Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Spatial analysis of tissue immunity and vascularity by light sheet fluorescence microscopy

Abstract

The pathogenesis of cancer and cardiovascular diseases is subjected to spatiotemporal regulation by the tissue microenvironment. Multiplex visualization of the microenvironmental components, including immune cells, vasculature and tissue hypoxia, provides critical information underlying the disease progression and therapy resistance, which is often limited by imaging depth and resolution in large-volume tissues. To this end, light sheet fluorescence microscopy, following tissue clarification and immunostaining, may generate three-dimensional high-resolution images at a whole-organ level. Here we provide a detailed description of light sheet fluorescence microscopy imaging analysis of immune cell composition, vascularization, tissue perfusion and hypoxia in mouse normal brains and hearts, as well as brain tumors. We describe a procedure for visualizing tissue vascularization, perfusion and hypoxia with a transgenic vascular labeling system. We provide the procedures for tissue collection, tissue semi-clearing and immunostaining. We further describe standard methods for analyzing tissue immunity and vascularity. We anticipate that this method will facilitate the spatial illustration of structure and function of the tissue microenvironmental components in cancer and cardiovascular diseases. The procedure requires 1–2 weeks and can be performed by users with expertise in general molecular biology.

Key points

  • The protocol covers tissue preparation, polymerization, tissue semi-clearing, immunostaining, refractive index matching and mounting, imaging, and data processing and analysis.

  • The mild processing of samples ensures structural and molecular stability, preserving most of the proteins of interest for antibody-based immunostaining.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the protocol.
Fig. 2: Tissue perfusion for sample preparation.
Fig. 3: Sample processing by hydrogel polymerization.
Fig. 4: Sample processing by tissue semi-clearing.
Fig. 5: RI matching and sample mounting.
Fig. 6: LSFM analysis for vascular structure and perfusion in hearts.
Fig. 7: LSFM analysis for tumor vascularization, perfusion and hypoxia.
Fig. 8: LSFM analysis for CAR T cell infiltration and immune composition in tumors.
Fig. 9: Imaging analysis for vascularity.
Fig. 10: Imaging analysis for tumor T cell immunity.
Fig. 11: Workflow for image processing and feature registration.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data discussed in this protocol are available in the supporting primary research papers7,8,11. The raw datasets of the main data and of the additional new data shown in this work are available for research purposes from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Anderson, N. M. & Simon, M. C. The tumor microenvironment. Curr. Biol. 30, R921–R925 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Binnewies, M. et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat. Med. 24, 541–550 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun, K., Li, Y. Y. & Jin, J. A double-edged sword of immuno-microenvironment in cardiac homeostasis and injury repair. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 79 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain, R. K. et al. Angiogenesis in brain tumours. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 610–622 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain, R. K. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 307, 58–62 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamplugh, Z. & Fan, Y. Vascular microenvironment, tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 12, 811485 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, D. et al. PHGDH-mediated endothelial metabolism drives glioblastoma resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy. Cell Metab. 35, 517–534 e518 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, W. et al. Targeting PAK4 to reprogram the vascular microenvironment and improve CAR-T immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Nat. Cancer 2, 83–97 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, X., Reboll, M. R., Korf-Klingebiel, M. & Wollert, K. C. Angiogenesis after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 117, 1257–1273 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harada, K. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor administration in chronic myocardial ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. 270, H1791–H1802 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, M. et al. Endothelial plasticity drives aberrant vascularization and impedes cardiac repair after myocardial infarction. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 1, 372–388 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ntziachristos, V. Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology. Nat. Methods 7, 603–614 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huisken, J., Swoger, J., Del Bene, F., Wittbrodt, J. & Stelzer, E. H. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305, 1007–1009 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Renier, N. et al. IDISCO: a simple, rapid method to immunolabel large tissue samples for volume imaging. Cell 159, 896–910 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cai, R. et al. Panoptic imaging of transparent mice reveals whole-body neuronal projections and skull–meninges connections. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 317–327 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi, Y. et al. FDISCO: advanced solvent-based clearing method for imaging whole organs. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau8355 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn, C. et al. High-resolution imaging of fluorescent whole mouse brains using stabilised organic media (sDISCO). J. Biophotonics https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201800368 (2019).

  18. Pan, C. et al. Shrinkage-mediated imaging of entire organs and organisms using uDISCO. Nat. Methods 13, 859–867 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tainaka, K. et al. Chemical landscape for tissue clearing based on hydrophilic reagents. Cell Rep. 24, 2196–2210.e2199 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tainaka, K., Kuno, A., Kubota, S. I., Murakami, T. & Ueda, H. R. Chemical principles in tissue clearing and staining protocols for whole-body cell profiling. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 32, 713–741 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tainaka, K. et al. Whole-body imaging with single-cell resolution by tissue decolorization. Cell 159, 911–924 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murakami, T. C. et al. A three-dimensional single-cell-resolution whole-brain atlas using CUBIC-X expansion microscopy and tissue clearing. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 625–637 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Susaki, E. A. et al. Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1709–1727 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hama, H. et al. ScaleS: an optical clearing palette for biological imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1518–1529 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hama, H. et al. Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1481–1488 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chung, K. et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332–337 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, B. et al. Single-cell phenotyping within transparent intact tissue through whole-body clearing. Cell 158, 945–958 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Richardson, D. S. et al. Tissue clearing. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00080-9 (2021).

  29. Richardson, D. S. & Lichtman, J. W. Clarifying tissue clearing. Cell 162, 246–257 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Y. et al. Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature 465, 483–486 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ranchoux, B. et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 131, 1006–1018 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang, M. et al. c-Met-mediated endothelial plasticity drives aberrant vascularization and chemoresistance in glioblastoma. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 1801–1814 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kisanuki, Y. Y. et al. Tie2–Cre transgenic mice: a new model for endothelial cell-lineage analysis in vivo. Dev. Biol. 230, 230–242 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Palma, M. et al. Tie2 identifies a hematopoietic lineage of proangiogenic monocytes required for tumor vessel formation and a mesenchymal population of pericyte progenitors. Cancer Cell 8, 211–226 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shaner, N. C. et al. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1567–1572 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cormack, B. P., Valdivia, R. H. & Falkow, S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173, 33–38 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Renier, N. et al. Mapping of brain activity by automated volume analysis of immediate early genes. Cell 165, 1789–1802 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Dodt, H. U. et al. Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain. Nat. Methods 4, 331–336 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hutchinson, M. H., Dorgan, J. R., Knauss, D. M. & Hait, S. B. Optical properties of polylactides. J. Polym. Environ. 14, 119–124 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Eliat, F. et al. Tissue clearing may alter emission and absorption properties of common fluorophores. Sci. Rep. 12, 5551 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants R01NS094533 (to Y.F.), R01NS106108 (to Y.F.), R01CA241501 (to J.F.D. and Y.F.) and R01HL155198 (to Y.G. and Y.F.), and by American Heart Association grants Innovative Project Award (to Y.F.), Transformational Project Award (to Y.G.) and Predoctoral Fellowship (to D.Z.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.Z. and Y.F. initiated the project. D.Z. performed most of the experiments and originally developed the protocol. D.Z., A.H.C., E.K., K.H., A.L.S. and J.F.D. designed the experiments. D.Z., C.Y. and W.Z. contributed to imaging analysis. Y.G. and Y.F. supervised the project. D.Z., E.K. and Y.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanqing Gong or Yi Fan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Hiroki Ueda and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Wang, Q. et al. Nat. Commun. 9, 559 (2018): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03050-0

Ma, W. et al. Nat. Cancer 2, 83–97 (2021): https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-020-00147-8

Huang, M. et al. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 1, 372–388 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1038/s44161-022-00047-3

Zhang, D. et al. Cell Metab. 35, 517–534 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2023.01.010

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 LSFM analysis of healthy mouse brain left hemisphere.

Healthy Cdh5-CreERT2;LSL-tdTomato mice were perfused with DyLight 649-lectin. Brain tissue was excised, followed by tissue clearing and LSFM imaging. Each minor tick on the grid represents 1 mm.

Extended Data Fig. 2 LSFM analysis of tissue samples after long-term storage.

a, GBM was induced in Cdh5-CreERT2;LSL-tdTomato mice, followed by perfused with hypoxyprobe. Tissue samples were subjected to tissue clearing, and stored in RIMS at 4°C for 2.5 years and imaged by LSFM. Each minor tick on the grid represents 1 mm. b, MI was induced in Cdh5-CreERT2;LSL-tdTomato mice, followed by perfused with lectin. Tissue samples were subjected to tissue clearing, and stored in RIMS at 4°C for 2.5 years and imaged by LSFM. Each minor tick on the grid represents 0.5 mm.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Key steps of image processing and analysis in Imaris.

a, Voxel size correction in “Image Properties” (Step 42). b, Crop out ROI in “Crop 3D” (Step 43). c, “Image Processing” module (Step 44). d, Setting deconvolution parameters in the “Image Processing” module (Step 44). e, Preprocessing the image using “Normalize Layers” and “Background Subtraction “ (Steps 45, 46). f, Creating objects for feature registration (Step 48). g, Initial parameters for creating surface objects (Step 48A(ii)). h, Thresholding of surface object creation (Step 48A(iii)). i, Filtering generated surface objects by size (Step 48A(iv)). j, Multiscale Points method of generating filament seed points (Step 48B(ii)). k, Seed point filtering by vessel diameter (Step 48B(ii)). l, Segment classification and filtering by machine learning-based model (Step 48B(iii)). m, Initial parameters for creating spot objects (Step 48C(i)). n, Spot detection by feature diameter (Step 48C(ii)). o, Filter Spot feature by quality and diameter/size (Step 48C(iii–iv)).

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Software 1

3D printing file for ETC sample holder.

Supplementary Software 2

3D printing file for sample imaging holder.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Cleveland, A.H., Krimitza, E. et al. Spatial analysis of tissue immunity and vascularity by light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Nat Protoc 19, 1053–1082 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00941-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00941-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing