Abstract

Chronic imaging windows in mice have been developed to allow intravital microscopy of many different organs and have proven to be of paramount importance in advancing our knowledge of normal and disease processes. A model system that allows long-term intravital imaging of lymph nodes would facilitate the study of cell behavior in lymph nodes during the generation of immune responses in a variety of disease settings and during the formation of metastatic lesions in cancer-bearing mice. We describe a chronic lymph node window (CLNW) surgical preparation that allows intravital imaging of the inguinal lymph node in mice. The CLNW is custom-made from titanium and incorporates a standard coverslip. It allows stable longitudinal imaging without the need for serial surgeries while preserving lymph node blood and lymph flow. We also describe how to build and use an imaging stage specifically designed for the CLNW to prevent (large) rotational changes as well as respiratory movement during imaging. The entire procedure takes approximately half an hour per mouse, and subsequently allows for longitudinal intravital imaging of the murine lymph node and surrounding structures for up to 14 d. Small-animal surgery experience is required to successfully carry out the protocol.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Investigation of the lack of angiogenesis in the formation of lymph node metastases. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 107 djv155 (2015).

  2. 2.

    , & Anatomy and nomenclature of murine lymph nodes: descriptive study and nomenclatory standardization in BALB/cAnNCrl mice. J. Immunol. Methods 312, 12–19 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Intravital microscopy of the peripheral lymph node microcirculation in mice. Microcirculation 3, 287–300 (1996).

  4. 4.

    et al. Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node. Science 296, 1869–1873 (2002).

  5. 5.

    et al. Dynamic imaging of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in lymph nodes. Science 296, 1873–1876 (2002).

  6. 6.

    et al. Selective imprinting of gut-homing T cells by Peyer's patch dendritic cells. Nature 424, 88–93 (2003).

  7. 7.

    , & T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature 427, 154–159 (2004).

  8. 8.

    et al. The cervical lymph node preparation: a novel approach to study lymphocyte homing by intravital microscopy. Inflamm. Res. 55, 160–167 (2006).

  9. 9.

    et al. Unexpected dissemination patterns in lymphoma progression revealed by serial imaging within a murine lymph node. Cancer Res. 72, 6111–6118 (2012).

  10. 10.

    et al. Modeling lymph flow and fluid exchange with blood vessels in lymph nodes. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 13, 234–247 (2015).

  11. 11.

    et al. The role of innate immunity in B cell acquisition of antigen within LNs. Adv. Immunol. 106, 1–19 (2010).

  12. 12.

    et al. In vivo imaging of tumors. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. (2010).

  13. 13.

    et al. Conventional and high-speed intravital multiphoton laser scanning microscopy of microvasculature, lymphatics, and leukocyte-endothelial interactions. Mol. Imaging 1, 9–15 (2002).

  14. 14.

    et al. Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging. Nat. Med. 15, 1219–1223 (2009).

  15. 15.

    et al. Optical biopsy of lymph node morphology using optical coherence tomography. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 4, 539–548 (2005).

  16. 16.

    et al. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography for assessing human lymph nodes for metastatic cancer. BMC Cancer 16, 144 (2016).

  17. 17.

    et al. Intravital imaging of metastatic behavior through a mammary imaging window. Nat. Methods 5, 1019–1021 (2008).

  18. 18.

    , & A novel rodent mammary window of orthotopic breast cancer for intravital microscopy. Microvasc. Res. 65, 109–117 (2003).

  19. 19.

    et al. Angiogenesis, microvascular architecture, microhemodynamics, and interstitial fluid pressure during early growth of human adenocarcinoma LS174T in SCID mice. Cancer Res. 52, 6553–6560 (1992).

  20. 20.

    et al. Technical report—a new chamber technique for microvascular studies in unanesthetized hamsters. Res. Exp. Med. 177, 125–134 (1980).

  21. 21.

    et al. Vascular permeability and microcirculation of gliomas and mammary carcinomas transplanted in rat and mouse cranial windows. Cancer Res. 54, 4564–4568 (1994).

  22. 22.

    et al. Chronic in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord using an implanted chamber. Nat. Methods 9, 297–302 (2012).

  23. 23.

    et al. A chronic window imaging device for the investigation of in vivo peripheral nerves. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2014, 1985–1988 (2014).

  24. 24.

    et al. Surgical implantation of an abdominal imaging window for intravital microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 8, 583–594 (2013).

  25. 25.

    et al. In vivo measurement of gene expression, angiogenesis and physiological function in tumors using multiphoton laser scanning microscopy. Nat. Med. 7, 864–868 (2001).

  26. 26.

    et al. Imaging steps of lymphatic metastasis reveals that vascular endothelial growth factor-C increases metastasis by increasing delivery of cancer cells to lymph nodes: therapeutic implications. Cancer Res. 66, 8065–8075 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NIH under award nos. R00CA137167 (T.P.P.), DP2OD008780 (T.P.P.), R01CA163528 (B.J.V.) and R01HL128168 (T.P.P.). Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Center for Biomedical OCT Research and Translation through grant no. P41EB015903 (B.J.V.), awarded by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the NIH. National Cancer Institute Federal Share of Proton Income grant CA059267 (T.P.P., B.J.V.) and the Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research ISF (T.P.P.) also supported this work. We thank J. Kahn, E. Beech and C. Cui for outstanding technical support.

Author information

Author notes

    • Eelco F J Meijer
    •  & Han-Sin Jeong

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    • Eelco F J Meijer
    • , Ethel R Pereira
    •  & Timothy P Padera
  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

    • Han-Sin Jeong
  3. Radiation Medicine Machine Shop, Department of Radiation Oncology, and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    • Thomas A Ruggieri
  4. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    • Cedric Blatter
    •  & Benjamin J Vakoc

Authors

  1. Search for Eelco F J Meijer in:

  2. Search for Han-Sin Jeong in:

  3. Search for Ethel R Pereira in:

  4. Search for Thomas A Ruggieri in:

  5. Search for Cedric Blatter in:

  6. Search for Benjamin J Vakoc in:

  7. Search for Timothy P Padera in:

Contributions

E.F.J.M and H.-S.J. developed the protocol. E.F.J.M. and T.P.P. wrote the manuscript. E.F.J.M. and E.R.P. performed the experiments, including supplementary video acquisition. C.B. and B.J.V. performed intravital imaging and processing of optical coherence tomography. E.F.J.M., E.R.P. and C.B. prepared in-text figures and supplementary videos. T.A.R. designed, developed and prepared the schematics presented in the supplementary figures. T.P.P. supervised all authors who participated in this project. All authors contributed intellectually to, and reviewed, the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy P Padera.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–10.

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Video 1. Short-term time-lapse intravital imaging using the CLNW.

    The CLNW is used to visualize lymph node neutrophil and monocyte movement (green) in LysM-GFP transgenic mice. Intravenously injected tetramethylrhodamine-dextran dye is used to trace the vasculature (red). Tetramethylrhodamine-dextran extravasation is visible in the top left quadrant. Collagen (blue) is acquired by SHG imaging. The time-lapse MPM movie was taken over 90 min at 1× zoom, stack depth ~45 μm (z-projected using ImageJ software), with a 1.05 NA 25× objective, 512 × 512 pixels, 16-bit. Resolution not enhanced. Scale bar, 50 μm. This experiment was approved by the IACUC at MGH.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Video 2. Short-term time-lapse intravital imaging using the CLNW.

    In this 30-min MPM movie, lymph node neutrophil and monocyte movement (green) is visualized in LysM-GFP transgenic mice. These cells can be seen flowing, rolling and extravasating in a lymph node high-endothelial venule (red), a specialized blood vessel in the lymph node used for lymphocyte migration. The blood vessel imaged is not directly (~130μ) below the cover slip, causing a reduced signal-to-noise ratio in the video but demonstrating the viability of MPM in deeper-situated regions of interest. Tetramethylrhodamine-dextran dye is used to trace the vasculature (red). Collagen (blue) is acquired by SHG imaging. Images acquired at 2× zoom, stack depth ~20 μm (z-projected using ImageJ software), with a 1.05 NA 25× objective, 256 × 256 pixels, 16-bit. Resolution not enhanced. Scale bar, 25 μm. This experiment was approved by the IACUC at MGH.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.045

Further reading Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.