provided the most desirable additive combination with regard to cell viability. This finding was controlled using CAM fluorescence measurements and validated by flow cytometry. The combined effects of these additives on hRPE storage have not been described earlier, but their individual effects on many cellular processes have been widely studied. Adenosine is a purine nucleoside which has been shown to participate in the regulation of inflammatory responses by limiting inflammatory tissue destruction42. Adenosine binds G protein-coupled adenosine receptors43, and A3 receptor activation has been demonstrated to protect retinal cultures against neurodegeneration44. Activation of the ATP receptor P2X7 is known to induce death of retinal ganglion cells, but simultaneous intravitreal injection of an A3 receptor agonist can prevent the P2X7-associated cell death45. P2X7 overactivation results in dysregulated calcium signaling and is involved in the age-related dysfunction and degeneration of RPE cells46. This suggests that overactive purinergic signaling may contribute to the geographic atrophy seen in dry AMD47. The activation of adenosine receptors and inhibition of P2X7 is considered clinically relevant for the prevention of cell death in several eye diseases, including AMD47. Whether the beneficial effect of adenosine on preventing P2X7-associated cell death is responsible for providing increased hRPE cell viability, or other mechanisms are at play, warrants further study.
Allopurinol is a xanthine oxidase inhibitor that reduces the production of uric acid and is being investigated for management of reperfusion injury. It has been shown to prevent postasphyxial changes in newborn pig retinas48 and has been successfully used in the treatment of autoimmune uveitis in an experimental setting49. Allopurinol administered to RPE cell cultures in high doses has been demonstrated to prevent free-radical-induced cell damage50. Its proposed effect on quenching free radicals might have contributed to enhancing cell viability of cultured hRPE cells during storage in the present study.
It has been established that high levels of antioxidant vitamins can significantly reduce the risk of advanced AMD and its associated vision loss in patients with intermediate or advanced AMD51. The addition of ascorbic acid to primary RPE cell cultures in vitro has been demonstrated to provide a dose-related downregulation of early-response proteins that are triggered by oxidative stress52. In a study using the RPE cell line ARPE-19, however, ascorbic acid was not shown to protect the cells from hydroxyl radical induced cell death53. Yet other studies have shown that ascorbic acid supplementation can protect RPE cells from hypoxic damage54 and reduce vision cell loss from damaging light55. However, the latter effect might be attributable to ascorbic acid preventing excessive shedding of rod outer segments upon light exposure56. The effect of ascorbic acid in the present study might be similar to that of allopurinol in that it reduces the oxidative stress burden.
Our research group recently demonstrated that sericin induces melanogenesis of hRPE cells through activation of the NF-κB pathway21. Sericin has been shown to inhibit tyrosinase57, and proteomic analysis in the present study confirmed that tyrosinase expression is slightly reduced in cells stored in the optimal additive combination in the presence of sericin. The expression of other pigment-related proteins (premelanosome protein 17, tyrosinase related protein 1 and tyrosinase related protein 2) was maintained during storage using the optimal additive combination. Tyrosinase is the main rate-limiting melanogenesis enzyme, catalyzing the formation of dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) from L-tyrosine58. However, light microscopy and TEM demonstrated the presence of melanized cells and melanosomes in stored cell cultures. While phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy can determine the presence of melanosomes, these are not satisfactory methods by which to objectively determine the level of pigmentation. Future studies warrant the use of other methods, i.e. spectrophotometry or modified scanning devices as demonstrated by Lane et al.59.
In a study by Vugler et al.60 investigating RPE cells differentiated from human embryonal stem cells (HESC-RPE), a larger number of stage 4 melanosomes were displayed; however, these cells were of a different origin and were cultured under very different conditions than used in the present study. For instance, the HESC-RPE were cultured on Matrigel for five weeks. Polarization was evident with basally oriented nuclei like in our cells, but apical microvilli were more developed in this study than is shown in our cultures. Both the cell source and culture length might be of essence in order to further enhance differentiation61,62,63. Ultrastructure is presented in great detail in a study by Carr et al.64, who demonstrated that co-culture of HESC-RPE with human retina leads to maturation-associated morphological alterations. Herein, the presence of melanosomes, tight junctions and microvilli is demonstrated. Similar findings are made in control cells and cells stored in the optimal additive combination in this study (Fig. 6).
Pyruvate has been shown to induce pigmentation of ARPE-19 cells cultured in DMEM with high glucose61. In our study, the basic storage medium was supplemented with pyruvate, which might have contributed further to the increased pigmentation demonstrated in both the current and earlier studies by our research group. Although several culture protocols using hESCs or iPSCs have successfully produced differentiated and pigmented RPE cells, they are usually more time-consuming62,63. The use of sericin might contribute in shortening the culture period. The focus on the differentiation process is critical, as its efficiency is considered crucial to the economic feasibility of regenerative therapy using RPE cells59.
The expression of the tight junction protein ZO-1 was maintained during storage, as demonstrated by proteomics analysis and transmission electron microscopy. Cultured cells established the classic hexagonal distribution of mature hRPE monolayers. The RPE, being a polarized monolayer, is dependent on functional intercellular tight junctions to maintain high transepithelial resistance, secure cellular barrier function and regulate paracellular permeability65,66,67,68. Hence, the present study confirms earlier findings, but still indicates that hRPE cells can retain features of a mature phenotype when stored in the optimal additive combination.
The cytoskeleton-related proteins ezrin and desmoplakin were upregulated during storage. Ezrin is a cortical cytoskeleton protein which localizes to epithelial microvilli69. Loss of ezrin function as demonstrated in ezrin knockout mice leads to substantial reduction in RPE apical microvilli and retarded photoreceptor development69. Desmoplakin is necessary for the anchoring of keratin at cell-cell contacts70, and thus important for the regulation of desmosomal adhesion strength71. It functions as a tumor suppressor72, and a decrease in desmosomal protein expression is associated with poor prognosis in several cancers73,74,75. Loss-of-function mutations in desmosomal proteins have been associated with clinical syndromes involving the skin, heart, hair and immune system76,77,78,79. Upregulation of these proteins during storage might indicate that stored cells maintain robust cytoskeletal functions.
Third passage hRPE cells were employed in this study. The increased tendency of epithelial to mesenchymal transition with increasing passages of RPE cells has been demonstrated by Grisanti et al. They showed a large disparity between passage 2 RPE and passage 10 RPE, where cells of the higher passages transdifferentiate and lose differentiated RPE properties80. While there is a wide consensus regarding the advantages of using early-passage RPE cells to avoid this phenomenon in culture, an exact passage number has not been defined. In a study by Ganti et al. investigating vitreous modulation of gene expression in low-passage hRPE, cells from passages 3–6 were termed “early-passage”81. Based on the observed benefits of early passage cell lines, we selected third passage hRPE cells for this study.
In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that the storage medium additive combination of sericin, adenosine, allopurinol and L-ascorbic acid successfully maintains hRPE cell viability during storage while preserving the characteristic hRPE morphology and proteome. The effects of the individual additives are not thoroughly understood, but previous research points to free radical scavenging mechanisms as possible explanations for these findings.
Future studies should investigate the effect of increased storage duration on hRPE cells in the optimal combination medium, and ideally expand the scope to RPE derived from different sources, including primary human stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. This could provide valuable knowledge when establishing a storage protocol for clinical use.
Methods
Supplies
Primary hRPE and complete epithelial cell medium (EpiCM) were purchased from ScienCell Research Laboratories (San Diego, CA). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (high glucose, with pyruvate; hereafter named DMEM), Minimal Essential Medium, heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), N1 growth supplement, taurine, triiodothyronine, non-essential amino acids, glutamine-penicillin-streptomycin, hydrocortisone, propidium iodide (PI), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Nunclon Δ surface plates, pipettes and other routine plastics were purchased from VWR International (West Chester, PA). The calcein-acetoxymethyl ester (CAM)/ethidium homodimer 1 (EH-1) viability kit was purchased from Invitrogen. The 47 additives used in the study are listed in Supplementary Information, Table S1.
Culture and Preparation of Cells
Third passage hRPE were seeded (20,000 cells/cm2) in complete EpiCM on 96-well Nunclon Δ surface plates and cultured under routine conditions of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After two days, EpiCM was replaced with modified DMEM (hereafter named «differentiation medium») containing 4.5 g/L glucose, pyruvate, 1% sericin, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were then cultured for 14 days in differentiation medium until pigmentation, as demonstrated in an earlier study21. The culture medium was changed every two or three days.
Storage of hRPE cells
Cells were cultured in the differentiation medium for 14 days, until cells were confluent and >20% of cells were pigmented as visually determined by phase contrast microscopy. The differentiation medium was then removed and the cultures were rinsed with PBS before addition of storage medium. The storage medium consisted of 0.3 mL MEM, 25 mM 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 22.3 mM sodium bicarbonate, 50 µg/mL gentamycin, and 1% sericin. A total of 46 different additives were individually supplemented to the storage medium and sterile-filtered (pore size 0.2 μm) before being added to the culture wells (N = 3) using a Biomek® 4000 Laboratory Automation Workstation (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA). All cultures were stored at 4 °C for ten days, without change or addition of storage medium. The storage containers were custom-built as reported elsewhere82. pH measurements of the storage medium were performed using pH indicator paper.
Viability Analysis using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
Cell viability was analyzed after 10 days of storage by incubating the stored cells with PBS containing 1.0 μM CAM and 1.0 μM EH-1 for 30 min. CAM is enzymatically cleaved into the green fluorescent calcein inside living cells. EH-1 is a membrane-impermeable dye that binds to DNA of dead cells. Area of fluorescence was calculated for all additive groups using epifluorescence microscopy and custom-made macros with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). In detail, photomicrographs were captured at 200x magnification at five predetermined locations in each culture well using a Nikon Eclipse Ti fluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) with a DS-Qi1 black-and-white camera (Nikon Instruments) and a motorized microscope stage. Identical exposure length and gain were used for all compared groups, while keeping the image brightness within the camera’s dynamic range.
ImageJ software was used to subtract unevenly transmitted light from all 16-bit photomicrographs using the “Subtract Background” -command. All photomicrographs were converted to binary photos before the “Area Fraction” -command was used to measure the culture well area covered by CAM-stained cells. The number of EH-1 stained nuclei was automatically counted using the “Analyze Particles” -command (Fig. 9).
Factorial Design
A factorial design experiment is a complex statistical design offering the possibility to study more than one factor at a time by creating a simulation of combined factor effects. Factorial design using Design-Expert (Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) was employed to identify the most promising combination of storage medium additives. The five best additives from the viability analysis were included as independent variables (adenosine, allopurinol, β-glycerophosphate, L-ascorbic acid and taurine), with area of CAM fluorescence and the number of dead cells as the two dependent variables. The combined results of two end points were studied. However, the «Importance» tool was employed to set relative priorities for the two variables. The importance of viability (CAM fluorescence area) was emphasized over cell death (number of dead cells). The two-level full-factorial design included replicates of all 32 possible combinations of the five additives. Data were fitted to a full quadratic model. ANOVA was used to calculate the adjusted significance of both models (viability and death) in Design-Expert (P = 0.0047 and P = 0.036, respectively).
Flow Cytometry
Flow cytometry was used to validate the viability results. Cells were cultured in T25 cell culture flasks following the aforementioned protocol. Control cells (N = 3) and cells stored in the optimal additive combination (1% sericin, 5 mmol/L adenosine, 50 μg/mL L-ascorbic acid and 1 mM allopurinol) (N = 3) for three days were compared. Propidium iodide (PI), which binds to double-stranded DNA of dead cells, was added to the culture medium of both culture groups at a concentration of 2.5 μg/300 μL sample and cells were returned to the incubator for 15 minutes. Cells were then rinsed with PBS, trypsinized for 2–3 minutes, then washed and re-suspended in ice-cold HBSS +4% FBS. Samples were kept on ice and analyzed using the BD Accuri C6 bench top flow cytometer. PI is excited by the 588 nm laser and is detected in filter 616//23 (FL3).
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Both unstored cultures and samples of hRPE stored for three days in MEM storage medium with the optimal additive combination (1% sericin, 5 mmol/L adenosine, 50 μg/mL L-ascorbic acid and 1 mM allopurinol) were processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis as described earlier83. In essence, a Leica Ultracut Ultramicrotome (Leixa, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to cut ultrathin sections, which were examined using a CM120 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). A one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post-hoc comparisons was used for statistical evaluation of the viability results. The Student’s t-test was used to compare two groups. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.
Proteomics
The proteome of hRPE cells stored in the optimal storage medium combination was analyzed and compared to control cells that had not been stored. The proteome analyses were performed as previously described84. Briefly, the proteins of cell lysates were digested in-solution with trypsin. The generated peptides were analyzed by LC-MS using a nano-UHPLC connected to a Q Exactive mass spectrometer. Proteins were identified using the Mascot search engine and Scaffold software (version Scaffold_4.7.3, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) was used for further data analysis and label-free quantification. Scaffold was used to validate MS/MS based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95.0% probability by the Peptide Prophet algorithm85 with Scaffold delta-mass correction. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 99.0% probability and contained at least 2 identified peptides. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm86. Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. Distribution of protein functions in hRPE before and after storage was determined using Scaffold software with annotations downloaded from the NCBI web database.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Jager, R. D., Mieler, W. F. & Miller, J. W. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 358, 2606–2617 (2008).
da Cruz, L., Chen, F. K., Ahmado, A., Greenwood, J. & Coffey, P. RPE transplantation and its role in retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 26, 598–635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.001 (2007).
Lund, R. D. et al. Subretinal transplantation of genetically modified human cell lines attenuates loss of visual function in dystrophic rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 9942–9947, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171266298 (2001).
McGill, T. J. et al. Preservation of vision following cell-based therapies in a model of retinal degenerative disease. Vision Res 44, 2559–2566, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.025 (2004).
Sheridan, C. M. et al. Replacement of the RPE monolayer. Eye 23, 1910–1915, https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.420 (2009).
Yaji, N., Yamato, M., Yang, J., Okano, T. & Hori, S. Transplantation of tissue-engineered retinal pigment epithelial cell sheets in a rabbit model. Biomaterials 30, 797–803, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.045 (2009).
Falkner-Radler, C. I. et al. Human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) transplantation: outcome after autologous RPE-choroid sheet and RPE cell-suspension in a randomised clinical study. Br J Ophthalmol 95, 370–375, https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.176305 (2011).
Coffey, P. J. et al. Long-term preservation of cortically dependent visual function in RCS rats by transplantation. Nat Neurosci 5, 53–56, https://doi.org/10.1038/nn782 (2002).
Wang, S., Lu, B., Wood, P. & Lund, R. D. Grafting of ARPE-19 and Schwann cells to the subretinal space in RCS rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 46, 2552–2560 (2005).
Zhang, T. et al. Photoreceptors repair by autologous transplantation of retinal pigment epithelium and partial-thickness choroid graft in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50, 2982–2988 (2009).
Sauve, Y., Pinilla, I. & Lund, R. D. Partial preservation of rod and cone ERG function following subretinal injection of ARPE-19 cells in RCS rats. Vision Res 46, 1459–1472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.11.009 (2006).
Nommiste, B. et al. Stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium transplantation for treatment of retinal disease. Prog Brain Res 231, 225–244, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.003 (2017).
Ramsden, C. M. et al. Stem cells in retinal regeneration: past, present and future. Development 140, 2576–2585, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.092270 (2013).
Ramsden, C., da Cruz, L. & Coffey, P. J. Stemming the Tide of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: New Therapies for Old Retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57, ORSFb1–ORSFb3 (2016).
Ahmad, S., Osei-Bempong, C., Dana, R. & Jurkunas, U. The culture and transplantation of human limbal stem cells. J Cell Physiol 225, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22251 (2010).
Utheim, T. P. et al. Sterility control and long-term eye-bank storage of cultured human limbal epithelial cells for transplantation. Br J Ophthalmol 93, 980–983, https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.149591 (2009).
Chopdar, A., Chakravarthy, U. & Verma, D. Age related macular degeneration. BMJ 326, 485–488 (2003).
Pegg, D. E. The History and Principles of Cryopreservation. Semin Reprod Med. 20, 5–13 (2002).
Wang, A. W., Zhang, H., Ikemoto, I., Anderson, D. J. & Loughlin, K. R. Reactive oxygen species generation by seminal cells during cryopreservation. Urology 49, 921–925 (1997).
Honda, S., Weigel, A., Hjelmeland, L. M. & Handa, J. T. Induction of telomere shortening and replicative senescence by cryopreservation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282, 493–498, https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.4585 (2001).
Eidet, J. R. et al. The Silk-protein Sericin Induces Rapid Melanization of Cultured Primary Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells by Activating the NF-kappaB Pathway. Sci Rep 6, 22671, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22671 (2016).
Tsao, L.-I. & Su, T.-P. Hibernation-induction peptide and cell death: [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]enkephalin blocks Bax-related apoptotic processes. European Journal of Pharmacology 428, 3 (2001).
Vecchio, L. et al. DADLE induces a reversible hibernation-like state in HeLa cells. Histochem Cell Biol 125, 193–201, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-005-0085-x (2006).
Radtke, C. et al. TRPV channel expression in human skin and possible role in thermally induced cell death. J Burn Care Res 32, 150–159, https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318203350c (2011).
Mukherjee, P. K., Marcheselli, V. L., Serhan, C. N. & Bazan, N. G. Neuroprotectin D1: a docosahexaenoic acid-derived docosatriene protects human retinal pigment epithelial cells from oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 8491–8496, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402531101 (2004).
Antony, R., Lukiw, W. J. & Bazan, N. G. Neuroprotectin D1 Induces Dephosphorylation of Bcl-xL in a PP2A-dependent Manner during Oxidative Stress and Promotes Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cell Survival. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 285, 8, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.095232 (2010).
Mansoor, S. et al. Inhibition of apoptosis in human retinal pigment epithelial cells treated with benzo(e)pyrene, a toxic component of cigarette smoke. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51, 2601–2607, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4121 (2010).
King, R. E., Kent, K. D. & Bomser, J. A. Resveratrol reduces oxidation and proliferation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells via extracellular signal-regulated kinase inhibition. Chem Biol Interact 151, 143–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2004.11.003 (2005).
Pintea, A. et al. Antioxidant effect of trans-resveratrol in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 27, 315–321, https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2010.0144 (2011).
Sheu, S. J., Liu, N. C. & Chen, J. L. Resveratrol protects human retinal pigment epithelial cells from acrolein-induced damage. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 26, 231–236, https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2009.0137 (2010).
Dajas, F. Life or death: neuroprotective and anticancer effects of quercetin. J Ethnopharmacol 143, 383–396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.07.005 (2012).
Kook, D. et al. The protective effect of quercetin against oxidative stress in the human RPE in vitro. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 49, 1712–1720, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0477 (2008).
Chidlow, G., Wood, J. P., Knoops, B. & Casson, R. J. Expression and distribution of peroxiredoxins in the retina and optic nerve. Brain Struct Funct 221, 3903–3925, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1135-3 (2016).
DeMali, K. A., Barlow, C. A. & Burridge, K. Recruitment of the Arp2/3 complex to vinculin: coupling membrane protrusion to matrix adhesion. J Cell Biol 159, 881–891, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200206043 (2002).
Mohan, R. & John, A. Microtubule-associated proteins as direct crosslinkers of actin filaments and microtubules. IUBMB Life 67, 395–403, https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1384 (2015).
Strauss, O. The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol Rev 85, 845–881, https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00021.2004.-Located (2005).
Smith-Thomas, L. et al. Human ocular melanocytes and retinal pigment epithelial cells differ in their melanogenic properties in vivo and in vitro. Curr Eye Res 15, 1079–1091 (1996).
Rizzolo, L. J. Development and Role of Tight Junctions in the Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Int Rev Cytol. 258, 195–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-7696(07)58004-6 (2007).
Lu, F., Yan, D., Zhou, X., Hu, D.-N. & Qu, J. Expression of melanin-related genes in cultured adult human retinal pigment epithelium and uveal melanoma cells. Mol Vis 13, 2066–2072 (2007).
Tamiya, S., Liu, L. & Kaplan, H. J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells initiated upon loss of cell-cell contact. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 51, 2755–2763, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4725 (2010).
Czitrom, V. One-Factor-at-a-Time Versus Designed Experiments. Amer Statist. 53, 126-131 (1999).
Haskó, G. Adenosine: an endogenous regulator of innate immunity. Trends in Immunology 25, 33–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2003.11.003 (2004).
Fredholm, B. B., AP, I. J., Jacobson, K. A., Linden, J. & Muller, C. E. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors–an update. Pharmacol Rev 63, 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.110.003285 (2011).
Galvao, J. et al. Adenosine A3 receptor activation is neuroprotective against retinal neurodegeneration. Exp Eye Res 140, 65–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.08.009 (2015).
Hu, H. et al. Stimulation of the P2X7 receptor kills rat retinal ganglion cells in vivo. Exp Eye Res 91, 425–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2010.06.017 (2010).
Yang, D. et al. Activation of P2X Receptors Induces Apoptosis in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52, 1522-1530, https://doi.org/10.1167/ (2011).
Reichenbach, A. & Bringmann, A. Purinergic signaling in retinal degeneration and regeneration. Neuropharmacology 104, 194–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.05.005 (2016).
Chemtob, S., Roy, M.-S., Abran, D., Fernandez, H. & Varma, D. R. Prevention of Postasphyxial Increase in Lipid Peroxides and Retinal Function Deterioration in the Newborn Pig by Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase Activity and Free Radical Generation. Pediatr Res 33, 336–340 (1993).
Augustin, A. J., Loeffler, K. U., Sekundo, W., Grus, F. H. & Lutz, J. Effects of systemically applied allopurinol and prednisolone on experimental autoimmune uveitis. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237, 508–512 (1999).
Augustin, A. J., Grus, F. H. & Hunt, S. Effects of allopurinol on free-radical-induced reduction of the proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells. Doc Ophthalmol 93, 231–236 (1997).
AREDS., A. Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial of High-Dose Supplementation With Vitamins C and E, Beta Carotene, and Zinc for Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Vision Loss: AREDS Report No. 8. Arch Ophthal 119, 1417–1436 (2001).
Yin, J., Thomas, F., Lang, J. C. & Chaum, E. Modulation of oxidative stress responses in the human retinal pigment epithelium following treatment with vitamin C. J Cell Physiol 226, 2025–2032, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22532 (2011).
Zeitz, O., Schlichting, L., Richard, G. & Strauss, O. Lack of antioxidative properties of vitamin C and pyruvate in cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 276–281, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0384-5 (2007).
Castillo, M. et al. Effects of Hypoxia on Retinal Pigmented Epithelium Cells: Protection by Antioxidants. Ophthalmic Res 34, 338–342, https://doi.org/10.1159/000067050 (2002).
Organisciak, D. T., Jiang, Y.-L., Wang, H.-M. & Bicknell, I. The Protective Effect of Ascorbic Acid in Retinal Light Damage of Rats Exposed to Intermittent Light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31, 1195–1202 (1990).
Blanks, J. C., Pickford, M. S. & Organisciak, D. T. Ascorbate Treatment Prevents Accumulation of Phagosomes in RPE in Light Damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33, 2814–2821 (1992).
Kato, N. et al. Silk protein, sericin, inhibits lipid peroxidation and tyrosinase activity. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 62, 145–147 (1998).
Reinisalo, M., Putula, J., Mannermaa, E., Urtti, A. & Honkakoski, P. Regulation of the human tyrosinase gene in retinal pigment epithelium cells: the significance of transcription factor orthodenticle homeobox 2 and its polymorphic binding site. Mol Vis 18, 38–54 (2012).
Lane, A. et al. Engineering efficient retinal pigment epithelium differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 3, 1295–1304, https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2014-0094 (2014).
Vugler, A. et al. Elucidating the phenomenon of HESC-derived RPE: anatomy of cell genesis, expansion and retinal transplantation. Exp Neurol 214, 347–361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.007 (2008).
Ahmado, A. et al. Induction of differentiation by pyruvate and DMEM in the human retinal pigment epithelium cell line ARPE-19. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52, 7148–7159 (2011).
Klimanskaya, I. et al. Derivation and Comparative Assessment of Retinal Pigment Epithelium from Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using Transcriptomics. Cloning and Stem Cells 6, 217–245 (2004).
Hirami, Y. et al. Generation of retinal cells from mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Neurosci Lett 458, 126–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.04.035 (2009).
Carr, A. J. et al. Molecular characterization and functional analysis of phagocytosis by human embryonic stem cell-derived RPE cells using a novel human retinal assay. Mol Vis 15, 283–295 (2009).
Sonoda, S. et al. A protocol for the culture and differentiation of highly polarized human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Nat Protoc 4, 662–673, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.33 (2009).
Marmor, M. F. Mechanisms of fluid accumulation in retinal edema. Doc. Ophthalmol 97, 239–249 (1999).
Ablonczy, Z. et al. Human retinal pigment epithelium cells as functional models for the RPE in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52, 8614–8620 (2011).
Ablonczy, Z. & Crosson, C. E. VEGF modulation of retinal pigment epithelium resistance. Exp. Eye Res. 85, 762–771, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2007.08.010 (2007).
Bonilha, V. L., Rayborn, M. E., Saotome, I., McClatchey, A. I. & Hollyfield, J. G. Microvilli defects in retinas of ezrin knockout mice. Exp Eye Res 82, 720–729, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2005.09.013 (2006).
Hobbs, R. P. & Green, K. J. Desmoplakin regulates desmosome hyperadhesion. J Invest Dermatol 132, 482–485, https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2011.318 (2012).
Huen, A. C. et al. Intermediate filament-membrane attachments function synergistically with actin-dependent contacts to regulate intercellular adhesive strength. J Cell Biol 159, 1005–1017, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200206098 (2002).
Yang, L. et al. Desmoplakin acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibition of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in human lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 33, 1863–1870, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgs226 (2012).
Papagerakis, S. et al. Altered desmoplakin expression at transcriptional and protein levels provides prognostic information in human oropharyngeal cancer. Hum Pathol 40, 1320–1329, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.02.002 (2009).
Alazawi, W. O., Morris, L. S., Stanley, M. A., Garrod, D. R. & Coleman, N. Altered expression of desmosomal components in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Virchows Arch 443, 51–56, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-003-0771-9 (2003).
Hamidov, Z. et al. Reduced expression of desmocollin 2 is an independent prognostic biomarker for shorter patients survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 64, 990–994, https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200099 (2011).
Carvajal-Huerta, L. Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma with woolly hair and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Acad Dermatol 39, 481–421 (1998).
Norgett, E. E. et al. Recessive mutation in desmoplakin disrupts desmoplakin-intermediate filament interactions and causes dilated cardiomyopathy, woolly hair and keratoderma. Hum Mol Genet. 9 (2000).
Antonov, N. K. et al. Early-onset heart failure, alopecia, and cutaneous abnormalities associated with a novel compound heterozygous mutation in desmoplakin. Pediatr Dermatol 32, 102–108, https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12484 (2015).
McAleer, M. A. et al. Severe dermatitis, multiple allergies, and metabolic wasting syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the N-terminal plakin domain of desmoplakin. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 136, 1268–1276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.002 (2015).
Grisanti, S. & Guidry, C. Transdifferentiation of Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells From Epithelial to Mesenchymal Phenotype. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 36, 391–405 (1995).
Ganti, R., Hunt, R. C., Parapuram, S. K. & Hunt, D. M. Vitreous modulation of gene expression in low-passage human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48, 1853–1863, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0198 (2007).
Pasovic, L. et al. Optimization of Storage Temperature for Cultured ARPE-19 Cells. J Ophthalmol 2013, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/216359 (2013).
Raeder, S. et al. Effect of limbal explant orientation on the histology, phenotype, ultrastructure and barrier function of cultured limbal epithelial cells. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85, 377–386, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00873.x (2007).
Tran, T. T., Bollineni, R. C., Strozynski, M., Koehler, C. J. & Thiede, B. Identification of Alternative Splice Variants Using Unique Tryptic Peptide Sequences for Database Searches. J Proteome Res. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00126 (2017).
Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical Statistical Model To Estimate the Accuracy of Peptide Identifications Made by MS/MS and Database Search. Anal. Chem 74, 5383–5392 (2002).
Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem 75, 4646–4658 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.P., T.P.U., C.J. and J.R.E. supervised the project. L.P., S.R., A.Z.K., B.T. and J.R.E. performed the experiments. L.P., S.R., A.Z.K., B.T., E.M. and J.R.E. analyzed the data. L.P., T.P.U., J.P.B. and J.R.E. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
There is a competing financial interest. A patent application based on results obtained in this study has been filed. There are none non-financial competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pasovic, L., Utheim, T.P., Reppe, S. et al. Improvement of Storage Medium for Cultured Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Using Factorial Design. Sci Rep 8, 5688 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24121-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24121-8
This article is cited by
-
Determining the optimal stage for cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.