Main

In human, intestinal epithelial cells migrate from the base of the crypt to the villi where approximately 1010 cells are shed per day.1, 2 This phenomenon was first described in 1948 and the term ‘extrusion zone’ coined to denote the area on the villus or colonic surface where cells are lost.3, 4 Although cell shedding has been frequently quantified, little is known about the mechanism(s) mediating cell shedding.5, 6, 7, 8

A number of mechanisms for cell shedding have been proposed (for review see Mayhew et al9). In mouse and possibly humans the whole cell is shed and then subsequently undergoes apoptosis (anoikis) as attachments to the basement membrane are loosened.10, 11, 12 In the guinea-pig, apoptotic fragments are pinched off leaving junctional complexes intact. Remarkably nuclei are rarely found in the lumen.13 In reindeer and seals, cell fragments are lost from the villus either by extrusion or phagocytosis by neighboring macrophages. There is also evidence of necrotic cell death at the villus tip in these species with breach of the epithelial monolayer.14 It has also been suggested that apoptosis or anoikis initiates cell shedding although direct evidence is sparse and mice lacking bcl-2, bcl-w or bax have apparently normal villus architecture.15, 16, 17, 18 The mechanism of cell shedding is important because abundant shedding must be achieved without loss of intestinal barrier function. Classically, the epithelial barrier is believed to have two parts. One component is the intrinsic impermeability of the epithelial cell apical membrane. The second is the tight junction between adjacent epithelial cells, which restricts paracellular flux between cells.19, 20 Our own work using in vivo confocal and two-photon microscopy of living intestinal tissue from mice, suggests that there is a third component of the epithelial barrier that may also be important for controlling passive permeability. We observe that an impermeable substance plugs epithelial discontinuities on the villus following cell shedding, resulting in 3% of surface area that have such gaps near the villus tip.12 Studies in human tissue culture models show that recovery from physical wounding involves sequential activation of rho kinase (ROCK) and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) leading to contraction of an actin ring, like a purse string, that closes off the denuded region and restores barrier function.21, 22, 23, 24 As cell loss leaves a defect in the epithelium that ultimately has to be healed, we hypothesize that epithelial gaps caused by cell shedding may be healed by mechanisms similar to those that heal epithelial wounds.

In this study, we have developed and applied a routine method for obtaining human histological sections in which cell shedding can readily observed and characterized. We use the preparation to examine biochemical features of apoptosis and activation of MLCK and found that the gaps left after cell shedding are healed by a mechanism akin to wound healing of cultured epithelial monolayers.

Materials and methods

Subjects

A total of 14417 villus sections were studied from six individuals (aged 24–78 years; two male and four female) who underwent ileal resection for malignancy (three cases), reversal of ileostomy (two cases) and ulcerative colitis (one case). The tissue obtained was at least 5 cm distant to any pathological lesions present. The study had ethical approval (04/Q1505/135 Date: 21 December 2004) and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Tissue Collection and Fixation

Standard surgical resections were undertaken with the exception that vessels supplying the small bowel were ligated last. Resected tissue was taken immediately to the pathology department (longest time <25 min) and carefully placed in either 10% neutral buffered formalin (BIOS Europe Ltd, Skelmersdale, UK) or a mixture of three parts methanol and one part acetic acid for fixation. Following fixation specimens were embedded in paraffin and 4 μm sections taken. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and the number of shedding events counted. We compared a variety of tissue preparation methods for fixation to optimize preservation of cell shedding events (Figure 1). We found that simply slicing bowel across its long axis into 5–10 cm segments before placing in neutral buffered formalin was the best technique (Figure 1a), presumably because this minimized the shear forces at the luminal surface during handling and fixation. Care was always taken to ensure the specimen was completely covered with formalin for 48 h. Pinning the specimen to a corkboard provided the best preservation. However, the number of cells seen in the process of being shed was reduced compared to the other fixation methods tried; presumably due to shear forces removing the shedding cells from the epithelium (Figure 1e). The other methods did not achieve adequate preservation of cell shedding events.

Figure 1
figure 1

Techniques of bowel exposure to fixative to preserve cell shedding events. (a) Bowel placed directly in neutral buffered formalin for 48 h with no intervention. (b) A half-length slit was made in the antimesenteric border of the bowel. (c) A full-length slit was made in the antimesenteric border of the bowel. (d) The bowel was inflation fixed by filling with neutral buffered formalin for 48 h and tying off the ends of the intestinal segment and (e) the bowel was pinned flat to a corkboard and inverted in neutral buffered formalin for 48 h.

Histological Assessment and Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections were stained using standard histological techniques with H&E or a combination of periodic acid Schiff and Alcian Blue (ABPAS).25

For immunohistochemistry, paraffin sections were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol to distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked using 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 12 min, and then sections were washed in deionized water for 5 min. Sections undergoing heat-mediated antigen retrieval were placed in a pressure cooker filled with 10 mM/l EDTA (pH 7.0) and treated at full pressure for 3 min. All sections were stained in a DakoCytomation Autostainer.

Primary antibody was applied for 40 min, then sections were washed and incubated with the DakoCytomation ChemMate EnVision Detection Kit (Catalogue no. K5007, DakoCytomation, Ely, UK). Labelled polymer detection agent was applied for 30 min at room temperature followed by the DAB+ chromogen for 20 min at room temperature. Between each step, sections were washed in Tris-buffered saline. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in graded alcohol followed by xylene and mounted in DPX. Negative controls were performed using antibody diluent in place of an antibody.

The following primary antibodies were used: Rabbit cleaved caspase-3 antibody (dilution 1:200–0.3 μg/ml) (catalogue no. #9661; Cell Signalling Technology, MA, USA);26 Rabbit Zona Occludens-1 antibody (ZO-1) (dilution one in 100–2.5 μg/ml) (catalogue no. 61-7300; Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA); Phosphorylated myosin light chain (MLC) antibody (dilution one in 80–10 μg/ml). This antibody is active solely against phosphorylated MLCs.27 Monoclonal mouse anti-Human CD34 antibody (dilution 1:50–1 μg/ml) (catalogue no. M 7165; DakoCytomation, Ely, UK); Monoclonal mouse anti-Human CD45 antibody (dilution 1:2000–0.16 μg/ml) (catalogue no. M 0701; DakoCytomation, Ely, UK); Monoclonal mouse anti-Human CD68 clone PG-M1antibody (dilution 1:200–0.625 μg/ml) (catalogue no. M 0876; DakoCytomation, Ely, UK).

Double Immunostaining

For immunofluorescent double staining, serial 3 μm paraffin sections were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol to distilled water. Heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed in a pressure cooker filled with 10 mM/l EDTA (pH 7.0) in which sections were treated at full pressure for 3 min. Manual staining was undertaken in a flat-bed incubation tray.

Primary antibodies were applied for 60 min following which sections were washed in TBS and incubated for 60 min with a mixture of two fluorescently labelled secondary antibodies: FITC-labelled horse anti-mouse IgG (dilution 1:50–30 μg/ml) (Catalogue no. Fl-2000; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK), and TRITC-labelled swine anti-rabbit Igs (dilution 1:50–25 μg/ml (Catalogue no. R0156; DakoCytomation, Ely, UK). Sections were washed in TBS and mounted in aqueous mounting medium containing DAPI (Catalogue no. H-1200; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK). Negative controls were performed using antibody diluent in place of antibody.

The following primary antibodies were applied singly and concurrently as a mixture to serial sections: rabbit anticleaved caspase-3 antiserum (dilution 1:50–1.2 μg/ml) (catalogue no. #9661; Cell Signalling Technology, MA, USA): mouse anticleaved cytokeratin 18 antibody, clone M3028 (dilution 1:50–0.66 μg/ml) (Catalogue no. 2140349; Roche Applied Sciences, Penzberg, Germany).

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of categorical data was undertaken by χ2 testing.

Results

When the small intestine was fixed as described in Materials and Methods, cells in the process of being shed could be readily seen and assessed (Figure 2). We found 771 shedding cells from 14 417 villus sections (5.35%) with all stains. Shedding cells were identified and defined as cells with a nucleus oriented beyond the apical membrane boundary of neighboring cells. In shedding cells, the apical membrane appears to be more prominent than its neighbors, and the nuclear chromatin becomes condensed and fragments before falling off into the lumen. The cytoplasm does not obviously fragment but appears to shed largely intact. Beneath the shedding cell there is an area of reduced eosin staining that does not contain a nucleus (Figure 2d and e). These zones appear to be the histological equivalent of the epithelial gaps we have observed by confocal microscopy in the living mouse intestine.12

Figure 2
figure 2

Morphology of small intestinal epithelial cells during the process of shedding. Four examples of cells (a–d) are shown as they progress through the process of shedding. The nuclei become progressively more pyknotic and fragmented as shedding progresses. Eosin staining is reduced beneath the shedding cell in (d) and highlighted green in the line drawing (f). This is extending from the level of neighboring nuclei to the basement membrane. A magnification of image (d) is shown in (e).

We then characterized the cellular environment of the shedding cells. We were able to readily distinguish shedding epithelial cells from intraepithelial lymphocytes by immunostaining against CD45 (leukocyte common antigen) (Figure 3b). There is no evidence that leukocytes cluster around shedding cells. In 27/73 (37%) shedding events there was a leukocyte within one nucleus distance from the estimated site of origin of the shedding cell. Conversely, 48/104 (46%) nonshedding epithelial cells within the monolayer had a leukocyte within the same distance. Staining with ABPAS demonstrated that the material beneath shedding cells is not acid or neutral mucin and can be easily distinguished from goblet cells (Figure 3a). In the guinea-pig, it has been reported that macrophages phagocytose effete cells at the villus tip.13 We find no evidence for such a mechanism in our human samples. CD68 +ve macrophages were observed within a distance of one nucleus of 24/36 (67%) shedding cells and 54/70 (77%) of nonshedding cells (Figure 3c). The signal initiating cell shedding is unknown. It is plausible that shedding may only occur when the epithelial cell passes over a blood vessel where there may be high local concentrations of a signalling substance or that substances inhibitory to shedding diminish as cells become distant to vessels (eg Netrin-1).29 We find little evidence for this as shedding and nonshedding epithelial cells had a similar frequency within a 10 μm radius of a CD34 +ve blood vessel (43/47 (91%) vs 84/92 (91%), respectively) (Figure 3d).

Figure 3
figure 3

Characterization of the environment of epithelial cells during shedding. (a) There is no evidence of mucus (acid/neutral) beneath shedding cells (arrow). Shedding events can be readily distinguished from goblet cells (block arrows). There is no clustering of (a) CD45 +ve leukocytes or (c) CD68 +ve macrophages around shedding cells. (d) Blood vessels identified by the CD34 endothelial marker can sometimes be found near shedding epithelial cells. Arrows indicate shedding cells.

Apoptosis and Cell Shedding

Intestinal villus epithelial cells which have become detached from the basement membrane undergo a phenomenon known as anoikis (detachment-induced apoptosis).30, 31 However, the relationship of anoikis to physiological cell shedding is not known. We investigated whether or not epithelial cells undergo apoptosis before detaching from the epithelial monolayer with only late stage apoptotic bodies being shed. We defined apoptotic cells as those with immunopositive activated caspase-3 throughout the cytoplasm.26 Of 342 cells undergoing shedding only one were negative for activated caspase-3. Cells fragment into apoptotic bodies during shedding with only a few small apoptotic fragments remaining in the epithelial monolayer (Figure 4a and b). It is possible that these retained apoptotic fragments are not derived from epithelial cells but from lymphocytes, fibroblasts or other cells types. Apoptotic bodies from epithelial cells were never seen in the villus epithelium. This is in sharp contrast to the crypt where apoptotic bodies are retained within the epithelial monolayer (Figure 4c).

Figure 4
figure 4

Apoptosis and cell shedding. (a) An apoptotic cell with activated caspase-3 throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus in the process of being shed. Note the base of the cell is above the lower limit of the neighboring nuclei and the majority of caspase-3-positive material is ejected into the intestinal lumen, however, a minority is visible within the lamina propria. (b) A cell (vertical arrow) in the process of being shed from a villus tip and a second (horizontal arrow) with activated caspase-3 that does not appear to be shedding but appears attached to the basement membrane. (c) Human small intestinal crypts from a patient with radiation enteritis. Arrows indicate apoptotic bodies within the epithelial monolayer. (d–g) Images of cell shedding event stained by double immunofluorescence for M30 (green) and cleaved caspase-3 (red). Colocalization of immunostaining for the two antibodies is yellow. (d) Shows a cell in the process of being shed, which contains areas of colocalization of immunostaining for the two antibodies (arrow). (e and f) Low and high power images of the same sections showing an example of cell shedding from the shaft of the villus. The shedding cells are positive for M30 and negative for caspase-3. (g) Shows a caspase-3-postive cell being shed (solid arrow). It neighbor in the monolayer (dotted arrow) is positive for both M30 and caspase-3.

We have observed previously that adjacent epithelial cells are sometimes shed sequentially as sheets (Watson et al12 and data not shown). We were therefore interested to determine whether or not the morphologically normal epithelial cells adjacent to shedding cells contain activated caspase-3. Of the 342 shedding cells, 26 had caspase-3-positive neighbors that were not being shed and were otherwise morphologically normal (Figure 4b). We speculate that these cells were caught directly before initiating cell shedding. It seems likely that initiation of cell shedding and activation of apoptosis pathways occur at approximately the same time.

To distinguish epithelial cells from other cell types we used the M30 monoclonal antibody which detects the Asp396 caspase cleavage site in cytokeratin 18.32 Using double staining immunofluorescence we identified 69 shedding cells. Of these cells, 45 were stained for both caspase-3 and M30 (Figure 4d and g). Of them, 19 shedding cells were positive for M30 but negative for caspase-3 (Figure 4e and f arrows). Conversely, five cells were positive for caspase-3 and negative for M30 (Figure 4g solid arrow). There was no statistical difference in the proportion of cells positive for either caspase-3 or M30. Sometimes shedding cells were observed on the shaft, rather than the tip, of the villus (Figure 4e and f). Overall, these results confirm that epithelial cells are undergoing apoptosis during the process of shedding. However, no firm conclusion can be drawn from these data whether apoptosis precedes or follows the initiation of cell shedding.

ZO-1 and Phosphorylated MLC Localization after Cell Shedding

Tight junctions must be disturbed in order for a cell to be shed. Madara33 has proposed that lamellipodia from neighboring cells extend beneath the shedding cell and form a tight junction, which then rises behind the shedding cell. Alternatively, the epithelial gaps remaining after cell shedding may be healed by mechanisms similar to those that heal oligocellular wounds.22, 24 Here, the actin ring at the apical pole of cells at the edge of the wound contracts like a purse-string contracture. In this model the tight junction remains at the apical pole of cells. We used a monoclonal antibody against ZO-1 to investigate the site of tight junction formation in association with cell shedding. The majority of shedding cells in the human small intestine had ZO-1 activity at the apical pole (41/42) (Figure 5a) as opposed to the basal pole (1/42) (Figure 5b).

Figure 5
figure 5

Localization of ZO-1 immunoreactivity following cell shedding. (a and b) ZO-1 immunoreactivity (arrows) at the apical pole of the epithelium adjacent to a shedding cell. (c and d) ZO-1 reactivity at the base of a gap, which is presumed to have been caused by cell shedding. No examples of ZO-1 immunoreactivity beneath the basal pole of a shedding cell were found.

MLCs become phosphorylated during healing of oligocellular wounds.24 We asked if phosphorylated MLCs could be detected at the edges of gaps left after cell shedding. We used a rabbit polyclonal antibody against phosphorylated MLCs to identify whether this mechanism was involved in cell shedding.27 Over half the small intestinal shedding events studied demonstrated phosphorylated MLC activity (25/46) (Figure 6a–d). This indicates that phosphorylated myosin light-chains are commonly present in neighboring cells during cell shedding and suggests that mechanisms associated with epithelial wound healing participate in intestinal epithelial cell shedding.20, 24

Figure 6
figure 6

MLC phosphorylation occurs at the edge of epithelial cells adjacent to a cell being shed. Four examples are shown (a–d). Bars are 20 μm.

Discussion

There are few studies, if any, in the literature describing the morphology of human epithelial cells during the process of shedding from small intestinal villi. This is an especially striking omission given the high rate of cell renewal along the crypt/villus axis.1 We reasoned that shear forces and delays during the preparation of standard histological sections remove fragile shedding cells. For the present study, we developed a method for rapidly and gently preparing surgical specimens of small intestine for histology. Important factors for the preservation of cell shedding are minimal handling of the specimen, rapid transfer from the operating theater to the pathology laboratory and a minimal warm ischemia time.

During and after cell shedding, eosin-positive material remains in situ from where the cell was shed. In a previous study of mice we have demonstrated that these sites (termed ‘gaps’) contain no cellular material but are filled with a substance that maintains the epithelial barrier.12 The source and composition of this ‘plugging’ substance is unknown. Possibilities include material being secreted by neighboring myofibroblasts or the shedding epithelial cell itself.34, 35, 36 Alternatively, the basement membrane may become infolded or expanded into the gap. In our present study, human epithelial gaps are much less obvious than in our previous confocal microscopy of unfixed living murine intestine. This may be because of shrinkage artefact during fixation, or because gaps are more difficult to identify in fixed sections as eosin stains the material in gaps with approximately the same intensity as cytoplasm, or species differences.

We only counted shedding events from villi that were seen from the side and whose height was twice the width, furthermore greater than 50% of the villus epithelium was visible as a monolayer of cells. Shedding events on villi that did not fulfill these criteria were not included in our analysis. From our observation of 771 shedding cells from 14 417 villus sections (5.35%) we can crudely estimate our observed rate of cell loss to be 27 cells/villus/24 h. Assuming that villi are circular in cross-section with a 40 μm diameter, our 4 μm sections which include both sides of the villus, sample approximately 2 × 4 μm/π40 μm of the surface area of the villus. If we also assume it takes 15 min for a cell to be shed,12 the observed rate of shedding is (771/14 417) × (π40/8) × (24 × 4) h=80 cells per villus per 24 h. Potten has calculated the rate of cell loss from mouse villi to be 1400 cells/villus/24 h.1 We therefore assume that a substantial number of shedding events are not being seen despite our careful fixation methods, or that other methods of cell replacement (eg phagocytosis) are not being detected by our methods. It is important to bear in mind this calculation assumes those cells are shed at a constant rate equally through the length of the small intestine. If there is clustering of shedding events this calculation may significantly underestimate the total shedding rate. Also, we only define a cell as being in the process of shedding if its nucleus oriented beyond the apical membrane boundary of neighboring cells. It is worth noting that in our previous study we found that 3% of cell positions were epithelial gaps. If we assume there are 3500 epithelial cells/villus we can calculate that at any time point there are 105 gaps on the villus. If gaps remain for 1 h before filling in we can calculate there are 105 × 24 h=2500 shedding events/villus/24 h. This is much more in line with the value of Potten of 1400 shedding events/24 h. If we assume gaps exist for 1.8 h before filling in then our calculated shedding rate becomes identical to that measured by Potten. In the present study, we have only counted shedding marked by a cell leaving the epithelial monolayer. It is likely that there are many gaps without a marking shedding cell that we are unable to identify. This may contribute to the low shedding rate we have calculated. If we assume that all caspase-3-positive cells in the monolayer, irrespective of whether they appear to be shedding or not, represent a shedding event we find that 946/865 villus sections contain cleaved caspase-3-positive cells. From this we can calculate shedding rates of 1650 cells are shed per villus per 24 h.

Little is known about the sites along the villus where cells are shed although it is often assumed that all cells are shed from the tip of the villus.5, 6, 7, 8 Reports using pig intestine or chimeric mice demonstrate that the cohort of cells leaving a crypt often becomes discontinuous (patchy) as cells reach the upper half of the villus, strongly suggesting that significant numbers of cells have been lost from the population at lower regions of the villus.37, 38 In our own studies, the great majority of shedding events were seen at the villus tip, although we identified one shedding event unequivocally from the shaft of the villus (Figures 4e and f). It is possible that our fixation techniques do not preserve shedding events along the wall of the villus. This may partially account for the low numbers of cell shedding events seen.

The signals initiating cell shedding are unknown but must be robust and accurate as there appears to a tight coupling of cell loss on the villus to cell division in the crypt. Loss of accurate control of cell shedding would presumably cause serious disruption of the mucosal architecture. We wondered whether cells were shed when they came into close proximity with a blood vessel suggesting a blood borne signal such as Netrin-129 but found no evidence for this. To gain further insight into these mechanisms it is important to know whether the target of signalling is apoptosis or some different specific cell shedding mechanism. Extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules provide a constant survival signal to epithelial cells via β1-integrins, focal adhesion kinase (p125FAK) and protein kinase B/Akt-1 pathways.31, 39 Disruption of ECM/integrin interaction causes apoptosis (sometimes called anoikis30) via the mitochondrial pathway.40 Only 3/330 shedding cells were negative for activated caspase-3. Furthermore, we never observe cells in the late stages of apoptosis (apoptotic bodies) in the villus epithelium, unlike the crypt where apoptotic bodies are retained within the epithelial monolayer (Figure 4c). This suggests that the interval between the initiation of shedding and the initiation of apoptosis is very short and can probably not be resolved by immunohistochemical techniques. However, we note that studies of apoptosis in bcl-2, bax and bcl-w knockout mice have found the morphology of the villus tip to be normal in the strains.17, 18 Thus, if apoptosis is initiating cell shedding, it is by a mechanism independent of these well-known apoptosis molecules.

Our observation that ZO-1 is localized to the apical pole of the immediate neighbors of shedding cells is consistent with our previous observations in living mice where we showed that the site of luminal impermeability is at the apical pole of the epithelium.12 Our observation that 50% of gaps had evidence of phosphorylated MLC at their edge suggests that at least some of the molecular machinery that closes oligocellular wounds in human tissue culture studies is activated.24 Together these observations suggest contraction of the actin ring at the apical pole of neighboring epithelial cells to heal gaps by a ‘purse string’ like mechanism. We speculate that the 50% of gaps that do not have phosphorylated MLC at their edge may be at an early stage of wound healing before MLC becomes phosphorylated. ROCK is known to be phosphorylated before MLCK but is very transient so unlikely to be seen often.24

Our results have implications for intestinal diseases such as Crohn's disease, infective enteritis and graft-versus-host disease where an defective barrier has been implicated in disease pathogenesis.20, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 Traditionally, the epithelial barrier is believed to have two parts.19 One component is the intrinsic impermeability of the epithelial cell apical membrane. The second component is the tight junction between adjacent epithelial cells, which restricts paracellular flux between cells. Both components are subject to regulation, but the tight junction is the logical target when an increase in passive and nonselective flux is required. Regulation of the tight junction complex is a well-established mechanism controlling passive fluxes during sodium and glucose absorption and may be perturbed in inflammatory bowel disease.20, 27, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 We hypothesize that perturbation of the process of cell shedding and the subsequent sealing and healing of resultant gaps in the epithelium may be a pathogenic mechanism. Further studies of cell shedding in Crohn's disease patients are required to investigate these possibilities.