Cancer research attracts billions of dollars in funding every year from governments, charities and other institutions. This helps to establish the field as a cornerstone of scientific activity in many countries, especially the United States.

Special focus

Cancer research represents a large slice of overall research output in the Nature Index for many institutions, although this does not always translate to a high Share in this field. This is shown in the chart below, which plots Share against the proportion of an institution’s Nature Index output represented by cancer research for the leading 200 institutions in the topic.

Scatter plot showing the leading 200 institutions in cancer research

Source: Nature Index. Data analysis by Bo Wu. Infographic by Simon Baker, Bec Crew and Tanner Maxwell

Some outliers are highlighted in the chart below. Specialist cancer centres unsurprisingly have a high proportion of Nature Index output related to cancer research. But two in the United States, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, are clear of other specialist institutions on Share.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences, in Beijing, has a relatively low proportion of Nature Index output focused on cancer research, but it still has the second highest Share for the period 2018–22.

Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, has the world’s leading Share of cancer research, and more than one-fifth of its total Nature Index output is in this area. The National Institutes of Health, a major funder of cancer research in the United States, also has a high Share. Stanford University in California has a Share of 343, despite just 11% of its overall Nature Index output for the period 2018–22 being related to cancer research.

Scatter plot highlighting out certain institutions among the leading 200 institutions in cancer research

Source: Nature Index. Data analysis by Bo Wu. Infographic by Simon Baker, Bec Crew and Tanner Maxwell

North American giant

With 10,280 grants worth a total of US$13.1 billion awarded in 2018–22, the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) dwarfs all other major North American funders of cancer research. Among the 27 institutes and centres of the US National Institutes of Health, the NCI is the largest, with a federally allocated budget of $7.3 billion for 2023, up $408 million on last year.

Bar chart showing leading funders of cancer research in North America

Source: Dimensions. Data analysis by Bo Wu. Infographic by Simon Baker, Bec Crew and Tanner Maxwell

Europe’s key spenders

The European Commission, which invests in science through the European Union’s ‘Horizon’ funding programmes, allocated almost 1,300 cancer research grants from 2018 to 2022, totalling $2.5 billion, according to Dimensions data. The European Research Council, another beneficiary of Horizon money, funded grants worth around $850 million.

Bar chart showing leading funders of cancer research in Europe

Source: Dimensions. Data analysis by Bo Wu. Infographic by Simon Baker, Bec Crew and Tanner Maxwell

Asia-Pacific spread

The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science allocated the most money for cancer research from 2018 to 2022 among Asia-Pacific funders listed in the Dimensions database. Its 15,665 grants were worth a total of around $860 million. The National Natural Science Foundation of China was close behind, distributing 11,910 grants worth about $810 million.

Bar chart showing leading funders of cancer research in the Asia Pacific region

Source: Dimensions. Data analysis by Bo Wu. Infographic by Simon Baker, Bec Crew and Tanner Maxwell

Lost connections

The United States is a force in international cancer research: it helps form the five leading bilateral country collaborations in the Nature Index for 2018–22. The United States and China had the most prolific partnership by some margin. But a steep decline since 2018, probably reflecting the impact of rising political tensions and the COVID-19 pandemic, has hugely reduced the gap with other US partnerships.

Line graph showing the leading countries’ collaboration with the US by bilateral collaboration score

Source: Nature Index. Data analysis by Bo Wu. Infographic by Simon Baker, Bec Crew and Tanner Maxwell

Prolific partners

The leading five institutional pairs in cancer-related research for 2018–22 are all domestic partnerships. A rapid growth in collaborative articles between the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Sciences since 2016 is the most striking trend.

Line graph showing the leading global collaborating institutions by bilateral collaboration score

Source: Nature Index. Data analysis by Bo Wu. Infographic by Simon Baker, Bec Crew and Tanner Maxwell