Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Evaluation and management of pituitary incidentalomas—revisiting an acquaintance

Abstract

Incidentalomas of the pituitary gland have been described with increasing frequency, paralleling the advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Several approaches have been proposed in order to appropriately evaluate their impact on patients, some recommending extensive investigations, while others advocate a more focused and potentially more cost-effective approach. The first part of this article will review current data about the prevalence, natural history and potential morbidity associated with these tumors. The second part will focus on imaging and hormonal evaluation of the incidental mass and suggest an updated management algorithm.

Key Points

  • Pituitary incidentalomas are common and their course is usually benign

  • There is a broad spectrum of approaches to evaluation and management

  • Extensive testing carries risks, as does purely expectant management

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Simplified algorithm for the evaluation and management of a patient with an incidentally discovered pituitary mass

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Linos DA (1989) Adrenaloma: a better term than incidentaloma. Surgery 105: 456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chidiac RM and Aron DC (1997) Incidentalomas. A disease of modern technology. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 26: 233–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirilas P and Skandalakis JE (2002) Benign anatomical mistakes: incidentaloma. Am Surg 68: 1026–1028

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Molitch ME (1997) Pituitary incidentalomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 26: 725–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aron DC and Howlett TA (2000) Pituitary incidentalomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29: 205–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. King JT Jr et al. (1997) Management of incidental pituitary microadenomas: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 3625–3632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mavrakis AN and Tritos NA (2004) Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pituitary incidentalomas. Endocr Pract 10: 438–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Howlett TA et al. (2000) Management of pituitary incidentalomas. A survey of British and American endocrinologists. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29: 223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Molitch ME and Russell EJ (1990) The pituitary “incidentaloma”. Ann Intern Med 112: 925–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Teramoto A et al. (1994) Incidental pituitary lesions in 1,000 unselected autopsy specimens. Radiology 193: 161–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ezzat S et al. (2004) The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 101: 613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yue NC et al. (1997) Clinically serious abnormalities found incidentally at MR imaging of the brain: data from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology 202: 41–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nammour GM et al. (1997) Incidental pituitary macroadenoma: a population-based study. Am J Med Sci 314: 287–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolpert SM et al. (1984) Size, shape, and appearance of the normal female pituitary gland. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143: 377–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall WA et al. (1994) Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in normal human volunteers: occult adenomas in the general population. Ann Intern Med 120: 817–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Indrajit IK et al. (2001) Value of dynamic MRI imaging in pituitary adenomas. Ind J Radiol Imag 11: 185–190

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gao R et al. (2001) Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of pituitary adenomas: usefulness of sequential sagittal and coronal plane images. Eur J Radiol 39: 139–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freda PU and Post KD (1999) Differential diagnosis of sellar masses. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 28: 81–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aron DC et al. (1995) Pituitary tumors. Current concepts in diagnosis and management. West J Med 162: 340–352

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Molitch ME (1995) Clinical review 65. Evaluation and treatment of the patient with a pituitary incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 3–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feldkamp J et al. (1999) Incidentally discovered pituitary lesions: high frequency of macroadenomas and hormone-secreting adenomas—results of a prospective study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51: 109–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oyama K et al. (2005) Management of pituitary incidentalomas: according to a survey of pituitary incidentalomas in Japan. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26: 47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ambrosi B et al. (1991) Epidemiology of pituitary tumors. In Pituitary Adenomas: New Trends in Basic and Clinical Research, 159–168 (Eds Faglia G et al.) New York: Elsevier Science

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sakharova AA et al. (2005) Clinically silent somatotropinomas may be biochemically active. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 2117–2121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishizawa S et al. (1998) Therapeutic strategy for incidentally found pituitary tumors (“pituitary incidentalomas”). Neurosurgery 43: 1344–1348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanno N et al. (2003) A survey of pituitary incidentaloma in Japan. Eur J Endocrinol 149: 123–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Donovan LE and Corenblum B (1995) The natural history of the pituitary incidentaloma. Arch Intern Med 155: 181–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reincke M et al. (1990) The 'incidentaloma' of the pituitary gland. Is neurosurgery required? JAMA 263: 2772–2776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulkarni MV et al. (1988) 1.5-T MR imaging of pituitary microadenomas: technical considerations and CT correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9: 5–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson MR et al. (1992) The evaluation of patients with a suspected pituitary microadenoma: computer tomography compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 36: 335–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Connor SE and Penney CC (2003) MRI in the differential diagnosis of a sellar mass. Clin Radiol 58: 20–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Webb SM et al. (1992) Computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study in hypothalamic–pituitary and parasellar pathology. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 36: 459–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Davis PC et al. (1985) CT-surgical correlation in pituitary adenomas: evaluation in 113 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 6: 711–716

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaltsas GA et al. (2005) Clinical review: diagnosis and management of pituitary carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 3089–3099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Turner HE et al. (1998) Pituitary, adrenal and thyroid incidentalomas. Endocr Relat Cancer 5: 131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sam S and Molitch ME (2005) The pituitary mass: diagnosis and management. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 6: 55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Snyder PJ (2006) UpToDate version 13.3 [http://uptodateonline.com/application/topic.asp?file=pituitar/8469] (accessed 2 January 2006)

  38. Delgrange E et al. (1996) Potential hook effect in prolactin assay in patients with giant prolactinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45: 506–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schofl C et al. (2002) Falsely low serum prolactin in two cases of invasive macroprolactinoma. Pituitary 5: 261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Frieze TW et al. (2002) “Hook effect” in prolactinomas: case report and review of literature. Endocr Pract 8: 296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. St-Jean E et al. (1996) High prolactin levels may be missed by immunoradiometric assay in patients with macroprolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 44: 305–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Molitch ME (2005) Medication-induced hyperprolactinemia. Mayo Clin Proc 80: 1050–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gibney J et al. (2005) Clinical relevance of macroprolactin. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 62: 633–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Aron DC (1995) Hormonal screening in the patient with an incidentally discovered pituitary mass: current practice and factors in clinical decision making. Endocrinologist 5: 357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Findling JW and Raff H (2005) Screening and diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 34: 385–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Raff H et al. (2003) New enzyme immunoassay for salivary cortisol. Clin Chem 49: 203–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yaneva M et al. (2004) Midnight salivary cortisol for the initial diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome of various causes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 3345–3351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sippel RS and Chen H (2004) Subclinical Cushing's syndrome in adrenal incidentalomas. Surg Clin North Am 84: 875–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Emral R et al. (2003) Prevalence of subclinical Cushing's syndrome in 70 patients with adrenal incidentaloma: clinical, biochemical and surgical outcomes. Endocr J 50: 399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Catargi B et al. (2003) Occult Cushing's syndrome in type-2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 5808–5813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Reincke M (2000) Subclinical Cushing's syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29: 43–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rossi R et al. (2000) Subclinical Cushing's syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma: clinical and biochemical features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 1440–1448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hadjidakis D et al. (2003) Does subclinical hypercortisolism adversely affect the bone mineral density of patients with adrenal incidentalomas? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58: 72–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tauchmanova L et al. (2002) Patients with subclinical Cushing's syndrome due to adrenal adenoma have increased cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 4872–4878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Nagai T et al. (2002) Subclinical Cushing's disease accompanied by malignant hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Intern Med 41: 566–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Contreras LN et al. (2000) Detection of preclinical Cushing's syndrome in overweight type 2 diabetic patients. Medicina (B Aires) 60: 326–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bernini G et al. (2003) Anthropometric, haemodynamic, humoral and hormonal evaluation in patients with incidental adrenocortical adenomas before and after surgery. Eur J Endocrinol 148: 213–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Libe R et al. (2002) Long-term follow-up study of patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 147: 489–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Barzon L et al. (2002) Development of overt Cushing's syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol 146: 61–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Aron.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krikorian, A., Aron, D. Evaluation and management of pituitary incidentalomas—revisiting an acquaintance. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2, 138–145 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0122

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing