Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Quantifying spatial correlations of fluorescent markers using enhanced background reduction with protein proximity index and correlation coefficient estimations

Abstract

Interactions of proteins are examined by detecting their overlap using fluorescent markers. The observed overlap is then quantified to serve as a measure of spatial correlation. A major drawback of this approach is that it can produce false values because of the properties of the image background. To remedy this, we provide a protocol to reduce the contribution of image background and then apply a protein proximity index (PPI) and correlation coefficient to estimate colocalization. Background heterogeneity is reduced by the median filtering procedure, comprising two steps, to reduce random noise and background, respectively. Alternatively, background can be reduced by advanced thresholding. PPI provides separate values for each channel to characterize the contribution of each protein, whereas correlation coefficient determines the overall colocalization. The protocol is demonstrated using computer-simulated and real biological images. It minimizes human bias and can be universally applied to various cell types in which there is a need to understand protein-protein interactions. Background reductions require 3–5 min per image. Quantifications take <1 min. The entire procedure takes approximately 15–30 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Flowchart of the procedure for quantification of the spatial correlation of fluorescent markers.
Figure 2: Screenshots of the computer setup for using median filtering–based background reduction.
Figure 3: Screenshots of the computer setup for applying threshold-based background reduction.
Figure 4: Screenshots of the computer setup for performing PPI calculations.
Figure 5: Quantification of colocalization using computer-simulated dual-color images with predefined colocalization and without any background or nonspecific fluorescence.
Figure 6: Quantification of colocalization using computer-simulated dual-color images with predefined colocalization and without any background or nonspecific fluorescence.
Figure 7: Quantification of colocalization using computer-simulated dual-color images with predefined colocalization and without any background or nonspecific fluorescence.
Figure 8: Quantification of colocalization using computer-simulated dual-color mages with predefined colocalization and without any background or nonspecific fluorescence.
Figure 9: Quantification of colocalization using a real biological image with nonreduced background.
Figure 10: Quantification of colocalization on a set of computer-simulated images modeled on a real biological image shown in Figure 9.
Figure 11: Quantification of colocalization on a set of computer-simulated images modeled on a real biological image shown in Figure 9.
Figure 12: Quantification of colocalization on a real unprocessed biological image showing dual staining for platelet-activating factor receptor (PAF-R; red fluorescence) and CD4 (green fluorescence) on macrophages in conjunctiva.
Figure 13: Quantification of colocalization on the image shown in Figure 12 after median filtering background reduction and PPI estimations.
Figure 14: Quantification of colocalization on the image shown in Figure 12 after threshold-based background reduction and coefficient estimations.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuriyan, J. & Eisenberg, D. The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 450, 983–990 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Konig, P. et al. FRET-CLSM and double-labeling indirect immunofluorescence to detect close association of proteins in tissue sections. Lab. Invest. 86, 853–864 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smallcombe, A. Multicolor imaging: the important question of co-localization. BioTechniques 30, 1240–1242, 1244–1246 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zinchuk, V. & Grossenbacher-Zinchuk, O. Recent advances in quantitative colocalization analysis: focus on neuroscience. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 44, 125–172 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Manders, E.M.M., Verbeek, F.J. & Aten, J.A. Measurement of co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images. J. Microsc. 169, 375–382 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolte, S. & Cordelieres, F.P. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 224, 213–232 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zinchuk, V. & Zinchuk, O. Quantitative colocalization analysis of confocal fluorescence microscopy images. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 4 Unit 4 19 (2008).

  8. French, A.P., Mills, S., Swarup, R., Bennett, M.J. & Pridmore, T.P. Colocalization of fluorescent markers in confocal microscope images of plant cells. Nat. Protoc. 3, 619–628 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waters, J.C. Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1135–1148 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ono, M. et al. Quantitative comparison of anti-fading media for confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49, 305–312 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Landmann, L. & Marbet, P. Colocalization analysis yields superior results after image restoration. Microsc. Res. Tech. 64, 103–112 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zinchuk, V., Zinchuk, O., Akimaru, K., Moriya, F. & Okada, T. Ethanol consumption alters expression and colocalization of bile salt export pump and multidrug resistance protein 2 in the rat. Histochem. Cell Biol. 127, 503–512 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw, P. & Rawlins, D.J. The point spread function of confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution. J. Microsc. 163, 151–165 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, Y. et al. Quantitative determination of spatial protein-protein correlations in fluorescence confocal microscopy. Biophys. J. 98, 493–504 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Manley, S. Putting super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to work. Nat. Methods 6, 21–23 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haugland, R.P. The Handbook: A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies 10th edn (Invitrogen, Inc., 2005).

  17. Schneider Gasser, E.M. et al. Immunofluorescence in brain sections: simultaneous detection of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins in identified neurons. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1887–1897 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adler, J. & Parmryd, I. Quantifying colocalization by correlation: the Pearson correlation coefficient is superior to the Mander's overlap coefficient. Cytometry A 77, 733–742 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by National Institutes of Health grant no. HL088640 and the American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship no. 10POST4230081. We thank M. Celio (Fribourg University) for help in organizing the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.Z. conceived and organized the study, designed and conducted experiments and wrote the paper; Y.W. conducted experiments and contributed to writing, O.G.-Z. designed and conducted experiments and contributed to writing; and E.S. helped to organize the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vadim Zinchuk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Pair 1: 0% colocalization. Red channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Pair 1: 0% colocalization. Green channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Pair 2: 25% colocalization. Red channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Pair 2: 25% colocalization. Green channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Pair 3: 50% colocalization. Red channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6

Pair 3: 50% colocalization. Green channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 7

Pair 4: 75% colocalization. Red channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 8

Pair 4: 75% colocalization. Green channel. (TIFF 769 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinchuk, V., Wu, Y., Grossenbacher-Zinchuk, O. et al. Quantifying spatial correlations of fluorescent markers using enhanced background reduction with protein proximity index and correlation coefficient estimations. Nat Protoc 6, 1554–1567 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.384

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.384

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing