Abstract
Metal halide solid-state electrolytes have gained widespread attention due to their high ionic conductivities, wide electrochemical stability windows, and good compatibility with oxide cathode materials. The exploration of highly ionic conductive halide electrolytes is actively ongoing. Thus, understanding the relationship between composition and crystal structure can be a critical guide for designing better halide electrolytes, which still remains obscure for reliable prediction. Here we show that the cationic polarization factor, which describes the geometric and ionic conditions, is effective in predicting the stacking structure of halide electrolytes formation. By supplementing this principle with rational design and preparation of more than 10 lithium halide electrolytes with high conductivity over 10−3 S cm−1 at 25 °C, we establish that there should be a variety of promising halide electrolytes that have yet to be discovered and developed. This methodology may enable the systematic screening of various potential halide electrolytes and demonstrate an approach to the design of halide electrolytes with superionic conductivity beyond the structure and stability predictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Lithium metal halide solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), with the formula of LiaMXb, have represented one of the dominant families of superionic conductors (>10−4 S cm−1 at 25 °C) for all-solid-state lithium batteries1,2,3,4. The M stands for one or multiple metal elements that can dominate the structure and facilitate the migration of lithium ions. Except for the latest developed SmCl3-based chlorides3 (large-sized Sm3+ or La3+) and glassified LiTaCl62 SSEs, most LiaMXb halides are developed from LiX structure. Thus, these LiaMXb halides can be regarded as the distribution of cations (including lithium-ion and multivalent M cations) and vacancies in the anionic framework due to the much larger ionic radius of halogen anions5. The LiaMXb halides can initially be divided into two types based on the different anion frameworks, including the hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) and cubic-close-packed (ccp) type anionic sublattices (Fig. 1a, b). Both hcp and ccp are close-packed with a 74% atomic packing factor6,7. However, the ccp structure possesses higher structural symmetry than the hcp structure. The hcp structure is described by the D6h point group (24 symmetry elements), while the ccp structure is the Oh point group (48 symmetry elements).
When further considering the occupation of cations, the ccp stacked LiaMXb halides normally possess a monoclinic structure, which is labeled as ccp-M (space group C2/m). While there are two structure types for the hcp stacked halides, namely the trigonal (hcp-T, space group P3̅m1) and orthorhombic (hcp-O, space group Pnma) structures8. Here, the different occupancies of cations directly lead to the discrepancy in space-group symmetries between hcp-T and hcp-O typed LiaMXb halides. All three structure types are based on octahedral coordination. Halide lithium superionic conductors with these stackings show distinctly different Li+ ion migration properties. The ccp-M typed and hcp-O typed LiaMXb halides usually possess higher Li+ conductivity over 10−3 S cm−1 at 25 °C1,9,10,11,12,12. Normally, the structural transition among those different structures as well as the induced variation of ionic conductivities can occur through substitutions or adjusting the synthesis conditions12,13,14.
In the search for SSEs with high ionic conductivity, wide electrochemical stability window, and good compatibility with oxide cathodes, various hcp-T, hcp-O, and ccp-M typed LiaMXb halides have been synthesized and investigated. However, effective guidelines for designing and preparing optimal halide SSEs are lacking, which continues as a great challenge to accelerating superionic materials discovery. The basic descriptor is the radius ratio rule that relates to the structure and composition of solid-state compounds. For LiaMXb type halides based on octahedral sublattices, according to the law of ionic packing, they can be differentiated from other halides based on the radius ratio of cation to anion (k = r+/r−). Two critical values of 0.414 (octahedral factor) and 0.732 (cubic factor) are obtained from the geometric information as presented in Fig. 1c, d. The octahedral sublattice structure can be theoretically stable when 0.414 < k < 0.732. Thus, the two critical lines calculated from the radius ratio of multivalent cations and halide ions distinguish the LiaMXb type halides from others (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Table 1). We further propose another key k value of 0.647 (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2 for detailed calculation) that separates the cubic-close-packed (ccp-M) and hexagonal-close-packed (hcp-T and hcp-O) structures in these LiaMXb halides. This hints that the ionic radius of the cations/anions plays an important role in the stackings of the halide SSEs. Nevertheless, this method only accounts for the difference in cation/anion radii, which makes it impossible to predict the structure of halides with the same metal cations and anions (e.g. hcp-T typed Li3HoCl6 and hcp-O typed Li2.727Ho1.091Cl6)11, let alone give further guidance of structure regulation.
Results
Besides the basic crystal size requirements, another significant parameter that dominates the stability of solid-state compounds is the ionic potential of ions. The ionic potential (I) is defined as the ratio of cationic charge (z+) and cationic radius (r+), which reflects the polarizing power of cations. The ionic potential gives an indication of the strength of the electrostatic attraction of ions with opposite charges. Aiming at a guide for the crystal structure control of the halide SSEs, we propose the “cationic polarization factor” (τ) to predict the structure of LiaMXb halides based on the chemical composition, which has the form
where ΦLi represents the molar content proportionally ionic potential of lithium ions, which is defined as ΦLi = nLi × ILi; Similarly, ΣΦM and ΣΦX represent the summation of the molar content proportionally ionic potential of different ions.
Then, we can apply the proposed cationic polarization factor to distinguish and design LiaMXb halide superionic conductors. The prediction of LiaMXb halides stability using the cationic polarization factor requires only the chemical composition. In addition to predicting if a LiaMXb material is stable as ccp-M, hcp-T, or hcp-O structure, the cationic polarization factor also provides an estimate of the phase transition among those different structures, which further induces different Li-conducting behavior (Fig. 1f, g). Thus, the forecast based on the cationic polarization factor can constitute a useful predictive tool for those still unexplored halides and for discovering new halides with superionic conductivity.
All the reported information to our best knowledge about the LiaMXb halides with octahedral sublattice was used to analyze the influence of τ. The radii used here were obtained based on Shannon crystal ionic radii which are closer to the physical size of ions in a solid15. The molar content proportionally ionic potential of lithium ions (ΦLi) were plotted as a function of the τ values to show the phase map of the reported LiaMXb halides as shown in Fig. 1f. There are two lines that separate the hcp-T, hcp-O, and ccp-M type halide SSEs, indicating that the τ is a promising descriptor of the crystallography structure of the LiaMXb halides. A lower τ implies stronger electronic cloud extension of the cations, thus leading to a stronger impact on the halogen anion framework when the cations stack into the anion framework. Finally, this will result in a degradation of the anion framework symmetry from ccp to hcp arrangement. On the other hand, a larger τ, achieved in the case of smaller M cations or larger anion framework, has less impact on the halogen anion framework, favoring the ccp structure (Fig. 1g).
Using the τ as a guide, we design specific stacking structures by controlling the compositions of the Li3MX6 halides. A notable starting point is Li3HoCl6, which possesses an hcp-T typed structure11,13. Increasing the τ suggests a possible route to adjust the structure to the ccp-M typed structure via partial substituting of Ho3+ by In3+ (Fig. 2a), where In3+ has a higher ionic potential. As presented, three target samples (including Li3Ho0.85In0.15Cl6, Li3Ho0.78In0.22Cl6, and Li3Ho0.6In0.4Cl6) were designed and synthesized to validate the trigger point of the structural transition. The Li3Ho0.85In0.15Cl6 sample with a small amount of In3+ substitution induces the transition from pure hcp-T structure to the co-existence of hcp-T and hcp-O structure (Fig. 2b). Further increase of the In3+ content indeed leads to the complete transition to the ccp-M structure. Such a structural transition can be predictable. With a larger τ, the weaker electron cloud extension of the cations is less likely to destroy the originally high symmetry of the ccp anion framework upon interstitial occupation of cations. Rietveld refinement of the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the Li3Ho0.6In0.4Cl6 sample in Fig. 2c confirmed its monoclinic structure. Meanwhile, the dramatic increase in ionic conductivity coincided with the formation of the ccp-M structure (Supplementary Fig. 2). Among the Li3Ho1-xInxCl6 samples, the highest ionic conductivity of 2.5 × 10−3 S cm−1 (25 °C) was achieved by Li3Ho0.6In0.4Cl6. The value is more than ten times higher than that of the pristine hcp-T type Li3HoCl6. The similar structure and ionic conductivity evolution can be further confirmed in the Li3Ho1-xScxCl6 and Li3Er1-xInxCl6 systems (Supplementary Figs. S3–7, Supplementary Tables 8, 9).
In the case of constant Li content and unchanged M3+ selection, the structure transition from hcp-T to ccp-M can also be realized by decreasing the ionic potential of X− with the substitution of a larger anion. Two representatives are hcp-T typed Li3YCl611,16 and ccp-M typed Li3YBr617. When Li+ and Y3+ cations stack into the anion framework, the larger size of the Br− anion will dilute the electronic cloud extension effect of cations, thus ensuring the high symmetry of the Br− anion framework in the ccp arrangement. However, the Cl− anion framework with a smaller anion size cannot balance the electronic cloud extension effect of cations, thus resulting in the decreased symmetry of the Cl− anion framework to the hcp arrangement. Taking hcp-T typed Li3YCl6 as a starting point, partial or total substitution of Cl− by Br− to form ccp-M typed Li3YCl3Br3 and Li3YBr6 has been proved to be effective17,18. As displayed in Fig. 3a, b, the target sample of Li3YCl5.6Br0.4 still remains the hcp-T structure, while further Br- substitution induces structural transitions to the hcp-O and finally the ccp-M phases at compositions of Li3YCl4.8Br1.2 and Li3YCl4.5Br1.5, respectively. Rietveld refinement of the XRD pattern reveals that the hcp-O structure of the Li3YCl4.8Br1.2 can be indexed by the orthorhombic pnma space group (Fig. 3c, d). Moreover, the phase change from the hcp-T typed Li3YCl6 to ccp-M typed Li3YCl4.5Br1.5 also leads to an increased ionic conductivity up to 2.16 × 10−3 S cm−1 compared to 7.1 × 10−5 S cm−1 of Li3YCl6 (Supplementary Fig. 8). The similar structure and ionic conductivity evolution can be further confirmed in the Li3ErCl6-xBrx, Li3YCl3Br317, and Li3YbCl3Br3 halides (Supplementary Fig. S9).
We then use the cationic polarization factor to verify its feasibility in the influence on the cation stack within the same anion framework. In addition to the decreased structural symmetry from ccp to hcp anion framework due to the reduced cation polarization, further lowering the τ will boost the severe degradation of symmetry from hcp-O type (D4h point group, 16 symmetry elements) to hcp-T type (D3d point group, 12 symmetry elements) structure caused by the different cation stack within the hcp anion sublattice (Li3MX6 composition, line 1 in Fig. 4a). In addition, our previous work has proved that the structural symmetry of hcp-T type Li3MCl6 (M = Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm) can be increased to hcp-O by changing the component to Li2.727M1.091Cl6 though the decreased τ11. This is reasonable due to that more vacancies are generated, which can weaken the effect of the cation stack on the basic anion framework.
By drawing the lines between Li3MCl6 and Li2.727M1.091Cl6 halides, several intersections with different Li3-3xM1+xCl6 compositions can be obtained. Based on these intersections, three target compositions of Li2.82Ho1.06Cl6, Li2.83Y1.057Cl6, and Li2.91Er1.03Cl6 were selected (Fig. 4a), which are close to the phase change line. The XRD patterns of these samples (Fig. 4b) demonstrate the hcp-O structure, proving the successful prediction of structural transition. The different amount of Li+ and M3+ cations that dominate the structural transition of Li3-3xM1+xCl6 halides is attributed to the various number of vacancies that are required to tolerate and balance the effect of the stacked cations within the anion sublattice. Compared to Li3ErCl6, the hcp-T type Li3HoCl6 with strong cation electronic cloud extension (small τ) needs a large number of vacancies to weaken the cation effect to achieve higher structural symmetry (change to hcp-O type). The impedance evaluation (Supplementary Fig. 10) confirms the prediction of higher RT ionic conductivities of the hcp-O structured Li2.83Y1.06Cl6 and Li2.727Y1.091Cl6 (5.7 × 10−4 S cm−1 and 6.9 × 10−4 S cm−1, respectively) than that of the hcp-T structured Li3YCl6 (7.1 × 10−5 S cm−1). The improved ionic conductivities should be due to the facile diffusion in the z-direction in the orthorhombic structure and such an increase in ionic conductivity from hcp-T to hcp-O type was also displayed in the Li2.727M1.091Cl6 (M = Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm) halides11.
The structural descriptor of the cationic polarization factor was further validated in the more complex cases with simultaneous change of cation concentrations and mixing of trivalent metal cations, identifying the borderline for structural transition among the three structures (hcp-T, hcp-O, and ccp-M). Along the line between hcp-T type Li3HoCl6 and ccp-M type Li2.727In1.091Cl6 halides, two targets of Li2.93Ho0.82In0.21Cl6 (Li2.93(Ho0.8In0.2)1.023Cl6) and Li2.85Ho0.525In0.525Cl6 (Li2.85(Ho0.5In0.5)1.05Cl6) are presented (Fig. 4c). By partial substitution of Ho3+ with In3+ and by the introduction of vacancies in the Li3HoCl6 base, the two target halide compositions presented the designed hcp-O and ccp-M structures as confirmed by their XRD patterns (Fig. 4d). The RT ionic conductivities along the line from Li3HoCl6 to Li2.727In1.091Cl6 also show the gradually increasing trend from hcp-T to hcp-O and the final ccp-M structure (Supplementary Table 4).
The calculation of cationic polarization factors is highly dependent on the cation and anion radii. For LiaMXb halides involved with M4+ cations, such as Li-M-Zr-Cl19, Li-M-Hf-Cl19, it can be seen that the structure based on the cationic polarization factor calculation should be ccp-M phase (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Table 15). However, the experimental results show that these Li-M-Zr(or Hf)-Cl halides possess hcp-O structure (except Li-In-Zr-Cl structure due to the stable Li2ZrCl6 is also ccp-M structured)20, which are different from the predicted.
The deviations are relatively interpretable. The radius difference of the cations should also be considered. The LiaMXb halides are developed from ccp-type LiX. Due to the larger radius of halogen anions, the structure of LiX can be seen as the distribution of small Li+ ions into the X− anion sublattice. When forming LiaMXb halides, M3+ cations are further added to the system. The highly symmetrical ccp structure can be maintained if there’s a minor difference in the cation radius. Thus, in the case of the same anion, Li3InCl6, and Li3ScCl6 with the smallest cation difference can keep the ccp structure (high symmetry). While Li3YbCl6 and Li3LuCl6 with moderate differences lead to decreased symmetry to hcp-O structure (moderate symmetry) and other Li3MCl6 halides (M = Y, Tb-Tm) with the largest difference result in a further decrease of symmetry to hcp-T structure (Supplementary Table 16). This further explains why Li3-xIn1-xZrxCl6 can achieve ccp structure while Li3-xYb1-xHfxCl6, Li3-xYb1-xZrxCl6, Li3-xY1-xZrxCl6, and Li3-xEr1-xZrxCl6 halides possess the hcp-O structure (Supplementary Table 17). Herein, the cationic polarization factor τ is modified for these Li3-xM1-x3+Mx4+X6 halides with a large cation radius difference.
where the x is the molar content of tetravalent cations. After modeling modification, the optimized τ values of these Li3-xM1-x3+Mx4+X6 halides are shown in Fig. 5b. We have further added several typical examples involving Zr4+ and Hf4+ as shown in Supplementary Table 18 and Supplementary Fig. 11. It can be seen that most of these halides can still locate in the hcp-O region. Thus, the whole phase map was further presented in Fig. 5c, which also includes the typical clarified samples in this work. Furthermore, the topography of the RT ionic conductivities of LiaMXb halides (Fig. 5d, e) presents that most reported halides with conductivity over 10−3 S cm−1 are located in the ccp anion sublattice region. In contrast, halides with hcp structure possess relatively low conductivity.
Overall, most of the LiaMXb halides are derived from basic LiCl. When introducing different multivalent cations into the LiCl ccp structure, it can be regarded as putting charged balls with varied radii into this system. The proposed τ here describes the ability of the material to maintain the basic ccp skeleton, which involves three key factors. The first one is the size difference among the cations (Li+ and Mx+) and the increase of size difference will destroy the high symmetry from ccp to hcp-O and finally to the hcp-T structure with the lowest symmetry. The second one is the anion framework. Normally, a larger-sized anion framework can reduce the cation effect, such as the ccp-structured Li3YBr6 compared with hcp-structured Li3YCl621. The third one is introducing more vacancy to weaken the cation effect, such as the hcp-O structured Li3-3xM1+xCl6 compared with hcp-T structured Li3MCl611.
Note that some other halide-based SSEs with different structures, such as nine-coordinated LaCl3-based SSEs are reported lately3. The formation of this structure is the result that f electrons also participate in the bonding of more Cl−. Thus, a more covalent composition of the chemical bonds is involved, which is not the scope of the radius ratio and proposed τ here that mainly focuses on ionic bonds. Other glassy halides2 that recently reported are also not discussed here due to their glassy structure.
Discussion
In summary, we mapped the structural landscape of the existing and potential superionic Li+ conducting halide SSEs by proposing a proposed cationic polarization factor, τ. The main difference among the hcp-T, hcp-O, and ccp-M structures of halide SSEs is the polarization among the cationic and anionic sublattices. The τ can not only successfully classify the experimentally observed halide structures but also predict the structure of the unreported halide SSE compositions. Guided by the τ, more than 10 lithium halide SSEs with RT ionic conductivities over 10−3 S cm−1 have been identified and synthesized. Moreover, the τ can be used to predict the phase transition compositions of lithium halide SSEs with different cation concentrations and different mixtures of multivalent cations. Well-designed phase transition can effectively tune the Li+-conducting behavior of halide SSEs. In most cases, highly improved ionic conductivity can be achieved by tuning the base structure from hcp to ccp. The deficiency of the τ for some halide electrolytes with tetravalent cations arises mainly from the large cation radius difference, which leads to the decrease of symmetry and thus influences the structure. Due to the simplicity and accuracy of the proposed τ, we expect its use to accelerate the exploration and design of lithium halide superionic conductors.
From the viewpoint of crystal structures, the halide SSEs discussed in our work are mainly based on octahedral coordination similar to the studies of various tolerance factors proposed for perovskite materials. Moreover, the cationic polarization factor proposed here is based on the ion stacking in ionic crystals. For other classes of ion conductors (such as sulfides, and polyanionic oxides), most of these materials contain structural frameworks that involve covalent bonds, such as PS43−, PO43−, and SiO44−. The crystal structures of these ion conductors possess various coordination conditions (four-coordination for PS43−, eight-coordinated LaO813−, etc.), which are totally different from that of halide SSE discussed here. Thus, the cationic polarization factor is not suitable for these materials. Precisely because of the structural and chemical distinctions, the Li+ migration through these frameworks will lead to the different phenomena and diffusion mechanisms in halide SSEs. For ion conductors with specific crystal structures, it’s still possible to investigate the formability by similar rules. We also hope that this work will be helpful to the modification of the tolerance factor for perovskite materials by further considering ionic charges rather than just the ionic radii effect.
Methods
Sample synthesis
The resulting materials were prepared by a co-melt and recrystallization method. The starting materials include lithium chloride (LiCl, Alfa Aesar, 99.9%), lithium bromide (LiBr, Alfa Aesar, 99.9%), trivalent rare earth bromides (MBr3, Alfa Aesar, >99.9%), and metal chlorides (MCl3, MCl4, Alfa Aesar, > 99.9%). Raw materials with stoichiometric ratio were directly put and sealed in a quartz tube at ~10 Pa under vacuum. The quartz tube was heated for 4 h to reach 550–650 °C and kept at 650 °C for 12 h. Then the quartz tube was cooled down to 25 °C within 10–48 h.
Characterizations
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were characterized on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å). The samples were loaded into a homemade air-tight holder to avoid air exposure.
Conductivity measurements
All the alternating current (AC) impedance was measured using Bio-Logic VMP3 electrochemical working station with an amplitude of 10 mV at frequencies from 7 MHz to 1 Hz. The pressing and cell assembling operations were conducted in the Ar-filled glove box (O2 < 1 ppm, H2O < 1 ppm). The synthesized solid electrolyte powder was pressed into pellets (10 mm diameter, thickness around 10 mm) at ~380 MPa and attached with stainless steel rod electrodes. An external pressure of ~200 Mpa was added during the impedance tests.
Data availability
The data of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Zhou, L. et al. High areal capacity, long cycle life 4 V ceramic all-solid-state Li-ion batteries enabled by chloride solid electrolytes. Nat. Energy 7, 83–93 (2022).
Ishiguro, Y., Ueno, K., Nishimura, S., Iida, G. & Igarashib, Y. TaCl5-glassified ultrafast lithium ion-conductive halide electrolytes for high-performance all-solid-state lithium batteries. Chem. Lett. 52, 237–241 (2023).
Fu, J. et al. Superionic conducting halide frameworks enabled by interface-bonded halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 2183–2194 (2023).
Liang, J., Li, X., Adair, K. R. & Sun, X. Metal halide superionic conductors for all-solid-state batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 1023–1033 (2021).
Wang, S. et al. Lithium chlorides and bromides as promising solid‐state chemistries for fast ion conductors with good electrochemical stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8039–8043 (2019).
Huo, D. et al. Seed-mediated growth of Au nanospheres into hexagonal stars and the emergence of a hexagonal close-packed phase. Nano Lett. 19, 3115–3121 (2019).
Combs, S., Todd, P., Gorai, P. & Maughan, A. Review—designing defects and diffusion through substitutions in metal halide solid. Electrolytes J. Electrochem. Soc. 169, 040551 (2022).
Kwak, H. et al. Emerging halide superionic conductors for all-solid-state batteries: design, synthesis, and practical applications. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 1776–1805 (2022).
Li, X. et al. Water‐mediated synthesis of a superionic halide solid electrolyte. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 16427 (2019).
Liang, J. et al. Site-occupation-tuned superionic LixScCl3+x halide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7012–7022 (2020).
Liang, J. et al. A series of ternary metal chloride superionic conductors for high‐performance all‐solid‐state lithium batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2103921 (2022).
Wang, K. et al. A cost-effective and humidity-tolerant chloride solid electrolyte for lithium batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–11 (2021).
Plass, M. A., Bette, S., Dinnebier, R. E. & Lotsch, B. V. Enhancement of superionic conductivity by halide substitution in strongly stacking faulted Li3HoBr6–xIx phases. Chem. Mater. 34, 3227–3235 (2022).
Park, K.-H. et al. High-voltage superionic halide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 533–539 (2020).
Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751–767 (1976).
Bohnsack, A. et al. Ternäre Halogenide vom Typ A3MX6. VI [1]. Ternäre Chloride der Selten‐Erd‐Elemente mit Lithium, Li3MCl6 (M = Tb□ Lu, Y, Sc): synthese, Kristallstrukturen und Ionenbewegung. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 623, 1067–1073 (1997).
Liu, Z. et al. High ionic conductivity achieved in Li3Y(Br3Cl3) mixed halide solid electrolyte via promoted diffusion pathways and enhanced grain boundary. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 298–304 (2020).
Bohnsack, A., Balzer, G., Güdel, H. U., Wickleder, M. S. & Meyer, G. Ternäre Halogenide vom Typ A3MX6. VII [1]. Die Bromide Li3MBr6 (M= Sm□ Lu, Y): synthese, Kristallstruktur, Ionenbeweglichkeit. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 623, 1352–1356 (1997).
Park, J. et al. Heat treatment protocol for modulating ionic conductivity via structural evolution of Li3-xYb1-xMxCl6 (M= Hf4+, Zr4+) new halide superionic conductors for all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 425, 130630 (2021).
Helm, B. et al. Exploring aliovalent substitutions in the Lithium Halide superionic conductor Li3–xIn1–xZrxCl6 (0≤ x≤ 0.5). Chem. Mater. 33, 4773–4782 (2021).
Asano, T. et al. Solid halide electrolytes with high lithium‐ion conductivity for application in 4 V class bulk‐type all‐solid‐state batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803075 (2018).
Kwak, H. et al. Li+ conduction in aliovalent-substituted monoclinic Li2ZrCl6 for all-solid-state batteries: Li2+xZr1-xMxCl6 (M= In, Sc). Chem. Eng. J. 437, 135413 (2022).
Li, X. et al. Air-stable Li3InCl6 electrolyte with high voltage compatibility for all-solid-state batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2665–2671 (2019).
Shi, X. et al. Fast Li-ion conductor of Li3HoBr6 for stable all-solid-state Lithium–sulfur battery. Nano. Lett. 21, 9325–9331 (2021).
Yu, T. et al. Superionic fluorinated halide solid electrolytes for highly stable Li‐metal in all‐solid‐state Li batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2101915 (2021).
Adelstein, N. & Wood, B. C. Role of dynamically frustrated bond disorder in a Li+ superionic solid electrolyte. Chem. Mater. 28, 7218–7231 (2016).
Li, X. et al. Origin of superionic Li3Y1–xInxCl6 Halide Solid Electrolytes with high humidity tolerance. Nano Lett. 20, 4384–4392 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22379127 [J.W.L.], 52176185[T.M.]), the Guangdong High-level Innovation Institute project (2021B0909050001 [J.W.L.]), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Canada Research Chair Program (CRC), Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), Ontario Research Fund, the University of Western Ontario, and Eastern Institute of Techonology, Ningbo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.L., J.W.L., and X.S. conceived the project. X.L., J.K., C.Z., Y.X., T.M., and R.L. performed the electrolyte synthesis and electrochemical performance characterizations. X.L., J.L., and J.K. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. J.W.L. and X.S. supervised the project. All the authors participated in the reviewing and editing of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Kim, J.T., Luo, J. et al. Structural regulation of halide superionic conductors for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Nat Commun 15, 53 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43886-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43886-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.