Abstract
Tissue engineering aims at developing functional substitutes for damaged tissues and organs. Before transplantation, cells are generally seeded on biomaterial scaffolds that recapitulate the extracellular matrix and provide cells with information that is important for tissue development. Here we review the nanocomposite nature of the extracellular matrix, describe the design considerations for different tissues and discuss the impact of nanostructures on the properties of scaffolds and their uses in monitoring the behaviour of engineered tissues. We also examine the different nanodevices used to trigger certain processes for tissue development, and offer our view on the principal challenges and prospects of applying nanotechnology in tissue engineering.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langer, R. & Vacanti, J. P. Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920–926 (1993).
Freed, L. E. et al. Advanced tools for tissue engineering: Scaffolds, bioreactors, and signaling. Tissue Eng. 12, 3285–3305 (2006).
Place, E. S., Evans, N. D. & Stevens, M. M. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nature Mater. 8, 457–470 (2009).
Lutolf, M. P. & Hubbell, J. A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nature Biotech. 23, 47–55 (2005).
Tsang, K. Y., Cheung, M. C., Chan, D. & Cheah, K. S. The developmental roles of the extracellular matrix: beyond structure to regulation. Cell Tissue Res. 339, 93–110 (2010).
Bauer, A. L., Jackson, T. L. & Jiang, Y. Topography of extracellular matrix mediates vascular morphogenesis and migration speeds in angiogenesis. PLoS Comp. Biol. 5, e1000445 (2009).
Levental, K. R. et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 139, 891–906 (2009).
Evans, N. D. et al. Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. Eur. Cell Mater. 18, 1–13; discussion 13–14 (2009).
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y. L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143 (2005).
Cohen, E. D. et al. Wnt signaling regulates smooth muscle precursor development in the mouse lung via a tenascin C/PDGFR pathway. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 2538–2549 (2009).
Rozario, T. & DeSimone, D. W. The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: A dynamic view. Dev. Biol. 341, 126–140 (2010).
Ott, H. C. et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: Using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nature Med. 14, 213–221 (2008).
Uygun, B. E. et al. Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix. Nature Med. 16, 814–820 (2010).
Grayson, W. L. et al. Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3299–3304 (2010).
Gui, L., Muto, A., Chan, S. A., Breuer, C. K. & Niklason, L. E. Development of decellularized human umbilical arteries as small-diameter vascular grafts. Tissue Eng. A 15, 2665–2676 (2009).
Petersen, T. H. et al. Tissue-engineered lungs for in vivo implantation. Science 329, 538–541.
Hynes, R. O. The extracellular matrix: Not just pretty fibrils. Science 326, 1216–1219 (2009).
Sasisekharan, R., Shriver, Z., Venkataraman, G. & Narayanasami, U. Roles of heparan-sulphate glycosaminoglycans in cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 2, 521–528 (2002).
Lee, S. et al. Preparation of macroporous carbon nanofibres with macroscopic openings in the surfaces and their applications. Nanotechnology 20, 445702 (2009).
Ayres, C. E., Jha, B. S., Sell, S. A., Bowlin, G. L. & Simpson, D. G. Nanotechnology in the design of soft tissue scaffolds: innovations in structure and function. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2, 20–34 (2010).
Barnes, C. P., Sell, S. A., Boland, E. D., Simpson, D. G. & Bowlin, G. L. Nanofiber technology: Designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59, 1413–1433 (2007).
Zhang, S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 1171–1178 (2003).
Ma, Z. W., Kotaki, M., Inai, R. & Ramakrishna, S. Potential of nanofiber matrix as tissue-engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 11, 101–109 (2005).
Zeng, J. et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibres by electrospinning as a protein delivery system and the retardation of enzyme release by additional polymer coatings. Biomacromolecules 6, 1484–1488 (2005).
Sun, Z. C., Zussman, E., Yarin, A. L., Wendorff, J. H. & Greiner, A. Compound core–shell polymer nanofibres by co-electrospinning. Adv. Mater. 15, 1929–1932 (2003).
Ionescu, L. C., Lee, G. C., Sennett, B. J., Burdick, J. A. & Mauck, R. L. An anisotropic nanofiber/microsphere composite with controlled release of biomolecules for fibrous tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31, 4113–4120 (2010).
Cao, H. Q., Jiang, X., Chai, C. & Chew, S. Y. RNA interference by nanofiber-based siRNA delivery system. J. Cont. Release 144, 203–212 (2010).
Dong, B., Smith, M. E. & Wnek, G. E. Encapsulation of multiple biological compounds within a single electrospun fiber. Small 5, 1508–1512 (2009).
Freeman, I. & Cohen, S. The influence of the sequential delivery of angiogenic factors from affinity-binding alginate scaffolds on vascularization. Biomaterials 30, 2122–2131 (2009).
Yilgor, P., Tuzlakoglu, K., Reis, R. L., Hasirci, N. & Hasirci, V. Incorporation of a sequential BMP-2/BMP-7 delivery system into chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30, 3551–3559 (2009).
Moroni, L., Schotel, R., Hamann, D., de Wijn, J. R. & van Blitterswijk, C. A. 3D fiber-deposited electrospun integrated scaffolds enhance cartilage tissue formation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 53–60 (2008).
Hartgerink, J. D., Beniash, E. & Stupp, S. I. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibres. Science 294, 1684–1688 (2001).
Cui, H., Webber, M. J. & Stupp, S. I. Self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles: From molecules to nanostructures to biomaterials. Biopolymers 94, 1–18 (2010).
Gelain, F., Bottai, D., Vescovi, A. & Zhang, S. Designer self-assembling peptide nanofibrescaffolds for adult mouse neural stem cell 3-dimensional cultures. PLoS One 1, e119 (2006).
Xu, J. et al. Endothelial cells anchoring by functionalized yeast polypeptide. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 87, 819–824 (2008).
Rexeisen, E. L. et al. Self-assembly of fibronectin mimetic peptide-amphiphile nanofibres. Langmuir 26, 1953–1959 (2009).
Silva, G. A. et al. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanofibers. Science 303, 1352–1355 (2004).
Heino, J. & Kapyla, J. Cellular receptors of extracellular matrix molecules. Curr. Pharm. Des. 15, 1309–1317 (2009).
Stevens, M. M. & George, J. H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310, 1135–1138 (2005).
Schofer, M. D. et al. Effect of direct RGD incorporation in PLLA nanofibres on growth and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 20, 1535–1540 (2009).
Jeon, O., Powell, C., Ahmed, S. M. & Alsberg, E. Biodegradable, photocrosslinked alginate hydrogels with independently tailorable physical properties and cell adhesivity. Tissue Eng. A 16(9): 2915–2925 (2010).
Re'em, T., Tsur-Gang, O. & Cohen, S. The effect of immobilized RGD peptide in macroporous alginate scaffolds on TGFbeta1-induced chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31, 6746–6755 (2010).
Casper, C. L., Yang, W., Farach-Carson, M. C. & Rabolt, J. F. Coating electrospun collagen and gelatin fibres with perlecan domain I for increased growth factor binding. Biomacromolecules 8, 1116–1123 (2007).
Zhou, H. et al. Enhanced bioactivity of bone morphogenetic protein-2 with low dose of 2-N, 6-O-sulfated chitosan in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 30, 1715–1724 (2009).
Freeman, I., Kedem, A. & Cohen, S. The effect of sulfation of alginate hydrogels on the specific binding and controlled release of heparin-binding proteins. Biomaterials 29, 3260–3268 (2008).
Dvir, T. et al. Prevascularization of cardiac patch on the omentum improves its therapeutic outcome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14990–14995 (2009).
Bettinger, C. J., Langer, R. & Borenstein, J. T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5406–5415 (2009).
Teixeira, A. I., Abrams, G. A., Bertics, P. J., Murphy, C. J. & Nealey, P. F. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J. Cell. Sci. 116, 1881–1892 (2003). This work is among the first to document that the nanotopographic features encountered in the native basement membrane can profoundly affect cell behaviour.
Dalby, M. J. et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nature Mater. 6, 997–1003 (2007).
Kotov, N. A. et al. Nanomaterials for neural interfaces. Adv. Mater. 21, 3970–4004 (2009).
Parker, K. K. & Ingber, D. E. Extracellular matrix, mechanotransduction and structural hierarchies in heart tissue engineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 362, 1267–1279 (2007).
Zimmermann, W. H. et al. Tissue engineering of a differentiated cardiac muscle construct. Circ. Res. 90, 223–230 (2002).
Dvir, T., Levy, O., Shachar, M., Granot, Y. & Cohen, S. Activation of the ERK1/2 cascade via pulsatile interstitial fluid flow promotes cardiac tissue assembly. Tissue Eng. 13, 2185–2193 (2007).
Radisic, M. et al. Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 18129–18134 (2004).
McDevitt, T. C., Woodhouse, K. A., Hauschka, S. D., Murry, C. E. & Stayton, P. S. Spatially organized layers of cardiomyocytes on biodegradable polyurethane films for myocardial repair. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 66, 586–595 (2003).
Kim, D. H. et al. Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 565–570 (2010).
Bryant, D. M. & Mostov, K. E. From cells to organs: building polarized tissue. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 887–901 (2008).
Bettinger, C. J., Kulig, K. M., Vacanti, J. P., Langer, R. & Borenstein, J. T. Nanofabricated collagen-inspired synthetic elastomers for primary rat hepatocyte culture. Tissue Eng. A 15, 1321–1329 (2009).
Feng, Z. Q. et al. The effect of nanofibrous galactosylated chitosan scaffolds on the formation of rat primary hepatocyte aggregates and the maintenance of liver function. Biomaterials 30, 2753–2763 (2009).
Chan, C. K. et al. Biomimetic nanocomposites for bone graft applications. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 1, 177–188 (2006).
Sachlos, E., Gotora, D. & Czernuszka, J. T. Collagen scaffolds reinforced with biomimetic composite nano-sized carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite crystals and shaped by rapid prototyping to contain internal microchannels. Tissue Eng. 12, 2479–2487 (2006).
Zhang, Y. et al. Enhanced biomineralization in osteoblasts on a novel electrospun biocomposite nanofibrous substrate of hydroxyapatite/collagen/chitosan. Tissue Eng. A 16, 1949–1960 (2010).
Bhattacharyya, S. et al. Biodegradable polyphosphazene-nanohydroxyapatite composite nanofibres: scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 5, 69–75 (2009).
Zhang, L. et al. Biologically inspired rosette nanotubes and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite hydrogel nanocomposites as improved bone substitutes. Nanotechnology 20, 175101 (2009).
Roohani-Esfahani, S. I., Nouri-Khorasani, S., Lu, Z., Appleyard, R. & Zreiqat, H. The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite–PCL composites. Biomaterials 31, 5498–5509 (2010).
Suhr, J. et al. Fatigue resistance of aligned carbon nanotube arrays under cyclic compression. Nature Nanotech. 2, 417–421 (2007).
Wang, S. F., Shen, L., Zhang, W. D. & Tong, Y. J. Preparation and mechanical properties of chitosan/carbon nanotubes composites. Biomacromolecules 6, 3067–3072 (2005).
Mattson, M. P., Haddon, R. C. & Rao, A. M. Molecular functionalization of carbon nanotubes and use as substrates for neuronal growth. J. Mol. Neuro. 14, 175–182 (2000).
Hu, H., Ni, Y. C., Montana, V., Haddon, R. C. & Parpura, V. Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes as substrates for neuronal growth. Nano Lett. 4, 507–511 (2004).
Lovat, V. et al. Carbon nanotube substrates boost neuronal electrical signaling. Nano Lett. 5, 1107–1110 (2005).
Massobrio, G., Massobrio, P. & Martinoia, S. Modeling the neuron–carbon nanotube–ISFET junction to investigate the electrophysiological neuronal activity. Nano Lett. 8, 4433–4440 (2008).
Mazzatenta, A. et al. Interfacing neurons with carbon nanotubes: Electrical signal transfer and synaptic stimulation in cultured brain circuits. J. Neurosci. 27, 6931–6936 (2007).
Cellot, G. et al. Carbon nanotubes might improve neuronal performance by favouring electrical shortcuts. Nature Nanotech. 4, 126–133 (2009). The authors suggest a mechanism for how carbon nanotubes affect the collective electrical activity of neuronal networks in vitro.
Gui, X. et al. Soft, highly conductive nanotube sponges and composites with controlled compressibility. ACS Nano 4, 2320–2326 (2010).
Bianco, A. et al. Microstructure and cytocompatibility of electrospun nanocomposites based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and carbon nanostructures. Int. J. Artif. Organs 33, 271–282 (2010).
Heo, S. J. et al. In vitro and animal study of novel nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(epsilon-caprolactone) composite scaffolds fabricated by layer manufacturing process. Tissue Eng. A 15, 977–989 (2009).
Pek, Y. S., Gao, S., Arshad, M. S., Leck, K. J. & Ying, J. Y. Porous collagen–apatite nanocomposite foams as bone regeneration scaffolds. Biomaterials 29, 4300–4305 (2008).
Wu, S. L. et al. A biomimetic hierarchical scaffold: natural growth of nanotitanates on three-dimensional microporous Ti-based metals. Nano Lett. 8, 3803–3808 (2008).
Zhang, S. F. & Uludag, H. Nanoparticulate systems for growth factor delivery. Pharm. Res. 26, 1561–1580 (2009).
Fan, D. et al. Subcellular-resolution delivery of a cytokine through precisely manipulated nanowires. Nature Nanotech. 5, 545–551 (2010).
Alsberg, E., Feinstein, E., Joy, M. P., Prentiss, M. & Ingber, D. E. Magnetically-guided self-assembly of fibrin matrices with ordered nano-scale structure for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 12, 3247–3256 (2006).
Ito, A., Ino, K., Kobayashi, T. & Honda, H. The effect of RGD peptide-conjugated magnetite cationic liposomes on cell growth and cell sheet harvesting. Biomaterials 26, 6185–6193 (2005).
Ito, A. et al. Novel methodology for fabrication of tissue-engineered tubular constructs using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force. Tissue Eng. 11, 1553–1561 (2005).
Pislaru, S. V. et al. Magnetic forces enable rapid endothelialization of synthetic vascular grafts. Circulation 114, I314–I318 (2006).
Souza, G. R. et al. Three-dimensional tissue culture based on magnetic cell levitation. Nature Nanotech. 5, 291–296 (2010). The authors show a culture system in which the geometry and cell mass can be manipulated by spatially controlling the magnetic field.
Keefer, E. W., Botterman, B. R., Romero, M. I., Rossi, A. F. & Gross, G. W. Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings. Nature Nanotech. 3, 434–439 (2008).
Zhou, X. J., Moran-Mirabal, J. M., Craighead, H. G. & McEuen, P. L. Supported lipid bilayer/carbon nanotube hybrids. Nature Nanotech. 2, 185–190 (2007).
Pappas, T. C. et al. Nanoscale engineering of a cellular interface with semiconductor nanoparticle films for photoelectric stimulation of neurons. Nano Lett. 7, 513–519 (2007).
Timko, B. P., Cohen-Karni, T., Qing, Q., Tian, B. Z. & Lieber, C. M. Design and implementation of functional nanoelectronic interfaces with biomolecules, cells, and tissue using nanowire device arrays. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 9, 269–280 (2010).
Patolsky, F. et al. Detection, stimulation, and inhibition of neuronal signals with high-density nanowire transistor arrays. Science 313, 1100–1104 (2006).
Eschermann, J. F. et al. Action potentials of HL-1 cells recorded with silicon nanowire transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 083703 (2009).
Cohen-Karni, T., Timko, B. P., Weiss, L. E. & Lieber, C. M. Flexible electrical recording from cells using nanowire transistor arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7309–7313 (2009).
Cohen-Karni, T., Qing, Q., Li, Q., Fang, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Graphene and nanowire transistors for cellular interfaces and electrical recording. Nano Lett. 10, 1098–1102 (2010).
Timko, B. P. et al. Electrical recording from hearts with flexible nanowire device arrays. Nano Lett. 9, 914–918 (2009).
Qing, Q. et al. Nanowire transistor arrays for mapping neural circuits in acute brain slices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1882–1887 (2010).
Kim, D-H. et al. Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nature Mater. 9, 511–517 (2010).
Bettinger, C. J. & Bao, Z. A. Organic thin-film transistors fabricated on resorbable biomaterial substrates. Adv. Mater. 22, 651–655 (2010).
Tian, B. Z., Xie, P., Kempa, T. J., Bell, D. C. & Lieber, C. M. Single-crystalline kinked semiconductor nanowire superstructures. Nature Nanotech. 4, 824–829 (2009).
Tian, B. et al. Three-dimensional, flexible nanoscale field-effect transistors as localized bioprobes. Science 329, 830–834 (2010). This article describes a nanoscale field-effect transistor cell probe that is capable of observing and monitoring the intracellular signals of living electrogenic cells.
Lim, D. K., Jeon, K. S., Kim, H. M., Nam, J. M. & Suh, Y. D. Nanogap-engineerable Raman-active nanodumbbells for single-molecule detection. Nature Mater. 9, 60–67 (2010).
Heller, D. A. et al. Multimodal optical sensing and analyte specificity using single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature Nanotech. 4, 114–120 (2009).
Barone, P. W. et al. Modulation of single-walled carbon nanotube photoluminescence by hydrogel swelling. ACS Nano 3, 3869–3877 (2009).
Farokhzad, O. C. & Langer, R. Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS Nano 3, 16–20 (2009).
Riehemann, K. et al. Nanomedicine—challenge and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 872–897 (2009).
Kunzmann, A. et al. Toxicology of engineered nanomaterials: Focus on biocompatibility, biodistribution and biodegradation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.007 (2010). This article describes the interaction between engineered nanomaterials and biological systems and may help in designing safer and more compatible nanomaterials for future applications in medicine.
Zaveri, T. D. et al. Contributions of surface topography and cytotoxicity to the macrophage response to zinc oxide nanorods. Biomaterials 31, 2999–3007 (2010).
Mallouk, T. E. & Sen, A. Powering nanorobots. Sci. Am. 300, 72–77 (2009).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants DE13023, DE016516, EB006365 and R01GM073626, and NSF grant BES-0609182. T.D. acknowledges a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the American Heart Association. B.P.T. acknowledges a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award from the NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences. We thank S. Cohen, S. McAllister and B. Tian for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
R.L. has a financial interest in Pervasis and Fibrocell Science, Inc.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dvir, T., Timko, B., Kohane, D. et al. Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. Nature Nanotech 6, 13–22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.246
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.246