The end of 2005 marks the completion of the second publication year for this editorial team. We thank the contributing authors, editorial team and board, and especially the 233 reviewers who have been of such great assistance to the performance of the journal. Their names are given at the end of this editorial.
The declared scope of the journal has been borne out in its published pages. This journal is devoted to high-quality original research that explores the mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, based on both human and experimental studies. Particular emphasis is given to research that elucidates the structural and molecular pathogenesis of disease. This includes research identifying the mechanisms underlying the morphologic manifestations of disease. We also seek high-quality reports that translate basic research findings into advances in diagnostic methodologies for human disease, and rigorous, full-length reports of technical advances in the investigation of human or experimental disease. The latter may include reports of novel animal models of disease, with detailed phenotypic characterization. Lastly, we publish concise critical reviews in the form of Minireviews, devoted to mechanisms of disease.
These principles are reflected well in the articles drawing the greatest attention from the reading public. Table 1 gives the top 10 articles accessed from the web in the form of HTML or PDF downloads, for publication years 2004–2005. The top article (de Kok et al) is, in fact, a technical report of which are the best ‘control genes’ to use for gene expression studies, and was viewed over 3900 times in 2005 at the time of this writing (January–September). This article is a detailed and rigorous analysis of the reproducibility of gene expression measurements. The second article (Zagzag et al) reveals the role of major histocompatibility complex antigens in invading glioma cells. The third article (Cunningham and Gotlieb) is a minireview on the role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Of the remaining seven articles, one is a minireview on proteomics in pathology research; three are original research exploring a mechanism of invasive behavior in glioblastoma, and injury to the heart and pancreas; and three are also technical reports, on isolation of intrahepatic lymphocytes, detection of Variola virus in archived human tissue, and rapid detection of von Hippel–Lindau gene (VHL) exon deletions.
Table 2 gives the top 10 articles cited in the literature. The cited topics range from intestinal epithelial barrier function, and differentiation of insulin-producing cells from bone marrow stem cells; to molecular studies of cancers of the stomach, colon, kidney, and bladder. There are highly ‘current’ themes, such as stem cells, DNA methylation, analysis of receptors for PDGF and EGF. Interestingly, two technical reports are also among the top 10 cited articles: SELDI mass spectrometry for analysis of serum amyloid variants, and amplification of RNA transcripts using terminal continuation.
We draw several conclusions from these data. First, the high volume of web downloads makes it clear that the scientific world turns to the web for access to the published literature. This underscores the value of electronic subscriptions to the scientific literature (and we are working to ensure that all major academic institutions have an electronic subscription to this journal). Second, published articles addressing molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis are highly read, and this journal addresses the breadth of human and animal carcinogenesis. Third, mechanisms of tissue injury and response are also important, again across the panoply of mammalian tissues. Fourth, technical reports and critical reviews are of high value. The attention given to our technical reports is particular affirmation of our philosophy of publishing full-length papers, with detailed and rigorous reporting of data validating the reported methodology.
In 2005 (volume 85), we have published 129 articles across the broad spectrum of human and animal disease. A total of 41% of the articles were studies of human tissues; 43% were animal studies (ignoring the occasional articles which utilize both human and animal tissues). Technical reports and Minireviews comprise the remaining 16%. Studies of cancer totaled 24%; of noncancer topics 76%. There is a broad distribution across essentially all organ systems, with the brain (10%), gut (16%), and liver (16%) being the most common. The cardiovascular system (9%), hematopoietic and lymphoid system (9%), pancreas (8%), and kidney (5%) comprise a mid-frequency group. We are interested in increasing the number of articles we publish in the categories of breast, prostate, and endocrine other than pancreas diabetes, as these are under-represented in our pages (3, 4, and 3%, respectively). We welcome articles from these and other ‘tissue’ areas (eg, bone and soft tissue, skin, head-and-neck, gynecologic), but recognize that there are excellent subspecialty journals in these areas. Overall, these publication numbers reflect both the broad distribution of submitted articles, and the high quality of submitted articles in each potential category. The journal does not ‘pitch’ to one area of emphasis, as expert reviewers appropriate to each topic category are selected for external review.
Each month, we have highlighted articles of clear general interest to our readership. ‘Inside Lab Invest’ is a monthly editorial feature that gives background and comment on three to five articles per issue; the highlighted articles are featured each month on the home webpage for Lab Invest. ‘Inside Lab Invest’ also is published in the back pages of our sister journal, Modern Pathology. These editorial commentaries are intended to give context and perspective on articles in our pages; they also serve as an entry point for web access to our featured articles. We also now have opportunity to upload over half of our published articles to the main Nature Publishing Group web-environment, through the topical links found on the main web page (www.nature.com). Thus, authors publishing in Laboratory Investigation have substantive and multiple opportunities for ‘featured’ treatment of their work.
For volumes 84 and 85 (2004–2005), we have published ‘Pathology Elsewhere’, which seeks to identify recent key publications of relevance to articles published in the same issue of Lab Invest. In the coming year (2006, volume 86), this feature will be replaced by a ‘Pathology Forum’, in which single issues in the pathogenesis of disease will be examined by an expert editorial panel. At this time, I want to extend my thanks to the editorial team that has brought ‘Pathology Elsewhere’ to our pages for 2004–2005: Swan Thung, MD, Section Editor; and Sunil Badve, Maria Isabel Fiel, Maria Guido, Shabnam Jaffer, Gabriel S Levi, Raffaella Morotti, Romil Saxena, Arief Suriwanata, Guoxia Tong, Lawrence Tsao, and Ruliang Xu, Contributing Editors.
The journal has a strong commitment to providing timely and expert review of papers from submitting authors. Our acceptance rate was 26% in 2004, and 20% in 2005. Submissions are continuing at the same rate as in 2004 (615 new submissions), with our being on target for approximately the same as in 2005. Submitted manuscripts are subjected to rigorous editorial evaluation to determine appropriateness for the journal and to assign an initial scientific priority, drawing upon the diverse scientific expertise of our Executive Editorial Group, with consultation from Editorial Board members as needed. For papers published in 2005, approximately 39% of manuscripts passed this initial review and underwent external peer-review evaluation. For those manuscripts that were not felt to be appropriate for the journal on initial editorial assessment (61%), authors were informed of the ‘reject’ within 5 days; not uncommonly, this information was given within 24 h. We feel that such rapid review is only fair, as it enables the authors maximum opportunity to seek publication elsewhere with negligible delay. For manuscripts undergoing full external review, a decision was almost always rendered within 30 days, with ‘in-house’ editorial processing time representing 5–7 of those days. For manuscripts that were rejected with opportunity to resubmit, there was a 90% likelihood that the manuscript would ultimately be published in Lab Invest. Decision time on the resubmitted paper was usually less than 5 days. Lastly, accepted articles were published on-line usually within 5 weeks, and hardcopy within 16 weeks.
Taken together, our overall ‘turnaround time’ for reaching an initial decision on submitted papers averages 8 calendar days. Our data also indicate that a successful article can go from initial submission, through review and revision, and move to electronic publication on the web with a minimum of delay – 73 days on average (not including the authors’ revision time) from initial submission to date of on-line publication, and 112 days until hardcopy publication. This high performance is made possible by the strong commitment of the editorial team, the consistent and outstanding timeliness of our outside expert reviewers, the efficiency of the production team at Nature Publishing Group, and the superb web-based platform upon which this journal runs. We consider this level of performance an absolute requisite for serving authors who choose to submit their manuscripts to this journal.
A comment on the journal ‘Impact Factor’ is in order. In the 1999–2003 time frame, this journal has resided in the vicinity of ‘4’, with a range of 3.934–4.530. Laboratory Investigation has thus routinely ranked third among the general Pathology journals, behind the American Journal of Pathology and the Journal of Pathology. The journal slipped a bit to an Impact Factor of 3.702 for 2004 (issued in July, 2005; reflecting 2004 citations of articles published in 2002–2003), placing us sixth among the 64 ‘Pathology’ journals. We consider that this reflects in part the editorial transition at the end of 2003, as effort was made at the previous editorial office to bring to completion processing and publication of manuscripts in their office, with ‘back-loading’ of the journal pages at the end of 2003. This gives less time for published articles to be cited in the measured time interval, in this case January–December 2004.
We have been tracking both ‘Impact Factor’ and the ‘Immediacy Index’ (articles cited in the same year as their publication) for articles published in this journal since the start of our editorship (2004). The 2004 ‘Immediacy Index’ for this journal was 0.748, third behind J Pathol (1.044) and Am J Pathol (0.957; excluding high self-citation journals). The ‘Immediacy Index’ reveals which journals are currently publishing the ‘hottest’ papers, and may be a good indicator of future ‘Impact Factor’ performance. Our calculated 2005 ‘Impact Factor’ is tracking well, with every indication that it will approach or exceed 4.5 when finally issued in June 2006. At the current time, our 2005 ‘Impact Factor’ is tracking third to J Pathol and Am J Pathol among the general Pathology journals. It should also be noted that Laboratory Investigation ranks second among all pathology journals for total citations in the literature (11 048), clearly marking this as a major journal in the biomedical literature. We thus consider that Laboratory Investigation is in a strong competitive position as we move into 2006.
In closing, we call attention to a recent discussion in this journal of the value of the ‘Pathology’ literature.1 Note was made that much ‘pathology’ research finds its way into the highest impact general medical research journals, and especially into higher impact ‘specialty’ journals (devoted either to organ systems or specific diseases). With our fellow ‘General Pathology’ journal editors, we hope that the best in pathology research can be published within the pages of pathology-oriented journals. We hold to the view that there is ample opportunity for growth and visibility of the several pathology journals, not at the expense of one another, but rather to the benefit of all investigators pursuing research into disease pathobiology.
Reference
1 Crawford JM, Tykocinski ML. Pathology as the enabler of human research. Lab Invest 2005;85:1058–1064.
List of Reviewers for 2005
Abraham, Clara
Abreu, Maria
Ahmed, Asif
Alcaraz, Maria
Alpini, Gianfranco
Anders, Robert
Apostolopoulos, Vasso
Asa, Sylvia
Baldwin, Don
Barclay, Wendy
Barr, Frederic
Barrett, Kim
Bellon, Georges H
Biedermann, Barbara
Bindokas, Vytas
Bockman, Dale
Brat, Daniel
Broude, Natalia E
Buckley, Christopher D
Buxbaum, Joel
Buxton, Denis B
Campbell-Thompson, Martha
Carroll, Steven
Chakrabarty, Subhas
Chan, Edward K
Chan, Lawrence
Chapman, William
Chen, Ching Shih
Cheng, Jason
Cibas, Edmund
Clark, Stephen
Clawson, Gary
Cohen, Samuel
Coisne, Caroline
Corless, Christopher
Costa, Jose
Crawford, James
Cruickshank, Sheena
Czerniak, Bogdan
Dalakas, Marinos
Damjanov, Ivan
Dammann, Reinhard
Davidson, Ben
Dudek, Steven
Duyster, Justus
Dwinell, Michael
Eberhart, Charles
Edelberg, Jay
Fan, Jianglin
Farquhar, Marilyn
Farrell, William
Fink, Mitchell
Frank, Karen
Fu, Kai
Fujii, Yoshitaka
Galli, Stephen
Gallick, Gary
Garvin, A Julian
Gavrilova, Oksana
Gebhart, Erich
Geijtenbeek, Teunis BH
Gershwin, M Eric
Glickman, Jonathan
Goldenring, Jim
Gorham, James
Gotlieb, Avrum
Gottardi, Cara
Gown, Allen
Gratchev, Alexei
Greenberg, Miriam L
Greiner, Dale
Griffin, Sian
Gutmann, David
Hanson, Mark A
Hatch, Grant M
He, Tong-Chuan
Heffelfinger, Sue
Hohlfeld, Reinhard
Holmbeck, Kenn
Iruela-Arispe, Luisa
Isaacs, John
Jennette, J Charles
Kaneto, Hideaki
Kanwar, Yashpal
Keely, Stephen
Klemke, Richard L
Komuro, Issei
Krause, Diane
Kroll, Todd
Ku, H Teresa
Kumar, Shant
Kuwano, Kazuyoshi
Ladanyi, Marc
Lasota, Jerzy
Lax, Sigurd
Lencer, Wayne
Lewis, William
Li, Allen
Liew, Choong-Chin
Lim, Megan
Lin, Sue-Hwa
Lingen, Mark
Liu, Chen
Liu, Fei-Fei
Lizardi, Paul
Lloyd, Ricardo
Loike, John D
Luis, José
LuValle, Phyllis A
Martinez-Hernandez, Antonio
Mavier, Phillippe
May, W Stratford
McAnulty, Robin
McCormick, Beth
McCulloch, Christopher
McIndoe, Richard
McKinnon, Peter
McLean, Gordon W
McManus, Bruce
Merchant, Juanita
Meredith, Stephen
Merlin, Didier
Metcalfe, Dean D
Michalopoulos, George
Michiels, Carine
Milosevic, Michael
Mir, Kalim
Mischel, Paul
Mobasheri, Ali
Moldawer, Lyle
Möller, Peter
Montag, Anthony
Morris, Cindy
Murphy, George
Muyldermans, Serge
Nicosia, Roberto
Nose, Kiyoshi
Notterpek Fletcher, Lucia
Nowak, Greg
Oh, S Paul
Oka, Max
Opavsky, Anne
Pachter, Joel
Padanilam, Babu
Pagano, Claudio
Pang, Linhua
Papadaki, Helen
Paulus, Werner
Pawelec, Graham
Perry, Arie
Petersen, Bryon
Pfeifer, Gerd
Piao, Zhe
Pittenger, Mark
Podolsky, Robert
Polverini, Peter
Prystowsky, Michael
Rahman, Proton
Ramadori, Giuliano
Ramos, Daniel M
Ramphal, Reuben
Reddy, Janardan
Reedquist, Kris
Reidy, Michael
Reinach, Peter S
Reinecker, Hans-Christian
Resnick, Murray
Rimm, David
Rippe, Richard
Rogaeva, Ekaterina
Ryter, Stefan
Saade, George
Sadikot, Ruxana
Salmi, Marko
Samson, Willis K
Saraiva, Maria João
Satoh, Minoru
Satoskar, Abhay
Saubermann, Lawrence
Sawabu, Norio
Schnitt, Stuart
Sestak, Karol
Shah, Bukhtiar H
Shirwan, Haval
Soejima, Kenji
Sporn, Michael
Srivastava, Rakesh
Sternberg, David W
Stout, Robert D
Strazzabosco, Mario
Sudbø, Jon
Surh, Young-Joon
Szabo, Csaba
Tache, Yvette
Tari, Ana
Tartakoff, Alan
Taxy, Jerome
Thiede, Christian
Thomas, Douglas
Thorn, Mari
Tornillo, Luigi
Tryggvason, Karl
Tsao, Sai Wah
Tuan, Rocky S
Tuan, Tai-Lan
Van de Vijver, Marc
Van Gilst, Wiek
Vander Heide, Richard
Vandesompele, Jo
Vaux, David
Verin, Alexander
Wang, Jian-Ying
Wang, Kevin
Wang, Nancy
Wang, Rennian
Wang, Timothy
Wang, Xing-Peng
Watson, Susan
Wen, Tom
Wilson, Jeremy
Witztum, Joseph
Woo, Y Joseph
Wysocki, Lawrence
Xuan, Jim W
Yang, Lijun
Yauch, Robert
Yeh, I-Tien
Yoder, Brian
Young, Leonie
Zatloukal, Kurt
Zhang, Jun
Zhang, You-Qing
Zucman-Rossi, Jessica
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crawford, J. Editorial. Lab Invest 86, 4–8 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700370
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700370
This article is cited by
-
Bringing Pathobiology into Focus
Laboratory Investigation (2006)