Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitance in graphene-coupled titanium oxide enabling ultra-fast sodium storage and long-term cycling


Sodium-ion batteries are emerging as a highly promising technology for large-scale energy storage applications. However, it remains a significant challenge to develop an anode with superior long-term cycling stability and high-rate capability. Here we demonstrate that the Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitance in TiO2/graphene nanocomposites enables high-rate capability and long cycle life in a sodium-ion battery. This hybrid electrode exhibits a specific capacity of above 90 mA h g−1 at 12,000 mA g−1 (36 C). The capacity is highly reversible for more than 4,000 cycles, the longest demonstrated cyclability to date. First-principle calculations demonstrate that the intimate integration of graphene with TiO2 reduces the diffusion energy barrier, thus enhancing the Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitive process. The Na-ion intercalation pseudocapacitance enabled by tailor-deigned nanostructures represents a promising strategy for developing electrode materials with high power density and long cycle life.


Over the past few decades, tremendous efforts have been focused on the development of lithium ion batteries (LIBs) used in portable electric devices and electric vehicles because of their high energy density and long cycle life1,2,3,4,5. Nowadays, the main concerns about LIBs lie in the growing cost and limited resources of lithium. In contrast, sodium ion batteries (SIBs) represent potential alternatives for large-scale energy storage because of low cost and resource abundance6,7,8. Recently, a variety of cathode materials have been investigated for SIBs, for instance, Na3V2(PO4)3 (ref. 9), P2-NaxVO2 (ref. 10), olivine-type sodium metal phosphates11 and Prussian blue12. For anode materials in SIBs, various carbon materials have been reported because of their relatively high capacity and cyclability13,14,15. Among them, graphite is an intriguing material with different lithium and sodium storage properties (372 mA h g−1 in LIBs, but less than 35 mA h g−1 in SIBs). Intriguingly, Wang and co-workers14 reported on an expanded graphite that delivered a high capacity of 284 mA h g−1 and long cycle life by expanding the interlayer of graphite from 0.34 to 0.43 nm. Co-intercalation between graphite and diglyme-based electrolyte could also achieve a relatively high capacity of 90 mA h g−1 and long cycle life15. Recent findings have shown that the anode materials for SIBs based on alloy-type (for example, metallic and intermetallic materials16,17,18,19) and conversion-type (for example, sulfides20,21,22,23) exhibited high initial capacity, but suffered from poor cyclability most likely due to the large volume change and the sluggish kinetics. In addition, organic anode materials (for example, Na2C8H4O4) and carboxylate-based materials have been investigated as anode materials for SIBs24,25, but the electronic conductivity and cyclability still remain the significant challenge. Besides the aforementioned anode candidates, metal oxide materials26, especially Ti-based oxide materials were also proposed as anode materials for SIBs. Xiong and co-workers27 reported the first TiO2-based anode for SIBs by using amorphous TiO2 nanowires grown on a Ti substrate, which delivered a gradually increasing capacity of up to 120 mA h g−1 at 50 mA g−1. Recently, Myung et al.28 reported that a thin carbon layer coated on anatase TiO2 nanorods helped enhance rate capability. They also proposed that the sodiation process of anatase nanorods is an intercalation reaction instead of an alloying reaction. Despite these advances, the long-term cyclability and detailed sodium storage mechanisms still need to be further explored. Another type of TiO2, termed TiO2-B, has also aroused interest as an anode for SIBs29. For insertion-type anodes, the tradeoff between structural stability and capacity should be taken into account. It is highly challenging but desirable to find an effective way to enhance the electrochemistry without sacrificing the stability of the host structure.

Recently, pseudocapacitive charge storage that is not a diffusion-controlled process demonstrates superior high-rate performance and reversibility30,31,32,33. Previous works by Dunn and co-workers30 show great promise towards high-rate electrodes in LIBs driven by an intercalation pseudocapacitive mechanism. Inspired by this, it is highly expected to achieve superior rate capability and long cycle life of SIBs by introducing intercalation pseudocapacitive charge storage mechanism in electrodes. As far as we know, there have been several investigations focused on the surface redox reaction pseudocapacitance in a thin-film electrode of SIBs with most of the active material at the surface or subsurface31,34, rather than the intercalation pseudocapacitance.

Here we report a SIB anode material, the graphene-coupled TiO2 sandwich-like hybrid (referred to as G-TiO2). The G-TiO2 electrode exhibits a superior rate capability and a super long-term cyclability. We first demonstrated that intercalation pseudocapacitance dominates the charge storage process in the G-TiO2 SIB anode, which contributes to the excellent rate capability and long-term stability. Furthermore, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were further performed to identify the structural characteristics and the sodiation mechanism of the G-TiO2 electrode.


Morphology and structure of the sandwich-like G-TiO2

The G-TiO2 hybrid was prepared by a rapid microwave-assisted in-situ reduction-hydrolysis route using TiCl3 and graphene oxide (GO) in ethylene glycol as the precursor (the detailed procedure is described in the Methods section). A subsequent heat treatment in air removed the residual organics and improved the crystallinity of the product. The experimental and simulated X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the product with Rietveld refinement are presented in Fig. 1a. The XRD peaks can be indexed to the monoclinic TiO2-B phase (JCPDF No. 74–1940) and tetragonal anatase (JCPDF No. 65–5714), respectively. Anatase TiO2 may originate from the partial transformation of metastable TiO2-B under heating treatment35,36,37,38. Refinement results quantify a mass percentage of ca. 76.9% for the TiO2-B phase (the calculation details are presented in Supplementary Method), which can be further confirmed by Raman analysis based on the peak areas of Raman spectra (74%, Supplementary Fig. 1). The morphology of the product was identified by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Fig. 1b, three-dimensional microsheet-connected networks with macropores could be distinctly observed. The SEM image at a higher magnification (Fig. 1c) reveals that there are numerous nanosheet arrays on both sides of the graphene sheets, forming a sandwich-like microstructure. The TEM image in Fig. 1d further confirms the unique nanosheet-on-microsheet sandwich-like architecture. Meanwhile, a nanoporous feature could also be observed in Fig. 1d,e, which is further evidenced by the nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurement (Supplementary Fig. 2). Interestingly, numerous tiny nanoclusters (3–5 nm) are also formed on the graphene sheet (Fig. 1e). The high-resolution TEM image (Fig. 1f) reveals clear lattices with spacings of 0.62 and 0.35 nm, respectively, indicating the existence of both TiO2-B and anatase TiO2. The carbon content in the G-TiO2 hybrid is evaluated to be about 10 wt% by thermogravimetry (TG) analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Figure 1: Morphology and structure of the G-TiO2 hybrid.
figure 1

(a) XRD patterns for the G-TiO2 product with Rietveld refinement, quantifying the content of ca 76.9 wt.% for the TiO2-B phase. Calculation details were supplemented in Supplementary Method 1. (b) Low-magnification SEM image for G-TiO2, demonstrating a three-dimensional porous morphology. (c) High-magnification SEM image for G-TiO2, revealing the structural detail of an individual microsheet. (d,e) TEM images for G-TiO2, indicating that tiny nanosheet arrays and nanoparticles co-anchor on the graphene sheet. (f) High-resolution TEM image, clear lattices with spacings of 0.62 and 0.35 nm are assigned to the (001) plane of TiO2-B and (101) plane of anatase, respectively. (g) EPR spectra for the G-TiO2 and T-NSs products. (h,i) High-resolution XPS spectra of C 1 s and O 1 s in the G-TiO2 product.

The surface chemical bonding state of the G-TiO2 hybrid was determined by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The sample of TiO2 nanosheets (T-NSs) without GO do not exhibit characteristic EPR response, whereas the G-TiO2 hybrid presents a distinct EPR signal with a g value of 1.948, indicating the existence of Ti3+ on the surface of the material (Fig. 1g)39,40. The existence of Ti3+ was further confirmed by the high-resolution XPS spectra of C 1 s and O 1 s (Fig 1h,i). The peaks at 285.0, 286.5 and 288.5 eV are associated with the carbon species from the graphene or the atmosphere. The peak at 283.5 eV suggests the existence of the Ti-C bonds in the G-TiO2 (ref. 40), which is also revealed by the O 1 s peak at 531.5 eV for the O-Ti3+ bond. The combination of the EPR and XPS results suggests that TiO2 nanosheets and/or nanoclusters are chemically bonded with the graphene matrix rather than physical adsorption.

Sodium ion storage performance

Figure 2 demonstrates the representative galvanostatic cycling profiles for the G-TiO2 electrode obtained at 500 mA g−1. The potential profiles are sloping curves, delivering a discharge capacity of 149 mA h g−1. Importantly, the polarization between the charge/discharge curves is very small (ΔE=0.1 V). Furthermore, the sodium ion storage is mainly below 1.5 V with an average discharging voltage plateau at 0.8 V, much lower than those in a lithium cell (1.5 V for TiO2-B and 1.75 V for anatase TiO2). Further DFT calculations of the voltage profiles based on the sodium intercalation energies in bulk TiO2-B with sodium concentrations of x=0.065–0.5 demonstrate an average discharging voltage of 1.0 V, slightly higher (0.2 V) than the experimental value (Supplementary Fig. 4). Despite the calculation error caused by the overbinding of sodium metal and problems with dispersion term41, there are two factors that result in the differences between the experimental and calculated voltages: (i) polarization in the electrode material; (ii) sodiation energetic kinetics differences between nanosized and bulk TiO2 materials. As polarization is dependent on the current density (namely, higher current densities would lead to bigger polarizations), the difference in the applied current densities of the experimental and calculated data (500 mA h g−1 for the former and infinitely near zero at the equilibrium state for the latter) should be partially responsible for the difference between the two voltages. Previous works reveal that the alkalization potential of nanosized materials could differ from their corresponding bulk materials, due to the alkalization energetic kinetics differences between them42. Lower average lithiation potentials in nanosized TiO2 than bulk TiO2 materials have been observed in several TiO2-Li cells43,44. Similar effects on the average sodiation potentials are observed in the present work, possibly resulting from the ultrafine nanocrystals in the TiO2-graphene hybrid. As a negative electrode, the lower operation voltage in SIBs than in LIBs would lead to a higher energy density of full cells45. Meanwhile, the relatively higher sodiation voltage than hard carbon (0.1 V) and Na2Ti3O7 (0.3 V) makes the G-TiO2 much safer and avoids the formation of dendrites upon cycling46.

Figure 2: Electrochemical performance of the G-TiO2 electrode.
figure 2

(a) Galvanostatic cycling profile with a narrow ΔE. (b) Rate performance at various current densities from 50 to 12,000 mA g−1. (c) Charge–discharge profiles from selected cycles of 100th to 4,000th at 500 mA g−1. (d) Long-term cycling performance at a current density of 500 mA g−1 (2 C).

Another attractive property of the chemically bonded G-TiO2 electrode is the superior rate performance, as presented in Fig. 2b. It can deliver reversible capacities of 265, 187, 149, 125, 114 and 102 mA h g−1 at 50, 200, 500, 1,500, 3,000, and 6,000 mA g−1, respectively. More excitingly, at an extremely high current density of 12,000 mA g−1 (ca 36 C, assuming 1 C=330 mA g−1), a surprisingly high capacity of more than 90 mA h g−1 can still be retained. To the best of our knowledge, this is the best rate capability among all reported Ti-based anode materials as well as the hard carbon and other metal oxides for SIBs28,29,47,48.

Long-term cyclability is crucial but challenging for rechargeable SIBs, due to the difficulty in the insertion/extraction of the large sodium ions within the host, as well as the side reactions between the electrode and the electrolyte upon long-term cycling. In this regard, we have evaluated the cycling stability of the G-TiO2 electrode. Figure 2d shows the long-term cycling performance of the G-TiO2 electrode for over 4,300 cycles at a current rate of 500 mA g−1. After a slow capacity fading in the initial dozens of cycles, a reversible capacity of 120 mA h g−1 keeps unchanged during the subsequent cycles, indicating a superior long-term cyclability. As far as we know, this is the longest cycle life up to date for both anode and cathode materials for SIBs using nonaqueous electrolytes7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,32,33,34,47,48. We should also note that the Coulombic efficiency increased gradually up to 91.8% during the initial cycles. The irreversible capacity loss during initial cycles may result from the formation of a solid electrolyte interface film (caused by reactions between the surface –OH groups of titania and the carbonate-based electrolyte)49, and the irreversible trapping of sodium ions at active sites of the graphene matrix50. It was reported that a pre-sodiation or chemical treatment could mitigate the irreversible capacity loss28,49. By replacing polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) with sodium polyacrylate (PAA-Na) as the binder or pretreating the G-TiO2 hybrid material with butyl lithium, the initial Coulombic efficiency can be enhanced from 31.4% to 57.0% and 58.4%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 5). Furthermore, a combined use of the PAA-Na binder and pretreatment leads to a much higher initial Coulombic efficiency, up to 80.6% (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 1). Our preliminary results demonstrate that the irreversible capacity loss of the G-TiO2 electrode upon cycling could be further reduced by optimizing the binder or the electrode surface. Figure 2c shows the galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles for the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, and 4,000th cycles. They possess an average voltage plateau at 0.8 V, revealing the structural stability and the high reversibility of the insertion/extraction of sodium ions within the host material. When the potential window is narrowed to 0.05−1.5 V, there is no significant change of the voltage curves (Supplementary Fig. 6), despite a slightly decrease in discharge capacity (110 mA h g−1, ca 10 mA h g−1 lower than the former). For comparison, we also explored the electrochemical performances of two pristine TiO2 nanostructures: (i) T-NSs that were prepared at the similar conditions for G-TiO2 except using GO and (ii) TiO2 nanobelts (T-NBs) obtained according to ref. 51. It was found that the electrode made of pristine TiO2 nanosheets exhibited a much lower capacity of 70 mA h g−1, corresponding to 0.21 Na insertion into a formula of TiO2 (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Its capacity decayed drastically to below 20 mA h g−1 after 50 cycles. Similarly, the performance of the T-NBs electrode was also much worse than that of G-TiO2 (Supplementary Fig. 7b). The synergistic effect from nanostructuring and hybridization might contribute to the substantial enhancement of the G-TiO2 electrode, where the electronic/ionic conductivity is improved, and high reversibility of chemically bonded G-TiO2 is achieved.

Furthermore, STEM and HR-TEM images, energy dispersive X-ray elemental mappings and selected-area electron diffraction patterns confirm that the microstructure of the strongly coupled G-TiO2 hybrid is well maintained even after 4,300 discharge/charge cycles (Supplementary Fig. 8). More importantly, the unique graphene-TiO2 interface in the G-TiO2 hybrid provides a more feasible pathway for Na+ insertion/extraction and prompts an intercalation pseudocapacitive behaviour of Na+ in the G-TiO2 electrode. It is highly beneficial to the fast transport of Na+, thus leading to superior rate capability and long cycle life.

Kinetics analysis

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) has been proven to be a powerful technique to evaluate the electrochemical kinetics of electrode materials towards Li+ or Na+ (refs 30, 31, 32, 33). Here, kinetic analysis based on CV analysis was carried out to gain further insight into the electrochemistry of the G-TiO2/Na cell. Figure 3a displays the typical CV curves for the G-TiO2 electrode during initial five cycles at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. A pair of broad cathodic/anodic peaks are located at 0.75/0.85 V with a small voltage offset of 0.1 V, which agree well with the galvanostatic cycling profile. Meanwhile, the CV curves from the 3rd to the 5th cycle are overlapped, showing an excellent reversibility of the G-TiO2 electrode. The CV curves at various scan rates from 0.1 to 100 mV s−1 display similar shapes with broad peaks during both cathodic and anodic processes. It is interesting to note that the small peak separations (0.1 V) are nearly identical if the scan rate increases from 0.1 to 2 mV s−1 (inset of Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 9), demonstrating small polarization at high rates. According to the relationship between the measured current (i) and the scan rate (v)52:

Figure 3: Kinetics analysis of the electrochemical behaviour towards Na+ for the G-TiO2 electrode.
figure 3

(a) CV curves from 1st to 5th cycles at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. The open circuit potential (OCP) is ca 2.38 V. (b) CV curves at various scan rates, from 0.1 to 100 mV s−1. (c) Determination of the b-value using the relationship between peak current and scan rate. (d) Capacity versus scan rate−1/2. (e) Separation of the capacitive and diffusion currents in G-TiO2 at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1. (f) Contribution ratio of the capacitive and diffusion-controlled charge versus scan rate.

the b-value can be determined by the slope of the log(v)–log(i) plots. In particular, the b-value of 0.5 indicates a total diffusion-controlled behaviour, whereas 1.0 represents a capacitive process. The log(v)–log(i) plots for the G-TiO2 electrode is shown in Fig. 3c. The b-value of 0.94 for both cathodic and anodic peaks can be quantified at scan rates from 0.1 to 10 mV s−1, suggesting the kinetics of capacitive characteristics. A decrease of slope takes place at scan rates above 10 mV s−1, reflecting a decrease of b-value from 0.94 to 0.56 for both cathodic and anodic peaks. Similar observations were reported on a T-Nb2O5/Li cell by Dunn et al.30 The limitation to the rate capability should be attributed to an increase of the ohmic contribution and/or diffusion constrains upon an ultra-fast scan rate. The b-value of 0.56 close to 0.5 evidences the limitation of the slow diffusion. The plot of capacity versus v−1/2 demonstrates that the capacity does not vary significantly as the scan rate increases in the range of 0.1–2 mV s−1 (Fig. 3d). This indicates that capacitive contributions are independent of the scan rate. In contrast, the linear decrease of capacity upon the increase of scan rate in the region of >10 mV s−1 reflects a rate-limited diffusion process. The total capacitive contribution at a certain scan rate could be quantified on the base of separating the specific contribution from the capacitive and diffusion-controlled charge at a fixed voltage. As shown in Fig. 3e, the diffusion-controlled charge is mainly generated at around the peak voltage, indicating that the diffusion process is feasible at this region and corresponds to a redox reaction between Ti4+/Ti3+ (ref. 44). Based on the quantification, 78.2% of the total charge (therefore, the capacity) is capacitive at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1. Contribution ratios between the two different processes at other scan rates were also quantified. The quantified results (Fig. 3f) show that the capacitive capacity is improved gradually with increasing the scan rate, and finally reaches a maximum value of 90.2% at 10 mV s−1.


The Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitive behaviour of the G-TiO2 hybrid is attributed to the unique chemically bonded hybrid structure that provides a more feasible channel for Na+ insertion/extraction in the graphene–TiO2 interface. First-principle calculations were performed to obtain further insight into the Na+ dynamics in the G-TiO2 hybrid and to testify this hypothesis. As the main phase of the hybrid is TiO2-B, only TiO2-B was taken into account in the first-principle calculations. From the voltage profiles (Fig. 2e), it is observed that the voltage drops monotonically from 1.15 V down to 0.05 V. This suggests a solid-solution reaction of sodium with TiO2 at an average voltage of 0.8 V. The calculated voltage profiles show a similar dropping trend, despite the slightly higher values for the calculated voltages (Supplementary Fig. 4).

To gain further insight into the sodiation dynamics, sodium-diffusion barriers of various trajectories were also investigated by first-principle calculations. In bulk TiO2-B, three typical sodium-diffusion paths were considered, as presented in Supplementary Fig. 10. The energy barriers for path i, ii and iii were 3.0, 4.9 and 2.2 eV, respectively, which are similar to the previous report on a TiO2-B-Li battery41. It is reasonable that the energy barriers for sodium insertion into the TiO2-B host are higher than that of lithiation, considering the bigger radius of Na+. It means that path i along the [001] direction and path iii along the [010] direction are more accessible for Na+ diffusion than path ii ([100] direction). Interestingly, much more feasible paths could be formed at the fully bonded graphene–TiO2-B interface in the hybrid (Supplementary Fig. 11). The energy barriers for path iii are reduced to be 1.5 eV. Considering the existence of surface defects in the TiO2 nanocrystals, surface –OH groups49, and the mismatching between TiO2-B and graphene lattices, surface oxygen atoms cannot be entirely bonded with the carbon atoms of graphene. The dominated situation should be the partially bonded model, where a part of surface O atoms would be passivated by a neighbouring surface O atom (Ti−Osurf.−Osurf.−Ti) or surface –OH groups (Ti−Osurf.−Η), rather than the formation of Ti−O−C bonds, to achieve a lower total energy of the system (Supplementary Fig. 12). Owing to the reduction of bonded surface oxygen atoms, the restriction to graphene by the TiO2-B nanocrystals becomes weaker, resulting in the slightly bending of graphene plate (Fig. 4). Consequently, the tunnel along the [010] direction will be more open and feasible for sodium transport, giving rise to a much lower activation energy barrier of 0.2 eV (Fig. 4, unbounded surface O atoms reconstitute to form Ti−Osurf.−Osurf.−Ti) or 0.45 eV (Supplementary Fig. 13, unbounded surface O atoms were passivated by the –OH groups). The isolated sodium diffusion should be much different from a certain concentration region in this system. In fact, the pervious results on the lithium diffusion in anatase TiO2 with the Li concentration of 10–50% revealed that an increase in Li concentration resulted in a decrease in effective barrier (namely, it would be more diffusive with an increased Li concentration)53. It is much likely to occur in our system that the diffusion of sodium ions will be more feasible upon increasing sodium concentration. These calculation results agree well with the experimental results presented above.

Figure 4: Na diffusion in the partially bonded graphene–TiO2-B (001) interface.
figure 4

(a) Illustration of the partially bonded graphene–TiO2-B (001) interface. (b) Top-view of a, illustrating the Na diffusion path along the [010] direction from Na1 to Na10 sites. (c) Migration activation energy of the Na+ ion diffusing along the [010] direction in bulk TiO2-B, fully bonded and partially bonded graphene–TiO2-B (001) interface calculated with DFT.

In summary, the chemically bonded graphene-TiO2 hybrid demonstrates a reversible capacity of 265 mA h g−1 at 50 mA g−1 and more than 90 mA h g−1 at 12,000 mA g−1 (36 C), displaying the best rate capability compared with the ever reported Ti-based anodes for SIBs. More encouragingly, the hybrid electrode shows an ultra-long cycling life as demonstrated by over 4,300 cycles, representing the best cyclability among all ever reported SIBs using nonaqueous electrolytes. Kinetics analysis reveals an interesting Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitive behaviour in the G-TiO2 sodium cell and a high contribution of capacitive charge. This pseudocapacitive behaviour is highly beneficial to fast charge storage and long-term cyclability. Further sodiation dynamics analysis based on first-principle calculations shows that the hybridization of graphene with TiO2 nanocrystals provides a more feasible channel at the graphene–TiO2 interface for sodium intercalation/deintercalation with a much lower energy barrier. Our findings will open up new opportunities for developing electrode materials of SIBs and hold great promise for the development of long-life SIBs for next-generation large-scale energy storage applications.


Materials synthesis

The G-TiO2 hybrid was prepared by a microwave-assisted reduction-hydrolysis route. The mixture of TiCl3 (1 ml, 15 wt% in dilute hydrochloric acid solution), ethylene glycol (15 ml, anhydrous) and GO (2 ml, 13 mg ml−1, prepared via a modified Hummers method54) was sealed in a glass vessel and treated in a microwave synthesizer (2.45 GHz, 300 W, Discover S-Class, CEM) at 155 °C for 30 min. The black product was collected by centrifugation, and washed with DI water and ethanol for five times. After dry at 80 °C overnight, the black powder was heated at 350 °C for 4 h in air to remove the residual organics, and finally the G-TiO2 product was obtained. In a control experiment, the T-NSs product was prepared by a similar method to that of G-TiO2 except the use of GO. The T-NBs product was prepared according to the previous report51. For the pretreatment procedure, the materials treated with bultyl lithium were obtained by dispersing G-TiO2 powder (128 mg) in 25 ml of hexane and adding dropwise into a suspension of bultyl lithium hexane solution (0.25 ml, 1.6 M). After stirred for 3 h, the suspension was filtered and washed with hexane, and dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 8 h.

Materials characterization

The morphology and structure of the products were investigated by SEM (SIRION200), TEM, XRD (PANalytical B.V.) and XPS (VG MultiLab 2000 system with a monochromatic A1 Kα X-ray source, Thermo VG Scientific). TG analysis was carried out in air atmosphere from 40 to 750 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. Nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms and pore size distribution were collected at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASPA 2020 analyzer. EPR measurements were performed on a Bruker EMX spectrometer equipped with a cylindrical cavity operating at a 100 kHz field modulation at 77 K. Raman spectra were obtained on a Renishaw Invia spectrometer with an Ar+ laser of 514.5 nm at room temperature.

Electrochemical measurements

The working electrodes were prepared by mixing 70 wt% active material, 20 wt% super P and 10 wt% PVDF dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (for comparison, PVDF was also replaced by PAA-Na to mitigate the irreversible capacity loss), and then coated onto a Cu foil and dried at 80 °C for 24 h before testing. The mass loading of the active material is about 2.5 mg cm−2. The testing cell contains the working electrode, sodium metal as the counter and reference electrode, glass fibre membrane (GF/D, Whatman) as the separator and 1 M NaClO4 in a mixture of ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate (2:1 by volume) as the electrolyte. Galvanostatic charge–discharge tests were carried out on a Land Battery Measurement System (Land) at various current densities with a cutoff potential window of 0.05–3 V at room temperature. CV measurements at various scan rates from 0.1 to 100 mV s−1 were carried out on a PARSTAT 2273 potentiostat.

DFT calculations

First-principle calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package55 within the projector augmented-wave approach. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) exchange-correlation function developed by Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof56 was used and the cutoff of the kinetic energy was set to 400 eV for all calculations. As the Ti-based oxides are strongly correlated electron systems, the DFT+U method was used with the Dudarev approach57 implemented in Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package, where U is the on-site Coulomb parameter to calculate the average voltages of Na intercalating into TiO2-B. On the other hand, the standard GGA functional is used instead of the GGA+U functional for the diffusion barrier calculations to avoid the mixing charge transfer barrier of alkali atoms hoping overestimated by the GGA+U method45. The k-points were sampled on a Γ-centred Monkhorst-Pack grid of 4 × 8 × 6 for the unit cell and the geometry was allowed to relax until Hellmann–Feynman force on each atom was less than 0.05 eV Å−1. The minimum energy paths and activation barriers of Na diffusion along different channels were calculated by the climbing nudged elastic band method58 for the bulk TiO2-B and TiO2-B–graphene interface. For Na diffusion in bulk TiO2-B, a 1 × 2 × 1 supercell was used to minimize the interaction between the periodic images. To model the TiO2-B–graphene interface, a 1 × 2 supercell of TiO2-B (001) slab square lattice (12.29 × 7.55 Å) with thickness of about 10 Å was constructed to match with the graphene square lattice with a 3 × 3 supercell (12.78 × 7.38 Å), including 36 C atoms. The lattice mismatch in each direction was less than 5%. For more precise results, a vacuum thickness of 20 Å was set along c axis for the TiO2-B–graphene to avoid the interaction between neighbouring images.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Chen, C. et al. Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitance in graphene-coupled titanium oxide enabling ultra-fast sodium storage and long-term cycling. Nat. Commun. 6:6929 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7929 (2015).


  1. Bruce, P. G., Scrosati, B. & Tarascon, J. M. Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 2930–2946 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn, B., Kamath, H. & Tarascon, J. M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334, 928–935 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodenough, J. B. Electrochemical energy storage in a sustainable modern society. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 14–18 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis, B. L., Lee, K. T. & Nazar, L. F. Positive electrode materials for Li-Ion and Li-batteries. Chem. Mater. 22, 691–714 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi, N. S. et al. Challenges facing lithium batteries and electrical double-layer capacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9994–10024 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Islam, M. S. & Fisher, C. A. J. Lithium and sodium battery cathode materials: computational insights into voltage, diffusion and nanostructural properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 185–204 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, Y. et al. Direct atomic-scale confirmation of three-phase storage mechanism in Li4Ti5O12 anodes for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun 4, 1870 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y. et al. A zero-strain layered metal oxide as the negative electrode for long-life sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun 4, 2365 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jian, Z. L. et al. Superior electrochemical performance and storage mechanism of Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater 3, 156–160 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guignard, M. et al. P2-NaxVO2 system as electrodes for batteries and electron-correlated materials. Nat. Mater. 12, 74–80 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, K. T., Ramesh, T. N., Nan, F., Botton, G. & Nazar, L. F. Topochemical synthesis of sodium metal phosphate olivines for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 23, 3593–3600 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, Y. H., Wang, L., Cheng, J. G. & Goodenough, J. B. Prussian blue: a new framework of electrode materials for sodium batteries. Chem. Commun. 48, 6544–6546 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lotfabad, E. M. et al. High-density sodium and lithium ion battery anodes from banana peels. ACS Nano 8, 7115–7129 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wen, Y. et al. Expanded graphite as superior anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun 5, 4033 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jache, B. & Adelhelm, P. Use of graphite as a highly reversible electrode with superior cycle life for sodium-ion batteries by making use of co-intercalation phenomena. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 10169–10173 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farbod, B. et al. Anodes for sodium ion batteries based on tin-germanium-antimony alloys. ACS Nano 8, 4415–4429 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, Y. H., Zhu, Y. J., Liu, Y. H. & Wang, C. S. Electrochemical performance of porous carbon/tin composite anodes for sodium-ion and lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater 3, 128–133 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, D. Y. W. et al. High-capacity antimony sulphide nanoparticle-decorated graphene composite as anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun 4, 2922 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, L. et al. Sb-C nanofibers with long cycle life as an anode material for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 323–328 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qu, B. et al. Layered SnS2-reduced graphene oxide composite–a high-capacity, high-rate, and long-cycle life sodium-ion battery anode material. Adv. Mater. 26, 3854–3859 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. David, L., Bhandavat, R. & Singh, G. MoS2/graphene composite paper for sodium-ion battery electrodes. ACS Nano 8, 1759–1770 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Y. et al. Reversible sodium storage via conversion reaction in MoS2/C composite. Chem. Commun. 50, 10730–10733 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu, C., Mu, X., van Aken, P. A., Yu, Y. & Maier, J. Single-layered ultrasmall nanoplates of MoS2 embedded in carbon nanofibers with excellent electrochemical performance for lithium and sodium storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 2152–2156 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Park, Y. et al. Sodium terephthalate as an organic anode material for sodium ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 24, 3562–3567 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abouimrane, A. et al. Sodium insertion in carboxylate based materials and their application in 3.6 V full sodium cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9632–9638 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oh, S.-M. et al. Advanced Na[Ni0.25Fe0.5Mn0.25]O2/C–Fe3O4 sodium-ion batteries using EMS electrolyte for energy storage. Nano Lett. 14, 1620–1626 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong, H., Slater, M. D., Balasubramanian, M., Johnson, C. S. & Rajh, T. Amorphous TiO2 nanotube anode for rechargeable sodium ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2560–2565 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, K. T. et al. Anatase titania nanorods as an intercalation anode material for rechargeable sodium batteries. Nano Lett. 14, 416–422 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang, J. P. et al. Electrochemical sodium storage of TiO2(B) nanotubes for sodium ion batteries. RSC Adv 3, 12593–12597 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Augustyn, V. et al. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat. Mater. 12, 518–522 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, Z. et al. High-performance sodium-ion pseudocapacitors based on hierarchically porous nanowire composites. ACS Nano 6, 4319–4327 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu, P. F., Li, C. L. & Guo, X. X. Sodium storage and pseudocapacitive charge in textured Li4Ti5O12 thin films. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 10616–10624 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Raju, V. et al. Superior cathode of sodium-ion batteries: orthorhombic V2O5 nanoparticles generated in nanoporous carbon by ambient hydrolysis deposition. Nano Lett. 14, 4119–4124 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gonzalez, J. R., Alcantara, R., Nacimiento, F., Ortiz, G. F. & Tirado, J. L. Microstructure of the epitaxial film of anatase nanotubes obtained at high voltage and the mechanism of its electrochemical reaction with sodium. CrystEngComm 16, 4602–4609 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, H. S. et al. Mesoporous TiO2-B microspheres with superior rate performance for lithium ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 23, 3450–3454 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, S. H. et al. Nanosheet-constructed porous TiO2-B for advanced lithium ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 24, 3201–3204 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, C. J. et al. Controllable growth of TiO2-B nanosheet arrays on carbon nanotubes as a high-rate anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Carbon N. Y. 69, 302–310 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, C. J. et al. TiO2-B nanosheets/anatase nanocrystals Co-anchored on nanoporous graphene: In situ reduction-hydrolysis synthesis and their superior rate performance as an anode material. Chem. Eur. J 20, 1383–1388 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Breault, T. M. & Bartlett, B. M. Lowering the band gap of anatase-structured TiO2 by coalloying with Nb and N: electronic structure and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue eye. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 5986–5994 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Etacheri, V., Yourey, J. E. & Bartlett, B. M. Chemically bonded TiO2-bronze nanosheet/reduced graphene oxide hybrid for high-power lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 8, 1491–1499 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Arrouvel, C., Parker, S. C. & Islam, M. S. Lithium insertion and transport in the TiO2-B anode material: a computational study. Chem. Mater. 21, 4778–4783 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, L., Zhou, F., Meng, Y. S. & Ceder, G. First-principles study of surface properties of LiFePO4: Surface energy, structure, Wulff shape, and surface redox potential. Phy. Rev. B 76, 165435 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Augustyn, V. et al. Lithium-ion storage properties of titanium oxide nanosheets. Mater. Horiz 1, 219–223 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, J., Polleux, J., Lim, J. & Dunn, B. Pseudocapacitive contributions to electrochemical energy storage in TiO2 (anatase) nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 14925–14931 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ong, S. P. et al. Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3680–3688 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pan, H. L. et al. Sodium storage and transport properties in layered Na2Ti3O7 for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater 3, 1186–1194 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu, L. M., Buchholz, D., Bresser, D., Gomes Chagas, L. & Passerini, S. Anatase TiO2 nanoparticles for high power sodium-ion anodes. J. Power Sources 251, 379–385 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xu, Y. et al. Nanocrystalline anatase TiO2: a new anode material for rechargeable sodium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 49, 8973–8975 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Brutti, S., Gentili, V., Menard, H., Scrosati, B. & Bruce, P. G. TiO2-(B) nanotubes as anodes for lithium batteries: origin and mitigation of irreversible capacity. Adv. Energy Mater 2, 322–327 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cha, H. A., Jeong, H. M. & Kang, J. K. Nitrogen-doped open pore channeled graphene facilitating electrochemical performance of TiO2 nanoparticles as an anode material for sodium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 5182–5186 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang, D. J. et al. An efficient photocatalyst structure: TiO2(B) nanofibers with a shell of anatase nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17885–17893 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lindström, H. et al. Li+ ion insertion in TiO2 (anatase). 2. voltammetry on nanoporous films. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7717–7722 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yildirim, H., Greeley, J. & Sankaranarayanan, S. K. R. S. Effect of concentration on the energetics and dynamics of Li ion transport in anatase and amorphous TiO2 . J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 15661–15673 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hummers, W. S. & Offeman, R. E. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339–1339 (1958).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21271078 and 51472098), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (no. NECT-12-0223), and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (no. IRT1014). We are thankful to the Analytical and Testing Center of HUST for XRD, TG, SEM and TEM measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



C.J.C. and Y.W.W had equal contribution to the article. C.J.C. synthesized the samples, carried out the electrochemical measurements and wrote the article; and Y.W.W performed the DFT calculations and the related analysis. X.L.H raised the idea, designed the experiments, analyzed the data and edited the manuscript. X.L.J. and B.S. provided valuable advices and helped edit the manuscript. M.Y.Y, L.Q.M. and P.H. helped characterize the materials. Y.H.H. helped analyse the results and gave helpful discussions. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xianluo Hu or Yunhui Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-13, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References (PDF 2340 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Wen, Y., Hu, X. et al. Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitance in graphene-coupled titanium oxide enabling ultra-fast sodium storage and long-term cycling. Nat Commun 6, 6929 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing