Abstract
A deeper understanding of the risk factors for dystocia and stillbirth could help farmers make decisions about dairy cow management. The objectives of this study were to investigate cow-level risk factors associated with dystocia and stillbirth in a relatively large sample of dairy cows using multivariable linear regression models. The data consisted of 51,405 calving records of 14,546 Holstein cows from 3 dairy herds in Isfahan Province, Iran, collected between April 2011 and September 2017. To investigate the association between selected blood macro-minerals and the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth, blood samples were collected at the time of parturition from a random subset of these cows, which included 1311 animals. The incidence of dystocia and stillbirths averaged 14.7% and 4.3%, respectively. Results showed that calving year, calving season, dry period length, BCS, parity, calf sex, calf birth weight, twin status, and stillbirth were significantly associated with the incidence of dystocia. According to the Random Forest (RF) classifier, we found that dry period length, calf birth weight, and parity were the most important cow-level risk factors for the incidence of dystocia. Calving year, calving season, parity, twin status, dry period length, calf birth weight, calf sex, and dystocia were significantly associated with the incidence of stillbirths. The most important risk factors identified by the RF classifier for stillbirths were twin status, parity, dry period length, and calf birth weight. Also, interactions between the cow-level risk factors associated with dystocia and stillbirth were identified. The incidence of dystocia was associated with the interactions of twin status × calf birth weight and twin status × stillbirth. According to our analysis, the incidence of stillbirth is caused by interactions among several factors, such as twin status × length of dry period, twin status × calving season, and twin status × parity. The highest incidence of dystocia (21.3%) and stillbirths (5.4%) was observed in hypo-calcemic cows. In conclusion, twin status seems to be a determining factor for the incidence of stillbirths but not for dystocia. Finally, the results of this study may help the dairy industry make management decisions aimed at reducing dystocia and stillbirth rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Parturition is a critical time in the life cycle of dairy cows and calves. Dystocia and stillbirth are two common disorders that affect the production and reproductive performance of dairy cows1,2,3 and cause substantial economic consequences3,4. Dystocia is defined as difficult calving due to prolonged parturition or severe assisted parturition5. The incidence of dystocia in the United States ranges from 9.5 to 13.2% in primiparous cows and from 5.0 to 6.6% in multiparous cows from 1985 to 19966. The prevalence of dystocia has been reported to be 8.2% in Iranian Holstein dairy cows1. According to Wall et al.7, 16.0% of cows in the United Kingdom require assistance during calving, and the prevalence of dystocia is estimated to be 1.5% to 22.0% worldwide8. The differences in dystocia incidence in the population of cows from different studies/countries are generally known8,9 and are highly dependent on calving management and the case definition of dystocia10. In the published literature, dystocia is often described as calving difficulty, level of assistance during calving, and ease of calving, ranging from routine to non-routine (i.e., fetal malpresentation or intervention during dystocia)8. Some reports classify dystocia using dystocia scores of 1–5, whereas other reports refer only to assisted calving, regardless of the type of assistance used (e.g., cesarean section or pulling a large calf). Therefore, the existence of an international agreement on the definition of dystocia would make studies more comparable.
Stillbirth is defined as the death of a calf that occurs after at least 260 days of gestation just before, during, or within 24 to 48 h after parturition11,12. Stillbirths often result in impaired reproductive and milk production as well as dam survival13,14,15 so economic losses from stillbirths are not limited to the value of the stillborn calf15. In a study that included 104,572 calving events from 16 dairy herds in Iran, the prevalence of stillbirths was reported to range from 2.9 to 9.8% (average 4.9%)16. Recently, Mahnani et al.,3 reported that the incidence of stillbirths in Iranian Holstein cows was 4.2% (range 3.4% to 6.8%). In the cohort of Japanese Black cattle, Uematsu et al.,17 found that prematurity and excessive fetal weight, as well as primiparity and low temperatures in winter, were the risk factors for stillbirth and dystocia. There is evidence that stillbirths reduce 305-day milk production, increase the number of inseminations in primiparous cows, contribute to a higher culling rate due to lower milk production and poor reproductive performance, and reduce the probability of conception18,19,20,21,22.
Dystocia and stillbirth may be caused by either maternal, fetal factors, or a combination of both8. In most cases, dystocia is the result of abnormalities in fetal presentation, position, or posture, but it may also be caused by fetal oversize, pelvic abnormalities, or uterine inertia10. Fetopelvic disproportion is a primary cause of dystocia in heifers, while fetal maldispositions are a major cause in pluriparous cows8. Also, the prevalence of fetal malposition has been reported to range from 1.0 to 51.0% in beef cattle23. A previous study with data from several breeds found that cows with twin birth had a higher likelihood of dystocia and stillbirths than cows with single births24. The stillbirth rates in Holstein herds have previously been found to be between 3.2 and 5.4% for single births, and between 12.9 and 15.7% for twin births25,26. Twin birth in dairy cows are generally undesirable, and estimated losses from twin calving in dairy cows range from $59 to $161 per twin pregnancy27. The association between twin status and the incidence of dystocia was inconsistent across studies. Some studies reported a higher incidence of dystocia28 while others reported a lower incidence of dystocia in single birth compared with twin birth29. Echternkamp and Gregory29 attributed the higher incidence of dystocia in twin birth compared with single birth (46.9% versus 20.6%) primarily to the abnormal presentation (37.0% versus 4.5%) of one or both twin calves at parturition. The occurrence of twin pregnancies in dairy cows with high milk production is most likely caused by multiple ovulations and low circulating levels of progesterone30.
Dystocia is often the primary cause but accounts for only about 50% of stillbirths31. As stated in a recent study32, control of the age of the first calving is an essential management tool to achieve lower dystocia risk and higher lactation performance in dairy cows. Twin pregnancy could increase the incidence of dystocia, the incidence of freemartinism, the overall risk of culling and perinatal mortality, and decrease calf birth weight, milk production, and cow fertility27.
Studies have demonstrated a relationship between metabolic profile and reproductive disorders33,34. According to Heuwieser et al.35 and Hudson et al.36, dystocia was associated with higher blood cortisol levels. In another study, Vannucchi et al.37 reported that blood glucose concentrations were higher in cows who experienced dystocia compared to cows with no dystocia (n = 10/group). A mineral imbalance has an important effect on the reproductive physiology of dairy cows38,39, resulting in reduced reproductive efficiency. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between blood macro-minerals and the incidence of stillbirths and dystocia in dairy cows. Cows with prolonged or delayed subclinical hypocalcemia are more susceptible to disease and produce less milk than cows with normal postpartum plasma calcium (Ca) concentrations40,41. A previous study reported that cows that experienced dystocia (n = 22) had lower plasma Ca concentrations 24 h after calving than their normal counterparts (n = 25)42. Nevertheless, the sample sizes of previous studies investigating the association between blood parameters during parturition, dystocia, and stillbirths were relatively small.
Using multivariable linear regression models, the objectives of this study were to identify cow-level risk factors associated with the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth in a relatively large sample of dairy cows. In addition to logistic regression analysis, we used feature importance in Random Forest (RF) classifier for identifying the most important cow-level risk factors that contribute most strongly to the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth. As a second objective, we examined selected macro-minerals in blood at the time of parturition in relation to dystocia and stillbirth in mineral-deficient vs. normal cows.
Results
This study focused on large industrial dairy herds in Isfahan Province, Iran. A summary of the data is provided in Table 1. To ensure the integrity of the data and to avoid inconsistencies among the herds studied, traits were categorized based on their most common definitions, as shown in Table 2. Figure 1 shows a causal web illustrating the main effects and interactions among cow-level factors associated with the incidence of dystocia and stillbirths using the results of multivariable logistic regression models.
A causal diagram illustrating the main effects and interactions among cow-level factors associated with the incidence of dystocia and stillbirths using the results of multivariable logistic regression models. The Figure was designed by BioRender online software (https://app.biorender.com).
Cow-level risk factors of dystocia
Calving number and percentage of stillbirths for variables included in the binary logistic regression model of the generalized linear mixed model for cow-level risk factors for dystocia incidence are shown in Table 3. Estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence levels (CI) of the risk factors are shown in Supplemental Table S1A-B. A mean dystocia incidence of 14.7% was determined. Dystocia incidence varied across calving years (P < 0.01). The lowest (13.7%) and highest (17.2%) dystocia incidence was recorded in calving years 2016 (OR = 1.00) and 2015 (OR = 1.34), respectively. The incidence of dystocia varied by season (within 10% significance threshold, P = 0.08), with the lowest and highest incidence of 14.3% and 15.9% recorded in summer (OR = 0.99) and winter (OR = 1.08), respectively. The incidence of dystocia was higher in cows of parity 1 (15.5%; referent) and > 4 (15.1%; OR = 0.86) than in the other parities (P < 0.01). An association was found between dry period length and dystocia incidence (P < 0.01). Cows with dry period lengths between 45 and 60 days (OR = 0.47) had the lowest incidence (10.8%). Dystocia incidence increased with increasing dry period length. Additionally, gestational length affected the incidence of dystocia (P < 0.01). The incidence of dystocia was higher for male (OR = 1.36) than female (referent) calves (17.6%: male vs. 11.7%: female; P < 0.01). The incidence of dystocia was higher for overconditioned cows (body condition score, BCS > 3.75; OR = 1.27) than other cows (P < 0.01).
Also, interaction effects of twin status × calf birth weight and twin status × stillbirth were significantly associated with dystocia incidence (Fig. 2, P < 0.01). When cows give birth to twins, calves weighing more than 44 kg at birth are more likely to have dystocia (Fig. 2A). The incidence of dystocia in cows that gave birth to stillborn calves was higher in twins than in singletons (Fig. 2B).
Interaction effects of twin status × calf birth weight (A) and twin status × stillbirth (B) were significantly associated with dystocia incidence.
Selected blood macro-minerals
Calving number and percentage of stillbirths for selected blood macro-minerals at parturition included in the binary logistic regression model of the generalized linear mixed model for dystocia incidence are shown in Table 4. Estimated OR and 95% CI of selected blood macro-minerals at the time of parturition that were associated with the incidence of dystocia are shown in Supplemental Table S2. Blood concentrations of Ca (P = 0.02) and P (within 10% significance threshold, P = 0.09) at the time of parturition that were associated with the incidence of dystocia. The highest incidence of dystocia was observed in cows with hypocalcemia (≤ 8 mg/dL) and hypophosphatemia (≤ 4 mg/dL) at the time of parturition. Blood concentrations of magnesium (Mg) at the time of parturition were not significantly associated with the incidence of dystocia.
Cow-level risk factors of stillbirth
Calving number and percentage of stillbirths for variables included in the binary logistic regression model of the generalized linear mixed model for cow-level risk factors for stillbirth incidence are shown in Table 5. Estimated OR and 95% CI of the risk factors for stillbirth incidence are shown in Supplemental Table S3A–D. A mean stillbirth incidence of 4.3% was determined. Stillbirth incidence varied across calving years (P < 0.01). The lowest (3.2%) and highest (5.3%) incidence of stillbirths was recorded in calving years 2016 (OR = 0.37) and 2012 (OR = 1.02), respectively. Additionally, gestational length affected the incidence of stillbirths (P < 0.01). The incidence of stillbirths was higher (P = 0.02) for males (OR = 1.16) than for female (referent) calves (4.1%: male calves vs. 4.5%: female calves. The incidence of stillbirths was higher with dystocia (P < 0.01; OR = 2.04) compared with non-assisted births (9.3% vs. 3.4%, respectively).
Interaction effects of parity × twin status, dry period length × twin status, and calving time × twin status and calving time × calf birth weight were significantly associated with the incidence of stillbirths (P < 0.01; Fig. 3). In cows that gave birth to twins, the risk of stillbirth was greater for cows with parity > 4 than for other parities (Fig. 3A). Cows with a dry period > 100 days had a higher risk of stillbirth in cows that gave birth to twins (Fig. 3B). Cows calving in summer had a higher rate of stillbirth than in other seasons in cows giving birth to twins (Fig. 3C). In addition, calving in summer may increase the risk of stillbirth when calves are born with low birth weight (≤ 35 kg) (Fig. 3D).
Interaction effects of parity × twin status (A), dry period length × twin status (B) and calving season × twin status (C) and calving season × calf birth weight (D) were significantly associated with the incidence of stillbirth.
Selected blood macro-minerals
Calving number and percentage of stillbirths for selected blood macro-minerals at parturition included in the binary logistic regression model of the generalized linear mixed model for stillbirth incidence are shown in Table 6. Estimated OR and 95% CI of selected blood macro-minerals at the time of parturition that were associated the incidence of stillbirths are shown in Supplemental Table S4. Blood concentrations of Ca at the time of parturition that were associated with the incidence of stillbirths (P = 0.01). The highest incidence of stillbirths was observed in cows with hypocalcemia (≤ 8 mg/dL) at the time of parturition. Blood concentrations of P and Mg at parturition were not significantly associated with the incidence of stillbirths.
Random forest
Figure 4 shows the cow-level risk factors identified by RF for dystocia (Fig. 4A) and stillbirth (Fig. 4B), ranked by mean decrease accuracy. Figure 4C and D illustrate the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves for dystocia and stillbirth, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.65 (95% CI 0.53–0.76) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.57–0.94) for dystocia and stillbirth, respectively. Based on RF classification models, there were sensitivity and specificity values of 64% and 53% (for dystocia) and 75% and 66% (for stillbirth), respectively. The highest-ranking factors for dystocia were dry period length, calf birth weight, and parity. The highest-ranking factors for stillbirth were twin status, parity, dry period length, and calf birth weight.
Important calf-level risk factors (features) were identified for (A) dystocia and (B) stillbirth by random forest classification in ascending order based on the mean decrease accuracy (n = 51,405). The ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves for the random forest model for dystocia (C) and stillbirth (D).
Discussion
Cow-level risk factors associated with dystocia and stillbirth
A total of 51,405 calving records of 14,546 cows from 3 dairy herds in Isfahan Province (Iran) were evaluated for potential cow-level risk factors associated with dystocia and stillbirths. The incidences of dystocia and stillbirth averaged 14.7% and 4.3%, respectively. The results of the final multivariable logistic regression models were used in this study to test for the main effects and interaction effects of cow-level risk factors associated with the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth in a relatively large sample of dairy cows. The results showed that calving year, calving season, dry period length, BCS, parity, calf sex, calf birth weight, twin status, and stillbirth were significantly associated with dystocia incidence. In addition to logistic regression analysis, we used feature importance in RF classifier for identifying the most important cow-level risk factors that contribute most strongly to the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth. Feature importance in the RF classifier is an effective method to reduce the number of input variables to the most important ones and to maintain the interpretability of the final model43. Using RF, we found that dry period length, calf birth weight, and parity were the most important cow-level risk factors for the incidence of dystocia. Calving year, calving season, parity, twin status, dry period length, calf birth weight, calf sex, and dystocia were significantly associated with stillbirth incidence. The most important risk factors identified by the RF for stillbirths were twin status, parity, dry period length, and birth weight of the calf.
As reported in this study, the incidence of dystocia was lowest in summer and highest in winter, at 14.3% and 15.9%, respectively. When comparing winter and summer calvings, dystocia was more likely to occur during the winter and less likely during the summer, perhaps because in colder winters, blood flow to the uterus increases, leading to a heavier calf44,45,46. Despite this, we found no interaction between calving season, calf birth weight, and dystocia incidence in the present study. Our results are consistent with those obtained previously by Gaafar et al.,47 who found that dystocia was most prevalent in winter and least prevalent in summer in dairy Friesian cows. In regards to the factors mentioned above, dry period length has been associated with the risk of dystocia. We found that a longer dry period was associated with a higher incidence of dystocia, and cows with a long dry period of more than 100 days had the highest incidence, whereas cows with a shorter dry period between 46 and 60 days had the lowest incidence. Similar results were reported by Atashi et al.2 which reported a more frequent incidence of dystocia in cows with a dry period > 60 days compared to cows with a shorter dry period. In addition, Enevoldsen and Sørensen48, found that dystocia was more likely in cows with long dry period (10 weeks) lengths than in cows with a dry period of 4 to 7 weeks. Consistent with this, Barkema et al.,49 reported that cows with a long dry period were more likely to have an increased risk of cesarean section. Cows with long dry periods gain excessive body fat during the extended dry period as the cows do not regulate their feed intake according to their physiological needs50. Cows which experience dystocia are more likely to have a higher body condition (more body fat) as a result of their prolonged dry periods. Roche et al.51 reported an increased risk of metabolic disorders associated with an excess body condition at calving. Besides over-conditioning, the long dry period may result in altered Ca metabolism52.
The higher incidence of dystocia in primiparous cows (parity 1) as compared to multiparous cows (parities 2 and 3) observed in the current study, agrees with previous studies53,54. The higher risk of dystocia in primiparous than multiparous cows may be due to feto-pelvic disproportion and abnormal fetal position, and uterine inertia in primiparous cows8. In some cases, dystocia may result from the disproportionate size of the fetus with respect to the pelvic area of the dam55 and may be influenced by the birth weight of the calf. In this study, male calves were more likely to cause dystocia than female calves, with is in line with previous reports1,56. We observed that male calves with a birth weight over 42.7 ± 6 kg (mean ± SD) were larger than female calves with less than 39.5 ± 5 kg (mean ± SD). In this study, a higher risk of dystocia was observed in cows that gave birth to male calves than in cows that gave birth to female calves. A part of this could be due to the fact that male calves are heavier1,56 and have larger dimensions57 than female calves, or it could also be due to other factors.
There is evidence that male calves are at risk for several reproductive disorders, including dystocia1 and stillbirths15, which have been associated with increased risk of mortality in dairy cows15,58. The percentage of male and female calves in this study was 50.5% and 49.5%, respectively, and male calves were more likely to be stillborn, which is consistent with the results of Maltecca et al.59 that male calves have a higher risk of stillbirth than female calves. According to a recent study, the stillbirth rate for male calves (7.7%) was more than twice as high as that of female calves (3.7%)60. Mellado et al.61 found that calves with a birth weight of < 35 kg had the highest probability of stillbirth, which is in line with our findings.
Gestation length, the period from conception to calving, has a significant impact on the breeding and performance of cattle62. Stillbirths are associated with both longer and shorter gestation periods63. According to Nogalsk and Piwczyński62, the optimal gestation length was found in the range of 275–277 days based on the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth. In a study of more than 4000 Friesian cows, Johanson and Berger45 found that 282 days was the optimal gestation length that minimizes the risk of stillbirth. Deviation from an optimal value for gestation length has resulted in increased stillbirth rates62. The average gestation length was 274 ± 5 days for cows with twin birth and 277 ± 5 days for cows with single births in the current study. Previous studies reported that cows calving twins were more likely to have stillbirths than cow calving singletons, probably due to shorter gestational periods and higher incidences of dystocia64,65. Early-born calves are more likely to die of oxygen deprivation (birth asphyxia) within 2 days, which may contribute to the higher stillbirth rate among twins. Therefore, cows that suffer dystocia when they calve twins are at increased risk for stillbirths.
Interactions
The interactions among multiple risk factors that determine the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth were evaluated and illustrated (Fig. 1). According to our results, the incidence of dystocia was associated with the interactions of twin status × calf birth weight and twin status × stillbirths. In the current study, calving calves that weigh more than 44 kg at birth may increase the risk of dystocia if the cows give birth to twins compared with singletons. This interaction can be explained by the fact that twins with higher birth weight (> 44 kg) have a more negative effect on feto-pelvic disproportion than single births. Dystocia is strongly associated with the ratio between the pelvic area of the dam and the birth weight of the calf55,66. Fetopelvic disproportion is caused by an incompatibility between the size of the fetus and the size of the maternal pelvis, which may result from one or a combination of factors67. Therefore, a heavy twin calf may have a harder time going through a smaller pelvic area than a light twin calf. There are other factors, such as over-expansion of the uterus due to the weight of the twins and their placenta, and impaired metabolism due to less space for the rumen in the abdomen, that could also affect the ease of calving in cows with twin fetuses compared to cows with single births.
The incidence of dystocia was associated with the interaction between twin status × stillbirths. The current study found that the incidence of dystocia in cows giving birth to stillborn calves increased in twins compared to singletons. There is a positive correlation between twin birth and stillbirths68. This interaction can be explained by the fact that cows with twins are more likely to have inadequate abdominal contractions and to deliver calves in an abnormal position, presentation, and posture69, which results in a higher risk of stillbirth. The interaction between twin status and dry period length was significantly associated with the incidence of stillbirths in the current study. According to the current study, the risk of dystocia was greater in cows with a dry period > 100 days when cows calving twins than those calving singletons. This interaction can be explained by the fact that a longer dry period means that cows may be exposed to anabolic influences for a longer period, increasing the likelihood of over-conditioning at calving70, higher calf birth weight, and stillbirth risk in twin calves. The interaction between twin status and parity was significantly associated with the incidence of stillbirths in the current study. In dairy cows, twinning increases with increasing parity, ranging from 1% at first parity to nearly 10% at later parities27. In this study, there was a greater incidence for twin calves to be stillborn when their dam at their fourth or greater parities (≥ 4). This interaction can be explained by the fact that the occurrence of twins in dairy cows increases with age (~ 4 to 30% with primiparous and multiparous cows), which is due to the increased occurrence of multiple ovulations71,72. One explanation is that due to a higher embryonic mortality rate in twin pregnancies73, a twin pregnancy in older cows has a lower probability of survival and is more likely to result in embryonic loss or stillbirth than in younger cows71. This could be because one embryo prevents the other from settling in the uterus, depriving it of nutrients and converting the pregnancy from twins to singletons, as has been documented in mares74.
The interaction between twin status and calving season was significantly associated with the incidence of stillbirths in the current study. Under conditions of heat stress, dams and their offspring show altered physiological responses, tissue development, metabolism, and immunity75. In utero hyperthermia negatively affects fetal growth and postnatal physiology of offspring, such as immune function and metabolic adaptation76,77,78. Cows that suffered from severe heat stress prenatally and at birth (THI > 83 units) were 1.3 more likely to stillbirth than cows with lower heat stress61. In the current study, a higher rate of stillbirths was observed in cows calving twins in summer than in other seasons. This can be explained by the fact that dams exposed to heat stress in late gestation delivered calves with lower birth weights, indicating impaired fetal development75,79,80. Therefore, heat stress in late gestation leads to intrauterine growth restriction and can decrease placental weight81,82, which may explain part of the lower birth weight due to in utero hyperthermia in summer than in winter in stillborn calves in cows that gave birth to twins.
Associations of blood macro-minerals at parturition with dystocia and stillbirth
We also compared dystocia and stillbirth in cows with macro-minerals deficiency and normal cows at the time of parturition. Normal blood Ca level in dairy cows is between 2.1 and 2.5 mmol/L (8.5 and 10 mg/dL)83. Based on available data, the highest incidence of dystocia (21.3%) and stillbirths (5.4%) was observed in the group of cows with plasma Ca concentrations less than 8 mg/dL at the time of parturition, which is considered hypocalcemia. These results are consistent with previous studies in which clinical hypocalcemia was associated with periparturient disorders such as dystocia84. Benzaquen et al.42 reported that dystocic cows had lower plasma Ca concentrations but increased plasma haptoglobin 24 h after calving compared with cows with normal parturition. Dairy cows have clinical hypocalcemia (milk fever) when blood serum Ca concentration is < 6.0 mg/dL and subclinical hypocalcemia when serum total Ca concentration is < 8.0 mg/dL83. Plasma Ca concentration decreases significantly around the time of calving83. Dairy cows typically excrete 30 to 40 g Ca per day in early lactation by producing colostrum (with 1.7–2.3 g Ca per kg) or milk (with 1.2 g Ca per kg)85. The reduction in plasma Ca levels reduces Ca stores in smooth muscle, especially in the sarcoplasmic network of skeletal muscle. Thus, the absence of uterine contractions or uterine fatigue, as well as abdominal muscle contractions, may prolong the parturition process in cattle and lead to dystocia86 and stillbirth.
Study limitations and possible applications
This study had the limitation of not being able to account for fetal presentations/abnormalities or distinguish between calves that died within 24 h and calves that were stillborn. The study was also limited by the fact that only one blood sample was collected at calving. Further studies with multiple blood samples around calving and to discover new biomarkers associated with dystocia and stillbirth would be helpful. Several attempts have been made to reduce the incidence of dystocia. For example, selection for low calf birth weight relative to expected sire progeny differences could contribute to the smaller skeletal size and lower calf birth weight, especially in heifers44. Also, selection for a larger pelvic area (pelvic height and width) as well as measuring internal pelvic dimensions and culling heifers with abnormally shaped or very small pelvic areas before breeding could help reduce the incidence of dystocia during the first parturition87,88. It is possible to reduce twinning as a risk factor of stillbirths in high-yielding dairy cows with a two-track approach. Double ovulation and dizygotic twins can be reduced by manipulating ovarian function to increase progesterone during growth of the preovulatory follicle before timed artificial insemination89,90,91. Second, cows diagnosed with bilateral twins early in gestation should be allowed to continue gestation with additional support at calving, whereas selective reduction may be attempted in cows diagnosed with unilateral twins91. Intensive monitoring of parturition is necessary to reduce the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth92,93,94. Several technologies are available to monitor the onset of calving94,95,96,97. These include inclinometers and accelerometers that detect tail raising and behavioural changes, intravaginal thermometers that detect allantochorion expulsion and body temperature drop, abdominal belts that monitor uterine contractions, and devices that monitor calf expulsion in the vaginal or vulvar lips94,98,99. To reduce the incidence of stillbirths, dairy cows can be monitored more frequently with a surveillance camera system before calving100. Evidence suggests that farmer obstetric skills and calving management training are associated with a reduction in stillbirth rates101,102. A previous study on an Irish dairy farm concluded that lack of monitoring of the second stage of parturition (expulsion of the calf) resulted in a higher incidence of dystocia in cattle103. This was recently confirmed by a Hungarian study in which monitoring the onset of calving with a calving alarm thermometer reduced the incidence of dystocia and improved postpartum health of the dam and newborn calf survival95.
Conclusions
Based on our results, the most important risk factors identified by RF for dystocia were length of dry period, calf birth weight, and parity. Cows with a long dry period of more than 100 days were associated with the highest incidence of dystocia, while cows with a short dry period between 46 and 60 days had the lowest incidence. Our results showed that the incidence of dystocia in cows that delivered stillborn calves was higher in twins than in singletons. This study found that cows giving birth to twins have an increased risk of dystocia if the calves weigh more than 44 kg, suggesting that twin calves with a higher birth weight have a greater impact on feto-pelvic disproportion than singletons. The major risk factors identified by RF for stillbirths were twin status, parity, length of dry period, and calf birth weight. However, at the cow level, several risk factors interact to cause stillbirths in dairy cows. In cows that gave birth to twins, the risk of stillbirth was greater in cows with parity > 4 than in other parities. One finding of this study was that cows with a dry period > 100 days had a higher risk of stillbirth in cows that gave birth to twins. Compared to other seasons, a higher rate of stillbirths was observed in cows calving twins in summer. Finally, calving in summer may increase the risk of stillbirth if calves are born at low birth weight (≤ 35 kg). As indicated by the data, cows that were hypo-calcemic at the time of parturition had a higher risk of dystocia and stillbirth.
Materials and methods
Farms and data collection
Isfahan province is located in a geographical area of 32 380 4100 N, 51 400 300 E with 4 different seasons. The criteria for selection of herds were (1) accurate recording system and completeness of data used in the model for dystocia and stillbirths, (2) possibility of blood sampling, and (3) herd size (farms with > 2500 dairy cows). Only 3 of 8 dairy farms with approximately 2500 to 4800 dairy cows were included in the study. Calving seasons were defined as spring (March to May), summer (June to August), autumn (September to November), and winter (December to February). The average annual temperature is 18.5 °C and ranges from − 10 °C (in January) to 41 °C (in July) with an average annual precipitation of 122 mm. The relative humidity typically ranges from 10 to 88%, with an average of 30% during 2011–2017 (Iran Meteorological Organization, 2018). Ethical approval for all procedures involving animals was obtained from the Animal Care and Use Committee of Isfahan University of Technology (IACUC#2010/05) before the study began. The study complies with ARRIVE guidelines for reporting in vivo experiments and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consents were obtained from the owners of the animals used in the study for the purpose of research and publication.
Performance and pedigree were officially recorded on all three dairy farms. During the dry- period, all cows were housed in sand-bedded freestall barns. All cows were moved to prepartum pens 21 ± 5 days before the expected calving date and were closely monitored by trained personnel and/or veterinarians on the farm. Cows were checked every 3–5 h for signs of imminent parturition (i.e., udder enlargement, milk let-down, relaxation of the tail ligament). After calving, all cows were moved to fresh housing pens with sand-bedded freestall barns where they remained for approximately 30 ± 4 days. Subsequently, cows were relocated to mid-lactation pens and fed regular lactation feed for ad libitum intake according to the farm's standard procedure. Cows were milked three times a day at 0800, 1600, and 0000 h (± 1 h) in a milking parlour equipped with mechanical ventilation (fan and spray system). Cows were fed a balanced total mixed ration (TMR) consisting of approximately 40% forage (corn silage, alfalfa hay, and straw) and 60% concentrate (i.e., barley grain, corn grain, beet pulp, soybean meal, canola meal, cottonseed meal, meat meal, protected fat powder, and vitamin supplements, sodium bicarbonate, macro-minerals, microminerals, salt, and feed additives). Although each herd had its feeding and management policy, all three dairy farms had regular veterinary care, artificial insemination, heat synchronization, and vaccination. All dairy cows were artificially inseminated, usually with semen from North American and European sires. Holstein cows from these dairy farms were subjected to the Ovsynch protocol by consulting veterinarians.
All cows were milked at the first scheduled milking time (within 2 to 6 h) after calving. Calves from dairy herds were housed individually in straw-bedded pens indoor in temperature-controlled buildings and received 5–6 l of colostrum during the first 12 h of life (2.5–3 L by 1 h after birth and 2.5–3 L at 12 h after the first feeding). In the case of twin birth, the birth weights of both calves were considered separately. Data on Freemartin heifers were excluded from the analysis. Calves were then housed outdoors in individual pens with free access to water, hay, and starter feed until weaning when they were moved to group housing. Routine veterinary care of milk-fed calves was provided by herd veterinarians.
The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 examined cow-level risk factors influencing dystocia and stillbirth, while phase 2 examined the likely associations between selected blood macro-minerals and dystocia and stillbirth. All data were collected throughout the study by veterinarians on each farm using the same farm management software system. Cows were identified by their unique ID number. The original data set was edited to ensure reliability and consistency for statistical analysis. Therefore, records with missing or ambiguous calving dates, incorrect evaluation dates (for drying off, breeding, parturition), missing parity number, BW outside 15 to 70 kg, gestation length of less than 260 or more than 300 days, and an outlier in selected blood macro-minerals were excluded from the analysis. For the identification of outliers in selected blood macro-minerals, box plots of each raw data set were checked, and Z-standardization was performed. Outliers were identified as values with a standard deviation > 2. Phase 1 data consisted of 51,405 calving records from 14,546 Holstein cows collected between April 2011 and September 2017. In Phase 2, blood samples were collected from a random subset of those cows comprising 1311 animals along with other management information between April and September 2017. Randomization was performed at cow level by a computer-generated random number list when visiting each farm at least once a week on the same day for blood collection from all calving cows.
Blood sampling and analysis
To investigate the association between selected macro-minerals in blood at the time of parturition (1 h before to 1 h after calving) and the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth, blood samples from 1311 cows were collected via the coccygeal vessels in evacuated tubes containing an anticoagulant (EDTA) at the time of parturition from April to September 2017. Samples were then centrifuged at 1300×g for 15 min and then stored at − 20 °C until analysis. Plasma concentrations of Ca, phosphorus (P), and Mg were measured with an autoanalyzer (Alcyon 300, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) using a diagnostic kit (Pars Azmoon Co., Tehran, Iran) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical analysis
Screening the dataset was conducted using the SQL Server software104 running on Microsoft Windows 10 (Pro × 64) operating system. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software v.9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, North Carolina; http://www.sas.com). Multivariable logistical regression procedures (PROC LOGISTIC) with backward elimination method through the maximum likelihood method of PROC GLIMMIX in SAS was performed to evaluate factors associated with the incidence of dystocia and stillbirth. At first, full data analysis including the main factors and all two-way interaction between variables was done. Interaction terms that did not significantly contribute to the regression model for dystocia and stillbirth were removed from the model one by one. Different models were compared using the Akaike information criteria (AIC) to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of the models. Also, multicollinearity among variables was evaluated in the model by computing the variance inflation factor (VIF). The homogeneity of variances (homoscedasticity) was verified by the specification of the COVTEST homogeneity command in SAS. An optimal model was selected based on the minimum AIC and the significance of the main effect or interaction associated with dystocia and stillbirth. The final models were as follows:
Dystocia
Stillbirth
where π = the odds probability of dystocia or stillbirth; α = intercept parameter; Cyear = fixed effect of calving year; Cseason = fixed effect of calving season; Parity = fixed effect of parity effect (l = 1, 2, 3, ≥ 4); Drylen = fixed effect of dry period length; BCS = fixed effect of body condition (BCS = 1, 2 and 3); TWN = fixed effect of twin status (1 = single birth, 2 = twin birth); Sex = fixed effect of calf sex (1 = male and 2 = female); Cweigth = fixed effect of calf weight at parturition (Cweigth = 1, 2, 3, …, 6); SB = fixed effect of calving status (0 = normal calving, 1 = stillbirth) dys = fixed effect of calving type (0 = easy calving, 1 = dystocia); β1 = regression coefficient of observations on gestation length (Preg) and age at first calving (AFC) as covariates and Herd = random effect. The association between dystocia and stillbirth incidence and each potential risk factor was investigated by odds ratio (OR) and its 95% CI. The incidence of dystocia or stillbirth was calculated by dividing the number of cases of dystocia or stillbirth per year by the total calving.
The statistical models employed for the selected blood macro-minerals were as follows:
where π = the odds probability of dystocia or stillbirth; α = the intercept parameter; Parityi = fixed effect of parity effect (l = 1, 2, 3, ≥ 4); Drylenj = fixed effect of dry period length; BCSk = the fixed effect of body condition (BCS = 1, 2 and 3); Sexl = fixed effect of calf sex (1 = male and 2 = female); Cweigthm = fixed effect of calf weight at parturition (Cweigth = 1, 2, 3, …, 6); \(CaL_{n}\): fixed effect of Ca concentrations levels (1, and 2); \(PL_{o}\): fixed effect of P concentrations levels (1, and 2); \(MgL_{p}\): fixed effect of Mg concentrations levels (1, and 2); β1 = regression coefficient of observations on gestation length (Preg) as a covariate and Herdr = random effect. Statistical significance was considered when P ≤ 0.05; a trend was considered when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.
Random forest was performed to rank cow-level risk factors based on their predictive value for dystocia and stillbirth from the machine learning module in JASP (Version 0.14)105. The dataset was split into three subsets: the training set (60%), the validation set (20%), and the test (20%). Classification performance is a report based on several metrics. For true positive (TP) as the number true positives, false positive (FP) as the number of false positives, true negative (TN) as the number of true negatives, and false negative (FN) as the number of false negatives, we measured the following:
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, M.H. Ghaffari, upon reasonable request.
References
Atashi, H., Abdolmohammadi, A., Dadpasand, M. & Asaadi, A. Prevalence, risk factors and consequent effect of dystocia in Holstein dairy cows in Iran. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 447–451. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11303 (2012).
Atashi, H., Zamiri, M. J. & Dadpasand, M. Association between dry period length and lactation performance, lactation curve, calf birth weight, and dystocia in Holstein dairy cows in Iran. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 3632–3638. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5943 (2013).
Mahnani, A., Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, A. & Keshavarzi, H. Performance and financial consequences of stillbirth in Holstein dairy cattle. Animal 12, 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117002026 (2018).
Fenlon, C. et al. A comparison of 4 predictive models of calving assistance and difficulty in dairy heifers and cows. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 9746–9758. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12931 (2017).
Mee, J. F. Managing the dairy cow at calving time. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 20, 521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2004.06.001 (2004).
Meyer, C. L., Berger, P. J., Koehler, K. J., Thompson, J. R. & Sattler, C. G. Phenotypic trends in incidence of stillbirth for Holsteins in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 515–523. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74502-X (2001).
Wall, E., Mrode, R., Banos, G. & Coffey, M. Development of calving-ease evaluations for UK Holstein–Friesian cows. Proc. BSAS Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Edinb. UK 1, 69 (2010).
Mee, J. F. Prevalence and risk factors for dystocia in dairy cattle: A review. Vet. J. 176, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.032 (2008).
Galvao, K. N. Uterine diseases in dairy cows: Understanding the causes and seeking solutions. Anim. Reprod. 10, 228–238 (2013).
Vincze, B. et al. Fetal metacarpal/metatarsal bone thickness as possible predictor of dystocia in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 10283–10289. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14658 (2018).
Berglund, B., Steinbock, L. & Elvander, M. Causes of stillbirth and time of death in Swedish Holstein calves examined post mortem. Acta Vet. Scand. 44, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-44-111 (2003).
Steinbock, L., Nasholm, A., Berglund, B., Johansson, K. & Philipsson, J. Genetic effects on stillbirth and calving difficulty in Swedish Holsteins at first and second calving. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 2228–2235. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73813-2 (2003).
Berry, D. P., Lee, J. M., Macdonald, K. A. & Roche, J. R. Body condition score and body weight effects on dystocia and stillbirths and consequent effects on postcalving performance. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4201–4211. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0023 (2007).
Bicalho, R. C., Galvao, K. N., Warnick, L. D. & Guard, C. L. Stillbirth parturition reduces milk production in Holstein cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 84, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.11.006 (2008).
Bicalho, R. C. et al. Effect of stillbirths on dam survival and reproduction performance in Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 2797–2803. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-504 (2007).
Hossein-Zadeh, N. G. The effect of twinning on milk yield, dystocia, calf birth weight and open days in Holstein dairy cows of Iran. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 94, 780–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2009.00963.x (2010).
Uematsu, M., Sasaki, Y., Kitahara, G., Sameshima, H. & Osawa, T. Risk factors for stillbirth and dystocia in Japanese Black cattle. Vet. J. 198, 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.016 (2013).
Mangurkar, B. R., Hayes, J. F. & Moxley, J. E. Effects of calving ease-calf survival on production and reproduction in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 67, 1496–1509. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81467-8 (1984).
Correa, M. T., Erb, H. & Scarlett, J. Path analysis for seven postpartum disorders of Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76, 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77461-5 (1993).
Emanuelson, U., Oltenacu, P. A. & Grohn, Y. T. Nonlinear mixed model analyses of five production disorders of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 76, 2765–2772. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77614-6 (1993).
Moss, N., Lean, I. J., Reid, S. W. & Hodgson, D. R. Risk factors for repeat-breeder syndrome in New South Wales dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 54, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-5877(02)00016-8 (2002).
Maizon, D. O., Oltenacu, P. A., Grohn, Y. T., Strawderman, R. L. & Emanuelson, U. Effects of diseases on reproductive performance in Swedish Red and White dairy cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 66, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.002 (2004).
Nix, J. M., Spitzer, J. C., Grimes, L. W., Burns, G. L. & Plyler, B. B. A retrospective analysis of factors contributing to calf mortality and dystocia in beef cattle. Theriogenology 49, 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00097-1 (1998).
Olson, K. M., Cassell, B. G., McAllister, A. J. & Washburn, S. P. Dystocia, stillbirth, gestation length, and birth weight in Holstein, Jersey, and reciprocal crosses from a planned experiment. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 6167–6175. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2260 (2009).
Day, J. D., Weaver, L. D. & Franti, C. E. Twin pregnancy diagnosis in Holstein cows: Discriminatory powers and accuracy of diagnosis by transrectal palpation and outcome of twin pregnancies. Can. Vet. J. 36, 93–97 (1995).
Mee, J. F. Perinatal calf mortality. Vet. Rec. 129, 202–203. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.129.9.202-a (1991).
Fricke, P. M. Review: Twinning in dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Sci. 17, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31599-0 (2001).
Anderson, G. B., BonDurant, R. H. & Cupps, P. T. Induction of twins in different breeds of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 54, 485–490. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.543485x (1982).
Echternkamp, S. E. & Gregory, K. E. Effects of twinning on postpartum reproductive performance in cattle selected for twin births. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77148x (1999).
Schambow, R. A., Bennett, T. B., Dopfer, D. & Martins, J. P. N. A retrospective study investigating the association of parity, breed, calving month and year, and previous parity milk yield and calving interval with twin births in US dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 104, 5047–5055. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19421 (2021).
Barrier, A. C., Mason, C., Dwyer, C. M., Haskell, M. J. & Macrae, A. I. Stillbirth in dairy calves is influenced independently by dystocia and body shape. Vet. J. 197, 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.019 (2013).
Atashi, H., Asaadi, A. & Hostens, M. Association between age at first calving and lactation performance, lactation curve, calving interval, calf birth weight, and dystocia in Holstein dairy cows. PLoS ONE 16, e0244825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244825 (2021).
Neves, R. C. et al. Association of immediate postpartum plasma calcium concentration with early-lactation clinical diseases, culling, reproduction, and milk production in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13313 (2018).
Horst, E. A., Kvidera, S. K. & Baumgard, L. H. Invited review: The influence of immune activation on transition cow health and performance—A critical evaluation of traditional dogmas. J. Dairy Sci. 104, 8380–8410. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20330 (2021).
Heuwieser, W., Hartig, U., Offeney, F. & Grunert, E. Significance of glucocorticoids as a parameter of stress in cattle in the periparturient period. J. Vet. Med. Ser. A-Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 34, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1987.tb00271.x (1987).
Hudson, S., Mullford, M., Whittlestone, W. G. & Payne, E. Bovine plasma corticoids during parturition. J. Dairy Sci. 59, 744–746. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84267-1 (1976).
Vannucchi, C. I. et al. Association between birth conditions and glucose and cortisol profiles of periparturient dairy cows and neonatal calves. Vet. Rec. 176, 358. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102862 (2015).
Melendez, P., Donovan, G. A., Risco, C. A. & Goff, J. P. Plasma mineral and energy metabolite concentrations in dairy cows fed an anionic prepartum diet that did or did not have retained fetal membranes after parturition. Am. J. Vet. Res. 65, 1071–1076. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1071 (2004).
Hernandez, J., Risco, C. A. & Elliott, J. B. Effect of oral administration of a calcium chloride gel on blood mineral concentrations, parturient disorders, reproductive performance, and milk production of dairy cows with retained fetal membranes. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 215, 72–76 (1999).
McArt, J. A. A. & Neves, R. C. Association of transient, persistent, or delayed subclinical hypocalcemia with early lactation disease, removal, and milk yield in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 103, 690–701. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17191 (2020).
Serrenho, R. C., DeVries, T. J., Duffield, T. F. & LeBlanc, S. J. Graduate student literature review: What do we know about the effects of clinical and subclinical hypocalcemia on health and performance of dairy cows?*. J. Dairy Sci. 104, 6304–6326. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19371 (2021).
Benzaquen, M. et al. Effect of oral mineral and energy supplementation on blood mineral concentrations, energetic and inflammatory profile, and milk yield in dairy cows affected with dystocia. Vet. J. 204, 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.001 (2015).
Post, C., Rietz, C., Buscher, W. & Muller, U. Using sensor data to detect lameness and mastitis treatment events in dairy cows: A comparison of classification models. Sensors 20, 3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20143863 (2020).
Colburn, D. J., Deutscher, G. H., Nielsen, M. K. & Adams, D. C. Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 75, 1452–1460 (1997).
Johanson, J. M. & Berger, P. J. Birth weight as a predictor of calving ease and perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 3745–3755. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73981-2 (2003).
Johanson, J. M., Berger, P. J., Tsuruta, S. & Misztal, I. A Bayesian threshold-linear model evaluation of perinatal mortality, dystocia, birth weight, and gestation length in a Holstein herd. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 450–460. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2992 (2011).
Gaafar, H. M., Shamiah Sh, M., El-Hamd, M. A., Shitta, A. A. & El-Din, M. A. Dystocia in Friesian cows and its effects on postpartum reproductive performance and milk production. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9682-3 (2011).
Enevoldsen, C. & Sorensen, J. T. Effects of dry period length on clinical mastitis and other major clinical health disorders. J. Dairy Sci. 75, 1007–1014. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77843-6 (1992).
Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Guard, C. L., Brand, A. & Vanderweyden, G. C. Cesarean-Section in dairy-cattle—A study of risk-factors. Theriogenology 37, 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(92)90206-7 (1992).
Morrow, D. A., Hillman, D., Dade, A. W. & Kitchen, H. Clinical investigation of a dairy-herd with the fat cow syndrome. J. Am. Vet. Med. 174, 161–167 (1979).
Roche, J. R. et al. Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 5769–5801. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2431 (2009).
Thilsing-Hansen, T., Jorgensen, R. J. & Ostergaard, S. Milk fever control principles: A review. Acta Vet. Scand. 43, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-43-1 (2002).
Berger, P. J., Cubas, A. C., Koehler, K. J. & Healey, M. H. Factors affecting dystocia and early calf mortality in angus cows and heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 70, 1775–1786 (1992).
De Amicis, I., Veronesi, M. C., Robbe, D., Gloria, A. & Carluccio, A. Prevalence, causes, resolution and consequences of bovine dystocia in Italy. Theriogenology 107, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.11.001 (2018).
Basarab, J. A., Rutter, L. M. & Day, P. A. The efficacy of predicting dystocia in yearling beef heifers: I. Using ratios of pelvic area to birth weight or pelvic area to heifer weight. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7161359x (1993).
Norman, H. D., Hutchison, J. L. & Miller, R. H. Use of sexed semen and its effect on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth of Holsteins in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 3880–3890. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2781 (2010).
Philipsson, J. Studies on calving difficulty, stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish cattle breeds IV. Relationships between calving performance, precalving body measurements and size of pelvic opening in Friesian Heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 26, 221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015127609435091 (1976).
Dematawewa, C. M. B. & Berger, P. J. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility, and survival in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 2700–2709. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75827-8 (1998).
Maltecca, C., Khatib, H., Schutzkus, V. R., Hoffman, P. C. & Weigel, K. A. Changes in conception rate, calving performance, and calf health and survival from the use of crossbred Jersey x Holstein sires as mates for Holstein dams. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 2747–2754. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72351-7 (2006).
Morek-Kopeć, M., Zarnecki, A., Ptak, E. & Otwinowska-Mindur, A. Effect of calving difficulties and calf mortality on functional longevity in polish Holstein–Friesian cows. Animals 11, 2792 (2021).
Mellado, M. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for stillbirths in Holstein cows in a hot environment. Span. J. Agric. Res. 15, e040. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017152-10293 (2017).
Nogalski, Z. & Piwczynski, D. Association of length of pregnancy with other reproductive traits in dairy cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11084 (2012).
Norman, H. D. et al. Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 2259–2269. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0982 (2009).
Echternkamp, S. E. & Gregory, K. E. Effects of twinning on gestation length, retained placenta, and dystocia. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77139x (1999).
Nielen, M., Schukken, Y. H., Scholl, D. T., Wilbrink, H. J. & Brand, A. Twinning in dairy-cattle—A study of risk-factors and effects. Theriogenology 32, 845–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(89)90473-1 (1989).
Bures, D., Barton, L., Zahradkova, R., Teslik, V. & Fiedlerova, M. Calving difficulty as related to body weights and measurements of cows and calves in a herd of Gascon breed. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 53, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.17221/312-Cjas (2008).
Norman, S. Risk factors for dystocia in cattle. Multidiscip. Digit. Publ. Inst. Proc. 36, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036128 (2020).
Hossein-Zadeh, N. G., Nejati-Javaremi, A., Miraei-Ashtiani, S. R. & Kohram, H. An observational analysis of twin births, calf stillbirth, calf sex ratio, and abortion in Iranian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 4198–4205. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1079 (2008).
Gundelach, Y., Essmeyer, K., Teltscher, M. K. & Hoedemaker, M. Risk factors for perinatal mortality in dairy cattle: Cow and foetal factors, calving process. Theriogenology 71, 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.10.011 (2009).
Opsomer, G. et al. Risk factors for post partum ovarian dysfunction in high producing dairy cows in Belgium: A field study. Theriogenology 53, 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691x(00)00234-X (2000).
Macmillan, K., Kastelic, J. P. & Colazo, M. G. Update on multiple ovulations in dairy cattle. Animals https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8050062 (2018).
del Rio, N. S., Stewart, S., Rapnicki, P., Chang, Y. M. & Fricke, P. M. An observational analysis of twin births, calf sex ratio, and calf mortality in Holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71614-4 (2007).
Lopez-Gatius, F. & Hunter, R. H. F. Spontaneous reduction of advanced twin embryos: Its occurrence and clinical relevance in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 63, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.03.006 (2005).
Ginther, O. J. Twin embryos in mares 2 Post fixation embryo reduction. Equine Vet J. 21, 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02134.x (1989).
Tao, S. & Dahl, G. E. Invited review: Heat stress effects during late gestation on dry cows and their calves. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 4079–4093. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6278 (2013).
Monteiro, A. P., Tao, S., Thompson, I. M. & Dahl, G. E. Effect of heat stress during late gestation on immune function and growth performance of calves: Isolation of altered colostral and calf factors. J. Dairy Sci. 97, 6426–6439. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7891 (2014).
Monteiro, A. P. A. et al. Effect of maternal heat stress during the dry period on growth and metabolism of calves. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 3896–3907. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10699 (2016).
Dahl, G. E., Tao, S. & Monteiro, A. P. A. Effects of late-gestation heat stress on immunity and performance of calves. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 3193–3198. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9990 (2016).
Tao, S. et al. Effect of heat stress during the dry period on mammary gland development. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 5976–5986. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4329 (2011).
Tao, S., Monteiro, A. P., Thompson, I. M., Hayen, M. J. & Dahl, G. E. Effect of late-gestation maternal heat stress on growth and immune function of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 7128–7136. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5697 (2012).
Collier, R. J., Doelger, S. G., Head, H. H., Thatcher, W. W. & Wilcox, C. J. Effects of heat stress during pregnancy on maternal hormone concentrations, calf birth weight and postpartum milk yield of Holstein cows. J. Anim. Sci. 54, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.542309x (1982).
Wallace, J. M., Regnault, T. R., Limesand, S. W., Hay, W. W. Jr. & Anthony, R. V. Investigating the causes of low birth weight in contrasting ovine paradigms. J. Physiol. 565, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.082032 (2005).
Goff, J. P. The monitoring, prevention, and treatment of milk fever and subclinical hypocalcemia in dairy cows. Vet. J. 176, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.020 (2008).
Curtis, C. R. et al. Association of parturient hypocalcemia with eight periparturient disorders in Holstein cows. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 183, 559–561 (1983).
Goff, J. P. Macromineral disorders of the transition cow. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 20, 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2004.06.003 (2004).
Schuenemann, G. M., Nieto, I., Bas, S., Galvao, K. N. & Workman, J. Assessment of calving progress and reference times for obstetric intervention during dystocia in Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 5494–5501. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4436 (2011).
Holm, D. E., Webb, E. C. & Thompson, P. N. A new application of pelvis area data as culling tool to aid in the management of dystocia in heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 2296–2303. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6967 (2014).
Vandonkersgoed, J., Ribble, C. S., Booker, C. W., Mccartney, D. & Janzen, E. D. The predictive value of pelvimetry in beef-cattle. Can. J. Vet. Res.-Revue Can. Rech. Vet. 57, 170–175 (1993).
Cerri, R. L. A. et al. Concentration of progesterone during the development of the ovulatory follicle: I. Ovarian and embryonic responses. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 3342–3351. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3734 (2011).
Stevenson, J. S., Portaluppi, M. A. & Tenhouse, D. E. Factors influencing upfront single- and multiple-ovulation incidence, progesterone, and luteolysis before a timed insemination resynchronization protocol. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 5542–5551. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0475 (2007).
Cabrera, V. E. & Fricke, P. M. Economics of twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. Animals 11, 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020552 (2021).
Adams, W. M. The elective induction of labor and parturition in cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 154, 261–268 (1969).
Wagner, W. C., Willham, R. L. & Evans, L. E. Controlled parturition in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 38, 485–489. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1974.383485x (1974).
Horvath, A. et al. A field study using different technologies to detect calving at a large-scale Hungarian dairy farm. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 56, 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13904 (2021).
Choukeir, A. I. et al. Effect of monitoring the onset of calving by a calving alarm thermometer on the prevalence of dystocia, stillbirth, retained fetal membranes and clinical metritis in a Hungarian dairy farm. Theriogenology 145, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.10.004 (2020).
Ouellet, V. et al. Evaluation of calving indicators measured by automated monitoring devices to predict the onset of calving in Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 1539–1548. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10057 (2016).
Krieger, S. et al. An ear-attached accelerometer as an on-farm device to predict the onset of calving in dairy cows. Biosyst. Eng. 184, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.06.011 (2019).
Saint-Dizier, M. & Chastant-Maillard, S. Methods and on-farm devices to predict calving time in cattle. Vet. J. 205, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.05.006 (2015).
Burfeind, O., Suthar, V. S., Voigtsberger, R., Bonk, S. & Heuwieser, W. Validity of prepartum changes in vaginal and rectal temperature to predict calving in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 5053–5061. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4484 (2011).
Szenci, O. et al. Importance of monitoring calving to decrease stillbirths rate in dairy farms. Literature review. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja 141, 11–23 (2019).
Schuenemann, G. M., Bas, S., Gordon, E. & Workman, J. D. Dairy calving management: Description and assessment of a training program for dairy personnel. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 2671–2680. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5976 (2013).
Schuenemann, G. M. et al. Dairy nutrition management: Assessing a comprehensive continuing education program for veterinary practitioners. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 2648–2656. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3902 (2011).
O’Shaughnessy, J. et al. Herd health status and management practices on 16 Irish suckler beef farms. Ir Vet J 66, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-66-21 (2013).
Haxhijaha, B., Ajdari, J., Raufi, B., Zenuni, X. & Ismaili, F. Query optimization in Microsoft Sql server. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Secur. 10, 13–22 (2018).
Love, J. et al. JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. J. Stat. Softw. 88, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i02 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to extend their special thanks to the managers of F.K.A, Goldasht, Foude, and Fazil dairy farm as well as to the experts, veterinarians, laboratories who lent their assistance. Mr. Jabbarzare and others who helped us in this study also deserve our gratitude. The authors confirm that there are no recognized conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.B. and G.R.G., M.H.G. supervised the study. M.B. conducted the farm trial. M.H.G. served as a scientific advisor. A. S., A. M., and M.H.G. did data analysis and visualization. M.H.G performed interpretation and wrote the original draft. M.H.G. revised the manuscript for intellectual content. J. K. D., and M. H. G. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bahrami-Yekdangi, M., Ghorbani, G.R., Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, A. et al. Identification of cow-level risk factors and associations of selected blood macro-minerals at parturition with dystocia and stillbirth in Holstein dairy cows. Sci Rep 12, 5929 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09928-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09928-w
This article is cited by
-
Climatic and calf-related risk factors associated with failure of transfer of passive immunity in Holstein calves in a hot environment
Tropical Animal Health and Production (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
