Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Is astrobiology serious science?

Is the scientific status of astrobiology undermined by the lack of evidence for alien life, the problematic influence of science fiction, or the use of ‘astrobiology’ as a buzzword for attracting funding? Here we defend the emerging discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Simpson, G. G. Science 143, 769–775 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gest, H. The “Astrobiology” Fantasy of NASA (2006); https://biology.indiana.edu/documents/historical-materials/gest_pdfs/astrobiology.pdf

  3. Reinecke, D. & Bimm, J. Soc. Stud. Sci. 52, 199–226 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McMahon, S. Astrobiology (overview). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.1 (Oxford University Press, 2021).

  5. Carré, L., Zaccai, G., Delfosse, X., Girard, E. & Franzetti, B. Astrobiology 22, 322–367 (2022).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dick, S. J. & Strick, J. E. The Living Universe: NASA and the development of astrobiology. (Rutgers University Press, 2004).

  7. Lazcano, A. & Hand, K. P. Nature 488, 160–161 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ward, P. D. & Brownlee, D. Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe (Springer Science & Business Media, 2000).

  9. Ćirković, M. M. Some contemporary – and persistent – fallacies and confusions about astrobiology. In What is Life? On Earth and Beyond (ed. Losch, A.) 156–177 (Cambridge University Press, 2017).

  10. Wright, J. T. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 927, L30 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeancolas, C., Gillen, C., Ward, M., McMahon, S. & Vickers, P. Int. J. Astrobiol. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550423000241 (2023).

  12. Thoma, J. Philos. of Sci. 82, 454–472 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lingam, M. & Loeb, A. Astrobiology 19, 28–39 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bada, J. L. Science 307, 46–46 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frantz, S. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 3, 1065–1065 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyrille Jeancolas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeancolas, C., Gillen, C., McMahon, S. et al. Is astrobiology serious science?. Nat Astron 8, 5–7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02165-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02165-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing