Abstract
γ-Aminobutyrate (GAB), the biochemical form of (GABA) γ-aminobutyric acid, participates in shaping physiological processes, including the immune response. How GAB metabolism is controlled to mediate such functions remains elusive. Here we show that GAB is one of the most abundant metabolites in CD4+ T helper 17 (TH17) and induced T regulatory (iTreg) cells. GAB functions as a bioenergetic and signalling gatekeeper by reciprocally controlling pro-inflammatory TH17 cell and anti-inflammatory iTreg cell differentiation through distinct mechanisms. 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase (ABAT) funnels GAB into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle to maximize carbon allocation in promoting TH17 cell differentiation. By contrast, the absence of ABAT activity in iTreg cells enables GAB to be exported to the extracellular environment where it acts as an autocrine signalling metabolite that promotes iTreg cell differentiation. Accordingly, ablation of ABAT activity in T cells protects against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) progression. Conversely, ablation of GABAA receptor in T cells worsens EAE. Our results suggest that the cell-autonomous control of GAB on CD4+ T cells is bimodal and consists of the sequential action of two processes, ABAT-dependent mitochondrial anaplerosis and the receptor-dependent signalling response, both of which are required for T cell-mediated inflammation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Mounting a robust and effective adaptive immune response in vertebrates is metabolically costly and requires proper allocation of essential yet limited energy and carbon resources. Metabolism must be tightly controlled at the cellular level to coordinate rapid expansion followed by a fine-tuned differentiation process in T cells. Beyond acting as bioenergetic substrates and biosynthetic precursors, metabolites can directly control cellular signalling responses through influencing DNA, RNA and protein modifications, signalling receptors’ activities and the production of reactive oxygen species1,2,3,4,5. As such, metabolism is fundamental to fine-tuning carbon and nitrogen allocation and optimizing immune response, which is at the centre of many diseases. Previous studies have used systemic approaches to comprehensively characterize the transcriptome, the abundance of intracellular metabolites and the overall catabolic activities of T cells at the different stages during the T cell life cycle6,7. These studies have generated critical temporal snapshots of the metabolic landscapes, which help establish a conceptual foundation for understanding T cell metabolic reprogramming. However, most of these studies have centred mainly on intracellular metabolites and activities of the central carbon metabolism. The overall metabolic landscape of T cells can also be delineated by monitoring the metabolites consumed from and secreted into the growth medium. The extracellular metabolome represents the ultimate outcome of metabolic input, processing and output. Extracellular metabolome profiling (also called metabolic footprinting) has been applied as a standard technique to optimize microbial bioprocesses by analysing substrates consumed from and metabolites secreted into a microorganism’s culture medium8,9. Here, we took a similar approach (Fig. 1a) to compare the extracellular metabolome profiles of naive T (Tnai) cells and different subsets of effector T (Teff) cells, including T helper (TH0, TH1, TH17) cells and induced regulator T (iTreg) cells.
Results
GAB is an abundant metabolite produced by effector T cells
The control (blank) medium and the spent medium of different subsets of Teff cells (Extended Data Fig. 1a) were profiled on a semi-quantitative untargeted global metabolomics platform based on liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), with broad coverage of up to 1,000–2,500 compounds, including amino acids, energy metabolites, nucleotides and lipids. Using this approach, we have classified metabolites as having changes in production or consumption according to whether the fold change compared with control was positive or negative, respectively. Hierarchical clustering analysis, the pairwise comparison and the principal-component analysis revealed that T cell subsets were characterized by distinct extracellular metabolome profiles (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1b–g). Consistent with the role of central carbon metabolism in supporting cell growth, the hyper-proliferative Teff groups consumed more carbohydrates and produced more lactate than the Tnai group (Extended Data Fig. 1e). Additionally, the TH17 group was characterized by the highest production of polyamines (Fig. 1b), in line with the recent finding of a critical role for polyamine in determining TH17 differentiation10,11,12. Intriguingly, iTreg cells produced high levels of γ-aminobutyrate (GAB) and its derivatives (Fig. 1b). Next, we applied gas chromatography–MS (GC–MS)-based targeted metabolomics and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to validate and quantify intracellular and extracellular GAB production. We confirmed that iTreg cells produced much higher levels of GAB than TH17 cells (Fig. 1c–h). Unexpectedly, GAB was the most abundant intracellular metabolite and among the top three extracellular metabolites in iTreg cells (Fig. 1c,d). However, neither prolonged culture nor restimulation would significantly changed GAB excretion (Extended Data Fig. 1h,i). Following activation, thymus-derived Treg (tTreg) cells could also excrete a comparable amount of GAB to the medium as iTreg cells (Fig. 1i). Notably, the intracellular level of GAB was even higher than that of glutamate (Glu) in iTreg cells, which is one of the most abundant intracellular metabolites in various organisms13. GAB is produced by catabolizing glutamine (Gln) through the (GABA) γ-aminobutyric acid shunt and elicits GABAergic response through GABA receptors (GABA-Rs) in neurons. To better understand the molecular nature that determines GAB production and function in T cells, we examined the expression of a panel of GABA-related metabolic and receptor genes by qPCR (Fig. 1e,f). Consistent with the previous findings on the GABA-R expression profile in immune cells14. Teff cells expressed a selected group of GABA-R subunits. However, only iTreg and TH17 cells expressed high levels of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), the enzyme that catalyzes the decarboxylation of Glu to GAB. Unexpectedly, the TH17 group exhibits a higher level of GAD than the iTreg group and was the only group that expressed a high level of the GAB-catabolizing enzyme 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase (ABAT), indicating increased GAB catabolism in TH17 cells but not in iTreg cells (Fig. 1f). Collectively, these findings suggest that extracellular metabolome profiling is a robust approach to revealing T cell metabolic characteristics in vitro. Using this approach, we have found that GAB is an abundant metabolite produced by T cells.
T cells use both Gln and Arg to produce GAB
Given the higher expression of GAD and ABAT in TH17 cells relative to iTreg cells, we reasoned that both iTreg cells and TH17 cells could produce GAB. However, the fate of GAB depends on ABAT, that is, GAB is diverted into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in the presence of ABAT in TH17 cells instead of being exported into the extracellular compartment in the absence of ABAT as in iTreg cells. To test this idea, we cultured TH17 cells with or without the potent ABAT inhibitor vigabatrin (Vig)15,16, for 6 h and then measured the levels of a panel of metabolites. Inhibiting ABAT activity by Vig led to the accumulation of intracellular GAB and GAB release into the medium (Fig. 1k,j). Notably, inhibiting ABAT activity rendered GAB one of the most abundant metabolites in the medium and cell pellet (Fig. 1k,j). Moreover, we have validated that ABAT was expressed in TH17 cells but not in iTreg cells using immunoblot (IB) analysis and intracellular staining (Fig. 2a,b). Interestingly, inhibiting ABAT activity reduced Gln consumption without changing Glu levels significantly but increased GAB levels over 100-fold (Fig. 2c,d). The reciprocal changes in Gln consumption versus GAB production raise the possibility of a Gln-independent GAB production route in TH17 cells. Gln catabolism via the GABA shunt is the canonical GAB biosynthesis pathway17. Alternatively, GAB could be formed from putrescine (Put), a metabolite mainly derived from arginine (Arg) (Fig. 2d)18,19. Indeed, the metabolic genes involved in converting Arg into GAB were highly expressed in TH17 cells (Fig. 2e). To determine to what extent Gln and Arg contribute to GAB biosynthesis, we cultured TH17 cells with Vig in the presence or absence of Gln, Arg or both. Then, we collected spent medium to measure the levels of various metabolites. While removing Gln or Arg reduced GAB production, the removal of both completely blocked GAB production (Fig. 2f). Next, we supplied [13C6]Arg, [13C5]Gln, [13C6]glucose (Glc) or [13C4]Put as metabolic tracers in the culture medium and followed 13C incorporation into individual metabolites by GC–MS. The presence of the 13C4 isotopologue of GAB and the corresponding 13C4 or 3C5 isotopologues of upstream metabolites further confirmed that Gln and Arg are carbon donors of GAB (Fig. 2g). However, only the 13C2 isotopologue of GAB was detected in samples with [13C6]Glc, suggesting that Glc can support Glu (and GAB) synthesis through the TCA cycle (Fig. 2h). Finally, we showed that Put can be converted to GAB via a diamine oxidase (DAO)-dependent reaction as its inhibitor aminoguanidine (AG) completely blocked the production of [13C4]GAB from [13C4]Put (Fig. 2i). In addition to a general requirement of both amino acids for protein synthesis, we envisioned that Gln and Arg might also support TH17 function and survival through supporting GAB biosynthesis. To test this idea, we cultured TH17 cells in Gln/Arg-replete medium or suboptimal medium (with low levels of Gln/Arg) in the absence or presence of high levels of GAB. Supporting our hypothesis, reducing the amount of either amino acid led to defects in the maintenance of viability and interleukin (IL)-17+ populations. Notably, GAB supplementation could correct both defects (Fig. 2j,k). We, therefore, conclude that TH17 cells can use both Gln-derived and Arg-derived carbon to synthesize GAB and support cell viability and function.
ABAT confers GAB-dependent anaplerosis on TH17 cells
Next, we reasoned that the expression of ABAT may render TH17 cells capable of diverting GAB into the TCA cycle in a way that maximizes carbon allocation and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in mitochondria. To test this idea, we added [13C4]GABA as a metabolic tracer into the culture medium and followed 13C incorporation into intermediate metabolites of the TCA cycle in iTreg cells and TH17 cells with or without Vig treatment (Fig. 3a,b). In line with the expression of ABAT in TH17 cells but not in iTreg cells, TH17 cells exhibited much higher levels of the 13C4 isotopologue of succinate and its downstream metabolites in the TCA cycle than iTreg cells (Fig. 3a). Inhibiting ABAT activity by Vig completely abolished the 13C4 isotopologue of succinate and its downstream metabolites in TH17 cells, supporting the idea that GAB is diverted to the TCA cycle via an ABAT-dependent reaction (Fig. 3b). Next, we sought to determine the temporal change in respiration following a sequential supplementation of GABA, Vig, oligomycin or carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) into the TH17 cell culture medium. Indeed, GABA supplementation enhanced oxygen consumption in an ABAT-dependent manner, while ATPase inhibitor oligomycin suppressed and FCCP maximized oxygen consumption as expected (Fig. 3c). We and others have recently shown that Arg-dependent polyamine biosynthesis is required to support T cell proliferation and TH17 cell differentiation10,11,12. We reasoned that ABAT expression in TH17 cells might allow Arg-derived carbons to be diverted into the TCA cycle through Put and GAB. Supporting this idea, [13C6]Arg-derived and [13C4]Put-derived 13C were incorporated into the 13C4 isotopologue of succinate and its downstream metabolites in an ABAT-dependent manner in TH17 cells (Fig. 3d, e). Finally, we sought to determine whether Gln-derived carbons could enter the TCA cycle via ABAT. Gln is a major carbon donor known to drive the TCA cycle and OXPHOS via glutamine transaminase and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) in Teff cells20,21,22. We found that a sequential supplementation with Vig and the GDH inhibitor R162 (ref. 23) suppressed oxygen consumption additively (Fig. 3f). Similarly, combining Vig and R162 suppressed [13C5]Gln-derived 13C incorporation into the TCA cycle metabolites more profoundly than single-agent treatment (Fig. 3g). Collectively, we have identified GAB as a conditional anaplerotic substrate in T cells, and its catabolism via the TCA cycle depends on the expression of ABAT.
GAB metabolism controls proliferation and differentiation
To further delineate the role of ABAT in T cells, we generated a T cell-specific Abat-knockout strain (Abat cKO) by crossing the Abatfl strain with the Cd4-Cre strain. qPCR, IB and intracellular staining analyses validated the deletion of ABAT (Fig. 4a, b). ABAT deletion did not result in T cell development defects in the thymus, the spleen or lymph nodes (Extended Data Fig. 2a–f). In addition, ABAT deletion did not affect cell viability, the expression of cell surface activation markers, the cell cycle progression from G0/G1 to the S phase, RNA, DNA or protein contents, cell size, or viability 24 h after activation in vitro (Extended Data Fig. 3a–d). However, ABAT deletion moderately suppressed overall T cell proliferation after activation in vitro (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 3e). Remarkably, both genetic and pharmacological ablation of ABAT activity inhibited pro-inflammatory TH17 cell differentiation while enhancing anti-inflammatory iTreg cell differentiation in vitro (Fig. 4c). Supporting these findings, the RNA-seq analysis of wild-type (WT) and Abat cKO T cells activated under the TH0 condition revealed enriched gene signatures associated with inflammation and T cell differentiation (Fig. 4d–f). Notably, the ABAT inhibitor (Vig) did not potentiate the effect of genetic deletion in suppressing TH17 cell differentiation, suggesting that Vig is a specific inhibitor of ABAT (Extended Data Fig. 4a). Moreover, overexpressing ABAT (ABAT-OE) suppressed iTreg differentiation and could synergize with IL-6 to increase the percentage of IL-17+ cells under the iTreg-polarizing condition in vitro (Extended Data Fig. 4b). Next, we examined the effect of ABAT inhibition on TH1 and TH2 differentiation. Genetic and pharmacological ablation of ABAT activity inhibited TH1 cell differentiation without significantly changing TH2 cell differentiation significantly in vitro (Extended Data Fig. 4c, d). Finally, we asked whether TH1 cells could divert GAB into the TCA cycle as TH17 cells did. We applied [13C4]GABA as a metabolic tracer and followed 13C incorporation into intermediate metabolites of the TCA cycle in TH1 and TH17 cells. Only TH17 cells exhibited high levels of the 13C4 isotopologue of succinate and its downstream metabolites in the TCA cycle (Extended Data Fig. 4e). Notably, genetic and pharmacological ablation of ABAT activity completely abolished the 13C4 isotopologues of metabolites in TH17 cells (Extended Data Fig. 4e).
The expansion and balance between pro-inflammatory CD4+ Teff cells and anti-inflammatory CD4+ Treg cells determine the pathogenic development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model of multiple sclerosis (MS), which is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Consistent with the expression profile of ABAT in vitro, the IL-17+CD4+ T cell group expressed the highest level of ABAT among all the CD4+ T subsets with infiltration into the CNS in animals with EAE (Fig. 4g). Notably, the genetic deletion of Abat in T cells or the systemic delivery of Vig conferred significant protection against EAE pathogenic progression, associated with more infiltrated FoxP3+CD4+ T cells and fewer infiltrated inflammatory CD4+ T cells, reciprocally (Fig. 4h,i and Extended Data Fig. 5a,b). However, Vig treatment resulted in better protection against EAE and a broader impact on periphery CD4+ T cells in the periphery than T cell-specific deletion of Abat, indicating that the systemic inhibition of ABAT might affect inflammation through both T cell-intrinsic and T cell-extrinsic mechanisms (Fig. 4j,k, and Extended Data Fig. 5c,d). We also used a competitive antigen-specific, T cell receptor (TCR)-dependent proliferation assay (OT-II) and a competitive homeostatic proliferation assay to assess T cell proliferation and differentiation in vivo. Notably, the ratio between WT and Abat cKO CD4+ T cells, CFSE dilution patterns and the percentage of IL-17+CD4+ or interferon-γ (IFNγ+)CD4+ T cells in various tissues suggested that the loss of ABAT dampens T cell proliferation and TH1 and TH17 differentiation in vivo (Extended Data Fig. 6a–e). Collectively, our results indicate that ABAT status determines the fate of intracellular GAB and, hence, pro-inflammatory TH17 and anti-inflammatory iTreg cell differentiation in vitro and in vivo.
GAB regulates T cell differentiation through the GABAA receptor
In line with earlier studies14, we have found that Teff cells express various subunits of the GABAA receptor (GABAA-R) (Fig. 1f). Additionally, T cells can produce and secrete a large amount of GAB into the extracellular compartment, which may elicit a context-dependent autocrine signalling response to regulate T cell differentiation (Fig. 5a). Supporting this idea, a low level of GAB supplementation could reduce TH17 but enhance iTreg differentiation without significantly affecting T cell activation and proliferation in vitro (Fig. 5b,c and Extended Data Fig. 7a,b). Conversely, GABAA-R antagonists with distinct antagonistic mechanisms enhanced TH17 cell differentiation but reduced iTreg cell differentiation without affecting T cell activation and proliferation in vitro (Fig. 5c–e and Extended Data Fig. 7c,d). The β-subunit is a core component of GABAA-R, and the β3 subunit (encoded by Gabrb3) was highly expressed in all Teff subsets (Fig. 1f). We generated a T cell-specific Gabrb3-knockout strain (Gabrb3 cKO) by crossing the Gabrb3fl strain with the CD4-Cre strain. Gabrb3 deletion did not result in T cell development defects in the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes (Extended Data Fig. 8a–f). In addition, cell viability, the expression of cell surface activation markers and cell proliferation were comparable in both WT and Gabrb3 cKO T cells after activation in vitro (Extended Data Fig. 9a,b). However, genetic ablation of Gabrb3 promoted pro-inflammatory TH17 cell differentiation while reducing anti-inflammatory iTreg cell differentiation in vitro (Fig. 5c,f). Notably, GABA supplementation only affected WT but not Gabrb3 cKO T cell differentiation in vitro (Fig. 5c,f). Finally, the T cell-specific Gabrb3 deletion let to significantly deteriorated EAE pathogenic progression, associated with increased inflammatory CD4+ T cells and decreased FoxP3+CD4+ T cells in the CNS and periphery (Fig. 5g,h and Extended Data Fig. 9c,d).
GAB regulates T cells through a bimodal mechanism of action
Next, we sought to dissect the effect of ABAT-dependent mitochondrial anaplerosis and GABAA-R-mediated signalling on T cell differentiation and function (Extended Data Fig. 10a). We envisioned that the ABAT-dependent anaplerotic reaction might support TH17 differentiation by providing succinate to fuel mitochondrial OXPHOS (Fig. 6a). Indeed, inhibiting ABAT activity by Vig suppressed oxygen consumption, which was reversed by adding a cell-permeable succinate analogue NV118 (Fig. 6a,b)24. In line with the effect of NV118 on oxygen consumption, the NV118 supplementation could partially reverse the inhibition of TH17 differentiation resulting from genetic or pharmacological inhibition of ABAT (Fig. 6c,d). Next, we asked whether ABAT-dependent mitochondrial anaplerosis could impact transcription factors critical for TH17 lineage differentiation, such as RORγt and STATs25. To test this idea, we reduced the medium’s Gln concentration and added a high concentration of GAB (1 mM) with a GABAA-R antagonist. We reasoned that reducing Gln levels would force cells to use GAB as a mitochondrial fuel and adding the receptor antagonist would eliminate the effects of receptor signaling. Indeed, GAB supplementation significantly enhanced the levels of RORγt and phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) but reduced the levels of phosphorylated STAT5 (pSTAT5) (Extended Data Fig. 10b).
Next, we sought to determine whether modulating GABAA-R affects key signalling molecules involved in regulating TH17 and iTreg differentiation. We treated T cells with a low dose of GAB (10 μM) in the presence of a GABAA-R antagonist. We reasoned that the low dose of GAB could engage the receptor-mediated signalling response without significantly fuelling mitochondrial metabolism. We assessed the levels of phosphorylated STAT proteins and the phosphorylation of a canonical mTORC1 substrate (pS6) because mTORC1 is critical for determining TH17 and iTreg differentiation26,27. Treating TH17 and iTreg cells with a low dose of GAB suppressed pSTAT3 and mTORC1 substrate phosphorylation (pS6) but increased pSTAT5 (Extended Data Fig. 10c). Notably, the effects of GAB on these signalling molecules could be reversed by a GABAA-R antagonist (Extended Data Fig. 10c). We showed that iTreg cells can excrete GAB into the extracellular compartment (Extended Data Fig. 1g–i). Finally, we sought to determine whether GAB contributes to Treg-dependent immune suppression. We performed a competitive Treg suppression assay by co-culturing iTreg cells with WT and Gabrb3 cKO CD4+ T cells that carried different isogenic markers (Fig. 6e). Indeed, Gabrb3 cKO CD4+ T cells proliferated better than the WT group, indicating that genetic ablation of GABAA-R could partially alleviate iTreg-mediated suppression (Fig. 6e). Together, these results suggest that GAB is an abundant metabolite produced by T cells and exerts both bioenergetic control and receptor-mediated signalling control of T cell differentiation (Fig. 6f).
Discussion
The vertebrate immune and nervous systems are intimately connected with each other developmentally, anatomically and physiologically. Interaction between the two systems coordinates their sensory functions to ensure organismal homeostasis and survival28,29,30,31. Immune cells and neurons can communicate with each other through a group of shared ligand molecules and receptors, including the neurotransmitter GABA and its receptors14,32. Beyond mediating intersystem communication between the immune and nervous systems, growing evidence suggests that GABA can also act as a paracrine signalling molecule mediating intrasystem communication to regulate immune response33. One recent study has found that B cells can produce GABA and suppress anti-tumour immunity through paracrine modulation of intratumoural macrophages and CD8+ T cells34. Additionally, GABA in macrophages has been implicated as an intracellular metabolite with a pro-inflammatory function14. Here, we show that GAB (the biochemical form of GABA at physiological pH) is one of the most abundant metabolites in T cells and promotes inflammation through modulating T cell proliferation and differentiation. Depending on the status of its catabolizing enzyme ABAT, GAB can act as a conditional anaplerotic substrate to promote TH17 cell differentiation or an autocrine signalling metabolite to enhance iTreg cell differentiation. In addition to its role in mediating intercellular communications, GAB also serves as a metabolic and signalling gatekeeper to regulate inflammation in a T cell-autonomous manner.
Teff cells consume Gln and Arg at high rates35,36. Beyond a general requirement for protein synthesis, Gln and Arg support T cell proliferation and function through their catabolic products. Gln is a primary carbon source to sustain the TCA cycle, which generates energy through OXPHOS and allocates carbon to produce biosynthetic precursors to support T cell growth21,36,37. Similarly, Arg catabolism is coupled with the urea cycle to produce bioactive metabolites such as polyamines to support T cell proliferation and differentiation10,11,12. Our results show that both Arg catabolism (via Put) and Gln catabolism (via Glu) are coupled with GAB biosynthesis in TH17 cells, implicating GAB as a crucial metabolic node and a branch point in amino acid catabolism. GAB can be consumed through the TCA cycle to enhance bioenergetic and biosynthetic capacities or be secreted as an autocrine signalling metabolite depending on the status of ABAT. We have further revealed that Gln can replenish the TCA cycle intermediate metabolites through either Glu or GAB anaplerosis. Glu increases the levels of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), while GAB increases the levels of succinate. Therefore, it is conceivable that the carbon input from Glu or GAB may change the intracellular α-KG to succinate ratio reciprocally. Hence, the GABA shunt in T cells may impact the hypoxia signalling response and/or DNA/histone methylation patterns by modulating the enzymatic activities of the α-KG-dependent dioxygenase family37,38,39,40, and Glu and Put are highly abundant intracellular metabolites that can be secreted to the extracellular environment by TH17 cells (Fig. 1a)10,41. The GAB-catabolizing enzyme ABAT may provide a sensitive and precise regulation of the three interconnected and highly abundant metabolites: GAB, Glu and Put, permitting rapid metabolic and signalling responses to control inflammation.
The high and dynamic metabolic demands of T cells during inflammatory and autoimmune responses require fine-tuned regulation of central carbon and ancillary metabolic pathways. Hence, metabolic pathways have been therapeutically exploited to target inflammatory and autoimmune diseases42,43. Disruption of central carbon catabolism can affect many cellular processes and cell types. However, targeting ancillary metabolic pathways engaged in a small group of specialized immune cells under physio-pathological conditions may result in less toxicity but maximal clinical benefits6. Gene and protein expression profiling studies have suggested that human autoimmune diseases, including MS, type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, are associated with the dysregulation of GABA-related metabolic and signaling genes44,45,46,47. Interestingly, cortical GAB levels are lower in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis MS than in healthy controls48,49. In addition, one recent study based on genome-scale metabolic modelling and in silico simulations for drug response indicated that GAB metabolism and signalling pathway not only are involved in the disease process but also are potential drug targets in human autoimmune diseases50. Consistent with clinical profiling and in silico studies, pharmacological modulation of GAB metabolism and receptor-mediated signalling response could ameliorate pathological phenotypes in several preclinical models of autoimmune diseases51,52,53,54,55. Our results further elucidate a previously unrecognized aspect of the T cell-intrinsic effects conferred by GAB catabolism and receptor-mediated signalling. Collectively, GAB-modulating strategies via blockade of GAB catabolism, activation of receptor-mediated response, or both may present a promising therapy for treating inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.
Methods
Mice
C57BL/6 (WT), Flippase (B6.129S4Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(FLP1)Dym/RainJ), OT-II (B6.Cg-Tg(TcraTcrb)425Cbn/J), CD45.1+ (B6.SJL-PtprcaPepcb/BoyJ), Rag1−/− (B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J), IL17A-IRES-GFP-KI (C57BL/6-Il17atm1Bcgen/J), FoxP3GFP+ (C57BL/6-Tg(Foxp3-GFP)90Pkraj/J) and Gabrb3fl (B6;129-Gabrb3tm2.1Geh/J) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (JAX, Bar Harbor, ME). Mice with one targeted allele of Abat on the C57BL/6 background (Abattm1a(EUCOMM)Hmgu) were generated by the European Conditional Mouse Mutagenesis Program (EUCOMM)56. The mice were first crossed with a transgenic Flippase strain (B6.129S4Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(FLP1)Dym/RainJ) to remove the lacZ-reporter allele and then crossed with the Cd4-Cre strain to generate the T cell-specific Abat knockout strain (Abat cKO). OT-II mice were crossed with Cd4-Cre Abat cKO mice to generate the OT-II Cd4-Cre Abat cKO mice. OT-II mice were crossed with Thy1.1+ mice (B6.PL-Thy1a/CyJ) to generate the OT-II Thy1.1 mice. Gabrb3fl mice were crossed with the Cd4-Cre strain to generate T cell-specific Gabrb3-knockout strain (Gabrb3 cKO). For one independent experiment, we used male and female mice from the same strain that were both sex and age matched (6–12 weeks old), such as two males and two females for WT mice, as well as for KO mice. All mice were bred and kept in specific pathogen-free conditions at the Animal Center of the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. A low-fat diet was provided (Envigo 2920, the irradiated form of 2020X; https://insights.envigo.com/hubfs/resources/data-sheets/2020x-datasheet-0915.pdf). Animals were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by cervical dislocation under protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (IACUC; protocol number AR13-00055).
Murine T cell isolation and culture
Naive CD4+ T cells were enriched from mouse spleen and lymph nodes by negative selection using the MojoSort™ Mouse CD4+ Naive T Cell Isolation Kit (MojoSort, BioLegend) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For the activation assay, freshly isolated CD4+ T cells were either maintained in a culture medium with 5 ng/ml-1 IL-7 or activated with 5 ng/ml-1 IL-2 and plate-bound anti-mouse CD3 and anti-mouse CD28. The culture plates were precoated with 2 μg/ml-1 anti-mouse CD3 and 2 μg/ml-1 anti-mouse CD28 antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Naive tTreg cells were enriched from mouse spleen and lymph nodes by positive selection using the MojoSort™ Mouse CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Isolation Kit (MojoSort, BioLegend) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For the activation assay, freshly isolated CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells were either maintained in a culture medium with 5 ng/ml-1 IL-2 or activated with 5 ng/ml-1 IL-2 and anti-mouse CD3/CD28 beads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Unless indicated separately, the cells were seeded in the RPMI-1640 medium (Corning) supplemented with 10% FBS, or heat-inactivated dialysed FBS (DFBS), 2 mM l-glutamine, 1% sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 units/ml-1 penicillin, 100 μg/ml-1 streptomycin and 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
For CD4+ T cell differentiation, 48-well culture plates were precoated with 2 μg/ml-1 (iTreg differentiation), 5 μg/ml-1 (TH1/ TH2 differentiation) or 10 μg/ml-1 (TH17 differentiation) anti-mouse CD3 and anti-mouse CD28 antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Freshly isolated naive CD4+ T cells (0.5 × 106 cells per ml) were activated with plate-bound antibodies and with mouse IL-2 (3 ng/ml-1) and human TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml-1) for iTreg differentiation, with mouse IL-2 (10 ng/ml-1) and mouse IL-12 (20 ng/ml-1) for TH1 differentiation, with mouse IL-2 (2 ng/ml-1), mouse IL-4 (50 ng/ml-1) and anti-mouse IFN-γ (10 μg/ml-1) for TH2 differentiation, or with mouse IL-6 (50 ng/ml-1), human TGF-β1 (20 ng/ml-1), anti-mouse IL-2 (8 μg/ml-1), anti-mouse IL-4 (8 μg/ml-1), and anti-mouse IFN-γ (8 μg/ml-1) for TH17 differentiation. In some experiments, Vig (1 mM), GABA (0.1 μM~1 mM), NV118 (25 μM), GABAA-R antagonists including bicuculline (Bicl, 5 or 50 μM), picrotoxin (PicroT, 5 or 50 μM) and flumazenil (10 or 1 μM), R162 (20 μM), oligomycin (1.5 μM), FCCP (1 μM), or AG (0.2 mM) was added to cell culture medium. Additional information on cytokines, antibodies and chemicals is listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Flow cytometry
For analysing surface markers, cells were stained in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% (wt/vol) BSA and the appropriate antibodies from BioLegend. For analysing the intracellular cytokines IFN-γ and IL-17A, T cells were stimulated for 4 hrs with eBioscience™ Cell Stimulation Cocktail (eBioscience) before being stained with cell surface antibodies. Cells were then fixed and permeabilized using FoxP3 Fixation/Permeabilization solution according to the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience). Cell proliferation was assessed using CFSE staining according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Cell viability was evaluated by 7AAD staining according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioLegend). For analysing DNA/RNA content, cells were collected and stained for surface markers before being fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by a permeabilization step with FoxP3 permeabilization solution (eBioscience). Cells were stained with 7AAD for 5 min and then stained with pyronin-Y (4 μg/ml-1; PE) for 30 min before being analysed using flow cytometer with the PerCP channel for 7AAD (DNA) and PE channel for pyronin-Y (RNA). A protein synthesis assay kit (Item No.601100, Cayman) was used for analysing protein content. Briefly, cells were incubated with O-propargyl-puromycin (OPP) for 1 hr and then they were fixed and stained with 5 FAM-azide staining solutions before being analysed using a flow cytometer with the FITC channel. For analysing the cell cycle profile, cells were incubated with 10 μg/ml-1 BrdU for 1 hr, followed by cell surface staining, fixation and permeabilization based on the Phase-Flow Alexa Fluor 647 BrdU Kit (BioLegend). Flow cytometry data were acquired on Novocyte (ACEA Biosciences) and were analysed with FlowJo software (TreeStar). Additional information on flow cytometry antibodies is listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Treg cell suppression assay
For the iTreg suppression assay, naive CD4+ T cells isolated from CD45.1 mice using the naive CD4+ mouse T cell isolation kit (BioLegend) were differentiated for 3 d to generate iTreg cells. Naive CD4+ T cells isolated from CD45.2/Thy1.1 WT donor mice and CD45.2/Thy1.2 Gabrb3 cKO donor mice were mixed at a 1:1 ratio (as Tconv cells) and labelled with CFSE. Then, approximately 5 × 104 Tconv cells were mixed with iTreg cells (with indicated ratios) and cultured with 3 ng/ml-1 IL-2 and anti-mouse CD3/CD28 beads. Cells were collected 4 d later and processed to assess proliferation by flow cytometry analysis.
Retrovirus production and transduction
Phoenix Eco cells that were cultured in fresh DMEM media (Corning) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 0.5% penicillin-streptomycin were transfected with the control plasmid (pMIC, MSCV-IRES-mCherry) or pMIC-ABAT (Supplementary Table 3). Viral-Boost Reagent (ALSTEM) was added to the culture medium at a 1:600 dilution 6 h after transfection. Cell medium was collected at 48 h after transfection, centrifuged at 300g for 10 min, and then filtered through a 0.45-μm filter unit (GVS Filter Technology). Retrovirus Precipitation Solution (ALSTEM) was added to retrovirus-containing supernatant at 1:4 dilution and incubated overnight at 4 °C, followed by centrifugation at 1,500g for 30 min at 4 °C to concentrate the virus. Then, approximately 0.3 × 106 activated CD4+ T cells (1 d after activation) were resuspended in 1 ml of retroviral supernatant containing 8 µl/ml-1 Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) and cultured under iTreg differentiation for 4 d.
Adoptive cell transfer assays
For homeostatic proliferation in lymphopenic Rag−/− mice, naive CD4+ T cells isolated from donor mice using a naive CD4+ mouse T cell isolation kit (BioLegend) were labelled with CFSE. Approximately 1 × 107 cells (mix of WT and KO cells at a 1:1 ratio) in 150 μl of PBS were transferred via caudal venous injection into 6- to 8-week-old sex-matched host mice. Mice were killed between 4–7 d after cell transfer. Lymph nodes and spleen were collected and processed to assess cell ratio and proliferation by flow cytometry analysis.
For antigen-driven proliferation using OT-II mice, naive CD4+ T cells isolated from OT-II/CD45.2 TCR-transgenic donor mice using the naive CD4+ mouse T cell isolation kit (BioLegend) were labelled with CFSE. Approximately 1 × 107 cells (mix of WT and KO cells at a 1:1 ratio) in 150 μl of PBS were transferred via caudal venous injection into 6- to 8-week-old sex-matched CD45.1 host mice. Host mice were immunized subcutaneously in the hock area (50 μl each site) in both legs with 1 mg/ml-1 ovalbumin (OVA)323–339 peptide (InvivoGen) emulsified with complete Freund adjuvant (CFA; InvivoGen). The mice were then killed 8 d after immunization. Lymph nodes were collected and processed to assess cell ratio, proliferation and protein expression by flow cytometry analysis.
EAE
Mice were immunized subcutaneously with 100 μg of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35–55 peptide emulsified in CFA, which was made from IFA (Difco) plus Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Difco). Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 200 ng of pertussis toxin (PTX, List Biological Laboratories) on the day of immunization and 2 d later. In the experiments shown in Fig. 4j,k and Extended Data Fig. 5c,d, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with 250 mg/kg-1 of Vig in 100 μl PBS daily from day 3 after immunization throughout the end of the experiment. In the experiments shown in Fig. 5g,h and Extended Data Fig. 9c,d, the animals were injected with PTX only once on the day of immunization for a suboptimal EAE induction. All mice were observed daily for clinical signs and scored as described previously10. In some experiments, the mice were killed when the control mice reached the onset of symptoms. The CNS (brain and spinal cord), spleen and peripheral lymph nodes were collected and mashed to generate the single-cell suspension. The cell suspension was centrifuged on a 30%/70% Percoll gradient at 500g for 30 min to isolate mononuclear cells from the CNS, followed by cell surface and intracellular staining and flow cytometry analysis described above.
Stable isotope labelling experiments
[13C5]Gln, [13C6]Arg and [13C6]Glc labelling of TH17 cells
Naive CD4+ T cells isolated from WT mice were polarized for 72 h under TH17 culture conditions before being collected and reseeded at 2 × 106 cells per ml in a conditional medium (RPMI-1640) containing 4 mM [13C5]Gln, 1 mM [13C6]Arg or 10 mM [13C6]Glc. After 12 h of culture, around 1 × 107 cells for each sample were collected and washed three times with PBS before being snap-frozen.
[13C6]Arg labelling of TH17 cells
TH17 cells (as described above) were pretreated with vehicle or Vig (1 mM) for 1 h before being collected and reseeded at a density of 2 × 106 cells per ml in a conditional medium (RPMI-1640) containing 4 mM 1 mM [13C6]Arg with vehicle or Vig (1 mM). After 6 h of culture, around 1 × 107 cells for each sample were collected and washed three times with PBS before being snap-frozen.
[13C4]Put labelling of TH17 cells
TH17 cells (as described above) were pretreated with vehicle, Vig (1 mM), or AG (0.2 mM) for 1 h and then collected and reseeded at a density of 2 × 106 cells per ml in a conditional medium (RPMI-1640) containing 0.1 mM [13C4]Put and 10 µM Arg and with vehicle, Vig (1 mM), or AG (0.2 mM) treatment. After 6 h of culture, around 1 × 107 cells for each sample were collected and washed three times with PBS before being snap-frozen.
[13C4]GABA labelling of TH17, iTreg and TH1 cells
Naive CD4+ T cells isolated from WT mice were polarized for 72 h under TH17, iTreg or TH1 culture conditions before being collected and re-seeded at a density of 2 × 106 cells per ml in a conditional medium (RPMI-1640) containing 0.5 mM [13C4]GABA, 0.1 mM Gln and the GABAA-R antagonist bicuculline (5 µM). After 12 h of culture, around 1 × 107 cells for each sample were collected and washed three times with PBS before being snap-frozen.
[13C4]GABA labelling of TH17 cells with Vig
TH17 cells (as described above) generated from WT or Abat cKO mice were pretreated with vehicle or Vig (1 mM) for 1 h before being collected and reseeded at a density of 2 × 106 cells per ml in the conditional medium containing 0.5 mM [13C4]GABA, 0.1 mM Gln and the GABAA-R antagonist bicuculline (5 µM) and with vehicle or Vig (1 mM) treatment. After 12 h of culture, around 1 × 107 cells for each sample were collected and washed three times with PBS before being snap-frozen.
[13C5]Gln labelling of TH17 cells with multiple inhibitors
TH17 cells (as described above) were pretreated with vehicle, Vig (1 mM) or R162 (20 μM) for 1 h and then collected and reseeded at a density of 2 × 106 cells per ml in a conditional medium (RPMI-1640) containing 4 mM [13C5]Gln and with vehicle, Vig (1 mM), R162 (20 μM) or the combination of Vig and R162 treatment. After 6 h of culture, around 1 × 107 cells for each sample were collected and washed three times with PBS before being snap-frozen. Additional information on stable isotope labelling is listed in Supplementary Table 4.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry sample preparation and analysis
GC–MS was performed as previously described57, and cell pellets were resuspended in 0.45 ml of −20 °C methanol/water (1:1 v/v) containing 20 µM l-norvaline as internal standard. Further extraction was performed by adding 0.225 ml of chloroform followed by vortexing and centrifugation at 15,000g for 5 min at 4 °C. The upper aqueous phase was evaporated under vacuum using a Speedvac centrifugal evaporator. Separate tubes containing varying amounts of standards were evaporated. Dried samples and standards were dissolved in 30 μl of 20 mg/ml-1 isobutylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (TCI #I0387) in pyridine and incubated for 20 min at 80 °C. An equal volume of N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-N-methyltrifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA) (Soltec Ventures) was added and incubated for 60 min at 80 °C. After derivatization, samples and standards were analysed by GC–MS using an Rxi-5ms column (15 m × 0.25 internal diameter × 0.25 μm, Restek) installed in a Shimadzu QP-2010 Plus GC–MS instrument. GC–MS was programmed with an injection temperature of 250 °C, injection volume of 1.0 µl and a split ratio of 1/10. The GC oven temperature was initially 130 °C for 4 min, rising to 250 °C at 6 °C min-1 and to 280 °C at 60 °C min-1 with a final hold at this temperature for 2 min. GC flow rate, with helium as the carrier gas, was 50 cm s-1. GC–MS interface temperature was 300 °C, and the (electron impact) ion source temperature was 200 °C, with an ionization voltage of 70 eV. Fractional labelling from 13C-labelled substrates and mass isotopomer distributions were calculated as described previously57. Data from standards were used to construct standard curves in MetaQuant58, from which metabolite amounts in samples were calculated. Metabolite amounts were corrected for the recovery of the internal standard and for 13C labelling to yield total (labelled and unlabelled) quantities in nanomoles per sample and then adjusted by cell number.
Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry sample preparation and analysis
Naive CD4+ T cells were polarized under TH0, TH1, TH17 and iTreg culture conditions or cultured with IL-7 (Tnai condition) for 72 h. Then, the cells were collected, washed with PBS and reseeded at a density of 5 × 106 cells per ml in fresh medium. After 6 h of culture, the cell medium was collected and snap-frozen. Sample preparation and analysis were carried out as described previously at Metabolon59. In brief, sample preparation involved protein precipitation and removal with methanol, shaking and centrifugation. The resulting extracts were profiled on an accurate mass global metabolomics platform consisting of multiple arms differing by chromatography methods and MS ionization modes to achieve broad coverage of compounds differing by physiochemical properties such as mass, charge, chromatography separation and ionization behaviour. Metabolites were identified by automated comparison of the ion features in the experimental samples to a reference library of chemical standard entries that included retention time, molecular weight (m/z), preferred adducts and in-source fragments as well as associated MS spectra and were curated by visual inspection for quality control using a software developed at Metabolon.
Metabolite quantification
In some experiments, TH17 cells were suspended at a density of 5 × 106 cells per ml with medium containing vehicle or Vig (1 mM). After 6 h of culture, blank medium (without cells) and spent medium were collected. The levels of Gln and Glu were measured using the Bioanalyzer (YSI 2900). Following the manufacturer’s instructions, Arg and GAB quantities were determined by l-Arginine Assay Kit (BioVision) and GABA Research ELISA Kit (LDN). Consumption or production of each metabolite was determined by calculating the difference between blank and spent media.
OCR
Following the manufacturer’s instructions, the OCR was determined using the Seahorse XFe96 Analyzer (Agilent Technologies). Briefly, approximately 1 × 105 TH17 cells were suspended in a 50 µl assay medium (Seahorse XF RPMI Assay Medium, pH 7.4, Agilent Technologies) containing 10 mM Glc, 2 mM Glu and 1 mM pyruvate and were seeded in an XF96 Cell Culture Microplates (Seahorse, Agilent Technologies) precoated with poly(d-lysine) (50 µg ml-1; Millipore). The cells were centrifuged at 200g for 2 min on a zero-braking setting to immobilize the cells before they were supplied with an additional 130 µl of assay medium and kept in a non-CO2 incubator for 30 min. Data analysis was performed using the Seahorse Wave Software (Seahorse, Agilent Technologies). In some experiments, the GABAA-R antagonist bicuculline (5 µM) was added along with GABA to prevent the activation of GABAA-R. Various compounds were injected into each well sequentially to achieve the following final concentrations: 0.5 mM GABA, 1 mM Vig, 20 µM R162, 1.5 µM oligomycin, and 1 µM FCCP.
Western blot analysis, RNA extraction, qPCR, and RNA-seq and NMR analysis of medium
Details are provided in the Supplementary Information.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software; v 8.0.1). To determine the statistical significance, different tests including unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test and two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple-comparisons test were used as indicated in the figure legends. The number of experimental repeats is indicated in the figure legends. R software (v 4.2.1) was used for Metabolon and RNA-seq data analysis. P values that were considered significant are shown in the corresponding figures.
Reporting summary
Further information on the research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The RNA-seq datasets generated for this study can be found in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession GSE190818. The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and supplementary information files. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Dang, C. V., Reddy, E. P., Shokat, K. M. & Soucek, L. Drugging the ‘undruggable’ cancer targets. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 502–508 (2017).
Barnie, P. A., Lin, X., Liu, Y., Xu, H. & Su, Z. IL-17 producing innate lymphoid cells 3 (ILC3) but not Th17 cells might be the potential danger factor for preeclampsia and other pregnancy associated diseases. Int J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8, 11100–11107 (2015).
Stine, Z. E., Schug, Z. T., Salvino, J. M. & Dang, C. V. Targeting cancer metabolism in the era of precision oncology. Nat Rev Drug Discov. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00339-6 (2021).
Muir, A. et al. Environmental cystine drives glutamine anaplerosis and sensitizes cancer cells to glutaminase inhibition. eLife 6, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27713 (2017).
Sivanand, S. & Vander Heiden, M. G. Emerging roles for branched-chain amino acid metabolism in cancer. Cancer Cell 37, 147–156 (2020).
Puleston, D. J., Villa, M. & Pearce, E. L. Ancillary activity: beyond core metabolism in immune cells. Cell Metab. 26, 131–141 (2017).
O’Neill, L. A., Kishton, R. J. & Rathmell, J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 553–565 (2016).
Pinu, F. R. & Villas-Boas, S. G. Extracellular microbial metabolomics: the state of the art. Metabolites https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo7030043 (2017).
Beale, D. J. et al. Application of metabolomics to understanding biofilms in water distribution systems: a pilot study. Biofouling 29, 283–294 (2013).
Wu, R. et al. De novo synthesis and salvage pathway coordinately regulate polyamine homeostasis and determine T cell proliferation and function. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc4275 (2020).
Puleston, D. J. et al. Polyamine metabolism is a central determinant of helper T cell lineage fidelity. Cell 184, 4186–4202 (2021).
Wagner, A. et al. Metabolic modeling of single Th17 cells reveals regulators of autoimmunity. Cell 184, 4168–4185 (2021).
Milo, R. & Phillips, R. Cell Biology by the Numbers. (Garland Science, 2015).
Bhandage, A. K. & Barragan, A. GABAergic signaling by cells of the immune system: more the rule than the exception. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 78, 5667–5679 (2021).
Vigabatrin. Lancet 1, 532-533 (1989).
Lippert, B., Metcalf, B. W., Jung, M. J. & Casara, P. 4-Amino-hex-5-enoic acid, a selective catalytic inhibitor of 4-aminobutyric-acid aminotransferase in mammalian brain. Eur. J. Biochem 74, 441–445 (1977).
Brady, S. Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects (Elsevier, 2005).
Shelp, B. J. et al. Hypothesis/review: contribution of putrescine to 4-aminobutyrate (GABA) production in response to abiotic stress. Plant Sci. 193–194, 130–135 (2012).
Seiler, N. & Eichentopf, B. 4-Aminobutyrate in mammalian putrescine catabolism. Biochem. J. 152, 201–210 (1975).
Brunengraber, H. & Roe, C. R. Anaplerotic molecules: current and future. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 29, 327–331 (2006).
Lian, G. et al. Glutathione de novo synthesis but not recycling process coordinates with glutamine catabolism to control redox homeostasis and directs murine T cell differentiation. eLife 7, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36158 (2018).
Johnson, M. O. et al. Distinct regulation of Th17 and Th1 cell differentiation by glutaminase-dependent metabolism. Cell 175, 1780–1795 (2018).
Jin, L. et al. Glutamate dehydrogenase 1 signals through antioxidant glutathione peroxidase 1 to regulate redox homeostasis and tumor growth. Cancer Cell 27, 257–270 (2015).
Ehinger, J. K. et al. Cell-permeable succinate prodrugs bypass mitochondrial complex I deficiency. Nat. Commun. 7, 12317 (2016).
Zhou, L., Chong, M. M. & Littman, D. R. Plasticity of CD4+ T cell lineage differentiation. Immunity 30, 646–655 (2009).
Chi, H. Regulation and function of mTOR signalling in T cell fate decisions. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 325–338 (2012).
Powell, J. D. & Delgoffe, G. M. The mammalian target of rapamycin: linking T cell differentiation, function, and metabolism. Immunity 33, 301–311 (2010).
Jerne, N. K. Towards a network theory of the immune system. Ann. Immunol. 125C, 373–389 (1974).
Ader, R., Cohen, N. & Felten, D. Psychoneuroimmunology: interactions between the nervous system and the immune system. Lancet 345, 99–103 (1995).
Cohen, I. R. Tending Adam’s Garden: Evolving the Cognitive Immune Self (Elsevier, 2000).
Tauber, A. I. Immunity: The Evolution of an Idea (Oxford University Press, 2017).
Vedhara, K., Irwin, M. R. & Irwin, M. Human Psychoneuroimmunology (Oxford University Press on Demand, 2005).
Tannahill, G. M. et al. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature 496, 238–242 (2013).
Zhang, B. et al. B cell-derived GABA elicits IL-10+ macrophages to limit anti-tumour immunity. Nature 599, 471–476 (2021).
Geiger, R. et al. l-Arginine modulates T cell metabolism and enhances survival and anti-tumor activity. Cell 167, 829–842 e813 (2016).
Wang, R. et al. The transcription factor Myc controls metabolic reprogramming upon T lymphocyte activation. Immunity 35, 871–882 (2011).
Klysz, D. et al. Glutamine-dependent α-ketoglutarate production regulates the balance between T helper 1 cell and regulatory T cell generation. Sci. Signal. 8, ra97 (2015).
Palazon, A., Goldrath, A. W., Nizet, V. & Johnson, R. S. HIF transcription factors, inflammation, and immunity. Immunity 41, 518–528 (2014).
Raghuraman, S., Donkin, I., Versteyhe, S., Barres, R. & Simar, D. The emerging role of epigenetics in inflammation and immunometabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 27, 782–795 (2016).
Chen, X. et al. Succinate dehydrogenase/complex II is critical for metabolic and epigenetic regulation of T cell proliferation and inflammation. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabm8161 (2022).
Birkner, K. et al. β1-Integrin- and Kv1.3 channel-dependent signaling stimulates glutamate release from Th17 cells. J. Clin. Invest 130, 715–732 (2020).
Patel, C. H., Leone, R. D., Horton, M. R. & Powell, J. D. Targeting metabolism to regulate immune responses in autoimmunity and cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 669–688 (2019).
Wang, R. & Green, D. R. Metabolic reprogramming and metabolic dependency in T cells. Immunol. Rev. 249, 14–26 (2012).
Lock, C. et al. Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat. Med. 8, 500–508 (2002).
Han, M. H. et al. Proteomic analysis of active multiple sclerosis lesions reveals therapeutic targets. Nature 451, 1076–1081 (2008).
Maas, K. et al. Cutting edge: molecular portrait of human autoimmune disease. J. Immunol. 169, 5–9 (2002).
Jin, Z., Mendu, S. K. & Birnir, B. GABA is an effective immunomodulatory molecule. Amino Acids 45, 87–94 (2013).
Bhattacharyya, P. K., Phillips, M. D., Stone, L. A., Bermel, R. A. & Lowe, M. J. Sensorimotor cortex γ-aminobutyric acid concentration correlates with impaired performance in patients with MS. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 34, 1733–1739 (2013).
Cao, G. et al. Reduced GABA levels correlate with cognitive impairment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur. Radiol. 28, 1140–1148 (2018).
Puniya, B. L. et al. Integrative computational approach identifies drug targets in CD4+ T-cell-mediated immune disorders. NPJ Syst. Biol. Appl. 7, 4 (2021).
Tian, J., Yong, J., Dang, H. & Kaufman, D. L. Oral GABA treatment downregulates inflammatory responses in a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity 44, 465–470 (2011).
Soltani, N. et al. GABA exerts protective and regenerative effects on islet beta cells and reverses diabetes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11692–11697 (2011).
Bhat, R. et al. Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2580–2585 (2010).
Carmans, S. et al. Systemic treatment with the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid aggravates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by affecting proinflammatory immune responses. J. Neuroimmunol. 255, 45–53 (2013).
Tian, J., Dang, H., Wallner, M., Olsen, R. & Kaufman, D. L. Homotaurine, a safe blood-brain barrier permeable GABAA-R-specific agonist, ameliorates disease in mouse models of multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 8, 16555 (2018).
Skarnes, W. C. et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474, 337–342 (2011).
Ratnikov, B. et al. Glutamate and asparagine cataplerosis underlie glutamine addiction in melanoma. Oncotarget 6, 7379–7389 (2015).
Bunk, B. et al. MetaQuant: a tool for the automatic quantification of GC/MS-based metabolome data. Bioinformatics 22, 2962–2965 (2006).
Evans, A. M., DeHaven, C. D., Barrett, T., Mitchell, M. & Milgram, E. Integrated, nontargeted ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry platform for the identification and relative quantification of the small-molecule complement of biological systems. Anal. Chem. 81, 6656–6667 (2009).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by 1U01CA232488-01 from the National Institute of Health (Cancer Moonshot program), 2R01AI114581-06 and R01CA247941 from the National Institutes of Health, V2014-001 from the V-Foundation and 128436-RSG-15-180-01-LIB from the American Cancer Society (to R.W.) and by T32 Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award CA 269052 from the National Institutes of Health (to S.K.). The Sanford Burnham Prebys Cancer Metabolism Core was supported by the SBP NVI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA030199 (to D.A.S.). The Center for Environmental and Systems Biochemistry Core was supported in part by the Markey Cancer Center support grant P30CA177558 (to A.N.L.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.W. conceptualized the study, designed all experiments and directed the study. R.W. and S.K. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. S.K., P.L. and D.A.S. performed the experiments and analysed the data. S.K. performed in vitro cell-related experiments such as mouse cell isolation, cell culture, ELISA, flow cytometry, western blotting, qPCR, LC–MS Metabolon and GC–MS 13C tracer samples collection, and in vivo mouse experiments including inn the EAE and adoptive transfer models. P.L. performed the NMR medium analysis experiment. T.W. and D.A.S. performed sample preparation, the experiment and data analysis for the GC–MS 13C tracer experiment. L.L. performed the ABAT plasmid sequencing, generated all mouse strains and provided mice for all the experiments. M.C. performed the R analysis. T.W.-M.F., H.-J.J.W. and A.N.L. contributed with conceptual design, interpretation of the data and critical review of the manuscript. R.W. obtained the funding and provided supervision. S.K., D.A.S. and A.N.L. contributed with funding. All authors critically reviewed and discussed the results and contributed to and agreed to the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Metabolism thanks Qi-Jing Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Ashley Castellanos-Jankiewicz, in collaboration with the Nature Metabolism team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Distinctive extracellular metabolome profiles characterize T cell subsets.
a, Cytokine production of indicating T cell subsets was determined by flow cytometer. b, Principal component analysis (PCA) for the correlations among each subset. c, Pairwise comparison of the statistical analysis, the numbers reflect the correlation R values. d, Extracellular metabolites in indicated T cell subsets were profiled by LC-MS. The hierarchical clustering heatmap represents the value of the relative amount (see color scale). e-g, Extracellular metabolites associated with energy metabolism (e), nucleotide metabolism (f), and lipid metabolism (g) in indicated T cell subsets were profiled by LC-MS. The value for each metabolite represents the average of triplicates. The complete metabolomic profile is provided in Source Data file 5. Statistical analysis was performed by R Programming Language (b–g). h, i, As illustrated by the experimental scheme (left), GAB production of iTreg cells in indicated conditions was quantified by a GAB bioassay kit (n = 4 biologically independent samples).
Extended Data Fig. 2 ABAT is dispensable for normal T cell development after the double-positive stage.
a–f, Distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell (a, d), indicated intracellular proteins (b, e) and surface markers (c, f) were determined by flow cytometer. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 3 biologically independent samples, significance was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. ns, no significant differences.
Extended Data Fig. 3 ABAT is dispensable for T cell activation.
a, Cell viability, size and activation markers (a), cell cycle profile (b), DNA/RNA contents (c), protein synthesis activity (d), and CFSE dilution and cell viability (e) were determined by flow cytometry. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 3 biologically independent samples, significance was calculated by Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significant differences. OPP: o-propargyl-puromycin, MFI: median fluorescence intensity.
Extended Data Fig. 4 ABAT regulates T cell differentiation in vitro.
a–d, Expression of indicated cytokines in indicated groups was determined by flow cytometry: a, c, d, data represents of n = 3 biologically independent samples, significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significant differences. b, data represents of n = 4 biologically independent samples, unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. ns, no significant differences. e, Diagram of converting [13C4]-GABA (left) to downstream metabolites. Indicated metabolites were quantified by GC-MS (n = 3 biologically independent samples). Black dot: 12C; Blue dot: 13C derived from the indicated tracers. Numbers in the X-axis represent those of 13C atoms in given metabolites. Significance was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. ABAT-OE: ABAT overexpression, α-KG: α-Ketoglutarate, M: mass spectrum.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of ABAT reduces T cell inflammation in EAE.
a–d, T cells were isolated from indicated sites in experimental animals described in Fig. 4h (a, b) and Fig. 4j (c, d). The expression of indicated proteins was determined by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis (n = 3 biologically independent samples) was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, ns, no significant differences. Vig: vigabatrin, EAE: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, CNS: central nervous system, LNs: lymph nodes.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Inhibition of ABAT suppresses T cell proliferation and differentiation in vivo.
a–c, As illustrated by the experimental diagram of competitive antigen (OVA)-specific proliferation (a, top), the donor cell ratio (a, bottom and b), CFSE dilution (a, bottom), and indicated protein levels (a, bottom and c), were determined by flow cytometry (n = 3 biologically independent samples). b, c, Data are shown as mean ± SEM, significance was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. ns, no significant differences. d–e, As illustrated by the experimental diagram of competitive homeostatic proliferation (d, top). The donor cell ratio (d, bottom, and e) and CFSE dilution (d, bottom) were determined by flow cytometry (n = 3 biologically independent samples). e, Significance was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. CSA: cervical, submandibular and axilla.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Modulating GABA receptor-mediated response does not affect activation and proliferation significantly during TH17 and iTreg differentiation.
a–d, Cell activation markers (a, c), and CFSE dilution (b, d) were determined by flow cytometry (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). Bicl: bicuculline, PicroT: picrotoxin, Flu: flumazenil.
Extended Data Fig. 8 GABA receptor is dispensable for normal T cell development after the double-positive stage.
a–f, Distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell (a, d), indicated intracellular proteins (b, e), and surface markers (c, f) were determined by flow cytometer. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 3 biologically independent samples, significance was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. ns, no significant differences.
Extended Data Fig. 9 GABA receptor is required for T cell differentiation but not activation.
a, b, Cell viability, cell activation markers (a), and CFSE dilution (b) were determined by flow cytometry (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). c, T cells were isolated from indicated sites in experimental animals described in Fig. 5g. The expression of indicated proteins was determined by flow cytometry. d, Statistical analysis (n = 3 biologically independent samples) was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, ns, no significant differences. EAE: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, CNS: central nervous system, LNs: lymph nodes.
Extended Data Fig. 10 GAB controls T cell signaling pathways through both receptor and mitochondrial metabolism.
a, Schematic diagram of GAB metabolism and GABAA-R-mediated signaling response. b, c, The schematic diagram of the experiment (top), the expression of indicated proteins from each group was determined by flow cytometry (n = 3 biologically independent samples). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. b, Significance was calculated by unpaired Two-tail Student’s t-test. c, Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significant differences.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1–5 and Supplementary Figures 1–2.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Metabolomic data for amino acid meta of Fig. 1b. GC–MS-based heatmap data for cell medium of Fig. 1c. GC–MS-based heatmap data for cell pellet of Fig. 1c. qPCR data of Fig. 1f. GC–MS-based heatmap data for cell medium of Fig. 1k. GC–MS-based heatmap data for cell pellet of Fig. 1k
Source Data Fig. 2
Unprocessed Western blots for Fig. 2a.
Source Data Fig. 2
qPCR data for Fig. 2e.
Source Data Fig. 4
Unprocessed Western blots for Fig. 4a.
Source Data Fig. 4
RNA-seq data for the heatmap for Fig. 4d. RNA-seq data IPA for Fig. 4f. RNA-seq data (all data) for Fig. 4d–f.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1
Metabolomic data (all metabolites) for Extended Data Fig. 1b–d. Metabolomic data (energy-meta) for Extended Data Fig. 1e. Metabolomic data (nucleotide-meta) for Extended Data Fig. 1f. Metabolomic data (lipid-meta) for Extended Data Fig. 1g.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, S., Liu, L., Wang, T. et al. GAB functions as a bioenergetic and signalling gatekeeper to control T cell inflammation. Nat Metab 4, 1322–1335 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-022-00638-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-022-00638-1
This article is cited by
-
The metabolic reprogramming of γ-aminobutyrate in oral squamous cell carcinoma
BMC Oral Health (2024)
-
Modulation of alveolar macrophage and mitochondrial fitness by medicinal plant-derived nanovesicles to mitigate acute lung injury and viral pneumonia
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2024)
-
Cellular metabolism regulates the differentiation and function of T-cell subsets
Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2024)
-
Elevated glutamate impedes anti-HIV-1 CD8 + T cell responses in HIV-1-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy
Communications Biology (2023)