Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Plasma Cell Disorders

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and subsequent treatments as a comprehensive strategy for long-term survival of multiple myeloma patients

Abstract

We evaluated 71 patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). Forty-three patients (61%) received allo-HCT after the first line of therapy. Fifty-eight patients (82%) had chemosensitive disease at the time of allo-HCT. A HLA-matched related or unrelated donor was available for 68 patients (96%). Non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and peripheral blood hematopoietic cells as a graft source were used in most patients. The cumulative incidence of grade II–IV acute GVHD at day +100 and chronic GVHD at 5 years was 13% (95% CI 7–23%) and 35% (95% CI 24–46), respectively. Non-relapse mortality and relapse/progression incidence at 5 years were 12% (95% CI 5–23) and 65% (95% CI 49–76), respectively. With a median follow-up in survivors of 100 months (range 16–186), the 5-year PFS and OS were 39% (95% CI 27–52) and 60% (95% CI 55–77), respectively. On multivariate analysis: age >55 years was associated with both a reduced PFS (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.15–3.87) and OS (RR 5.53, 95% CI 2.22–13.76); chemorefractory disease at allo-HCT was associated with both reduced PFS (RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.37–7.00) and OS (RR 3.19, 95% CI 1.23–8.22). At relapse, 24 patients (56%) received bortezomib, 28 (65%) lenalidomide, 11 (26%) pomalidomide, 16 (37%) donor lymphocytes infusion as part of salvage therapy after allo-HCT relapse. Median PFS from time of salvage treatment was 7 months (range 0–113 months) for bortezomib-based therapy, 14 months (range 0–79 months) for lenalidomide and 10 months (range 1–28) for pomalidomide. Allo-HCT is a feasible and effective strategy in selected patients with MM and could be an effective platform for subsequent therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donato ML, Siegel DS, Vesole DH, McKiernan P, Nyirenda T, Pecora AL et al. The graft-versus-myeloma effect: chronic graft-versus-host disease but not acute graft-versus-host disease prolongs survival in patients with multiple myeloma receiving allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 1211–1216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salama M, Nevill T, Marcellus D, Parker P, Johnson M, Kirk A et al. Donor leukocyte infusions for multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 1179–1184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stern M, de Wreede LC, Brand R, van Biezen A, Dreger P, Mohty M et al. Sensitivity of hematological malignancies to graft-versus-host effects: an EBMT megafile analysis. Leukemia 2014; 28: 2235–2240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos M-V et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: e538–e548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sorror ML, Giralt S, Sandmaier BM, De Lima M, Shahjahan M, Maloney DG et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index as an outcome predictor for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: combined FHCRC and MDACC experiences. Blood 2007; 110: 4606–4613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rowlings PA, Przepiorka D, Klein JP, Gale RP, Passweg JR, Henslee-Downey PJ et al. IBMTR severity index for grading acute graft-versus-host disease: retrospective comparison with Glucksberg grade. Br J Haematol 1997; 97: 855–864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iacobelli S . Suggestions on the use of statistical methodologies in studies of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48 (March): S1–S37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. StataCorp 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. n.d..

  10. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/.

  11. Montefusco V, Spina F, Patriarca F, Offidani M, Bruno B, Montanari M et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone followed by escalating donor lymphocyte infusions for patients with multiple myeloma relapsing or progressing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19: 424–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Crawley C, Szydlo R, Lalancette M, Bacigalupo A, Lange A, Brune M et al. Outcomes of reduced-intensity transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Blood 2005; 106: 2969–2976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Lavallade H, El-Cheikh J, Faucher C, Fürst S, Stoppa A-M, Coso D et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic SCT as salvage treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 41: 953–960.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Walker I, Panzarella T, Couban S, Couture F, Devins G, Elemary M et al. Pretreatment with anti-thymocyte globulin versus no anti-thymocyte globulin in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing haemopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donors: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 17: 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosiñol L, Jiménez R, Rovira M, Martínez C, Fernández-Avilés F, Marín P et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in multiple myeloma: long-term results from a single institution. Bone Marrow Transplant 2015; 50: 658–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kröger N, Solano C, Wolschke C, Bandini G, Patriarca F, Pini M et al. Antilymphocyte globulin for prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruno B, Rotta M, Patriarca F, Mordini N, Allione B, Carnevale-Schianca F et al. A comparison of allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1110–1120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, Hulin C, Bourhis JH, Yakoub-Agha I et al. Prospective comparison of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by dose-reduced allograft (IFM99-03 Trial) with tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (IFM99-04 Trial) in high-risk de novo nultiple myeloma. Blood 2006; 107: 3474–3480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Minnema MC, van Dorp S, van de Donk NWCJ, Schouten F, Kersten MJ, Coenen JLLM et al. Prognostic factors and outcome in relapsed multiple myeloma after nonmyeloablative allo-SCT: a single center experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 244–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kröger N, Shimoni A, Schilling G, Schwerdtfeger R, Bornhäuser M, Nagler et al. Unrelated stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning for patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after autologous transplantation. Br J Haematol 2010; 148: 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Badros A, Barlogie B, Siegel E, Cottler-Fox M, Zangari M, Fassas A et al. Improved outcome of allogeneic transplantation in high-risk multiple myeloma patients after nonmyeloablative conditioning. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1295–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rotta M, Storer BE, Sahebi F, Shizuru JA, Bruno B, Lange T et al. Long-term outcome of patients with multiple myeloma after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation and nonmyeloablative allografting. Blood 2009; 113: 3383–3391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosiñol L, Pérez-Simón JA, Sureda A, de la Rubia J, de Arriba F, Lahuerta JJ et al. A prospective PETHEMA study of tandem autologous transplantation versus autograft followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2008; 112: 3591–3593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Giaccone L, Storer B, Patriarca F, Rotta M, Sorasio R, Allione B et al. Long-term follow-up of a comparison of nonmyeloablative allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma. Blood 2011; 117: 6721–6727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gahrton G, Iacobelli S, Bjorkstrand B, Hegenbart U, Gruber A, Greinix H et al. Autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation vs autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: long-term results of the EBMT-NMAM2000 study. Blood 2013; 121: 5055–5063.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, Irwin D, Stadtmauer EA, Facon T et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2487–2498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dimopoulos M, Spencer A, Attal M, Prince HM, Harousseau J-L, Dmoszynska A et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2123–2132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Madan S, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Buadi F, Hayman SR et al. Efficacy of retreatment with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in patients receiving IMiDs for initial therapy of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2011; 118: 1763–1765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McDaniel JM, Pinilla-Ibarz J, Epling-Burnette PK . Molecular action of lenalidomide in lymphocytes and hematologic malignancies. Adv Hematol 2012; 2012: 513702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gorgun G, Samur MK, Cowens KB, Paula S, Bianchi G, Anderson JE et al. Lenalidomide enhances immune checkpoint blockade-induced immune response in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21: 4607–4618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kneppers E, van der Holt B, Kersten M-J, Zweegman S, Meijer E, Huls G et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma is not feasible: results of the HOVON 76 trial. Blood 2011; 118: 2413–2419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alsina M, Becker PS, Zhong X, Adams A, Hari P, Rowley S et al. Lenalidomide maintenance for high-risk multiple myeloma after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 1183–1189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kröger N, Zabelina T, Klyuchnikov E, Kropff M, Pflüger K-H, Burchert A et al. Toxicity-reduced, myeloablative allograft followed by lenalidomide maintenance as salvage therapy for refractory/relapsed myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Weisel K, Dimopoulos M, Song KW, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Belch A et al. Pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone improves health-related quality of life and prolongs time to worsening in relapsed/refractory patients with multiple myeloma enrolled in the MM-003 randomized phase III trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2015; 15: 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sehgal K, Das R, Zhang L, Verma R, Deng Y, Kocoglu M et al. Clinical and pharmacodynamic analysis of pomalidomide dosing strategies in myeloma: impact of immune activation and cereblon targets. Blood 2015; 125: 4042–4051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Giralt S, Garderet L, Durie B, Cook G, Gahrton G, Bruno B et al. American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, and International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Conference on Salvage Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Biology Blood Marrow Transplant 2015; 21: 2039–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge all patients and their families. Daniela Majerna and Anna Maria De Filippo helped in revising the manuscript. The study was supported by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) and Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie-Linfomi e Mieloma ONLUS (AIL).

Author contributions

Conception and design: PC, VM and AM; collection and assembly of data: AM, FR, MC, CdP, MP and FM; data analysis: AM and VM; interpretation: VM, AM and PC; manuscript writing: first draft prepared by VM and AM. All authors helped revising the manuscript. Final approval of manuscript was done by all authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Mussetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Bone Marrow Transplantation website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montefusco, V., Mussetti, A., Rezzonico, F. et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and subsequent treatments as a comprehensive strategy for long-term survival of multiple myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 52, 1602–1608 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2017.183

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2017.183

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links