Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Nanofibrous hollow microspheres self-assembled from star-shaped polymers as injectable cell carriers for knee repair

Abstract

To repair complexly shaped tissue defects, an injectable cell carrier is desirable to achieve an accurate fit and to minimize surgical intervention. However, the injectable carriers available at present have limitations, and are not used clinically for cartilage regeneration. Here, we report nanofibrous hollow microspheres self-assembled from star-shaped biodegradable polymers as an injectable cell carrier. The nanofibrous hollow microspheres, integrating the extracellular-matrix-mimicking architecture with a highly porous injectable form, were shown to efficiently accommodate cells and enhance cartilage regeneration, compared with control microspheres. The nanofibrous hollow microspheres also supported a significantly larger amount of, and higher-quality, cartilage regeneration than the chondrocytes-alone group in an ectopic implantation model. In a critical-size rabbit osteochondral defect-repair model, the nanofibrous hollow microspheres/chondrocytes group achieved substantially better cartilage repair than the chondrocytes-alone group that simulates the clinically available autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure. These results indicate that the nanofibrous hollow microspheres are an excellent injectable cell carrier for cartilage regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A schematic of SS-PLLA synthesis and nanofibrous hollow microsphere fabrication.
Figure 2: Characterization of nanofibrous hollow microspheres, nanofibrous microspheres and solid-interior microspheres.
Figure 3: Assessment of chondrocyte adhesion and in vitro cartilage tissue formation on different microspheres.
Figure 4: Comparison of various microspheres as cell carriers for ectopic cartilage regeneration in vivo.
Figure 5: Comparison between neo-cartilage tissues regenerated from nanofibrous hollow microspheres/chondrocytes and PEG/chondrocytes constructs after eight weeks of subcutaneous implantation in nude mice.
Figure 6: Evaluation of critical-size rabbit osteochondral defect repair eight weeks after injection.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langer, R. & Vacanti, J. P. Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920–926 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oberpenning, F., Meng, J., Yoo, J. J. & Atala, A. De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnol. 17, 149–155 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, P., Hu, J. & Ma, P. X. The engineering of patient-specific, anatomically shaped, digits. Biomaterials 30, 2735–2740 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, V. J., Smith, L. A. & Ma, P. X. Bone regeneration on computer-designed nano-fibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials 27, 3973–3979 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elisseeff, J. et al. Transdermal photopolymerization for minimally invasive implantation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3104–3107 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kloxin, A. M., Kasko, A. M., Salinas, C. N. & Anseth, K. S. Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 324, 59–63 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rice, M. A., Waters, K. R. & Anseth, K. S. Ultrasound monitoring of cartilaginous matrix evolution in degradable PEG hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 5, 152–161 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, D. A. et al. Multifunctional chondroitin sulphate for cartilage tissue–biomaterial integration. Nature Mater. 6, 385–392 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Benoit, D. S., Schwartz, M. P., Durney, A. R. & Anseth, K. S. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nature Mater. 7, 816–823 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strehin, I., Nahas, Z., Arora, K., Nguyen, T. & Elisseeff, J. A versatile pH sensitive chondroitin sulphate-PEG tissue adhesive and hydrogel. Biomaterials 31, 2788–2797 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Esfand, R. & Tomalia, D. A. Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers: From biomimicry to drug delivery and biomedical applications. Drug Discovery Today 6, 427–436 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, J. C., Bhalgat, M. K. & Zera, R. T. Preliminary biological evaluation of polyamidoamine (PAMAM) Starburst(TM) dendrimers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30, 53–65 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens, M. M. & George, J. H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310, 1135–1138 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meredith, J. E., Fazeli, B. & Schwartz, M. A. The extracellular-matrix as a cell-survival factor. Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 953–961 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gullberg, D. & Ekblom, P. Extracellular matrix and its receptors during development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 39, 845–854 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosso, F., Giordano, A., Barbarisi, M. & Barbarisi, A. From cell–ECM interactions to tissue engineering. J. Cell. Physiol. 199, 174–180 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma, P.X. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 184–198 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, X. H. & Ma, P. X. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 477–486 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo, K. M., Chen, V. J. & Ma, P. X. Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 67A, 531–537 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Benya, P. D. & Shaffer, J. D. Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell 30, 215–224 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu, J., Feng, K., Liu, X. & Ma, P. X. Chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiations of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on a nanofibrous scaffold with designed pore network. Biomaterials 30, 5061–5067 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitragotri, S. & Lahann, J. Physical approaches to biomaterial design. Nature Mater. 8, 15–23 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, Z., McCaffery, J. M., Spencer, R. G. & Francomano, C. A. Growth and integration of neocartilage with native cartilage in vitro. J. Orthop. Res. 23, 433–439 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahsan, T. & Sah, R. L. Biomechanics of integrative cartilage repair. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 7, 29–40 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hunziker, E. B. Articular cartilage repair: Basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 10, 432–463 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Driscoll, S. W., Keeley, F. W. & Salter, R. B. The chondrogenic potential of free autogenous periosteal grafts for biological resurfacing of major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 68, 1017–1035 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Institutes of Health (Research Grants DE015384 and DE017689: P.X.M.). The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance from J. Hu in the animal experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.L. and X.J. contributed overall equally to the experimental work. X.L. carried out the polymer synthesis, fabrication of microspheres and structural characterization. X.J. carried out the cell culture, animal studies and tissue analyses. P.X.M. was responsible for the overall project design and manuscript organization. All authors contributed to the scientific planning, data analysis and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter X. Ma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Jin, X. & Ma, P. Nanofibrous hollow microspheres self-assembled from star-shaped polymers as injectable cell carriers for knee repair. Nature Mater 10, 398–406 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2999

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2999

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing