Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing


Graphene oxide membranes—partially oxidized, stacked sheets of graphene1—can provide ultrathin, high-flux and energy-efficient membranes for precise ionic and molecular sieving in aqueous solution2,3,4,5,6. These materials have shown potential in a variety of applications, including water desalination and purification7,8,9, gas and ion separation10,11,12,13, biosensors14, proton conductors15, lithium-based batteries16 and super-capacitors17. Unlike the pores of carbon nanotube membranes, which have fixed sizes18,19,20, the pores of graphene oxide membranes—that is, the interlayer spacing between graphene oxide sheets (a sheet is a single flake inside the membrane)—are of variable size. Furthermore, it is difficult to reduce the interlayer spacing sufficiently to exclude small ions and to maintain this spacing against the tendency of graphene oxide membranes to swell when immersed in aqueous solution21,22,23,24,25. These challenges hinder the potential ion filtration applications of graphene oxide membranes. Here we demonstrate cationic control of the interlayer spacing of graphene oxide membranes with ångström precision using K+, Na+, Ca2+, Li+ or Mg2+ ions. Moreover, membrane spacings controlled by one type of cation can efficiently and selectively exclude other cations that have larger hydrated volumes. First-principles calculations and ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy reveal that the location of the most stable cation adsorption is where oxide groups and aromatic rings coexist. Previous density functional theory computations show that other cations (Fe2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Cr2+ and Pb2+) should have a much stronger cation–π interaction with the graphene sheet than Na+ has26, suggesting that other ions could be used to produce a wider range of interlayer spacings.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Interlayer spacings in freestanding cation-controlled GOMs.
Figure 2: Solution adsorption of freestanding GOMs with different ions.
Figure 3: Single-ion permeation tests of GOMs supported by ceramic substrates.
Figure 4: Theoretical computations for cations between two graphene oxide sheets.


  1. 1

    Dikin, D. A. et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 448, 457–460 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Joshi, R. K. et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 343, 752–754 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Elimelech, M. & Phillip, W. A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333, 712–717 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Gin, D. L. & Noble, R. D. Designing the next generation of chemical separation membranes. Science 332, 674–676 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Han, Y., Xu, Z. & Gao, C. Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 3693–3700 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Liu, G. P., Jin, W. Q. & Xu, N. P. Graphene-based membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5016–5030 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Sun, P. et al. Selective trans-membrane transport of alkali and alkaline earth cations through graphene oxide membranes based on cation-π interactions. ACS Nano 8, 850–859 (2014)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Surwade, S. P. et al. Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 459–464 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Lin, L. C. & Grossman, J. C. Atomistic understandings of reduced graphene oxide as an ultrathin-film nanoporous membrane for separations. Nat. Commun. 6, 8335 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Celebi, K. et al. Ultimate permeation across atomically thin porous graphene. Science 344, 289–292 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kim, H. W. et al. Selective gas transport through few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes. Science 342, 91–95 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Li, H. et al. Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science 342, 95–98 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Koenig, S. P., Wang, L., Pellegrino, J. & Bunch, J. S. Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 728–732 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Liu, Y. X., Dong, X. C. & Chen, P. Biological and chemical sensors based on graphene materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2283–2307 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Lozada-Hidalgo, M. et al. Sieving hydrogen isotopes through two-dimensional crystals. Science 351, 68–70 (2016)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Yao, F. et al. Diffusion mechanism of lithium ion through basal plane of layered graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8646–8654 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Wang, H. L. et al. Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium-sulfur battery cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability. Nano Lett. 11, 2644–2647 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    De Volder, M. F. L ., Tawfick, S. H ., Baughman, R. H. & Hart, A. J. Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science 339, 535–539 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Koga, K., Gao, G. T., Tanaka, H. & Zeng, X. C. Formation of ordered ice nanotubes inside carbon nanotubes. Nature 412, 802–805 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Liu, J., Shi, G. S., Guo, P., Yang, J. R. & Fang, H. P. Blockage of water flow in carbon nanotubes by ions due to interactions between cations and aromatic rings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 164502 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Huang, H. B. et al. Ultrafast viscous water flow through nanostrand-channelled graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2979 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Goh, K. et al. All-carbon nanoarchitectures as high-performance separation membranes with superior stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 7348–7359 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Hung, W. S. et al. Cross-linking with diamine monomers to prepare composite graphene oxide-framework membranes with varying d-spacing. Chem. Mater. 26, 2983–2990 (2014)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Su, Y. et al. Impermeable barrier films and protective coatings based on reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 5, 4843 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Sun, P., Wang, K. & Zhu, H. Recent developments in graphene-based membranes: structure, mass-transport mechanism and potential applications. Adv. Mater. 28, 2287–2310 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Shi, G. S. et al. Ion enrichment on the hydrophobic carbon-based surface in aqueous salt solutions due to cation-π interactions. Sci. Rep 3, 3436 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Abraham, J. et al. Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 546–550 (2017)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Raidongia, K. & Huang, J. Nanofluidic ion transport through reconstructed layered materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16528–16531 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Shen, J. et al. Membranes with fast and selective gas-transport channels of laminar graphene oxide for efficient CO2 capture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 578–582 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Huang, K. et al. A graphene oxide membrane with highly selective molecular separation of aqueous organic solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 6929–6932 (2014)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Mahadevi, A. S. & Sastry, G. N. Cation-π interaction: its role and relevance in chemistry, biology, and material science. Chem. Rev. 113, 2100–2138 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank P. Ball, L. Kong, J. Liu, Z. Hou, G. Lei and H. Yang for constructive suggestions. We acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 11290164, 41430644, 21490585, 11574339, 11404361 and 21476107), the National Science Fund for Outstanding Young Scholars (number 11722548), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant number KJZD-EW-M03), the Deepcomp7000 and ScGrid of the Supercomputing Center, the Computer Network Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Special Program for Applied Research on SuperComputation of the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund (second phase), the Shanghai Supercomputer Center of China, and the BL16B1 and BL14W1 beamlines at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility.

Author information




H.F. had the idea of controlling the interlayer spacing using ions based on cation–π interactions. H.F., M.W., W.J., J.L. and G.S. designed the experiments and simulations. L.C., G.S., J.S., B.P., G.X., B.Z., Y.W., F.B., J.W., D.L., Z.Q., G.L., J.Z. and L.Z. performed the experiments. G.S., Y.Y. and L.C. performed the simulations. G.S., L.C., H.F., J.L., W.J., M.W., G.X. and G.Z. analysed the data, G.S., L.C., H.F., W.J. and M.W. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Minghong Wu or Wanqin Jin or Jingye Li or Haiping Fang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks R. Karnik and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Information sections PS1-PS12. See Contents page for more details. (PDF 2152 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Shi, G., Shen, J. et al. Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing. Nature 550, 380–383 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.