Comment

Filter By:

Article Type
  • G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with no known endogenous ligand are termed orphans. Deorphanization of a GPCR involves identifying the ligand, which can be a painstaking exercise. In this Comment, we discuss the challenges in the process, its role in drug discovery and alternative approaches to characterizing orphan GPCRs.

    • Nicola J. Smith
    • Fiona Murray
    Comment
  • The identification of sodium and potassium currents as underlying action potential propagation, more than 70 years ago, opened a new avenue of research into the role of ion channels. In this Comment, we present our personal perspectives of the field, from the identification of Shaker as a potential potassium channel to the mechanistic insights available to us today.

    • Lily Yeh Jan
    • Yuh Nung Jan
    Comment
  • Over the past 30 years, the field of structural biology and its associated biological insights have seen amazing progress. In this Comment, I recount several milestones in the field and how we can apply lessons from the past toward an exciting future, especially as it relates to drug discovery.

    • Cheryl H. Arrowsmith
    Comment
  • In addition to its role in proteasomal degradation, ubiquitin has multiple roles in autophagy. It can mark proteins for autophagic degradation and actively drive autophagosome formation. Recent work shows that ubiquitin can also be conjugated to phospholipids and other biomolecules.

    • Noboru Mizushima
    Comment
  • Ubiquitination is an essential process that curtails cellular levels of damaged and redundant proteins. Chemical biologists have harnessed this natural system to induce the degradation of disease-relevant proteins. We reflect here on the potential of ‘degraders’ for targeted selectivity, and discuss the role of computer-aided drug design in shaping future advances.

    • Rory Whelan
    • Cristina Mayor-Ruiz
    Comment
  • The modification of proteins with the small protein ubiquitin constitutes a Daedalian system of posttranslational modifications in every eukaryotic cell, which is often referred to as the ubiquitin code1. Here we consider the scale and complexity of the ubiquitin system in light of recent developments.

    • Bernhard C. Lechtenberg
    • David Komander
    Comment
  • Collaboration is key to modern science, with major advances using multiple complementary approaches and dependent on sophisticated infrastructure. Yet science is also highly personal, as each person carves out a reputation and career. How does this work out in reality, and how can communities be built to benefit science and scientists?

    • Martyn David Winn
    Comment
  • Here we investigate the role of epigenetics in the formation, transcription regulation, maintenance and termination of several non-canonical chromatin structures. Using two examples, we demonstrate how studying non-canonical structures may reveal underlying mechanisms with implications for disease and propose intriguing epigenetic avenues for further exploration.

    • Albert S. Agustinus
    • Yael David
    Comment
  • The concluding statement of Watson and Crick’s historic paper on the structure of DNA1 enshrines a key tenet of molecular mechanistic cell biology: “… the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material”. Function — heredity in this case — is embedded in the redundant sequence information of the two strands of DNA. Although not always expressed as blatantly, the intimate dependence of cellular function on the mechanical level of macromolecules is inspirational. The devil is in the structural detail, and the painstaking quest for the correct details and their returns in the form of reliable knowledge knows no shortcuts.

    • Andrea Musacchio
    Comment
  • DNA polymerase θ (POLQ) repairs mitotic DNA breaks; this requires RHINO and PLK1, averts genomic instability and may underlie effects of POLQ inhibitors in HDR-deficient cancer cells. We discuss recent work on mitotic DNA break processing and repair, the need for multiple DSB repair pathways and implications of therapeutic POLQ targeting in cancer.

    • Marcel A. T. M. van Vugt
    • Marcel Tijsterman
    Comment
  • Structural biology plays a crucial role in the fight against COVID-19, permitting us to ‘see’ and understand SARS-CoV-2. However, the macromolecular structures of SARS-CoV-2 proteins that were solved with great speed and urgency can contain errors that may hinder drug design. The Coronavirus Structural Task Force has been working behind the scenes to evaluate and improve these structures, making the results freely available at https://insidecorona.net/.

    • Tristan I. Croll
    • Kay Diederichs
    • Andrea Thorn
    Comment
  • Artistic techniques are essential tools to visualize, understand and disseminate the results of scientific research. The field of structural biology has enjoyed a particularly productive marriage of art and science.

    • David S. Goodsell
    Comment
  • The Protein Data Bank (PDB) is a community resource. But how do we define community, and how has it changed over the last 50 years since the PDB was founded? How did the community influence the evolution of the PDB, and how did the PDB influence both the science and the behavior of the community?

    • Helen M. Berman
    Comment
  • A symposium to remember the life of Raj Rajashankar and to highlight the many scientific achievements to which he contributed was also an occasion to reflect on the fundamental role of personal interactions in the research enterprise.

    • Filippo Mancia
    • Stephen C. Harrison
    Comment
  • Misregulation of gene cohorts, which is caused by aberrant chromatin features and is observed in various cancers, has spurred the development and use of epigenetic anti-cancer drugs. Here, we argue that, in addition to small-molecule inhibitors that target chromatin regulators, synthetic reader-effectors that are recruited to abnormal chromatin features have the potential to correct gene misregulation in epigenetic therapy.

    • Natecia L. Baskin
    • Karmella A. Haynes
    Comment
  • The long non-coding RNA Xist induces heterochromatinization of the X chromosome by recruiting repressive protein complexes to chromatin. Here we gather evidence, from the literature and from computational analyses, showing that Xist assemblies are similar in size, shape and composition to phase-separated condensates, such as paraspeckles and stress granules. Given the progressive sequestration of Xist’s binding partners during X-chromosome inactivation, we formulate the hypothesis that Xist uses phase separation to perform its function.

    • Andrea Cerase
    • Alexandros Armaos
    • Gian Gaetano Tartaglia
    Comment
    • Clarence E. Schutt
    • Constantine Kreatsoulas
    • Uno Lindberg
    Comment