Sir,
Recently, Wang et al (2016a) published a paper the conclusion of which was that statin treatment protects against cancer. In their response (Wang et al, 2017) to Mascitelli’s and Goldstein’s comment to their paper (Mascitelli and Goldstein, 2017), Wang et al refer to several large cohort studies, which apparently are in support of their own study. However, in all of these studies, including the one by Wang et al’s own paper, statin-treated patients have been compared with non-treated individuals. As mentioned by Mascitelli and Goldstein, this method is associated with a serious bias because many untreated individuals have lived most of their life with low cholesterol, and there is even more evidence that low cholesterol predisposes to cancer than mentioned by Mascitelli and Goldstein.
For instance, Newman and Hulley found that in almost all experiments on rodents both fibrates and statins produced cancer (Newman and Hulley, 1996), and at least nine cohort studies have found that cancer was inversely associated with cholesterol levels measured in healthy people from 10 to more than 30 years earlier (Ravnskov et al, 2012). Several cohort and case-control studies have also shown that cancer patients have used statin drugs significantly more often than control individuals of the same age and sex (Ravnskov et al, 2012). The reason may be that LDL inactivates most types of microorganisms and their toxic products (Ravnskov and McCully, 2009;2012), and viral infections are the cause of almost 20% of all cancer types (Parkin, 2006).
Furthermore, cancer was seen significantly more often in the treatment groups in several statin trials, not only in PROSPER (Shepherd et al, 2002), but also in CARE (Sacks et al, 1996) and SEAS (Rossebø et al, 2008). In 4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group, 1994) and HPS (Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group, 2002) non-melanoma skin cancer was observed more often in the treatment groups and with statistical significance if the results in the two trials are calculated together.
Furthermore, Wang et al. have not adjusted their result for prior treatment with clofibrate, although cancer was an adverse effect in WHO’s clofibrate trial (Oliver 2010). Nor have they updated the participants’ medication continuously, which may induce another bias because a substantial number of statin-treated patients stop the treatment without informing their doctor (Jackevicius et al, 2002). It is noteworthy that in a nationwide study, mentioned by Wang et al, the lowest rate of cancer among the statin-treated patients was seen among those on the lowest statin dose (Nielsen et al, 2012).
Wang et al suggest that statins may have cancer-protective effects, but, as mentioned by Mascitelli and Goldstein, some of their effects may also increase the risk of cancer. However, as seen from the decade-long observation studies of the healthy people mentioned above (Ravnskov et al, 2012), the increased risk of cancer is not associated with statin treatment, but with low cholesterol. A more likely explanation is therefore that many of those without statin treatment have lived most of their life with low cholesterol and thus have had a higher risk of cancer compared with the statin-treated patients, most of whom have lived most of their life with high cholesterol.
Very few statin trials have continued for more than 5 years, and it takes many more years before exposure to a cancer-promoting factor, in this case low cholesterol, may result in clinically detectable cancer. An exception is skin cancer, because it is easily detected at an early stage, which explains the finding by Wang et al in their 10.5 years follow-up of postmenopausal women (Wang et al, 2016b), where statin use at baseline was associated with an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (P<0.002).
The hypothesis that it is the low cholesterol and not the very statin treatment that increases the risk of cancer is supported by a Japanese study of 47 294 hypercholesterolaemic patients treated with 5–10 mg simvastatin per day (Mabuchi et al, 2002). Six years later the number of cancer deaths was more than three times higher in patients whose total cholesterol was <160 mg dl−1 at follow-up compared with those whose cholesterol was normal or high (P<0.001).
Change history
11 April 2017
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002) MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360 (9328): 7–22.
Oliver MF (2010) Cholesterol-lowering and cancer in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. QJM 103 (3): 202.
Jackevicius CA, Mamdani M, Tu JV (2002) Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 288 (4): 462–467.
Mabuchi H, Kita T, Matsuzaki M, Matsuzawa Y, Nakaya N, Oikawa S, Saito Y, Sasaki J, Shimamoto K, Itakura H J-LIT Study Group Japan Lipid Intervention Trial (2002) Large scale cohort study of the relationship between serum cholesterol concentration and coronary events with low-dose simvastatin therapy in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia. Circ J 66 (12): 1087–1095.
Mascitelli L, Goldstein MR (2017) Comment on ‘Statin use and all-cancer survival: prospective results from the Women's Health Initiative’. Br J Cancer 116 (3): e1.
Newman TB, Hulley SB (1996) Carcinogenicity of lipid-lowering drugs. JAMA 275 (1): 55–60.
Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE (2012) Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality. N Engl J Med 367 (19): 1792–1802.
Parkin DM (2006) The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 118 (12): 3030–3044.
Ravnskov U, McCully KS (2009) Vulnerable plaque formation from obstruction of vasa vasorum by homocysteinylated and oxidized lipoprotein aggregates complexed with microbial remnants and LDL autoantibodies. Ann Clin Lab Sci 39 (1): 3–16.
Ravnskov U, McCully KS (2012) Infections may be causal in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Am J Med Sci 344 (5): 391–394.
Ravnskov U, Rosch PJ, McCully KS (2012) The statin-low cholesterol-cancer conundrum. QJM 105 (4): 383–388.
Rossebø AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, Brudi P, Chambers JB, Egstrup K, Gerdts E, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Holme I, Kesäniemi YA, Malbecq W, Nienaber CA, Ray S, Skjaerpe T, Wachtell K, Willenheimer R, SEAS Investigators (2008) Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 359(13): 1343–1356.
Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, Brown L, Warnica JW, Arnold JM, Wun CC, Davis BR, Braunwald E (1996) The effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in women after myocardial infarction: the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial. N Engl J Med 335 (14): 1001–1009.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group (1994) Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 344 (8934): 1383–1389.
Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, Bollen EL, Buckley BM, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Gaw A, Hyland M, Jukema JW, Kamper AM, Macfarlane PW, Meinders AE, Norrie J, Packard CJ, Perry IJ, Stott DJ, Sweeney BJ, Twomey C, Westendorp RG PROSPER study group. PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (2002) Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360 (9346): 1623–1630.
Wang A, Stefanick ML, Kapphahn K, Hedlin H, Desai M, Manson JA, Strickler H, Martin L, Wactawski-Wende J, Simon M, Tang JY (2016a) Relation of statin use with non-melanoma skin cancer: prospective results from the Women's Health Initiative. Br J Cancer 114 (3): 314–320.
Wang A, Aragaki AK, Tang JY, Kurian AW, Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Simon M, Desai P, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Liu S, Kritchevsky S, Wakelee HA, Stefanick ML (2016b) Statin use and all-cancer survival: prospective results from the Women's Health Initiative. Br J Cancer 115 (1): 129–135.
Wang A, Aragaki AK, Tang JY, Kurian AW, Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Simon M, Desai P, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Liu S, Kritchevsky S, Wakelee HA, Stefanick ML (2017) Reply to Comment on 'Statin use and all-cancer survival: prospective results from the Women's Health Initiative'. Br J Cancer 116 (3): e2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Additional information
This work is published under the BJC's standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the license terms will change to a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ravnskov, U. Comment on ‘Statin use and all-cancer survival: prospective results from the Women’s Health Initiative’. Br J Cancer 116, e9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.41
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.41
This article is cited by
-
Pre-operative levels of angiopoietin protein-like 3 (ANGPTL3) in women diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary
Lipids in Health and Disease (2024)