Key Points
-
The rostral cingulate cortex occupies a central position in models of emotion, pain and cognitive control. Work in these domains has strongly influenced recent models of social behaviour and psychopathology.
-
The segregationist view: it has been argued that the rostral cingulate cortex is functionally segregated into affective and cognitive divisions. Although this view remains influential, new data suggest that it is no longer tenable.
-
Robust links have been forged between the anterior subdivision of the midcingulate cortex (aMCC) and negative affect (as with the anticipation and delivery of pain), leading some to speculate that aMCC implements a 'domain-general' process that is integral to negative affect, pain and cognitive control.
-
Physiological evidence: a meta-analysis of activation foci from functional imaging studies of negative affect, pain and cognitive control revealed that aMCC is consistently activated by all three domains, refuting claims that cognition and emotion are strictly segregated in the cingulate.
-
Anatomical evidence: aMCC is characterized by substantial connections with subcortical regions involved in negative affect and pain (the spinothalamic system, periaqueductal grey, amygdala, nucleus accumbens and substantia nigra). Unlike other cortical 'hot spots' for emotion, aMCC harbours the rostral cingulate zone (RCZ) — a premotor area that is heavily interconnected with other motor centres (including the facial nucleus).
-
Functional evidence: measures of negative affect, pain and cognitive control exhibit convergent functional properties. These measures covary with one another and are amplified in similar ways by uncertainty about responses and outcomes.
-
The adaptive control hypothesis: the core function common to negative affect, pain and cognitive control is the need to determine an optimal course of action in the face of uncertainty — that is, to exert 'adaptive control'. We suggest that aMCC implements adaptive control by using information about punishment to bias responding in situations where the optimal course of action is uncertain or entails response competition.
-
Further evidence: pain-responsive MCC neurons are activated by the anticipation of pain, activated during instrumental escape from pain and are sensitive to manipulations of certainty and conflict. Lesions of aMCC alter how threat modulates instrumental behaviour. aMCC activity during aversively motivated learning is predicted by computational models of control and reinforcement learning.
-
These data encourage a broader perspective on the functional significance of cingulate activity, one that recognizes that aMCC did not evolve to optimize performance on laboratory measures of 'cold' cognition. The data that we have surveyed are consistent with the possibility that the contribution of aMCC to measures of cognitive control stems from its older role in regulating 'hot' behaviours.
-
The adaptive control hypothesis provides a clear roadmap to the most profitable avenues for understanding the contribution of aMCC to negative affect and pain.
Abstract
It has been argued that emotion, pain and cognitive control are functionally segregated in distinct subdivisions of the cingulate cortex. However, recent observations encourage a fundamentally different view. Imaging studies demonstrate that negative affect, pain and cognitive control activate an overlapping region of the dorsal cingulate — the anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC). Anatomical studies reveal that the aMCC constitutes a hub where information about reinforcers can be linked to motor centres responsible for expressing affect and executing goal-directed behaviour. Computational modelling and other kinds of evidence suggest that this intimacy reflects control processes that are common to all three domains. These observations compel a reconsideration of the dorsal cingulate's contribution to negative affect and pain.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brodmann, K. Brodmann's Localisation in the cerebral cortex. (ed. Garey, L. J.) (Springer, New York, 2005).
Papez, J. W. A proposed mechanism of emotion. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 38, 725–733 (1937).
Kober, H. et al. Functional grouping and cortical-subcortical interactions in emotion: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 42, 998–1031 (2008).
Tracey, I. & Mantyh, P. W. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron 55, 377–391 (2007).
Vogt, B. A. & Sikes, R. W. in Cingulate neurobiology and disease (ed. Vogt, B. A.) 311–338 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009). The authors propose a novel hypothesis about the contribution of the cingulate premotor areas to pain.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A. & Nieuwenhuis, S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306, 443–447 (2004).
Cole, M. W., Yeung, N., Freiwald, W. A. & Botvinick, M. Cingulate cortex: diverging data from humans and monkeys. Trends Neurosci. 32, 566–574 (2009).
Behrens, T. E., Hunt, L. T. & Rushworth, M. F. The computation of social behavior. Science 324, 1160–1164 (2009).
Shin, L. M. & Liberzon, I. The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 169–191 (2010).
Phillips, M. L., Ladouceur, C. D. & Drevets, W. C. A neural model of voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 13, 833–857 (2008).
Etkin, A. & Wager, T. D. Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 1476–1488 (2007).
Vogt, B. A. Cingulate neurobiology and disease (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009).
Devinsky, O., Morrell, M. J. & Vogt, B. A. Contributions of anterior cingulate to behaviour. Brain 118, 279–306 (1995).
Bush, G., Luu, P. & Posner, M. I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 215–222 (2000).
Steele, J. D. & Lawrie, S. M. Segregation of cognitive and emotional function in the prefrontal cortex: a stereotactic meta-analysis. Neuroimage 21, 868–875 (2004).
Medford, N. & Critchley, H. D. Conjoint activity of anterior insular and anterior cingulate cortex: awareness and response. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 535–549 (2010).
Luu, P. & Posner, M. I. Anterior cingulate cortex regulation of sympathetic activity. Brain 126, 2119–2120 (2003).
Etkin, A., Egner, T. & Kalisch, R. Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 85–93 (2011).
Davis, K. D. et al. Human anterior cingulate cortex neurons encode cognitive and emotional demands. J. Neurosci. 25, 8402–8406 (2005).
Sehlmeyer, C. et al. Human fear conditioning and extinction in neuroimaging: a systematic review. PLoS One 4, e5865 (2009).
Mechias, M. L., Etkin, A. & Kalisch, R. A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: implications for conscious appraisal of threat. Neuroimage 49, 1760–1768 (2010).
Drabant, E. M. et al. Experiential, autonomic, and neural responses during threat anticipation vary as a function of threat intensity and neuroticism. Neuroimage 55, 401–410 (2011).
Farrell, M. J., Laird, A. R. & Egan, G. F. Brain activity associated with painfully hot stimuli applied to the upper limb: A meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25, 129–139 (2005).
Rainville, P., Duncan, G. H., Price, D. D., Carrier, B. & Bushnell, M. C. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277, 968–971 (1997).
Vogt, B. A. Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 533–544 (2005).
Peyron, R., Laurent, B. & Garcia-Larrea, L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis. Neurophysiol. Clin. 30, 263–288 (2000).
Mobbs, D. et al. Neural activity associated with monitoring the oscillating threat value of a tarantula. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20582–20586 (2010).
Nee, D. E., Wager, T. D. & Jonides, J. Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 1–17 (2007).
Pereira, M. G. et al. Emotion affects action: Midcingulate cortex as a pivotal node of interaction between negative emotion and motor signals. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 94–106 (2010).
Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M. & Cohen, J. D. The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 111, 931–959 (2004). This paper shows how computational models of cognitive control can account for ERP markers of conflict and errors that are thought to be generated in MCC. It makes the case that control processes implemented in MCC are likely to be closely related to affective and nociceptive processes.
Seeley, W. W. et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 27, 2349–2356 (2007).
Luu, P., Collins, P. & Tucker, D. M. Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 129, 43–60 (2000).
Pessoa, L. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 148–158 (2008).
Botvinick, M. M. Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 356–366 (2007).
Wallis, J. D. & Kennerley, S. W. Heterogeneous reward signals in prefrontal cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 191–198 (2010).
Rushworth, M. F. & Behrens, T. E. Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex. Nature Neurosci. 11, 389–397 (2008).
Haber, S. N. & Knutson, B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 4–26 (2010).
Laird, A. R. et al. ALE meta-analysis workflows via the Brainmap database: progress towards a probabilistic functional brain atlas. Front. Neuroinformatics. 3, 23 (2009). This paper reviews methods for performing quantitative meta-analyses of functional imaging data using the ALE technique and BrainMap database.
Nichols, T., Brett, M., Andersson, J., Wager, T. & Poline, J. B. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 25, 653–660 (2005).
Price, D. D. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 288, 1769–1772 (2000).
Johansen-Berg, H. & Rushworth, M. F. Using diffusion imaging to study human connectional anatomy. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 75–94 (2009).
Morecraft, R. J. & Tanji, J. in Cingulate neurobiology and disease (ed. Vogt, B. A.) 113–144 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009). This chapter reviews the anatomy, physiology and function of the cingulate premotor areas, including their connections with the facial nucleus.
Picard, N. & Strick, P. L. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb. Cortex 6, 342–353 (1996).
Nee, D. E., Kastner, S. & Brown, J. W. Functional heterogeneity of conflict, error, task-switching, and unexpectedness effects within medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 54, 528–540 (2010).
Picard, N. & Strick, P. L. Imaging the premotor areas. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 663–672 (2001).
Morecraft, R. J., Stilwell-Morecraft, K. S. & Rossing, W. R. The motor cortex and facial expression: new insights from neuroscience. Neurologist 10, 235–249 (2004).
Showers, M. J. C. The cingulate gyrus: additional motor area and cortical autonomic regulator. J. Comp. Neurol. 112, 231–301 (1959).
Shackman, A. J. et al. Anxiety selectively disrupts visuospatial working memory. Emotion 6, 40–61 (2006).
Salomons, T. V., Coan, J. A., Hunt, S. M., Backonja, M. M. & Davidson, R. J. Voluntary facial displays of pain increase suffering in response to nociceptive stimulation. J. Pain 9, 443–448 (2008).
Dum, R. P., Levinthal, D. J. & Strick, P. L. The spinothalamic system targets motor and sensory areas in the cerebral cortex of monkeys. J. Neurosci. 29, 14223–14235 (2009). Using trans-synaptic anterograde transport of the herpes simplex virus, the authors demonstrated that the cingulate premotor areas are prominent targets of nociceptive information ascending from the periphery to the cortex through the spinothalamic system.
An, X., Bandler, R., Ongur, D. & Price, J. L. Prefrontal cortical projections to longitudinal columns in the midbrain periaqueductal gray in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 401, 455–479 (1998).
Ghashghaei, H. T., Hilgetag, C. C. & Barbas, H. Sequence of information processing for emotions based on the anatomic dialogue between prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Neuroimage 34, 905–923 (2007).
Morecraft, R. J. et al. Amygdala interconnections with the cingulate motor cortex in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 500, 134–165 (2007).
Roy, A. K. et al. Functional connectivity of the human amygdala using resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 45, 614–626 (2009).
Yu, C. et al. Functional segregation of the human cingulate cortex is confirmed by functional connectivity based neuroanatomical parcellation. Neuroimage 54, 2571–2581 (2011).
Freese, J. L. & Amaral, D. G. in The Human Amygdala (eds Whalen, P. J. & Phelps, E. A.) 3–42 (Guilford, New York, 2009).
Choi, J. S., Cain, C. K. & LeDoux, J. E. The role of amygdala nuclei in the expression of auditory signaled two-way active avoidance in rats. Learning & Memory 17, 139–147 (2010).
Kunishio, K. & Haber, S. N. Primate cingulostriatal projection: limbic striatal versus sensorimotor striatal input. J. Comp. Neurol. 350, 337–356 (1994).
Delgado, M. R., Li, J., Schiller, D. & Phelps, E. A. The role of the striatum in aversive learning and aversive prediction errors. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363, 3787–3800 (2008).
Jensen, J. et al. Direct activation of the ventral striatum in anticipation of aversive stimuli. Neuron 40, 1251–1257 (2003).
Levita, L. et al. The bivalent side of the nucleus accumbens. Neuroimage 44, 1178–1187 (2009).
Robinson, O. J., Frank, M. J., Sahakian, B. J. & Cools, R. Dissociable responses to punishment in distinct striatal regions during reversal learning. Neuroimage 51, 1459–1467 (2010).
Williams, S. M. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Widespread origin of the primate mesofrontal dopamine system. Cereb. Cortex 8, 321–345 (1998).
Bromberg-Martin, E. S., Matsumoto, M. & Hikosaka, O. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron 68, 815–834 (2010).
Hatanaka, N. et al. Thalamocortical and intracortical connections of monkey cingulate motor areas. J. Comp. Neurol. 462, 121–138 (2003).
Vogt, B. A. & Pandya, D. N. Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: II. Cortical afferents. J. Comp. Neurol. 262, 271–289 (1987).
Mesulam, M. M. & Mufson, E. J. Insula of the old world monkey. III: Efferent cortical output and comments on function. J. Comp. Neurol. 212, 38–52 (1982).
Cauda, F. et al. Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. Neuroimage 55, 8–23 (2011).
Wager, T. D. & Barrett, L. F. From affect to control: functional specialization of the insula in motivation and regulation. PsycExtra [online], (2004).
Wiech, K. et al. Anterior insula integrates information about salience into perceptual decisions about pain. J. Neurosci. 30, 16324–16331 (2010).
Baliki, M. N., Geha, P. Y. & Apkarian, A. V. Parsing pain perception between nociceptive representation and magnitude estimation. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 875–887 (2009).
Kurth, F., Zilles, K., Fox, P. T., Laird, A. R. & Eickhoff, S. B. A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 519–534 (2010).
Menon, V. & Uddin, L. Q. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 655–667 (2010).
Dosenbach, N. U. et al. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11073–11078 (2007).
Ullsperger, M., Harsay, H. A., Wessel, J. R. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 629–643 (2010).
Kanske, P., Heissler, J., Schonfelder, S., Bongers, A. & Wessa, M. How to Regulate Emotion? Neural Networks for Reappraisal and Distraction. Cereb. Cortex 1 Nov 2010 (doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq216).
Kavaliers, M. & Choleris, E. Antipredator responses and defensive behavior: ecological and ethological approaches for the neurosciences. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25, 577–586 (2001).
Boesch, C. The effects of leopard predation on grouping patterns in forest chimpanzees. Behaviour 117, 220–242 (1991).
Susskind, J. M. et al. Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition. Nature Neurosci. 11, 843–850 (2008).
Augustine, J. R. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res. Rev. 22, 229–244 (1996).
DeYoung, C. G. et al. Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychol. Sci. 21, 820–828 (2010).
Milad, M. R. et al. A role for the human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in fear expression. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 1191–1194 (2007).
Huster, R. J. et al. Effects of anterior cingulate fissurization on cognitive control during stroop interference. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1279–1289 (2009).
Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643–662 (1935).
Amodio, D. M., Master, S. L., Yee, C. M. & Taylor, S. E. Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology 45, 11–19 (2008). This paper demonstrated that trait-like individual differences in anxiety and behavioural inhibition are predictive of ERP indices of cognitive control thought to be generated in MCC.
Folstein, J. R. & Van Petten, C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45, 152–170 (2008).
Pud, D., Eisenberg, E., Sprecher, E., Rogowski, Z. & Yarnitsky, D. The tridimensional personality theory and pain: harm avoidance and reward dependence traits correlate with pain perception in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Pain 8, 31–38 (2004).
Harkins, S. W., Price, D. D. & Braith, J. Effects of extraversion and neuroticism on experimental pain, clinical pain, and illness behavior. Pain 36, 209–218 (1989).
Wiech, K. & Tracey, I. The influence of negative emotions on pain: behavioral effects and neural mechanisms. Neuroimage 47, 987–994 (2009).
Ploghaus, A., Becerra, L., Borras, C. & Borsook, D. Neural circuitry underlying pain modulation: expectation, hypnosis, placebo. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 197–200 (2003).
Dube, A. A. et al. Brain activity associated with the electrodermal reactivity to acute heat pain. Neuroimage 45, 169–180 (2009).
Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D. & Eelen, P. Startle intensification during painful heat. Eur. J. Pain 1, 87–94 (1997).
Hajcak, G. & Foti, D. Errors are aversive: defensive motivation and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Sci. 19, 103–108 (2008). This paper demonstrated that response errors on a standard cognitive control task are associated with enhanced negative affect, indexed using the fear-potentiated startle reflex.
Critchley, H. D., Tang, J., Glaser, D., Butterworth, B. & Dolan, R. J. Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response. Neuroimage 27, 885–895 (2005).
Cohen, B. H., Davidson, R. J., Senulis, J. A. & Saron, C. D. Muscle tension patterns during auditory attention. Biol. Psychol. 33, 133–156 (1992).
Schacht, A., Nigbur, R. & Sommer, W. Emotions in Go/NoGo conflicts. Psychol. Res. 73, 843–856 (2009).
Van Boxtel, A. & Jessurun, M. Amplitude and bilateral coherency of facial and jaw-elevator EMG activity as an index of effort during a two-choice serial reaction task. Psychophysiology 30, 589–604 (1993).
Schacht, A., Dimigen, O. & Sommer, W. Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but task-specific. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 349–456 (2010).
Sommer, M., Hajak, G., Dohnel, K., Meinhardt, J. & Muller, J. L. Emotion-dependent modulation of interference processes: an fMRI study. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Warsaw) 68, 193–203 (2008).
Van Dillen, L. F., Heslenfeld, D. J. & Koole, S. L. Tuning down the emotional brain: an fMRI study of the effects of cognitive load on the processing of affective images. Neuroimage 45, 1212–1219 (2009).
Wiech, K., Ploner, M. & Tracey, I. Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 306–313 (2008).
Buhle, J. & Wager, T. D. Performance-dependent inhibition of pain by an executive working memory task. Pain 149, 19–26 (2010).
Bantick, S. J. et al. Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI. Brain 125, 310–319 (2002).
Zhang, W. & Luo, J. The transferable placebo effect from pain to emotion: changes in behavior and EEG activity. Psychophysiology 46, 626–634 (2009).
Oka, S. et al. Predictability of painful stimulation modulates subjective and physiological responses. J. Pain 11, 239–246 (2010).
Alvarez, R. P., Chen, G., Bodurka, J., Kaplan, R. & Grillon, C. Phasic and sustained fear in humans elicits distinct patterns of brain activity. Neuroimage 55, 389–400 (2011).
Faymonville, M.-E., Vogt, B. A., Maquet, P. & Laureys, S. in Cingulate neurobiology and disease (ed. Vogt, B. A.) 381–400 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009).
Fonteyne, R., Vervliet, B., Hermans, D., Baeyens, F. & Vansteenwegen, D. Reducing chronic anxiety by making the threatening event predictable: an experimental approach. Behav. Res. Ther. 47, 830–839 (2009).
Price, D. D., Barrell, J. J. & Gracely, R. H. A psychophysical analysis of experimential factors that selectively influence the affective dimension of pain. Pain 8, 137–149 (1980).
Nielsen, C. S., Price, D. D., Vassend, O., Stubhaug, A. & Harris, J. R. Characterizing individual differences in heat-pain sensitivity. Pain 119, 65–74 (2005).
Salomons, T. V., Johnstone, T., Backonja, M. M. & Davidson, R. J. Perceived controllability modulates the neural response to pain. J. Neurosci. 24, 7199–7203 (2004).
Diener, C., Kuehner, C. & Flor, H. Loss of control during instrumental learning: a source localization study. Neuroimage 50, 717–726 (2010).
Holroyd, C. B., Krigolson, O. E., Baker, R., Lee, S. & Gibson, J. When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 59–70 (2009).
Klein, T. A. et al. Genetically determined differences in learning from errors. Science 318, 1642–1645 (2007).
Mohr, P. N. C., Biele, G. & Heerkeren, H. R. Neural processing of risk. J. Neurosci. 30, 6613–6619 (2010).
Christopoulos, G. I., Tobler, P. N., Bossaerts, P., Dolan, R. J. & Schultz, W. Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk. J. Neurosci. 29, 12574–12583 (2009).
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. & Cohen, J. D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001).
Auvray, M., Myin, E. & Spence, C. The sensory-discriminative and affective-motivational aspects of pain. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 214–223 (2010).
Seymour, B. & Dolan, R. Emotion, decision making, and the amygdala. Neuron 58, 662–671 (2008).
Craske, M. G. et al. What is an anxiety disorder? Depress. Anxiety 26, 1066–1085 (2009).
Rolls, E. T. Emotion explained (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2007).
Seymour, B., Singer, T. & Dolan, R. The neurobiology of punishment. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 300–311 (2007).
Frank, M. J., Woroch, B. S. & Curran, T. Error-related negativity predicts reinforcement learning and conflict biases. Neuron 47, 495–501 (2005). Using a probabilistic reinforcement learning paradigm, the authors demonstrated that variation in the ERN, an ERP index of cognitive control thought to be generated in MCC, was predictive of the degree to which participants learned from negative feedback.
van der Helden, J., Boksem, M. A. & Blom, J. H. The importance of failure: feedback-related negativity predicts motor learning efficiency. Cereb. Cortex 20, 1596–1603 (2010).
Hester, R., Murphy, K., Brown, F. L. & Skilleter, A. J. Punishing an error improves learning: the influence of punishment magnitude on error-related neural activity and subsequent learning. J. Neurosci. 30, 15600–15607 (2010).
Ploghaus, A. et al. Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain. Science 284, 1979–1981 (1999).
Porro, C. A. & Lui, F. in Cingulate neurobiology and disease (ed. Vogt, B. A.) 365–379 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009).
Rainville, P. Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 195–204 (2002).
Norman, D. A. & Shallice, T. in Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research and theory (eds Davidson, R. J., Schwartz, G. E. & Shapiro, D.) 1–18 (Plenum, New York, 1986).
Gray, J. A. & McNaughton, N. The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2000).
Hutchison, W. D., Davis, K. D., Lozano, A. M., Tasker, R. R. & Dostrovsky, J. O. Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nature Neurosci. 2, 403–405 (1999).
Koyama, T., Tanaka, Y. Z. & Mikami, A. Nociceptive neurons in the macaque anterior cingulate activate during anticipation of pain. Neuroreport 9, 2663–2667 (1998).
Iwata, K. et al. Anterior cingulate cortical neuronal activity during perception of noxious thermal stimuli in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1980–1991 (2005).
Nakata, H., Sakamoto, K. & Kakigi, R. Characteristics of No-go-P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms. Neurosci. Lett. 478, 124–127
Nakata, H. et al. Centrifugal modulation of human LEP components to a task-relevant noxious stimulation triggering voluntary movement. Neuroimage 45, 129–142 (2009).
Le Pera, D. et al. Inhibitory effect of voluntary movement preparation on cutaneous heat pain and laser-evoked potentials. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 1900–1907 (2007).
Rudebeck, P. H., Buckley, M. J., Walton, M. E. & Rushworth, M. F. A role for the macaque anterior cingulate gyrus in social valuation. Science 313, 1310–1312 (2006).
Kalin, N. H., Shelton, S. E. & Davidson, R. J. The role of the central nucleus of the amygdala in mediating fear and anxiety in the primate. J. Neurosci. 24, 5506–5515 (2004).
Feinstein, J. S., Adolphs, R., Damasio, A. & Tranel, D. The human amygdala and the induction and experience of fear. Curr. Biol. 21, 1–5 (2011).
Fanselow, M. S. & Lester, L. S. in Evolution and learning (eds R. C. Bolles & M. D. Beecher) 185–211 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1988).
Kalin, N. H. The neurobiology of fear. Sci. Am. 268, 94–101 (1993).
Blanchard, D. C., Hynd, A. L., Minke, K. A., Minemoto, T. & Blanchard, R. J. Human defensive behaviors to threat scenarios show parallels to fear- and anxiety-related defense patterns of non-human mammals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25, 761–770 (2001).
Kalin, N. H., Shelton, S. E., Fox, A. S., Oakes, T. R. & Davidson, R. J. Brain regions associated with the expression and contextual regulation of anxiety in primates. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 796–804 (2005).
Mobbs, D. et al. From threat to fear: the neural organization of defensive fear systems in humans. J. Neurosci. 29, 12236–12243 (2009).
Mobbs, D. et al. When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans. Science 317, 1079–1083 (2007).
Holroyd, C. B. & Yeung, N. in The Neural Basis of Motivational and Cognitive Control (eds R. B. Mars, J. Sallet, M. F. S. Rushworth & N. Yeung) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, in press).
Schiller, D., Levy, I., Niv, Y., LeDoux, J. E. & Phelps, E. A. From fear to safety and back: reversal of fear in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 28, 11517–11525 (2008).
Jocham, G., Neumann, J., Klein, T. A., Danielmeier, C. & Ullsperger, M. Adaptive coding of action values in the human rostral cingulate zone. J. Neurosci. 29, 7489–7496 (2009).
Gläscher, J. & Büchel, C. Formal learning theory dissociates brain regions with different temporal integration. Neuron 47, 295–306 (2005).
Seymour, B. et al. Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans. Nature 429, 664–667 (2004).
Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J. & Davis, K. D. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 615–620 (2002).
Atlas, L. Y., Bolger, N., Lindquist, M. A. & Wager, T. D. Brain mediators of predictive cue effects on perceived pain. J. Neurosci. 30, 12964–12977 (2010).
Legrain, V., Iannetti, G. D., Plaghki, L. & Mouraux, A. The pain matrix reloaded A salience detection system for the body. Prog. Neurobiol. 93, 111–113 (2011).
Hart, D. L. & Sussman, R. W. Man the Hunted (Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 2008).
Johansen, J. P. & Fields, H. L. Glutamatergic activation of anterior cingulate cortex produces an aversive teaching signal. Nature Neurosci. 7, 398–403 (2004).
Cisek, P. & Kalaska, J. F. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 269–298 (2010).
Derbyshire, S. W., Vogt, B. A. & Jones, A. K. Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 118, 52–60 (1998).
Kwan, C. L., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J. & Davis, K. D. An fMRI study of the anterior cingulate cortex and surrounding medial wall activations evoked by noxious cutaneous heat and cold stimuli. Pain 85, 359–374 (2000).
Davis, K. D., Hutchison, W. D., Lozano, A. M., Tasker, R. R. & Dostrovsky, J. O. Human anterior cingulate cortex neurons modulated by attention-demanding tasks. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 3575–3577 (2000).
Orr, J. M. & Weissman, D. H. Anterior cingulate cortex makes 2 contributions to minimizing distraction. Cereb. Cortex 19, 703–711 (2009).
Venkatraman, V., Rosati, A. G., Taren, A. A. & Huettel, S. A. Resolving response, decision, and strategic control: evidence for a functional topography in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 29, 13158–13164 (2009).
Op de Beeck, H. P., Haushofer, J. & Kanwisher, N. G. Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 123–135 (2008).
Morrison, I. & Downing, P. E. Organization of felt and seen pain responses in anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage 37, 642–651 (2007).
Oler, J. A. et al. Amygdalar and hippocampal substrates of anxious temperament differ in their heritability. Nature 466, 864–868 (2010).
Stern, E. R., Welsh, R. C., Fitzgerald, K. D. & Taylor, S. F. Topographic analysis of individual activation patterns in medial frontal cortex in schizophrenia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2146–2156 (2009).
Kosslyn, S. M. et al. Bridging psychology and biology: the analysis of individuals in groups. Am. Psychol. 57, 341–351 (2002).
Piche, M., Arsenault, M. & Rainville, P. Dissection of perceptual, motor and autonomic components of brain activity evoked by noxious stimulation. Pain 149, 453–462 (2010). The authors used inter- and intra-individual variation in pain reports and peripheral physiology (electrodermal and electromyographic activity) to understand the functional significance of activation in different regions of the rostral cingulate during painful electrical stimulation.
Cohen, M. X. & Ranganath, C. Behavioral and neural predictors of upcoming decisions. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 5, 117–126 (2005).
Izard, C. E. Four systems for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychol. Rev. 100, 68–90 (1993).
Stephan, K. E. On the role of general system theory for functional neuroimaging. J. Anat. 205, 443–470 (2004).
Hanke, M. et al. PyMVPA: A unifying approach to the analysis of neuroscientific Data. Front. Neuroinformatics 3, 3 (2009).
Downing, P. E., Wiggett, A. J. & Peelen, M. V. Functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of overlapping lateral occipitotemporal activations using multi-voxel pattern analysis. J. Neurosci. 27, 226–233 (2007).
Walsh, B. J., Buonocore, M. H., Carter, C. S. & Mangun, G. R. Integrating conflict detection and attentional control mechanisms. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2 Dec 2010 (doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21595).
Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001).
Kienast, T. et al. Dopamine in amygdala gates limbic processing of aversive stimuli in humans. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1381–1382 (2008).
Yacubian, J. et al. Dissociable systems for gain- and loss-related value predictions and errors of prediction in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 26, 9530–9537 (2006).
Ousdal, O. T. et al. The human amygdala is involved in general behavioral relevance detection: evidence from an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging Go-NoGo task. Neuroscience 156, 450–455 (2008).
Polli, F. E. et al. Hemispheric differences in amygdala contributions to response monitoring. Neuroreport 20, 398–402 (2009).
Nishijo, H., Hori, E., Tazumi, T. & Ono, T. Neural correlates to both emotion and cognitive functions in the monkey amygdala. Behav. Brain Res. 188, 14–23 (2008).
Brazdil, M. et al. Error processing — evidence from intracerebral recordings. Exp. Brain Res. 146, 460–466 (2002).
Polli, F. E. et al. Reduced error-related activation in two anterior cingulate circuits is related to impaired performance in schizophrenia. Brain 131, 971–986 (2008).
Pourtois, G. et al. Errors recruit both cognitive and emotional monitoring systems: Simultaneous intracranial recordings in the dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus and amygdala combined with fMRI. Neuropsychologia 48, 1144–1159 (2010).
Vogt, B. A. in Cingulate neurobiology and disease (ed. Vogt, B. A.) 65–94 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009).
Ford, K. A., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S. & Everling, S. BOLD fMRI activation for anti-saccades in nonhuman primates. Neuroimage 45, 470–476 (2009).
Graziano, M. S. & Aflalo, T. N. Mapping behavioral repertoire onto the cortex. Neuron 56, 239–251 (2007).
Floden, D., Vallesi, A. & Stuss, D. T. Task context and frontal love activation in the Stroop task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 867–879 (2010).
Yeung, N. & Cohen, J. D. The impact of cognitive deficits on conflict monitoring: Predictable dissociations between the error-related negativity and N2. Psychol. Sci. 17, 164–171 (2006).
Swick, D. & Turken, A. U. Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16354–16359 (2002).
deCharms, R. C. et al. Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional, MRI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18626–18631 (2005).
Fornito, A. et al. Variability of the paracingulate sulcus and morphometry of the medial frontal cortex: associations with cortical thickness, surface area, volume, and sulcal depth. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 222–236 (2008).
Leonard, C. M., Towler, S., Welcome, S. & Chiarello, C. Paracingulate asymmetry in anterior and midcingulate cortex: sex differences and the effect of measurement technique. Brain Struct. Funct. 213, 553–569 (2009).
Vogt, B. A., Nimchinsky, E. A., Vogt, L. J. & Hof, P. R. Human cingulate cortex: surface features, flat maps, and cytoarchitecture. J. Comp. Neurol. 359, 490–506 (1995).
Crosson, B. et al. Left-hemisphere processing of emotional connotation during word generation. Neuroreport 10, 2449–2455 (1999).
Heckers, S. et al. Anterior cingulate cortex activation during cognitive interference in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 707–715 (2004).
Buchel, C. et al. Dissociable neural responses related to pain intensity, stimulus intensity, and stimulus awareness within the anterior cingulate cortex: a parametric single-trial laser functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 22, 970–976 (2002).
Peyron, R. et al. Haemodynamic brain responses to acute pain in humans: sensory and attentional networks. Brain 122, 1765–1780 (1999).
Paus, T. et al. Human cingulate and paracingulate sulci: pattern, variability, asymmetry, and probabilistic map. Cereb. Cortex 6, 207–214 (1996).
DeArmond, S. J., Fusco, J. F. & Dewy, M. M. Structure of the human brain: a photographic atlas (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1989).
Brown, J. W. Multiple cognitive control effects of error likelihood and conflict. Psychol. Res. 73, 744–750 (2009).
Mansouri, F. A., Tanaka, K. & Buckley, M. J. Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 10, 141–152 (2009).
Grinband, J. et al. The dorsal medial frontal cortex is sensitive to time on task, not response conflict or error likelihood. Neuroimage 17 Dec 2010 (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.027).
Carp, J., Kim, K., Taylor, S. F., Fitzgerald, K. D. & Weissman, D. H. Conditional differences in mean reaction time explain effects of response congruency, but not accuracy, on posterior medial frontal cortex activity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 231 (2010).
Alexander, W. H. & Brown, J. W. Computational models of performance monitoring and cognitive control. Topics Cogn. Science 2, 658–677 (2010). The authors review prominent models of cognitive control and reinforcement learning that have been used to understand the functional significance of rostral cingulate cortex activity.
King, J. A., Korb, F. M., Von Cramon, D. Y. & Ullsperger, M. Post-error behavioral adjustments are facilitated by activation and suppression of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information processing. J. Neurosci. 30, 12759–12769 (2010).
Gehring, W. J. & Knight, R. T. Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neurosci. 3, 516–520 (2000).
Holroyd, C. B. & Coles, M. G. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 109, 679–709 (2002).
Steinhauser, M. & Yeung, N. Decision processes in human performance monitoring. J. Neurosci. 30, 15643–15653 (2010).
Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J. & Friesen, W. V. The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 342–353 (1990).
Koyama, T., Kato, K., Tanaka, Y. Z. & Mikami, A. Anterior cingulate activity during pain-avoidance and reward tasks in monkeys. Neurosci. Res. 39, 421–430 (2001).
Liu, X., Hairston, J., Schrier, M. & Fan, J. Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24 Dec 2010 (doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.012).
Palomero-Gallagher, N., Vogt, B. A., Schleicher, A., Mayberg, H. S. & Zilles, K. Receptor architecture of human cingulate cortex: evaluation of the four-region neurobiological model. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2336–2355 (2009).
Zilles, K. & Amunts, K. Centenary of Brodmann's map — conception and fate. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 139–145 (2010).
Vogt, B. A. in Cingulate neurobiology and disease (ed. Vogt, B. A.) 3–30 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009).
Laird, A. R. et al. ALE meta-analysis: controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25, 155–164 (2005).
Morecraft, R. J., Louie, J. L., Herrick, J. L. & Stilwell-Morecraft, K. S. Cortical innervation of the facial nucleus in the non-human primate: a new interpretation of the effects of stroke and related subtotal brain trauma on the muscles of facial expression. Brain 124, 176–208 (2001).
Waller, B. M., Parr, L. A., Gothard, K. M., Burrows, A. M. & Fuglevand, A. J. Mapping the contribution of single muscles to facial movements in the Rhesus macaque. Physiol. Behav. 95, 93–100 (2008).
Burrows, A. M. The facial expression musculature in primates and its evolutionary significance. Bioessays 30, 212–225 (2008).
Darwin, C. The expression of the emotions in man and animals (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Laboratory for Affective Neuroscience and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior staff A. Dinndorf, M. Fox, L. Friedman, L. Hinsenkamp, A. Koppenhaver, A. Laird, B. Nacewicz, D. Rebedew and J.E. Shackman for assistance; M.X. Cohen, W. Irwin, S. Nieuwenhuis, J. Oler, and T. Yarkoni for feedback; and G. Bush for providing details of the meta-analysis described in reference 14. This work was supported by the European Commission (Marie Curie Reintegration Grant to H.A.S.), the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain (Clinician-Scientist award to T.V.S.), Fetzer Foundation (R.J.D.), and National Institute of Mental Health (P50-MH069315, P50-MH084051 and R01-MH43454 (R.J.D.); A.J.S. was partially supported by R01-MH064498 (B.R. Postle); A.S.F. was supported by T32-MH018931 (R.J.D.)).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information S1 (box)
Method: Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis (CBMA) of Functional Imaging Studies (PDF 2298 kb)
Related links
Related links
FURTHER INFORMATION
http://www.healthemotions.org/
http://www.investigatinghealthyminds.org/cihmLaboratory.html
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Glossary
- Cognitive control
-
A range of elementary processes (such as attention, inhibition and learning) that are engaged when automatic or habitual responses are insufficient to sustain goal-directed behaviour. Control can be engaged proactively or reactively.
- Computational model
-
A mathematically detailed simulation of a psychological construct that can afford quantitative predictions of trial-by-trial fluctuations in behaviour and neurophysiology.
- Reinforcement learning models
-
(Often abbreviated to RL models.) A class of computational models describing how organisms learn to maximize reinforcement based on experience. RL models assume that organisms update reinforcer expectations on the basis of prediction errors and the current learning rate.
- Stroop task
-
A task in which subjects rapidly respond to a colour word, such as 'blue', on the basis of the colour in which the letters are displayed. The task is easy when the colour and word are compatible ('blue' depicted in blue), but is more difficult when the two are incompatible ('blue' depicted in red).
- Go/No-Go task
-
A task in which subjects must rapidly respond to one kind of cue ('Go') while withholding responses to another ('No-Go').
- Eriksen Flanker task
-
A task in which subjects rapidly respond to a centrally presented visual cue, such as an arrowhead, that is neighboured (flanked) by cues that can potentially code an alternative response.
- Instrumental behaviour
-
Behaviour that is goal-directed insofar as it increases the likelihood of obtaining rewards or avoiding punishments. Instrumental behaviour is distinguished from behaviours that are reflexively elicited independent of reinforcement, as in Pavlovian (classical) conditioning.
- Reinforcer
-
A stimulus that is capable (intrinsically or through learning) of eliciting instrumental behaviour; reward and punishment.
- Attentional set
-
A template, rule or goal held in memory to guide attention (for example, search for angry faces in a crowded visual scene).
- Architectonic area
-
A region of the brain defined by its cellular and molecular neuroanatomy, including neuronal structure (cytoarchitecture), myelin structure (myeloarchitecture) and neurochemistry (chemoarchitecture).
- Electrodermal activity
-
(Often abbreviated to EDA.) Changes in the electrical resistance of the dermis stemming from activity of the sweat glands. EDA reflects activation in the sympathetic nervous system and is used to index arousal, stress and cognitive load.
- Event-related potential
-
(Often abbreviated to ERP.) A scalp-recorded measure of the average brain electrical activity evoked by a particular stimulus or response.
- Fear-potentiated startle reflex
-
A reflex evoked by the sudden onset of high-intensity stimuli (for example, a loud noise) and amplified by negative affect. In humans, this is measured using electrodes overlying orbicularis oculi, the muscle responsible for eye blinks.
- Response conflict
-
Competition elicited by stimuli associated with multiple, incompatible response tendencies — as in the Stroop task.
- Prediction error
-
In reinforcement learning models, an explicit description of the discrepancy between reinforcer expectations and actual reinforcement.
- Electromyography
-
(Often abbreviated to EMG.) Recordings of electrical activity generated by the skeletal musculature.
- Neurofeedback
-
A kind of learning in which real-time neural activity is employed as feedback.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shackman, A., Salomons, T., Slagter, H. et al. The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 12, 154–167 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2994
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2994
This article is cited by
-
Neural sensitivity following stress predicts anhedonia symptoms: a 2-year multi-wave, longitudinal study
Translational Psychiatry (2024)
-
Electrophysiological signatures of anxiety in Parkinson’s disease
Translational Psychiatry (2024)
-
Immersion in nature enhances neural indices of executive attention
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Aging, cingulate cortex, and cognition: insights from structural MRI, emotional recognition, and theory of mind
Brain Structure and Function (2024)
-
Asymmetric coding of reward prediction errors in human insula and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
Nature Communications (2023)