Schlaeger, T.M. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. doi:10.1038/nbt.3070 (1 December 2014).
Schlaeger et al. report a systematic comparison of three methods for reprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells that do not involve incorporation of exogenous DNA into the genome. They reprogrammed human fibroblasts using a Sendai virus–based system, an episomal system, or mRNA-based reprogramming, benchmarking these to integrating viral methods. They report no discernible difference between the methods in terms of pluripotency or differentiation potential of the resulting cells. RNA-based reprogramming is more efficient (when it succeeds), but it has an overall lower success rate than the other methods. Episomal reprogramming generates cells with a slightly higher incidence of karyotypic instability, but this is still lower than that seen with retroviral reprogramming. Cells reprogrammed with Sendai virus require a relatively long time until they are vector free. The most appropriate method will depend on the needs of each laboratory; this analysis should help researchers decide which reprogramming method best meets their needs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reprogramming methods compared. Nat Methods 12, 105 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3265
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3265