Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An electric-field-responsive paramagnetic contrast agent enhances the visualization of epileptic foci in mouse models of drug-resistant epilepsy

Nature Biomedical Engineering volume 5, pages 278–289 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

For patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, excision of the epileptogenic zone is the most effective treatment approach. However, the surgery is less effective in the 15–30% of patients whose lesions are not distinct when visualized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Here, we show that an intravenously administered MRI contrast agent consisting of a paramagnetic polymer coating encapsulating a superparamagnetic cluster of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide crosses the blood–brain barrier and improves lesion visualization with high sensitivity and target-to-background ratio. In kainic-acid-induced mouse models of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, electric-field changes in the brain associated with seizures trigger breakdown of the contrast agent, restoring the T1-weighted magnetic resonance signal, which otherwise remains quenched due to the distance-dependent magnetic resonance tuning effect between the cluster and the coating. The electric-field-responsive contrast agent may increase the probability of detecting seizure foci in patients and facilitate the study of brain diseases associated with epilepsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Non-invasive visualization of the epileptic focus with an electrically responsive T1W-MR contrast agent.
Fig. 2: Development of EMs.
Fig. 3: Characterization of the EMs.
Fig. 4: Electrically triggered T1W-MR signal enhancement of EMs in vitro.
Fig. 5: EM visualizing the epileptic focus in acute seizure mouse models.
Fig. 6: EMs visualizing the epileptic focus in mouse models with spontaneous seizures.
Fig. 7: A positive correlation exists between abnormal EEG power and EM-associated T1W-MR signal enhancement.

Data availability

The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The raw and analysed datasets generated during the study are too large to be publicly shared, yet they are available for research purposes from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The availability of raw patient data is subject to approval from the Institutional Review Board of Huashan Hospital.

Code availability

The raw MATLAB codes are available in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Vattoth, S., Manzil, F. F. P., Singhal, A., Riley, K. O. & Bag, A. K. State of the art epilepsy imaging an update. Clin. Nucl. Med. 39, 511–526 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thurman, D. J. et al. Standards for epidemiologic studies and surveillance of epilepsy. Epilepsia 52, 2–26 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loscher, W., Klitgaard, H., Twyman, R. E. & Schmidt, D. New avenues for anti-epileptic drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 757–776 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwan, P. & Brodie, M. J. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 314–319 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwan, P., Schachter, S. C. & Brodie, M. J. Drug-resistant epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 919–926 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luders, H. O., Najm, I., Nair, D., Widdess-Walsh, P. & Bingman, W. The epileptogenic zone: general principles. Epileptic Disord. 8, S1–S9 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olson, L. D. & Perry, M. S. Localization of epileptic foci using multimodality neuroimaging. Int. J. Neural Syst. 23, 1230001 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, J. et al. Multimodal neuroimaging in presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin. 4, 35–44 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duncan, J. S., Winston, G. P., Koepp, M. J. & Ourselin, S. Brain imaging in the assessment for epilepsy surgery. Lancet Neurol. 15, 420–433 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Siegel, A. M. et al. Medically intractable, localization-related epilepsy with normal MRI: presurgical evaluation and surgical outcome in 43 patients. Epilepsia 42, 883–888 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Téllez-Zenteno, J. F., Ronquillo, L. H., Moien-Afshari, F. & Wiebe, S. Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 89, 310–318 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis, K. A. et al. Glutamate imaging (GluCEST) lateralizes epileptic foci in nonlesional temporal lobe epilepsy. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 309ra161 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao, X. et al. Guiding brain-tumor surgery via blood–brain-barrier-permeable gold nanoprobes with acid-triggered MRI/SERRS signals. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603917 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Catanzaro, V. et al. A R2p/R1p ratiometric procedure to assess matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity by magnetic resonance imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3926–3930 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moussaron, A. et al. Ultrasmall nanoplatforms as calcium-responsive contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Small 11, 4900–4909 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, Q. et al. H2O2-responsive liposomal nanoprobe for photoacoustic inflammation imaging and tumor theranostics via in vivo chromogenic assay. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5343–5348 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Angelovski, G. Heading toward macromolecular and nanosized bioresponsive MRI probes for successful functional imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2215–2224 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ying, X. et al. Angiopep-conjugated electro-responsive hydrogel nanoparticles: therapeutic potential for epilepsy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12436–12440 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan, Q. et al. Voltage-responsive vesicles based on orthogonal assembly of two homopolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 9268–9270 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin, T.-H. et al. T1 and T2 dual-mode MRI contrast agent for enhancing accuracy by engineered nanomaterials. ACS Nano 8, 3393–3401 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, N. et al. Iron oxide based nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and magnetoresponsive therapy. Chem. Rev. 115, 10637–10689 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Santra, S. et al. Gadolinium-encapsulating iron oxide nanoprobe as activatable NMR/MRI contrast agent. ACS Nano 6, 7281–7294 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi, J. S. et al. Distance-dependent magnetic resonance tuning as a versatile MRI sensing platform for biological targets. Nat. Mater. 16, 537–542 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Demeule, M. et al. Involvement of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein in the transcytosis of the brain delivery vector angiopep-2. J. Neurochem. 106, 1534–1544 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Feng, A., Yan, Q., Zhang, H., Peng, L. & Yuan, J. Electrochemical redox responsive polymeric micelles formed from amphiphilic supramolecular brushes. Chem. Commun. 50, 4740–4742 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gouder, N., Fritschy, J. M. & Boison, D. Seizure suppression by adenosine A1 receptor activation in a mouse model of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Epilepsia 44, 877–885 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo, Y. et al. In vivo mapping of temporospatial changes in glucose utilization in rat brain during epileptogenesis: an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-small animal positron emission tomography study. Neuroscience 162, 972–979 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. van Vliet, E. A., Dedeurwaerdere, S. & Cole, A. J. WONOEP appraisal: imaging biomarkers in epilepsy. Epilepsia 58, 315–330 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levesque, M. & Avoli, M. The kainic acid model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 2887–2899 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Riban, V. et al. Evolution of hippocampal epileptic activity during the development of hippocampal sclerosis in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroscience 112, 101–111 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Racine, R. J. Modification of seizure activity by electrical stimulation: II. Motor seizure. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 32, 281–294 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Balosso, S. et al. A novel non-transcriptional pathway mediates the proconvulsive effects of interleukin-1β. Brain 131, 3256–3265 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maroso, M. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 and high-mobility group box-1 are involved in ictogenesis and can be targeted to reduce seizures. Nat. Med. 16, 413–419 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Kuang, R. Liang, L. Zhan and X. Liu for experimental help. We thank X. Zhu for help with statistical analysis. We also thank L. Zhou, M. Gao and S. Jiang for useful discussions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81771895, 81971598, 81725009 and 81501120), the Shanghai Foundation for Development of Science and Technology (grant no. 19431900400), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (grant no. 2018SHZDZX01), the Fudan-SIMM Joint Research Fund (grant no. 20173001), the Asia 3 Foresight Program (grant no. 81761148029), the Shanghai Shuguang Program (grant no. 19SG06) and the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (grant no. 2017BR003).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Cong Wang, Wanbing Sun, Jun Zhang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Cong Wang, Qinghua Guo, Xingyu Zhou, Dandan Fan, Haoran Liu & Cong Li

  2. Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Wanbing Sun & Jianhong Wang

  3. Institute of Functional and Molecular Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Jun Zhang & Cong Li

  4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Jianping Zhang & Ming Qi

  5. State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Xihui Gao

  6. CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

    Haiyan Xu & Zhaobing Gao

  7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

    Mei Tian & Hong Zhang

  8. Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Zixuan Wei & Ying Mao

  9. Department of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Nicholas J. Long

Authors
  1. Cong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wanbing Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianping Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qinghua Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xingyu Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dandan Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Haoran Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ming Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xihui Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Haiyan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhaobing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mei Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jianhong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Zixuan Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Nicholas J. Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Ying Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Cong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.W., H.Z., M.T., Y.M. and C.L. conceived and designed the research. C.W., W.S., Jianping Zhang, Q.G., X.Z., H.L., M.Q., D.F., X.G., H.X. and J.W. performed the experiments. Z.W. and Y.M. provided clinical patient specimens. C.W., W.S., Jun Zhang, Z.G., J.W., Z.W. and C.L. analysed and interpreted the results. C.W., N.J.L. and C.L. wrote the manuscript. C.L. supervised the overall project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ying Mao or Cong Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods, figures, tables and references.

Reporting Summary

MATLAB code

Code for the processing of mouse magnetic-resonance images.

Supplementary Video 1

Monitoring of typical seizure behaviours in mice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Sun, W., Zhang, J. et al. An electric-field-responsive paramagnetic contrast agent enhances the visualization of epileptic foci in mouse models of drug-resistant epilepsy. Nat Biomed Eng 5, 278–289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00618-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00618-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing