Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Preferential eruption of andesitic magmas through recharge filtering

Abstract

Andesitic volcanic rocks are common in subduction zones and are argued to play an important role in the formation and evolution of the continental crust at convergent margins1,2,3,4. Andesite formation is dominated by mixing between iron- and magnesium-rich (mafic) magmas and silica-rich (felsic) magmas1,2,4. The abundance of andesites in many subduction zones suggests they erupt in preference to the magmas that mix to produce them4; however, the reasons for this remain unclear. Here we use textural and geochemical analyses of andesites from Mount Hood, Oregon, to show that eruptions are closely linked with episodes of mafic recharge—the intrusion of mafic magma into a shallow felsic magma reservoir. The felsic and mafic magmas involved rarely erupt by themselves, probably because the former are too viscous and the latter too dense. Mafic recharge overcomes these barriers to eruption, and, as it also promotes efficient mixing, results in preferential eruption of mixed andesitic magmas. The abundance of andesites therefore relates to local crustal conditions and the ability of magmas to erupt. We suggest that volcanoes, such as Mount Hood, that erupt homogeneous andesitic compositions through time are those that are the most reliant on mafic recharge to initiate eruptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: SiO2 abundance in melt inclusions and rocks from convergent margin volcanoes and the composition and physical properties of lavas from Mount Hood.
Figure 2: CSDs and compositions of Mount Hood lavas.
Figure 3: FeO* versus anorthite content for plagioclase from Mount Hood lavas.
Figure 4: Backscattered electron images and compositional profiles for selected Population 2 plagioclase from Mount Hood.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, A. T. Magma mixing: Petrological process and volcanological tool. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1, 3–33 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eichelberger, J. C. Andesitic volcanism and crustal evolution. Nature 275, 21–27 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudnick, R. L. Making continental-crust. Nature 378, 571–578 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reubi, O. & Blundy, J. A dearth of intermediate melts at subduction zone volcanoes and the petrogenesis of arc andesites. Nature 461, 1269–1273 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marsh, B. D. On the crystallinity, probability of occurrence, and rheology of lava and magma. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 78, 85–98 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eichelberger, J. C., Izbekov, P. E. & Browne, B. L. Bulk chemical trends at arc volcanoes are not liquid lines of descent. Lithos 87, 135–154 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, W. E. et al. Geologic History of Mount Hood Volcano, Oregon: A Field-Trip Guidebook 1–38 (US Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., Vol. 97(263), 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cribb, J. W. & Barton, M. Significance of crustal and source region processes on the evolution of compositionally similar calc-alkaline lavas, Mt Hood, Oregon. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 76, 229–249 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Darr, C. M. Magma Chamber Processes Over the Past 475,000 Years at Mount Hood, Oregon: Insights From Crystal Zoning and Crystal Size Distribution Studies. M.S. thesis, Oregon State Univ. (2006).

  10. Woods, M. M. Compositional and Mineralogical Relationships Between Mafic Inclusions and Host Lavas as Key to Andesite Petrogenesis at Mount Hood Volcano, Oregon. M.S. thesis, Portland State Univ. (2004).

  11. Higgins, M. D. & Roberge, J. Three magmatic components in the 1973 eruption of Eldfell volcano, Iceland: Evidence from plagioclase crystal size distribution (CSD) and geochemistry. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 161, 247–260 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salisbury, M. J., Bohrson, W. A., Clynne, M. A., Ramos, F. C. & Hoskin, P. Origin of the 1915 Lassen Peak eruption by magma mixing: Evidence for formation of chemically distinct plagioclase populations from crystal size distributions and in situ chemical data. J. Petrol. 49, 1755–1780 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sparks, S. R. J., Sigurdsson, H. & Wilson, L. Magma mixing—mechanism for triggering acid explosive eruptions. Nature 267, 315–318 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eichelberger, J. C. Vesiculation of mafic magma during replenishment of silicic magma reservoirs. Nature 288, 446–450 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy, M. D. et al. The role of magma mixing in triggering the current eruption at the Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat, West Indies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 3433–3436 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watts, R. B., de Silva, S. L., de Rios, G. J. & Croudace, I. Effusive eruption of viscous silicic magma triggered and driven by recharge: A case study of the Cerro Chascon-Runtu Jarita Dome Complex in Southwest Bolivia. Bull. Volcanol. 61, 241–264 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sparks, R. S. J. & Marshall, L. A. Thermal and mechanical constraints on mixing between mafic and silicic magmas. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 29, 99–124 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinel, V. & Jaupart, C. The effect of edifice load on magma ascent beneath a volcano. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh 358, 1515–1532 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martel, C., Ali, A. R., Poussineau, S., Gourgaud, A. & Pichavant, M. Basalt-inherited microlites in silicic magmas: Evidence from Mount Pelee (Martinique, French West Indies). Geology 34, 905–908 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Browne, B. L. et al. Magma mingling as indicated by texture and Sr/Ba ratios of plagioclase phenocrysts from Unzen volcano, SW Japan. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 154, 103–116 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Halama, R. et al. Pre-eruptive crystallization conditions of mafic and silicic magmas at the Plat Pays volcanic complex, Dominica (Lesser Antilles). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 153, 200–220 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clynne, M. A. et al. in A Volcano Rekindled; the Renewed Eruption of Mount St. Helens, 2004–2006. Vol. 1750 (eds Sherrod, D. R., Scott, W. E. &Stauffer, P. H.) (US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pallister, J. S., Hoblitt, R. P., Crandell, D. R. & Mullineaux, D. R. Mount St. Helens a decade after the 1980 eruptions: Magmatic models, chemical cycles, and a revised hazards assessment. Bull. Volcanol. 54, 126–146 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins, M. D. Measurement of crystal size distributions. Am. Mineral. 85, 1105–1116 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Costa, F., Chakraborty, S. & Dohmen, R. Diffusion coupling between trace and major elements and a model for calculation of magma residence times using plagioclase. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 2189–2200 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scaillet, B., Holtz, F. & Pichavant, M. Phase equilibrium constraints on the viscosity of silicic magmas 1. Volcanic–plutonic comparison. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 27257–27266 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Giordano, D., Russell, J. K. & Dingwell, D. B. Viscosity of magmatic liquids: A model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271, 123–134 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bottinga, Y. & Weill, D. F. Densities of liquid silicate systems calculated from partial molar volumes of oxide components. Am. J. Sci. 269, 169–182 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kent, A. J. R. et al. Vapor transfer prior to the October 2004 eruption of Mount St Helens, Washington. Geology 35, 231–234 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lundgaard, K. L. & Tegner, C. Partitioning of ferric and ferrous iron between plagioclase and silicate melt. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 147, 470–483 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (EAR-0838421) to A.J.R.K. and K.M.C. and by a USGS Kleinman grant to A.M.K. A.J.R.K. is also grateful for extra support from the University of Aarhus. F. Tepley, A. Weinsteiger and A. Ungerer provided extra assistance with electron microprobe and laser-ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analyses. W. Bohrson provided assistance with CSD measurements and useful discussions. Comments by F. Costa, P. Ruprecht, O. Bachmann, E. Brook, A. Meigs and D. Wildenschild improved an initial version of this manuscript. W. Scott and C. Gardner of the USGS David A. Johnston Cascade Volcano Observatory provided invaluable assistance with sample collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.D. provided initial data from Mount Hood as part of a MS thesis at Oregon State University. C.D. and M.J.S. carried out CSD measurements; A.J.R.K. and A.M.K. obtained mineral chemistry data. A.J.R.K., C.D., A.M.K. and K.M.C. conducted field studies and sampling. All authors provided input to discussion and A.J.R.K. took the lead on writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam J. R. Kent.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 666 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kent, A., Darr, C., Koleszar, A. et al. Preferential eruption of andesitic magmas through recharge filtering. Nature Geosci 3, 631–636 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo924

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo924

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing