Abstract
Polarization of T cells towards the antigen presenting cell (APC) is critically important for appropriate activation and differentiation of the naïve T cell. Here we used imaging flow cytometry (IFC) and show that the activation induced Lck and Itk adapter T cell specific adapter protein (TSAd), encoded by SH2D2A, modulates polarization of T cells towards the APC. Upon exposure to APC presenting the cognate antigen Id, Sh2d2a−/− CD4+ T cells expressing Id-specific transgenic T cell receptor (TCR), displayed impaired polarization of F-actin and TCR to the immunological synapse (IS). Sh2d2a−/− T-cells that did polarize F-actin and TCR still displayed impaired polarization of PKCξ, PAR3 and the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC). In vitro differentiation of activated Sh2d2a−/− T cells was skewed towards an effector memory (Tem) rather than a central memory (Tcm) phenotype. A similar trend was observed for Id-specific TCR Sh2d2a−/− T cells stimulated with APC and cognate antigen. Taken together our data suggest that TSAd modulates differentiation of experienced T cells possibly through polarization of CD4+ T cells towards the APC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Upon stimulation of T cells via TCR and other surface receptors, initiation of signalling cascades eventually results in proliferation and differentiation into various T cell phenotypes1. The molecular details for how signalling in T cells is controlled after the initial triggering of the TCR is not fully understood.
TCR binding to its cognate antigen-MHC complex on antigen presenting cells may result in formation of an immunological synapse (IS) at the interface between the T cell and the APC. IS formation is dependent on localized intracellular signals that results in cytoskeletal and membrane reorganization towards the contact site (reviewed in2). Polarisation of actin, TCR and signalling molecules towards the IS are required for proper activation and function of T cells, where CD4+ T cells engage with the APC for several hours1. Sustained TCR signalling is subsequently maintained through recycling TCR and Lck to the IS during activation3,4, until signal termination by negative feedback mechanisms or TCR degradation5,6. Providing a critical regulatory stimulus, the IS facilitates differentiation of T cells into Tem or Tcm subsets,1,7,8.
Interruption of IS formation may skew or disrupt CD8+ T cell differentiation9,10,11,12. Upon triggering of the TCR, formation of the IS initially involves reorganising the actin cytoskeleton towards the cell interface, followed by movement of TCR micro-clusters towards the centre of the IS (cSMAC). As the IS matures, polymerized actin reorganises and relocates to the periphery (dSMAC) while microtubule organizing centre (MTOC) reorients to a position beneath the IS (reviewed in13).
A novel player in regulation of T cell polarity, may be the cytosolic Lck and Itk adapter TSAd14, encoded by SH2D2A. We recently found that lack of TSAd is associated with reduced accumulation of F-actin at the interphase between CD4+ T cells and APC14. TSAd is induced in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells upon engagement of the TCR15,16. However, the role of TSAd in activated T cells is only partially understood. TSAd affects proximal T cell signalling events via its interaction with Lck16,17, possibly by promoting phosphorylation of Lck Tyr192 by Itk14. TSAd also regulates chemokine induced T cell migration and actin polymerization via its interaction with Itk18.
Despite TSAd being involved in TCR signalling, unchallenged Sh2d2a−/− mice display only minor alteration in overall immune phenotype15,19,20. TSAd may influence specific NK cell immune responses, since Sh2d2a−/− mice displayed reduced clearance of a mutant murine cytomegalovirus which does not activate the NK cell receptor Ly49H21. Recently, we found that TSAd affects CD4+ T cell-mediated rejection of experimental multiple myeloma19. Wild type mice are highly susceptible to MOPC315 myeloma, while mice carrying transgenic TCR, recognizing a peptide (Id) derived from the variable region of the L chain of the MOPC315 IgA (Id-specific TCR), are partially protected22. The Id-peptide is presented on I-Ed by tumor-infiltrating macrophages. Rejection is caused by interplay of Th1 T cells and M1-activated macrophages23. The Sh2d2a−/− Id-specific TCR mice displayed increased resistance towards myeloma19, however the molecular mechanism for the increased resistance remains to be determined.
We here examined the hypothesis that TSAd regulates T cell differentiation through altered polarization of T cells towards APC. Using imaging flow cytometry (IFC), the distribution of signalling molecules towards the IS in T-cell/APC conjugates was assessed19. We found that in Id-specific TCR T cells, TSAd affected actin polymerization as well as polarization of TCR, PKCξ and MTOC at the IS. Our results suggest that altered polarization of T cells may influence differentiation of effector and memory T cells.
Results
TSAd is continuously expressed in activated T cells
We previously demonstrated increased resistance towards experimental myeloma in the absence of TSAd19. Resistance towards myeloma in this model is driven by tumor-specific Th1 cells which activate tumor-infiltrating antigen-presenting macrophages24,25. TSAd expression is induced in T cells upon activation through the TCR/CD3 complex15,16. To begin to explore the molecular mechanism for increased resistance to myeloma in the absence of TSAd, we thus first asked whether TSAd continues to be expressed in proliferating T cells. The amount of TSAd in CD3/CD28 activated human CD4+ T cells was measured in dividing cells using CTV dilution combined with intracellular staining for TSAd. TSAd was found to be expressed at the same level over several generations of proliferating human CD4+ cells (Fig. 1A) indicating that this intracellular Lck-adapter potentially could affect T cell proliferation, differentiation or cell survival.
TSAd promotes differentiation of Th1 cells with a central memory phenotype
Having found that TSAd is continuously expressed in proliferating T cells, we next asked whether TSAd affects the proliferation and phenotype of activated CD4+ T cells. Previous studies of short term stimulated TSAd deficient T cells have revealed conflicting results15,18,20. Here we stimulated murine Sh2d2a+/+ or Sh2d2a−/− CD4+ T cells from C57/BL6 mice for three days using anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activator beads as a surrogate for APC, followed by incubation with IL-2 for six days to promote cytokine mediated proliferation26 (Fig. 1B and C). Live cells were counted at the indicated times, and the frequency of live cells expressing CD44 and CD62L was analysed by flow cytometry in order to assess the size of the T cell populations with a central memory phenotype (i.e. Tcm or CD44high/CD62Lhigh) and an effector memory phenotype (i.e. Tem or CD44high/CD62Low) (Fig. 1B and C). Over the nine days of IL-2 stimulation, the accumulated proliferation of Sh2d2A−/−CD4+ T cells was significantly lower than that of Sh2d2a+/+ CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1C). Moreover, the cultured Sh2d2a−/− CD4+ T cells were significant skewed towards a Tem phenotype as compared to Sh2d2a+/+ CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1D). Similarly, Sh2d2a−/− Id-specific TCR transgenic CD4+ T cells19,27 cultured under Th1 stimulating conditions in the presence of Id-peptide loaded APCs from Sh2d2a+/+ spleens22, displayed a significantly reduced accumulated proliferative response compared to the corresponding Sh2d2a+/+ Id-specific TCR CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1E). These same cells showed a trend towards skewed Tem differentiation (Fig. 1F). Taken together, these data suggests that TSAd influences cytokine mediated proliferation and differentiation of T cells.
TSAd regulates polarization of F-actin in antigen stimulated CD4+ T cells
Asymmetric distribution of signalling molecules in APC-conjugated T cells have previously been associated with subsequent differentiation of T cells into Tcm and Tem cells8. TSAd regulates actin polymerization at the interphase between T cell and APC14. As TSAd is continuously expressed in activated T cells over multiple cell divisions, and since cytokine mediated proliferation of Sh2d2a−/− T cells is diminished compared to Sh2d2a+/+ T cells, we thus asked whether TSAd affects the polarization of critical molecules towards the IS in experienced T cells. Briefly, to generate IS-positive Id-specific T:APC-conjugates in vitro Id-specific TCR CD4+ T cell blasts were used to ensure adequate expression of TSAd (Fig. 1A) and its interaction partner Itk14. SNARF-labeled T cells were co-incubated with A20 lymphoma cells or F9 lymphoma cells expressing Id-peptides bound to I-Ed (F9 is a derivative of A20) as APC for 30 minutes (for details see Materials and Methods). After staining with Id-specific TCR specific antibody and phalloidin labelling F-actin, cells were analysed by IFC. T-cells conjugated to APC were examined for polarisation of F-actin to the IS (Fig. 2A and B). Polarisation of F-actin was determined by comparing the signal in the synapse mask to the signal in the whole cell (see Materials and methods for details). In line with our previous finding14, significantly fewer conjugated Sh2d2a−/− T cells polarised F-actin to the IS compared to Sh2d2a+/+ T cells (Fig. 2C and D). However, among conjugated T cells displaying polarized F-actin, the degree of polarized F-actin, as assessed by the median polarisation ratio, was no significant difference in Sh2d2a−/− compared to Sh2d2a+/+ T cells (Fig. 2E).
TSAd regulates polarization of TCR to the IS
Presence of polarized F-actin on the T cell side of the Id-specific T:APC contact area was defined as a marker for IS-positive T cells. TCR is known to accumulate at the centre of the mature IS13. We thus considered that accumulation of the Id-specific TCR at the IS may be a marker for a maturing synapse. When analysing IS-positive Id-specific T:APC conjugates, formed after 30 minutes of co-incubation of T cells with APC, for accumulation of TCR at the IS (Fig. 2F), we found that IS-positive Sh2d2a−/− T cells displayed significantly fewer Id-specific T:APC conjugates with polarized TCR than their Sh2d2a+/+ counterpart (Fig. 2G and H). However, although the median polarisation ratio of TCR also was lower in Sh2d2a−/− T cells compared to Sh2d2a+/+ T cells displaying a maturing IS, this difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 2I). No significant differences in the frequency of T-APC conjugates with polarized F-actin or TCR was observed between Sh2d2a+/+ and Sh2d2a−/− T cells when A20 cells lacking Id was used as APC (Fig. 2C and G and data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate a deficiency of IS maturation in the absence of TSAd.
TSAd regulates polarization of polarity proteins in T cells
T cell polarity28,29,30,31,32 is controlled by highly conserved intracellular polarity proteins known as the Scribble (including Scrib and SAP97) and PAR3 (including PAR3, PKCξ and PKCθ) protein complexes respectively. These polarity complexes define distinct spatial regions of the cell through differential localisation of macromolecules. There is accumulating evidence that the PAR3 complex modulates T cell polarisation, migration and IS formation29,30,31,33,34. In order to examine whether polarisation complexes were affected by the absence of TSAd, we analysed Id-specific T:APC conjugates with a maturing IS (displaying accumulation of F-actin and TCR) for distribution of PAR3, PKCξ, PKCθ, Scrib or SAP97 (Fig. 2J). In Id-specific T:APC conjugates having a maturing IS after 30 minutes of co-incubation of T cells with APC, there was no significant difference in the frequency of conjugates displaying asymmetric distribution of polarity complexes within the T cell (Fig. 2K). However, the proportions of PKCξ and SCRIB polarised towards the synapse in the conjugates, as measured by their median polarisation ratios, were significantly lower in Sh2d2a−/− than in Sh2d2a+/+ T cells (Fig. 2L). In Id-specific T:APC conjugates involving A20 cells, there were no significant differences (data not shown).
TSAd promotes re-localization of MTOC to the maturing IS of CD4+ T cells
The relocation of MTOC to beneath the interface between the T cell and the APC is a hallmark of a mature IS13. Having found that Sh2d2a−/− T cells displayed reduced frequency of conjugates with polarised F-actin, TCR and reduced polarisation of the PAR3 complex member PKCξ to the IS, we went on to assess the relocation of the MTOC in Id-specific T:APC conjugates. T cells and APC’s were co-incubated for 30 minutes, followed by visualization of MTOC by intracellular staining for γ-tubulin. The maturing IS was defined as previously described, using phalloidin and anti-TCR staining of the conjugates (Figs 2A and 3A). The intensity ratio of γ-tubulin at the synapse was assessed as previously described (Figs 2A, 3B and Materials and methods).The frequency of conjugates displaying MTOC re-localisation beneath the IS in T cells was significantly lower in Sh2d2a−/− compared to Sh2d2a+/+ T cells (Fig. 3C). However, once the MTOC was polarised, the proportion of γ-tubulin signal relocating to the IS was not significantly different in Sh2d2a−/− T cells compared to that observed in Sh2d2a+/+ (Fig. 3D).
TSAd influences the kinetics of F-actin, TCR, PKCξ and MTOC polarisation in CD4+ T cells
Having found that maturation of the IS was affected in Sh2d2a−/− T cells early after conjugation with APC, we proceeded to analyse the kinetics of IS maturation in Sh2d2a+/+ and Sh2d2a−/− T cells over a 12 hour time course, including also the polarisation of the polarity proteins PAR3 and PKCξ (Fig. 4). As previously, T cells and Id-positive APC (F9 cells) were co-incubated for the indicated time points, followed by staining with the indicated antibodies. The initial reduced frequency of Sh2d2a−/− T cells displaying polarized F-actin as well as the relative amount of F-actin polarized to the IS in conjugated Sh2d2a−/− T cells was not observed at later time points (Fig. 4A and B). Similarly, the difference in frequency of TCR polarised conjugates towards IS was not observed at later time points (Fig. 4C). As already noted, the relative amount of TCR accumulated towards the synapse was not significantly different at early time points and remained so throughout the entire time course (Fig. 4D). The frequency of conjugates with PKCξ polarised towards the mature IS was similar in Sh2d2a−/− and Sh2d2a+/+ T cells over the course of the experiment (Fig. 4E), while the reduced amount of polarized PKCξ in Sh2d2a−/− was only observed for up to 60 minutes of Id-specific T:APC co-culture (Fig. 4F). Both the frequency of conjugates with PAR3 at the IS, as well as the amount of PAR3 polarised towards the mature IS, was significantly lower in Sh2d2a−/− only at the latest time point tested (720 minutes) (Fig. 5G and H). The frequency of conjugates with polarized γ-tubulin was significantly lower in Sh2d2a−/− over the course of the experiment (Fig. 4I). However once polarisation occurred, γ-tubulin was similarly polarised as assessed by polarisation ratio, irrespective of TSAd (Fig. 4J). There were no significant differences in polarisation in the absence of Id presentation (data not shown). Taken together, these results support a role for TSAd in regulating maturation and organisation of the IS at early time points during initial T cell:APC interaction.
IFNγ is reduced in antigen stimulated Sh2d2a−/−Id-specific TCR T cells
Cytokine secretion is a crucial part of T cell effector function. Several cytokines are polarised and secreted through the IS, including IFNγ35. Polarisation of IFNγ to the IS is dependent on polarisation of F-actin, but not MTOC reorientation35,36. Having found that TSAd influences accumulation of polarized F-actin as well as members of the PAR3 polarity complex to the IS, we examined whether Sh2d2a−/− also affected IFNγ during T cell:APC interaction.
As above Id-specific TCR T blasts and APC were co-incubated for the indicated time points and subsequently stained intracellularly for IFNγ- F-actin and TCR. IFNγ expression in Id-specific TCR T cells with maturing IS was assessed (Fig. 5A). After 30 minutes incubation, both Sh2d2a+/+ and Sh2d2a−/− Id-specific T:APC conjugates displayed intracellular IFNγ (Fig. 5B,C). The number of IFNγ expressing Sh2d2a+/+ T cells varied throughout the experiment, while after 720 minutes of incubation significantly fewer Sh2d2a−/− T cells were expressing IFNγ (Fig. 5C). Taken together, the effect of TSAd on IS-formation and T cell differentiation includes a positive effect on amount of IFNγ-in antigen stimulated CD4+ T cells.
Discussion
Polarisation of signalling molecules in the triggered T cell towards the APC is crucial for normal activation and function of T cells. Here we have shown that the Lck-adapter TSAd is required in the early phases in the T cell’s interaction with APC. Absence of TSAd results in altered differentiation and proliferation of activated T cells in vitro.
In this study, we mainly used imaging flow cytometry, which allows for the rapid and unbiased analysis of large numbers of Id-specific T:APC conjugates. Though the resolution of IFC is inferior to confocal microscopy, the method permits quantitative high throughput analysis of Id-specific T:APC conjugates, without encountering issues of photo-bleaching and observer bias in identifying Id-specific T:APC conjugates associated with confocal microscopy.
A key feature of TSAd is that it is rapidly induced upon activation of the T cells. Resting T cells display low levels, while recently activated T cells express high levels of TSAd. In T cells primed via inflammatory cAMP inducing signals, TSAd protein expression may be induced already 15 minutes after initial TCR triggering of primary resting T cells37. Here we show that expression of TSAd is stably maintained over several cell divisions, and that absence of TSAd results in reduced proliferation and a significant skewing towards effector T cell phenotype. This support the notion that TSAd also regulates T cells after the initiation of TCR stimulation. Although reduced proliferation of Sh2d2a−/− T cells in response to TCR-triggered activation was initially reported15, a significant difference in short term anti-CD3/anti-CD28 stimulated T cell proliferation has not consistently been observed19. Our present data strongly indicates that TSAd may impact the T cell phenotype upon long term or chronic immune challenges.
The main finding of this study is that TSAd regulates polarization of key molecules, including actin and members of the PAR3 complex, to the IS in T cells during early APC interactions. This results in altered MTOC polarisation, as well as IFNγ expression. Secretion of IFNγ at the IS is dependent on actin remodelling36. Intracellular vesicles associated to the GTPases Rab3d and Rab19 traffic IFNγ for secretion at the IS35. Whether these GTPases are also affected by the presence of TSAd remains to be studied.
Altered polarization of T cells towards the APC may represent a possible molecular mechanism for the improved resistance of Sh2d2a−/− Id-specific TCR transgenic mice towards experimental myeloma that we previously observed19. IFNγ is a major effector cytokine produced by CD4+ T cells, which can induce tumor-killing macrophages24,25. Elimination of the MHC negative plasmacytoma MOPC315 involves indirect recognition by CD4+ T cells of tumor antigen presented by infiltrating macrophages25,38,39, followed by differentiation of cytotoxic macrophages through direct contact with the T cells39,40. Our data suggest that altered cytoskeletal and polarisation dynamics in TSAd deficient CD4+ T cells during APC interactions could provide reduced secretion of IFNγ at the IS. It is thus possible that the improved tumor rejection in TSAd deficient Id-specific TCR transgenic T cells19 is caused by diffuse instead of polarized secretion of IFNγ during CD4+ T cell interactions with APC. In conjunction with a more slowly dividing effector T cells population, this may lead to improved and persistent recruitment of cytotoxic macrophages and increased tumor killing24,38,40,41. Whether recruitment of cytotoxic macrophages and bystander killing of the plasmacytoma cells is affected by lack of TSAd need to be explored39,40.
Our present data show that TSAd modulates early polarisation of the cytoskeleton as well as MTOC re-arrangement in T cells, however the molecular mechanism for how TSAd affects polarity of T cells remains to be determined. TSAd is an adapter for both Lck and Itk and promotes phosphorylation of Itk by Lck18 and phosphorylation of Lck Tyr192 by Itk14. T cells expressing Lck Phe192 displayed reduced ability to form conjugates with antigen presenting cells14. Lck is required for actin polarisation and MTOC reorientation upon TCR engagement42.
Cdc4243,44 is a key GTPase for establishing cell polarity45,46. Lck and Itk mediated signalling upon TCR stimulation is required for Cdc42-WASP controlled actin polarisation towards the IS44. TSAd also promotes recruitment of Lck and SLP-76 to Nck47. SLP-76 and Nck coordinates WASP recruitment to Cdc4243. Cdc42 controls polarity of cells through activation of multiple polarity pathways, including the PAR3 polarity complex48.
It is likely that the alterations in actin and polarity complex polarization in the Sh2d2a−/− T cells are mechanistically linked to the overall reduced MTOC polarisation observed in the same cells. Though the mechanism for MTOC reorientation in T cells remains unclear, it appears to involve motor protein activity and polarity complex interactions49,50. It was recently proposed that Arp2/3 mediated actin nucleation tethers MTOC to the nucleus, through the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex51. During TCR stimulation Arp2/3 is recruited to the plasma membrane, resulting in local depletion of Arp2/3 and release of MTOC from the nucleus, allowing for its reorientation towards the IS51.
Taken together, it is conceivable that the change in TCR induced polarisation dynamics observed in Sh2d2a−/− CD4+ T cells is ultimately linked to altered Lck signalling, and downstream Itk and Nck mediated cytoskeletal polarisation14,47 (depicted in Fig. 652,53). However, whether TSAd modulates downstream polarization events through a Cdc42-dependent mechanism remains to be determined.
Conclusion
Polarisation of T cells towards the APC and altered expression on IFNγ in conjugated T cells stimulated with cognate antigen is regulated by the Lck adapter TSAd. This may explain why TSAd deficiency is associated with increased resistance towards tumors where IFNγ dependent macrophage mediated cytotoxicity is crucial.
Materials and Methods
Ethical Statements
All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The animals were bred under conventional conditions, regularly screened for common pathogens and housed in compliance with guidelines set by the Experimental Animal Board under the Ministry of Agriculture of Norway. All experimental protocols involving transgenic and wild type animals were approved by the National Committee for Animal Experiments (Oslo, Norway). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy, adult, anonymous blood donors. Informed consent was obtained from all blood donors. The study was approved by the regional ethics committee (REK no S-09325b).
Antibodies and reagents
Antibodies used were anti-human CD3ε (OKT3, American Type Culture collection, Manassas, VA), anti-CD28 (clone CD28.2, BD Biosciences), and anti-TSAd-DyLight 488 (clone OTI3C7, Origene), anti–IL-4 (11B11, Bio X Cell), anti-IFNγ-FITC, anti-CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5 (RM4–5) and anti-CD44-FITC (KM201, BD), anti-CD62L-PE (MEL-14, Southern Biotech), anti-γ–tubulin (GTU-88, Sigma) and anti- Id-specific TCR-PE (GB11354). Polyclonal antibodies were anti-PAR3 (Cat# 07-330, Millipore), anti-PKCξ (Η - 1), anti-PKCθ (C-18), anti-Scrib (C-6) and anti-SAP97 (H-60, Santa Cruz). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-donkey, goat anti-rabbit or isotype specific anti-mouse conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cytkines were IL-2, IL-12 (Peprotech). Fluorescent markers were phalloidin Alexa Fluor 647, cell tracker violet (CTV), SNARF, LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR (all from Thermo Fisher).
Mice and Cell Lines
The Sh2d2a−/− C57BL/6 and Id-specific TCR transgenic BALB/c mice were previously described19. Briefly, Sh2d2a−/− mice on a mixed C57BL/6–129 background were backcrossed to C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice. Sh2d2−/+ BALB/c mice heterozygous for Id-specific TCR were crossed with Sh2d2a−/+ BALB/c mice to generate littermates both for studies of Id-specific TCR transgenic mice and normal BALB/c mice with or without Sh2d2a. The BALB/c MHC class II positive B cell lymphoma cell line A20 and F9 (A20 cells stably expressing Id+ λ2315 L chain55) were cultured in complete medium (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fatal calf serum (FCS), 1 mM non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all from GIBCOBRL®, Life Technologies™) and 50 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma)).
Purification of CD4+ T Cells
Human CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMC using Dynabeads® CD4 Positive Isolation Kit, (ThermoFisher). Murine CD4+ T cells were isolated from single cell suspensions of spleens using Dynabeads® Untouched™ Mouse CD4 Cells Kit (ThermoFisher). The composition of the recovered population was more than 90% CD4+ T cells as analysed by flow cytometry.
In vitro CD4+ T Cell Stimulation
Human CD4+ T cells were loaded with CTV before being stimulated with plate bound anti-CD3 (OKT3, 5 µg/ml) and soluble anti-CD28 (CD28.2, 1 µg/ml) in complete medium containing 30 U/ml IL-2 for 4 days. Cells were then stained with anti-TSAd-DyLight 488 and analysed by flow cytometry. Dividing cells were identified by CTV dilution. Murine CD4+ T cells were stimulated with Dynabeads® Mouse T-Activator CD3/CD28 beads (ThermoFisher), bead: cell ratio = 1:1 in complete medium containing 30 U/ml IL-2. CD3/CD28 beads were removed after 3 days in vitro and cultured in the presence of IL2 (30 U/ml) for another 7 days. Live cells were counted by trypan blue dye exclusion using a TC20 automated cell counter (Bio-Rad), and phenotyped by flow cytometry at 0, 3, 7 and 9 days in vitro. Surface staining was performed using CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD44-FITC and CD62L-PE in FACS buffer (2% FCS, 0,1% sodium azide in PBS) at 4 °C. Cells were stained subsequently with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR to exclude dead cell, fixed for 10 minutes with 2% PFA in FACS buffer, and acquired on a FACSCantoII. Data was analysed using FlowJo version 7.6 (Tree Star Inc.), where live cells were gated on CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5 followed by analysis of CD44-FITC and CD62L-PE.
Th1 differentiation assay
Id-specific TCR transgenic Th1 cells were obtained as previously described27. Briefly, splenic CD4+ T cells were cultured with 10 μg/mL anti–IL-4, 20 ng/mL IL-12 together with irradiated wild type splenocytes loaded with Id peptide as APC (1:3 T cell to APC ratio). The Id-peptide comprises residues 91–101 of the λ2315 L chain corresponding to CDR3. Mutated residues 94, 95, 96 are crucial for I-Ed-restricted stimulation of Id-specific TCR transgenic CD4+ T cells56,57. Live cells were counted using a TC20 automated cell counter as above, at 0, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days in vitro before being phenotyped as described above on day 10.
Conjugation assay
CD4+ T cells from Id-specific TCR transgenic BALB/c mice expanded for 5 days using CD3/CD28 beads, were rested for 48 hours in the absence of beads before being stimulated with irradiated (2500 rad) F9 or A20 cells. F9 cells presenting Id-peptide on MHC II strongly activates Id-specific TCR transgenic CD4+ T cells22. CD4+ T cells were labelled with 0,1 µM SNARF as per manufacturers instructions. The parental A20 cell line was used as a negative control. 1 × 106 A20 or F9 target cells were co-cultured with 0,6 × 106 Id-specific T cells in complete medium in 96 well U-bottom plates. Cells were centrifuged at 70 × g for 1 minute and incubated for indicated time points at 37 °C before stimulation. All subsequent pipetting was done gently with wide bore 200 µl pipette tips (VWR). Cells were stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR before being fixed with 2% PFA for 10 minutes, or fixed and permeabilised for 5 minutes with Acetone at −20 °C in case of γ–tubulin staining, followed by GB113-PE staining which binds Id-specific TCR (mAb; GB11354), at 10 µg/ml in FACS buffer for 30 minutes. Cells were then permeabilised and stained with FACS buffer containing 0,1% Saponin, 6,25U/ml Phalloidin Alexa Fluor 647 in combination with 1 µg/ml of one of the following antibodies: PAR3, PKCξ, PKCθ, Scrib, SAP97 (Santa Cruz), anti-γ–tubulin (Sigma) or IFNγ-FITC (BD). Cells were then washed and stained when necessary with secondary antibody goat anti-donkey, goat anti-rabbit or isotype specific anti-mouse conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) together with DAPI. Cells were washed and stored in PBS, 0,1% NaAzide at 4 C until run on ImageStream X.
Imagestream acquisition and analysis
Samples were acquired at 40x magnification on a four-laser, twelve channel, ASSIST calibrated ImageStream X (Amnis, Seattle, WA) imaging flow cytometer. 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm and 658 nm laser excitations were set to avoid pixel saturation. Single stained controls were collected and used to generate a compensation matrix to correct for spectral crosstalk. Data was analysed using IDEAS v6.1, where the T cell mask was defined based on the signal of the cell tracker SNARF. Live cells were identified by viability dye exclusion, and GB113 positive cells identified Id-specific TCR transgenic T cells. The aspect ratio and area of the DAPI signal was used to identify images containing two cells58. Selecting images with a high SNARF (T cell) intensity and aspect ratio was then done to identify images containing 1 T cell58. Using the “Interface” masking function in IDEAS58 the T cell synapse of the T cell was defined in all the images (Fig. 2A). Marker polarisation towards the synapse was quantified by calculating the average fluorescent signal in the synapse masks as a ratio to the average fluorescent signal of the whole T cell. To adjust for cell-to-cell variation in the size of the synapse mask, the signals were normalised against the area of the respective masks. A threshold ratio above 1,5 was defined as the fluorescent marker being polarised to the IS, based on the polarisation ratio of the uniformly distributed cell tracker SNARF (not shown).
Statistical analysis
The data was exported and graphed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). To assess statistical significance, a two-tailed Student’s t-test was applied to compare two normally distributed datasets while two-way analysis of variance was applied to datasets with multiple time points. A significance level of 0,05 was used.
References
Ueda, H., Morphew, M. K., McIntosh, J. R. & Davis, M. M. CD4+T-cell synapses involve multiple distinct stages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 17099–17104, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113703108 (2011).
Angus, K. L. & Griffiths, G. M. Cell polarisation and the immunological synapse. Current opinion in cell biology 25, 85–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.08.013 (2013).
Soares, H. et al. Regulated vesicle fusion generates signaling nanoterritories that control T cell activation at the immunological synapse. The Journal of experimental medicine 210, 2415–2433, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20130150 (2013).
Crotzer, V. L., Mabardy, A. S., Weiss, A. & Brodsky, F. M. T cell receptor engagement leads to phosphorylation of clathrin heavy chain during receptor internalization. The Journal of experimental medicine 199, 981–991, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20031105 (2004).
Acuto, O., Di Bartolo, V. & Michel, F. Tailoring T-cell receptor signals by proximal negative feedback mechanisms. Nature reviews. Immunology 8, 699–712, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2397 (2008).
Simeoni, L. et al. Control of lymphocyte development and activation by negative regulatory transmembrane adapter proteins. Immunological reviews 224, 215–228, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00656.x (2008).
Huppa, J. B. & Davis, M. M. T-cell-antigen recognition and the immunological synapse. Nature reviews. Immunology 3, 973–983, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1245 (2003).
Chang, J. T. et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science (New York, N.Y.) 315, 1687–1691, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139393 (2007).
Gerard, A. et al. Secondary T cell-T cell synaptic interactions drive the differentiation of protective CD8+ T cells. Nature immunology 14, 356–363, https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2547 (2013).
Teixeiro, E. et al. Different T cell receptor signals determine CD8+ memory versus effector development. Science (New York, N.Y.) 323, 502–505, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163612 (2009).
Scholer, A., Hugues, S., Boissonnas, A., Fetler, L. & Amigorena, S. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1-dependent stable interactions between T cells and dendritic cells determine CD8+ T cell memory. Immunity 28, 258–270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.016 (2008).
Anton van der Merwe, P., Davis, S. J., Shaw, A. S. & Dustin, M. L. Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition. Seminars in immunology 12, 5–21 (2000).
Le Floc’h, A. & Huse, M. Molecular mechanisms and functional implications of polarized actin remodeling at the T cell immunological synapse. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS 72, 537–556, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1760-7 (2015).
Granum, S. et al. The kinase Itk and the adaptor TSAd change the specificity of the kinase Lck in T cells by promoting the phosphorylation of Tyr192. Science signaling 7, ra118, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2005384 (2014).
Rajagopal, K. et al. RIBP, a novel Rlk/Txk- and itk-binding adaptor protein that regulates T cell activation. The Journal of experimental medicine 190, 1657–1668 (1999).
Sundvold, V. et al. T cell-specific adapter protein inhibits T cell activation by modulating Lck activity. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. 1950) 165, 2927–2931 (2000).
Granum, S. et al. Modulation of Lck function through multisite docking to T cell-specific adapter protein. The Journal of biological chemistry 283, 21909–21919, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M800871200 (2008).
Berge, T. et al. T cell specific adapter protein (TSAd) interacts with Tec kinase ITK to promote CXCL12 induced migration of human and murine T cells. PloS one 5, e9761, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009761 (2010).
Berge, T. et al. SH2D2A modulates T cell mediated protection to a B cell derived tumor in transgenic mice. PloS one 7, e48239, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048239 (2012).
Perchonock, C. E., Pajerowski, A. G., Nguyen, C., Shapiro, M. J. & Shapiro, V. S. The related adaptors, adaptor in lymphocytes of unknown function X and Rlk/Itk-binding protein, have nonredundant functions in lymphocytes. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. 1950) 179, 1768–1775 (2007).
Moussa, P. et al. Reduced MCMV Deltam157 viral clearance in the absence of TSAd. Scientific reports 5, 9219, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09219 (2015).
Lauritzsen, G. F., Weiss, S., Dembic, Z. & Bogen, B. Naive idiotype-specific CD4+ T cells and immunosurveillance of B-cell tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91, 5700–5704 (1994).
Haabeth, O. A. et al. How Do CD4(+) T Cells Detect and Eliminate Tumor Cells That Either Lack or Express MHC Class II Molecules? Frontiers in immunology 5, 174, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00174 (2014).
Corthay, A. et al. Primary antitumor immune response mediated by CD4+ T cells. Immunity 22, 371–383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.02.003 (2005).
Corthay, A., Lundin, K. U., Lorvik, K. B., Hofgaard, P. O. & Bogen, B. Secretion of tumor-specific antigen by myeloma cells is required for cancer immunosurveillance by CD4+ T cells. Cancer research 69, 5901–5907, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4816 (2009).
Surh, C. D. & Sprent, J. Homeostasis of naive and memory T cells. Immunity 29, 848–862, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.002 (2008).
Dembic, Z., Rottingen, J. A., Dellacasagrande, J., Schenck, K. & Bogen, B. Phagocytic dendritic cells from myelomas activate tumor-specific T cells at a single cell level. Blood 97, 2808–2814 (2001).
Arsenio, J., Metz, P. J. & Chang, J. T. Asymmetric Cell Division in T Lymphocyte Fate Diversification. Trends in immunology 36, 670–683, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2015.09.004 (2015).
Ludford-Menting, M. J. et al. A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation. Immunity 22, 737–748, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.009 (2005).
Krummel, M. F. & Macara, I. Maintenance and modulation of T cell polarity. Nature immunology 7, 1143–1149, https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1404 (2006).
Lin, J., Hou, K. K., Piwnica-Worms, H. & Shaw, A. S. The polarity protein Par1b/EMK/MARK2 regulates T cell receptor-induced microtubule-organizing center polarization. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. 1950) 183, 1215–1221, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803887 (2009).
Humbert, P. O., Dow, L. E. & Russell, S. M. The Scribble and Par complexes in polarity and migration: friends or foes? Trends in cell biology 16, 622–630, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.10.005 (2006).
Ludford-Menting, M. J. et al. The Reorientation of T-Cell Polarity and Inhibition of Immunological Synapse Formation by CD46 Involves Its Recruitment to Lipid Rafts. Journal of lipids 2011, 521863, https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/521863 (2011).
Oliaro, J. et al. Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. 1950) 185, 367–375, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903627 (2010).
Huse, M., Lillemeier, B. F., Kuhns, M. S., Chen, D. S. & Davis, M. M. T cells use two directionally distinct pathways for cytokine secretion. Nature immunology 7, 247–255, https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1304 (2006).
Chemin, K. et al. Cytokine secretion by CD4+ T cells at the immunological synapse requires Cdc42-dependent local actin remodeling but not microtubule organizing center polarity. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md.: 1950) 189, 2159–2168, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1200156 (2012).
Kolltveit, K. M. et al. Expression of SH2D2A in T-cells is regulated both at the transcriptional and translational level. Molecular immunology 45, 2380–2390, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2007.11.005 (2008).
Haabeth, O. A. et al. Inflammation driven by tumour-specific Th1 cells protects against B-cell cancer. Nature communications 2, 240, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1239 (2011).
Tveita, A. A. et al. Indirect CD4+ T-cell-mediated elimination of MHC II(NEG) tumor cells is spatially restricted and fails to prevent escape of antigen-negative cells. European journal of immunology 44, 2625–2637, https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201444659 (2014).
Tveita, A. A., Schjesvold, F., Haabeth, O. A., Fauskanger, M. & Bogen, B. Tumors Escape CD4+ T-cell-Mediated Immunosurveillance by Impairing the Ability of Infiltrating Macrophages to Indirectly Present Tumor Antigens. Cancer research 75, 3268–3278, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-3640 (2015).
Tveita, A. A., Haabeth, O. A. & Bogen, B. Limitations of bystander killing in Th1/M1 immune responses against a secreted tumor antigen. Oncoimmunology 3, e954953, https://doi.org/10.4161/21624011.2014.954953 (2014).
Lowin-Kropf, B., Shapiro, V. S. & Weiss, A. Cytoskeletal polarization of T cells is regulated by an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-dependent mechanism. The Journal of cell biology 140, 861–871 (1998).
Zeng, R. et al. SLP-76 coordinates Nck-dependent Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein recruitment with Vav-1/Cdc42-dependent Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein activation at the T cell-APC contact site. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. 1950) 171, 1360–1368 (2003).
Labno, C. M. et al. Itk functions to control actin polymerization at the immune synapse through localized activation of Cdc42 and WASP. Current biology: CB 13, 1619–1624 (2003).
Nelson, W. J. Remodeling epithelial cell organization: transitions between front-rear and apical-basal polarity. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 1, a000513, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000513 (2009).
Etienne-Manneville, S. Cdc42–the centre of polarity. Journal of cell science 117, 1291–1300, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01115 (2004).
Hem, C. D. et al. T cell specific adaptor protein (TSAd) promotes interaction of Nck with Lck and SLP-76 in T cells. Cell communication and signaling: CCS 13, 31, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-015-0109-7 (2015).
Cau, J. & Hall, A. Cdc42 controls the polarity of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons through two distinct signal transduction pathways. Journal of cell science 118, 2579–2587, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02385 (2005).
Liu, X., Kapoor, T. M., Chen, J. K. & Huse, M. Diacylglycerol promotes centrosome polarization in T cells via reciprocal localization of dynein and myosin II. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 11976–11981, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306180110 (2013).
Feldman, J. L. & Priess, J. R. A role for the centrosome and PAR-3 in the hand-off of MTOC function during epithelial polarization. Current biology: CB 22, 575–582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.044 (2012).
Obino, D. et al. Actin nucleation at the centrosome controls lymphocyte polarity. Nature communications 7, 10969, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10969 (2016).
Li, R. & Bowerman, B. Symmetry breaking in biology. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 2, a003475, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a003475 (2010).
Chen, J. & Zhang, M. The Par3/Par6/aPKC complex and epithelial cell polarity. Experimental cell research 319, 1357–1364, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.03.021 (2013).
Bogen, B., Lauritzsen, G. F. & Weiss, S. A stimulatory monoclonal antibody detecting T cell receptor diversity among idiotype-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted T cell clones. European journal of immunology 20, 2359–2362, https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830201030 (1990).
Weiss, S. & Bogen, B. B-lymphoma cells process and present their endogenous immunoglobulin to major histocompatibility complex-restricted T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 86, 282–286 (1989).
Bogen, B. & Lambris, J. D. Minimum length of an idiotypic peptide and a model for its binding to a major histocompatibility complex class II molecule. The EMBO journal 8, 1947–1952 (1989).
Bogen, B., Malissen, B. & Haas, W. Idiotope-specific T cell clones that recognize syngeneic immunoglobulin fragments in the context of class II molecules. European journal of immunology 16, 1373–1378, https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830161110 (1986).
Ahmed, F., Friend, S., George, T. C., Barteneva, N. & Lieberman, J. Numbers matter: quantitative and dynamic analysis of the formation of an immunological synapse using imaging flow cytometry. Journal of immunological methods 347, 79–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2009.05.014 (2009).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council (grant no 196386), the Norwegian Cancer Society (grant no 163359 and 163361), Legatet til Henrik Homans Minde, Anders Jahres fond til vitenskapens fremme, Novo Nordisk Fonden and University of Oslo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: G.A., V.S., B.B., A.S.; Experiments: G.A., M.H., V.S.; Data analysis: G.A., M.H. and A.S.; Writing: G.A., A.S. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Abrahamsen, G., Sundvold-Gjerstad, V., Habtamu, M. et al. Polarity of CD4+ T cells towards the antigen presenting cell is regulated by the Lck adapter TSAd. Sci Rep 8, 13319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31510-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31510-6
This article is cited by
-
A novel CD8+ T cell-related gene signature for predicting the prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in bladder cancer
Inflammation Research (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.