Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Osteoarthritis

In search of phenotypes

Identifying different phenotypes of osteoarthritis is currently a subject of much research; however, a new systematic review has sparked discussion about the discrepancies in how research into disease phenotypes is conducted. Can we define individual phenotypes if we cannot agree on what constitutes a phenotype in the first place?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Defining phenotypes of osteoarthritis based on dimensions of disease.

References

  1. Felson, D. T. Identifying different osteoarthritis phenotypes through epidemiology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18, 601–604 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deveza, L. A. et al. Knee osteoarthritis phenotypes and their relevance for outcomes: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.08.009 (2017).

  3. Dell'Isola, A. et al. Identification of clinical phenotypes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 17, 425 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bastick, A. N. et al. Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Res. Ther. 17, 152 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bastick, A. N. et al. What are the prognostic factors for radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 473, 2969–2989 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. & Verhagen, A. P. Osteoarthritis subpopulations and implications for clinical trial design. Arthritis Res. Ther. 13, 213 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Middelkoop, M. et al. The OA Trial Bank: meta-analysis of individual patient data from knee and hip osteoarthritis trials show that patients with severe pain exhibit greater benefit from intra-articular glucocorticoids. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 24, 1143–1152 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun, X. et al. Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ 344, e1553 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McAlindon, T. E. et al. OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: design, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23, 747–760 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sita M. Bierma-Zeinstra.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.M.B-Z. declares that she has received consultancy fees from InFirst Healthcare and Regeneron. M.v.M. declares no competing interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bierma-Zeinstra, S., van Middelkoop, M. In search of phenotypes. Nat Rev Rheumatol 13, 705–706 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.181

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.181

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing