Abstract
The rise of CO2 in atmosphere is considered as the major reason for global warming. Therefore, CO2 utilization has attracted more and more attention. Among those, using CO2 as C1-feedstock for the chemical industry provides a solution. Here we show a two-step cascade process to perform catalytic carbonylations of olefins, alkynes, and aryl halides utilizing CO2 and H2. For the first step, a novel heterogeneous copper 10Cu@SiO2-PHM catalyst exhibits high selectivity (≥98%) and decent conversion (27%) in generating CO from reducing CO2 with H2. The generated CO is directly utilized without further purification in industrially important carbonylation reactions: hydroformylation, alkoxycarbonylation, and aminocarbonylation. Notably, various aldehydes, (unsaturated) esters and amides are obtained in high yields and chemo-/regio-selectivities at low temperature under ambient pressure. Our approach is of interest for continuous syntheses in drug discovery and organic synthesis to produce building blocks on reasonable scale utilizing CO2.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The rise of anthropogenic carbon dioxide caused by fossil-based energy production is considered as the major reasons for global warming. Thus, finding solutions to reduce global CO2 emissions into the atmosphere is of crucial importance for coming generations1,2. On the other hand, CO2 provides the basis for the photosynthesis and represents an increasingly interesting C1-feedstock for the chemical industry. In this context, carbon dioxide, as the “waste carbon” from burning of fossil fuels, could be converted into “value carbon” in advanced chemicals3,4,5,6,7,8. However, the efficient chemical conversion of CO2 is still challenging due to its thermodynamic stability9. By using strong reductants such as silanes or metals this problem can be overcome; however, significant amounts of waste are formed10,11,12. In contrast, the reduction of CO2 with H2 in the presence of specific catalysts allows to synthesize formic acid, methanol and even methane with water as the only by-product13,14,15.
For industrial applications, the reduction of CO2 with H2 to selectively generate carbon monoxide via the reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reaction is interesting as CO is an important building block in organic chemistry and the chemical industry16,17. Representative examples are hydroformylations to aldehydes18, Monsanto as well as Cativa acetic acid syntheses19, Eastman-Kodak acetic anhydride process20, the synthesis of methyl methacrylate by Lucite alpha process21, and others22. In addition, more special carbonylation reactions (Pauson-Khand, carbonylative Heck, Suzuki, Negishi, Tsuji reactions, etc.)23,24,25 were invented in the past decades, which provide a toolbox for synthetic chemists to prepare structurally complex organic compounds including valuable agrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, and specialties. However, many synthetic organic chemists continue to be reluctant to perform carbonylations due to the toxicity and handling of CO. In fact, the use, storage, and transport of CO limits its utilization. For example, past efforts of Bayer AG in Germany to build a CO transport pipeline was not possible due to public protest and safety concerns (more information in CO transport pipeline problem of Bayer AG, see https://www.dw.com/en/bayer-subsidiary-holds-on-to-controversial-co-pipeline/a-38382768). Consequently, the development of alternative production of CO from less toxic compounds via in- or ex-situ continues to attract significant attention26,27. In this respect, the development of heterogeneous catalytic systems to promote RWGS reaction is interesting, too28. Apart from precious metals Rh, Pt, Pd, Au, also 3d-metals Ni, Cu, and Fe supported on oxides were reported in the CO2 hydrogenation to CO17,29,30,31. However, the high conversion of CO2 combined with selective formation of CO remains a major challenge. For instance, catalysts based on Pd/TiO2, Pd/ZnO, Pt/SiO2, or bimetallic catalysts such as PtCo/TiO2 displayed high CO selectivity over methane and methanol, but lower CO2 conversion was attained. Notably, Cu-based catalysts have been extensively studied, but most of them produced CO only in low to moderate selectivity and significant amounts of MeOH and/or methane are accompanied29.
To reach high selectivity towards CO, multicomponent catalysts are essential32. Apparently, the dispersion, surface morphology, and particle size of such materials have to be carefully controlled to improve both activity and CO selectivity17. The RWGS reaction is an endothermic process; therefore, high reaction temperature should facilitate the formation of CO. However, currently known Cu-based catalysts are not suitable for operating at high temperature because they are easily deactivated by sintering33.
In the past decade, the use of CO surrogates such as formates, aldehydes, metal carbonyls, COgen, and SilaCOgen has become increasingly popular, and many interesting applications have been achieved in organic synthesis26,34,35,36,37,38. Compared to all these works, CO generation from CO2 and its direct follow-up use in carbonylation reactions has been largely neglected. Indeed, only a few chemical and electrochemical CO2-to-CO conversion coupled with CO utilization for carbonylations were reported, until now. Chemically, Tominaga and Sasaki39,40, Eilbracht41, Xia and Ding42, Leitner43 and our group44,45 reported Ru3(CO)12, Rh(acac)(CO)2, and [RhCl(CO2)2] as classic homogeneous catalysts for CO production from the RWGS reactions in the presence of additives, and subsequent transformations in specific carbonylations in autoclaves. High pressures of CO2 and H2 in varying ratios and high temperatures are essential. Skrydstrup and co-workers reported the utilization of silacarboxylic acids (synthesized from chlorosilanes and CO2), or disilane compounds with CO2 to produce CO in homogeneous system. The generated CO was then applied in Pd-catalyzed carbonylation reactions by using the two-chamber system. Electrochemically, only one example was reported by Skrydstrup, Daasbjerg, and co-workers employing electrocatalyst iron porphyrin for CO2-to-CO conversion and incorporating produced CO into carbonylations also in two-chamber system. The major challenge in electrochemical transformation is to increase the CO generation rate28,46,47. Based on our long-standing interest in carbonylation reactions, herein we report a new heterogeneous copper catalyst enabling highly selective CO generation from CO2 in a continuous mode. The advantages of our catalytic system are no need of adding additives, long-term stability, easy recycle, and enough CO generation rate. Moreover, this reaction can be directly combined/switched with different industrially relevant and synthetically useful carbonylation reactions under ambient conditions. The described overall cascade process allows an efficient use of CO2/H2 as safe and green CO surrogate with follow-up utilization (Fig. 1). It is also one kind of mini-plants that initially explores the application of “two-chamber system” (Fig. S1).
Results and discussion
Selective CO generation from CO2/H2 (step I)
Inspired by previous efforts to develop catalysts for CO generation from CO217,48,49,50,51,52,53, selected novel Cu-based materials were prepared following precipitation hydrothermal (PHM) and conventional impregnation (CIM) methods (preparation details see SI 2.1). First, silica was selected as a support due to its inertness and role both as carrier and ligand54,55. Apart from that, copper nanoparticles on alumina and carbon were synthesized for comparison. All these materials were tested for the hydrogenation of CO2 to CO between 200 and 400 °C in a continuous flow reactor. As shown in Table 1, SiO2 supported Cu nanoparticles exhibited superior CO2 hydrogenation activity compared to Al2O3 and carbon black. Increasing the reaction temperature from 250 to 400 °C led to improved CO2 conversion, while excellent CO selectivity was preserved (SI, Fig. S4a). No significant MeOH formation is observed throughout the studied temperature range, which is contrast to the standard methanol catalyst system (Cu/Zn/Al2O3) and related materials. However, a small amount of CH4 (1–2%) was detected at the higher temperature. The conventionally prepared Cu@SiO2 (Table 1, entry 5) showed negligible activity as compared to the catalyst prepared using PHM. The effect of reaction pressure in the continuous-flow system at 400 °C has no influence on the overall CO2 conversion (SI, Fig. S4b).
Catalyst characterizations
To understand the activity and the structural features of the different Cu@SiO2 materials, detailed characterizations using ICP, BET, XRD, TPR, TEM, XPS, and CO-IR techniques were performed (SI, 2.2). The physiochemical properties including surface area, pore volume, and pore diameter were determined using BET analysis (SI, Table S1). All the samples had high specific surface area which decreased with increased metal loading (Table S1, entries 2–4) due to the blocking of the pores with metal particles. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of 10Cu@SiO2-PHM revealed only the presence of Cu2O species, while the conventionally prepared 10Cu@SiO2-CIM showed the co-existence of different oxidized Cu species (CuO, Cu2O). In addition, the hydrothermally prepared material exhibited smaller and well-dispersed Cu crystallites (SI, Fig. S2). For both materials also metal oxide reduction studies were carried out using hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) (SI, Fig. S3a–c). While the active catalyst sample displayed a single reduction peak for Cu species with uniform dispersion, the less active systems showed two peaks, which is in accordance with the phase composition determined by XRD. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the optimal 10Cu@SiO2-PHM material revealed the existence of copper nanoparticles in the range of 1 to 10 nm, partially agglomerated into bigger polycrystalline structures (Fig. 2a).
The Cu 2p3/2 spectrum (XPS analysis) of this sample is dominated by a broad peak between 933–934 eV and a weak satellite around 943 eV (Fig. 2b). The main peak was deconvoluted in two contributions centered at 932.5 and 933.8 eV. The binding energy (BE) values and the satellite, a typical feature for Cu(II), are ascribed to the presence of both Cu(I) and Cu(II) species56. Apparently, surface Cu(I) species are oxidized in air to some extent to Cu(II) species, which might be reduced again under reductive reaction conditions. Indeed, in case of a spent catalyst, the Cu 2p3/2 spectrum exhibited a main symmetric peak at 932.5 eV (Cu0/I) with only very weak satellite. However, in the 10Cu@SiO2-CIM sample the component of the main peak is shifted to higher BE (934.6 eV), and it can be ascribed to a stronger interaction of Cu(II) with the support in agreement to the H2-TPR analysis. In fact, the experimental amount of H2 consumption of an inactive 10Cu@SiO2-CIM sample was 1290.8 µmol/g (ICP = 8.3 is 1307 µmol/g), indicating that Cu2+ was almost completely reduced to Cu0 at 390 °C. However, the most active 10Cu@SiO2-PHM showed 627.97 µmol/g (ICP = 9.1 is equal to 1433.1 µmol/g) H2 consumption. This again proves the most active sample contains a mixture of Cu1+/Cu2+, while in the inactive sample we have only Cu2+ according to the H2 consumption. In addition, it should be noted that the active sample reduction profile starts at lower temperature in comparison with 10Cu@SiO2-CIM (SI, Fig. S3b, c).
Furthermore, in situ IR spectroscopic experiments were performed under reaction conditions (CO2/H2 at 400 °C) to monitor the progress of the reaction. As shown in Fig. 2c, a strong formation of CO is observed in the presence of 10Cu@SiO2-PHM, while a much lower amount of CO is detected using 10Cu@SiO2-CIM, clearly indicating the higher activity of the former catalyst. Notably, for both catalyst materials excellent selectivity is observed as no side-products are identified. To proof further the nature of Cu species by in situ IR spectroscopy, additional CO adsorption studies at room temperature were performed. A strong band around at 2131 cm−1 was detected for the 10Cu@SiO2-PHM sample, which can be assigned to νCuI-CO and/or νCu0-CO vibrations. In contrast, only a weak and broad band was detected in case of the 10Cu@SiO2-CIM sample. The different spectra again indicate a distinct higher concentration of Cu0/I species for the more active catalyst57.
Finally, catalyst stability studies were carried out for selective CO2 reduction to CO. As shown in Fig. 3, the optimal material showed no signs of deactivation after 100 h on-stream at 400 °C and 20 bar pressure (CO2/H2 = 1:3). The XPS analysis (Fig. 2b) of the spent catalyst indicate the presence of a dominant Cu+ phase with no diffraction peaks attributing to Cu2+ species, which is in accordance with the XRD analysis.
Direct follow-up utilization (step II)
After having a stable copper catalyst on silica for selective CO generation from CO2 in hand, we then were curious about its direct utilization in carbonylations16,58,59. Notably, the following carbonylation reactions worked smoothly without tedious gas isolation/purification (no need to remove CO2 and H2O). Utilizing the described equipment (see SI), the recycling of the generated CO is not possible at present. However, by adding an additional reactor or by installing a gas compressor it should be also possible to recycle CO.
Initially, the metal-catalyzed homogeneous hydroformylation reaction was tested as it not only represents one of the most important industrial processes, but also constitutes an attractive synthetic method for producing aroma compounds, which are used as ingredients in numerous perfumes and flavors60,61. Utilizing 1-octene 1a as the model substrate in this flow reaction mode we explored various catalytic systems and conditions. After the optimization (SI, Table S2), Rh(acac)(CO)2/6-DPPon was defined as the best catalyst. To our delight, hydroformylation proceeded smoothly even under ambient conditions and the linear product n-nonanal (pelargonaldehyde) 2a, which has a fatty-rose-like odor and confers a typical rose nuance into floral perfumes, was obtained in 92% yield (Fig. 4a).
The shorter chain n-heptanal 2b was synthesized in quantitative yield. The strong fruity odor makes it widely applied in the aroma industry, and due to its special scent in dilute solution or derived acetal, it is also an important ingredient in soap perfumes and domestic fragrances60. The longer chain olefin 1-dodecene 1c is often converted only in moderate yield and l/b selectivity in conventional hydroformylation reaction60. Its linear product n-tridecanal 2c has a slightly floral scent that is reminiscent of citrus and grapefruit peel. Gratifyingly, in this reaction system 2c was obtained in 90% yield with excellent selectivity (>99:1). The hydroxy aldehyde 2d is used as a main component in the production of a perfume with a smell like lily of the valley; however, industrially, it was synthesized in moderate yield from the hydroformylation of 3,7-dimethylocten-1-en-7-ol in benzene under high pressure (85 bar)60. In contrast, 2d is easily attained in 98% yield at room temperature and ambient conditions here. Silyl aldehydes are valuable synthetic intermediates62, which can be regarded as latent carbanions and therefore can be used as bifunctional reagents63. As an example, the silyl aldehyde 2e is isolated in quantitative yield. Furthermore, this mild and convenient method is also compatible for the hydroformylation of aromatic olefins (allyl benzene 1 f) as well as bio-renewable derivatives (eugenol64 1g). The corresponding aldehydes 2f and 2 g, which are applied in, cosmetic pharmaceutical and food industries65, were synthesized in good to excellent yields (79–>99%). Additionally, styrene (1h) and its derivatives (1i and 1j) were fully converted to the corresponding aldehydes (2h–j), which are isolated in excellent yields (94–99%) with the branched isomers as major products. However, using acrylates or acrylonitrile under the here reported mild conditions, no activity was observed. A list of the non-successful substrates can be found in the SI (Fig. S5).
Next, the methoxycarbonylation of alkynes was explored as another important method. Apart from many synthetic applications, acrylates resulting from propyne, arylacetylenes, and the parent compound are industrially important molecules as they serve as polymer precursors or fine chemicals66. For example, the global demand of methyl methacrylate (MMA) is over 4.8 million metric tons67. Thus, the methoxycarbonylation of propyne was developed by Shell in 198668 as an attractive one-step process to obtain MMA68. Applying specifically the combination of Pd(Oac)2/PPh2Py/MsOH as a state-of-the-art catalyst system, Drent et al. realized the synthesis of MMA with an impressive TOF of 40,000 h−1 at 45 °C under 60 bar of CO69. In this work, again the CO generated from CO2 reduction was directly introduced in the mixture of alkynes and Pd catalyst at ambient conditions, which makes the overall system easy to use. After a brief optimization using phenylacetylene 3a as the model substrate, the branched product 4a was obtained in quantitative yield with >99% branched selectivity in the presence of the Drent catalyst system (Fig. 4b). To our delight, other substituted aryl derivatives 3b as well as aliphatic substrates bearing chloro (3c) and cyano (3d) groups gave the corresponding acrylates 4b, 4c, and 4d in good to excellent yields (85–>99%).
Finally, the palladium-catalyzed aminocarbonylation of aryl halides was explored using CO directly from carbon dioxide and hydrogen. Such carbonylations represent a valuable tool in organic synthesis, and the resulting benzamides are important structures in many pharmaceuticals, dyes, agrochemicals, and other industrial products26,70. Indeed, 4-iodoanisole 5a and related arenes reacted smoothly with piperidine 6a by using [Pd(dba)2]/PPh3 as the catalyst. After directly introducing the gas mixture products 7a–c were isolated in 90–94% yield (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, linear secondary and primary amines were converted smoothly to the desired amides 7d and 7e were attained in good yields. Apart from the presented concept, this methodology is also noteworthy with respect to the selectivity because only monocarbonylated products could be observed, while related aminocarbonylations provided dicarbonylated products71,72. In addition, the high product yield at comparably low pressure is noteworthy.
Finally, it is worthwhile mentioning that the produced water from the RWGS reaction did not affect the investigated carbonylations here. Moreover, despite the mild conditions, all the presented carbonylation reactions proceeded with similar rates compared to related carbonylations with homogeneous catalysts61,69,73,74,75,76.
In conclusion, we present a practical concept for carbonylation reactions simply utilizing carbon dioxide and hydrogen as a safe source of carbon monoxide. Following our idea, CO is generated on demand and directly utilized in several carbonylation reactions. For the highly selective CO generating process, a novel hydrothermally prepared heterogeneous catalyst (Cu@SiO2-PHM), which constitutes of uniformly dispersed Cu(I) species, proved to be optimal. The generated carbon monoxide is used in industrially relevant hydroformylations, alkoxycarbonylations, and synthetically interesting aryl halide carbonylations to produce a variety of functionalized carbonyl compounds in good yields and selectivities. Notably, all these transformations can be performed in a general manner under mild conditions (ambient pressure, low temperature). Thus, this approach is of interest for continuous syntheses in drug discovery and organic synthesis to produce building blocks on reasonable scale, too. In general, the presented methodology offers a cost-effective and safe way to perform various carbonylation processes (hydroformylation, alkoxy- and aminocarbonylation) using CO2 instead of CO.
Methods
Materials and characterization methods
Air- and moisture-sensitive synthesis were performed under argon atmosphere in heating gun vacuum dried glassware. Chemicals were purchased from Aldrich, TCI, Alfa, Fluka, Acros, or Strem. Unless the purity was <97%, all commercial reagents were used without further purification. Cu(NO3)2•3H2O (≥99%) salt was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Aqueous NH3 solution (28–30%) was purchased from Roth Chemicals. Silica 60 M was obtained from Macherey-Nagel Germany. CO2 (99.99%), H2 (99.99%), Ar (99.99%) and N2 (99.95%) were provided by Linde Europe. All solvents were degassed prior to use. The products were characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 300 (300 MHz) or 400 (400 MHz) NMR spectrometers. Chemical shifts δ (ppm) are given relative to solvent: references for CDCl3 were 7.27 ppm (1H-NMR) and 77.00 ppm (13C-NMR). 13C-NMR spectra were acquired on a broad band decoupled mode. Multiplets were assigned as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), dd (doublet of doublet), and m (multiplet). GC analysis for the gas phase was performed using Agilent HP-PLOT/Q fitted with TCD (thermal conductivity detector) and FID (flame ionization detector) detectors. Carbonylation-related GC analysis was performed on a Trace 1310 chromatograph with a 29 m HP5 column. The products were measured by MS and GC analysis or by isolation from the reaction mixture by solvent evaporation and further purified by column chromatography on silica gel. BET surface area and pore volume of the prepared catalysts were measured from nitrogen adsorption isotherms measured at −196 °C (Micromeritics ASAP 2010). Before the measurement, each sample was degassed at 200 °C for 4 h. The average pore diameters were calculated from the desorption branch of the isotherm using the BJH method. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis was performed using Varian/Agilent 715-ES analyzer. XRD powder patterns were recorded on a Stoe STADI P diffractometer, equipped with a linear Position Sensitive Detector (PSD) using Cu K radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). Processing and assignment of the powder patterns was done using the software WinXpow (Stoe) and the Powder Diffraction File (PDF) database of the International Centre of Diffraction Data (ICDD). For the TPR experiments, the measurement was done using a Micromeritics Autochem II 2920 instrument. A 100 mg sample was loaded in U shaped quartz reactor and heated from RT to 400 °C with 20 K/min in 5% O2/He (50 ml/min) for 30 min at 400 °C, then flushing and cooling down to RT under the flow of Ar. The TPR measurement was carried out from RT to 700 °C (holding time 30 min) in a 5% H2/Ar flow (50 ml/min) with a heating rate of 10 K/min. Another TPR measurement was done as described previously only in the pretreatment step Ar was used rather than O2. The hydrogen consumption peaks were recorded with temperature using thermal conductivity detector. Quantitative analysis of the TPR data was calculated based on the peak areas. The TEM measurements were performed at 200 kV with an aberration-corrected JEMARM200F (JEOL, Corrector: CEOS). The microscope is equipped with a JED-2300 (JEOL) energy-dispersive X-ray-spectrometer (EDXS) and an Enfinum ER (GATAN) with Dual EELS for chemical analysis. The solid samples were deposed without any pretreatment on a holey carbon-supported Ni-grid (mesh 300) and transferred to the microscope. XPS data were obtained with a VG ESCALAB220iXL (ThermoScientific) with monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation. Binding energies were corrected to C–C contribution at 284.8 eV in C1s region. For quantitative analysis, the peaks were deconvoluted with Gaussian-Lorentzian curves, the peak area was divided by a sensitivity factor obtained from the element-specific Scofield factor and the transmission function of the spectrometer. For the characterization of the Cu species CO was used as probe molecule. In situ FTIR spectroscopic measurements in transmission mode were carried out on a Bruker Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a heatable and evacuable homemade reaction cell with CaF2 windows connected to a gas-dosing and evacuation system. The sample powders were pressed into self-supporting wafers with a diameter of 20 mm and a weight of 50 mg. The samples were pretreated by heating in vacuum up to 400 °C and keeping at this temperature for 1 h. After dosing CO2/H2 = 1:3 for 5 min the reaction cell was closed, and the reaction was monitored for 60 min. After cooling to room temperature and evacuation the sample was exposed to 5% CO/He. The CO adsorbate spectrum was recorded after removing the gas phase by evacuation of the cell.
Cu@supports-PHM catalysts preparation
The catalysts were prepared using precipitation-hydrothermal method (PHM). In a typical synthesis process, desired amount of metal precursor was dissolved in 20 mL of DI H2O to obtain different metal loadings and stirred for 15 min. 2.5 ml of 28–30% Aq. NH3 solution was added dropwise under continuous stirring for 30 min. Then the support (SiO2, Al2O3, or C) was added to the precipitate and the mixture was stirred vigorously for 4 h at room temperature. The contents were then transferred to a 100 mL autoclave and heated at 120 °C for 8 h without stirring. The autoclave was then allowed to cool naturally to room temperature and the slurry was centrifuged and washed several times with ethanol and dried at 80 °C for 10 h. The dried material was then pyrolysed at certain temperature for 2 h under Ar atmosphere.
Step I, selective CO generation from CO2/H2
The reaction for reducing CO2 with H2 into CO was carried out in a fixed bed flow-reactor (8.9 mm ID). The catalyst bed at the center of the reactor was supported by glass wool and quartz sand (dilution 1:5). Temperature was measured by a K-type thermocouple inserted into the catalyst bed. A gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (H2:CO2 = 3:1) at a total flow rate of 100 NmL/min was fed into the reactor (300 mg catalyst, 0.25–0.42 mm, GHSV = 15,000 h−1). The volumetric flow rate of the feed gases was controlled by pre-calibrated mass flow controllers (Brooks Instrument). The reaction temperature was increased from 200 to 400 °C. The CO2 conversion and product selectivity are defined as follows:
where mCO2(in) and mCO2(out) are the moles of CO2 in and out of the reactor. The selectivity is defined as the percentage of moles of CO2 consumed to form desired product (CO, CH4, or MeOH), in respect to the amount of CO2 consumed during the reaction.
Step II, direct follow-up utilization
Under argon atmosphere, a 25 mL three-necked round bottom flask was charged with certain catalyst. Ligand and additives, as well as a stirring bar. The flask was assembled with a −20 °C condenser and a pipeline which connect to the fixed bed flow-reactor. The water generated during the CO2 reduction (step I) was not removed and the resulting gas mixture (CO2, H2, CO) was constantly bubbled through the reaction solution at flow rate of 100 ml/min. Substrate and solvent were injected into the flask by syringe. The flask was then sealed with cap, the condenser was connected to the ventilation system and the flow-reactor was opened for bubbling in the solution. The GC analysis was performed while taking a gas sample directly from the reaction flask to get the gas composition (%). The reaction was performed for 20 h at 25 °C. After the reaction finished, the l/b selectivity was determined by GC analysis using isooctane as the internal standard. The yields were isolated yields after purification with the column chromatography.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article or its Supplementary Information data files.
References
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva (Switzerland). IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (2005).
Verband der Chemischen Industrie e. V. (VCI), Gesellschaft für Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e. V. (DECHEMA). Positonspapier: “Verwertung und Speicherung von CO2” (2009).
Artz, J. et al. Sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide: an integrated review of catalysis and life cycle assessment. Chem. Rev. 118, 434–504 (2018).
Klankermayer, J. & Leitner, W. Love at second sight for CO2 and H2 in organic synthesis. Science 350, 629–630 (2015).
Kleij, A. W., North, M. & Urakawa, A. CO2 catalysis. ChemSusChem 10, 1036–1038 (2017).
Grignard, B., Gennen, S., Jérôme, C., Kleij, A. W. & Detrembleur, C. Advances in the use of CO2 as a renewable feedstock for the synthesis of polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 4466–4514 (2019).
Ye, J.-H., Ju, T., Huang, H., Liao, L.-L. & Yu, D.-G. Radical carboxylative cyclizations and carboxylations with CO2. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 2518–2531 (2021).
Song, Q.-W., Zhou, Z.-H. & He, L.-N. Efficient, selective and sustainable catalysis of carbon dioxide. Green. Chem. 19, 3707–3728 (2017).
Liu, Q., Wu, L., Jackstell, R. & Beller, M. Using carbon dioxide as a building block in organic synthesis. Nat. Commun. 6, 5933–5948 (2015).
Zhang, Y., Zhang, T. & Das, S. Catalytic transformation of CO2 into C1 chemicals using hydrosilanes as a reducing agent. Green. Chem. 22, 1800–1820 (2020).
Stephan, D. W. Frustrated Lewis pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10018–10032 (2015).
Tortajada, A., Juliá‐Hernández, F., Börjesson, M., Moragas, T. & Martin, R. Transition‐metal‐catalyzed carboxylation reactions with carbon dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 15948–15982 (2018).
Porosoff, M. D., Yan, B. & Chen, J. G. Catalytic reduction of CO2 by H2 for synthesis of CO, methanol and hydrocarbons: challenges and opportunities. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 62–73 (2016).
Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X. & Gong, J. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3703–3727 (2011).
Wu, C. et al. Inverse ZrO2/Cu as a highly efficient methanol synthesis catalyst from CO2 hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5767–5776 (2020).
Beller, M. Catalytic Carbonylation Reactions (Springer, 2006).
Lin, L. et al. In situ characterization of Cu/CeO2 nanocatalysts for CO2 hydrogenation: morphological effects of nanostructured ceria on the catalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 122, 12934–12943 (2018).
Franke, R., Selent, D. & Börner, A. Applied hydroformylation. Chem. Rev. 112, 5675–5732 (2012).
Thomas, C. M. & Süss-Fink, G. Ligand effects in the rhodium-catalyzed carbonylation of methanol. Coord. Chem. Rev. 243, 125–142 (2003).
Zoeller, J. R. et al. Eastman chemical company acetic anhydride process. Catal. Today 13, 73–91 (1992).
Clegg, W. et al. Highly active and selective catalysts for the production of methyl propanoate via the methoxycarbonylation of ethene. Chem. Commun. 18, 1877–1878 (1999).
Drent, E. & Budzelaar, P. H. Palladium-catalyzed alternating copolymerization of alkenes and carbon monoxide. Chem. Rev. 96, 663–682 (1996).
Kathe, P. & Fleischer, I. Light expands a catalyst’s repertoire. Science 368, 242–243 (2020).
Liu, J., Han, Z., Wang, X., Wang, Z. & Ding, K. Highly regio-and enantioselective alkoxycarbonylative amination of terminal allenes catalyzed by a spiroketal-based diphosphine/Pd (II) complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 15346–15349 (2015).
Wu, X.-F., Neumann, H. & Beller, M. Palladium-catalyzed carbonylative coupling reactions between Ar–X and carbon nucleophiles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 4986–5009 (2011).
Friis, S. D., Lindhardt, A. T. & Skrydstrup, T. The development and application of two-chamber reactors and carbon monoxide precursors for safe carbonylation reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 594–605 (2016).
Zhang, X., Shen, C., Xia, C., Tian, X. & He, L. Alkoxycarbonylation of olefins with carbon dioxide by a reusable heterobimetallic ruthenium–cobalt catalytic system. Green. Chem. 20, 5533–5539 (2018).
Nielsen, D. U., Hu, X.-M., Daasbjerg, K. & Skrydstrup, T. Chemically and electrochemically catalysed conversion of CO2 to CO with follow-up utilization to value-added chemicals. Nat. Catal. 1, 244–254 (2018).
Kattel, S., Liu, P. & Chen, J. G. Tuning selectivity of CO2 hydrogenation reactions at the metal/oxide interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9739–9754 (2017).
Yin, Z. et al. Highly selective palladium-copper bimetallic electrocatalysts for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO. Nano Energy 27, 35–43 (2016).
Chang, K., Zhang, H., Cheng, M.-j & Lu, Q. Application of ceria in CO2 conversion catalysis. ACS Catal. 10, 613–631 (2019).
Pastor-Pérez, L. et al. CO2 valorisation via reverse water-gas shift reaction using advanced Cs doped Fe-Cu/Al2O3 catalysts. J. CO2 Util. 21, 423–428 (2017).
Chen, C.-S., Cheng, W.-H. & Lin, S.-S. Enhanced activity and stability of a Cu/SiO2 catalyst for the reverse water gas shift reaction by an iron promoter. Chem. Commun. 18, 1770–1771 (2001).
Gautam, P. & Bhanage, B. M. Recent advances in the transition metal catalyzed carbonylation of alkynes, arenes and aryl halides using CO surrogates. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 4663–4702 (2015).
Morimoto, T. & Kakiuchi, K. Evolution of carbonylation catalysis: no need for carbon monoxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5580–5588 (2004).
Abel, E. & Stone, F. The chemistry of transition-metal carbonyls: structural considerations. Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 23, 325–371 (1969).
Cao, J., Zheng, Z.-J., Xu, Z. & Xu, L.-W. Transition-metal-catalyzed transfer carbonylation with HCOOH or HCHO as non-gaseous C1 source. Coord. Chem. Rev. 336, 43–53 (2017).
Peng, J.-B., Qi, X. & Wu, X.-F. Recent achievements in carbonylation reactions: a personal account. Synlett 28, 175–194 (2017).
Tominaga, K.-i. & Sasaki, Y. Ruthenium-catalyzed one-pot hydroformylation of alkenes using carbon dioxide as a reactant. J. Mol. Catal. A 220, 159–165 (2004).
Tominaga, K.-i. & Sasaki, Y. Ruthenium complex-catalyzed hydroformylation of alkenes with carbon dioxide. Catal. Commun. 1, 1–3 (2000).
Srivastava, V. K. & Eilbracht, P. Ruthenium carbonyl-complex catalyzed hydroaminomethylation of olefins with carbon dioxide and amines. Catal. Commun. 10, 1791–1795 (2009).
Ren, X. et al. Rhodium‐complex‐catalyzed hydroformylation of olefins with CO2 and hydrosilane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 310–313 (2017).
Ostapowicz, T. G., Schmitz, M., Krystof, M., Klankermayer, J. & Leitner, W. Carbon dioxide as a C1 building block for the formation of carboxylic acids by formal catalytic hydrocarboxylation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 125, 12119–12123 (2013).
Fleischer, I. et al. Towards the development of a selective ruthenium‐catalyzed hydroformylation of olefins. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 10589–10594 (2013).
Liu, Q. et al. Development of a ruthenium/phosphite catalyst system for domino hydroformylation–reduction of olefins with carbon dioxide. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 6888–6894 (2014).
Song, L. et al. CO2= CO+[O]: recent advances in carbonylation of C–H bonds with CO2. Chem. Commun. 56, 8355–8367 (2020).
Wang, L., Sun, W. & Liu, C. Recent advances in homogeneous carbonylation using CO2 as CO surrogate. Chin. J. Chem. 36, 353–362 (2018).
Puga, A. V. & Corma, A. Hydrogenation of CO2 on nickel–iron nanoparticles under sunlight irradiation. Top. Catal. 61, 1810–1819 (2018).
Kim, D. H., Han, S. W., Yoon, H. S. & Kim, Y. D. Reverse water gas shift reaction catalyzed by Fe nanoparticles with high catalytic activity and stability. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 23, 67–71 (2015).
Chen, C.-S., Cheng, W.-H. & Lin, S.-S. Mechanism of CO formation in reverse water–gas shift reaction over Cu/Al2O3 catalyst. Catal. Lett. 68, 45–48 (2000).
Chen, C.-S., Cheng, W.-H. & Lin, S.-S. Study of reverse water gas shift reaction by TPD, TPR and CO2 hydrogenation over potassium-promoted Cu/SiO2 catalyst. Appl. Catal., A 238, 55–67 (2003).
Liu, Y. & Liu, D. Study of bimetallic Cu–Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 24, 351–354 (1999).
Xu, W., Ramírez, P. J., Stacchiola, D., Brito, J. L. & Rodriguez, J. A. The carburization of transition metal molybdates (MxMoO4, M=Cu, Ni or Co) and the generation of highly active metal/carbide catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation. Catal. Lett. 145, 1365–1373 (2015).
Wang, L. et al. Silica accelerates the selective hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol on cobalt catalysts. Nat. Commun. 11, 1033–1041 (2020).
Van Den Berg, R. et al. Structure sensitivity of Cu and CuZn catalysts relevant to industrial methanol synthesis. Nat. Commun. 7, 13057–13063 (2016).
Biesinger, M. C. Advanced analysis of copper X‐ray photoelectron spectra. Surf. Interface Anal. 49, 1325–1334 (2017).
Davydov, A. A. & Sheppard, N. Molecular Spectroscopy of Oxide Catalyst Surfaces (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003).
Wu, X.-F. et al. Transition-metal-catalyzed carbonylation reactions of olefins and alkynes: a personal account. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 1041–1053 (2014).
Kiss, G. Palladium-catalyzed Reppe carbonylation. Chem. Rev. 101, 3435–3456 (2001).
Gusevskaya, E. V., Jiménez‐Pinto, J. & Börner, A. Hydroformylation in the realm of scents. ChemCatChem 6, 382–411 (2014).
Pedersen, S. K. et al. Main element chemistry enables gas-cylinder-free hydroformylations. Nat. Catal. 3, 843–850 (2020).
Nakamura, E. & Kuwajima, I. Homoenolate anion precursor. Reaction of ester homoenol silyl ether with carbonyl compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 7360–7362 (1977).
Crudden, C. M. & Alper, H. The regioselective hydroformylation of vinylsilanes. a remarkable difference in the selectivity and reactivity of cobalt, rhodium, and iridium catalysts. J. Org. Chem. 59, 3091–3097 (1994).
Mallavarapu, G. R. et al. Investigation of the essential oil of cinnamon leaf grown at Bangalore and Hyderabad. Flavour Fragr. J. 10, 239–242 (1995).
Jagtap, S. A., Monflier, E., Ponchel, A. & Bhanage, B. M. Highly regio-selective hydroformylation of biomass derived eugenol using aqueous biphasic Rh/TPPTS/CDs as a greener and recyclable catalyst. Mol. Catal. 436, 157–163 (2017).
Ohara, T. et al. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, 2020).
Mahboub, M. J. D., Dubois, J.-L., Cavani, F., Rostamizadeh, M. & Patience, G. S. Catalysis for the synthesis of methacrylic acid and methyl methacrylate. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 7703–7738 (2018).
Drent, E. Process for the preparation of unsaturated carboxylate esters. US Patent US4670582A (1987).
Drent, E., Arnoldy, P. & Budzelaar, P. Efficient palladium catalysts for the carbonylation of alkynes. J. Organomet. Chem. 455, 247–253 (1993).
Brennführer, A., Neumann, H. & Beller, M. Palladium‐catalyzed carbonylation reactions of aryl halides and related compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 4114–4133 (2009).
Takács, E., Varga, C., Skoda-Földes, R. & Kollar, L. Facile synthesis of primary amides and ketoamides via a palladium-catalysed carbonylation–deprotection reaction sequence. Tetrahedron Lett. 48, 2453–2456 (2007).
Uozumi, Y., Arii, T. & Watanabe, T. Double carbonylation of aryl iodides with primary amines under atmospheric pressure conditions using the Pd/PPh3/DABCO/THF system. J. Org. Chem. 66, 5272–5274 (2001).
Lang, X. D. & He, L. N. Integration of CO2 reduction with subsequent carbonylation: towards extending chemical utilization of CO2. ChemSusChem 11, 2062–2067 (2018).
Drent, E., Arnoldy, P. & Budzelaar, P. Homogeneous catalysis by cationic palladium complexes. Precision catalysis in the carbonylation of alkynes. J. Organomet. Chem. 475, 57–63 (1994).
Liu, J. et al. Selective palladium-catalyzed carbonylation of alkynes: an atom-economic synthesis of 1, 4-dicarboxylic acid diesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10282–10288 (2018).
Straub, A. T., Otto, M., Usui, I. & Breit, B. Room temperature ambient pressure (RTAP)‐hydroformylation in water using a self‐assembling ligand. Adv. Synth. Catal. 44, 2071–2075 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support from the State of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, European Union, CADIAC, the iBOF (Next-BIOREF) and the EoS FWO/FNRS BioFact project (No. 30902231), for funding. B.U.W.M. thanks the Francqui Foundation for an appointment as Collen-Francqui professor. We thank Mr. Reinhard Eckelt for BET measurements, Mrs. Marga-Martina Pohl, Nils Rockstroh, Giovanni Agostini for TEM-XPS analysis, and Dr. Henrik Lund for the XRD results.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.S., Y.H., and R.R. contributed equally to this work. R.S., R.R., Y.H., R.J., H.J., and M.B. conceived and designed the experiments. R.R., R.S., and R.J. built the follow chemistry system and reaction equipment. R.R., R.S., H.N., and R.J. prepared the catalysts. R.S., R.R., Y.H., and G.M. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. H.A., and U.B. performed TPR and in situ IR analyses. R.S., R.R., Y.H., M.S., B.M., and M.B. co-wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Ganapati V. Shanbhag and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sang, R., Hu, Y., Razzaq, R. et al. A practical concept for catalytic carbonylations using carbon dioxide. Nat Commun 13, 4432 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32030-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32030-8
This article is cited by
-
A triple tandem reaction for the upcycling of products from poorly selective CO2 photoreduction systems
Nature Synthesis (2024)
-
Straightforward synthesis of functionalized γ-Lactams using impure CO2 stream as the carbon source
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Unlocking full and fast conversion in photocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction for applications in radio-carbonylation
Nature Communications (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.