Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Opinion
  • Published:

To switch or to change class—the biologic dilemma in rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

The management of rheumatoid arthritis has greatly improved in the past decade, owing to new treatment strategies and the introduction of agents that inhibit tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Unfortunately, a substantial proportion of patients will discontinue therapy with their first TNF inhibitor for various reasons (for example, non-response, loss of efficacy, or toxicity). Until recently, treatment options for these patients were limited and most rheumatologists chose to switch to treatment with an alternative TNF inhibitor. However, biologic agents with different modes of action have now become available. Hence, the dilemma now facing rheumatologists presented with patients who fail to respond to anti-TNF therapy is whether to switch to an alternative TNF inhibitor or to change to a biologic agent of a different drug class. This article discusses the evidence relating to these two options.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Redlich, K. et al. Rheumatoid arthritis therapy after tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 blockade. Arthritis Rheum. 48, 3308–3319 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyrich, K. L. et al. Outcomes after switching from one anti-tumor necrosis factor α agent to a second anti-tumor necrosis factor α agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a large UK national cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 56, 13–20 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomez-Reino, J. J. & Carmona, L. Switching TNF antagonists in patients with chronic arthritis: an observational study of 488 patients over a four-year period. Arthritis Res. Ther. 8, R29 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buch, M. H. et al. True infliximab resistance in rheumatoid arthritis: a role for lymphotoxin α? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 63, 1344–1346 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smolen, J. S. et al. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (GO-AFTER study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet 374, 210–221 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Genovese, M. C. et al. Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to tumor necrosis factor α inhibition. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1114–1123 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, S. B. et al. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum. 54, 2793–2806 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Emery, P. et al. IL-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab improves treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF biologics: results from a 24-week multicentre randomised placebo controlled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 67, 1516–1523 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smolen, J. et al. Golimumab is efficacious in anti-TNF agent experienced patients with active rheumatoid arthritis regardless of type of agent or reason for discontinuation of prior anti-TNF agent: result from the GO-AFTER Study [abstract]. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68 (Suppl. 3), 242 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Villeneuve, E. & Haraoui, B. Switching between TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Adv. Rheumatol. 4, 2–8 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bombardieri, S. et al. Effectiveness of adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with a history of TNF-antagonist therapy in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46, 1191–1199 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Remy, A., Avouac, J., Gossec, L. & Combe, B. Clinical pertinence of the switch to a second TNF inhibitor after failure of a first one in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis [abstract]. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68 (Suppl. 3), 230 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Furst, D. E. et al. Open-label, pilot protocol of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switch to infliximab after an incomplete response to etanercept: the OPPOSITE study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 66, 893–899 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Navarro-Sarabia, F. et al. DAS-28-based EULAR response and HAQ improvement in rheumatoid arthritis patients switching between TNF antagonists. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 10, 91 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karlsson, J. A. et al. Treatment response to a second or third TNF-inhibitor in RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47, 507–513 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Keystone, E., Aranda, R., Becker, A.-C., Covucci, A. & Genovese, M. C. Abatacept provides clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who previously demonstrated a lack of response or no response to one or more anti-TNF therapies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 54 (Suppl.), S406 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schiff, M. H. et al. The 6-month safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent a washout after anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy or were directly switched to abatacept: the ARRIVE trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68, 1708–1714 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kremer, J. M. et al. Repeat treatment with rituximab in active RA patients: long-term efficacy in patients with one versus two or more prior TNF inhibitors [abstract]. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 66 (Suppl. II), 432 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keystone, E. C. et al. Rituximab inhibits structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68, 216–221 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Genovese, M. C. et al. Efficacy and safety of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 67, 547–554 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Keystone, E. et al. Safety and efficacy of additional courses of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label extension analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 56, 3896–3908 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Vollenhoven, R. F., Cullinane Carli, C., Augustsson, J. & Klareskog, L. Experience with rituximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); results from the STURE registry [abstract]. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 67 (Suppl. II), 340 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Finckh, A. et al. B cell depletion may be more effective than switching to an alternative anti-tumor necrosis factor agent in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. Arthritis Rheum. 56, 1417–1423 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Finckh, A. et al. Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69, 387–393 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Venkatachalam, S. et al. Rituximab may be more effective than switching to an alternative TNF inhibitor in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have failed other TNF inhibitors [abstract]. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47 (Suppl. 2), ii31 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Buch, M. H. et al. Is switching to rituximab more effective than switching to an alternative tumour necrosis factor blocking therapy (TNF-BT) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have failed a previous TNF-BT?—single-centre cohort experience [abstract]. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68 (Suppl. 3), 574 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chatzidionysiou, K., Carl, C. & van Vollenhoven, R. F. Rituximab versus anti-TNF in patients who previously failed one or more anti-TNFs in an observational cohort: the SARASTRA Study [abstract]. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68 (Suppl. 3), 445 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boulos Haraoui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

B. Haraoui has acted as a consultant for and received grants or research support from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Schering and Wyeth. E. Villeneuve declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villeneuve, E., Haraoui, B. To switch or to change class—the biologic dilemma in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6, 301–305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.45

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.45

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing