Abstract
Peptides are commonly used as biosensors for analytes such as metal ions as they have natural binding preferences. In our previous peptide-based impedimetric metal ion biosensors, a monolayer of the peptide was anchored covalently to the electrode. Binding of metal ions resulted in a conformational change of the oxytocin peptide in the monolayer, which was measured using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Here, we demonstrate that sensing can be achieved also when the oxytocin is non-covalently integrated into an alkanethiol host monolayer. We show that ion-binding cause morphological changes to the dense host layer, which translates into enhanced impedimetric signals compared to direct covalent assembly strategies. This biosensor proved selective and sensitive for Zn2+ ions in the range of nano- to micro-molar concentrations. This strategy offers an approach to utilize peptide flexibility in monitoring their response to the environment while embedded in a hydrophobic monolayer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Biosensors play a major role in biomedical diagnosis1. The well described applications of biosensors contribute to progress in the clinical, environmental and agricultural industries2. Biosensors are analytical devices that perform two functions: recognition of an analyte and transduction to a measurable signal3. Electrochemical biosensors are commonly used for label-free sensing of bio-recognition events4. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is an electrochemical technique sensitive to changes in the sensory layer’s electronic properties5,6. EIS often used to measure a recognition event between a biomolecule and an analyte because, upon binding, the sensory layer undergoes morphological changes that result in alternations of interface properties such as charge, hydrophobicity, capacitance, and surface density. These changes affect the permeation ability of the RedOx agent through the layer, thus, results in detectable impedimetric signal5,7,8,9.
Peptides are often used as recognition entities in biosensors due to their specific affinity towards many moieties, which are crucial for their biological activity10,11,12. Peptides are specifically attractive for EIS since they undergo massive conformational and dipole changes upon analyte binding resulting in measurable signal12,13,14. Their selectivity towards analytes such as proteins15, glycans16,17, small molecules18, and ions19 can be controlled by changing the sequence of amino acids. The multi-functionality of the peptide can also enable anchoring to a surface without harming their affinity towards a specific analyte20,21. Such decoupling enables impedimetric sensing on differently modified sensing platforms22.
Oxytocin (OT) is a neuropeptide with an affinity to both Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions23. Moreover, binding these ions is essential for OT biological activities24,25. Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions bind OT via different mechanisms and do not utilize the same binding sites for the interactions23,26,27. Namely, the terminal amine is essential for activation of OT-Cu2+ and initiates binding cascade, which proceeds with deprotonation of backbone amides23,28,29. Chelation of Zn2+ in OT proceeds via interactions with amides carbonyls23,28. Each of these metal ions induces distinctive conformational, electronic, and hydrophobicity changes to the OT complex24,30. Therefore, OT selectivity and sensitivity can be tuned for biosensing applications of Zn2+ and Cu2+20,31,32.
In our previous studies, we described several types of electrochemical OT-based biosensors for Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions. In these models, oxytocin was either anchored to a gold surface through a native disulfide bond20 or attached to a glassy carbon electrode using a silane-coupling strategy33. We showed that by coupling OT through terminal amine to lipoic acid, the affinity towards Cu2+ was blocked and the selectivity towards Zn2+ was improved32. This sensor proved highly selective but suffered from low surface charge transfer resistance (RCT) alternation, which can be explained by the low impedimetric signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the system. Low surface coverage is usually associated with peptides assembly since they are flexible, in constant conformational equilibrium/shift and experience repulsion from neighbouring peptides34,35. Contrary, long alkyl thiols pack to a very dense monolayer on gold surfaces and can act as a host layer for hydrophobic moieties36,37. We hypothesize that a recognition of analyte by a peptides embedded within a dense host layer may lead to significant changes in the properties of entire sensory layer and result in enhancement of the impedimetric signal.
In this study we present a biosensing platform in which OT functionalized with a dodecanoic acid (Dd) was embedded in a host alkane thiol monolayer by non-covalent interactions. OT functionalization leads to both selectivity toward Zn2+ ions due to terminal amine blocking and also to interlayer affinity by introducing alkane chain. The presented strategy extrapolates the formed hydrophobic surface of OT after Zn2+ chelation to change peptide interactions with the hexadecane thiol (HDT) layer and thus produce a measurable and concentration-dependent impedimetric signal. We envisioned that the effect of the peptide-metal ion chelation on the morphological changes in the sensory layer might lead to amplification of the impedimetric RCT parameters and hence could be applied for improving electrochemical biosensing. These bioactive intercalated monolayers were characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM), variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE), contact angle (CA), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to study the interplay between surface morphology and the impedance.
Results and discussion
Platform design
OT was synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis in which dodecanoic-acid was coupled to the OT-terminal amine (see SI, Figure S1). The obtained Dodecanoic-Oxytocin (Dd-OT) designed to facilitate embodiment to the intercalation to the HDT self-assembled monolayer (SAM) on gold substrate by van der Waals (vdW) interactions between alkyl groups (Fig. 1).
Characterization of the system
Au-evaporated layer on Si wafers was modified with HDT SAM following incubation with Dd-OT and further exposure to Zn2+ (Fig. 1). These modified wafers were characterized by VASE, AFM, CA, and XPS. The HDT formed homogenous typical and well described38,39. SAM with measured thickness of 1.9 ± 0.1 nm, CA of 104° ± 2°, and roughness of 1.8 ± 0.1 nm (Figure S3). These substrates were incubated with Dd-OT and analyzed by XPS. The analysis (Figure S7) confirmed the presence of amide bonds related to Dd-OT at BE of 400.2 eV (related to N1s 1/2)40 and carbonyl groups (Figure S8) by the peak of 288.5 eV (related to C1s/8). The embedding of the layer with Dd-OT resulted in a total layer thickness of 3.4 ± 0.2 nm and roughness of 1 ± 0.1 nm (Fig. 2A). The measured increase in thickness and the decrease of roughness indicate that embedding Dd-OT changes the morphological properties of the host HDT SAM on Au substrate. However, the CA with a value of 103° ± 1° indicated that the change in hydrophobicity due to the assembly of the peptide on the host layer is insignificant.
Exposure of the sensory layer to Zn2+, which is the analyte of the Dd-OT recognition element, resulted in the appearance of an XPS peak (Figure S9) with BE of 1022.3 eV (related to Zn2p 3/2), which is shifted relative to free Zn2+, that indicates the presence of the chelated Zn2+20,41. AFM analysis indicated a roughness decrease to 0.5 ± 0.1 nm (Fig. 2B), while CA of 94° ± 1° related to a decrease in hydrophobicity. No significant thickness changes were observed by VASE analyses upon exposure for Zn2+. The decrease in hydrophobicity may indicate that a more hydrophilic layer containing the charged Dd-OT-Zn2+ was formed. The roughness alternation, which was measured by AFM (Fig. 2A,B), indicates the morphological changes in the layer due to Zn2+ binding20,32,42. The fact that VASE measurements did not show any changes in the thickness of the layer indicates that there are no significant changes in the positioning of the peptide in relation to the host layer. AFM with a quantitative mode of operation (QI) was performed to calculate stiffness values and Young’s modulus of Dd-OT modified substrates before and after exposure to Zn2+ (Fig. 2C,D and Figures S4–S6). The exposure to Zn2+ caused an increase in Young’s modulus from 2 ± 1 GPa to 4.8 ± 0.5 GPa, indicating that Zn2+ results in morphological changes of the monolayer43. The changes in surface morphology and other presented parameters caused by the binding of Zn2+ on the biosensing platform, can be further applied in impedimetric biosensing, which is a sensitive technique to exploit changes in layer morphology.
Impedimetric analysis of HDT SAM and Dd-OT intercalation
Au working electrodes were modified with HDT SAM by the presented protocol and analyzed by EIS measured in a solution containing [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3−. This modification resulted in an increase of RCT from 0.2 kΩ for bare Au electrode (Figure S2) to 89 kΩ for HDT SAM (Fig. 3) indicating the formation of a dense layer44. After the immersion of the HDT-modified electrode in Dd-OT solution, the RCT increased to 697 kΩ, which is much higher than the value observed for OT covalently attached to the surface20,32. This large increase in the RCT values can be attributed to changes in layer morphology such as density, stiffness, rigidity, etc. caused by intercalation of HDT with Dd-OT2,4,5,6,9.
Dose–response of Dd-OT sensor to Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions
HDT-Dd-OT sensor was exposed to Zn2+ solutions with increasing concentrations from 10–12 M to 10–6 M (Fig. 4). The exposure to Zn2+ concentrations lower than 10–10 M had no considerable effect on the RCT values, which is below the limit of detection of the presented sensor. At concentrations ranging from 10–10 M to 10–8 M, the impedimetric response gradually increased and eventually reached a value five times higher than the measured RCT values prior to Zn2+ exposure (Fig. 4B). At higher concentrations (above 10–8), the sensor reached its saturation and the signal stabilized. The exposure of the intercalated OT layer to 10–8 M of Zn2+ (HDT-Dd-OT-Zn2+) resulted in a signal enhancement that reached an RCT value which is five times higher than that of the surface prior to incubation with the ion (HDT-Dd-OT). This signal enhancement surpasses the response following exposure to Zn2+ of chemisorbed or covalently bound OT surface layers, which only reached an increase of up to 1.35 in RCT values over the same range of concentration32. We assume that the signal enhancement observed is because the OT complexation with Zn2+ influences not only the peptide conformation itself but also modifies the morphology and the net charge of the entire sensory layer. This directly influences the permeation of the redox species through the intercalated layer. To verify the selectivity of the sensor, dose–response analysis for Cu2+ ions was performed. No significant impedimetric response was observed in the relative concentration range (10–12 M to 10–6 M; see Fig. 4, Figure S10). This demonstrates that the dodecyl functionalization of OT by amidation of the terminal amine blocks its ability to complex Cu2+, as previously reported32.
Conclusions
In this work, we designed a new Zn2+ ion-selective receptor based on an alkyl-amidated OT embedded in a host alkanethiol monolayer by vdW interactions. This intercalated peptide monolayer induces enhanced impedimetric response upon ion-binding. Its response to Zn2+ induced conformational changes that evoked morphological changes to the entire monolayer. These alterations were probed by impedimetric measurements and yielded a selective sensor for Zn2+ ions in the range of 0.1 nm up to 10 nm. By this, the monolayer serves as a host for the Dd-OT sensing peptide, which enhances the RCT multiplication for the biorecognition event. This approach is fundamentally different from sensors assembled by direct covalently bound OT monolayers. This non-covalent assembly concept can be further extended to other bio-receptors incorporated in natural and artificial membranes.
Materials and methods
Surface modifications
OT was synthesized using solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) and modified by coupling dodecanoic-acid (Dd) to the N-terminal using the same method (see SI). Au layer (100 nm) was evaporated on top of a Cr layer (10 nm), which was evaporated on the substrate of n-type Si wafer (\(\left\langle {100} \right\rangle\)). The bare gold surfaces were washed with absolute ethanol, before and after 20 min cleaning using Ultra Violet Ozone Cleaning Systems (UVOCS Inc). HDT (CH3–(CH2)15–SH, Sigma-Aldrich) was freshly distilled under vacuum before use. HDT adsorption was performed by immersing bare gold surfaces in HDT solution (10 mM in absolute ethanol) for 18 h at 22 °C. After incubation, the surfaces were washed with absolute ethanol and dried under dry N2. Dd-OT was dissolved in ammonium acetate (AA) buffer (50 Mm, pH = 7) (Sigma-Aldrich). Then, HDT-modified surfaces were immersed in the Dd-OT solution (10 µM) overnight at 22 °C to allow the intercalation of Dd-OT with the HDT SAM. Afterward, the surfaces were washed by immersion in AA buffer for 10 min and dried under dry N2. Complex formation of Dd-OT with either Zn2+ or Cu2+ ions was obtained by incubating the modified surfaces in 10 µM Zn2+/Cu2+ in AA buffer for 10 min.
Ellipsometry
Thickness measurements were performed by variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE) measurements with VB-400 ellipsometer (Woollam, Lincoln, NE, USA) at the Brewster angle of 75°.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM)
Measurements were carried out by NanoWizard3 (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) in fresh AA buffer (pH = 7) at 298 K, using Aspire CT-130 (Team Nanotech, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany) cantilevers with a spring constant of 6 N/m under QI mode—force curve-based imaging. To assure homogeneity of the surface, images were taken at different regions of the same surface and at a resolution of 500 × 500 pixels, an area of 2 × 2 μm and at a pixel rate of 0.8 Hz. Young’s modulus and stiffness values were calculated by JPK Instrument data analysis software using Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov (DMT) model and the force curve slope.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)
Electrochemical analyses were conducted by Metrohm-Autolab PGSTAT-302N digital potentiostat (EcoChemie BV, Utrecht, Netherlands) operated by Nova software. The electrochemical cell contained three electrodes: Ag/AgCl/3M KCl as a reference electrode, Pt as a counter electrode, and a polycrystalline disc gold electrodes with a 2 mm diameter (CH instruments) The electrolyte solution was prepared from AA buffer (50 mM, pH = 7) which contained 0.1 M KCl as a supporting electrolyte, and 5.0 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], 5.0 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] as RedOx species. The gold electrodes were cleaned by polishing with 0.05 µm alumina suspension on micro-cloth pads (Buehler). Electrode modifications were performed following the precedent described procedures. The frequency range was 0.1 Hz–10 kHz for HDT-modified electrode measurement, and 0.01 Hz–10 kHz for Dd-OT-modified electrode measurement. After dip—coating, the HDT-modified electrode was washed with ethanol absolute and the Dd-OT-modified electrode with AA buffer, until stabilization of the impedance response. Then, dose–response of the sensor was conducted by 10 min incubation of the Dd-OT-modified gold electrode in Zn2+/Cu2+ solution (1 pM–10 µM at room temperature). After each EIS measurement, the modified electrode was washed and moved to a higher concentration. The equivalent circuit chosen to fit EIS data was RS(Q[RCT|W]), with RS value for solution's resistance, Q for layer’s capacitance, RCT for charge transfer resistance of the layer, and W for Warburg impedance. The results are presented as normalized RCT. The charge transfer resistance was normalized by dividing the RCT value after exposure to heavy metal ions by the RCT value before exposure.
Data availability
All data are available upon request.
References
Bhalla, N., Jolly, P., Formisano, N. & Estrela, P. Introduction to biosensors. Essays Biochem. 60(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20150001 (2016).
Mehrotra, P. Biosensors and their applications—A review. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.12.002 (2016).
Liu, H.; Ge, J.; Ma, E.; Yang, L. Advanced Biomaterials for Biosensor and Theranostics. In Biomaterials in Translational Medicine: A Biomaterials Approach 213–255 (Elsevier, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813477-1.00010-4.
Grieshaber, D., MacKenzie, R., Vörös, J. & Reimhult, E. Electrochemical biosensors—Sensor principles and architectures. Sensors 8(3), 1400–1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/s80314000 (2008).
Bertok, T. et al. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy based biosensors: Mechanistic principles, analytical examples and challenges towards commercialization for assays of protein cancer biomarkers. ChemElectroChem 6(4), 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201800848 (2019).
Bogomolova, A. et al. Challenges of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in protein biosensing. Anal. Chem. 81(10), 3944–3949. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9002358 (2009).
Hui, Y., Bian, C., Wang, J., Tong, J. & Xia, S. Comparison of two types of overoxidized PEDOT films and their application in sensor fabrication. Sensors 17(3), 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030628 (2017).
Butterworth, A. et al. SAM composition and electrode roughness affect performance of a DNA biosensor for antibiotic resistance. Biosensors 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios9010022 (2019).
Lisdat, F. & Schäfer, D. The use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for biosensing. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-1970-7 (2008).
Tothill, I. E. Biosensors for cancer markers diagnosis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.01.015 (2009).
Barbosa, A. J. M., Oliveira, A. R. & Roque, A. C. A. Protein- and peptide-based biosensors in artificial olfaction. Trends Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.004 (2018).
Liu, X., Marrakchi, M., Xu, D., Dong, H. & Andreescu, S. Biosensors based on modularly designed synthetic peptides for recognition, detection and live/dead differentiation of pathogenic bacteria. Biosens. Bioelectron. 80, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.041 (2016).
Liu, Q., Wang, J. & Boyd, B. J. Peptide-based biosensors. Talanta https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.12.020 (2015).
Puiu, M. & Bala, C. Peptide-based biosensors: from self-assembled interfaces to molecular probes in electrochemical assays. Bioelectrochemistry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.11.009 (2018).
Campbell, G. A. & Mutharasan, R. Detection and quantification of proteins using self-excited PZT-glass millimeter-sized cantilever. Biosens. Bioelectron. 21(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2004.12.016 (2005).
Witte, C. et al. Live-cell MRI with xenon hyper-CEST biosensors targeted to metabolically labeled cell-surface glycans. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(9), 2806–2810. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201410573 (2015).
Kluková, L., Bertok, T., Kasák, P. & Tkac, J. Nanoscale-controlled architecture for the development of ultrasensitive lectin biosensors applicable in glycomics. Anal. Methods https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ay00495g (2014).
Pavan, S. & Berti, F. Short peptides as biosensor transducers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5589-8 (2012).
Gooding, J., Hibbert, D. & Yang, W. Electrochemical metal ion sensors. Exploiting amino acids and peptides as recognition elements. Sensors 1(3), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.3390/s10300075 (2001).
Mervinetsky, E. et al. Direct assembly and metal-ion binding properties of oxytocin monolayer on gold surfaces. Langmuir 35(34), 11114–11122. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01830 (2019).
Kogikoski, S. et al. Multifunctional biosensors based on peptide-polyelectrolyte conjugates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18(4), 3223–3233. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp07165h (2016).
arimzadeh, A., Hasanzadeh, M., Shadjou, N. & de la Guardia, M. Peptide based biosensors. Trends Chem. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.07.018 (2018).
Bowers, M. T., Liu, D. & Wyttenbach, T. Interaction of divalent metal ions with the hormone oxytocin: Hormone receptor binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(17), 1–19 (2008).
Stevenson, M. J., Uyeda, K. S., Harder, N. H. O. & Heffern, M. C. Metal-dependent hormone function: The emerging interdisciplinary field of metalloendocrinology. Metallomics https://doi.org/10.1039/c8mt00221e (2019).
Kleszczewski, T. et al. Cu(II) complexation does not affect oxytocin action on pregnant human myometrium in vitro. Reprod. Toxicol. 59, 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.11.004 (2016).
Liu, D. et al. Oxytocin-receptor binding: why divalent metals are essential. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(7), 2024–2025. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja046042v (2005).
Joly, L. et al. Optical and structural properties of copper–oxytocin dications in the gas phase. J. Phys. Chem. B 113(32), 11293–11300. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9037478 (2009).
Liu, D. et al. Oxytocin-receptor binding: Why divalent metals are essential. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(7), 2024–2025. https://doi.org/10.1021/JA046042V (2005).
Bal, W., Kozlowski, H., Lammek, B., Rolka, K. & Pettit, L. D. Potentiometric and spectroscopic studies of the Cu(II) complexes of Ala-Arg8-vasopressin and oxytocin: Two vasopressin-like peptides. J. Inorg. Biochem. 45(3), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-0134(92)80044-V (1992).
Bal, W. et al. A dramatic change in the interaction of Cu(II) with bio-peptides promoted by SDS-a model for complex formation on a membrane surface. J. Inorg. Biochem. 55(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-0134(94)85131-X (1994).
Yitzchaik, S., Gutierrez, R., Cuniberti, G. & Yerushalmi, R. Diversification of device platforms by molecular layers: Hybrid sensing platforms, monolayer doping, and modeling. Langmuir 34(47), 14103–14123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02369 (2018).
Mervinetsky, E. et al. A zinc selective oxytocin based biosensor. J. Mater. Chem. B 8(1), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb01932d (2020).
Tadi, K. K. et al. Oxytocin-monolayer-based impedimetric biosensor for zinc and copper ions. ACS Omega 2(12), 8770–8778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01404 (2017).
So, C. R. et al. Controlling self-assembly of engineered peptides on graphite by rational mutation. ACS Nano 6(2), 1648–1656. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn204631x (2012).
Jorgenson, T. D., Milligan, M., Sarikaya, M. & Overney, R. M. Conformationally directed assembly of peptides on 2D surfaces mediated by thermal stimuli. Soft Matter 15(37), 7360–7368. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM00426B (2019).
Dunbar, T. D. et al. Combined scanning tunneling microscopy and infrared spectroscopic characterization of mixed surface assemblies of linear conjugated guest molecules in host alkanethiolate monolayers on gold. J. Phys. Chem. B https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993724 (2000).
Vilan, A. Two layers are better than one. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0588-9 (2020).
Debono, R. F., Loucks, G. D., Della Manna, D. & Krull, U. J. Self-assembly of short and long-chain n-alkyl thiols onto gold surfaces: A real-time study using surface plasmon resonance techniques. Can. J. Chem. 74(5), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1139/v96-073 (1996).
Laibinis, P. E. et al. Comparison of the structures and wetting properties of self-assembled monolayers of n-alkanethiols on the coinage metal surfaces, Cu, Ag, Au1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 7152–7167 (1991).
Stevens, J. S. et al. Quantitative analysis of complex amino acids and RGD peptides by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Surf. Interface Anal. 45(8), 1238–1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5261 (2013).
Sirtori, V., Zambon, F. & Lombardi, L. XPS and ellipsometric characterization of Zinc-BTA complex. J. Electron. Mater. 29(4), 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-000-0162-9 (2000).
Mathew, S. P., Pai, V. S., Usha, G. & Nadig, R. R. Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by chitosan and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid when used as irrigant and its effect on root dentine: An in vitro atomic force microscopic and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. J. Conserv. Dent. 20(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_269_16 (2017).
Fender, T. et al. The assessment of organic matter Young’s modulus distribution with depositional environment and maturity. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jb020435 (2020).
Xing, Y. F., Li, S. F. Y., Lau, A. K. H. & O’Shea, S. J. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study of mixed thiol monolayers on gold. J. Electroanal. Chem. 583(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.05.010 (2005).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the RECORD-IT project. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 664786. S.Y. would like to thank the Benjamin H. Birstein Chair in Chemistry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.A. performed the surface assembly, ellipsometry, contact angle, impedimetric measurements, analyzed the results and wrote the initial draft. S.N. conducted AFM and contact angle measurements. A.G.D. synthesized the Dd-OT. E.M. and I.A. evaluate data analyses and interpretation. M.R., M.H. and S.Y. supervised the research. All authors participated in writing the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Attia, J., Nir, S., Mervinetsky, E. et al. Non-covalently embedded oxytocin in alkanethiol monolayer as Zn2+ selective biosensor. Sci Rep 11, 7051 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85015-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85015-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.