Abstract
Binding of molecules, ions or proteins to small target sites is a generic step of cell activation. This process relies on rare stochastic events where a particle located in a large bulk has to find small and often hidden targets. We present here a hybrid discrete-continuum model that takes into account a stochastic regime governed by rare events and a continuous regime in the bulk. The rare discrete binding events are modeled by a Markov chain for the encounter of small targets by few Brownian particles, for which the arrival time is Poissonian. The large ensemble of particles is described by mass action laws. We use this novel model to predict the time distribution of vesicular release at neuronal synapses. Vesicular release is triggered by the binding of few calcium ions that can originate either from the synaptic bulk or from the entry through calcium channels. We report here that the distribution of release time is bimodal although it is triggered by a single fast action potential. While the first peak follows a stimulation, the second corresponds to the random arrival over much longer time of ions located in the synaptic terminal to small binding vesicular targets. To conclude, the present multiscale stochastic modeling approach allows studying cellular events based on integrating discrete molecular events over several time scales.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cellular activation is described by the binding of few diffusing molecules to specific small and hidden targets. What is the time scale of a cell response, triggered by rare molecular events? Such a process requires exploring microdomains at a nanometer precision. Examples are vesicular fusion triggered by the binding of calcium ions, detection of a morphogen concentration by a growth cone, molecular events underlying the induction of synaptic plasticity at neuronal synapses or activating cellular check points where molecular events are transformed into a cellular decision.
Traditional chemical kinetics1 are based on mass-action laws or reaction-diffusion equations, but this is a deficient description of stochastic chemical reactions in micro-domains, where only a small number of molecules are involved2,3,4. Several models were developed to describe stochastic reactions, such as Markov reaction-diffusion equations based on the joint probability distribution for the concentration of bound and unbound reactants, leading to coupled systems of reaction-diffusion5. Another direction involves the Narrow Escape Theory5 to coarse-grain the binding and unbinding reactions to the time scale of diffusing reactant in and out of a binding site. This approach reduces the classical reaction-diffusion approach to a Markovian jump process description of the stochastic dynamics for the binding and unbinding of molecules. The Markovian approximation1,6 can be used for example to obtain predictions for the rate of molecular dynamics underlying spindle assembly checkpoint during cell division7 or the probability that a messenger RNA escapes degradation through binding a certain number of microRNAs. The Markovian approach can also be used to compute the mean time the number of bound molecules reaches a threshold, called the mean time to threshold theory (MTT), for characterizing the stability of activation6.
However, none of the approaches described above have been used to model the interaction between a large bath of particles modeled by a continuous dynamic and a stochastic dynamic induced by rare events where few particles bind to small targets to trigger a response.
The goal of this report is to introduce a novel hybrid model and to provide an application to synaptic physiology for computing the probability of vesicular release following calcium influx. Calcium ions induce vesicular release when few of them accumulate underneath a vesicle. This accumulation can follow the direct influx at a short time scale or can be due to ions originating from the pre-synaptic terminal with a longer time scale. In all cases, triggering a vesicle release is a rare molecular event described as the accumulation of few ions at a single protein location8. However, due to instrumental limitations, it is not yet possible to measure calcium dynamics at a nanometer level at neuronal synapses. Yet, synchronous and asynchronous synaptic release might depend on calcium dynamics and we provide here several predictions using the present hybrid stochastic model of chemical reactions, that we compare to Gillespie simulations. The proposed mechanism of asynchronous vesicular release that we found here clarifies the role of calcium ions during short-term synaptic plasticity9.
Results
Hybrid Markov-mass action model
Reactant molecules R are modeled as Brownian particles, entering a domain Ω through localized point sources with an inward flux J(t) at each single source. The entering Brownian particles can reach any target site to activate them. After particles enter, they can either hit a small target or reach the bulk, where they are lost in the undifferentiated state consisting in many particles. In the bulk, the reactant particles R can either interact with a substrate S, leave the bulk with a rate kes or bind a target site with rate kT, as shown in Fig. 1. The arrival of T particles at a single target is the event that we are interested in, as it models a cellular activation from a molecular event. As we shall see here, the Brownian reactant particles and the small targets can be described by a coarse-grained model, where the mass action description (for the continuum limit) is coupled to a finite state Markov chain (Fig. 1).
For the application to vesicular release described in the second part, the bulk represents the pre-synaptic terminal (Fig. 2A), and NT the number of small target sites (red ribbon in Fig. 2B) hidden underneath a ball representing a vesicle.
The flux J(t) of particles enters the domain at a source point x. The entering particles can reach a small target with a splitting probability ps(x) or go to the bulk with probability 1 − ps. A particle entered at point x that reaches one of the NT target sites, will reach specifically site i with probability q(x, i), for i = 1..NT (see the Methods section for the description). Thus the flux of ions arriving at a target site i is the sum of the conditional fluxes over the ensemble of point source locations :
We recall that the splitting probability ps(x) for a Brownian particle to reach the small ribbon below a ball (Fig. 2B) before entering the bulk, when balls are distributed on a square lattice, has been estimated previously using conformal mapping methods and asymptotic approximations10:
where r is the size of the ball, H is half the distance between two targets, A = 9.8, ρ(x) is the distance between the point source and the closest target site, and ε is the height of the ribbon representing the target site. This probability accounts for the particular geometry of the target and depends on the relative distance between the targets and the source points10.
So far, we discussed the direct arrival of a particle from a point source. We now consider the arrival of a Brownian particle coming from the bulk to one of the small targets. This arrival to a small ribbon (red in Fig. 2B) is Poissonian with a rate (computed in ref. 10)
where D is the particle diffusion coefficient.
We shall now present the set of equations that describe the arrival of a few number of particles to the target either coming directly from the point source or from the bulk. For each target site i and for a given distribution P of source points, the probability Pri{k, t} that k particles are bound at time t is computed from a Markov model: once a particle binds to a target, it cannot unbind, and thus the transition probability from the states k − 1 to k (bound particles), between t and t + Δt, is due to the fluxes of particles from the point sources and from the bulk:
where represents the arrival rate of particles to the target:
The first term in the right-end side of the rate equation 5 represents the cumulative flux of particles reaching target site i summed over all point sources. It represents the amount of particles reaching target i directly after their entry through a source point. The second term kTNf (t) represents the fraction of particles originating from the bulk that will bind to the target sites. Here Nf (t) is the number of free particles at time t in the bulk, and kT is the arrival rate of particles located in the bulk. The rate kT is computed using the Mean First Passage Time theory10, and when the target size is small compared to the size of the bulk, the binding events are rare and thus can be modeled as Poissonian rate which is the reciprocal of the mean first time for a particle to reach the target5,10. These two terms account for the targets geometry, as well as their relative positions with respect to the source points .
We shall now described the model of activation. A target is considered to be activated when there are exactly T bound particles. We obtain for each target 1 ≤ i ≤ NT, the Markov chain for the probabilities ,
where the final equation for k = T describes the absorbing state for the probability . The initial condition at time t = 0 is
and the normalization condition is
We can now introduce the time to a threshold T for target i, when the distribution of point source is . This time corresponds to the first time that there are exactly T particles at target i. It is also the last passage time of a particle when T − 1 particles are already at the binding sites. The distribution of time is called the activation time for the target i and is given by
hence the probability density function of the activation time is defined by
and the mean release time is thus
To conclude this section, we have presented here a Markov chain that counts exactly T binding events. We note that the particles originate from two sources: either from the bulk or a transient influx. We shall introduce in the next section a new set of equations to couple the Markov chain and the density of free particles Nf (t) that can further interact with a varying population of substrates S.
The mass action law equations for reactant particles interacting with a substrate in the bulk
The reactant particles in the bulk can interact with a substrate according to the chemical reaction
where k−1 (resp. k0) is the backward (resp. forward) rate. We determine the mass-action equations for the number of free Nf (t), and bound Nb (t) particles. The total number of substrate sites Stot is fixed, and at time t, the number of available sites is Stot − Nb(t). The particles can escape the domain Ω at a Poissonnian rate kes, and bind to a target site with a rate kT. We note that the probability that target i is free, i.e. not activated, is given by
In summary, Nf and Nb satisfy the mass action equations:
The first two terms in the first equation represent the classical unbinding and binding of molecules to buffers. The third term represents the fraction of particles directly entering the bulk from the initial influx. The fourth term corresponds to particles that leave the bulk or bind to a free target (we assume that the escape rate kes is fast compared to the binding rates). Finally the last term accounts for the release into the bulk of the T particles bound to a target, following the target activation. Indeed, after activation, the T bound particles are released into the bulk, leading to an increase of the free particles Nf by a jump event of T particles (Eq. 10). The second equation is the classical mass action law for the number of bound buffers.
Interestingly, the system of equations 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 can be decoupled and resolved. We use a direct integration between t0 and t for the probability and then inductively derive all probabilities . Starting with equations 6, we get
The solutions can then be directly injected into the mass action system 14. To conclude, equations 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 involve the coupling of the probability to the mass action equations and the ensemble constitutes a coupled set of Markov-mass action equations, that describes the cumulative binding of T particles, interpreted as activation.
We shall now provide an application to neurobiology about calcium signaling at single neuronal synapses. There are indeed 1011 neurons in a human brain, and each has a mean of 103 synapses. Synapses are thought to code part of the memory, mainly by modulating the neuronal response through time variations in the release of vesicles. We will study now some aspects of the stochastic release of a vesicle from the accumulation of T = 5 calcium ions to key proteins. This example illustrates the theory presented above in the context of synaptic activation from rare molecular binding events.
Dynamics of vesicular release at neuronal synapse
The pre-synaptic terminal of a neuronal cell contains a large amount of vesicles that can be randomly released following an action potential, characterized by a release probability11. However, the release mechanism is not well understood and computing the release probability remains a challenge12,13,14,15. The mechanism is described as follows: after an action potential invades the pre-synaptic terminal, voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) open, leading to a calcium influx into the pre-synaptic domain8,16,17. When several diffusing calcium ions have succeeded to find small molecular targets, which form a complex of molecular machinery (such as synaptotagmin and any other key molecules) located underneath a vesicle, these molecules are changing their conformation, activating the fusion of the vesicle with the cell membrane and thus triggering the release of neurotransmitters11. This is a key step of neuronal communication.
At the same time, calcium ions can bind and unbind to buffer molecules located in the bulk of the pre-synaptic terminal, or exit at the end of the terminal. The success of vesicular release depends on rare events: the arrival of diffusing calcium ions to the small target molecules18,19,20. Ions are either coming directly from the initial entering calcium flux or from ions located the bulk. Vesicular release also depend on the relative position between vesicles and the VGCCs and on their organization on the surface10.
To investigate the time distribution of vesicular release triggered by an accumulation of T = 5 calcium ions at a ribbon (Fig. 2B), we solved numerically the system of ODE Eqs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 using Matlab (see the Methods section for the description).
The initial influx of calcium ions through a VGCC J(t) is simulated using a simplified Hodgkin-Huxley model for calcium current21: the membrane voltage depolarizes following an action potential, modeled by a transient current Iapp(t). The induced calcium current lasts 2.75 ms, with a maximal value of ICa,max = 36.2 nA (Fig. 3A). The total charge Q = 0.025 fC corresponds to an entry of 80 calcium ions (Methods section). We consider that vesicles are located on a square lattice and that channels are uniformly distributed. The probabilities q(x, i) are estimated numerically using Brownian simulations (Methods section). All parameters used for the simulations are described in Table 1.
To confirm the result of this novel Markov-mass action model (red curves in Fig. 3B), we propose an alternative approach using a Gillespie algorithm based on Poissonian rates. The Gillespie’s simulations track rare binding events to small targets, which is well approximated by single exponential distribution the rate of which is the mean first binding time22. Due to the small size of the binding sites compared to the volume of the domain (Table 1), the motion of calcium ions in the bulk -the binding on the SNARE Complex, the binding on buffers an the escape from the domain- can all be approximated by a rate process, computed from the Narrow Escape Theory10,23. This approximations allows us to use the Gillespie algorithm (blue traces in Fig. 3B), using the rates presented in Table 1 (see the Methods section for a description). We found that the two models quite different in nature agree together (Fig. 3B).
When there are no buffers in the bulk (Fig. 3B), the time distribution of vesicular release is bimodal with two consecutive stages: a short time period following the immediate entrance of calcium ions. In that case, vesicular release is triggered by ions that are directly coming from the channel influx. The second regime characterized by a broader peak is induced by the random arrival of calcium ions from the bulk to the target sites, until T sites per vesicle are occupied. The large release time distribution is due to the long time scale of arrival for ions that could be bound and need to diffuse to the small targets. Using formula 3, we obtain for a volume of 1 μm3, D = 20 μm2/s and ε = 0.001 μm, a mean time . This time scale is much longer than the initial calcium transient from the channels and explains the long residual effect of calcium on vesicular release.
To further clarify the origin of the residual (second) peak, we tested numerically the effect of considering buffers in the synaptic bulk at various concentrations. Their role is to buffer the calcium ions in the bulk. We found that increasing the number of buffers abolishes the second peak (Fig. 3B–D), confirming that it is due to the arrival of free calcium ions located in the bulk.
We conclude this report with the following prediction: the diffusion time course in the bulk (which is modeled as a ball of radius 600 nm), where target binding sites are located underneath vesicles of size 20 nm leads to a residual vesicular release that peaks around 60 ms. However, in the case of a high buffer concentration, because the mean unbinding time to buffer is 1/k−1 = 2 s, at the time scale of tens of ms most ions are still buffered and the second peak disappears (Fig. 3C,D) (the escape rate is 1/kes = 0.7 s). However, we can still observe rare events in the distribution tail due to the arrival of free ions from the bulk.
Discussion and Conclusion
We presented here a hybrid model that connect a Markov process to a mass action model called the Markov-mass action model. The aim is to study the coupling between a continuum ensemble of particles that participate into a small number of rare events, representing the binding of a small and finite tiny subset of these Brownian molecules to small targets. It was already noticed that discrete-state stochastic models for particles are not well approximated by continuum equations24,25. The present model is also quite different from previous numerical simulation efforts to generate a finite number of Brownian trajectories from a continuum ensemble26,27.
To illustrate the applicability of this method, we model vesicular release at synapses from calcium dynamics, where we found a first peak at short time scale (less than 10 ms) induced by the direct entrance of calcium ions, followed by a second peak, which is due to the return of calcium from the bulk to the small hidden targets, a process that also depends on the interaction with buffer molecules and can last hundreds of milliseconds. The emergence of these two phases can possibly explain asynchronous quantal release, without introducing any additional time constant at a molecular level. The present approach could also be used to describe short-term plasticity at a molecular level20,28 and to model the noise inherent to synaptic dynamics29.
Methods
Influx of particles
The initial influx of particles through a channel following an action potential is computed using a simplified Hodgkin-Huxley model. The membrane depolarization following an action potential is modeled using an applied current Iapp = 50 mV during 1 ms. The equations are summarized below
where
The initial values V0, n0, m0, h0 are the equilibrium solutions of the ODE. They are summarized with all the parameters in Table 2. The induced calcium current lasts 2.75 ms, with a peak value ICa,max = 36.2 nA (Fig. 3A).
Numerical estimation of the splitting probability between targets
In this section, we describe the numerical simulations that we used to estimate the probability to distributed an ions among one of the NT target sites (vesicles), distributed on a square lattice. There exactly Nc source points (channels) distributed in a square S of length 2H near the targets10 (Fig. 4A,B and Table 1).
After particles either enter the bulk or bind to one of the targets. In the latter case, using Brownian simulations we determined the target. For that, we subdivide each square S into 8 sub-triangles (si)i=1...8 (Fig. 4B). Using symmetry we restrict our analysis to triangle s1. For a point source x ∈ s1 (Fig. 4B), we estimate the probability q(x, i1) that the entering particle binds to the closest target i1, (blue in Fig. 4B), to the second closest i2, q(x, i2) (green or magenta) and so on, with respect to the distance dist(x) to the closest vesicle. The normalization identity is
The exact numerical procedure is the following: To compute the distribution q(x, i), we further decompose the triangle s1 into blocks parameterized by polar coordinates (ρk, θk)k. We generated 200 runs for each block k and fitted the results using a routine procedure in Matlab (Fig. 4, the color code in B and C are the same). We neglect the probability to bind to the 5th-closest target and anyone further away. This numerical result allows to compute the probability q(x, i) to reach specifically the target site i, when starting from point x. Finally, the fraction of particles entering through a channel positioned at x, that reaches a target i, is ps(x)q(x, i), and the fraction of flux coming from a channel located at x and arriving to target i is Ji(x, t) = J(t)ps(x)q(x, i).
Mass action model
We solve numerically the coupled system of ODE Eqs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 for different numbers of buffer sites and for a uniform distribution of channels using Matlab and Monte Carlo simulations. For a given number of buffer sites and a given positioning of the Nc channels, we solved the system using a Matlab solver. To get the results for a uniform distribution of channels (Fig. 3B–D), we perform Monte Carlo simulations (150 realizations).
Stochastic simulations based on the Gillespie algorithm
The stochastic model is a Gillespie algorithm based on Poissonian rates. The arrival time of a Brownian particle to a small hole is well approximated by a Poisson process and the rate is the reciprocal of the mean first passage time. In our model, the arrival of a Brownian particle to a small hole can represent binding to buffers, escape from the domain and binding to a target site. We shall now present the rates used in simulations.
The buffers are positioned at independent sites, modeled by small spheres. The mean first arrival time of a Brownian particle to a small spherical target of radius rB in the domain Ω, with diffusion coefficients D for the particle and DB for the buffer, is given by23
The release rate to a buffer site is Poissonian with backward rate k−1 (Table 1). The domain is described in Fig. 2 and consists of a head, of volume |Ωh| and a cylindrical neck with radius rneck and height lneck (Table 1). The escape at the end of the domain is Poissonian, with rate the reciprocal of the mean escape time23, given by
where D is the diffusion coefficient. Finally, the arrival of a particle to a small ribbon (colored in red in Fig. 2B) is Poissonian with rate given in Eq. 3. These arrival times are exponentially distributed with rates equal to the reciprocal of the binding time
when there are Nf independent Brownian particles in the domain, the rate constant for the first binding event is
The conditional probability that a binding event Tb occurs between time t and t + Δt, when there are Nf particles is
After entry through channels, particles either bind to the targets with probability ps Eq. 2, or go to the bulk with probability 1 − ps. Using a Gillespie algorithm and the rates described above, we compute the time course of the number of particles in the bulk Nf, and the time distribution of vesicular release (see also Table 1).
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Guerrier, C. and Holcman, D. Hybrid Markov-mass action law model for cell activation by rare binding events: Application to calcium induced vesicular release at neuronal synapses. Sci. Rep. 6, 35506; doi: 10.1038/srep35506 (2016).
References
Redner, S. A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Holcman, D. & Schuss, Z. Stochastic chemical reactions in microdomains. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 114710 (2005).
Szekely, T. & Burrage, K. Stochastic simulation in systems biology. Computational and structural biotechnology journal 12, 14–25 (2014).
MacNamara, S., Burrage, K. & Sidje, R. B. Multiscale modeling of chemical kinetics via the master equation. MMS 6, 1146–1168 (2008).
Holcman, D. & Schuss, Z. Stochastic Narrow Escape in Molecular and Cellular Biology: Analysis and Applications (Springer-Verlag, NY, 2015).
Dao Duc, K. & Holcman, D. Threshold activation for stochastic chemical reactions in microdomains. Phys. Rev. E. 81, 041107 (2010).
Dao Duc, K. & Holcman, D. Using default constraints of the spindle assembly checkpoints to estimate the associate chemical rates. BMC Biophysics 5, 1–11 (2012).
Rothman, J. & Silver, R. A. Data-driven modeling of synaptic transmission and integration. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 123, 305 (2014).
Huganir, R. L. & Nicoll, R. A. Ampars and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years. Neuron 80, 704–717 (2013).
Guerrier, C. & Holcman, D. Search time for a small ribbon and application to vesicular release at neuronal synapses. MMS 13, 1173–1193 (2015).
Rizzoli, S. O. & Betz, W. J. Synaptic vesicle pools. Nat Rev Neurosci 6, 57–69 (2005).
Warner, J. M. & O’Shaughnessy, B. The hemifused state on the pathway to membrane fusion. Phys Rev Lett 108, 178101 (2012).
Meinrenken, C. J., Borst, J. G. G. & Sakman, B. Local routes revisited: the space and time dependence of the ca2+ signal for phasic transmitter release at the rat calyx of Held. J Physiol 547, 665–689 (2003).
Dittrich, M. et al. An excess-calcium-binding-site model predicts neurotransmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. Biophys J 104, 2751–2763 (2013).
Matveev, V., Zucker, R. S. & Sherman, A. Facilitation through buffer saturation: constraints on endogenous buffering properties. Biophys J 86, 2691–2709 (2004).
Savtchenko, L. P., Sylantyev, S. & Rusakov, D. A. Central synapses release a resource-efficient amount of glutamate. Nat Neurosci 16, 10–12 (2013).
Volynski, K. E., Rusakov, D. M. & Kullmann, D. A. Presynaptic fluctuations and release-independent depression. Nat Neurosci. 9 (2006).
Klingauf, J. & Neher, E. Modeling buffered ca2+ diffusion near the membrane: implications for secretion in neuroendocrine cells. Biophys J. 72, 674–690 (1997).
Neher, E. & Sakaba, T. Multiple roles of calcium ions in the regulation of neurotransmitter release. Neuron 59, 861–872 (2008).
Keller, D. et al. An exclusion zone for ca2+ channels around docked vesicles explains release control by multiple channels at a CNS synapse. PLOS Comp Biol 11, e1004253 (2015).
Hille, B. Ion channels of excitable membranes, Third Edition (Sinauer Sunderland, MA, 2001).
Schuss, Z., Singer, A. & Holcman, D. The narrow escape problem for diffusion in cellular microdomains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007).
Holcman, D. & Schuss, Z. The narrow escape problem. SIAM Rev 56, 213–257 (2014).
Modchang, C. et al. A comparison of deterministic and stochastic simulations of neuronal vesicle release models. Physical Biology 7, 026008 (2010).
Weinberg, S. H. & Smith, G. D. Discrete-state stochastic models of calcium-regulated calcium influx and subspace dynamics are not well-approximated by ODEs that neglect concentration fluctuations. Comput Math Methods Med 897371 (2012).
Nadler, B., Naeh, T. & Schuss, Z. The stationary arrival process of independent diffusers from a continuum to an absorbing boundary is Poissonian. SIAM J. Appl. Math 62, 433–447 (2001).
Flegg, M., Chapman, J. & Erban, R. Two regime method for optimizing stochastic reaction-diffusion simulations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9, 859–868 (2012).
Pan, B. & Zucker, R. S. A general model of synaptic transmission and short-term plasticity. Neuron 62, 539–554 (2009).
Zhang, C. & Peskin, C. S. Improved signaling as a result of randomness in synaptic vesicle release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 14954–14959 (2015).
Zhang, W. & Linden, D. J. Neuromodulation at single presynaptic boutons of cerebellar parallel fibers is determined by bouton size and basal action potential-evoked ca transient amplitude. J Neurosci 29 (2009).
Holcman, D., Schuss, Z. & Korkotian, E. Calcium dynamics in dendritic spines and spine motility. Biophys J 87, 81–91 (2004).
Xu-Friedman, M. A., Harris, K. M. & Regehr, W. G. Three-dimensional comparison of ultrastructural characteristics at depressing and facilitating synapses onto cerebellar purkinje cells. J Neurosci 21, 6666–6672 (2001).
Biess, A., Korkotian, E. & Holcman, D. Barriers to diffusion in dendrites and estimation of calcium spread following synaptic inputs. PLoS Comput Biol 7, e1002182 (2011).
Acknowledgements
D.H. is thanks the Mathematical Institute, Oxford OX26GG, UK and Newton Institute at Cambridge for hospitality.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both author contributed equally to the manuscript for the figures, text and science. D.H. and C.G. wrote the main manuscript text and D.H. and C.G. prepared Figures 1–3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Guerrier, C., Holcman, D. Hybrid Markov-mass action law model for cell activation by rare binding events: Application to calcium induced vesicular release at neuronal synapses. Sci Rep 6, 35506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35506
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35506
This article is cited by
-
A first-passage approach to diffusion-influenced reversible binding and its insights into nanoscale signaling at the presynapse
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Perineuronal nets decrease membrane capacitance of peritumoral fast spiking interneurons in a model of epilepsy
Nature Communications (2018)
-
Electrodiffusion phenomena in neuroscience: a neglected companion
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.