Main

Gastric ulcer healing is a complicated but finely regulated process, and serves as a good model for studying the molecular mechanism of tissue regeneration.1, 2 In the early stage of this process, signaling pathways, which transduce proliferation signal from the site of the injury to the gastric progenitor cells, would be engaged. At the end of the pathways would be growth factors that directly interact with the progenitor cells. These factors are particularly important because they initiate and maintain progenitor cell proliferation, which is fundamental for reconstruction of the epithelial portion of gastric tissue; however, there is little information about their molecular nature.

In 1988, RegI was isolated as a growth factor crucial for pancreatic regeneration and was given the name (for regenerating gene).3 We previously examined the temporal and spatial patterns of expression of several factors in experimental gastric ulcers in the rat, and tested their effects in in vitro culture systems for gastric cells. These studies delineated one of above gastric signaling pathways, at the end of which is located RegI.4, 5, 6, 7 At the beginning of the pathway, a proinflammatory cytokine CINC2β (the rat counterpart of human interleukin 8) is secreted from the injured gastric mucosal epithelial cells located around the ulcer margin.6, 7 This factor is then delivered to enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells, a class of enteroendocrine cells located deep in the basal portion of the gastric gland. In response to the cytokine stimuli, the ECL cells surrounding the ulcerous crater rapidly produce RegI,4 which moves back upward to interact with the gastric progenitor cells and to trigger their proliferation.5 Despite this advance, however, direct in vivo evidence is still lacking for the effect of RegI in the process of gastric ulcer healing.

Recently, we created RegI-transgenic (Tg) mice and showed that RegI has growth-promoting effects on gastric progenitor cells in the process of ‘generation’ of gastric mucosal architecture.8 Previous reports9, 10 showed that the mouse stomach, in contrast to the rat stomach, shows very low levels of RegI expression, providing an ideal experimental system with which to test the effects of the regI transgene. Tg mice of 3 weeks old, just finishing the period of gastric gland morphogenesis, showed apparent gastric mucosal hypertrophy and elevated expression of a cell proliferation marker, compared with littermate controls.8 Thus, we now have an experimental system in which to test the function of RegI in gastric ulcer healing (gastric mucosal ‘regeneration’) in vivo. In this study, using Reg-Tg mice, we asked whether the transgene accelerates the healing of experimental gastric ulcers. The data provide the first in vivo evidence that RegI has a crucial role in gastric ulcer healing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tg Animals

All studies with mice were approved by the Shimane University ethics committee for animal experimentation. As described in our previous report,8 the vector used to express the rat RegI protein was constructed by modifying the plasmid pEGFP-N1 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), which contains the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene under the control of the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoter. The CMV promoter region spans from nucleotide number 1 to 589 in the plasmid vector. The enhancer region lies from 59 to 465, TATA box from 554 to 560 and the transcription start site at 583. The plasmid was digested by SacII (651) and NotI to remove the GFP sequence, and ligated to the rat regI cDNA fragment obtained by reverse transcriptase PCR from rat stomach RNA. RT-PCR was performed using the following primers that contain the sequence flanking the rat Reg-coding region: 5′-GCAGAGATTGTTGACTTGCA-3′ and 5′-GATAGATGGTCTAGTTTCAC-3′. The resultant vector plasmid was digested by AseI and AflII to release the fragment containing the human CMV immediate early promoter, the rat cDNA sequence covering the coding region and the SV40 polyA signal sequence. The fragment was separated by an agarose gel and purified using MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan). RegI-Tg mice (Reg+/−) were generated by injection of the DNA fragment into fertilized eggs obtained from BDF1 female mice. The progeny mice were bred with BDF1 wild-type (Wt) mice (Nihon Clea, Tokyo, Japan), not with C57BL/6 or DBA, to efficiently obtain a large battery of reg+/− Tg and Wt littermate pairs. All mice were housed in standard cages with 12-h cycles of light and dark, and had ad libitum access to normal mouse chow and water.

Histopathological Analysis

The protocol for immunohistochemistry is described in our previous report.9 The following primary antibodies were used in this study: monoclonal mouse IgG2a anti-mouse proliferating cell nuclear antigen (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (1:1000) and monoclonal mouse IgG2a anti-rat RegI antibody (1:50).11 For double staining of Tg RegI protein and chromogranin A, the tissue slides were first stained for RegI as described above. Following pretreatment with 1% normal goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the tissue sections were incubated with anti-chromogranin A polyclonal antibody for 2 h at room temperature. The sections were washed with PBS, then incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma) at room temperature for 30 min. Bound chromogranin A–antibody complex was detected using an avidin-biotin peroxidase method (ABC Kit). Peroxidase activity was detected by incubating the samples with BCIP/NBT solution (DAKO) for 10 min at room temperature, then counter staining with hematoxylin. After dehydration in a graded alcohol series, the sections were cleared in xylene.

Formation of Gastric Mucosal Lesions Induced by Water-Immersion and Restraint Stress

Adult male and female mice (9–15 week old) were used in the experiments. Before each experiment, animals were deprived of food but not water for 24 h. The animals were then placed in restraint cages and immersed in a water bath (25°C) to the level of the xiphoid process for 24 h as previously described.12, 13 After the experiments, the animals were anesthetized and killed by cervical vertebral dislocation. Their stomachs were immediately removed and inflated with 2 ml of 1% formalin solution for 10 min. After opening along the greater curvature, gastric injury visible to the naked eye was found in the gastric mucosa as elongated black-red lines (1–10 mm long by 0.5–1.5 mm wide) parallel to the long axis of the stomach in mice. The lines that resisted a strict washing by distilled water were distinguished from mere blood adhesion and were defined as erosions. The length (in millimeters) of each erosion was measured and cumulated as the ulcer index (UI) (in millimeters). This method for measuring mice and rats gastric ulcerative lesions was developed by Brodie and Hanson 14 and has been widely used as a reliable method in many laboratories15, 16, 17 including ours.13

Formation of Gastric Mucosal Lesions Induced by HCL/Ethanol

The method is based on modifications of the method reported by Sun et al.18 Adult male and female mice (9–15 week old) were used. We checked the UI 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after HCl/ethanol injection to generate a time course. Before each experiment, animals were deprived of food and water for 24 h. The animals received 0.2 ml of 0.2 M HCl/40% ethanol orally. The animals were killed at each time point and their stomachs were processed as described in the previous section to obtain the UI.

Isolation of Total RNA, RT and Real-Time Quantitative PCR

For isolation of total RNA, the stomachs of Wt mice or Tg mice at the indicated time points were excised and stored in RNA later (Qiagen). Extraction of RNA from tissue samples stored in RNA later was performed by using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) as described by the manufacturer. Extracted RNA (400 ng) was reverse transcribed into first-strand cDNA using the ProSTAR First-Strand RT-PCR Kit (Stratagene). Quantitative evaluation of c-fos, c-myc, rat regI, and IL-1β, TNF-α and CXCL2 mRNA expression in the stomachs of Wt or Tg mice was performed by real-time quantitative PCR. C-fos cDNA was amplified with PCR primers 5′-ATCCGAAGGGAACGGAATAAG-3′ and 5′-CAGACTTCTCATCTTCAAGTTGATCTG-3′; C-myc cDNA was amplified with the primers 5′-AGCTGTTTGAAGGCTGGATTTC-3′ and 5′-CTGTTGGTGAAGTTCACGTTGAG-3′; and rat RegI cDNA was amplified with the primers 5′-GGACACTGGGTATCCTAACAATTCC-3′ and 5′-CTCTCCATTTCTTGTATCCTGAGTTTG-3′. IL-1β cDNA was amplified with PCR primers 5′-AGGCTCCGAGATGAACAACA-3′ and 5′-TTGGGATCCACACTCTCCA-3′; TNF-α cDNA was amplified with PCR primers 5′-GAGGGGAATCCTTGGAAGA-3′ and 5′-CTTGGGCCAGTGAGTGAAAG-3′; and CXCL2 cDNA was amplified with PCR primers 5′-GCTGTCAATGCCTGAAGACC-3′ and 5′-GGTCAGTTAGCCTTGCCTTT-3′. As an internal control, mouse β-actin cDNA was amplified with the primers 5′-CGTGAAAAGATGACCCAGATCA-3′ and 5′-CACAGCCTGGATGGCTACGTA-3′. Mouse GAPDH cDNA was amplified with the primers 5′-ACCCAGAAGACTGTGGATGG-3′ and 5′-GGTCCTCAGTGTACCCAAG-3′. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed with an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and following the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems), except for the annealing temperature, which was 56°C for 20 s in our experiments. To exclude amplification of contaminating genomic DNA, all primers used in this study were carefully selected on different exons. We also included no-enzyme controls during RT, and no-template controls during PCR to check against possible contaminations. The relative expression levels of these genes, normalized against mouse β-actin expression or mouse GAPDH expression, were estimated with Q-Gene-analysis (Biotechnique Software, Westborough, MA, USA).

Measurements of Serum Gastrin and Gastric Acid Secretion

After deprivation of food for 24 h, blood was collected by cardiac puncture. Serum was stored at −20°C until assayed for gastrin (Gastrin-RIA kit II; Kyowa Medex, Tokyo, Japan). Basal gastric acid output (BAO) and secretagogue-stimulated gastric acid output (MAO) in Wt and Tg mice were examined with the pylorus-ligation method. After deprivation of food for 22 h and water for 2 h before experimentation, mice were subjected to epigastric laparotomy under light ether anesthesia. The duodenum was identified and the junction between the pylorus and duodenum was picked up gently. The stomach itself was not disturbed. The pylorus was ligated with 4-0 silk, care being taken to avoid damage to blood vessels or traction on the stomach. The abdominal cavity was closed by suturing with 4-0 silk (BAO) or after intraperitoneal injection of gastrin (Gastrin I human; Sigma-Aldrich Japan, Tokyo, Japan), the volume of which depended on body weight. After 4 h, stomachs were removed, and the gastric lumen was washed with 3.0 ml of saline solution (pH 7.0). The gastric contents plus the washout solution were collected and centrifuged (3500 r.p.m., 10 min, 4°C), then the volumes of supernatant and of solids were recorded. If the volume of solids was over 60 mg, the animal was discarded because of possible contamination of gastric contents with food residue or feces. Only the supernatant was used in the analysis. The acidity of the supernatant was determined by titration against 0.01 mM NaOH to pH 7.0. Gastric acid output (volume × acidity) was expressed as micromoles H+ per 4 h.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical significance of differences was evaluated with Student's t-test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Normal Gastric Mucosa from Adult Wt Mice and Tg Mice Before Ulcer Induction

In this study, we used 9- to 15-week-old adult littermate pairs for ulcer experiments. As a first step, we examined RegI expression and histological appearance of their stomachs before ulcer induction.

In the stomachs of the adult Wt mice, we were unable to detect any RegI-specific signals by immunohistochemistry, whereas a significant level of RegI expression was seen in the tissue of RegI-Tg mice (compare Wt control and Tg control in Figure 5a).

In spite of the difference of RegI expression, we found no histological difference in the gastric mucosa between Wt and Tg mice in the adult stage, in contrast to the infant stage8 in which Tg mice showed significant gastric hypertrophy and higher proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression compared with their Wt littermates. As shown in Figure 1a, HE staining of the fundic mucosa of 10-week-old Wt and Tg mice revealed no difference. In addition, the intensities and the locations of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen signals were almost the same in Wt and Tg mice (Figure 1b). To explore whether the difference between infant and adult could have resulted from a putative age-related decrease of transgene expression level, quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed for the Tg regI gene. As shown in Figure 1c, there was no age-related decrease of the transgene, suggesting that the difference may be attributed in differences in tissue responsiveness to RegI.

Figure 1
figure 1

Morphological appearance of the stomach of adult transgenic (Tg) mouse and wild-type (Wt) littermate, and expression of the transgene (rat regI gene) at infant and adult stages without ulcer induction. (a) HE staining and (b) PCNA staining of the fundic mucosas of 10-week-old adult Tg mouse and Wt littermate. (c) Total RNA was extracted from stomachs of infant (3 weeks old) and adult (9 weeks old) Tg mice and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR for expression of rat regI gene. Mean values±s.e.m. at each time point, normalized to the internal references (GAPDH). N=10 for infant mice, 7 for adult mice.

Gastric Mucosal Lesions Induced by Water-Immersion Stress

Adult Tg and Wt littermate pairs were subjected to water-immersion stress and their stomachs were examined macroscopically for erosions. For all the littermate pairs tested, the UI of the Tg mice was less than that of the Wt mice at the end of water-immersion and restraint stress (Figure 2a). The mean index values were 8.3 for Tg mice and 23.7 for Wt mice, respectively (Figure 2a). Therefore, the transgene reduced the UI by two-thirds. To examine Tg regI gene (rat regI) expression in Tg mice, real-time RT-PCR was performed. In the Tg stomachs, expression of Tg regI gene was enhanced significantly after water-immersion stress (Figure 2b). In the Wt stomachs, no signal for endogenous mouse regI expression was detected in the same experiment, as the PCR primers were designed to anneal only to Tg rat sequence (data not shown).

Figure 2
figure 2

The ulcer index (UI) and expression of the transgene (rat regI gene) following exposure to water-immersion stress. (a) Adult gender-matched littermate pairs of Wt and Tg mice were exposed to 24 h of water-immersion stress and their stomachs were scored for cumulative length of gastric erosions (UI). Values for each pair of littermates (each connected by thin dashed line) and mean values for Wt mice (stippled box) and Tg mice (filled box) are presented. N=6 pairs. *P<0.05. (b) Total RNA was extracted from adult Tg stomachs with (24 h) or without (0 h) water-immersion stress and was analyzed using quantitative RT-PCR for expression of rat regI gene. Mean values±s.e.m. at each time point, normalized to the internal references (GAPDH). N=7 for 0 h, 12 for 24 h. *P<0.05.

Gastric Mucosal Lesions Induced by HCL/Ethanol and the Time Course of Healing

Adult Tg and Wt littermate pairs were given HCl/ethanol and examined for erosions at 6, 12, 18 or 24 h after gavage. Almost all the littermate pairs (each linked by a thin dashed line in Figure 3) showed the superiority of Tg mice compared with Wt mice in the ability of decreasing UI (Figure 3a; right three columns), except for the pairs examined after 6 h. Almost the opposite result was obtained for the 6 h pairs, in which Tg showed a higher index (Figure 3a; the leftmost column). The thick dotted line (Wt) and thick solid line (Tg) in Figure 3a show the time course of the average index values. In this experimental system, the injury phase seems to last around 6 h and the recovery phase should begin after 12 h. The mean UI value of Wt mice reached a maximum of 34.7 at 12 h, then rapidly declined particularly between 12 and 18 h. This decrease of index in Wt should be attributed to the upregulation of endogenous growth mediators, including RegI itself (see Figure 5a) and other factors. For Tg mice, a higher index was observed compared with that of Wt in the injury phase (6 h), indicating more severe injury. At 12 h, the beginning of the recovery phase, this was reversed and Tg showed a lower index, suggesting faster initiation of the healing process. From this time point onward, Tg mice showed a significantly lower index, indicating a higher potential for ulcer healing. Figures 3b and c shows representative photographs of the stomachs from female littermate groups subjected to the time-course study.

Figure 3
figure 3

The ulcer index (UI) following HCl/ethanol treatment. (a) Adult, gender-matched littermate pairs of Wt and Tg mice were orally administered HCl/ethanol, killed 6, 12, 18 or 24 h after gavage and their stomachs were scored for cumulative length of gastric erosions (UI). Values for each pair of littermates (each connected by thin dashed line) and mean values at each time point for Wt mice (stippled boxes connected by thick dotted line) and Tg mice (filled boxes connected by thick solid line) are presented. Number and gender of experimental animals were as follows. For 6 h, n=9 pairs (5 male pairs, 4 female pairs); for 12 h, n=12 pairs (6 male pairs, 6 female pairs); for 18 h, n=11 pairs (6 male pairs, 5 female pairs); for 24 h, n=10 pairs (5 male pairs, 5 female pairs). *P<0.05. (b) Representative macroscopic appearance of gastric mucosa at each time point (a group of female littermates). (c) Representative macroscopic appearance of gastric mucosa at 6 h examined at high magnification (female Wt mice).

Time-Course Analysis of C-Fos and C-Myc Expression During Healing of the HCL/Ethanol Induced Lesion

Using c-fos and c-myc proto-oncogenes as an indicator of cell proliferation,19, 20 we assessed the relative proportion of cells, which were proliferating in whole stomachs after treatment with HCl/ethanol in the above experiment (Figure 3), using real-time RT-PCR method. C-fos gene is an immediate early gene and its upregulation precedes cell proliferation. In the Wt mouse, c-fos gene expression reached a maximum at 6 h, before the initiation of the recovery phase, then decreased gradually (Figure 4a). The temporal pattern of expression of c-fos gene in Tg stomach was similar; however, the expression levels were significantly higher in Tg, especially at 12 h (Figure 4a). On the other hand, c-myc gene expression, which is known to be elevated at a later phase of cell proliferation, was expressed at slightly higher levels in Tg stomachs than in Wt stomachs particularly at 12 and 18 h; however, the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 4b).

Figure 4
figure 4

Expression levels of cell proliferation marker genes following the HCl/ethanol treatment. Total RNA was extracted from the stomachs of mice subjected to HCl/ethanol treatment and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR for expression of c-fos and c-myc genes, general markers for cell proliferation. Mean values±s.e.m. at each time point for c-fos gene (a) and c-myc gene (b), normalized to the internal references (β-actin). N=6 pairs per time point. *P<0.05.

RegI Expression During Healing of the HCL/Ethanol-Induced Lesions

Expression of RegI protein in the stomachs was assessed by immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal antibody11 that equally recognizes rat (transgenic) and mouse (endogenous) RegI proteins. Before administration of HCl/ethanol, no RegI signal was detected in the gastric glands in the Wt stomachs (Figure 5a Wt control). After gastric lesions were induced, the signal appeared in the cells located around the ulcer beds (Figure 5a Wt HCl/ethanol), consistent with our previous observations4 in the rat. In the case of Tg mouse, the control stomach showed higher signals compared with Wt (Figure 5a Tg control). Unexpectedly, Tg also showed elevated signal intensity after HCl/ethanol gavage. Around the lesion induced in Tg stomach, still more intensive signals were seen than those in Tg control stomach (Figure 5a Tg HCl/ethanol).

Figure 5
figure 5

Expression of RegI and various cytokines before and after HCl/ethanol treatment. (a) Stomachs were obtained before (control) and 6 h after HCl/ethanol administration. Tissue was fixed and analyzed by immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal antibody,11 which recognizes transgenic and endogenous RegI proteins to equal extent. (b) Total RNA was extracted from Tg stomachs subjected to HCl/ethanol treatment and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR for expression of the rat regI gene (transgene). Mean values±s.e.m. at each time point, normalized to the internal references (β-actin). N=6 pairs per time point. (c) Total RNA was extracted from Tg stomachs subjected to HCl/ethanol treatment and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR for expression of CXCL2, IL1-β or TNF-α. Mean values±s.e.m. at each time point, normalized to the internal references (GAPDH). N=6 per time point. (d) The Tg stomachs before HCl/ethanol administration were stained with anti-chromogranin A antibody (upper-left panel) and the anti-RegI antibody (upper-right panel). The lower panel shows the results of immunohistochemical double staining for chromogranin A (purple) and RegI (brown). The white arrow indicates a cell with pure chromogranin A signal (purple) and the black arrow indicates a cell with mixed signal (black).

To examine the time course of Tg regI gene (rat regI) expression in Tg mice more quantitatively, real-time RT-PCR was used. In Tg stomachs, baseline expression of Tg regI gene was enhanced significantly 6 h after the HCl/ethanol gavage, then gradually decreased over the next 18 h to return to basal levels (Figure 5b). In the Wt stomachs, no signal for endogenous mouse regI expression was detected (data not shown), as was in the case of water-immersion stress experiment (Figure 2b). Using the same templates, the time course of several cytokines, which may be responsible for upregulation of regI gene, were examined. The cytokines, CXCL2, IL1-β and TNFα were upregulated 6 h after the HCl/ethanol gavage (Figure 5c).

Finally, the precise location of transgene expression in Tg stomachs before administration of HCl/ethanol was examined. Using sequential slice samples, location of the RegI signals was compared with that of signals of chromogranin A, a marker of endocrine cells. The chromogranin A signals were detected in the small cells located in the deep portion of the fundic grand, presumably indicating ECL cells (Figure 5d upper-left panel). On the other hand, the RegI signals were detected mainly in the cells of the same morphology and location (Figure 5d upper-right panel). These data suggest that the main site of expression for Tg RegI is ECL cell. Additional faint signals were seen for Tg RegI in other larger cell types, which may have morphological characteristics of chief cells (Figure 5d upper-right panel). Double staining for chromogranin A and Tg RegI was also performed (Figure 5d lower panel). The Tg RegI signals (brown) showed patchy distribution. In the RegI signal-negative glands, pure signals of chromogranin A (purple) were identified in small cells indicating ECL cells (white arrow). In the grand with RegI signals, double-stained (black) cell with morphological characteristics of ECL cell (black arrow) were identified, showing colocalization of chromogranin A and Tg RegI.

Gastric Acid Secretion and Serum Gastrin Concentration

To assess gastric acid secretion, we examined the basal acid output (BAO) and maximum acid output (MAO) of adult Tg and Wt mice. As shown in Figure 6a, both BAO and MAO values of Tg mice were slightly higher than those of Wt; however, there was no statistical difference. Also, there was no significant difference in serum gastrin concentration between Tg and Wt mice (Figure 6b).

Figure 6
figure 6

Basal acid output (BAO), maximum acid output (MAO) and serum gastrin concentration in Wt and Tg mice. (a) Adult, gender-matched littermate pairs of Wt and Tg mice without water-immersion stress or HCl/ethanol gavage were examined with the pylorus-ligation method for BAO (n=7 pairs) and secretagogue-stimulated gastric acid output (MAO) (n=8 pairs). Results are expressed as mean values±1 s.d. (b) Serum from adult, gender-matched littermate pairs of Wt and Tg mice without water-immersion stress or HCl/ethanol gavage were examined for gastrin concentration (n=6 pairs). Results are expressed as mean values±1 s.d.

DISCUSSION

Genetically engineered mice provide direct and compelling in vivo evidence for a function of a molecule. In this study, we induced experimental gastric ulcers in RegI-Tg mice and found that gastric ulcer healing was accelerated compared with their Wt littermates. This is the first in vivo evidence that RegI contributes to gastric ulcer healing. To our knowledge, among epithelial growth factors, only trefoil factor had been shown by this strategy to be involved in ulcer healing.21 From this point of view, RegI is the second factor to be identified. It will be interesting to clarify in future studies the exact role each factor has in the process of ulcer healing. We used two experimental systems based on different theories to induce ulcer formation (stress-induced and HCl/ethanol-induced) and used a large battery of littermate pairs to reach a definitive conclusion. In both experimental systems and in almost all the littermate pairs tested (with the only exception of the 6 h group in HCl/ethanol experiment), Tg mice showed lower ulcer indices than Wt (Figures 2 and 3), clearly showing the strong potential of RegI for ulcer healing.

It is important to clarify whether RegI contributes to healing by a cytoprotective mechanism or promotion of growth following physical injury. Several findings in this study favor the latter possibility. First, RegI was shown to exhibit its effect in the recovery phase rather than in the injury phase. Using a large array of littermate pairs, the time courses of ulcer healing in both Wt and Tg mice were precisely delineated and compared (Figure 3a). In the injury phase, the mean index value for Tg was higher than that for Wt. This was reversed in the recovery phase, when Tg showed constant superiority in healing over Wt (Figure 3a). Generally speaking, the recovery phase corresponds to the phase of progenitor cells proliferation, when the cells divide, migrate and differentiate to reconstruct the gastric tissue architecture. As RegI was effective in the recovery phase rather than in the injury phase, it is reasonable to speculate that RegI participates in ulcer healing by stimulating progenitor cell growth. It is unclear why the UI was higher in Tg mice in the early injury phase (6 h). No matter the reason, the data rather argue against RegI-mediated cytoprotection as the underlying mechanism promoting gastric healing. If RegI had used a cytoprotective mechanism, the UI of Tg mice would have been lower than in Wt mice from early in the injury phase. Second, at least, we ruled out the possibility that RegI inhibits gastric acid secretion to contribute to the cytoprotection mechanism. Some other factors, for example epidermal growth factor, have been shown to act as cytoprotective agents by virtue of their inhibitory effects on gastric acid secretion.22, 23 Our current data for gastric acid output did not reveal inhibitory activity by RegI (Figure 6). Third, expression of c-fos gene, which was used as proliferation markers, was significantly higher in Tg than in Wt mice in the time course following HCl/ethanol-induced injury. Throughout the time course, the gene showed higher expression levels in Tg mice (Figures 4a and b). The increase in c-fos gene expression (which is known to precede cell proliferation) was prominent at the beginning of the healing phase (Figure 4a). These data show that the fraction of proliferating cells increased in HCl/ethanol-treated Tg mice in the course of ulcer healing and support the hypothesis that RegI uses a growth-promoting mechanism to contribute to ulcer healing.

We examined the temporal expression pattern of RegI in the HCl/ethanol-treated mice. We found that the expression of the transgene in the stomachs of Tg mice was upregulated in response to HCl/ethanol administration, as well as the expression of the endogenous regI gene in the stomachs of Wt mice (Figure 5). This was an unexpected result because transgene expression was driven by an artificial promoter based on a human CMV (hCMV) promoter sequence, not by the endogenous regI promoter that responds to inflammatory stimuli. However, we found a clear answer to this issue in previous reports.24, 25 Those reports described the responsiveness of the hCMV promoter to various inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and TNF-α. In addition, it is reported that those cytokines are produced from inflammatory sites, functioning as inflammatory mediators in the process of gastric ulcer healing.13, 26, 27, 28 Taken together, it is reasonable to speculate that these inflammatory cytokines were secreted from the site of the injury and delivered to the cells located around the ulcerated craters, resulting in the activation of the Tg promoter (hCMV promoter). We confirmed that these cytokine genes are indeed upregulated in Tg stomachs in response to HCl/ethanol administration (Figure 5c). We also examined spatial expression pattern of RegI in Tg stomach. Unexpectedly again, the Tg RegI expression was mainly directed to the ECL cells, which is the site of expression for endogenous RegI (Figure 5d). The mechanism for this is unclear and should be clarified in future studies. We speculate that there may be a post-transcriptional control mechanism specific to ECL cells, by which the regI mRNA molecule is efficiently translated into RegI protein.

In spite of the different RegI expression levels in Wt and Tg adult (10 weeks old) mice (compare Figure 5a Wt control and Tg control), there was no detectable morphological difference between their gastric tissues (Figures 1a and b). This was advantageous to our investigation because morphological differences would have obscured the function of RegI in ulcer healing. It is unclear why RegI showed its effect only in the infant stage (3-week stage of gastric gland morphogenesis)8 and in the ulcer-healing stage, but did not in the adult stage. It is possible that RegI has specific roles in stages of generation (infant) and regeneration (ulcer healing) of the gastric tissue when the tissue is being constructed from ‘nothing’, and has no role in the stage when the constructed tissue structure is maintained by cell turnover (adult). However, this is only a speculation with no observational support. Difference of the nature of the progenitor cells between these stages must be demonstrated in the future study, focusing particularly on the molecular basis of RegI cell surface receptor function.

It is also unclear how RegI exerts proliferative effects on gastric cells. Tritiated thymidine/EM autoradiographic lineage-tracing studies have delineated the morphological features of the stem cell niche in adult mouse stomach.29 According to these studies, the isthmus part of the gastric gland seems to harbor gastric multipotent stem cells and their committed daughters (progenitor cells), prepit cell precursors, preneck cell precursor and parietal cell progenitors. On the other hand, in our previous study,8 there was an increase in both the number and staining intensity of proliferation-associated markers in the isthmus region of the RegI-Tg mouse. These data suggest that stem cells and/or committed progenitor cells are the targets of RegI function. However, at this time, there is no information about which class of early cells is the direct target of RegI. This issue is important because the gastric cell population was biased to chief cells and parietal cell lineages in the RegI-Tg mouse.8 This bias is easily explained if RegI targeted specific fractions of committed progenitor cells, namely, preneck cell precursors and parietal cell progenitors, which are the origins of chief cells and parietal cells, respectively. In this hypothesis, prepit cell precursors, which are the precursors of pit cells, do not respond to a RegI signal. If, on the contrary, RegI targeted multipotent stem cells, a more interesting but complicated model must be formulated. In this case, RegI likely engages an intracellular signaling pathway that induces asymmetric stem cell division simultaneously with directing differentiation to preneck cell precursors and parietal cell progenitors. This issue needs to be clarified through detailed future studies of the RegI receptor expression pattern among stem cells and committed progenitor cells, and through delineation of downstream signaling pathways.