Article | Open

A New Pedicled Internal Mammary Osteomyocutaneous Chimeric Flap (PIMOC) for Salvage Head and Neck Reconstruction: Anatomic Study and Clinical Application

  • Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 12960 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13428-7
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Well-vascularized composite tissue offers improved outcomes for complex head and neck reconstruction. Patients with vessel-depleted necks and failed reconstructions require alternative reconstructive options. We describe a pedicled internal mammary artery osteomyocutaneous chimeric flap (PIMOC) for salvage head and neck reconstruction. Bilateral dissections of 35 fresh cadavers were performed to study individual tissue components and vascular pedicles to develop the PIMOC technique. The flap was then utilized in a series of patients with vessel-depleted neck anatomy. The PIMOC was dissected bilaterally in all cadavers and there were no statistical differences in vascular pedicle caliber or length with regards to laterality or gender. Five patients subsequently underwent this procedure. The flaps included a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous component and a 6th or 7th rib with adjacent muscle and skin to restore bone defects, internal lining, and external coverage. All donor sites were closed primarily. There were no flap losses and all patients gained improvements in facial contour, speech and swallow. Although technically complex, the PIMOC is reproducible and provides a safe and reliable option for salvage head and neck reconstruction. The harvest of the 6th or 7th rib and rectus abdominis muscle renders an acceptable donor site.


Tertiary head and neck reconstruction has become more frequent with improvements in oncologic treatment1,2. The frozen, vessel-depleted neck is a challenge for the reconstructive surgery secondary to osteoradionecrosis, tissue fibrosis, volume loss, and contour deformity. Patients experience poor quality of life with chronic wounds and severe functional impairments, with few or no feasible reconstructive options3,4,5,6.

Although free tissue transfer is the gold standard for these complex head and neck reconstructions7, absent recipient vessels and scarce loco-regional flap options demand unusual techniques, some beyond customary free flap transfer. The literature describes complex procedures like distant vessel mobilization, vein grafts, AV loops, and distant pedicled flaps, with poor outcomes8,9,10,11,12,13.

As an alternative, the internal mammary vessels can serve as recipient for free tissue transfer or as pedicled axial flaps14,15,16,17,18. After anatomic cadaver study, we hypothesized that the internal mammary vessels could be used to develop an innovative pedicled flap for complex head and neck reconstruction.

This article describes research from the cadaver to the clinical setting for the application of a new Pedicled Internal Mammary Osteomyocutaneous Chimeric Flap (PIMOC) technique for head and neck reconstruction.


Anatomic study

Thirty-five fresh cadavers were used to study the anatomy of the neck, chest, and abdominal vessels to standardize the PIMOC technique. We designed individual tissue components, each supplied by their own vascular pedicle originating from a single internal mammary artery. The flap included the internal mammary artery (IMA), musculophrenic (MP) artery, 6th and 7th intercostal (IC) arteries, superficial superior epigastric perforator (SSEP), deep superior epigastric artery (DSEA), and deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA). Vessel length and caliber were measured using a digital caliper. Photographic analysis was performed using the Image J software from the Research Services Branch, National Mental Health Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

To harvest the PIMOC, we accessed the IMA pedicle through an inverted L sternotomy, with the superior transverse osteotomy at the level of the ipsilateral first intercostal space. We dissected the internal mammary pedicle from the posterior costosternal synchondroses and transversus thoracis muscle and ligated the second to fifth intercostal branches. We isolated the distal bifurcation of the internal mammary into the musculophrenic artery and the DSEA. The musculophrenic artery originates from the 6th and 7th intercostal arteries to supply the rib and the DSEA supplies the vertical rectus abdominis muscle flap (VRAM). In the upper abdomen, the SSEP from the deep superior epigastric vessels emerges from the anterior rectus fascia 4 to 8 cm from the xiphoid process, and supplies an ipsilateral oblique skin island that can be individually harvested and included in the flap19,20. Perforator position, skin island orientation and dimensions were observed with intra-arterial dye studies.

Rib dissection was completed from inside the pleural cavity. The final PIMOC composition included the IMA pedicle, the 6th or 7th rib with a slip of adjacent intercostal, serratus, or external oblique muscle, thoracic skin, and the VRAM (Fig. 1). The PIMOC was dissected en block and pivoted at the inferior border of the first rib to reach the head and neck region. Details of the PIMOC harvest in the cadaver is shown in Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1

PIMOC cadaver dissection. (A) The IMA pedicle gives rise to the intercostal arteries and bifurcates distally into the musculophrenic (MP) artery and the deep superior epigastric artery (DSEA). The DSEA anastamoses with the DIEA after supplying the rectus abdominis. The 6th and 7th ribs are supplied by the MP and individual intercostal arteries. (B) The PIMOC with its IMA pedicle, osteomyocutaneous components including the 6th and 7th ribs (1), and myocutaneous vertical rectus abdominis component (2).

Variable normatives were tested with Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Quantitative variables were presented in minimum, maximum and mean with standard deviation. Categorical data were compared using Students’s t-test, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann-Whittney’s U-test, as appropriate. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

Clinical Cases

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of São Paulo Medical Center. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. From July 2012 to June 2014, we selected five frozen-neck male patients with ages ranging from 31 to 68 to undergo head and neck reconstruction utilizing the PIMOC. Patients were counseled on the surgical risks. Informed consent for the surgical procedure and for publication of identifying information/images was obtained. They underwent selective medical work-up for surgical risk stratification.

Inclusion criteria

  • Vessel-depleted neck anatomy evidenced by computed tomography angiography (CTA);

  • Radiation-induced tissue necrosis or fibrosis;

  • Complex defect including mucosa, soft tissue, bone and skin;

  • Scarce loco-regional or free flap options;

Exclusion criteria

  • Adequate recipient neck vessels for reliable free tissue transfer;

  • Suitable loco-regional flap options;

  • Poor ventilatory status;

  • Previous use of both internal mammary vessels for cardiac revascularization, or proven ischemic cardiac condition;

  • Refusal of the terms and conditions for the proposed technique.

Surgical Technique

Prior to PIMOC dissection, we explored the neck vessels viability and confirmed a lack of vessel patency suitable for safe microsurgical tissue transfer. The PIMOC was then harvested as described in the cadaver study, with one exception. In the cadaveric dissections, the rib cartilage was included in the flap to create a versatile chimeric design in order to expand our reconstructive options. In the clinical setting, costal cartilages were not included in the flap because the mandible defects required bony reconstruction only. Costal cartilage was therefore preserved to prevent undue donor site morbidity. The 6th or 7th rib osteomyocutaneous component was selected based on vessel caliber and ease of pedicle dissection. The internal mammary pedicle was pivoted at the inverted L osteotomy, rotated around the first rib and clavicle, and positioned within the loose subcutaneous tissue at least 3 cm away from the tracheostomy (Fig. 2). Final inset with bone fixation and multi-layered closure was performed.

Figure 2
Figure 2

PIMOC surgical technique. (A) Exposure of the mediastinum through an inverted L sternotomy incision and dissection of the IMA pedicle (blue arrow). The VRAM (1) is supplied by the DSEA (yellow arrow). The osteomyocutaneous component (2) contains the 7th rib (*) in this case and is supplied by both the musculophrenic and intercostal arteries (green arrow). (B) Rotation of the PIMOC cephalad. The pivot point of the IMA pedicle is at the lower margin of the first rib (white arrow). (C) Flap inset. The IMA pedicle positioned within the loose subcutaneous tissue at least 3 cm from the tracheostomy site (black arrow). The rib osteomyocutaneous component was used for reconstruction of the mandible and oral lining, and the VRAM component was used for external coverage.

The donor site was closed addressing the thoracic cavity and the abdomen separately. For thoracic cavity closure, polypropylene mesh was used to span the rib defect overlying the exposed pleural cavity. The mesh was sutured to the periosteum along the inferior border of the superior rib resection, the superior border of the inferior rib resection, and the medial and lateral remaining rib segments. A thoracic tube was placed in the pleural cavity and exited caudal to the rib resection, along the mid axillary line. Primary closure of the overlying anterior serratus and external oblique muscles, and skin was performed to cover the mesh. The inverted L sternotomy was securely repaired with wire fixation.

After harvest of the VRAM and the SSEP skin island based on pinch test, the abdominal defect was primarily closed by approximation of the overlying soft tissues. Polypropylene mesh was also used in the VRAM closure, where it was sutured on top of the retrorectus fascia, prior to skin closure around bulb-suction drains. Blood transfusions were performed as necessary to maintain a hemoglobin level above 9 g/dL.

Patient Follow-up

The patients were closely followed by a multidisciplinary team, which included plastic surgery, intensive care, psychology, dentistry, and speech therapy. A methylene blue swallow study was routinely performed on post-operative day 6 to assess suture leak. Flap viability was clinically assessed by skin color, temperature and capillary refill every three hours for the first 48 hours after surgery. Long-term follow-up included evaluation of flap necrosis, quality of wound healing and vessel perfusion through CTA after 6 months. Patients were fed a high caloric protein diet through a nasoenteral feeding tube or a gastrostomy until the patients were able to receive adequate hydration and nutrition orally. Patient satisfaction with final reconstruction, speech and swallow outcomes were subjectively measured based on the patient’s perceived quality of life before and after the surgery and were graded as poor, moderate, fair and good.


Anatomic Study

After a pilot study in 10 cadavers to verify the anatomy and feasibility of the proposed technique, we were able to dissect the PIMOC on each side in all 35 cadavers.

Seventy flaps were bilaterally harvested in 27 (77%) male and 8 (23%) female cadavers. We observed that the anterior intercostal vessels arise from the internal mammary artery and the musculophrenic branch; the later typically giving rise to the intercostal vessels from the 6th rib down. Arterial diameter and length of the internal mammary pedicle and its branches were not statistically different with regards to gender and laterality. Caliber of the IMA ranged from 1.5 to 2.4 mm; the internal mammary vein from 2.0 to 3.6 mm (Fig. 3). Caliber measurements of the smaller veins were excluded due to imprecision in cadaver specimens21. The superficial superior epigastric perforator (SSEP) was confirmed as the first perforator of the DSEA just after its division from the IMA at the inferior costal margin19. Pedicle length to the 6th and 7th rib osteomyocutaneous components ranged from 18.5 to 21.6 cm, providing adequate length for flap rotation to the face in all dissections. The VRAM component reached the head in all dissections.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Arterial Caliber of Pedicles within the PIMOC. Mean values and standard deviation represented in millimeters.

Clinical Cases

Prior to PIMOC surgery, patients were submitted to an average of 1.8 free flap and 2.7 loco-regional flap reconstructions, including the free fibula, pectoralis major, deltopectoralis, supraclavicular and tongue flaps. On average, each patient underwent 2.3 tumor resections and 5.4 previous surgeries (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of our PIMOC Series.

The PIMOC included a 6th rib segment in two patients and a 7th rib segment in two patients, three of which contained a myocutaneous component supplied by intercostal perforators. In four patients, we harvested the rectus abdominis muscle with overlying skin supplied by epigastric artery perforators, and, in two patients (patients 2 and 3), we included an SSEP cutaneous flap (Figs 4 and 5). In Video, Supplemental Digital Content 2, we demonstrate the dissection and clinical application of the PIMOC in salvage head and neck reconstruction cases.

Figure 4
Figure 4

PIMOCs. (A) Patient 1. Left extended pedicle VRAM flap (1). (B) Patient 2. Right PIMOC with 6th rib (*), SSEP (2) and VRAM (1). (C) Patient 3. Right PIMOC with 6th rib osteomyocutaneous component (3) and SSEP (2). (D) Patient 5. Right PIMOC with 7th rib (*) osteomyocutaneous component (3) and VRAM (1). Internal mammary artery (blue arrow); musculophrenic and intercostal arteries (green arrow); DSEA and SSEP arteries (yellow arrow).

Figure 5
Figure 5

Patient 4 underwent composite mandibular resection for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the mandible and floor of mouth with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy, followed by multiple failed reconstruction attempts. (A) Pre-operative full thickness defect involving the lateral cheek and hemi-mandible with an exposed, tethered tongue after failed pectoralis major, supraclavicular, deltopectoralis and tongue flap reconstructions. Note the laparotomy scar from gastrectomy secondary to gastric ulcer. (B) Harvest of the right PIMOC containing the 7th rib (*) osteomyocutaneous (2) and VRAM (1) components. (C) Rotation of the PIMOC to the contralateral face. (D) Inset of the intercostal perforator skin island for reconstruction of oral lining. (E) Fixation of the rib (*) for mandible reconstruction with large reconstruction plate. VRAM (1) for neck skin resurfacing. (F) Post-op 5 months with complete healing of the initial defect and donor site. The residual deltopectoralis flap was used for additional external coverage. The patient regained oral competence and speech and swallow capabilities. Planned revision of the excess external skin was postponed due to cranial base SCC recurrence. IMA (blue arrow); musculophrenic artery (green arrow); DSEA (yellow arrow); pivot point of IMA pedicle (white arrow); tracheostomy site (black arrow).

All patients recovered in the Intensive Care Unit for an average of 4 days. Thoracic tubes were maintained post-operatively for an average of 3.6 days and were well tolerated by all patients. In all cases, inverted L sternotomy and the resection of a single rib did not compromise the ventilatory status of the patient. In one case, there was mild venous congestion of the flap that resolved after suture release over the pedicle (patient 5).

Donor sites were closed primarily in all cases without major donor site complications including respiratory compromise or sternal nonunion (Fig. 6A). There was one small sternal sinus that resolved with sternal wire removal and re-closure. All osseous segments remained viable and underwent adequate osseous integration, confirmed by post-operative CTA (Fig. 6B). Head and neck tissue fibrosis was replaced by healthy donor tissue in all cases. All patients experienced minor wound dehiscences and small salivary fistulae that resolved on average within 21 days with dressing changes or debridement and flap advancement. There were no complete flap losses or segmental flap necrosis. Hospital length of stay averaged 32 days and mean follow up was 12 months. All patients were satisfied with their final reconstruction result and gradually recovered oral competence with fair (1) or good (4) speech and swallow outcomes (Table 1).

Figure 6
Figure 6

Post-op clinical cases. (A) Primary closure of the PIMOC donor site in patient 3. (B) 3D reconstruction of computed topography angiography (CTA) demonstrating osseous integration of the left mandibular body with the 7th rib (blue arrows) in patient 4. There is increased ossification at 6 months post-op. (C) Sagital CTA demonstrating the internal mammary artery pedicle pivoted anteriorly around the first rib (A) and clavicle (B) and ascending into the head and neck region (blue arrows).


Ariyan et al. and Hendel et al. observed that the caliber and arterial flow of anterior and posterior intercostal vessels are similar, confronting the belief of a posterior predominance at that time22,23. Their findings support our flap design, which includes rib segments supplied by the anterior intercostal artery. Furthermore, there is evidence that the vascular pedicle supplying the rib comes from both the superior and inferior borders24, which were included in our PIMOC. This vascularized bone graft is slightly convex and is amenable to multiple osteotomies and fixation sites, promoting better restoration of mandibular defects. The overlying skin and muscle may also be included to create an osteomyocutaneous flap through preservation of the intercostal perforators supplying the intercostal, anterior serratus, or external oblique muscles.

IMA caliber discrepancy, with right-sided vessels reportedly larger than the left, and variation in the presence and number of the venae comitantes has been described19,25,26,27. However, in our 70 cadaveric flap dissections, there was no difference in the IMA caliber with respect to gender or laterality (p < 0.005), and there was at least one vena comitans accompanying all arterial pedicles. This difference may be due to anatomical variations between the cadaver and live patient.

PIMOC dissection and isolation of the individual pedicles was reproducible bilaterally in all cadavers. The intercostal branches supplying the 6th and 7th ribs were consistent in length and were dissected in continuity with the rectus abdominis pedicle in all specimens. This increases flap versatility as flap design can be selected based on ease of dissection.

The VRAM component is a simpler dissection and provides a very wide arc of rotation to reach the occiput. The presence of the DIEA at its inferior border allows for anastomosis of an additional free flap or for supercharging the PIMOC (Fig. 1).

The absence of healthy and reliable recipient vessels in head and neck reconstruction is a significant and more frequently encountered problem. Many strategies have been described to improve recipient vessel availability in these cases. Cephalic vein transfer can be a reliable option and may be combined with the radial forearm flap3,8. The thoracoacromial vessels can also be used as recipients for microsurgical anastomosis, even after pectoralis myocutaneous flap harvest8,28. If available, the contralateral neck vessels may also suffice; however, a vein graft or AV loop is often necessary, which requires additional vessel anastomoses and, as such, increased risk of complications3,4.

The internal mammary vessels have long been used for microsurgical mammary and chest wall reconstruction29,30,31. They are, however, less commonly utilized for head and neck reconstruction. Urken et al. and Urban et al. described a series of reconstructions with an internal mammary pedicle, accessed through the third intercostal space, as a recipient for a free rectus abdominis muscle flap for salvage head and neck cases14,32.

The internal mammary vessels have also been used for pedicled flaps. In 1971, Strauch described a complex experimental IMA pedicled flap in a canine model. His dissection extended through a sternotomy incision to elevate an osteomyocutaneous rib flap that was rotated to the cephalic region33. A few plastic surgeons applied a similar technique in the clinical setting; however, the approach was abandoned due to technical complexity, lack of clear indications, anatomic variations, and donor site morbidity26,34,35,36. Ketchum et al. and Cook et al. transferred pedicled 7th and 5th rib osseous-only flaps, respectively, via sternotomy incisions and fracturing of the adjacent synchondroses for mandibular reconstruction34,35. Later, Arons and Guyron described a rib osteomyocutaneous chimeric pedicle flap harvested through cartilaginous rib resections that was rotated to the lower third of the face in a patient with calcinosis universalis who underwent 29 previous surgeries including two free fibulas. The flap was delayed for 8 days due to flap congestion36.

Based on these challenges and our previous anatomic studies, we sought to create a novel chimeric flap for salvage head and neck reconstruction and were able to establish a reliable and reproducible harvesting technique for what we named the PIMOC. This procedure was successfully applied to five clinical cases of salvage head and neck reconstruction with satisfactory subjective patient outcomes.

The osteomyocutaneous rib flap proposed by Strauch et al. was discouraged and limited in its full development due to dissection difficulties and donor site morbidity. Their approach to the IMA in the canine model created an unstable thorax, resulting in 70% mortality and 100% severe thoracic complications33. Ketchum et al. performed a median sternotomy incision and fractured all synchondroses from the 1st to 6th ribs in order to access the 7th rib flap, resulting in thoracic instability in the live patient34. Others accessed the internal mammary vasculature through conventional sternotomy incisions with cartilaginous rib resections to perform pedicled rib flaps which also resulted in thoracic instability35,36. Many of the patients who would benefit from a procedure such as the PIMOC are long-time smokers and do not have the functional ventilatory reserve to tolerate such instability.

To limit donor site insult, we performed an inverted L sternotomy with preservation of the manubrium as described in the cardiothoracic literature37, and maintained an intact skin island separating the sternotomy incision from the tracheostomy site. The inverted L sternotomy has less donor site morbidity than the average 3% seen with the standard total median sternotomy37,38,39,40. The transverse osteotomy at the first intercostal space preserves the structure and function of the thoracic cavity, allowing adequate post-operative consolidation of the sternum. This approach minimizes contamination from the tracheostomy site and consequent mediastinal infection (Fig. 2). Prevention of pneumothorax was managed with a thoracic tube to allow adequate postoperative lung expansion and preclude pleural effusion. Although there is risk for sternal bone nonunion, we achieved adequate sternal wire fixation and bony union, and observed only one draining sinus, which resolved with excision of the involved sternal wire and reclosure. A thoracoscopic approach may also facilitate the dissection and reduce the physiologic burden to the donor site. This method is currently being studied by our group.

The rib has been criticized for providing a weak bone substitute for a functional mandible reconstruction. However, the availability of the rib as a vascularized bone graft with its independent blood supply is an important alternative for the reconstructive surgery. The long-term strength of the rib in mandibular reconstruction has yet to be determined. It will likely require further bone hypertrophy before supporting dental implantation, and it remains unclear if it would actually be possible in such cases. However, ossification and bone width expansion of vascularized rib grafts have been shown in humeral and vertebral reconstructions41,42. Although not quantified, we see this trend in our patients as well (Fig. 6B). Moreover, ribs 6 and 7 were selected based on increased bone width in comparison to the other ribs. This technique provides a long pedicle to a vascularized rib graft that may also be used as a free flap for other bony reconstructions throughout the body.

Prior to the development of the PIMOC technique, our customary procedure of choice for salvage head and neck reconstruction was mobilization of distant recipient vessels for free tissue transfer or regional flap advancement with suboptimal results. In fact, the first patient to enroll in the PIMOC flap protocol (patient 1) had a preoperative CT angiogram demonstrating a lack of reliable recipient neck vessels for safe free flap transfer. This patient was overall quite thin with the majority of his available redundant tissue in the abdomen. Instead of mobilizing the internal mammary vessels for free flap anastomosis14,32, we favored a pedicled flap to include the extended VRAM for the reconstruction in this scenario.

Access to the internal mammary pedicle is directly within the mediastinum on the undersurface of the ribs. If the surgeon is less comfortable performing sternotomy incisions, a multidisciplinary approach with a cardiothoracic surgeon can be utilized. Dissection of the vascular pedicle is tedious; however, it is possible to isolate both osteomyocutaneous and myocutaneous components bilaterally. The flap can also be inset into the contralateral face (patient 4). The decision to pivot the flap over the first rib resulted in pedicle shortening by approximately 6 cm; however, this did not compromise flap reach and instead avoided undue subclavicular dissection (Fig. 6C). One may argue that mediastinal access with adjacent neck exposure may increase mediastinal infection risk from salivary fistulae; however, no salivary fistulae in continuity with the mediastinum or thoracic infections were noted in our series.

All patients presented with minor wound dehiscences, primarily due to poor local tissue quality of the recipient site as a result of scar, fibrosis, friable inflammatory tissue, radiation damage, multiple surgeries, previous infections, and salivary contamination. The skin paddles from the PIMOC flap supplied healthy tissue with a robust blood supply and presented no partial or total necrosis. Flap inset was performed in a tension-free manner, with the vascular pedicle loosely positioned within the subcutaneous tissue of the neck. While our reconstructive approach focused on resurfacing as much damaged tissue as possible – removing scared, fibrotic, poorly vascularized tissue in order to substitute it with new soft, malleable, well-vascularized flap tissue – we also understood that it is impossible to resect all damaged tissue in the region, and therefore planned for some expected peripheral wound breakdown. The flap inset was designed accordingly to protect the vascular pedicle and main flap vessels from salivary fistula, so that if a fistula were to present peri-operatively, it would be in an area of the neck that was manageable. Improvement in wound dehiscence rates may be achieved through more selective radiotherapy regimens, improved patient nutrition, and optimized blood pressure and tissue oxygenation.

The PIMOC is an additional resource for the astute reconstructive microsurgeon and has several valuable characteristics. It is a pedicled composite flap with malleable individual tissue components that easily extends to the head and neck region, allowing three-dimensional functional reconstruction without the need for microsurgical anastomosis in an unfavorable neck. Long individual vascular pedicles within the flap increase versatility of each flap component. The main blood supply is based off of the well-known internal mammary artery vascular system, which has been utilized for cardiac revascularization for over 30 years43,44. The flap components are well-studied, such as the rectus abdominis, which is regularly used for breast and perineal reconstruction, and rib grafts for craniofacial surgery45,46,47. The distant donor site allows for a simultaneous multi-team approach and provides non-irradiated tissue with tolerable morbidity.


The cadaveric anatomic study was essential for the development of a viable PIMOC flap. The PIMOC provides well-vascularized chimeric tissue with variable composition and individualized components for optimal salvage head and neck reconstruction. Although technically complex, flap dissection is reproducible and reliable. The inverted L sternotomy and harvest of the 6th or 7th rib with rectus abdominis muscle render an acceptable donor site. PIMOC reconstruction improved functional and structural outcomes and enhanced the quality of life for tertiary head and neck cancer patients.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Yazar, S. Selection of recipient vessels in microsurgical free tissue reconstruction of head and neck defects. Microsurgery 27, 588–594, (2007).

  2. 2.

    Hurvitz, K. A., Kobayashi, M. & Evans, G. R. Current options in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 118, 122e–133e, (2006).

  3. 3.

    Hanasono, M. M., Barnea, Y. & Skoracki, R. J. Microvascular surgery in the previously operated and irradiated neck. Microsurgery 29, 1–7, (2009).

  4. 4.

    Head, C. et al. Microvascular reconstruction after previous neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128, 328–331 (2002).

  5. 5.

    Wei, F. C. et al. Management of secondary soft-tissue deficits following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction by means of another free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 103, 1158–1166 (1999).

  6. 6.

    Knoetgen, J. III., Choudry, U., Finical, S. J. & Johnson, C. H. Head and neck reconstruction with a second free flap following resection of a recurrent malignancy. Ann Plast Surg 55, 378–383 (2005).

  7. 7.

    Schusterman, M. A. et al. A single center’s experience with 308 free flaps for repair of head and neck cancer defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 93, 472–478; discussion 479–480 (1994).

  8. 8.

    Harris, J. R., Lueg, E., Genden, E. & Urken, M. L. The thoracoacromial/cephalic vascular system for microvascular anastomoses in the vessel-depleted neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128, 319–323 (2002).

  9. 9.

    Shimizu, F., Lin, M. P., Ellabban, M., Evans, G. R. & Cheng, M. H. Superficial temporal vessels as a reserve recipient site for microvascular head and neck reconstruction in vessel-depleted neck. Ann Plast Surg 62, 134–138, (2009).

  10. 10.

    Vogt, P. M. et al. Outcome of simultaneous and staged microvascular free tissue transfer connected to arteriovenous loops in areas lacking recipient vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 120, 1568–1575, (2007).

  11. 11.

    Jacobson, A. S., Eloy, J. A., Park, E., Roman, B. & Genden, E. M. Vessel-depleted neck: techniques for achieving microvascular reconstruction. Head Neck 30, 201–207, (2008).

  12. 12.

    Takamatsu, A., Harashina, T. & Inoue, T. Selection of appropriate recipient vessels in difficult, microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery 12, 499–507; discussion 508–413, (1996).

  13. 13.

    Cuono, C. B. & Ariyan, S. Immediate reconstruction of a composite mandibular defect with a regional osteomusculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 65, 477–484 (1980).

  14. 14.

    Urban, V. & Fritsche, E. Internal thoracic vessels as recipient vessels for free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59, 1348–1349, (2006).

  15. 15.

    Yagi, S., Kamei, Y., Fujimoto, Y. & Torii, S. Use of the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels for an omental flap in head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 58, 531–535, (2007).

  16. 16.

    Kalender, V., Aydm, H., Karabulut, A. B., Ozcan, M. & Amiraslanov, A. Breast reconstruction with the internal mammary artery pedicled fasciocutaneous island flap: description of a new flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 106, 1494–1498; discussion 1499–1500 (2000).

  17. 17.

    Roche, N. A., Houtmeyers, P., Vermeersch, H. F., Stillaert, F. B. & Blondeel, P. N. The role of the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in secondary and tertiary head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, (2012).

  18. 18.

    Ninkovic, M. M., Schwabegger, A. H. & Anderl, H. Internal mammary vessels as a recipient site. Clinics in plastic surgery 25, 213–221 (1998).

  19. 19.

    Palmer, J. H. & Taylor, G. I. The vascular territories of the anterior chest wall. Br J Plast Surg 39, 287–299 (1986).

  20. 20.

    Boyd, J. B., Taylor, G. I. & Corlett, R. The vascular territories of the superior epigastric and the deep inferior epigastric systems. Plast Reconstr Surg 73, 1–16 (1984).

  21. 21.

    Hamdi, M., Blondeel, P., Van Landuyt, K. & Monstrey, S. Algorithm in choosing recipient vessels for perforator free flap in breast reconstruction: the role of the internal mammary perforators. Br J Plast Surg 57, 258–265, (2004).

  22. 22.

    Ariyan, S. & Finseth, F. J. The anterior chest approach for obtaining free osteocutaneous rib grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 62, 676–685 (1978).

  23. 23.

    Hendel, P. M., Hattner, R. S., Rodrigo, J. & Buncke, H. J. The functional vascular anatomy of rib. Plast Reconstr Surg 70, 578–587 (1982).

  24. 24.

    Moore, K. L., Dalley, A. F. & Agur, A. M. R. Clinically oriented anatomy. 7th edn, (Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014).

  25. 25.

    Schwabegger, A. H., Piza-Katzer, H., Pauzenberger, R. & Del Frari, B. The internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) breast-flap harvested from an asymmetric hyperplastic breast for correction of a mild funnel chest deformity. Aesthetic plastic surgery 35, 928–932, (2011).

  26. 26.

    Vesely, M. J., Murray, D. J., Novak, C. B., Gullane, P. J. & Neligan, P. C. The internal mammary artery perforator flap: an anatomical study and a case report. Ann Plast Surg 58, 156–161, (2007).

  27. 27.

    Hefel, L. et al. Internal mammary vessels: anatomical and clinical considerations. Br J Plast Surg 48, 527–532 (1995).

  28. 28.

    Okazaki, M. et al. Analysis of salvage treatments following the failure of free flap transfer caused by vascular thrombosis in reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 119, 1223–1232, (2007).

  29. 29.

    Nahabedian, M. The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 68, 537–538, (2012).

  30. 30.

    Munhoz, A. M. Internal mammary perforator recipient vessels for breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 122, 315–316, (2008).

  31. 31.

    Chang, E. I. et al. Demystifying the use of internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132, 763–768, (2013).

  32. 32.

    Urken, M. L., Higgins, K. M., Lee, B. & Vickery, C. Internal mammary artery and vein: recipient vessels for free tissue transfer to the head and neck in the vessel-depleted neck. Head Neck 28, 797–801, (2006).

  33. 33.

    Strauch, B., Bloomberg, A. E. & Lewin, M. L. An experimental approach to mandibular replacement: island vascular composite rib grafts. Br J Plast Surg 24, 334–341 (1971).

  34. 34.

    Ketchum, L. D., Masters, F. W. & Robinson, D. W. Mandibular reconstruction using a composite island rib flap. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 53, 471–476 (1974).

  35. 35.

    Cook, D. W. et al. Mandibular reconstruction in an irradiated field using median sternotomy and anterior rib axial graft. Laryngoscope 98, 349–352, (1988).

  36. 36.

    Arons, J. A. & Guyuron, B. Use of a rectus abdominis osteomyocutaneous double island flap based on internal mammary vessels. Br J Plast Surg 48, 145–149 (1995).

  37. 37.

    Tosaka, Y., Nakazawa, S., Takahashi, Y., Kanazawa, H. & Yamazaki, Y. Inverted L-shape sternotomy as a minimally invasive approach: re-do cardiac surgery for papillary muscle rupture. The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: official publication of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery=Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai zasshi 52, 570–573, (2004).

  38. 38.

    Brown, M. L., McKellar, S. H., Sundt, T. M. & Schaff, H. V. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137, 670–679 e675, (2009).

  39. 39.

    Centofanti, P. et al. A prospective study of prevalence of 60-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery. An updated risk factor analysis. The Journal of cardiovascular surgery 48, 641–646 (2007).

  40. 40.

    Farhat, F., Metton, O. & Jegaden, O. Benefits and complications of total sternotomy and ministernotomy in cardiac surgery. Surgical technology international 13, 199–205 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Sundaresh, D. C., Gopalakrishnan, D. & Shetty, N. Vascularised rib graft defects of the diaphysis of the humerus in children. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82, 28–32 (2000).

  42. 42.

    Deen, H. G., Zimmerman, R. S. & Lanza, L. A. Vascular pedicle rib graft in anterior transthoracic fusion procedures. Technical note. J Neurosurg 90, 155–158 (1999).

  43. 43.

    Haller, J. D. & Olearchyk, A. S. Cardiology’s 10 greatest discoveries. Tex Heart Inst J 29, 342–344 (2002).

  44. 44.

    Kolessov, V. I. Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54, 535–544 (1967).

  45. 45.

    Hartrampf, C. R., Scheflan, M. & Black, P. W. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 69, 216–225 (1982).

  46. 46.

    Sajjadian, A., Rubinstein, R. & Naghshineh, N. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: part I. Autologous grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 125, 40e–49e, (2010).

  47. 47.

    Tessier, P. et al. Taking long rib grafts for facial reconstruction–tools and techniques: III. A 2900-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116, 38S–46S; discussion 92S–94S (2005).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Flavio H. F. Galvão, Rachel R. Baptista, Kiril E. Kasai, Daniel M. dos Anjos, Marcus C. Ferreira contributed equally to this work.


  1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13080-888, Brazil

    • Guilherme C. Barreiro
    • , Rachel R. Baptista
    • , Kiril E. Kasai
    •  & Daniel M. dos Anjos
  2. Institute for Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, 62702, USA

    • Chelsea C. Snider
  3. Department of Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil

    • Flavio H. F. Galvão
  4. Division of Plastic Surgery, Syrian-Lebanese Hospital, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil

    • Marcus C. Ferreira


  1. Search for Guilherme C. Barreiro in:

  2. Search for Chelsea C. Snider in:

  3. Search for Flavio H. F. Galvão in:

  4. Search for Rachel R. Baptista in:

  5. Search for Kiril E. Kasai in:

  6. Search for Daniel M. dos Anjos in:

  7. Search for Marcus C. Ferreira in:


G.C.B.: participated in the conception of the flap and work design, planning and performing the cadaver dissections, recordings; work design and development; writing and article preparation. C.C.S.: participated in the critical analysis of the manuscript, in the preparation on the cases and documentation, writing and article preparation. F.H.F.G.: participated in the elaboration of the manuscript and the administrative part of the work. R.R.B.: participated in the planning of the dissections and in the dissections themselves, recordings, work design and development. K.E.K.: participated in the dissections and in the recordings. D.M.A.: participated in the dissections and in the recordings. M.C.F.: participated in the administrative part of the work and writing.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme C. Barreiro.

Electronic supplementary material


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit