Abstract
We performed ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of the C2c and Cmca-12 phases of hydrogen at pressures from 210 to 350 GPa. These phases were predicted to be stable at 0 K and pressures above 200 GPa. However, systematic studies of temperature impact on properties of these phases have not been performed so far. Filling this gap, we observed that on temperature increase diffusion sets in the Cmca-12 phase, being absent in C2c. We explored the mechanism of diffusion and computed melting curve of hydrogen at extreme pressures. The results suggest that the recent experiments claiming conductive hydrogen at the pressure around 260 GPa and ambient temperature might be explained by the diffusion. The diffusion might also be the reason for the difference in Raman spectra obtained in recent experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Being the lightest and the most abundant element in the universe, hydrogen is a fascinating substance. The metallization of dense hydrogen has been one of the central topics since the first theoretical prediction of transition to a monatomic metallic state of molecular hydrogen at 25 GPa by Wigner and Huntington in 19351. Since then a series of theoretical and experimental studies have been employed but could not completely unveil the structural and electronic properties of hydrogen at high pressures2. Solid hydrogen remains an electrical insulator3,4 up to the pressure of 342 GPa at temperatures below 100 K. In Ref. 3, hydrogen was observed as a non-metallic up to 320 GPa at 77 K. Metallic monatomic hydrogen has been predicted5 to exist in the liquid phase at high temperature and pressure. It has been reported that the hydrogen remains molecular up to 285 GPa at T<140 K6,7. Pickard and Needs8 presented the zero temperature phase diagram of solid hydrogen up to ≈400 GPa, predicting the most stable phases remained to be insulating up to 400 GPa.
Recently9 the metallization of hydrogen at ambient temperature and pressures in the range 260–270 GPa was reported, suggesting the further detailed and comprehensive studies of this element. Other studies suggested that hydrogen remain insulating10 at the very same conditions and suggested11 that the experimental data was contaminated due to certain shortcomings of the experimental technique. In such situation theory becomes a useful tool allowing to look at the phenomena possibly causing the disagreement between these observations.
To the best of our knowledge, the x-ray determination of the high pressure structures of solid hydrogen could not be performed by the experiments due to the extremely weak x-ray scattering of hydrogen. Only the experimental findings through Raman and visible transmission spectroscopy10 are available in the literature. Also, there is a number of theoretical papers that render other phases stable at high-PT12,13,14,15,16. The main purpose of the present work, however, is to study the impact of temperature on the structures predicted to be stable at relevant P and zero temperature. Therefore, we have chosen to investigate the C2c and Cmca-12 phases, relevant to the range of pressures in recent experiments. These phases were found stable above 200 GPa by Pickard and Needs8. Since the impact of temperature is expected to be critical (no metallization according to Loubeyre et al.3 at 77 K and metallization according to Eremets and Troyan9 at 300 K), we employed molecular dynamics (MD) method that allows to account for temperature impact.
Results
We found that the impact of temperature is critical. Hydrogen atoms abruptly become diffusing before melting on temperature increase. Intramolecular bonding becomes rather weak at high pressure17 that explains easy pairing-depairing process18. This might explain the difference between the Loubeyre et al.3 and Eremets and Troyan9 experiments. The apparent contradiction between the metallization and no-metallization experiments could be explained by the evacuation of the hydrogen from the experimental cell in experiments by Eremets and Troyan9 due to a sudden onset of diffusion on the C2c to Cmca-12 transition.
We note that Howie et al.10 did not measure conductivity therefore there is no direct controversy between their and Eremets and Troyan9 experiments. While the claim for metallic hydrogen might be unjustified as argued in Ref. 11, we demonstrate that there is the mechanism that might lead to the drop in resistance at ambient temperature and high pressure. Also, the drop in resistance might be anisotropic.
Hydrogen melts at a much higher temperatures than the ambient temperature in the Eremets and Troyan experiment. The hydrogen melting curve bends down but not fast enough to become liquid at 260 GPa. Our hydrogen melting points at 652 K and 261 GPa and 567 K and 288 GPa are in good agreement with the melting curve depicted in Fig. 1 of Ref. 10 and the melting point very recently calculated by Liu et al.13. The diffusive state might be an intermediate between the Cmca-12 and the Ibam structure10 and/or Cmca-4 structure13. It is possible that these structures have actually formed in our MD simulations (Fig. 2).
Discussion
We performed MD simulations (see Methods) for the constant volume starting with the C2c and Cmca-12 (12 atoms in a primitive unit cell) structures. The cell parameters were obtained from relaxation calculations at pressures of 210 GPa, 260 GPa, 305 GPa and 350 GPa, respectively. Then for a number of temperatures we performed MD runs. For each isochore melting point was computed by the Z method19. The computed 4 points are shown in Fig. 1 along with the Z-shaped isochores. Pressure drops on melting, indicating negative volume of melting in accordance with previous studies. Our melting curve, computed at 200 <P<350 GPa, compares well with available data in literature. In Fig. 1, we have shown our P-T computed points, where the sharp P changes at 852 K, 652 K, 567 K and 482 K, for C2c and Cmca-12 phases, representing the melting transitions at these temperatures.
Fig. 3 shows mean square displacement for these phases at a number of temperatures as a function of time. In Fig. 3a, we could not see any diffusion for C2c phase and the melting transition occurs at T = 852 K, whereas in Fig. 3b, the significant diffusion can be observed at T = 490 K for Cmca-12 phase. Note that at T > 490 K, the simulated solid state is metastable, because the hydrogen melts at 652 K (see Fig. 3b). The same trend can also be seen for Cmca-12 phases at 305 GPa and 350 GPa (Fig. 3c and 3d respectively, where the diffusion can be seen at T = 501 K and T = 429 K respectively and the melting occurs at T = 567 K and T = 482 K respectively).
Conductive hydrogen was claimed to be observed at 260 GPa. Let us take a closer look at the data for this pressure.
Calculated radial distribution functions for Cmca-12 structure at 260 GPa, at a number of temperatures are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. One can see that the distance between the central hydrogen atom and the atoms in the first neighbour shell is very short (≈1.2 Å). This suggests that at elevated temperature the atoms that belong to different molecules might come closer to each other than to the atoms in their 'native' molecule. That might lead to exchange of the atoms and, thus, to hydrogen diffusion in solid molecular hydrogen. Indeed, on the T increase we observe that the first (molecular) peak of RDF and the second (1st neighbour) peak start overlap (Fig. 4). When the diffusion sets in, the RDF becomes considerable (non-zero) at the distances intermediate between the intramolecular peak at 0.72 Å and intermolecular peak at 1.2 Å (it forms a shoulder rather than a peak at high T; it can be seen as a peak at low T (Fig. 5). This overlap becomes pronounced at temperatures between 400 K and 500 K. We closely monitored the mobility of hydrogen atoms and we observed that at around 490 K the hydrogen atoms depair18 and create new pairs, facilitating, in this way, diffusion of H atoms. Fig. 3b shows mean square displacement for Cmca-12 phase at 260 GPa, at a number of temperatures as a function of time.
Clearly, there is no diffusion below 490 K. One can see that at all temperatures before onset of melting the hydrogen preserves a layered structure (Fig. 2). The melting was computed by the Z method19 that was recently demonstrated to perform well for molecular crystals20. The melting occurs at 652 K (see inset in Fig. 4) with negative volume change. This suggests that the melting curve of hydrogen has a maximum proposed earlier, however the temperature is still high enough to rule out the Eremets and Troyan9 explanation of metallization by melting transition. The layered structure of hydrogen suggests that diffusion proceeds through layers. Fig. 2 shows the trajectories of hydrogen atoms in the central layer. We see (Fig. 2) that there is no diffusion up to about 490 K. The atoms are moving with considerable amplitude, yet they stay bonded with the same atom through the whole simulation time. At about 490 K the picture is completely different. The continuous bands or, rather, diffusion channels are formed. The diffusion clearly stays within layers. There is no diffusion along 100 and 010 even at much higher temperature of 657 K.
Thus we observe a temperature induced transition from non-diffusive to the diffusive state in solid molecular hydrogen. In our MD simulations we could not consider zero point motion (ZPM) that is considerable at these pressures. Indeed, the vibron frequency of 4000 cm−1 implies the amplitude of ZPM is equal to 0.16 Å. This is equivalent to the amplitude of thermal motion of 200 K (Fig. 4). Therefore, the cumulative impact of thermal and zero point motion might cause the diffusion at already 300 K.
Note, that for deuterium to become diffusive the temperature needs to be higher than for hydrogen. First, the ZPM amplitude for D is smaller (0.1 Å). Second, the amplitude of thermal motion is also smaller at the same temperature. Therefore, exchange of D atoms might require temperatures of 400 K and higher, unlike for H where 300 K seem to be sufficient.
We analyzed the charge that diffusing H atom can carry (Fig. 6). By performing Bader analysis21,22, we computed charges on H atoms at a number of temperatures (Fig. 6). One can see that below the diffusion threshold the charge is close to 1 e., interesting that the charge distribution is asymmetric as predicted by Baranowski23. The charge distribution becomes much wider in diffusing state and similar to the distribution in the liquid state. Considering that the liquid monatomic state is metallic it is possible that the diffusing state is also conductive. Also, considering that in these experiments hydrogen might recrystallize and that the diffusion proceeds along the 001 direction, different experiments might lead to different observations due to the different grains orientation. The bandgap in our simulations is closing but it is known that DFT normally underestimates bandgaps24,25.
If we extrapolate our melting curve (Fig. 1), we find the melting points at around 460 GPa at T = 300 K and 540 GPa at T = 0 K. Given that the liquid hydrogen is non-molecular and metallic, this provides us with the upper limit for the onset of metallicity in hydrogen. This is, of course, if other solid-solid transitions will not significantly increase the hydrogen melting temperature.
Methods
We have performed our ab initio molecular dynamics (MD) calculations with the use of Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) method26, as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) code24,25. The Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE)27 variant of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used for the exchange correlation functional. The Gaussian smearing method with a 0.05 eV smearing width was used for the Brillouin zone integration. We have employed 3 × 3 × 2 k-points mesh to sample the Brillouin zone. The energy cutoff was equal to 520 eV. These values were found sufficient to produce converging results. The Verlet algorithm is used to integrate the equation of motion, with a time step of 0.25 fs (1 fs = 10−15 s). The duration of each MD run was 10000 time steps. Calculation of intermediate averages showed that this is enough to obtain converging averages (see Fig. 1 and inset in Fig. 4). The initial configuration in every run was fully optimized for C2c and Cmca-12 structures8 with 216 hydrogen atoms. We have performed a series of simulations in the microcanonical ensemble, with a constant volumes, like 1.5408 Å3/atom (P = 259 GPa at T = 0 K) for one of the studied Cmca-12 structure at 260 GPa, varying initial temperatures19. From these simulations, the corresponding melting curve of hydrogen, mean square displacements (MSD's), radial distribution functions (RDF's), trajectories, pressures and temperatures were derived and analyzed.
References
Wigner, E. & Huntington, H. B. On the possibility of a metallic modification of hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 3, 764–770 (1935).
Mao, H. K. & Hemley, R. J. Ultrahigh pressure transitions in solid hydrogen. Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 671–692 (1994).
Loubeyre, P., Occelli, F. & LeToullec, R. Optical studies of solid hydrogen to 320 GPa and evidence for black hydrogen. Nature 416, 613–617 (2002).
Narayana, C., Luo, H., Orloff, J. & Ruoff, A. L. Solid hydrogen at 342 GPa: no evidence for an alkali metal. Nature 393, 46–49 (1998).
Bonev, S. A., Schwegler, E., Ogitsu, T. & Galli, G. A quantum fluid of metallic hydrogen suggested by first-principles calculations. Nature 431, 669–672 (2004).
Tse, J. S. & Klug, D. D. Evidence from molecular dynamics simulations for non-metallic behavior of solid hydrogen above 160 GPa. Nature 378, 595–597 (1995).
Goncharov, A. F., Gregoryanz, E., Hemley, R. J. & Mao, H.-K. Spectroscopic studies of the vibrational and electronic properties of solid hydrogen to 285 GPa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14234–14237 (2001).
Pickard, C. J. & Needs, R. J. Structure of phase III of solid hydrogen. Nature Physics 3, 473–476 (2007).
Eremets, M. I. & Troyan, I. A. Conductive dense hydrogen. Nature Materials 10, 927 (2011).
Howie, R. T., Guillaume, C. L., Scheler, T., Goncharov, A. F. & Gregoryanz, E. Mixed molecular and atomic phase of dense hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 125501, 2012.
Nellis, W. J., Ruoff, A. L. & Silvera, I. F. Has Metallic Hydrogen Been Made in a Diamond Anvil Cell?. arXiv: 1201.0407.
Johnson, K. A. & Ashcroft, N. W. Structure and bandgap closure in dense hydrogen. Nature 403, 632–635 (2000).
Liu, H., Zhu, L., Cui, W. & Ma, Y. Room-temperature structures of solid hydrogen at high pressures. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 074501 (2012).
Pickard, C. J., Martinez-Canales, M. & Needs, R. J. Density functional theory study of phase IV of solid hydrogen. Phys. Rev. B 85, 214114 (2012).
Liu, H., Wang, H. & Ma, Y. Quasi-Molecular and Atomic Phases of Dense Solid Hydrogen. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 9221–9226 (2012).
Liu, H. & Ma, Y. Proton or Deuteron Transfer in Phase IV of Solid Hydrogen and Deuterium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 025903 (2013).
Hemley, R. J., Soos, Z. G., Hanfland, M. & Mao, H.-K. Charge-transfer states in dense hydrogen. Nature 369, 384–387 (1994).
Ashcroft, N. W. Pairing instabilities in dense hydrogen. Phys. Rev. B 41, 10963–10971 (1990).
Belonoshko, A. B., Skorodumova, N. V., Rosengren, A. & Johansson, B. Melting and critical superheating. Phys. Rev. B 73, 012201 (2006).
Finney, A. R. & Rodger, P. M. Applying the Z method to estimate temperatures of melting in structure II clathrate hydrates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 44, 19979–19987 (2011).
Bader, R. Atoms in molecules: A quantum theory. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1990.
Henkelman, G., Arnaldson, A. & Jonsson, H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comp. Mat. Sci. 36, 354–360 (2006).
Baranowski, B. Charge transfer in hydrogen. Physica B 16, 265 (1999).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Diatschenko, V. et al. Melting curves of molecular hydrogen and molecular deuterium under high pressures between 20 and 373 K. Phys. Rev. B 32, 381–389 (1985).
Datchi, F., Loubeyre, P. & LeToullec, R. Extended and accurate determination of the melting curves of argon, helium, ice (H2O) and hydrogen (H2). Phys. Rev. B 61, 6535 (2000).
Gregoryanz, E., Goncharov, A. F., Matsuishi, K., Mao, H.-K. & Hemley, R. J. Raman spectroscopy of hot dense hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 175701 (2003).
Deemyad, S. & Silvera, I. F. Melting line of hydrogen at high Pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 155701 (2008).
Eremets, M. I. & Trojan, I. A. Evidence of maximum in the melting curve of hydrogen at megabar pressures. Pis'ma v Zh. Èksper. Teoret. Fiz., 89:4, 198–203 (2009).
Acknowledgements
Calculations have been done using resources of the Swedish National Supercomputer Center (NSC) in Linköping. The study was supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR). M.R. acknowledges support from Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan. H.K. Mao was supported as part of EFree, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number DE-SC0001057.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.A. designed research; M.R. performed research; A.B.B., M.R., H.-K.M. and R.A. analyzed data; and A.B.B., M.R., H.-k.M. and R.A. wrote the paper.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Belonoshko, A., Ramzan, M., Mao, Hk. et al. Atomic Diffusion in Solid Molecular Hydrogen. Sci Rep 3, 2340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02340
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02340
This article is cited by
-
Predicted reentrant melting of dense hydrogen at ultra-high pressures
Scientific Reports (2016)
-
Nuclear quantum dynamics in dense hydrogen
Scientific Reports (2014)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.